Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “replication fork stability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Slx1-Slx4 is a second structure-specific endonuclease functionally redundant with Sgs1-Top3.

The RecQ DNA helicases human BLM and yeast Sgs1 interact with DNA topoisomerase III and are thought to act on stalled replication forks to maintain genome stability. To gain insight into this mechanism, we previously identified SLX1 and SLX4 as genes that are required for viability and for completion of rDNA replication in the absence of SGS1-TOP3. Here we show that SLX1 and SLX4 encode a heteromeric structure-specific endonuclease. The Slx1-Slx4 nuclease is active on branched DNA substrates, particularly simple-Y, 5'-flap, or replication fork structures. It cleaves the strand bearing the 5' nonhomologous arm at the branch junction and generates ligatable nicked products from 5'-flap or replication fork substrates. Slx1 is the founding member of a family of proteins with a predicted URI nuclease domain and PHD-type zinc finger. This subunit displays weak structure-specific endonuclease activity on its own, is stimulated 500-fold by Slx4, and requires the PHD finger for activity in vitro and in vivo. Both subunits are required in vivo for resistance to DNA damage by methylmethane sulfonate (MMS). We propose that Sgs1-Top3 acts at the termination of rDNA replication to decatenate stalled forks, and, in its absence, Slx1-Slx4 cleaves these stalled forks.

DNA Helicases↗
PubMed2004

Diminished S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase function elicits vital Rad53-dependent checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) is required for the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Clb5 and Clb6 cyclins activate Cdk1 and drive replication origin firing. Deletion of CLB5 reduces initiation of DNA synthesis from late-firing origins. We have examined whether checkpoints are activated by loss of Clb5 function and whether checkpoints are responsible for the DNA replication defects associated with loss of Clb5 function. We present evidence for activation of Rad53 and Ddc2 functions with characteristics suggesting the presence of DNA damage. Deficient late origin firing in clb5Delta cells is not due to checkpoint regulation, but instead, directly reflects the decreased abundance of S-phase CDK, as Clb6 activates late origins when its dosage is increased. Moreover, the viability of clb5Delta cells depends on Rad53. Activation of Rad53 by either Mrc1 or Rad9 contributes to the survival of clb5Delta cells, suggesting that both DNA replication and damage pathways are responsive to the decreased origin usage. These results suggest that reduced origin usage leads to stress or DNA damage at replication forks, necessitating the function of Rad53 in fork stabilization. Consistent with the notion that decreased S-CDK function creates stress at replication forks, deletion of RRM3 helicase, which facilitates replisome progression, greatly diminished the growth of clb5Delta cells. Together, our findings indicate that deregulation of S-CDK function has the potential to exacerbate genomic instability by reducing replication origin usage.

CDC2 Protein Kinase↗
PubMed2005

BRCA2 suppresses cell proliferation via stabilizing MAGE-D1.

Germ line mutations in BRCA2 gene predispose women to early-onset familial breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA2 is a protein of multiple functions. In addition to its role in DNA double-strand break repair, BRCA2 also plays a role in stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks, cytokinesis, transcription regulation, mammalian gametogenesis, centrosome duplication, and suppression of cell proliferation. However, how BRCA2 mutations predispose women specifically to breast and ovarian cancer remains undefined. Here we found that BRCA2 binds and stabilizes MAGE-D1, a member of the MAGE gene family of proteins. Expression of BRCA2 and MAGE-D1 synergistically suppresses cell proliferation independently of the p53 pathway. Using two MAGE-D1 RNA interferences and two cell lines expressing low or undetectable levels of MAGE-D1, we further showed that the expression of MAGE-D1 is required for BRCA2-mediated suppression of cell proliferation, indicating that MAGE-D1 is a downstream target of BRCA2 and that BRCA2 suppresses cell proliferation via stabilizing MAGE-D1. Importantly, MAGE-D1 protein expression was reduced in 6 of 16 breast carcinoma cell lines tested as compared with untransformed immortal mammary epithelial cell lines, suggesting that suppression of MAGE-D1 expression may be involved in the tumorigenesis of a subset of sporadic breast cancers.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Multiple roles of replication forks in S phase checkpoints: sensors, effectors and targets.

There is mounting evidence that replication defects are the major source of spontaneous genomic instability in the cell and that S phase checkpoints are the principle defense against such instability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S phase checkpoints can be provoked by either depletion of dNTPs or DNA damage. In both cases the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 act to suppress late origin firing, stabilize slowed or stalled replication forks and prevent S phase progression until conditions are appropriate for the resumption of DNA replication. The present review highlights recent work emphasizing the central importance of replication forks, not just as targets, but also as sensors and primary effectors of checkpoint responses, and identifies the roles played by specific fork-associated factors in these processes.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks.

Homologous recombination is vital to repair fatal DNA damage during DNA replication. However, very little is known about the substrates or repair pathways for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Here, we have compared the recombination products produced spontaneously with those produced following induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) with the I-SceI restriction endonuclease or after stalling or collapsing replication forks following treatment with thymidine or camptothecin, respectively. We show that each lesion produces different spectra of recombinants, suggesting differential use of homologous recombination pathways in repair of these lesions. The spontaneous spectrum most resembled the spectra produced at collapsed replication forks formed when a replication fork runs into camptothecin-stabilized DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) within the topoisomerase I cleavage complex. We found that camptothecin-induced DSBs and the resulting recombination repair require replication, showing that a collapsed fork is the substrate for camptothecin-induced recombination. An SSB repair-defective cell line, EM9 with an XRCC1 mutation, has an increased number of spontaneous gammaH2Ax and RAD51 foci, suggesting that endogenous SSBs collapse replication forks, triggering recombination repair. Furthermore, we show that gammaH2Ax, DSBs, and RAD51 foci are synergistically induced in EM9 cells with camptothecin, suggesting that lack of SSB repair in EM9 causes more collapsed forks and more recombination repair. Furthermore, our results suggest that two-ended DSBs are rare substrates for spontaneous homologous recombination in a mammalian fibroblast cell line. Interestingly, all spectra showed evidence of multiple homologous recombination events in 8 to 16% of clones. However, there was no increase in homologous recombination genomewide in these clones nor were the events dependent on each other; rather, we suggest that a first homologous recombination event frequently triggers a second event at the same locus in mammalian cells.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Differential requirement of DNA replication for the cytotoxicity of DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in Chinese hamster DC3F cells.

The cytotoxicity of topoisomerase inhibitors is thought to result from the induction of enzyme-mediated DNA breaks. The fact that these breaks reverse rapidly in cells programmed to die, led us to investigate further the cytotoxic mechanisms of topoisomerase I (camptothecin) and topoisomerase II inhibitors (VP-16 and amsacrine) in Chinese Hamster lung fibroblasts (DC3F). Exposures (30 min) to camptothecin produced limited cell killing with approximately 20% of the cells naturally resistant. This resistance was overcome by increasing the drug exposure time. Inhibition of DNA synthesis by 5-min pretreatments with aphidicolin or hydroxyurea abolished the cytotoxicity of camptothecin without changing the level of camptothecin-induced DNA breaks. A good correlation was found between the degree of DNA synthesis inhibition by aphidicolin and the reduction of camptothecin cytotoxicity. In similar experiments performed with topoisomerase II inhibitors, aphidicolin prevented only partially against VP-16- and amsacrine-induced cytotoxicities, yet had no effect upon drug-induced DNA breaks. These results indicate that the production of topoisomerase-mediated DNA breaks by antitumor drugs is not sufficient for cell killing. Instead, an interference of moving DNA replication forks with drug-stabilized topoisomerase-DNA complexes is critical for cell death. The cytotoxicity of camptothecin seemed to be completely related to this process, while that of topoisomerase II inhibitors seemed to involve additional mechanisms in DC3F cells.

Amsacrine↗
PubMed2004

Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.

The fidelity of DNA replication is of paramount importance to the maintenance of genome integrity. When an active replication fork is perturbed, multiple cellular pathways are recruited to stabilize the replication apparatus and to help to bypass or correct the causative problem. However, if the problem is not corrected, the fork may collapse, exposing free DNA ends to potentially inappropriate processing. In prokaryotes, replication fork collapse promotes the activity of recombination proteins to restore a replication fork. Recent work has demonstrated that recombination is also intimately linked to replication in eukaryotic cells, and that recombination proteins are recruited to collapsed, but not stalled, replication forks. In this review we discuss the different types of potential replication fork barriers (RFB) and how these distinct RFBs can result in different DNA structures at the stalled replication fork. The DNA structure checkpoints which act within S phase respond to different RFBs in different ways and we thus discuss the processes that are controlled by the DNA replication checkpoints, paying particular attention to the function of the intra-S phase checkpoint that stabilises the stalled fork.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2006

Ccr4 contributes to tolerance of replication stress through control of CRT1 mRNA poly(A) tail length.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication stress activates the replication checkpoint, which slows S-phase progression, stabilizes slowed or stalled replication forks, and relieves inhibition of the ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) complex. To identify novel genes that promote cellular viability after replication stress, the S. cerevisiae non-essential haploid gene deletion set (4812 strains) was screened for sensitivity to the RNR inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU). Strains bearing deletions in either CCR4 or CAF1/POP2, which encode components of the cytoplasmic mRNA deadenylase complex, were particularly sensitive to HU. We found that Ccr4 cooperated with the Dun1 branch of the replication checkpoint, such that ccr4Delta dun1Delta strains exhibited irreversible hypersensitivity to HU and persistent activation of Rad53. Moreover, because ccr4Delta and chk1Delta exhibited epistasis in several genetic contexts, we infer that Ccr4 and Chk1 act in the same pathway to overcome replication stress. A counterscreen for suppressors of ccr4Delta HU sensitivity uncovered mutations in CRT1, which encodes the transcriptional repressor of the DNA-damage-induced gene regulon. Whereas Dun1 is known to inhibit Crt1 repressor activity, we found that Ccr4 regulates CRT1 mRNA poly(A) tail length and may subtly influence Crt1 protein abundance. Simultaneous overexpression of RNR2, RNR3 and RNR4 partially rescued the HU hypersensitivity of a ccr4Delta dun1Delta strain, consistent with the notion that the RNR genes are key targets of Crt1. These results implicate the coordinated regulation of Crt1 via Ccr4 and Dun1 as a crucial nodal point in the response to DNA replication stress.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed1997

Arrest of replication fork progression at sites of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage in human leukemia CEM cells incubated with VM-26.

Recent studies have shown that the anticancer drugs VM-26 and mitoxantrone stabilize preferentially the binding of topoisomerase IIalpha to replicating compared to nonreplicating DNA. To further understand the mechanisms by which cleavable complex-forming topoisomerase II inhibitors interfere with DNA replication, we examined the effects of VM-26 on this process in human leukemia CEM cells. Both the inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell survival were directly related to the total amount of drug-stabilized cleavable complexes formed in VM-26-treated cells. DNA chain elongation was also inhibited in a concentration-dependent fashion in these cells, which suggested that VM-26-stabilized cleavable complexes interfered with the movement of DNA replication forks. To test this hypothesis directly, we monitored replication fork progression at a specific site of VM-26-induced DNA cleavage. A topoisomerase II-mediated cleavage site was detected in the first exon of the c-myc gene in VM-26-treated cells. This cleavage site was downstream of a putative replication origin located in the 5' flanking region of the gene. Replication forks, which moved through this region of the c-myc gene in the 5' to 3' direction, were specifically arrested at this site in VM-26-treated cells, but not in untreated or aphidicolin-treated cells. These studies provide the first direct evidence that a VM-26-stabilized topoisomerase II-DNA cleavable complex acts as a replication fork barrier at a specific genomic site in mammalian cells. Furthermore, the data support the hypothesis that the replication fork arrest induced by cleavable complex-forming topoisomerase II inhibitors leads to the generation of irreversible DNA damage and cytotoxicity in proliferating cells.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed1993

Effect of site-specifically located mitomycin C-DNA monoadducts on in vitro DNA synthesis by DNA polymerases.

A series of site-specifically modified oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized that contained either of the two known mitomycin C-DNA monoadducts. In vitro DNA synthesis was carried out on some of these templates using a modified bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase), AMV reverse transcriptase, and two different varieties of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment)--one that carries the normal 3'-->5' exonuclease activity and a mutant protein that lacks this enzymatic function. Regardless of the type of DNA polymerase being used, DNA synthesis was terminated nearly quantitatively at the nucleotide 3' to each of these two monoadduct sites, although primer extension to full length of the template was noted with the unmodified control template. Substitution of Mn2+ for Mg2+ at a high concentration of the deoxynucleotide triphosphates resulted in incorporation of nucleotides opposite the adduct in the incubations with Sequenase or the 3'-->5' exonuclease-free Klenow fragment; however, primer extension beyond the adduct site did not take place. These studies demonstrated that the mitomycin monoadducts are strong blocks of replication and are likely to be toxic lesions in vivo. Since previous molecular modeling studies and molecular mechanical calculations indicated that the mitomycin adduction does not induce severe distortions at the site of adduction, a lack of base-pairing ability of the modified base in the extended product is unlikely to be the reason for the inhibitory effect. Instead, energy-minimized structural models indicated that additional hydrogen-bonding interactions have been introduced by the mitomycin moiety, and perhaps this increased thermodynamic stabilization of a distorted structure of the replication fork, in turn, may block the replication bypass. Experimental evidence of increased thermodynamic stability was provided by thermal melting of a template/primer complex that presumably a polymerase encounters in a typical replication fork. Consistently higher Tm of the adducted "replication fork" was noted when compared to its unmodified counterpart.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance.

The RecQ helicase Sgs1p forms a complex with the type 1 DNA topoisomerase Top3p that resolves double Holliday junctions resulting from Rad51-mediated exchange. We find, however, that Sgs1p functions independently of both Top3p and Rad51p to stimulate the checkpoint kinase Rad53p when replication forks stall due to dNTP depletion on hydroxyurea. Checkpoint activation does not require Sgs1p function as a helicase, and correlates with its ability to bind the Rad53p kinase FHA1 motif directly. On the other hand, Sgs1p's helicase activity is required together with Top3p and the strand-exchange factor Rad51p, to help stabilise DNA polymerase epsilon at stalled replication forks. In this function, the Sgs1p/Top3p complex acts in parallel to the Claspin-related adaptor, Mrc1p, although the sgs1 and mrc1 mutations are epistatic for Rad53p activation. We thus identify two distinct pathways through which Sgs1p contributes to genomic integrity: checkpoint kinase activation requires Sgs1p as a noncatalytic Rad53p-binding site, while the combined Top3p/Sgs1p resolvase activity contributes to replisome stability and recovery from arrested replication forks.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2004

UV-induced ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) activation requires replication stress.

Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) plays an essential role in the maintenance of genome integrity and cell viability. The kinase is activated in response to DNA damage and initiates a checkpoint signaling cascade by phosphorylating a number of downstream substrates including Chk1. Unlike ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), which appears to be mainly activated by DNA double-strand breaks, ATR can be activated by a variety of DNA damaging agents. However, it is still unclear what triggers ATR activation in response to such diverse DNA lesions. One model proposes that ATR can directly recognize DNA lesions, while other recent data suggest that ATR is activated by a common single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediate generated during DNA repair. In this study, we show that UV lesions do not directly activate ATR in vivo. In addition, ssDNA lesions created during the repair of UV damage are also not sufficient to activate the ATR-dependent pathway. ATR activation is only observed in replicating cells indicating that replication stress is required to trigger the ATR-mediated checkpoint cascade in response to UV irradiation. Interestingly, H2AX appears to be required for the accumulation of ATR at stalled replication forks. Together our data suggest that ssDNA at arrested replication forks recruits ATR and initiates ATR-mediated phosphorylation of H2AX and Chk1. Phosphorylated H2AX might further facilitate ATR activation by stabilizing ATR at the sites of arrested replication forks.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2001

p53 accumulates but is functionally impaired when DNA synthesis is blocked.

p53 is required for the induction of a G(1) and/or G(2) irreversible arrest after gamma irradiation (IR), whereas blocked DNA replication causes a p53-independent S-phase arrest. We have examined the response to p53 when DNA synthesis is blocked by hydroxyurea (HU) or aphidicolin or when DNA is damaged by gamma IR. Similarly to gamma IR, blocked DNA synthesis induces high levels of phosphorylated nuclear p53. Surprisingly, several (but not all) p53 transcriptional targets that are rapidly induced by gamma IR are weakly or not induced when DNA replication is blocked. Moreover, the p53 response to gamma IR is inhibited by pretreatment of cells with HU or aphidicolin, suggesting that blocked DNA replication prevents p53 from being fully active as a transcription factor. HU-induced stabilization of p53 neither requires functional ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated), nor interferes with the gamma IR-dependent activation of the ATM kinase. Thus, stalled replication forks activate kinases that modify and stabilize p53, yet act downstream of ATM to impair p53 transcriptional activity. The ramifications of this novel regulation of p53 are discussed.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks.

The Ubc9 SUMO-conjugating enzyme and the Siz1 SUMO ligase sumoylate several repair and recombination proteins, including PCNA. Sumoylated PCNA binds Srs2, a helicase counteracting certain recombination events. Here we show that ubc9 mutants depend on checkpoint, recombination, and replication genes for growth. ubc9 cells maintain stalled-fork stability but exhibit a Rad51-dependent accumulation of cruciform structures during replication of damaged templates. Mutations in the Mms21 SUMO ligase resemble the ubc9 mutations. However, siz1, srs2, or pcna mutants altered in sumoylation do not exhibit the ubc9/mms21 phenotype. Like ubc9/mms21 mutants, sgs1 and top3 mutants also accumulate X molecules at damaged forks, and Sgs1/BLM is sumoylated. We propose that Ubc9 and Mms21 act in concert with Sgs1 to resolve the X structures formed during replication. Our results indicate that Ubc9- and Mms21-mediated sumoylation functions as a regulatory mechanism, different from that of replication checkpoints, to prevent pathological accumulation of cruciform structures at damaged forks.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2003

Identification and characterization of human MUS81-MMS4 structure-specific endonuclease.

Replication forks may stall when they reach a block on the DNA template such as DNA damage, and the recovery of such stalled replication forks plays a crucial role in the maintenance of genomic stability. Holliday junctions, which are X-shaped DNA structures, are formed at the stalled replication forks and can accumulate if they are not cleaved by structure-specific endonucleases. Recently, a novel nuclease involved in resolving Holliday junction-like structures, Mus81, has been reported in yeast and humans. MUS81 has sequence homology to another DNA nuclease, XPF, which, with its partner ERCC1, makes the 5' incision during nucleotide excision repair. MUS81 also has a binding partner named Mms4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Eme1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, but no such partner was identified in human cells. Here, we report identification of the binding partner of human MUS81, which we designate hMMS4. Using immunoaffinity purification we show that hMUS81 or hMMS4 alone have no detectable nuclease activity, but that the hMUS81.hMMS4 complex is a structure-specific nuclease that is capable of resolving fork structures.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2026

Linker Histone H1 Phosphorylation Promotes DNA Damage Repair during Replication Stress.

DNA replication fidelity depends on the integrity of the replication fork to prevent DNA damage and preserve genome stability. Disruptions to this process can trigger replication stress, leading to the accumulation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) and double-strand breaks (DSBs), which drive mutagenesis and ultimately contribute to disease. While the roles of core histones and their post-translational modifications in this context have been more well-studied, far less is known about how linker histones regulate the replication stress response. Here, we demonstrate that the S-phase-phosphorylated form of the linker histone H1 (pH1) plays a key role in DNA damage repair at collapsed replication forks, both in vitro and in cells. Using phosphomimic and phosphonull H1 mutants, we show that phosphorylation enhances H1 assembly with ssDNA. Utilizing intein chemistry for the site-specific incorporation of a photocrosslinker to the C-terminus of H1, we map the direct interactors of H1. We identify phosphorylated H1 at replication forks, where it engages replication machinery and DNA damage response factors, including Histone PARylation Factor 1 (HPF1). We further demonstrate that ssDNA induces pH1-HPF1 interactions that promote liquid-like assemblies, correlating with reduced DNA damage and histone PARylation. Consistent with this role, reduction of total H1 increases cellular sensitivity to DNA damage, a phenotype that is partially rescued by reintroduction of H1.4. Together, these findings establish pH1 as a new regulator of DNA damage repair at collapsed replication forks through the controlled sequestration of repair factors.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Replication forks can stall spontaneously at specific sites in the genome, and upon encountering DNA lesions resulting from chemical or radiation damage. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins implicated in processing of stalled replication forks include those encoded by the SGS1, TOP3, MUS81, MMS4, SLX1, SLX4, SLX5/HEX3, and SLX8 genes. We tested the roles of these genes in suppressing gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs), which include translocations, large interstitial deletions, and loss of a chromosome arm with de novo telomere addition. We found that mus81, mms4, slx1, slx4, slx5, and slx8 mutants all have elevated levels of spontaneous GCRs, and that SLX5 and SLX8 are particularly critical suppressors of GCRs during normal cell cycle progression. In addition to increased GCRs, deletion of SLX5 or SLX8 resulted in increased relocalization of the DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc2 and activation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53, indicating the accumulation of spontaneous DNA damage. Surprisingly, mutants in slx5 or slx8 were not sensitive to transient replication fork stalling induced by hydroxyurea, nor were they sensitive to replication dependent double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin. This suggested that Slx8 and Slx8 played limited roles in stabilizing, restarting, or resolving transiently stalled replication forks, but were critical for preventing the accumulation of DNA damage during normal cell cycle progression.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Assessment of ATM phosphorylation on Ser-1981 induced by DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in relation to Ser-139-histone H2AX phosphorylation, cell cycle phase, and apoptosis.

BACKGROUND: The ATM kinase regulates cell-cycle checkpoints by phosphorylating multiple proteins, including histone H2AX, CHK1, and CHK2 kinases and p53. ATM is activated through auto- or trans- phosphorylation of Ser-1981 in response to DNA damage, particularly induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The aim of the present study was to reveal a possible correlation between activation of ATM vis-à-vis H2AX phosphorylation, cell cycle phase, and apoptosis in cells treated with DNA topoisomerase (topo) I (topotecan; Tpt) or topo2 (mitoxantrone; Mtx) inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cultures of HL-60 cells were treated with Tpt or Mtx for various time intervals. ATM or H2AX phosphorylation was detected immunocytochemically, using Ab specific for ATM phosphorylated on Ser-1981 (ATM-S1981(P)) or for H2AX (gammaH2AX) phosphorylated on Ser-139, respectively, concurrent with the analysis of cellular DNA content. Cellular fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Untreated cells showed a modest but variable level of labeling with ATM-S1981(P) Ab across the cell cycle, with exception of mitotic cells that were strongly labeled. Exposure of cells to 150 nM Tpt induced ATM phosphorylation concurrent with phosphorylation of H2AX within 10 min; phosphorylation of both proteins was essentially limited to S-phase and was suppressed by caffeine and wortmannin, inhibitors of PI-3-like kinases. Exposure of cells to Mtx also led to ATM and H2AX phosphorylation, which, compared to Tpt, occurred later and was not cell-cycle-phase specific. Apoptosis of HL-60 cells in Tpt or Mtx treated cultures was detected after 2 or 4 h, respectively, and was limited to S-phase cells. CONCLUSIONS: The data are consistent with the role of ATM as a mediator of H2AX phosphorylation in response to DNA damage by topo1 (Tpt) or topo 2 (Mtx) inhibitor. The observed cell-cycle-phase related differences in response to Tpt vs Mtx suggest that while the collisions of DNA replication forks with the "cleavable complexes" stabilized by topo1 inhibitor are the primary cause of DSBs induced by Tpt, the collisions of RNA polymerase molecules with the complexes stabilized by the topo2 inhibitor play a major role for induction of DSBs by Mtx. The present report is the first that (i) describes cytometric analysis of ATM activation and (ii) demonstrates activation of the enzyme (kinase) and its consequence (substrate phoshorylation), both in relation to cell-cycle phase and onset of apoptosis within the same cells.

Apoptosis↗