Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “diagnostic accuracy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

CT-guided percutaneous core biopsies of pulmonary lesions. Diagnostic accuracy, complications and therapeutic impact.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, complications, and therapeutic impact of CT-guided percutaneous core biopsies of pulmonary lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients underwent diagnostic CT-guided percutaneous core biopsies of pulmonary lesions between July 1995 and March 1999. Evaluation included corresponding clinical data, pathologic results, and therapeutic consequences. RESULTS: There were 29 benign and 50 malignant lesions. Percutaneous core biopsy had an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95%. For malignant lesions, core biopsy was positive in 48 patients (sensitivity 96%), and for benign lesions, in 27 (sensitivity 93%). There were no false-positive findings. Pneumothoraces were observed in 19 patients (24%) and 4 of them required a chest drain (5%). There were no hematothoraces or major bleeding complications; however, postinterventional local hemorrhages were observed in 23 patients (29%). No hemoptysis was noted. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous core biopsies of pulmonary lesions offer excellent diagnostic accuracy for both benign and malignant pulmonary lesions at a low complication rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.

BACKGROUND: Studies with methodologic shortcomings can overestimate the accuracy of a medical test. We sought to determine and compare the direction and magnitude of the effects of a number of potential sources of bias and variation in studies on estimates of diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We identified meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of tests through an electronic search of the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE and MEDION (1999-2002). We included meta-analyses with at least 10 primary studies without preselection based on design features. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and original data from the primary studies. We used a multivariable meta-epidemiologic regression model to investigate the direction and strength of the association between 15 study features on estimates of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: We selected 31 meta-analyses with 487 primary studies of test evaluations. Only 1 study had no design deficiencies. The quality of reporting was poor in most of the studies. We found significantly higher estimates of diagnostic accuracy in studies with nonconsecutive inclusion of patients (relative diagnostic odds ratio [RDOR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.1) and retrospective data collection (RDOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). The estimates were highest in studies that had severe cases and healthy controls (RDOR 4.9, 95% CI 0.6-37.3). Studies that selected patients based on whether they had been referred for the index test, rather than on clinical symptoms, produced significantly lower estimates of diagnostic accuracy (RDOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9). The variance between meta-analyses of the effect of design features was large to moderate for type of design (cohort v. case-control), the use of composite reference standards and the use of differential verification; the variance was close to zero for the other design features. INTERPRETATION: Shortcomings in study design can affect estimates of diagnostic accuracy, but the magnitude of the effect may vary from one situation to another. Design features and clinical characteristics of patient groups should be carefully considered by researchers when designing new studies and by readers when appraising the results of such studies. Unfortunately, incomplete reporting hampers the evaluation of potential sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

[Diagnostic accuracy].

Clinical decision making while making a diagnosis is based on pre-test probability evaluation, a decision whether further tests are needed, and post-test probability evaluation based on test results. The add value of the test is the increase in probability, which depends on its diagnostic accuracy. Some measures of diagnostic accuracy are sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio, area under the curve, Youden index, and diagnostic odds ratio. ROC curve is the most efficient way of graphic description of the relationship between sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic accuracy of a test is evaluated in a cross-sectional study on a group of individuals subjected simultaneously to the index test and the gold standard. All parameters of diagnostic accuracy are very sensitive to the study design, therefore it is of utmost importance to perform and write a study to adhere to the proposed STARD standards. This lecture gives an insight into the basics of biostatistical terminology from the field of diagnostic accuracy.

Biometry↗
PubMed2005

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals.

AIM: To evaluate the quality of reporting of all diagnostic studies published in five major ophthalmic journals in the year 2002 using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative parameters. METHODS: Manual searching was used to identify diagnostic studies published in 2002 in five leading ophthalmic journals, the American Journal of Ophthalmology (AJO), Archives of Ophthalmology (Archives), British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO), Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS), and Ophthalmology. The STARD checklist of 25 items and flow chart was used to evaluate the quality of each publication. RESULTS: A total of 16 publications were included (AJO = 5, Archives = 1, BJO = 2, IOVS = 2, and Ophthalmology = 6). More than half of the studies (n = 9) were related to glaucoma diagnosis. Other specialties included retina (n = 4) cornea (n = 2), and neuro-ophthalmology (n = 1). The most common description of diagnostic accuracy was sensitivity and specificity values, published in 13 articles. The number of fully reported items in evaluated studies ranged from eight to 19. Seven studies reported more than 50% of the STARD items. CONCLUSIONS: The current standards of reporting of diagnostic accuracy tests are highly variable. The STARD initiative may be a useful tool for appraising the strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological↗
PubMed2004

Transthoracic CT-guided biopsy with multiplanar reconstruction image improves diagnostic accuracy of solitary pulmonary nodules.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) image for CT-guided biopsy and determine factors of influencing diagnostic accuracy and the pneumothorax rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 390 patients with 396 pulmonary nodules underwent transthoracic CT-guided aspiration biopsy (TNAB) and transthoracic CT-guided cutting needle core biopsy (TCNB) as follows: 250 solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) underwent conventional CT-guided biopsy (conventional method), 81 underwent CT-fluoroscopic biopsy (CT-fluoroscopic method) and 65 underwent conventional CT-guided biopsy in combination with MPR image (MPR method). Success rate, overall diagnostic accuracy, pneumothorax rate and total procedure time were compared in each method. Factors affecting diagnostic accuracy and pneumothorax rate of CT-guided biopsy were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Success rates (TNAB: 100.0%, TCNB: 100.0%) and overall diagnostic accuracies (TNAB: 96.9%, TCNB: 97.0%) of MPR were significantly higher than those using the conventional method (TNAB: 87.6 and 82.4%, TCNB: 86.3 and 81.3%) (P < 0.05). Diagnostic accuracy were influenced by biopsy method, lesion size, and needle path length (P < 0.05). Pneumothorax rate was influenced by pathological diagnostic method, lesion size, number of punctures and FEV1.0% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of MPR for CT-guided lung biopsy is useful for improving diagnostic accuracy with no significant increase in pneumothorax rate or total procedure time.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Diagnostic accuracy of the care dependency scale.

AIM: This paper reports an investigation of the diagnostic accuracy of the Care Dependency Scale (CDS). BACKGROUND: Assessment tools can be described in terms of diagnostic accuracy, or the ability to correctly classify subjects into clinically relevant subgroups. Diagnostic accuracy can be determined by several techniques as sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating curve analysis and likelihood ratios. METHOD: A cross-sectional design was used with data from 237 patients from two studies. Data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of the CDS and the Barthel Index (BI). The CDS is a relatively new instrument and should be validated by comparison against an established gold standard, in this case the BI. Measures to quantify the validity of diagnostic tests, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, prevalence and likelihood ratios were calculated. In addition, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to report the test accuracy of the CDS and to determine an appropriate cut-off point for care dependency detection. FINDINGS: The prevalence in the sample study was very high (84%). The area under the ROC curve for the CDS was 0.81, which indicates moderate diagnostic accuracy. Patients with a CDS sumscore </=68 (rule-out cut-off point) were classified as care dependent, all others as independent. The determination of the appropriate cut-off point was based on sensitivity (0.85) and positive predictive valued (0.90). CONCLUSION: The CDS may be used for to estimate care dependency among hospital patients with various conditions.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2006

Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) is a new tool to measure the methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies in systematic reviews. We used data from a systematic review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in the characterization of suspected brain tumors to provide a preliminary evaluation of the inter-rater reliability of QUADAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured literature search identified 19 diagnostic accuracy studies. These publications were distributed randomly to primary and secondary reviewers for dual independent assessment. Reviewers recorded methodological quality by using QUADAS on a custom-designed spreadsheet. We calculated correlation, percentage of agreement, and kappa statistic to assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Most studies in our review were judged to have used an accurate reference standard. Conversely, the MRS literature frequently failed to specify the length of time between index and reference tests or that the clinicians were unaware of the index test findings when reporting the reference standard. There was good correlation (rho = 0.78) between reviewers in assessment of the overall number of quality criteria met. However, mean agreement for individual QUADAS questions was only fair (kappa = 0.22) and ranged from no agreement beyond chance (kappa < 0) to moderate agreement (kappa = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Inter-rater reliability in our study was relatively low. Nevertheless, we believe that QUADAS potentially is a useful tool for highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of existing diagnostic accuracy studies. Low reliability suggests that different reviewers will reach different conclusions if QUADAS is used to exclude "low-quality" articles from meta-analyses. We discuss methods for improving the validity and reliability of QUADAS.

Brain Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

Effect of one or more co-morbid conditions on diagnostic accuracy of coronary flow velocity reserve for detecting significant left anterior descending coronary stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of one or multiple co-morbid conditions on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in a heterogeneous patient population. METHODS: CFVR was measured in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) in 318 consecutive patients before elective coronary angiography. CFVR was calculated as the average peak diastolic velocity during intravenous ATP infusion divided by baseline flow velocity. All patients underwent coronary angiography within 48 hours. Significant LAD stenosis was defined as > 50% luminal narrowing. Diagnostic accuracy of CFVR was analysed according to the type and number of risk factors that may adversely affect microvascular function. RESULTS: CFVR was measured in 309 patients, of whom 105 were found to have significant LAD stenosis based on coronary angiography. CFVR < 2.0 had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 77% for predicting significant LAD stenosis. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was the only factor that significantly lowered diagnostic accuracy (61% with LVH v 84% without LVH, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy was not affected by increasing number of risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of CFVR by TTDE for detecting significant LAD stenosis remains high in a more clinically relevant population with multiple cardiovascular co-morbidities. Only the presence of LVH adversely affected diagnostic accuracy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions.

CONTEXT: Needle core biopsy has been reported to be the choice of biopsy for musculoskeletal tumors. Fine-needle aspiration, on the other hand, has been widely accepted for nonmusculoskeletal tumors, but is only used in selected medical centers for musculoskeletal tumors. While fine-needle aspiration appears to have advantages to needle core biopsy in the aspects of simplicity and cost, the diagnostic accuracy should be the most critical parameter in determining the choice of biopsy. However, few studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of these 2 biopsy methods have been performed. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration and needle core biopsy in musculoskeletal tumors. DESIGN: Prospective study was performed in patients aged 10 years or older. Diagnostic accuracy was compared in 50 consecutive concurrent needle core biopsies and fine-needle aspirations of musculoskeletal lesions. RESULTS: For primary musculoskeletal lesions, fine-needle aspiration achieved a diagnostic accuracy rate of 88% for nature of lesion, 64% for specific diagnosis, 78% for histologic grading, and 74% for histologic typing. Needle core biopsy achieved an accuracy rate of 93% for nature of lesions, 83% for specific diagnosis, 83% for histologic grading, and 90% for histologic typing. Both biopsy methods have a higher diagnostic accuracy rate for high-grade tumors than for low-grade or benign lesions in determining the nature, specific diagnosis, and histologic grading. CONCLUSIONS: The needle core biopsy has a higher diagnostic accuracy than fine-needle aspiration in all aspects, including determining the nature of the tumor, establishing the histologic type and grade, and achieving a specific diagnosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) in glaucoma. METHODS: Analysis 1 included 67 eyes with glaucomatous visual field loss and 56 eyes of normal volunteers. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy in this analysis were compared to those obtained from analysis 2, which included a cohort of patients with suspected glaucoma, but without visual field loss at the time of CSLO imaging. For analysis 2, 40 eyes with progressive glaucomatous optic disc change were included in the glaucoma group and 43 eyes without any evidence of progressive damage to the optic nerve that were observed untreated for an average time of 9.01 +/- 3.09 years were included in the normal group. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of CSLO parameters. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the performance of the parameter with largest AUC, discriminant function Bathija, in analysis 1 (AUC = 0.91) compared with its performance in analysis 2 (AUC = 0.71; P = 0.002). For the contour-line-independent parameter glaucoma probability score, a statistically significant difference was also observed in the performance obtained in analysis 1 (AUC = 0.89) compared with analysis 2 (AUC = 0.65; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of diagnostic accuracy of CSLO in glaucoma can be largely different depending on the population studied and the reference standard used to define disease. Diagnostic accuracy estimates obtained from case-control studies including well-defined groups of subjects with or without disease may not be applicable to the clinically relevant population.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Attenuation correction by simultaneous emission-transmission myocardial single-photon emission tomography using a technetium-99m-labelled radiotracer: impact on diagnostic accuracy.

Irregular photon attenuation may limit the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial single-photon emission tomography (SPET). The aim of this study was to quantify the potential benefit of attenuation correction by simultaneous emission and transmission imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) of vessels supplying the inferoposterior wall segments. In 25 male patients with >/=50% stenoses of the right coronary artery and/or circumflex artery but without significant narrowing of the left anterior descending artery, stress studies using technetium-99m tetrofosmin (400 MBq) were carried out with and without attenuation correction. A dual-head camera with L-shaped detector positioning was equipped with two scanning gadolinium-153 line sources. Tomograms were reconstructed and quantified using circumferential count rate profiles of myocardial activity (two in each patient). The profiles were compared with the respective normal ranges obtained from a database of 25 male patients with a <10% likelihood of CAD. In patients without CAD, the maximal differences in count density of different wall segments were reduced from 29.0% in non-corrected (NC) studies to 9.5% in attenuation-corrected (AC) studies. In particular, the inferoposterior and septal wall segments were represented by significantly increased relative count densities after attenuation correction. The effects of attenuation correction proved independent of body mass. In patients with CAD, segmental count densities were abnormal in 84% of the NC studies and 100% of the AC studies. In single-vessel disease the stenotic vessel was identified in 66% of cases by NC studies and in 100% by AC studies. In AC studies, the extent and depth of defects exceeded those in NC studies. For the detection of CAD of the right coronary artery, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves relating to the AC studies demonstrated improved discrimination capacity (P<0.05). ROC analysis of CAD detection yielded normalcy rates of 82% (NC) and 94% (AC) for the circumflex artery and 65% (NC) and 97% (AC) for the right coronary artery area at a sensitivity level of 95%. It is concluded that attenuation correction using the above system may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial SPET when inferoposterior wall segments are to be evaluated.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Diagnostic accuracy of B type natriuretic peptide and amino terminal proBNP in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare head to head the diagnostic accuracy of B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the amino terminal fragment of its precursor hormone (NT-proBNP) for congestive heart failure (CHF) in an emergency setting. METHODS: 251 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnoea as a chief complaint were prospectively studied. Patients with acute coronary syndromes were excluded. The diagnosis of CHF was based on the Framingham score for CHF plus echocardiographic evidence of systolic or diastolic dysfunction. Blood concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP were measured by two commercially available assays (Abbott and Roche methods). The diagnostic accuracies of BNP and NT-proBNP were assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Areas under the curve for BNP and NT-proBNP in patients with dyspnoea caused by CHF (n = 137) and in patients with dyspnoea attributable to other reasons (n = 114) did not differ significantly (area under the curve 0.916 v 0.903, p = 0.277, statistical power 94%). Cut off concentrations with the highest diagnostic accuracy were 295 ng/l for BNP (sensitivity 80%, specificity 86%, diagnostic accuracy 83%) and 825 ng/l for NT-proBNP (sensitivity 87%, specificity 81%, diagnostic accuracy 84%). Evaluation of discordant false classifications at these cut off concentrations showed no advantage for either BNP nor NT-proBNP in the biochemical diagnosis of CHF (17 misclassifications by BNP and 14 by NT-proBNP, p = 0.720). In the population studied, age, sex, and renal function had no impact on the diagnostic utility of both tests when compared by logistic regression models. CONCLUSIONS: BNP and NT-proBNP may be equally useful as an aid in the diagnosis of CHF in short of breath patients presenting to the emergency department.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the caries diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities used in the assessment of digital radiographs obtained with four different dental systems, and to evaluate whether the software used for image assessment influenced the mutual comparison of those four dental systems relating to their caries diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Under in vitro and standardized conditions 122 teeth (with 228 unrestored approximal and 99 occlusal surfaces) were radiographed in blocks of 3 test teeth and 2 non-test teeth using two storage phosphor plate systems: Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) and DenOptix (Gendex, Dentsply, Milan, Italy) and two charge coupled device (CCD)-based sensor systems: Dixi (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and Sidexis (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). The images were displayed and examined in two software modalities: their own dedicated software and a general software. Three observers examined all images for the presence of approximal enamel and dentine and occlusal dentine caries lesions using a 5-point confidence scale. The true presence of caries was validated by ground section histology. The diagnostic accuracy of the software modalities was expressed as ROC curve areas (A(z)) and differences between modalities were tested by paired t-test. Comparison of systems was analysed by post hoc t-test. RESULTS: Results of approximal and occlusal surfaces assessed together revealed nearly identical mean A(z) with the two software modalities on images obtained with the Digora (A(z)=0.71) and DenOptix (A(z)=0.72) systems. On Dixi images the mean A(z) was 0.75 using the system's own software and 0.73 using the general software. On Sidexis images the corresponding mean A(z)s were 0.79 and 0.75. None of those differences were significant. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in caries diagnostic accuracy was found between two software modalities used for examination of digital radiographs obtained with four different digital systems, and the software modality did not influence the mutual rank of the four systems relating to their diagnostic accuracy.

Data Display↗
PubMed2006

Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random error, using the original data of a diagnostic accuracy study. External validation requires a new study in an independent but similar population. Here we describe whether diagnostic research is validated, which technique is used, and to what extent the validation study results differ from the original. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: All original diagnostic accuracy studies published in 1993 in a predefined set of journals were selected. Validation of these studies was assessed in the original article and in articles published within a period of 10 years, through a literature search and contacting the authors. RESULTS: None of the original studies reported any form of validation. Validation studies published later could be identified for 7 of the 11 original studies. Test characteristics were difficult to compare. Despite what was generally believed, not every validation study showed results inferior to the original. We found more studies that evaluated the test in a different population than in a similar one. CONCLUSION: Not every diagnostic accuracy study is validated. Diagnostic tests are more often repeated in different populations.

Databases, Bibliographic↗
PubMed2004

Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography System with that of standard screen-film mammography in a population of women presenting for screening or diagnostic mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enrollment of patients took place at six different breast-imaging centers between 1997 and 1999. A total of 247 cases were selected for inclusion in the final reader study. All known cancer cases were included (111) from all six participating sites representing 45% of the total cases. The remaining 136 cases (55%) were randomly selected from all available benign or negative cases from three of the six sites. A complete case consisted of both a (unilateral or bilateral) digital and screen-film mammogram of the same patient. Eight radiologists interpreted the cases in laser-printed digital and screen-film hardcopy formats. The study was designed to detect differences of 0.05 in the ROC area under the curve (AUC) between digital and screen-film radiologist interpretation performance. RESULTS: The average AUC for the Senoscan digital was 0.715 for the 8 readers. The average AUC for screen-film was 0.765. The difference AUC of -0.05 falls within the 95% confidence interval (-0.101, 0.002). The average sensitivity was 66% and specificity 67% for SenoScan full-field digital mammography. The average screen-film mammography sensitivity and specificity were 74% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the Fischer Senoscan and screen-film mammography was detected in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of Three Different Protocols for Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography: Does the Addition of Atropine Increase Complications, and Does It Improve Diagnostic Accuracy?

The addition of atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is increasingly used for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD), but its safety and whether it has added diagnostic accuracy have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the complication rate and diagnostic accuracy of three different protocols in the same laboratory. DSE was performed in 1090 patients over a 5-year period. The protocol had included (1) 5' stages up to 30 µg/kg/min of dobutamine in the first 184 patients, (2) 3' stages up to 40 µg/kg/min in the next 274 patients, and (3) 3' stages up to 40 µg/kg/min with atropine, when required in the last 632 patients. A large number of patients (n = 938) underwent coronary angiography within 2 weeks, and 524 patients had a significant coronary stenosis (> 50%). In the whole group of 1090 patients, serious complications developed in 5 patients (one acute myocardial infarction, one sustained ventricular tachycardia, and three prolonged ischemia). Although the incidence was low, there were no detectable differences between protocols. Hypotension, which was defined as a >/= 20 mmHg decrease in systolic blood pressure from the baseline, was observed in 68 patients. Premature ventricular contraction was the most common arrhythmia. The complication rate was similar among three protocols. The diagnostic accuracy for detecting CAD was nearly the same among three protocols (30 µg, 86%; 40 µg, 84%; and 40 µg with atropine, 84%), but the prevalence of CAD was higher with the 30-µg protocol (65%) than the 40-µg protocol (55%) or 40-µg-with-atropine protocol (53%, P < 0.01). In 469 patients without a previous myocardial infarction, the prevalence of CAD was the same (38-42%). Sensitivity increased with more aggressive protocols (71%, 76%, and 84%). However, it was associated with the loss of specificity (92%, 92%, and 85%). Thus, the diagnostic accuracy was similar among groups (84%, 85%, and 84%). In conclusion, the addition of atropine during DSE does not increase the rate of complication compared with previous conservative protocols and shows the same diagnostic accuracy with a small increase in sensitivity at the cost of a small and matched decrease in specificity.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1984

Comparison of exercise perfusion and ventricular function imaging: an analysis of factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of each technique.

Exercise thallium-201 perfusion scans and gated equilibrium blood pool scans were performed in 120 catheterized patients with a chest pain syndrome. Eighty-six patients had coronary artery disease and 34 patients did not. The effects of gender, propranolol, exercise level, exercise ischemia, history of typical angina, history of previous myocardial infarction, electrocardiographic Q waves, number of diseases vessels and extent of coronary artery obstruction on diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. The overall sensitivity and specificity of thallium scans were 76 and 68%, respectively, and those of gated blood pool scans 80 and 62% (p = not significant). Propranolol decreased the specificity of thallium scans (propranolol = 42%; no propranolol = 87%, p less than 0.05). Thallium scans and anginal history were less sensitive for detecting coronary disease in women (men: thallium = 79%; angina = 77%; women: 54 and 46%, respectively; p less than 0.05). Exercise level did not significantly affect the diagnostic accuracy of either scan. Thallium and gated scans were both highly sensitive (95%) in detecting disease in 20 patients with a prior myocardial infarction, angina and a positive electrocardiogram. The sensitivity of the thallium scan significantly decreased as the number of diseased vessels decreased. Both thallium and gated scans were less frequently positive in patients with atypical angina or no Q waves, but were not significantly influenced by electrocardiographic ischemia. The sensitivity and specificity of both scans were low in 57 patients with the combination of atypical angina, no history of infarction and equivocal stress electrocardiogram thallium = 61 and 63%, respectively; gated = 61 and 67%). When stress thallium scan evaluation included the electrocardiogram and thallium scan interpretation, the diagnostic accuracy was 81%. When all the information from gated scans (wall motion, ejection fraction, pulmonary blood volume) was combined for final gated scan evaluation, the diagnostic accuracy was 83%. When electrocardiographic data were added to all three gated scan variables, diagnostic accuracy was 77%. In conclusion, thallium perfusion and gated blood pool scans have reasonable diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease in a group of patients with a moderately high prevalence of disease. However, combined variables from each test are needed to provide reliable diagnostic accuracy.

Coronary Circulation↗
PubMed2006

The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph.

PURPOSE: Scanning laser tomography with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) has been proposed as a useful diagnostic test for glaucoma. This study was conducted to evaluate the quality of reporting of published studies using the HRT for diagnosing glaucoma. METHODS: A validated Medline and hand search of English-language articles reporting on measures of diagnostic accuracy of the HRT for glaucoma was performed. Two reviewers selected and appraised the papers independently. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of each publication. RESULTS: A total of 29 articles were included. Interobserver rating agreement was observed in 83% of items (kappa=0.76). The number of STARD items properly reported ranged from 5 to 18. Less than a third of studies (7/29) explicitly reported more than half of the STARD items. Descriptions of key aspects of the methodology were frequently missing. For example, the design of the study (prospective or retrospective) was reported in 6 of 29 studies, and details of participant sampling (e.g., consecutive or random selection) were described in 5 of 29 publications. The commonest description of diagnostic accuracy was sensitivity and specificity (25/29) followed by area under the ROC curve (13/29), with 9 of 29 publications reporting both. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy tests for glaucoma with HRT is suboptimal. The STARD initiative may be a useful tool for appraising the strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Databases, Factual↗