Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “VACCINATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

[Measles vaccination with split vaccines and living vaccines (author's transl)].

Two vaccination groups were observed over four years. One group received multiple preliminary vaccinations with measles split vaccine and were subsequently immunised with measles live vaccine. The second group received live vaccine only. The protection from the live vaccine, with and without the preliminary vaccination, must be considered very good, while the protection of a preliminary vaccination with split vaccine is only sufficiently effective for 1 1/2 to 2 years. All children-whether pre-vaccinated with split vaccine or not-should be protected against measles with live vaccine from the second year of life.

Age Factors↗

Concomitant administration of a bivalent Haemophilus influenzae type b-hepatitis B vaccine, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine: safety, tolerability and immunogenicity.

BACKGROUND: The study was done to verify that concomitant administration of a bivalent Haemophilus influenzae type b-hepatitis B vaccine (Comvax), measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (M-M-RII) and varicella vaccine (Varivax) would be well-tolerated and suitably immunogenic with respect to all vaccine antigens. METHODS: We randomized 822 healthy 12- to 15-month-old children (1:1) to receive concomitant injections of Comvax, M-M-RII and Varivax (concomitant group) or Comvax followed 6 weeks later by injections of M-M-RII and Varivax (nonconcomitant group). Blood samples taken before and 6 weeks after vaccination were tested for antibodies to all vaccine antigens. RESULTS: Vaccinations were generally well-tolerated. Children in the concomitant and nonconcomitant treatment groups were similar with respect to the safety endpoint of primary interest (16.1 and 19.5%, respectively, had a fever > or =103 degree F rectally at any time within 14 days after either of two clinic visits). Fifteen serious adverse events were reported (eight in the concomitant group and seven in the nonconcomitant group); all resolved. Elements of two serious adverse events (fever, fever and measles-like rash; both in concomitant group children) were considered possibly related to vaccination. One child was withdrawn from the study because of a nonserious adverse event subsequently judged to be unrelated to vaccination. Similar proportions of vaccinees in the concomitant and nonconcomitant groups developed satisfactory antibody responses to the H. influenzae polysaccharide, polyribosylribitol phosphate (97.8 to 98.7%), hepatitis B surface antigen (99.2 to 100%), measles virus (99.4 to 99.6%), mumps virus (98.4 to 99.2%), rubella virus (100%) and varicella virus (93.2 to 94.6%). CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of Comvax, M-M-RII and VARIVAX at the 12- or 15-month clinic visit is one satisfactory way of delivering some of the multiple vaccines indicated during the second year of life.

Antibodies, Viral↗

Virosomal influenza vaccine: a safe and effective influenza vaccine with high efficacy in elderly and subjects with low pre-vaccination antibody titers.

In 14 clinical studies, various efficacy and safety aspects of a new virosomal influenza vaccine (Invivac) were assessed in 2865 subjects. The virosomal influenza vaccine fully complies with the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) requirement for immunogenicity of influenza vaccines. In particular, in a subset of subjects with low pre-vaccination titers (thus those persons who actually need protection by a vaccine), between 76 and 99% of subjects (dependent on age, health status and vaccine components) achieved protective hemagglutination inhibiting (HI) antibody titers after vaccination with the virosomal influenza vaccine. Acceptable frequencies of well-known local and systemic reactions were observed in healthy adults and risk subjects in clinical studies and in a post-marketing study population. These reactions were transient and generally not severe, and did not cause major inconvenience. In conclusion, Invivac is an efficacious and safe vaccine for the protection against influenza in healthy and chronically ill adult subjects. The vaccine is especially efficacious in subjects with low pre-vaccination immunity.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of two kinds of smallpox vaccine: CVI-78 and calf lymph vaccine. II. Clinical and serologic observations of response to revaccination with calf lymph vaccine.

Revaccination with standard calf lymph vaccine was performed on 26 children who had received a primary vaccination with an attenuated smallpox vaccine, CVI-78, and 22 children who had received primary vaccination with standard calf lymph. Revaccination resulted in a vesicular reaction in 96 percent of those who had been vaccinated previously with CVI-78 and 73 percent of those vaccinated previously with standard calf lymph. All children had a positive hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titer either after primary vaccination or revaccination. Only 65 percent of those initially vaccinated with CVI-78 vaccine had positive neutralizing antibodies after revaccination. All children who received primary vaccination with standard calf lymph had postrevaccination neutralizing antibodies. The children who had neither a dermal nor a serologic response after primary vaccination responded as primary vaccinees on challenge with standard calf lymph.

Animals↗

[The immunogenicity of vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio administered orally on the vaccinal calendar at the age of 2, 4 and 6 months and their coadministration with a hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 2 and 6 months].

The immunogenicity of oral diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, (DPT) and polio vaccines was examined. Six hundred seventy-seven children (Group I) were given hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 2, and 6 months of age and the oral DPT-polio vaccines were administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. A control group of 731 children (Group II) received only oral DPT-polio vaccines. In both groups the vaccine efficacy against poliomyelitis was 96% for serotype I and 100% for serotype II. For serotype III, the vaccine efficacy was 98% and 97% for groups I and II, respectively. In both groups 97% of the children had antibodies against B. pertussis and all children were positive for tetanus and diphtheria. No immune interference between the oral DPT and polio vaccines and the hepatitis B vaccine when they were given simultaneously could be demonstrated as the immune response to the DPT and polio vaccines were identical in both groups. It can be concluded that the simultaneous administration of the hepatitis B vaccine with the DPT and polio vaccines did not interfere with the immune response to the other antigens.

Administration, Oral↗

Poliomyelitis prevention in the United States: introduction of a sequential vaccination schedule of inactivated poliovirus vaccine followed by oral poliovirus vaccine. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

These revised recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) replace recommendations on poliomyelitis issued in 1982 and 1987, and present a new ACIP poliovirus vaccination policy that increases reliance on inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). This change in policy is the most substantive since the introduction of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in 1961. ACIP has determined that the risk-benefit ratio associated with the exclusive use of OPV for routine immunization has changed because of rapid progress in global polio eradication efforts. In particular, the relative benefits of OPV to the U.S. population have diminished because of the elimination of wild-virus-associated poliomyelitis in the Western Hemisphere and the reduced threat of poliovirus importation into the United States. The risk for vaccine-associated poliomyelitis caused by OPV is now judged less acceptable because of the diminished risk for wild-virus-associated disease (indigenous or imported). Consequently, ACIP recommends a transition policy that will increase use of IPV and decrease use of OPV during the next 3-5 years. The revised recommendations include three options for poliovirus vaccination, all of which meet acceptable standards of care: sequential vaccination with IPV followed by OPV, OPV alone, or IPV alone. For overall public health benefit, ACIP recommends a sequential vaccination schedule of two doses of IPV followed by two doses of OPV for routine childhood vaccination. Vaccination schedules that include OPV alone or IPV alone are also acceptable and are preferred in some situations (e.g., IPV alone is recommended for children who are immunosuppressed; OPV alone is preferred for children who begin the primary vaccination schedule after 6 months of age). Implementation of these recommendations should reduce the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis and facilitate a transition to exclusive use of IPV following further progress in global polio eradication.

Adult↗

Vaccination of chickens against Marek's disease with the turkey herpesvirus vaccine using a pneumatic vaccinator.

A pneumatic vaccinator has been successfully used to administer cell-associated turkey herpesvirus (HVT) vaccine without a loss in titer due to the pressure required to administer the vaccine. Laboratory studies have also shown that chickens vaccinated with graded doses of the HVT vaccine using doses as low as 41 PFU offered protection against Marek's disease (MD) when compared to the unvaccinated controls. The pneumatic vaccinator has also been successful in administering a combination of HVT vaccine and tissue culture fowl pox vaccine. Vaccinated birds were protected against challenge with virulent MD virus as well as fowl pox virus. Antibiotics such as spectinomycin pentahydrate or lincomycin hydrochloride monohydrate and spectinomycin sulfate tetrahydrate were used in combination with the HVT and fowl pox vaccine and none of the antibiotics appear to have an adverse effect on the efficacy of either vaccine.

Animals↗

Simultaneous administration of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine with acellular or whole-cell pertussis vaccine: effects on reactogenicity and immune responses to pertussis vaccines.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of simultaneous Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate (Hib) vaccination on the safety and immunogenicity of selected acellular (DTaP) and whole-cell (DTP) pertussis vaccines with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids combined. METHODS: Enrollment of infants into a large multicenter study of the safety and immunogenicity of 13 DTaP and 2 DTP vaccines was partially completed when the first Hib vaccine, HbOC (Haemophilus b oligosaccharide conjugate vaccine), was licensed for use in infants. Thereafter, at each immunization most infants received HbOC simultaneously with DTaP (or DTP), administered in opposite thighs. Postvaccination geometric mean titers or concentrations (GMTs) of pertussis antibodies as measured by six different assays were compared pairwise among groups of infants receiving 0, 1, 2, or 3 simultaneous HbOC immunizations. The incidence of reactions was compared between infants who received only DTaP or DTP and those who received HbOC simultaneously. RESULTS: Comparison of postvaccination GMTs was possible among groups of infants receiving different numbers of simultaneous immunizations for 10 of the 13 DTaP and both DTP vaccines. Increased HbOC exposure had no consistent dose-response effect on antibody titers for DTaP or DTP vaccines in any assay. Significant differences between groups in postvaccination GMTs were observed with 4 DTaP vaccines in 1 to 2 assays each; the GMTs were higher with increasing HbOC exposure for 2 DTaP vaccines and lower for 2 others. There was no significant increase in reactions with simultaneous HbOC and DTaP immunization. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these retrospective analyses, there did not seem to be an interference in pertussis immunogenicity or alteration in reactogenicity associated with the simultaneous administration of HbOC and DTaP. These findings are encouraging with respect to the development of DTaP-Hib combination vaccines.

Bacterial Proteins↗

[The coverage of vaccines systematically administered and of a vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b prior to its inclusion in the vaccinal calendar in the Valencian Community].

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the vaccine coverage among children two years of age in the Community of Valencia, Spain, in 1997. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cluster sampling was used to assess vaccine coverage. Clusters were villages randomized according to their population < 5 years of age. At least 7 children of each of the 30 selected clusters were randomly selected from the database of newborn metabolic screening. Parents were contacted and vaccine registration cards requested by mail. RESULTS: Four hundred forty subjects were selected. Eight percent of the families had moved and were not contacted. Sixty-nine percent participated in the study. Coverage for three doses of DTP was 97.8% and 87.6% for four doses. MMR vaccine coverage was 96.6% and three doses of hepatitis B had been given in 95.1%. H. influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine coverage was 57%. In 70% of the studied cases of non-participants, vaccine coverage was known through vaccination centers and was very similar to that of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine coverage in the Community of Valencia is high for the scheduled vaccines. Although Hib is not a scheduled vaccination, its coverage was 57%.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of concurrent administration of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (meningococcal protein conjugate) with either measles-mumps-rubella vaccine or diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and oral poliovirus vaccines in 14- to 23-month-old infants.

In 1985, the first capsular polysaccharide (polyribosylribitol-phosphate [PRP]) vaccine for Haemophilus influenzae type b was licensed and recommended for routine use in children between 24 and 60 months of age. In the United States, approximately 75% to 90% of invasive disease due to H influenzae type b occurs in infants younger than 24 months, a population for whom H influenzae type b polysaccharide vaccine is inadequately immunogenic and protective. In an effort to enhance the immunogenicity of H influenzae type b polysaccharide vaccine for children in the most susceptible age groups, conjugate vaccines have been developed in which the capsular PRP of H influenzae type b has been bound to a variety of carrier proteins, thereby conferring the vaccines with thymic-dependent attributes. One such conjugate vaccine, in which the carrier protein is diphtheria toxoid (PRP-D), was licensed in 1987 and has been recommended since 1988 for routine use in children 18 months of age and older. A second conjugate vaccine, in which an oligosaccharide derivative of H influenzae type b capsular PRP is coupled to CRM, a nontoxic mutant diphtheria toxin (oligo-CRM), was licensed in 1988 and is a sanctioned alternative to PRP-D. Another investigational conjugate vaccine, in which the polysaccharide is linked to the outer membrane protein of Neisseria meningitidis group B (PRP-OMPC), has been demonstrated to be both safe and immunogenic when administered in a two-dose schedule to 2- to 6-month-old infants. However, anti-PRP antibody levels decline significantly during the ensuing 10 to 15 months; they rise significantly in response to booster doses of either PRP or PRP-OMPC administered 10 to 15 months after the initial priming doses of PRP-OMPC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

Measles vaccine efficacy during an outbreak in a highly vaccinated population: incremental increase in protection with age at vaccination up to 18 months.

During a large measles outbreak in Quebec City in 1989, two investigations conducted in parallel evaluated the relative risk of measles and measles vaccine effectiveness with respect to age at vaccination. The study was a school-based case-control study including 563 cases and 1126 classmate controls. The second was a cohort study of the siblings of school cases including 493 siblings aged between 1 and 19 years. The relative risks (RR) of measles were similar in both settings and the trend towards increased vaccine efficacy with increasing age at vaccination was highly significant (P < 0.001). Vaccine efficacy rose from 85% in children vaccinated at 12 months of age to > or = 94% in those vaccinated at 15 months and older. Even for children vaccinated at or after 18 months of age, the RR of measles was reduced when compared with children vaccinated between 15 and 17 months of age (RR 0.61, CI 95% 0.33-1.15). Small changes in the timing of initial measles vaccination can have a major impact on vaccine efficacy.

Age Distribution↗

An ELISA suitable for the detection of rabies virus antibodies in serum samples from human vaccinated with either cell-culture vaccine or suckling-mouse-brain vaccine.

An indirect ELISA for determination of post-vaccination rabies antibody was applied. Purified rabies virus was used as antigen to coat plates, and staphylococcal protein A linked with horseradish peroxidase was used for detecting IgG antibody in human sera. Sera from humans, vaccinated with cell-culture vaccine or suckling-mouse-brain vaccine, were examined. ELISA results were compared to those obtained from the virus neutralization test. The mean and standard deviation of OD were determined for 126 negative sera (pre-vaccination) and for 73 sera from vaccinated persons showing antibody titers lower than 0.5 IU/ml. Results were defined as ELISA -positive, -negative or -doubtful. Establishment of a doubtful region reduced the number of sera otherwise classified as positive (false-positive sera). In this way, the sensitivity, specificity and agreement values were respectively 87.5%, 92.4% and 88.5%. No significant differences were observed in these values when the group vaccinated with cell-culture vaccine and the group vaccinated with suckling-mouse-brain vaccine were compared. It was shown that much of the disagreement between the values obtained by neutralization test and ELISA occurred in sera obtained at the beginning of the immunization process, and was probably due to the presence of IgM in the serum samples, detected only by the former test. This ELISA method can be used as a screening test in rabies laboratories regardless of the kind of vaccine used for immunization.

Animals↗

Two trials of an acellular DTP vaccine in comparison with a whole-cell DTP vaccine in infants: evaluation of two PT doses and two vaccination schedules.

The present trials being carried out in Switzerland and Turkey, the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of acellular DTP vaccines containing either 25 micrograms or 8 micrograms of PT and 25 micrograms of FHA were compared with those of a conventional whole-cell DTP vaccine during a primary vaccination course following either a 0-1-2 schedule starting at three months of age (Switzerland) or a 0-2-4 schedule starting at two months of age (Turkey). The whole-cell vaccine was associated with significantly more local reactions than the acellular vaccines; general reactions were also more frequent among whole-cell recipients. The 25 micrograms PT dose vaccine was no more reactogenic than the 8 micrograms PT dose vaccine. There was no evidence of increases in frequencies of local or general reactions from one acellular vaccine dose to the next. The 25 micrograms PT dose acellular DTP vaccine resulted in immune responses to all four antigens (PT, FHA, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids) at least equivalent to those observed with whole-cell vaccination. Significantly lower anti-PT antibody levels were seen with the 8 micrograms PT dose vaccine.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

Relation between pre-vaccination and post-vaccination tuberculin sensitivity. A contribution to the ecology of BCG vaccination.

BCG vaccination is commonly assessed in terms of post-vaccination sensitivity to tuberculin. If vaccination is followed by the development of a high degree of tuberculin sensitivity, it is assumed that the vaccination was successful. If, on the other hand, tuberculin sensitivity does not develop, it is assumed that the vaccination was unsuccessful. Both these assumptions equate post-vaccination tuberculin sensitivity with BCG-induced tuberculin sensitivity and disregard the possibility that environmental factors, such as the prevalence of low-grade naturally acquired tuberculin sensitivity, may affect the outcome of vaccination. Thus, while it seems reasonable to equate post-vaccination and BCG-induced tuberculin sensitivity in areas where low-grade sensitivity is uncommon, it might be unjustifiable to do so in areas where such sensitivity is prevalent.This paper analyses the relation between pre- and post-vaccination tuberculin sensitivity in a community with a high prevalence of naturally acquired low-grade tuberculin sensitivity. From this analysis it appears that post-vaccination tuberculin sensitivity may be only partly BCG-induced and cannot therefore be considered a reliable measure of the success of BCG vaccination in the presence of naturally acquired low-grade sensitivity. The author discusses the implications of this finding and concludes that a further evaluation of the protection afforded by BCG in areas where low-grade tuberculin sensitivity is prevalent is much needed.

Adolescent↗

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a novel hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine compared to separate concomitant injections of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines, when administered according to a 3, 5 and 11 month vaccination schedule.

UNLABELLED: In an open randomised trial, 312 eligible infants were enrolled to receive either a single injection of the hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio/ Haemophilus influenzae b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine, or concomitant injections of commercial DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines (comparator). Vaccines were administered at 3, 5 and 11 months of age. The statistical approach for non-inferiority showed that the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was at least as immunogenic as the comparator vaccines in terms of immunogenicity of all antigens 1 month after the 2nd dose. Non-inferiority criteria were also met immediately before and 1 month after the 3rd dose for all antigens except poliovirus type 3 prior to the 3rd dose. The majority of subjects were seroprotected against diphtheria, tetanus, polyribosyl-ribitol-phosphate, hepatitis B and poliovirus after the 2nd dose and maintained seroprotective antibody levels until the 3rd dose. A marked difference was observed in anti-HBs antibody geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs) at 1 month after the 2nd dose (higher GMCs in DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib group). Reactogenicity (incidence of solicited local and general symptoms) was similar between the two study groups and no vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: the new diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio/ Haemophilus influenzae b vaccine administered at 3, 5 and 11 months of age was safe and at least as immunogenic as the comparator vaccines thus providing an effective and more comfortable option for this infant vaccination schedule.

Bacterial Capsules↗

Immunogenicity study of a combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine used to reconstitute a freeze-dried Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-IPV//PRP-T) administered simultaneously with a hepatitis B vaccine at two, three and four months of life.

This study was designed to assess the immunogenicity of a vaccine combining diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis vaccine, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine reconstituting Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus protein (DTaP-IPV//PRP-T; Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Lyon, France) administered simultaneously in association with hepatitis B vaccine (RECOMBIVAX (¿trade mark omitted¿) Merck, Sharp & Dohme, West Point, PA, USA) for the primary immunization of infants. The vaccines were administered at two, three and four months of age. One hundred and sixty-two healthy infants, aged 8-10 weeks, were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were taken before the first dose and 4 weeks after the third dose. The infants were observed for 15 minutes after vaccination for any immediate reaction. Adverse events requiring a medical consultation were recorded by the parents in a diary over the 7 days following vaccination. Four weeks after the third immunization, the percentages of infants fulfilling seroconversion criteria were 98.9% for pertussis toxin, 95.9% for filamentous haemagglutinin, 100.0% for tetanus, 100.0% for diphtheria, 99.3% for poliovirus type 1, 100.0% for both poliovirus types 2 and 3, 98.0% for Haemophilus influenzae type b, and 100% for hepatitis B surface antigen. No vaccine-related serious adverse event was reported. The simultaneous administration of DTaP-IPV//PRP-T and hepatitis B vaccines at two, three and four months of age yielded clinically satisfactory immune responses to all antigens compared with historical controls and gave a good safety profile.

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine↗