Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “TOXINS AND ANTITOXINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

[Antitoxic properties of monoclonal antibodies against diphtheria toxin].

Antitoxin properties of monoclonal antibodies to diphtheria toxin were studied in chick fibroblast culture and during the dermonecrotic tests in guinea pigs. Antitoxic properties were shown for antibodies specific to B subunit of the toxin but not for the ones specific to a subunit. The mixture of monoclonal B subunit specific antibodies reveals a higher neutralizing activity as compared with the activity produced by any single monoclonal antibody tested. The protective activity demonstrated by antibodies is connected with the preventing of toxin molecules fixation on the cellular receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Alternatives in testing of bacterial toxins and antitoxins.

The potency of several novel toxin-derived biological therapeutic products now in routine medical use is determined exclusively by in vivo methods. In addition, large numbers of animals continue to be used for the potency and safety testing of therapeutic antitoxins. There is thus an increasing need to develop acceptable alternative assays for toxicity testing which would reduce the need for a mouse lethality assay in quality control. Scientific advances in the understanding of the mode of action of clostridial neurotoxins have now provided the basis for improving conventional testing procedures for both therapeutic toxins and antitoxins.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2002

Rapid induction and reversal of a bacteriostatic condition by controlled expression of toxins and antitoxins.

RelE and ChpAK (MazF) toxins of Escherichia coli have previously been described as proteins that mediate efficient cell killing. We show here that induction of relE or chpAK transcription does not confer cell killing but, instead, induces a static condition in which the cells are still viable but unable to proliferate. Later induction of transcription of the antitoxin genes relB or chpAI fully reversed the static condition induced by RelE and ChpAK respectively. We also provide a mechanistic explanation for these findings. Thus, induction of relE transcription severely inhibited translation, whereas induction of chpAK transcription inhibited both translation and replication. Hence, most likely, lack of colony formation is due to inhibition of translation in the case of relE and inhibition of translation and/or replication in the case of chpAK. Consistent with this proposal, later induction of transcription of the cognate antitoxin genes simultaneously reversed cell stasis and the inhibitory effects of RelE and ChpAK on macromolecular syntheses. These results preclude that RelE and ChpAK mediate cell killing during the conditions used here. In vivo and in vitro analyses of a mutant RelE protein supported that inhibition of colony formation was due to inhibition of translation.

Bacterial Toxins↗
PubMed1984

Antitoxin levels in botulism patients treated with trivalent equine botulism antitoxin to toxin types A, B, and E.

Serum levels of equine-botulism antitoxin to toxin types A, B, and E were measured in four type-A botulism patients who had received equine-botulism antitoxin. High circulating levels capable of neutralizing in excess of 1 X 10(8), 9 X 10(7), and 6 X 10(6) 50% mouse lethal doses of toxin of types A, B, and E, respectively, were detected. There was little depletion of type-A antitoxin even though two of the patients had circulating type-A toxin before treatment. The half-life for antitoxin persistence for one patient was calculated as being 6.5, 7.6, and 5.3 days for antitoxin types A, B, and E, respectively. Antitoxin levels were not proportionate to the amount (range, 2-4 vials) injected and did not appear to be affected by whether the route of administration was iv or im. Peak serum levels of antitoxin were 10-1,000 times higher than amounts needed to neutralize the toxin measured in the serum of these and other patients with botulism.

Botulinum Antitoxin↗
PubMed1986

In vitro assays for botulinum toxin and antitoxins.

Clostridium botulinum produces several powerful neuroparalytic toxins which, although rare in food-poisoning instances, are generally fatal. A considerable amount of effort has therefore been made by the food industry to ensure that food treatment processes adequate to prevent growth and toxin production by Cl. botulinum. Laboratory mice and guinea-pigs are presently used extensively both for the assay of botulinum toxins and for the development and assessment of vaccines used to protect laboratory workers. An amplified ELISA, using a monoclonal antibody, has been developed for botulinum type A toxin with a sensitivity similar to that of the mouse acute toxicity test. The immunoassay has been found to be applicable to the detection of toxin in foodstuffs and could replace the currently used mouse bioassay in many laboratories. Immunoassays have also been developed for the detection of antibodies to botulinum toxins. A preliminary study has shown that antibody titres to botulinum types A and B toxins in sera taken from immunised personnel, as measured by ELISA, showed limited correlation with those measured by the toxin neutralisation test in mice. A more extensive study should determine whether the latter test can be replaced by the ELISA.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1976

Antigenic relationships on the diphtheria toxin molecule: antitoxin versus antitoxoid.

We used the mouse to produce antisera to native diphtheria toxin and diphtheria toxoid. With these antisera it was possible to distinguish between toxin and toxoid. By gel diffusion analysis, antitoxin detected antigenic determinants on toxin which were not available on toxoid, indicating that some determinants had been lost or altered by formalin treatment. Antitoxoid, on the other hand, showed reactions of identity between toxin and toxoid in gel diffusion. The toxin neutralization titers measured in tissue culture were the same for both antisera. Only antitoxin neutralized the adenosine 5'-diphosphate ribosyl-transferase activity of fragment A, but suprisingly both antisera had significant anti-fragment A titers when tested by passive hemagglutination. It is suggested that some of the anti-fragment A activity in antitoxin affects the enzyme active site, whereas that in antitoxoid does not, implying the existence of a least two independent antigenic regions on fragment A.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Alternatives to the use of animals for bacterial toxins and antitoxins.

The potency of several novel botulinum toxin-derived biological therapeutic products now in routine medical use is determined exclusively by in vivo methods. In addition, large numbers of animals continue to be used for the potency and safety testing of therapeutic antitoxins and toxoid vaccines. There is thus an increasing need to develop acceptable alternative assays for toxicity testing of clostridia neurotoxins which could be applied to different toxin derived therapeutic agents, including vaccines. Scientific advances in the understanding of the mode of action of clostridial neurotoxins have now provided the basis for improving conventional testing procedures.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗