SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It is known that coadministration of a statin and certain drugs that inhibit cytochrome P-450 may inhibit catabolism of statin, resulting in an increased concentration of statin in the blood and consequently, increased risk of certain side effects, e.g. myopathy. The aim of this study was to establish, for the first time, how many patients in Croatia concomitantly take statins with other drugs, and which drugs. Also, the aim was to determine how often statins are administered concomitantly with cytochrome P-450 inhibitors, and how many patients taking statin are therefore at increased risk of interactions and/or side effects. The data were collected from general practitioners' health records all over Croatia during July and August 2004. The data for patients who were prescribed any statin between June 1, 2003 and June 1, 2004 were analysed. The records of 882 patients were analysed, 446 (50.6%) women, 422 (47.8%) men and 14 (1.6%) of unidentified sex. The average age of women on statin was 65 years and of men 60 years. Of 882 patients, 772 patients (82%) were taking at least one more drug concurrently with statin. Of that number, 24% of patients concomitantly were taking one more drug, 20% two more drugs, 16% three more drugs, 10% four more drugs, 8% five more drugs and 3% six more drugs. The average number of other drugs prescribed together with statin was 2.1 +/- 1.59 in men and 2.2 +/- 1.71 in women. The average age of patients who were taking another drug together with a statin did not significantly differ from that of patients receiving only statin. There were regional differences in the number of drugs prescribed together with a statin. In Osijek, the average number of drugs prescribed with a statin was 2.4 +/- 1.80, in Zagreb 2.2 +/- 1.64, in Rijeka 2.0 +/- 1.60, and in Split 1.8 +/- 1.44. The number of drugs prescribed with a statin in rural areas was 2.0 +/- 1.58, in urban areas 2.1 +/- 1.63 and in semi-urban areas 2.8 +/- 1.85. The therapeutic groups of drugs that are most frequently prescribed with a statin in Croatia are ACE inhibitors and their fixed combinations (32%), beta-receptor blockers and their fixed combinations (23%), selective calcium channel blockers (18%), anxiolytics (18%), vasodilators and organic nitrates (16%), antirheumatic drugs (11%), oral antidiabetics (11%), vitamin K antagonists, analgesics-antipyretics, diuretics (10%), antibiotics (8%), and angiotensin II antagonists and their fixed combinations (5%). All other drugs accounted for less than 5%. Four percent of the patients take cytochrome P-450 inhibitors concomitantly with a statin. The most frequently used drug is verapamil, combination of verapamil and trandolapril, clarithromycin and diltiazem. Consequently, 3% of men and 5% of women are at increased risk of side effects. This sex difference is, however, not statistically significant. Patients between 70 and 74 years of age taking statins are in Croatia at the highest risk of interactions because 8% of them take concomitantly cytochrome P 450 inhibitors.
CONTEXT: The secondary prevention benefit of therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) has been clearly demonstrated; however, the role of early initiation of statins after acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of early statin initiation (< or = 7 days) after ACS with 90-day and 1-year outcomes. DESIGN: Observational cohort from databases of 2 randomized clinical trials, SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY. SETTING: Nine hundred thirty-one clinical centers in 37 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 12,365 ACS patients randomized from August 1997 to August 1999 who were not taking statins prior to the index ACS and who either started statin therapy early (median, 2.0 [interquartile range, 1.0-3.1] days after ACS; n = 3952) or survived more than 5 days after ACS and never received statin therapy (n = 8413). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ninety-day incidence of death; death or myocardial infarction (MI); and death, MI, or severe recurrent ischemia; as well as 1-year incidence of death. RESULTS: Ninety-day and 1-year unadjusted mortality comparison suggested early statin benefit (1.2% for early statins vs 2.1% for no statins; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.81 for 90-day comparisons and 2.3% for early statins vs 4.4% for no statins; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.68 for 1-year comparison). However, no benefit was evident for 90-day death or MI (6.5% vs 6.9%; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.11) or death, MI, or severe recurrent ischemia (9.2% vs 8.9%; HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.18). After propensity and covariate adjustment, there were no 90-day or 1-year differences between the early-statin group and the no-statin group. The 90-day adjusted HR for death was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.75-1.56); for death or MI, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.91-1.29); and for death, MI, or severe recurrent ischemia, 1.15 (95% CI, 0.99-1.34). One-year mortality-adjusted HR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.73-1.33). Among 2711 patients with core laboratory lipid analysis, early statin was associated with higher adjusted risk for death or death or MI at cholesterol levels below treatment guidelines but was more favorable at higher levels. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no relationship between early initiation of statin therapy and improved outcomes although our subset analysis suggests that outcomes after early statin initiation may vary with cholesterol levels. Confirmation of early treatment effects of statins on outcomes awaits the results of adequately powered randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Women are often not treated as aggressively as men to control levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), despite evidence that women and men realize comparable cardiovascular benefit from lipid-lowering therapy. Statins are the most effective drugs currently available for treating hypercholesterolemia. Despite the impressive cholesterol-lowering capacity of statins, however, many patients on statin therapy fail to reach established target levels of LDL-C. The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, blocks the intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol, a mechanism of action complementary to that of statins, which inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis. Ezetimibe coadministered with statins produces significant incremental reductions in LDL-C compared with statin monotherapy. METHODS: Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced-parallel group trials compared the efficacy and safety of statin monotherapy (lovastatin or pravastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg; simvastatin or atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg) vs. ezetimibe 10 mg plus statin (as above). A gender subset analysis (women, n = 1065; men, n = 796) on data pooled across these four trials was carried out to determine whether ezetimibe plus statin for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia is equally efficacious in women and men. RESULTS: Compared with statin monotherapy, ezetimibe plus statin demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing blood levels of LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The beneficial effects of ezetimibe were comparable in women and men. The safety profile of subjects receiving ezetimibe plus statin was similar to that of patients receiving statin monotherapy and similar between the two sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe plus statin was more effective than statin alone in improving the lipid profile of patients with hypercholesterolemia and was equally efficacious in women and men. Ezetimibe plus statin was well tolerated and had a favorable safety profile in both patient subgroups. Ezetimibe coadministered with statins, a dual inhibition treatment strategy that targets both cholesterol absorption and synthesis, is an effective therapeutic option for women with hypercholesterolemia.
BACKGROUND: The Ezetimibe Add-on to Statin for Effectiveness (EASE) trial examined the effectiveness and safety profile of ezetimibe (EZE) added to ongoing statin therapy in 3030 patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels exceeding National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP 111) goals. OBJECTIVE: Because people aged > 65 years are at increased risk for development of coronary heart disease (CHD), these subgroup analyses of data from the EASE trial were conducted to determine the extent of change in LDL-C levels and attainment of NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals with the addition of EZE to ongoing statin therapy in patients aged 65 to 74 years (the older group) and > or = 75 years (the elderly group). METHODS: In the multicenter (299 sites), community-based, double-blind, placebo-controlled EASE trial, patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive EZE 10 mg/d or placebo in addition to their ongoing statin therapy for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percent reduction in LDL-C levels, and the principal secondary end point was the proportion of patients achieving NCEP ATP III target LDL-C levels. The effects of the addition of EZE on additional lipid and lipoprotein measures and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were also examined, as was tolerability. Study analyses were performed in the modified intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: This subgroup analysis included data from 841 patients in the older age group (579 EZE + statin, 262 placebo + statin), which constituted 27.8% of the overall EASE population, and 466 in the elderly group (307 EZE + statin, 159 placebo + statin), which constituted 15.4% of the overall EASE population. The former group included 436 (51.8%) men and 405 (48.2%) women, with a mean (SD) age of 69.2 (3.0) years; the latter group included 227 (48.7%) men and 239 (51.3%) women, with a mean age of 78.5 (3.2) years. The characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable at baseline. In the older group, 717 (85.3%) had CHD or a CHD risk equivalent, as did 421 (90.3%) of those in the elderly group. Thirty-two patients in the older group and 17 in the elderly group discontinued the study. The reasons for discontinuation included clinical adverse events (n = 23), withdrawal of consent (n = 15), loss to follow-up (n = 4), protocol deviation (n = 2), and other reasons (n = 5). EZE + statin significantly reduced LDL-C compared with placebo + statin (older group: mean [SE] treatment difference, -25.1% [1.4]; P < 0.001; elderly group: treatment difference, -22.0% [1.8]; P < 0.001). The LDL-Glowering effects of treatment were consistent in the 2 groups. EZE + statin therapy significantly improved other lipid parameters (triglycerides, non high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol, P < 0.001 in both age groups; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, P < 0.03 in the older group only) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels compared with EZE + placebo (P < 0.03). The attainment of LDL-C goals also was significantly increased with EZE + statin compared with placebo + statin (older group: 72.3% vs 18.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 14.59; 95% CI, 9.55 to 22.28; P < 0.001; elderly group: 73.3% vs 18.9%; OR = 13.44; 95% CI, 7.72 to 23.41; P < 0.001). EZE + statin therapy was well tolerated by patients in both age groups, with a safety profile comparable to that of placebo + statin. CONCLUSIONS: In these older and elderly patients, many of them at high risk for CHD, EZE added to ongoing statin therapy was well tolerated and was an effective treatment option for improving lipid profiles and attainment of LDL-C goals. Adding EZE improved rates of attainment of NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals without increases in the dose or potency of statin therapy. Further studies are necessary to determine whether these results can be generalized to other older and elderly populations.
Statins lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and are widely used for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether statin-induced low-density lipoprotein reduction increases risk of intracerebral haemorrhage has been debated for almost two decades. Here, we explored whether genetically predicted on-statin low-density lipoprotein response is associated with intracerebral haemorrhage risk using Mendelian randomization. Using genomic data from randomized trials, we derived a polygenic score from 35 single nucleotide polymorphisms of on-statin low-density lipoprotein response and tested it in the population-based UK Biobank. We extracted statin drug and dose information from primary care data on a subset of 225 195 UK Biobank participants covering a period of 29 years. We validated the effects of the genetic score on longitudinal low-density lipoprotein measurements with generalized mixed models and explored associations with incident intracerebral haemorrhage using Cox regression analysis. Statins were prescribed at least once to 75 973 (31%) of the study participants (mean 57 years, 55% females). Among statin users, mean low-density lipoprotein decreased by 3.45 mg/dl per year [95% confidence interval (CI): (-3.47, -3.42)] over follow-up. A higher genetic score of statin response [1 standard deviation (SD) increment] was associated with significant additional reductions in low-density lipoprotein levels [-0.05 mg/dl per year, (-0.07, -0.02)], showed concordant lipidomic effects on other lipid traits as statin use and was associated with a lower risk for incident myocardial infarction [hazard ratio per SD increment 0.98 95% CI (0.96, 0.99)] and peripheral artery disease [hazard ratio per SD increment 0.93 95% CI (0.87, 0.99)]. Over a 11-year follow-up period, a higher genetically predicted statin response among statin users was associated with higher intracerebral haemorrhage risk in a model adjusting for statin dose [hazard ratio per SD increment 1.16, 95% CI (1.05, 1.28)]. On the contrary, there was no association with intracerebral haemorrhage risk among statin non-users (P = 0.89). These results provide further support for the hypothesis that statin-induced low-density lipoprotein reduction may be causally associated with intracerebral haemorrhage risk. While the net benefit of statins for preventing vascular disease is well-established, these results provide insights about the personalized response to statin intake and the role of pharmacological low-density lipoprotein lowering in the pathogenesis of intracerebral haemorrhage.
BACKGROUND: Published studies regarding statin-associated myopathy may describe more dramatic patient presentations, potentially leading to inaccurate characterization of the condition. Furthermore, long-term outcomes and responses to statin rechallenge in patients with statin-associated myopathy are largely unknown. METHODS: The University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Medical Informatics Department identified 437 patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes potentially representing cases of statin-associated myopathy from more than 13 years of inpatient and outpatient data; 45 of these individuals were diagnosed as having statin-associated myopathy. Using a standardized form, 2 researchers abstracted all the case records to define the clinical course of statin-induced myopathy. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of statin therapy before symptom onset was 6.3 (9.8) months. Resolution of muscle pain occurred a mean (SD) of 2.3 (3.0) months after discontinuation of statin therapy. Six patients (13%) were hospitalized for the management of rhabdomyolysis; 2 had reversible renal dysfunction, and 1 with preexisting renal insufficiency subsequently began lifelong dialysis. Hospitalized patients developed myopathy more quickly after initiating statin therapy (1.3 vs 7.1 months; P = .048) and were more likely to be taking concomitant medications known to increase the risk of statin-associated myopathy (P = .03). Thirty-seven patients received another statin after an episode of statin-associated myopathy; 21 (57%) reported recurrent muscle pain, whereas 16 (43%) tolerated other statins without recurrent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with statin-associated myopathy experienced full resolution of muscle pain on cessation of statin therapy. Although no deaths occurred, 13% of the patients required hospitalization for rhabdomyolysis. Recurrent muscle pain was common on statin rechallenge.
CONTEXT: Whether statin therapy has beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between initiation of statin therapy and risks for death and hospitalization among adults with chronic heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Propensity-adjusted cohort study of adults diagnosed with heart failure who were eligible for lipid-lowering therapy but had no previous known statin use, within an integrated health care delivery system in northern California between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2004. Statin use was estimated from filled outpatient prescriptions in pharmacy databases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure during a median of 2.4 years of follow-up. We examined the independent relationships between statin therapy and risks for adverse events overall and stratified by the presence or absence of coronary heart disease after multivariable adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 24,598 adults diagnosed with heart failure who had no prior statin use, those initiating statin therapy (n = 12,648; 51.4%) were more likely to be younger, male, and have known cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension. There were 8235 patients who died. Using an intent-to-treat approach, incident statin use was associated with lower risks of death (age- and sex-adjusted rate of 14.5 per 100 person-years with statin therapy vs 25.3 per 100 person-years without statin therapy; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.80]) and hospitalization for heart failure (age- and sex-adjusted rate of 21.9 per 100 person-years with statin therapy vs 31.1 per 100 person-years without statin therapy; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.85]) even after adjustment for the propensity to take statins, cholesterol level, use of other cardiovascular medications, and other potential confounders. Incident statin use was associated with lower adjusted risks of adverse outcomes in patients with or without known coronary heart disease. CONCLUSION: Among adults diagnosed with heart failure who had no prior statin use, incident statin use was independently associated with lower risks of death and hospitalization among patients with or without coronary heart disease.
PURPOSE: Statins reduce cardiovascular events by more than can be explained by their effects on lipids. We conducted a systematic review of how statins affect vascular structure and function, differences among statins, and correlations between the effects of statins on vascular outcomes and either lipid levels or cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: We primarily searched MEDLINE (1980 to March 2004) to identify all studies with at least 10 subjects that reported the effects of currently available statins on coronary artery stenosis, carotid intima-media thickness, and endothelial function (excluding studies of drug combinations and subjects with organ transplants). Meta-analyses were performed when feasible. RESULTS: Statins decrease the progression and increase the regression of coronary artery lesions and luminal narrowing. Compared with placebo, statins decrease the likelihood of coronary artery restenosis (summary risk ratio = 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.77 to 0.95). Statins appear to slow the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness. Although the effect of statins on coronary endothelial function is uncertain, statins appear to improve peripheral endothelial function. There is no conclusive evidence to suggest that individual statins differ in their effects on these outcomes. Studies generally found weak or no correlation between the effects of statins on vascular outcomes and lipid levels. No study showed a correlation between vascular effect and clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Statins slow the progression of, and may reverse, atherosclerosis. The magnitude of these effects, however, is small compared with the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Statins also improve measures of vascular function, which may contribute to their clinical benefits. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that individual statins differ in their vascular effects.
BACKGROUND: Reports have demonstrated an association between statin therapy during the first day of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and reduced mortality. There are little data about whether early statin therapy reduces risk of CHF and alters timing of death. METHODS: We identified 3226 consecutive patients with AMI from 1993 through 2000 and divided them into early statin therapy (statins were administered within the initial 24 h of hospitalization, n=220) and non-statin therapy groups (n=3006). We compared mortality risks, rates of CHF development and measures of peak CK and CK-MB values between the groups. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was lower in the early statin therapy group (2.7%) compared to the non-statin therapy group (9.2%), p=0.001. We observed no differences in the median time to death (statin group 132 h vs. non-statin group 72 h), p=0.3. Patients with very early statin treatment had lower peak CK (624 ng/ml) and CK-MB (46 ng/ml) values compared to non-statin patients (848 ng/ml and 84 ng/ml), p<0.01. Patients in the early statin group had lower risks of developing CHF during hospitalization (10.2 %) compared to the non-statin group (25.7%), p<0.001. CONCLUSION: Very early administration of statin therapy during the first day of hospitalization for AMI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, lower rates of developing CHF and reduced peak biomarker release. These data support a benefit from early statin therapy in AMI and support the need for prospective studies which test whether very early statin therapy might also reduce infarct size.
BACKGROUND: Statins prolong survival in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events, however little is known regarding their efficacy and safety in patients with established chronic heart failure (CHF). To address this, we retrospectively analyzed the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) database to determine outcomes in CHF patients according to statin use at baseline. METHODS: Demographic characteristics of patients receiving statins at baseline (n=1602) were compared with those who were not (n=3048). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, with death as outcome, was used to assess the impact of statin therapy, with adjustment made for baseline differences in relevant parameters. RESULTS: Patients receiving statins at baseline were younger with fewer females, fewer in NYHA III-IV, more with an ischemic etiology, more diabetics, higher BMI, lower SBP, more on beta-blockers, but no difference in LVEF or ACEi use. Mortality over a mean 2-year follow-up was 17.9% on statins versus 20.3% without statins (p=0.029). Cox-adjusted hazard ratio for statins was 0.81 [95% CI 0.70-0.94]. No statistically significant interaction was found between statins and valsartan for mortality. After 4 months, the only laboratory changes were a reduction in CRP and an attenuation of the rise in norepinephrine in the statin group. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, contemporary sample of patients with CHF, statin use appeared to be associated with a lower 2-year mortality. These findings suggest a prognostic benefit for statins in established CHF, however prospective data are required to definitively address this issue. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: We examined major cardiovascular outcomes in patients who were (n=1602) and were not (n=3048) receiving statins at baseline in the Val-HeFT cohort of patients with mild to moderate systolic chronic heart failure. Mortality was reduced in patients receiving statins compared to those who were not, without any significant interaction effect between statin treatment and valsartan. These findings suggest a prognostic benefit for statins in established heart failure, however prospective data are required to definitively address this issue.
'Statins', drugs that lower cholesterol are widely used. Statins block cholesterol in the body and brain by inhibiting HMG-Co-A reductase. This pathway is shared by CoQ-10. An unintended consequence of the statins is lowering of CoQ-10. As CoQ-10 may play a role in PD, its possible statins may worsen PD. Such a report has appeared. Statins came into wide use in 1997-1998, 6 years before our study began. Thus 74% of our patients on a statin had a PD duration of 1-6 years versus 56% of our patients not on a statin. A direct comparison of patients on a statin and not on a statin would bias the study in favor of the statins: patients on a statin would have a shorter disease duration and less advanced PD. Therefore we divided the patients into two groups. Group I consisted of 128 patients on a statin, and 252 not on a statin who had PD for 1-6 years. In this group, disease severity (Hoehn & Yahr Stage), levodopa dose, Co-enzyme Q10 use, prevalence of 'wearing off', dyskinesia and dementia were similar. Group II consisted of 45 patients on a statin and 200 patients not on a statin who had PD for 7-22 years. In this group disease severity, levodopa dose, Co-enzyme Q10 use, prevalence of wearing off, dyskinesia and dementia were similar. Statins although they may affect Co-enzyme Q10 levels in the body and the brain, do not worsen PD at least as assessed by stage, and prevalence of wearing-off, dyskinesia, and dementia.
Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) are associated with skeletal muscle complaints, including clinically important myositis and rhabdomyolysis, mild serum creatine kinase (CK) elevations, myalgia with and without elevated CK levels, muscle weakness, muscle cramps, and persistent myalgia and CK elevations after statin withdrawal. We performed a literature review to provide a clinical summary of statin-associated myopathy and discuss possible mediating mechanisms. We also update the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports on statin-associated rhabdomyolysis. Articles on statin myopathy were identified via a PubMed search through November 2002 and articles on statin clinical trials, case series, and review articles were identified via a PubMed search through January 2003. Adverse event reports of statin-associated rhabdomyolysis were also collected from the FDA MEDWATCH database. The literature review found that reports of muscle problems during statin clinical trials are extremely rare. The FDA MEDWATCH Reporting System lists 3339 cases of statin-associated rhabdomyolysis reported between January 1, 1990, and March 31, 2002. Cerivastatin was the most commonly implicated statin. Few data are available regarding the frequency of less-serious events such as muscle pain and weakness, which may affect 1% to 5% of patients. The risk of rhabdomyolysis and other adverse effects with statin use can be exacerbated by several factors, including compromised hepatic and renal function, hypothyroidism, diabetes, and concomitant medications. Medications such as the fibrate gemfibrozil alter statin metabolism and increase statin plasma concentration. How statins injure skeletal muscle is not clear, although recent evidence suggests that statins reduce the production of small regulatory proteins that are important for myocyte maintenance.