Bilateral anophthalmia and brain malformations caused by a 20-bp deletion in the SOX2 gene.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abnormalities, Multiple↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Sox2”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Mutations within Sox2/SOX2 are associated with abnormalities in the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in mice and humans.
The transcription factor SOX2 is expressed most notably in the developing CNS and placodes, where it plays critical roles in embryogenesis. Heterozygous de novo mutations in SOX2 have previously been associated with bilateral anophthalmia/microphthalmia, developmental delay, short stature, and male genital tract abnormalities. Here we investigated the role of Sox2 in murine pituitary development. Mice heterozygous for a targeted disruption of Sox2 did not manifest eye defects, but showed abnormal anterior pituitary development with reduced levels of growth hormone, luteinizing hormone, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Consequently, we identified 8 individuals (from a cohort of 235 patients) with heterozygous sequence variations in SOX2. Six of these were de novo mutations, predicted to result in truncated protein products, that exhibited partial or complete loss of function (DNA binding, nuclear translocation, or transactivation). Clinical evaluation revealed that, in addition to bilateral eye defects, SOX2 mutations were associated with anterior pituitary hypoplasia and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, variable defects affecting the corpus callosum and mesial temporal structures, hypothalamic hamartoma, sensorineural hearing loss, and esophageal atresia. Our data show that SOX2 is necessary for the normal development and function of the hypothalamo-pituitary and reproductive axes in both humans and mice.
Abnormalities, Multiple↗
Transcriptional dynamics of the embryonic stem cell switch.
Recent ChIP experiments of human and mouse embryonic stem cells have elucidated the architecture of the transcriptional regulatory circuitry responsible for cell determination, which involves the transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG. In addition to regulating each other through feedback loops, these genes also regulate downstream target genes involved in the maintenance and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. A search for the OCT4-SOX2-NANOG network motif in other species reveals that it is unique to mammals. With a kinetic modeling approach, we ascribe function to the observed OCT4-SOX2-NANOG network by making plausible assumptions about the interactions between the transcription factors at the gene promoter binding sites and RNA polymerase (RNAP), at each of the three genes as well as at the target genes. We identify a bistable switch in the network, which arises due to several positive feedback loops, and is switched on/off by input environmental signals. The switch stabilizes the expression levels of the three genes, and through their regulatory roles on the downstream target genes, leads to a binary decision: when OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG are expressed and the switch is on, the self-renewal genes are on and the differentiation genes are off. The opposite holds when the switch is off. The model is extremely robust to parameter changes. In addition to providing a self-consistent picture of the transcriptional circuit, the model generates several predictions. Increasing the binding strength of NANOG to OCT4 and SOX2, or increasing its basal transcriptional rate, leads to an irreversible bistable switch: the switch remains on even when the activating signal is removed. Hence, the stem cell can be manipulated to be self-renewing without the requirement of input signals. We also suggest tests that could discriminate between a variety of feedforward regulation architectures of the target genes by OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG.
Animals↗
Differential activity of the FGF-4 enhancer in F9 and P19 embryonal carcinoma cells.
Transcription factors Oct-3/4 and Sox2 behave as global regulators during mammalian embryogenesis. They work together by binding co-operatively to closely spaced HMG and POU motifs (HMG/POU cassettes). Recently, it was suggested that a critical Sox2:Oct-3/4 target gene, FGF-4, is expressed at lower levels in P19 than in F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, due to lower levels of Sox2 in P19 than in F9 cells. We tested this possibility to better understand how FGF-4 expression is modulated during development. Although we found that P19 EC cells express approximately 10-fold less FGF-4 mRNA than F9 EC cells, we determined that Sox2 levels do not differ markedly in F9 and P19 EC cells. We also determined that Sox2 and Oct-3/4 work together equally well in both EC cell lines. Moreover, in contrast to an earlier prediction based on in vitro binding studies, we demonstrate that the function of the HMG/POU cassettes of the FGF-4 and UTF1 genes does not differ significantly in these EC cell lines when tested in the context of a natural enhancer. Importantly, we determined that the FGF-4 promoter is highly responsive to a heterologous enhancer in both EC cell lines; whereas, the FGF-4 enhancer is 7- to 10-fold less active in P19 than in F9 EC cells. Because F9 and P19 EC cells are likely to represent cells at different stages of mammalian development, we suggest that this difference in FGF-4 enhancer activity may reflect a mechanism used to decrease, but not abolish, FGF-4 expression as the early embryo develops.
Animals↗
Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.
The transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG have essential roles in early development and are required for the propagation of undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture. To gain insights into transcriptional regulation of human ES cells, we have identified OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG target genes using genome-scale location analysis. We found, surprisingly, that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG co-occupy a substantial portion of their target genes. These target genes frequently encode transcription factors, many of which are developmentally important homeodomain proteins. Our data also indicate that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG collaborate to form regulatory circuitry consisting of autoregulatory and feedforward loops. These results provide new insights into the transcriptional regulation of stem cells and reveal how OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG contribute to pluripotency and self-renewal.
Animals↗
Serological identification of embryonic neural proteins as highly immunogenic tumor antigens in small cell lung cancer.
Serological analysis of expression cDNA libraries (SEREX) derived from two small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines using pooled sera of SCLC patients led to the isolation of 14 genes, including 4 SOX group B genes (SOX1, SOX2, SOX3, and SOX21) and ZIC2. SOX group B genes and ZIC2 encode DNA-binding proteins; SOX group B proteins regulate transcription of target genes in the presence of cofactors, whereas ZIC2 is also suspected to be a transcriptional regulator. These genes are expressed at early developmental stages in the embryonic nervous system, but are down-regulated in the adult. Although SOX2 mRNA can be detected in some adult tissues, ZIC2 is expressed only in brain and testis, and SOX1, SOX3, and SOX21 transcripts are not detectable in normal adult tissues. Of SCLC cell lines tested, 80% expressed ZIC2 mRNA, and SOX1, SOX2, and SOX3 expression was detected in 40%, 50%, and 10%, respectively. SOX group B and ZIC2 antigens elicited serological responses in 30-40% of SCLC patients in this series, at titers up to 1:10(6). In sera from 23 normal adults, no antibody was detected against SOX group B or ZIC2 proteins except for one individual with low-titer anti-SOX2 antibody. Seroreactivity against SOX1 and 2 was consistently higher titered than SOX3 and 21 reactivity, suggesting SOX1 and/or SOX2 as the main antigens eliciting anti-SOX responses. Although paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have been associated with several SCLC antigens, neurological symptoms have not been observed in patients with anti-SOX or anti-ZIC2 antibodies.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Comparative genomic and expression analysis of group B1 sox genes in zebrafish indicates their diversification during vertebrate evolution.
Group B1 Sox genes encode HMG domain transcription factors that play major roles in neural development. We have identified six zebrafish B1 sox genes, which include pan-vertebrate sox1a/b, sox2, and sox3, and also fish-specific sox19a/b. SOX19A/B proteins show a transcriptional activation potential that is similar to other B1 SOX proteins. The expression of sox19a and sox3 begins at approximately the 1,000-cell stage during embryogenesis and becomes confined to the future ectoderm by the shield stage. This is reminiscent of the epiblastic expression of Sox2 and/or Sox3 in amniotes. As development progresses, these six B1 sox genes display unique expression patterns that overlap distinctly from one region to another. sox19a expression is widespread in the early neuroectoderm, resembling pan-neural Sox2 expression in amniotes, whereas zebrafish sox2 shows anterior-restricted expression. Comparative genomics suggests that sox19a/b and mammalian Sox15 (group G) have an orthologous relationship and that the B1/G Sox genes arose from a common ancestral gene through two rounds of genome duplication. It seems likely, therefore, that each B1/G Sox gene has gained a distinct expression profile and function during vertebrate evolution.
Animals↗
Frizzled 5 signaling governs the neural potential of progenitors in the developing Xenopus retina.
Progenitors in the developing central nervous system acquire neural potential and proliferate to expand the pool of precursors competent to undergo neuronal differentiation. The formation and maintenance of neural-competent precursors are regulated by SoxB1 transcription factors, and evidence that their expression is regionally regulated suggests that specific signals regulate neural potential in subdomains of the developing nervous system. We show that the frizzled (Fz) transmembrane receptor Xfz5 selectively governs neural potential in the developing Xenopus retina by regulating the expression of Sox2. Blocking either Xfz5 or canonical Wnt signaling within the developing retina inhibits Sox2 expression, reduces cell proliferation, inhibits the onset of proneural gene expression, and biases individual progenitors toward a nonneural fate, without altering the expression of multiple progenitor markers. Blocking Sox2 function mimics these effects. Rescue experiments indicate that Sox2 is downstream of Xfz5. Thus, Fz signaling can regulate the neural potential of progenitors in the developing nervous system.
Animals↗
The transcription factor cSox2 and Neuropeptide Y define a novel subgroup of amacrine cells in the retina.
The retina has been extensively used as a model to study the mechanisms responsible for the production of different neural cell phenotypes. The importance of both extrinsic and intrinsic cues in these processes is now appreciated and numerous transcription factors have been identified which are required for both neuronal determination and cell differentiation. In this study we have analysed the expression of the transcription factor Sox2 during development of the chick retina. Expression was found in the proliferating cells of the retina during development and was down regulated by nearly all cell types as they started to differentiate and migrate to the different layers of the retina. In one cell type, however, Sox2 expression was retained after the cells have ceased division and migrated to their adult location. These cells formed two rows located on either side of the inner plexiform layer and were also positive for Neuropeptide Y, characteristics which indicate that they were a subpopulation of amacrine cells. The expression of Sox2 by only this population of post-mitotic neurones makes it possible to follow these cells as they migrate to their adult location and shows that they initially form a single row of cells which subsequently divides to form the double row seen in the adult tissue. We suggest that retained expression of Sox2 is involved in directing the differentiation of these cells and is an early marker of this cell type.
Amacrine Cells↗
SOX7 and GATA-4 are competitive activators of Fgf-3 transcription.
Fgf-3 is expressed in a dynamic and complex spatiotemporal pattern during mouse development. Previous studies identified GATA-4 as a transcription factor that binds the key regulatory element PS4A of the Fgf-3 promoter and stimulates transcription. Here we show that members of the SOX family of transcription factors also bind PS4A and differentially modulate transcription. At least five SOX genes, Sox2, Sox6, Sox7, Sox13, and Sox17, were expressed in F9 cells, and of these, Sox7 and Sox17 were dramatically induced in parallel with Fgf-3 following differentiation into parietal endoderm-like cells with retinoic acid and dibutyryl cAMP. Complexes could be detected on PS4A with SOX2, SOX7, and SOX17 by using nuclear extracts from differentiated F9 cells. However, only Sox7 expression markedly activated the Fgf-3 promoter in these cells. By contrast, SOX2 was a poor activator of Fgf-3 transcription, and when Sox2 was coexpressed with Gata4, it negatively modulated the strong activation mediated by GATA-4. More detailed analyses showed that SOX7 competes with GATA-4 for PS4A occupancy and to activate the Fgf-3 promoter. In situ hybridization analysis showed that Sox7 is co-expressed with Fgf-3 and Gata4 in the parietal endoderm of E7.5 mouse embryos. In culture, GATA-4-deficient embryonal stem cells were shown to express Fgf-3 upon differentiation into embryoid bodies, although at lower levels than were found in wild type embryonal stem cells. This Fgf-3 expression was virtually abolished when Sox7 expression was suppressed by RNA interference. These results show that SOX7 is a potent activator of Fgf-3 transcription.
Animals↗
Efficient identification of regulatory sequences in the chicken genome by a powerful combination of embryo electroporation and genome comparison.
Recently expanded knowledge of gene regulation clearly indicates that the regulatory sequences of a gene, usually identified as enhancers, are widely distributed in the gene locus, revising the classical view that they are clustered in the vicinity of genes. To identify regulatory sequences for Sox2 expression governing early neurogenesis, we scanned the 50-kb region of the chicken Sox2 locus for enhancer activity utilizing embryo electroporation, resulting in identification of a number of enhancers scattered throughout the analyzed genomic span. The 'pan-neural' Sox2 expression in early embryos is actually brought about by the composite activities of five separate enhancers with distinct spatio-temporal specificities. These and other functionally defined enhancers exactly correspond to extragenic sequence blocks that are conspicuously conserved between the chicken and mammalian genomes and that are embedded in sequences with a wide range of sequence conservation between humans and mice. The sequences conserved between amniotes and teleosts correspond to subregions of the enhancer subsets which presumably represent core motifs of the enhancers, and the limited conservation partly reflects divergent expression patterns of the gene. The phylogenic distance between the chicken and mammals appears optimal for identifying a battery of genetic regulatory elements as conserved sequence blocks, and chicken embryo electroporation facilitates functional characterization of these elements.
Animals↗
Pax6 autoregulation mediated by direct interaction of Pax6 protein with the head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer of the mouse Pax6 gene.
The Pax6 gene plays crucial roles in eye development and encodes a transcription factor containing both a paired domain and a homeodomain. During embryogenesis, Pax6 is expressed in restricted tissues under the direction of distinct cis-regulatory regions. The head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer of mouse Pax6 directs reporter expression in the derivatives of the ectoderm in the eye, such as lens and cornea, but the molecular mechanism of its control remains largely unknown. We identified a Pax6 protein-responsive element termed LE9 (52 bp in length) within the head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer. LE9, a sequence well conserved across vertebrates, acted as a highly effective enhancer in reporter analyses. Pax6 protein formed in vitro a complex with the distal half of LE9 in a manner dependent on the paired domain. The proximal half of the LE9 sequence contains three plausible sites of HMG domain recognition, and HMG domain-containing transcription factors Sox2 and Sox3 activated LE9 synergistically with Pax6. A scanning mutagenesis experiment indicated that the central site is most important among the three presumptive HMG domain recognition sites. Furthermore, Pax6 and Sox2 proteins formed a complex when they were expressed together. Based on these findings, we propose a model in which Pax6 protein directly and positively regulates its own gene expression, and Sox2 and Sox3 proteins interact with Pax6 protein, resulting in modification of the transcriptional activation by Pax6 protein.
Animals↗
Six3 activation of Pax6 expression is essential for mammalian lens induction and specification.
The homeobox gene Six3 regulates forebrain development. Here we show that Six3 is also crucial for lens formation. Conditional deletion of mouse Six3 in the presumptive lens ectoderm (PLE) disrupted lens formation. In the most severe cases, lens induction and specification were defective, and the lens placode and lens were absent. In Six3-mutant embryos, Pax6 was downregulated, and Sox2 was absent in the lens preplacodal ectoderm. Using ChIP, electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and luciferase reporter assays, we determined that Six3 activates Pax6 and Sox2 expression. Misexpression of mouse Six3 into chick embryos promoted the ectopic expansion of the ectodermal Pax6 expression domain. Our results position Six3 at the top of the regulatory pathway leading to lens formation. We conclude that Six3 directly activates Pax6 and probably also Sox2 in the PLE and regulates cell autonomously the earliest stages of mammalian lens induction.
Animals↗
Comparisons between transcriptional regulation and RNA expression in human embryonic stem cell lines.
Recent studies have focused on transcriptional regulation and gene expression profiling of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). However, little information is available regarding the relationship between RNA expression and transcriptional regulation, which is critical in the complete understanding of pluripotency and differentiation of hESCs. In the current study, we determined RNA expression of three different hESC lines compared to Human universal reference RNA expression (HuU-RNA) using a full genome expression microarray, and compared our results to target genes previously identified using ChIP-on-chip analysis. The objective was to identify genes common between the two methods, and generate a more reliable list of embryonic signature genes. Even though hESCs were obtained from different sources and maintained under different conditions, a considerable number of genes could be identified as common between RNA expression and transcriptional regulation analyses. As an example, results from ChIP-on-chip studies show that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG co-occupy SOX2, OCT4, TDGF1, GJA1, SET, and DPPA4 genes. The results are consistent with RNA expression analyses that demonstrate these genes as differently expressed in our hESC lines, further substantiating their role across cell types and confirming their importance as embryonic signatures. In addition, we report the differential expression of growth arrest-specific (GAS) family of genes in hESC. GAS2L1 and GAS3 members of this family appear to be transcriptionally regulated by OCT4, SOX2, or NANOG, whereas GAS5 and GAS6 are not; all of the genes are differentially expressed, as determined by microarray and validated via quantitative (Q)- PCR. Collectively, these data provide insight into the relationship between gene expression and transcriptional regulation, resulting in a reliable list of genes associated with hESCs.
DNA-Binding Proteins↗
Chromosome assignment of eight SOX family genes in chicken.
Chromosome locations of the eight SOX family genes, SOX1, SOX2, SOX3, SOX5, SOX9, SOX10, SOX14 and SOX21, were determined in the chicken by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The SOX1 and SOX21 genes were localized to chicken chromosome 1q3.1-->q3.2, SOX5 to chromosome 1p1.6-->p1.4, SOX10 to chromosome 1p1.6, and SOX3 to chromosome 4p1.2-->p1.1. The SOX2 and SOX14 genes were shown to be linked to chromosome 9 using two-colored FISH and chromosome painting, and the SOX9 gene was assigned to a pair of microchromosomes. These results suggest that these SOX genes form at least three clusters on chicken chromosomes. The seven SOX genes, SOX1, SOX2, SOX3, SOX5, SOX10, SOX14 and SOX21 were localized to chromosome segments with homologies to human chromosomes, indicating that the chromosome locations of SOX family genes are highly conserved between chicken and human.
Animals↗
Transcriptional repression and DNA hypermethylation of a small set of ES cell marker genes in male germline stem cells.
BACKGROUND: We previously identified a set of genes called ECATs (ES cell-associated transcripts) that are expressed at high levels in mouse ES cells. Here, we examine the expression and DNA methylation of ECATs in somatic cells and germ cells. RESULTS: In all ECATs examined, the promoter region had low methylation levels in ES cells, but higher levels in somatic cells. In contrast, in spite of their lack of pluripotency, male germline stem (GS) cells expressed most ECATs and exhibited hypomethylation of ECAT promoter regions. We observed a similar hypomethylation of ECAT loci in adult testis and isolated sperm. Some ECATs were even less methylated in male germ cells than in ES cells. However, a few ECATs were not expressed in GS cells, and most of them targets of Oct3/4 and Sox2. The Octamer/Sox regulatory elements were hypermethylated in these genes. In addition, we found that GS cells express little Sox2 protein and low Oct3/4 protein despite abundant expression of their transcripts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DNA hypermethylation and transcriptional repression of a small set of ECATs, together with post-transcriptional repression of Oct3/4 and Sox2, contribute to the loss of pluripotency in male germ cells.
Animals↗
Functional analysis of the chicken delta1-crystallin enhancer activity in Drosophila reveals remarkable evolutionary conservation between chicken and fly.
Functional conservation of enhancers among evolutionarily diverged organisms is a powerful way to identify basic regulatory circuits and key developmental regulators. This is especially applicable to Crystallin genes. Despite unexpected heterogeneity and diversity in their DNA sequences, many studies have revealed that most of the Crystallin genes are regulated by a relatively small set of developmentally important transcription factors. The chicken delta1-crystallin is one of the best-characterized Crystallin genes. Its lens-specific regulation is governed by a 30 bp long DC5 fragment present in the third intron of the gene. DC5 contains PAX6 and SOX2 binding sites, and its activity depends on the cooperative binding of these two transcription factors. To test the idea that Pax6 and Sox2, together with the DC5 enhancer, could form a basic regulatory circuit functional in distantly related animals, we introduced the DC5 fragment into Drosophila and studied its activation pattern and regulation. The results show that the DC5 enhancer is not only active in the compound eye but, remarkably, is specifically active in those cells responsible for Crystallin secretion in Drosophila, i.e. the cone cells. However, regulation of the DC5 enhancer is carried out not by Pax6, but by Pax2 (D-Pax2; shaven--FlyBase) in combination with the Sox2 homologue SoxN. Both proteins (D-PAX2 and SOXN) bind cooperatively to the DC5 fragment and activate the enhancer synergistically. As PAX6 and PAX2 proteins derive from the same ancestor, we propose that during evolution Pax6 function in vertebrate lens development was retained by Pax2 in Drosophila.
Animals↗
Involvement of Sox1, 2 and 3 in the early and subsequent molecular events of lens induction.
Activation of the first lens-specific gene of the chicken, delta 1-crystallin, is dependent on a group of lens nuclear factors, deltaEF2, interacting with the delta1-crystallin minimal enhancer, DC5. One of the deltaEF2 factors was previously identified as SOX2. We show that two related SOX proteins, SOX1 and SOX3, account for the remaining members of deltaEF2. Activation of the DC5 enhancer is dependent on their C-terminal domains. Expression of Sox1-3 in the eye region during lens induction was studied in comparison with Pax6 and delta1-crystallin. Pax6, known to be required for the inductive response of the ectoderm, is broadly expressed in the lateral head ectoderm from before lens induction. After tight association of the optic vesicle (around stage 10-11, 40 hours after egg incubation), expression of Sox2 and Sox3 is activated in the vesicle-facing ectoderm at stage 12 (44 hours). These cells, expressing together Pax6 and Sox2/3, subsequently give rise to the lens, beginning with formation of the lens placode and expression of delta-crystallin at stage 13 (48 hours). Sox1 then starts to be expessed in the lens-forming cells at stage 14. When the prospective retina area of the neural plate was unilaterally ablated at stage 7, expression of Sox2/3 was lost in the side of lateral head ectoderm lacking the optic cup, implying that an inductive signal from the optic cup activates Sox2/3 expression. In the mouse embryonic lens, this subfamily of Sox genes is expressed in an analogous fashion, although Sox3 transcripts have not been detected and Sox2 expression is down-regulated when Sox1 is activated. In ectodermal tissues of the chicken embryo, delta -crystallin expression occurs in a few ectopic sites. These are always characterized by overlapping expression of Sox2/3 and Pax6. Thus, an essential molecular event in lens induction is the 'turning on' of the transcriptional regulators SOX2/3 in the Pax6-expressing ectoderm and these SOX proteins activate crystallin gene expression. Continued activity, especially of SOX1, is then essential for further development of the lens.
Amino Acid Sequence↗