SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Simvastatin but not pravastatin is very susceptible to interaction with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole.

BACKGROUND: Itraconazole increases the risk of skeletal muscle toxicity of some 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A' (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors by increasing their serum concentrations. We studied possible interactions of itraconazole with simvastatin and pravastatin. METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, two-phase crossover studies were performed with use of an identical design, one with simvastatin (study I) and one with pravastatin (study II). In both studies, 10 healthy volunteers received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once a day for 4 days. On day 4, each subject ingested a single 40 mg dose of simvastatin (study I) or pravastatin (study II). Serum concentrations of simvastatin, simvastatin acid, pravastatin, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole were determined. RESULTS: In study I, itraconazole increased the peak serum concentrations (Cmax) and the areas under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC(0-infinity)] of simvastatin and simvastatin acid at least tenfold (p < 0.001). The Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) of total simvastatin acid (naive simvastatin acid plus that derived by hydrolysis of the lactone) were increased 17-fold and 19-fold (p < 0.001), respectively, and the half-life (t1/2) was increased by 25% (p < 0.05). The AUC(0-infinity) of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors was increased fivefold (p < 0.001) and the Cmax and t1/2 were increased threefold (p < 0.001). In study II, itraconazole slightly increased the AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax of pravastatin, but the changes were statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.052 and 0.172, respectively). The t1/2 was not altered. The AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were increased less than twofold (p < 0.05 and p = 0.063, respectively) by itraconazole. There were no differences in the serum concentrations of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole between studies I and II. CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole greatly increased serum concentrations of simvastatin, simvastatin acid, and HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, probably by inhibiting CYP3A-mediated metabolism, but it had only a minor effect on pravastatin. Concomitant use of potent inhibitors of CYP3A with simvastatin should be avoided or its dosage should be greatly reduced.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Cost-minimization analysis of simvastatin versus atorvastatin for maintenance therapy in patients with coronary or peripheral vascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous health economic studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD) based on clinical results of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. A prior analysis evaluated the "cost of getting to goal," but ignored all costs after titration. However, when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of long-term therapies, it is important to consider the maintenance costs as well. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the maintenance costs of treatment with simvastatin versus that of treatment with another more recently available statin, atorvastatin, in a European context. METHODS: We assessed the long-term maintenance cost of simvastatin versus atorvastatin in terms of the cost of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to the recommended goals based on a previously published clinical trial in patients with CHD. The analysis focused on the patients in the original clinical trial who were randomized to treatment with simvastatin or atorvastatin. Patients began therapy with 10 mg of simvastatin or atorvastatin; the dose of study drug was titrated every 12 weeks up to 40 mg simvastatin or 80 mg atorvastatin, with the addition of up to 8 g/d of cholestyramine until a modified European Atherosclerosis Society LDL-C goal (<2.84 mmol/L) was reached. As there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in resource utilization for adverse events, only drug costs were included. The calculated average annual maintenance cost was based on the distribution of the final daily dosing regimens and the public drug prices for each regimen. Individual country analyses were conducted using each local currency. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in the percentage of patients reaching their LDL-C goal over the study period (80% for simvastatin-treated pa- tients vs 89% for atorvastatin-treated patients, P = 0.135). However, the cost of maintaining a similar percentage of patients at their appropriate LDL-C levels was significantly lower in the simvastatin group compared with the atorvastatin group in 13 of the 17 countries assessed. In the remaining 4 countries, there was a cost advantage for simvastatin, but it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe there was a significant reduction in the cost of maintaining patients at their appropriate LDL-C levels with simvastatin versus atorvastatin. The results of this analysis, along with the proven clinical benefits of simvastatin, support the use of this drug as the treatment of choice in the secondary prevention of CHD.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Effects of imatinib mesylate (STI571, Glivec) on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, a cytochrome p450 3A4 substrate, in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.

The inhibition by imatinib of the cytochrome p450 3A4 isoenzyme may reduce the CYP3A4-mediated metabolic clearance of clinically important coadministered drugs. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the coadministration of imatinib on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, a probe CYP3A4 substrate. In total, 20 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia received an oral dose of 40 mg of simvastatin on study day 1. On study days 2-7, each patient received 400 mg of imatinib once daily orally and on study day 8, 400 mg imatinib together with 40 mg of simvastatin was given. Blood levels of simvastatin were measured predose and for 24 h postdose on study days 1 and 8. Two additional blood samples were taken for imatinib pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment on day 8 before, and 24 h after, imatinib administration. Imatinib increased the mean maximum concentration (C(max)) value of simvastatin two-fold and the area under concentration-time curve (AUC ((0-inf))) value 3.5-fold (P<0.001) compared with simvastatin alone. There was a statistically significant decrease in total-body clearance of drug from the plasma (CL/F) with a mean reduction of 70% for simvastatin (P<0.001): the mean half-life of simvastatin was prolonged from 1.4-2.7 h when given together with imatinib. No changes in imatinib PK parameters were found when given concomitantly with simvastatin. In conclusion, the coadministration of imatinib at steady state with 40 mg simvastatin increases the exposure (C(max) and AUCs) of simvastatin significantly (P<0.001) by two-three-fold. Caution is therefore required when administering imatinib with CYP3A4 substrates with a narrow therapeutic window. The coadministration of simvastatin with imatinib (400 mg) was well tolerated and no major safety findings were reported in this study.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2000

The interaction of diltiazem with simvastatin.

BACKGROUND: Simvastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase that is used as a cholesterol-lowering agent and is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes. Diltiazem is a substrate and an inhibitor of CYP3A enzymes and is commonly coadministered with cholesterol-lowering agents such as simvastatin. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. METHOD: A fixed-order study was conducted in 10 healthy volunteers with a 2-week washout period between the phases. In one arm of the study, a single 20-mg dose of simvastatin was administered orally; the second arm entailed administration of a single 20-mg dose of simvastatin orally after 2 weeks of treatment with 120 mg diltiazem twice a day. RESULTS: Diltiazem significantly increased the mean peak serum concentration of simvastatin by 3.6-fold (P < .05) and simvastatin acid by 3.7-fold (P < .05). Diltiazem also significantly increased the area under the serum concentration-time curve of simvastatin 5-fold (P < .05) and the elimination half-life 2.3-fold (P < .05). There was no change in the time to peak concentration for simvastatin and simvastatin acid. CONCLUSION: Diltiazem coadministration resulted in a significant interaction with simvastatin, probably by inhibiting CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Concomitant use of diltiazem or other potent inhibitors of CYP3A with simvastatin should be avoided, or close clinical monitoring should be used.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.

AIMS: Simvastatin, a substrate for CYP3A4, is extensively metabolized during the first pass. Our aim was to investigate the effect of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study with two phases, 10 healthy volunteers ingested grapefruit juice 200 ml or water (control) for 3 days. On day 3, a single 40-mg dose of simvastatin was administered with grapefruit juice 200 ml or water. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were determined up to 24 h. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0-24)] of simvastatin 3.6-fold (range 1.8-6.0-fold; P < 0.01) and that of simvastatin acid 3.3-fold (range 2.1-5.6-fold; P < 0.01), respectively. The peak concentrations (C(max)) of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were increased 3.9-fold (range 2.3-9.3-fold; P < 0.01) and 4.3-fold (range 2.7-7.9-fold; P < 0.01) by grapefruit juice. CONCLUSIONS: Even one glass of grapefruit juice, taken daily, considerably increases the plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid. Grapefruit juice may increase both the cholesterol-lowering effect and the risk of adverse effects of simvastatin.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of simvastatin given alone and in combination with valsartan or enalapril on blood pressure and the structure of mesenteric resistance arteries and the basilar artery in the genetically hypertensive rat model.

1. The aims of the present study were to investigate, in the New Zealand genetically hypertensive (GH) rat model, the effects of treatment with simvastatin, alone or in combination with valsartan or enalapril, on blood pressure (BP) and structural remodelling of mesenteric resistance arteries (MRA) and of the basilar artery, an artery that plays a major role in the regulation of cerebral resistance. 2. Genetically hypertensive rats were treated with simvastatin at two dose levels (5 and 10 mg/kg per day) and simvastatin in combination with valsartan or enalapril (also 5 and 10 mg/kg per day) from the age of 7 to 12 weeks. Systolic BP and bodyweight were measured weekly. 3. At the end of the experiment, following fixation by perfusion, MRA and the basilar artery were excised and embedded in Technovit (a glycol methacrylate medium; Heraeus Kulzer, Werheim, Germany). Serial sections were cut and stereological techniques used to determine tunica media width and cross-sectional area (CSA), lumen diameter and the ratio of media width/lumen diameter. 4. Simvastatin monotherapy did not lower BP at either dose. In the high- and low-dose groups, the combination of simvastatin + enalapril lowered BP more than with enalapril alone; this was also true for the simvastatin + valsartan combination in the lower-dose group. 5. The MRA were hypotrophically remodelled by the 10 mg/kg per day dose of simvastatin; the 5 mg/kg per day dose caused hypotrophic remodelling with decreased media/lumen ratio. Valsartan and enalapril caused hypotrophic remodelling together with outward remodelling of the lumen in the 10 mg/kg per day valsartan group and, in all groups, a reduction in the media/lumen ratio, with the greatest effect observed in the high-dose groups. 6. The combination treatments of simvastatin + valsartan and simvastatin + enalapril did not have any consistent extra effect on MRA remodelling. 7. In the basilar artery, high-dose simvastatin had a hypotrophic effect on the media and both doses reduced the media/lumen ratio independently of any change in BP. 8. Simvastatin given in combination with valsartan produced a slight further reduction in medial CSA, media width and ratio. In combination with enalapril, there was little consistent additional effect. 9. Simvastatin monotherapy hypotrophically remodelled the media of the basilar artery in the GH rat model, even in the absence of changes in BP. A similar structural effect may explain, in part, the reduction in stroke seen in patients treated with statins.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed2004

Simvastatin does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with fenofibrate in humans.

Simvastatin and fenofibrate are both commonly used lipid-regulating agents with distinct mechanisms of action, and their coadministration may be an attractive treatment for some patients with dyslipidemia. A 2-period, randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 subjects to determine if fenofibrate and simvastatin are subject to a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state. In treatment A, subjects received an 80-mg simvastatin tablet in the morning for 7 days. In treatment B, subjects received a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule in the morning for 7 days, followed by a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule dosed together with an 80-mg simvastatin tablet on days 8 to 14. Because food increases the bioavailability of fenofibrate, each dose was administered with food to maximize the exposure of fenofibric acid. The steady-state pharmacokinetics (AUC(0-24h), C(max), and t(max)) of active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, simvastatin acid, and simvastatin were determined following simvastatin administration with and without fenofibrate. Also, fenofibric acid steady-state pharmacokinetics were evaluated with and without simvastatin. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for AUC(0-24h) (80 mg simvastatin [SV] + 160 mg fenofibrate)/(80 mg simvastatin alone) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.88 (0.80, 0.95) and 0.92 (0.82, 1.03) for active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The GMRs and 90% CIs for fenofibric acid (80 mg SV + 160 mg fenofibrate/160 mg fenofibrate alone) AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 0.95 (0.88, 1.04) and 0.89 (0.77, 1.02), respectively. Because both the active inhibitor and fenofibric acid AUC GMR 90% confidence intervals fell within the prespecified bounds of (0.70, 1.43), no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between fenofibrate and simvastatin was concluded in humans. The coadministration of simvastatin and fenofibrate in this study was well tolerated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Clinical pharmacokinetics and practical applications of simvastatin.

Simvastatin is a methyl analogue of lovastatin and acts as an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor effective in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Like lovastatin, it is an inactive hydrophobic lactone prodrug which is metabolised in vivo to several more polar, pharmacologically active compounds, most notably the corresponding hydroxy acid form, simvastatin acid. HPLC techniques have been developed to assay simvastatin and its metabolites. In addition, a pharmacodynamic assay has been developed that measures HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity. This latter assay may be more applicable to clinical situations since simvastatin is not active, while its metabolites are. Simvastatin is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract but is highly extracted by the liver and only 7% of the dose reaches the general circulation intact. The peak inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase activity occurs within 2 to 4 hours. Increasing the dose of simvastatin from 5 to 120 mg increases the pharmacological activity in a linear fashion. The several metabolites tend to remain within the liver and the intestines (via biliary excretion). Some gastrointestinal reabsorption of metabolites may occur. Simvastatin is eliminated mainly in the faeces due to biliary excretion but only a small percentage of the dose is found in the stool in the form of the parent compound or simvastatin acid. Since simvastatin is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system, a potential for drug interactions exists. Elevated HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity has been observed when simvastatin was administered concurrently with cyclosporin, possibly increasing the risk of myopathy and subsequent rhabdomyolysis which are associated with simvastatin use. Simvastatin has also been shown to potentiate the effects of warfarin [corrected].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Investigation of the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and simvastatin.

BACKGROUND: In vitro, bosentan has been shown to be a mild inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. PURPOSE: To investigate in vivo the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan and simvastatin, a CYP3A4 substrate. METHODS: Nine healthy male subjects were treated in a three-period randomised crossover study with: (A) bosentan 125 mg twice daily for 5.5 days; (B) simvastatin 40 mg once daily for 6 days; and (C) bosentan 125 mg twice daily and simvastatin 40 mg once daily for 5.5 and 6 days, respectively. Plasma concentration-time profiles of bosentan and its metabolites (treatments A and C) and simvastatin and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin (treatments B and C) were determined on day 6. RESULTS: Steady-state conditions for bosentan and its metabolites were attained on day 4 of treatment. The pharmacokinetic parameters of bosentan and its metabolites were not influenced by concomitant treatment with simvastatin: areas under the plasma concentration-time curve over one administration interval of 12 hours (AUC(tau)) [geometric mean and 95% CI] were 4586 (3719-5656) and 4928 (3945-6156) micro g * h/L. In contrast, bosentan significantly reduced exposure to simvastatin and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin by 34 and 46%, respectively. AUC(tau) values for simvastatin were 30.5 (23.1-40.2) and 20.0 (15.9-25.1) micro g * h/L and for beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin 43.0 (32.1-57.8) and 23.4 (16.7-32.6) micro g * h/L in treatments B and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant treatment with bosentan reduces the exposure to simvastatin and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin by approximately 40%, indicating that in vivo bosentan is also a mild inducer of CYP3A4.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

A comparison of simvastatin and atorvastatin up to maximal recommended doses in a large multicenter randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: At higher doses, simvastatin has been shown to produce significantly greater increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I than atorvastatin. To extend and confirm these findings, a 36-week, randomized, double-blind, dose-titration study was performed in 826 hypercholesterolemic patients to compare the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL cholesterol, apo A-I, and clinical and laboratory safety. PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS: Simvastatin, across a range of doses, will be more effective than atorvastatin at raising HDL cholesterol and apo A-I levels. METHODS: A total of 826 hypercholesterolemic patients were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, parallel, 36-week, dose-escalation study. Patients randomized to simvastatin received 40 mg/day for the first 6 weeks, 80 mg/day for the next 6 weeks, and remained on 80 mg/day for the final 24 weeks. Patients randomized to atorvastatin received 20 mg/day for the first 6 weeks, 40 mg/day for the next 6 weeks, and 80 mg/day for the remaining 24 weeks. RESULTS: During the first 12 weeks of the study, simvastatin increased HDL cholesterol and apo A-I more than the comparative doses of atorvastatin, while producing slightly lower reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. At the maximal dose comparison, simvastatin 80 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg, the HDL cholesterol and apo A-I differences favoring simvastatin were larger than at the lower doses. In addition, at the maximal dose comparison, the incidence of drug-related clinical adverse experiences was approximately two-fold higher with atorvastatin 80 mg than with simvastatin 80 mg (23 versus 12%, p < 0.001), due predominantly to a greater incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms with atorvastatin (10 versus 3%, p < 0.001). The incidence of clinically significant alanine aminotransferase elevations was also higher with atorvastatin 80 mg than with simvastatin 80 mg (3.8 versus 0.5%, p < 0.010), especially in women (6.0 versus 0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: At the doses compared in this study, simvastatin led to greater increases in HDL cholesterol and apo A-I levels than atorvastatin. At the maximum dose comparison, there were fewer drug-related gastrointestinal symptoms and clinically significant aminotransferase elevations with simvastatin.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Effects of combined bezafibrate-simvastatin appraised in healthy subjects.

The occurrence of clinical and biochemical side effects of bezafibrate (400 mg daily) or simvastatin (20 mg daily) alone or combined was appraised in 13 healthy male normolipidemic subjects according to a single blind design. Each period of 2 weeks of treatment with bezafibrate or simvastatin or bezafibrate plus simvastatin was followed by a period of placebo (1 week). No subjects experienced myalgia or muscle weakness. Plasma creatine kinase (CK) elevations, particularly skeletal muscle CK (CK-MM), were observed in 6 subjects: 11 times during different placebo periods, 5 times on bezafibrate, 4 times on simvastatin, and 4 times on combined bezafibrate-simvastatin, but never reached 1,600 IU/L. Only a trend to an increase of CK mean values on combined bezafibrate-simvastatin was shown. The hepatic transaminase and gamma-glutamyltransferase activities remained unmodified throughout the trial, unlike alkaline phosphatase activity, which fell on bezafibrate and on bezafibrate plus simvastatin. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was more reduced with simvastatin than with bezafibrate. The addition of bezafibrate to simvastatin did not decrease it further. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity expressed as fractional esterification rate was enhanced only on simvastatin and bezafibrate-simvastatin.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Simvastatin reduced ischemic brain injury and perfusion deficits in an embolic model of stroke.

Simvastatin is cholesterol lowering agent and also a modulator of cytokine in the nervous system. The functional significance and neuroprotectiove mechanism of simvastatins in ischemic brain injury is controversial. The purpose of study is to evaluate the effect of simvastatin on ischemic brain injury and to investigate the perfusion capability of brain microvessels in the ischemic injury. This study included two series of experiments. In the first series, we studied if simvastatin is neuroprotective in an embolic model of stroke. The treatments began 2 weeks before middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Infarct volume was measured at 48 h post stroke. Neurological deficits were assessed at 2 h, 24 h and 48 h post stroke. Results showed that infarct volume in rats which received saline and simvastatin was 32.5 +/- 9.3% (mean +/- SD) and 18.7 +/- 6.5%, respectively. The infarct volume in the simvastatin group was significantly smaller than in the controls (P < 0.002). Treatment with simvastatin also improved neurological deficits and reduced brain edema significantly (P < 0.05). In the second series, we studied if simvastatin can improve microvascular reperfusions after ischemia. Perfusion deficits were detected at 8 h post stroke using Evens blue dye. Neurological deficits were assessed at 2 h and 8 h post stroke. Results showed that perfusion deficit in saline and simvastatin-treated groups were 58.7 +/- 8.7% and 23.4 +/- 7.5%, respectively. The perfusion deficit in simvastatin-treated group was decreased 61% (P < 0.01). These studies thus suggest that simvastatin is a protective agent in ischemic brain injury and this protective effect may be partially due to its action in the improvement of microvascular reperfusion.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Influence of atorvastatin and simvastatin on apolipoprotein B metabolism in moderate combined hyperlipidemic subjects with low VLDL and LDL fractional clearance rates.

Subjects with moderate combined hyperlipidemia (n=11) were assessed in an investigation of the effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin (both 40 mg per day) on apolipoprotein B (apoB) metabolism. The objective of the study was to examine the mechanism by which statins lower plasma triglyceride levels. Patients were studied on three occasions, in the basal state, after 8 weeks on atorvastatin or simvastatin and then again on the alternate treatment. Atorvastatin produced significantly greater reductions than simvastatin in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (49.7 vs. 44.1% decrease on simvastatin) and plasma triglyceride (46.4 vs. 39.4% decrease on simvastatin). ApoB metabolism was followed using a tracer of deuterated leucine. Both drugs stimulated direct catabolism of large very low density lipoprotein (VLDL(1)) apoB (4.52+/-3.06 pools per day on atorvastatin; 5.48+/-4.76 pools per day on simvastatin versus 2.26+/-1.65 pools per day at baseline (both P<0.05)) and this was the basis of the 50% reduction in plasma VLDL(1) concentration; apoB production in this fraction was not significantly altered. On atorvastatin and simvastatin the fractional transfer rates (FTR) of VLDL(1) to VLDL(2) and of VLDL(2) to intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) were increased significantly, in the latter instance nearly twofold. IDL apoB direct catabolism rose from 0.54+/-0.30 pools per day at baseline to 1.17+/-0.87 pools per day on atorvastatin and to 0.95+/-0.43 pools per day on simvastatin (both P<0.05). Similarly the fractional transfer rate for IDL to LDL conversion was enhanced 58-84% by statin treatment (P<0.01) LDL apoB fractional catabolic rate (FCR) which was low at baseline in these subjects (0.22+/-0.04 pools per day) increased to 0.44+/-0.11 pools per day on atorvastatin and 0.38+/-0.11 pools per day on simvastatin (both P<0.01). ApoB-containing lipoproteins were more triglyceride-rich and contained less free cholesterol and cholesteryl ester on statin therapy. Further, patients on both treatments showed marked decreases in all LDL subfractions. In particular the concentration of small dense LDL (LDL-III) fell 64% on atorvastatin and 45% on simvastatin. We conclude that in patients with moderate combined hyperlipidemia who initially have a low FCR for VLDL and LDL apoB, the principal action of atorvastatin and simvastatin is to stimulate receptor-mediated catabolism across the spectrum of apoB-containing lipoproteins. This leads to a substantial, and approximately equivalent, percentage reduction in plasma triglyceride and LDL cholesterol.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces myocardial no-reflow by opening mitochondrial K(ATP) channel.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Simvastatin, a cholesterol-lowering agent, can protect against endothelial dysfunction. However, the effects of simvastatin treatment on the restoration of blood flow to ischemic myocardium are not known. This study sought to assess such effects of simvastatin on an experimental model of myocardial no-reflow and to explore possible mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Coronary ligation area and area of no-reflow were determined by myocardial contrast echocardiography in vivo and by histology in mini-pigs randomized into 7 study groups: controls, pretreated with simvastatin for 2 days, treated with 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, the selective mitochondrial K(ATP) channel blocker), treated with simvastatin+5-HD, treated with HMR 1883 (the selective sarcolemmal K(ATP) channel blocker), treated with simvastatin+HMR 1883 and a sham-operated group. The myocardial no-reflow model was induced with 3 h occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 2 h reperfusion. KEY RESULTS: Compared with the control group, simvastatin significantly increased coronary blood flow, decreased the area of no-reflow assessed echocardiographically and reduced the necrotic area, by histology. There was no significant difference in these outcomes between simvastatin and simvastatin+HMR 1883 groups. In contrast, 5-HD abolished the effect of simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Simvastatin can reduce the area and myocardial no-reflow after ischaemia and reperfusion. This beneficial effect is due to its activation of mitochondrial K(ATP) channels.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Simvastatin and intracellular pH regulation by the Na+/H+ antiport of SV40-virus-transformed human MRC5 fibroblasts.

1. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase by simvastatin leads to inhibition of both cell growth and Na+/H+ antiport activity. The effect of simvastatin on intracellular pH and Na+/H+ antiport activity was therefore studied on an adherent cell line, the SV40-virus-transformed MRC5 human fibroblast. 2. Simvastatin led to a dose-dependent decrease in intracellular pH, attributed to a reduction in Na+/H+ exchange, together with a rounding of cell shape. Mevalonate (1 mmol/l) prevented these effects of simvastatin, and when added after inhibition of the antiport by simvastatin, reversed these changes within 1-2h. 3. The phenomenon of mevalonate reversal of antiport inhibition by simvastatin was not sensitive to cycloheximide, indicating its post-translational nature. This was also consistent with the short period of incubation with mevalonate leading to reversal of antiport inhibition (1-2 h). These changes in intracellular pH regulation were not due to alterations in cell cholesterol content. 4. A variety of inhibitors of post-translational processes, such as N-linked glycosylation (tunicamycin), phosphorylation (staurosporine), isoprenylation (farnesol, limonene), and of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G-proteins or calmodulin (W7), had no effect on the reversal by mevalonate of simvastatin-induced changes in Na+/H+ antiport activity. 5. N-Ethylmaleimide (50 mumol/l for 5 min) prevented mevalonate reversing the effects of simvastatin, suggesting the importance of thiol groups in the phenomenon of reversal of the inhibition of Na+/H+ antiport activity by simvastatin. Furthermore, concurrent incubation of simvastatin-treated cells with dithiothreitol (1 mmol/l) and N-ethylmaleimide restored the ability of mevalonate to reverse the inhibitory effects of simvastatin on Na+H+ antiport activity.

Carrier Proteins↗

PubMed2003

Simvastatin suppresses tissue factor expression and increases fibrinolytic activity in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated human peritoneal mesothelial cells.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis frequently suffer from recurrent peritonitis episodes. During peritonitis, inflammatory mediators are released and a serofibrinous exudate is formed in the peritoneal cavity, which promotes fibrosis and abdominal adhesion development. Human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HMC) play a critical role in maintaining the intraperitoneal balance between fibrinolysis and coagulation by expressing the fibrinolytic enzyme tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and its specific inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as well as the procoagulant protein, tissue factor. METHODS: Cultured HMC were used to examine the effect of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, simvastatin, on the expression of t-PA, PAI-1 and tissue factor after activation of the cells with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Antigen concentrations in the cell supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Northern blot analysis was conducted for mRNA expression. Luciferase reporter gene assays and Western blot analysis in human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells and HMC were performed to analyze the effect of simvastatin on the transcription factors nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) and activator protein-1 (AP-1), which regulate tissue factor gene expression. RESULTS: Incubation of HMC with TNF-alpha resulted in significantly decreased t-PA and increased PAI-1 synthesis. In the presence of simvastatin t-PA synthesis in control and TNF-alpha-treated cells dose-dependently increased, reaching 5.8-fold and 7.7-fold higher t-PA levels, respectively, at 5 micromol/L simvastatin after 48 hours. Simvastatin dose-dependently suppressed PAI-1 production in both control and TNF-alpha-treated cells. At 5 micromol/L, simvastatin lowered PAI-1 synthesis 3.4-fold and 4.0-fold, respectively, thereby also completely suppressing the TNF-alpha effect itself. Similarly, simvastatin down-regulated the expression of tissue factor and also completely opposed the TNF-alpha-induced tissue factor expression. The effects of simvastatin on t-PA, PAI-1 and tissue factor expression were prevented by mevalonate and geranylgeraniol (GG), suggesting the involvement of geranylgeranyl-modified intermediates in simvastatin's mode of action. Also, simvastatin reduced NF-kappa B- and AP-1-dependent reporter gene activity in TNF-alpha-treated HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells and reduced the nuclear levels of p50-NF-kappa B, p65-NF-kappa B, and the AP-1 components c-fos and c-jun in HMC. CONCLUSION: The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin is an effective stimulator of the mesothelial fibrinolytic capacity and suppresses the procoagulant activity both under normal and inflammatory conditions. Our findings provide a molecular explanation for the anti-inflammatory properties of statins in HMC and a rationale for the use of these drugs to protect peritoneal dialysis patients from peritoneal fibrosis and adhesion development during bacterial peritonitis.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1997

The effect of simvastatin on progression of coronary artery disease. The Multicenter coronary Intervention Study (CIS).

BACKGROUND: In several angiographic trials, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have shown a beneficial effect on the progression of coronary artery disease. Using 20 mg simvastatin, day-1, a treatment period of up to 4 years was necessary to show a significant reduction in coronary artery disease progression. The question remains however whether higher dosages of simvastatin would be more advantageous in respect to the magnitude of the effect and the required time interval to demonstrate treatment efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Coronary Intervention Study (CIS), a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, the effects of lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin on progression of coronary artery disease in 254 men with documented coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolaemia were investigated. Following a period of lipid-lowering diet, treatment with 40 mg simvastatin or placebo was maintained for an average of 2.3 years. Two primary angiographic endpoints were chosen: the global change score (visual evaluation according to the method of Blankenhorn) and the per patient mean change of minimum lumen diameter (evaluated by the CAAS I system). The mean simvastatin dose was 34.5 mg day-1. In the placebo group, the serum lipids remained unchanged; in comparison to the placebo group the simvastatin group showed a 35% LDL-cholesterol decrease. Coronary angiography was repeated in 205 patients (81%) and 203 film pairs (80%,) were evaluable by quantitative coronary angiography. In the simvastatin and placebo groups, the mean global change scores were +0.20 and +0.58 respectively, demonstrating a significantly slower progression of coronary artery disease in the treatment group (P = 0.02). The change in minimum lumen diameter assessed by computer-assisted quantitative evaluation with the CAAS I system was -0.02 mm in the simvastatin group and -0.10 mm in the placebo group (P = 0.002). In the simvastatin group, there was a significant correlation between the LDL cholesterol levels achieved therapeutically and the per patient mean loss of minimum lumen diameter (r = 0.29; P = 0.003). During the study period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of serious cardiac events (15 of 129 patients in the simvastatin group and 19 of 125 patients in the placebo group, ns). CONCLUSION: Treatment with 40 mg simvastatin day-1 reduces serum cholesterol and slows the progression of coronary artery disease significantly within a short period of treatment time. In the treatment group, retardation of progression is inversely correlated to the LDL-cholesterol levels achieved.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Randomized placebo-controlled study of the effects of simvastatin on haemostatic variables, lipoproteins and free fatty acids. The Oxford Cholesterol Study Group.

The Oxford Cholesterol Study is a randomized placebo-controlled trial designed primarily to assess the effects of simvastatin on blood cholesterol levels and side-effects in preparation for a large, long-term trial of the effects of cholesterol-lowering drug therapy on mortality. At present there is only limited evidence from randomized comparisons of the effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, such as simvastatin, on thrombogenic, as distinct from atherogenic, pathways in coronary heart disease. The present sub-study was carried out to assess the effects of simvastatin on a range of haemostatic variables, as well as on free fatty acids and on lipoprotein fractions not studied in detail previously. At an average of about 2 years after starting study treatment, non-fasting blood samples were obtained from a sequential sample of 162 participants who had been randomly allocated to receive 40 mg (54 patients) or 20 mg (57 patients) daily simvastatin or matching placebo treatment (51 patients). Only patients who reported taking their study treatment and who were not known to be diabetic or to be taking some other lipid lowering treatment were to be included. The principal comparisons were to be of those allocated simvastatin (i.e. 20 and 40 mg doses combined) vs those allocated placebo. Among patients allocated simvastatin, marginally significant lower factor VII antigen levels (12.10% +/- 6.08 of standard; 2P < 0.05) and non-significantly lower factor VII coagulant activity (8.24% +/- 4.99 of standard) and fibrinogen concentrations (0.10 +/- 0.08 g. l-1) were observed. In contrast, plasminogen activator inhibitor activity was significantly higher (2.62 +/- 1.03 IU; 2P < 0.01) among patients allocated simvastatin. No significant differences were seen in the other haemostatic factors studied (e.g. prothrombin fragment 1.2, factor XII and C1 inhibitor). Total free fatty acid concentration was marginally significantly reduced (2P = 0.02) with simvastatin, but none of the reductions in individual free fatty acids was significant. Lipoprotein fractions were only measured among patients allocated 40 mg daily simvastatin or placebo. Compared with placebo, simvastatin produced significant decreases not only in LDL cholesterol (1.74 +/- 0.15 mmol.1(-1): 2P < 0.0001) but also in VLDL cholesterol (0.28 +/- 0.08 mmol.1(-1); 2P < 0.001) and IDL cholesterol (0.17 +/- 0.03 mmol.1(-1); 2P < 0.0001). There were also lower triglyceride levels associated with LDL (0.07 +/- 0.01 mmol.1(-1); 2P < 0.0001), IDL (0.03 +/- 0.01 mmol.1(-1); 2P < 0.01) and VLDL (0.27 +/- 0.14; 2P = 0.05). The effects of simvastatin on haemostatic variables appear to be far less marked than its lipid effects. Given the associations of haemostatic factors with coronary heart disease incidence, larger randomized comparisons of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (and of the newer fibrates which may produce greater effects) are needed to provide more reliable estimates of the extent to which they influence these variables.

Adult↗