Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Severity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Association of body position with severity of apneic events in patients with severe nonpositional obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the severity of sleep apneic events occurring in the supine posture vs the severity of sleep apneic events occurring in the lateral posture in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of apneic event variables in a group of 30 OSA patients who underwent a complete polysomnographic evaluation in our sleep disorders unit. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with severe OSA (respiratory disturbance index [RDI] = 70.1+/-18.2) who were nonpositional patients (NPP), ie, in whom the ratio of the supine RDI to the lateral RDI is < 2 (supine RDI = 85.7+/-11.7, lateral RDI = 64.8+/-17.3), and who had > or =30 apneic events in the lateral position and 30 apneic events in the supine position during sleep stage 2 were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: For the 30 apneic events in each body position, the following variables were evaluated: apnea duration (ApDur), minimum desaturation (MinDes), Delta desaturation (Delta-Des), duration of arousal (DurArous), maximum snoring loudness (MaxSL), and Delta heart rate (Delta-HR). In addition, three other variables assessed as a ratio of ApDur (Rate-D = Delta-Des/ApDur, R-HR =Delta-HR/ApDur, and R-Arous = DurArous/ApDur) were also calculated. RESULTS: For all variables evaluated, apneic events occurring in the supine posture were significantly more severe than those apneic events occurring in the lateral posture during sleep stage 2. ApDur of both body postures correlated significantly with DurArous, Delta-HR, and MaxSL, but not with Delta-Des and MinDes. ApDur correlated linearly with DurArous for both postures. The slopes of the two regression lines were similar (p = 0.578) but the regression line intercept for the supine apneas was significantly higher than that of lateral apneas (p<0.0001). In addition, the average number of supine apneic events that did not end with an arousal was smaller than the average number of lateral apneic events not ending with an arousal (4.4+/-6.0 vs. 10.5+/-6.7, respectively; p< 0.0001). Also, only 4 of 900 (0.44%) apneic events analyzed in the lateral posture ended with an awakening (> 15 s), whereas in the supine posture, there were 37 (4.1%) such events (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that even in patients with severe OSA who have a high number of apneic events in the supine and lateral posture, the apneic events occurring in the supine position are more severe than those occurring while sleeping in the lateral position. Thus, it is not only the number of apneic events that worsen in the supine sleep position but, probably no less important, the nature of the apneic events themselves.

Apnea↗

Severity of cervical spine ligamentous injury correlates with mechanism of injury, not with severity of blunt head trauma.

Clearance of the cervical spine (CS) in obtunded trauma patients in an intensive care unit is problematic. Patients with no osseous injuries have potential unstable extradural supportive soft tissue injury. Evaluation of the supporting structures involves dynamic fluoroscopy or MRI both of which have inherent risks and convenience issues. Defining which of these patients are at highest risk for severe supportive structure injury may improve resource utilization for CS clearance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical factors that may predict the probability of CS supportive soft tissue injury in patients with traumatic brain injury. Patients who sustained traumatic brain injury with intracranial pathology, absence of CS osseous injury, and a limited cervical spine MRI within 72 hours of injury were included. Potential clinical predictors included the severity of the traumatic brain injury defined by the Abbreviated Injury Severity Score for the cerebrum and initial Glasgow Coma Scale, the Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism of injury, and high versus low-velocity mechanism. Severity of soft tissue/ligament injury was graded by MRI findings. One hundred twenty-five patients met the study criteria; 81 had negative MRI findings and in 44 the MRI study was positive for potentially unstable injuries. High-velocity mechanisms of injury and ISS--not the severity of the traumatic brain injury or initial Glasgow Coma Scale score--were statistically significant predictors of severe CS supportive soft tissue injuries. Obtunded blunt trauma patients who have been involved in high-velocity-mechanism incidents and have high ISS are at greatest risk for extradural supportive soft tissue CS injuries. These patients should either remain in CS immobilization until clinical evaluation can be completed or undergo further evaluation of their supportive soft tissue structures by MRI or fluoroscopic flexion/extension.

Adult↗

Psoriasis: severity assessment in clinical practice. Conclusions from workshop discussions and a prospective multicentre survey of psoriasis severity.

Psoriasis treatment is highly individualized. Although a standardized assessment of psoriasis severity for clinical practice may be theoretically advantageous for the purposes of determining treatment, the relevance of currently available research tools in clinical practice is uncertain. Our objectives were to ascertain in workshop discussions and through a prospective survey the relevance of standard severity measures in clinical practice with regard to choice of treatment. Although there was agreement on the possible structure of an algorithm for the treatment-related definition of psoriasis severity, consensus on the cut-off levels for the PASI and %BSA that would indicate a switch in treatment mode could not be reached. The lack of agreement prompted a prospective survey of 112 patients with psoriasis from 10 countries. This survey used a formal questionnaire asking for the PASI and %BSA scores, the patient's self assessment score (VAS ranging from 0 to 10), location of the psoriatic lesions and disease phase. Severity scores from 20 patients pre-selected for inclusion in a trial of a biological agent were included for comparison. Severity scores were analysed in relation to the choice of treatment (topical or systemic, which included phototherapy and combination) suggested by the treating physician.PASI scores differed significantly between the treatment groups (topical vs systemic, p=0.009); however, there was large overlap in the range of PASI scores between the groups. The same was true for VAS scores (topical vs systemic, p=0.035). %BSA scores were not significantly different between treatment groups. There was a large overlap for both the topical and systemic treatment groups with the biologicals group for the range of both the PASI and %BSA scores. A standardized protocol for the evaluation of psoriasis severity based on established severity scores (PASI, %BSA) appears to be unrealistic in day-to-day clinical practice. In clinical practice, a host of factors must be evaluated alongside possible metric measures. This requires experience and the specialized medical education of those involved in the treatment of patients with psoriasis.

Humans↗

[Case of severe eosinophilic pneumonia, induced by several antibiotics, requiring mechanical ventilation].

We report a case of severe eosinophilic pneumonia induced by several antibiotics, requiring mechanical ventilation. A 44-year-old man had been admitted previously to a different hospital because of a high fever and dry cough continuing for a week. Although bacterial pneumonia was diagnosed and he had been treated with several antibiotics, his respiratory state worsened gradually and he was refered to our hospital with severe hypoxia. He needed mechanical ventilation on the fifth hospital day. TBLB identified eosinophilic pneumonia. Although we discontinued all antibiotics and started steroid therapy, he became feverish and his leukocyte count, which was neutrophil dominant, elevated again. We suspected bacterial pneumonia and administered antibiotics that he had never received before. However we had to discontinue these antibiotics soon because of a further inflammatory response. His condition then improved gradually and he was weaned from mechanical ventilation. It is rare for drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia to become so severe that mechanical ventilation is necessary. We thought that an allergic reaction may have been induced by the series of several antibiotics, inducing severe pneumonia.

Adult↗

[The methodology for the objective assessment of trauma severity (I. The assessment of the severity of mechanical injuries)].

The article proposes the methodology for assessment of the trauma severity according to two parameters: the severity of injuries and the severity of the wounded's and victims' state. The severity of injuries is a morphological characteristic of the trauma and it is a stable parameter, while the severity of the state is a functional characteristic of the trauma and represents a dynamic parameter. The assessment of each parameter is based upon calculation of quantitative indices by original scales. The authors propose a scale "MFS-I(MT)" for the assessment of the mechanical injury severity. Its specific features are polycriterial and are of the universal character. The injuries are characterized by weighed indices of the severity according to 3 criteria: the probability of a lethal outcome permanent invalidism and continuous loss of the ability to work. The scale can be used for the assessment of isolated, multiple and combined traumas. It is intended for using in military field conditions and in extreme situations.

Humans↗

[Metered-dose inhaler with spacer vs nebulization for severe and potentially severe acute asthma treatment in the pediatric emergency department].

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment with beta 2 agonist delivered either by a spacer device or a nebulizer in children with severe or potentially severe acute asthma. METHODS: In this randomized trial, children 4 to 15 years, cared for in the emergency department for severe or potentially severe acute asthma, received 6 times either nebulizations of salbutamol (0.15mg/kg) or puffs of a beta 2 agonist (salbutamol 50 microg/kg or terbutaline 125 microg/kg). The primary outcome was the hospitalization rate. Secondary outcomes included percentage improvement in Bishop score, in PEF, SaO(2), respiratory and heart rates, side effects, length of stay and relapses 10 and 30 days later. RESULTS: Groups did not differ for baseline data. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (nebulizer N=40, spacer N=39) for baseline characteristics before emergency department consultation except for length of acute asthma in the spacer group. Clinical evolution after treatment, hospitalization rate, relapse were similar including the more severe subgroup. In the spacer group, tachycardia was less frequent (P<0.02). The overall length of stay in the emergency department was significantly shorter (148+/-20 vs 108+/-13 min, P<10(-9)). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of beta 2 agonist using a metered-dose inhaler with spacer is an effective alternative to nebulizers for the treatment of children with severe or potentially severe acute asthma in the emergency department. Time gained can be used for asthma education.

Acute Disease↗

Does severity of low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community?

BACKGROUND: The severity of allergic reactions to food appears to be affected by many interacting factors. It is uncertain whether challenge-based reactions reflect the severity of past reactions or can predict future risk. OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship of a subject's clinical history of past reactions to the severity of reaction elicited by a low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with peanut. METHOD: Cross-sectional questionnaire assessment of community-based allergic reactions and low-dose DBPCFC in self-selected peanut-allergic subjects. Reaction severity was assessed using a novel scoring system, taking account of the dose of allergen ingested. RESULTS: Forty subjects (15 males, 23 children, 23 asthmatics by history) were studied. Only the most recent community reaction predicted the severity of reaction in the DBPCFC, but even this association was weak (r=0.37, P=0.03). Peanut-specific IgE (PsIgE) and skin prick test (SPT) weal size were not associated with community score but PsIgE level correlated well with the challenge score (r=0.6, P=0.001). Asthma did not affect the eliciting dose or challenge score directly but the association of PsIgE and challenge score was stronger in those without asthma (r=0.72, P=0.001) than in those with asthma (r=0.48, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system developed appears to improve the sensitivity of assessment of reactions induced by DBPCFC. This is the first prospective study showing an association between PsIgE levels and clinical reactivity in DBPCFC, an effect that is more pronounced in non-asthmatics. This finding has important implications for the clinical care of subjects with food allergy. There is a poor correlation between the severity of reported reactions in the community and the severity of reaction elicited during low-dose DBPCFC with peanut.

Administration, Oral↗

Depth of lesion model in children and adolescents with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: use of SPGR MRI to predict severity and outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The utility of a depth of lesion classification using an SPGR MRI sequence in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was examined. Clinical and depth of lesion classification measures of TBI severity were used to predict neurological and functional outcome after TBI. METHODS: One hundred and six children, aged 4 to 19, with moderate to severe TBI admitted to a rehabilitation unit had an SPGR MRI sequence obtained 3 months afterTBI. Acquired images were analyzed for location, number, and size of lesions. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was the clinical indicator of severity. The deepest lesion present was used for depth of lesion classification. Speed of injury was inferred from the type of injury. The disability rating scale at the time of discharge from the rehabilitation unit (DRS1) and at 1 year follow up (DRS2) were functional outcome measures. RESULTS: The depth of lesion classification was significantly correlated with GCS severity, number of lesions, and both functional measures, DRS1 and DRS2. This result was more robust for time 1, probably due to the greater number of psychosocial factors impacting on functioning at time 2. Lesion volume was not correlated with the depth of lesion model. In multivariate models, depth of lesion was most predictive of DRS1, whereas GCS was most predictive of DRS2. CONCLUSIONS: A depth of lesion classification of TBI severity may have clinical utility in predicting functional outcome in children and adolescents with moderate to severe TBI.

Adolescent↗

Induced sputum in adolescents with severe stable asthma. Safety and the relationship of cell counts and eosinophil cationic protein to clinical severity.

This study examined the safety of sputum induction and the relation between sputum cell counts and clinical parameters in adolescents with severe persistent asthma. Within 5 days, induced sputum and reversibility in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), quality of life, provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) of adenosine monophosphate and histamine, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, overall asthma severity index, and blood eosinophils were collected in 20 atopic adolescents with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (12-18 yrs of age, FEV1 65-110% of predicted, on 500-2,000 microg inhaled steroids daily). FEV1 was reversible by 13.3-2.3% pred. After sputum induction, FEV1 was still increased by 9.0+/-2.6% pred as compared to the pre-salbutamol baseline. Sputum contained, median (range): 12.4 (0.4-59.5)% squamous cells, 47.3 (6.8-84.0)% macrophages, 39.0 (4.6-84.8)% neutrophils, 4.8 (1.0-12.4)% lymphocytes, 0.4 (0-10.8)% eosinophils and 3.6 (0-23.4)% bronchial epithelial cells. Sputum eosinophils showed a trend towards a significant association with the overall asthma severity index (r=0.46, p=0.06) and correlated inversely with baseline FEV1 (r=-0.51, p=0.03). In conclusion, sputum can be induced safely in adolescents with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma, if pretreated with beta2-agonists. Despite relatively low sputum eosinophil counts in these patients on inhaled steroids, the association of eosinophil numbers with baseline forced expiratory volume in one second and asthma severity index favours a role of induced sputum in monitoring adolescents with severe asthma.

Adolescent↗

Predictors of survival and severity of disability after severe brain injury in children.

Seventy-five children, 16 years of age or younger, consecutively admitted to a level I trauma center over a 2-year period with severe nonpenetrating traumatic brain injuries were studied to assess factors predictive of survival and level of disability. The mortality rate was 33%; 31% had good recovery, 12% had moderate disability, 19% had severe disability, and 5% remained in a vegetative state. Factors were analyzed separately for potential effects on survival and, with fatalities excluded, for potential effects on the level of disability in survivors. Clinical status in the field and emergency room, although highly associated with survival, was less predictive of the level of disability in survivors. Glasgow Coma Scale scores 72 hours after injury, especially the motor component, were significantly better predictors of quality of survival. The severity of the brain injury and the presence and severity of extracranial injuries were strongly related both to survival and quality of survival. Chest injuries, in particular, were associated with increased mortality and morbidity, as was level of oxygenation; these factors were highly correlated. Factors most significantly predictive of survival were severity of total injuries as assessed with the Injury Severity Score and pupillary responses in the emergency room; factors most predictive of disability were Glasgow Coma Scale motor responses 72 hours after injury and level of oxygenation in the emergency room. These findings of differential predictive factors for outcomes of survival versus quality of survival have implications relevant both to clinical care and to research involving severely brain-injured children.

Adolescent↗

Relationship between the location of the most severe myocardial perfusion defects, the most severe coronary artery stenosis, and the site of subsequent myocardial infarction.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the relationship between the location of the most severe myocardial perfusion defects, the most severe coronary artery stenosis, and the site of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Of 3,180 patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of AMI, we identified 44 patients who had undergone previous myocardial perfusion SPECT. Thirty-one of them also had previous coronary angiography. The relationship between the location of the myocardial perfusion defects, the coronary artery stenosis, and the site of subsequent AMI was studied in these patients. RESULTS: The concordance between the location of the most severe reversible defects detected by SPECT and the site of subsequent AMI was 71% (kappa = 0.499). The concordance between the most severe stenosis detected by coronary angiography and the site of subsequent AMI was 64% (kappa = 0.451). However, kappa values for SPECT and coronary angiography were good when the interval between these investigations and subsequent AMI was <3 mo (0.724 and 0.661, respectively), for moderate to severe perfusion defects (0.719), and for 90%-99% coronary stenosis (0.626). CONCLUSION: The culprit lesion is not always the one that is manifested by the most severe reversible perfusion defect or the most critical coronary artery stenosis. Myocardial SPECT and coronary angiography can predict the location of a future AMI in 71% and 64% of patients, respectively. The percentage is higher when the interval between investigations and subsequent AMI is <3 mo, for moderate to severe perfusion defects, and for 90%-99% coronary stenosis.

Aged↗

Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score > 15).

BACKGROUND: We studied the association of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center designation and mortality in adult patients with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15). ACS designation of trauma centers into different levels requires substantial financial and human resources commitments. There is very little work published on the association of ACS trauma center designation and outcomes in severe trauma. STUDY DESIGN: National Trauma Data Bank study including all adult trauma admissions (older than 14 years of age) with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. The relationship between ACS level of trauma designation and survival outcomes was evaluated after adjusting for age, mechanism of injury, ISS, hypotension on admission, severe liver trauma, aortic, vena cava, iliac vascular, and penetrating cardiac injuries. RESULTS: A total of 130,154 patients from 256 trauma centers met the inclusion criteria. Adjusted mortality in ACS-designated Level II centers and undesignated centers was notably higher than in Level I centers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-120; p < 0.0001 and adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; CI, 1.05-1.13; p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured patients with ISS > 15 treated in ACS Level I trauma centers have considerably better survival outcomes than those treated in ACS Level II centers.

Adolescent↗

A Brief Measure of Worry Severity (BMWS): personality and clinical correlates of severe worriers.

This report describes the development of a brief and valid self-report measure to assess severe and dysfunctional worry (the Brief Measure of Worry Severity or BMWS). Using three independent subject groups (clinical and non-clinical), the measure was used to examine the differential severity of worry in depression and anxiety and to examine the clinical and personality correlates of severe worriers. Preliminary psychometric evaluation revealed that the BMWS possesses good construct and clinical discriminant validity. Subjects reporting greater worry severity tended to be more "introverted" and "obsessional," but less "agreeable" and "conscientious." Subjects with depression only, reported less problems with worrying compared to those with co-morbid anxiety disorders. However, among the anxiety disorders, severe and dysfunctional worry was not exclusively experienced by subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This study suggests that pathological worry is not only relevant for patients with GAD, but may be an equally detrimental cognitive activity for patients with panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Adolescent↗

Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) among patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and a low transvalvular gradient (TVG) is associated with improved survival. BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with severe AS with severe LV dysfunction and a low TVG remains controversial. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1998, we evaluated 68 patients who underwent AVR at our institution (AVR group) and 89 patients who did not undergo AVR (control group), with an aortic valve area < or = 0.75 cm(2), LV ejection fraction < or = 35% and mean gradient < or = 30 mm Hg. Using propensity analysis, survival was compared between a cohort of 39 patients in the AVR group and 56 patients in the control group. RESULTS: Despite well-matched baseline characteristics among propensity-matched patients, the one- and four-year survival rates were markedly improved in patients in the AVR group (82% and 78%), as compared with patients in the control group (41% and 15%; p < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, the main predictor of improved survival was AVR (adjusted risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.39; p < 0.0001). The only other predictors of mortality were age and the serum creatinine level. CONCLUSIONS: Among select patients with severe AS, severe LV dysfunction and a low TVG, AVR was associated with significantly improved survival.

Adult↗

Injury Severity Score versus New Injury Severity Score for penetrating injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was introduced in 1997 to improve outcome prediction based on anatomical severity scoring in trauma victims. Studies on populations of blunt trauma victims indicate that the NISS, predicts better than the Injury Severity Score (ISS) mortality post-injury, which is why the NISS has been recommended as the new "gold standard" for severity scoring. However, so far the accuracy of the NISS for penetrating injuries has not been validated against the ISS. METHODS: ISS and NISS scores were collected retrospectively for 1,787 war- and landmine victims in North Iraq. All victims only had penetrating injuries. The two tests were compared for prediction of short-term mortality and post-operative complications using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Both the ISS and the NISS predicted mortality with high accuracy (ROC area under curve 0.9). There were no significant differences between the two tests. The predictive accuracy for post-operative complications was moderate for both tests (ROC-AUC < 0.8), with the NISS performing significantly better than the ISS. CONCLUSION: The NISS does not perform better than the ISS in penetrating injuries. However, this study was done on a low-risk trauma population, thus the results should not be extrapolated to high severity trauma. Due to statistical shortcomings in studies previously published, studies on far larger cohorts are necessary before the NISS should be adopted as the new "gold standard" for severity scoring.

Explosions↗

Development and validation of the Nursing Severity Index. A new method for measuring severity of illness using nursing diagnoses. Nurses of University Hospitals of Cleveland.

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Nursing Severity Index, a new method used to measure the admission severity of illness of hospital patients using nursing diagnoses, which categorize biologic, functional, cognitive, and psychosocial abnormalities. This retrospective cohort study with independent development and testing phases was conducted at a U.S. academic medical center. In the development phase, data regarding 14,183 adult medical-surgical patients admitted to the medical center in 1985 and 1986 was used. In the testing phase, data regarding 7,302 patients admitted in 1987 and 1988 was used. Primary nurses prospectively recorded the presence or absence of 61 nursing diagnoses on admission. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from hospital data bases. In the development phase, the number of admission nursing diagnoses was highly related (P < 0.001) to in-hospital mortality. Using multiple logistic regression, 34 nursing diagnoses were identified as independent predictors of mortality; the Nursing Severity Index equals the number of these 34 diagnoses. In the testing phase of 7,302 patients, the Nursing Severity Index was related (P < 0.001) to mortality rates, which were 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 6%, 13%, 22%, and 31% in seven hierarchical strata defined by the Index. The Index was as accurate in predicting mortality as MedisGroups (receiver-operating-characteristic curve areas, 0.814 +/- 0.016 vs. 0.845 +/- 0.015, respectively, P = 0.12). Furthermore, the Nursing Severity Index and MedisGroups together (receiver operating characteristic curve area 0.880 +/- 0.014), were more accurate (P < 0.01) than either measure alone. The Nursing Severity Index assesses multiple dimensions of illness, can be easily measured during routine patient care, accurately predicts the risk of in-hospital death, and has similar prognostic accuracy as MedisGroups. Its usefulness in outcomes assessment, quality assurance, and case management merits further study.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Severe protein C deficiency predicts early death in severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between measures of baseline disease severity and survival time in patients with severe sepsis. DATA SOURCE: A retrospective evaluation of the placebo group from a large placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial (PROWESS) comprising a total of 840 patients with severe sepsis from 164 medical centers. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data collected included baseline demographics and disease severity measurements, baseline protein C and interleukin-6 levels, 28-day and in-hospital survival rates, and cause of death to 28 days. The survival curve for the placebo patients can be divided into three segments during which the rate of death seemed to be different: the rapid alpha phase (day 0 to day 5), the beta phase (day 6 through day 15), and the gamma phase (day 16 to day 28). The risk of death during each phase was statistically significantly different. More patients died of refractory shock during the alpha phase than in the beta and gamma phases, whereas more patients died of respiratory failure during the beta and gamma phases than during the alpha phase. Multiple organ failure was a frequent cause of death during all phases. Protein C levels at the start of each time interval were highly predictive of outcome within that phase, with continued protein C deficiency being associated with mortality. Patients who died during either the alpha or beta phases had higher interleukin-6 levels at baseline than those who died later or who eventually survived. CONCLUSIONS: The rate and cause of death for patients with severe sepsis differs during the 28-day postdiagnosis period. Severe protein C deficiency (<40% of the level of protein C in pooled normal human plasma) and high interleukin-6 levels were associated with early death that resulted predominantly from refractory shock and multiple organ dysfunction.

Cause of Death↗

Longitudinal studies of inter-alpha inhibitor proteins in severely septic patients: a potential clinical marker and mediator of severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical relevance and prognostic significance of serial measurement of inter-alpha inhibitor proteins (IalphaIp) in severely septic patients. DESIGN: A laboratory-based study of serial plasma samples over the first 5 days of severe sepsis from a prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Small business and academic medical center research laboratories. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-six patients with severe sepsis from a multiple-center phase III clinical trial. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Inter-alpha inhibitor proteins serve as endogenous serine protease inhibitors in human plasma. The levels of IalphaIp were markedly reduced to a mean value of 290+/-15 microg/mL at the onset of severe sepsis compared with normal plasma levels (617+/-197 microg/mL). Failure of IalphaIp levels to recover over the first 5 days of sepsis was associated with an unfavorable outcome (p<.001). IalphaIp levels were inversely correlated with interleukin-6 levels at study entry and over the first 5 days of management of severe sepsis. IalphaIp levels were significantly lower in women, with increased age, in the presence of multiple organ failure and in patients with intra-abdominal sources of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-alpha inhibitor proteins are markedly reduced in severe sepsis, and failure of recovery of IalphaIp levels over the course of sepsis is associated with an unfavorable outcome.

Adult↗