SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Laparoscopic procedures, such as spinal fusions, facilitate patients' faster returns to functioning lifestyles. Fusions using implanted threaded cylinders made of a porous titanium alloy can be performed at the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine levels. This article discusses preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of patients undergoing laparoscopic spinal fusion.
Seventy-five patients who underwent combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion were compared to evaluate the results and safety of staged vs. continuous anterior and posterior spinal fusion. Thirty-five patients underwent two-stage anterior and posterior spinal fusion. The first stage consisted of anterior release; the second stage, which took place 7-10 days later, consisted of posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Forty patients underwent continuous anterior and posterior spinal fusion. This procedure consisted of anterior release followed by immediate posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. The results show that 1) a continuous procedure is faster than the staged procedure; 2) there is less blood loss; 3) fewer days are spent in the hospital; and 4) better correction of the spinal deformity is achieved. Also, the complications were less frequent and less severe with the continuous procedure. It was concluded that the continuous procedure is safe and efficacious and has several advantages over the staged procedure.
STUDY DESIGN: An animal model of posterolateral intertransverse process lumbar spinal fusion using autologous bone, coralline hydroxyapatite, and/or direct current electrical stimulation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of an osteoconductive bone graft substitute and direct-current electrical stimulation on the rate of pseudarthrosis in a rabbit spinal fusion model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conventional techniques for the surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine have a substantial failure rate and associated morbidity. Bone graft substitutes and electrical stimulation are alternative techniques to enhance fusion rates and limit the morbidity associated with posterolateral intertransverse process fusion using autologous iliac crest bone graft. METHODS: Fifty-three adult female New Zealand White rabbits underwent single-level lumbar posterolateral intertransverse process fusion. Animals were assigned to one of four groups using either autologous bone (Group I), coralline hydroxyapatite with autologous bone marrow aspirate (Group II), coralline hydroxyapatite with a 40-microA implantable direct current electrical stimulator and bone marrow aspirate (Group III), or coralline hydroxyapatite with a 100-microA implantable direct current electrical stimulator and bone marrow aspirate (Group IV). Animals were killed at 8 weeks, and fused motion segments were subjected to manual palpation, mechanical testing, and radiographic and histologic analysis to assess the fusion mass. RESULTS: Successful fusion was achieved in 57% (8/14) of animals in Group I, 25% (3/12) in Group II, 50% (6/12) in Group III, and 87% (13/15) in Group IV. Mean stiffness and ultimate load to failure were significantly higher in Group IV than in all other groups (P < 0.05). Histologic analysis demonstrated a qualitative increase in fusion mass in Group IV versus all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Direct-current electrical stimulation increased fusion rates in a dose-dependent manner in a rabbit spinal fusion model. Coralline hydroxyapatite is an osteoconductive bone graft substitute, and thus requires an osteoinductive stimulus to ensure reliable fusion rates. Furthermore, coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation can be used together to increase fusion rates in a rabbit spinal fusion model while avoiding the morbidity associated with harvesting iliac crest bone.
STUDY DESIGN: Posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) was tested in rabbits by implanting composites of rhBMP-2 and collagen carrier. OBJECTIVES: To examine the bone-formation-inducing activity of rhBMP-2 and find the optimal amount of rhBMP to add to a collagen carrier to constitute bone-formation-inducing implants to be substituted for bone graft in posterolateral spinal fusion in rabbits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In animal models, rhBMP-2--impregnated collagen has been successfully used for posterolateral spinal fusion, indicating that it is a potential substitute for the autogenous corticocancellous bone graft currently used most routinely in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Nine rabbits were divided into three equal groups. The bilateral L4-L5 transverse processes were exposed, and collagen strips impregnated with rhBMP-2 (10, 50, or 200 micrograms) were placed on the left transverse processes, and collagen strips alone were inserted on the right. All rabbits were killed 24 weeks after surgery. The implanted sites were assessed for new bone formation and bony fusion by radiography and histologic examination. RESULTS: New bone formation was noted in intertransverse spaces on the left side of all rabbits except one (10 micrograms rhBMP-2). Twelve weeks after implantation, no new bone formation was seen on the right side of all animals. The newly formed bone masses were significantly larger in the 50-microgram and 200-microgram rhBMP-2 groups than in the 10-microgram rhBMP-2 group (P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference between bone formation in the 50-microgram and 200-microgram groups (P = 0.647). CONCLUSIONS: The rhBMP-2/collagen composite implant was an effective bone graft substitute for achieving posterolateral spinal fusion. When combined with a collagen carrier, the optimal rhBMP-2 dose for achieving posterolateral spinal fusion seemed to be approximately 50 micrograms per segment in rabbits.
Since January 1979 spinal fusions for scoliosis have been carried out at the Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute in Milan using normovolaemic haemodilution. The object is to eliminate the risks of blood transfusion and to reduce thromboembolic complications. The method is indicated in patients who are not anaemic and when the blood loss during operation can be controlled. This paper analyses the results in 95 consecutive spinal fusion operations for scoliosis. The authors conclude that the method can be safely used for this type of operation, particularly in young patients with moderate scoliosis (a curve of 50 degrees to 60 degrees). The aim of the operation in these cases is to improve the appearance of the back and prevent further deformity.
To perform decompression of the spinal cord and stabilization of the cervical spine in the patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, subtotal vertebrectomy and spinal fusion of the cervical spine were carried out in 30 patients. In 18 patients, three vertebrectomies and a spinal fusion were carried out, and in 12 patients, four vertebrectomies and a spinal fusion were carried out. Neurologic symptoms that were present before the operations ranged from transverse lesion type myelopathy to motor system syndrome. The patients' symptoms improved significantly after the operations. By the final consultation, the cervical spine motion reduced by about half in the four level vertebrectomy patients and about one third in the three level vertebrectomy patients. No patients reported cervical pain or pain in the arms.
STUDY DESIGN: The efficacy of intrathecal (spinal) morphine in the treatment of pain after posterior spinal fusions was assessed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate improved posterior pain control with fewer side effects in patients with posterior spinal fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After multilevel spinal fusion with instrumentation, patients experience considerable pain that is difficult to treat. METHODS: For this study, 65 patients undergoing elective multilevel posterior spinal instrumentation were randomized to receive spinal morphine as follows: 10 microgram/kg, 20 microgram/kg, or none. These patients were assessed after surgery for pain control and narcotic-associated complications. RESULTS: The patients who received 20 microgram/kg of spinal morphine were more comfortable immediately after surgery, remained pain free for a longer period, and required significantly less additional narcotic. These patients also had fewer respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively high-dose spinal morphine administration provides simple, reliable postoperative pain control after posterior spinal fusions. This may contribute to reduced postoperative respiratory morbidity and an improved outcome.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVES: The results of surgical treatment of osteomyelitis with anterior debridement and fusion followed by delayed posterior stabilization and fusion are presented. METHODS: Forty-two patients with vertebral osteomyelitis are presented. There were 5 cervical, 12 thoracic, 1 thoracolumbar, 19 lumbar, and 5 lumbosacral lesions. The most frequently identified organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Most patients had significant comorbidities, including diabetes, or were immunocompromised. Ninety percent had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive proteins, while white blood cell counts were less reliably elevated. Imaging studies included radiographs, CT scans, and MRIs. All patients were treated with anterior debridement and strut grafting followed by 14.4 days of intravenous antibiotics and delayed instrumented posterior fusions and received 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics after surgery. RESULTS: All patients had resolution of their infections with no recurrence. There were two deaths. Neurologic deficits resolved in all patients. The diagnosis of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis is frequently delayed and presents a significant surgical challenge. The indications for surgical debridement were neurologic compromise, failed medical treatment, soft tissue extension, extensive vertebral body and disc space destruction, and progressive deformity. Many of these patients were severely ill at presentation and required urgent treatment. Anterior debridement and fusion followed by intravenous antibiotics allows for restoration of anterior column support and control of the infection before posterior instrumentation and fusion. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that anterior surgical debridement with fusion, followed by a period of intravenous antibiotics and delayed instrumented posterior fusion, is highly effective in the treatment of pyogenic osteomyelitis that has failed medical management.
Currently, the detection of emerging injury through intraoperative neurologic monitoring is the best way to prevent neurologic injury. This requires a team approach that includes the anesthesiologist, neurophysiologist, and surgeon. The monitoring modalities available for the patient must be considered in planning the anesthetic management. In addition, intraoperative care for the patient requires an ongoing attention to how the anesthetic drugs affect spinal cord monitoring.
Cadaver bone for spinal fusion operations is as safe as autografts. The author's 35 years' experience using cadaver bone for interbody spinal fusion operations has led to the development of a simplified bone bank method. Unsterile bone removed from young, fresh cadavers is cut into appropriate sizes and shapes, washed clean, packaged and sterilized with ethylene oxide gas, then aerated and stored at room temperature. The results of spinal fusion, both cervical and lumbar, using 187 gas-sterilized bone grafts in 58 patients operated on over the past year and half, were reviewed and compared with fusions using autografts or banked bone from proven methods. The rate and percentage of fusion of gas-sterilized bone was comparable to other bone grafts with no untoward complications.
The occurrence and pattern of cervical spinal fusions have been assessed in 59 cases of Apert syndrome (acrocephalosyndactyly type 1). Radiological evidence of vertebral fusion either in progress or completed was observed in 37 (63%) of the cases. Fusion was limited to a single vertebral level in 18 cases and multiple levels, involving either contiguous or skipped levels in the remaining 19+ C3-4 and C5-6 were the levels most commonly involved. This distribution of fusions is different from other instances of congenital spinal fusion including those associated with other varieties of craniosynostosis. There was a significant association between age at the time of radiograph and the presence of spinal fusions (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon 2-sample test). Analysis of sequential radiographs in 17 patients revealed evidence of progressive fusion in 10. Small size of the vertebral body and reduced intervertebral disc space were indicators of subsequent bony fusion. The fusions seen in Apert syndrome thus appear to be progressive, occurring at the site of subtle congenital vertebral anomalies and may not be apparent as a congenital feature. The implications for the aetiology of so-called "congenital' spinal fusions in Apert syndrome and other situations are discussed.
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: To review the available animal and clinical data on biologic enhancements of spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar spinal arthrodesis may result in pseudarthrosis in 5% to 35% of patients. Although much research has focused on the mechanical factors affecting spinal fusion, the use of internal fixation has not eliminated the problem of spinal nonunions. Accordingly, biologic enhancement of spinal fusion has become an important focus of spinal research. METHODS: Medline and hand searches. RESULTS: Electric stimulation, bone graft substitutes, and bone growth factors have been researched most extensively. Electric stimulation and early attempts at bone graft substitutes (allograft, xenograft) have yielded variable results. The feasibility of biologic enhancement of spinal fusion with osteoinductive growth factors has been shown in animals. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of bone growth factors for lumbar fusion remains to be definitively established in humans.
BACKGROUND: A growing number of patients suffer from severe low back pain of discogenic origin that is not responsive to conservative medical management. These patients must consider the option of surgical spinal fusion or minimally-invasive intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing spinal fusion or the intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) procedure for intractable discogenic low back pain. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. METHODS: English-language journal articles published from January 1995 to December 2005 were identified through computerized searches of the PubMed database and bibliographies of identified articles and review papers. Articles were selected if disc degeneration or disruption was the primary indication for spinal fusion or the IDET procedure and if follow-up outcome data included evaluations of back pain severity, condition-specific functional impairment and/or health-related quality of life. The literature reviewed encompassed 33 spinal fusion articles: 10 randomized controlled trials, 1 nonrandomized controlled trial, 9 before-after trials, and 13 case series. There were 18 IDET articles: 2 randomized controlled trial, 2 nonrandomized controlled trials, 11 before- after trials, and 3 case series. Data were extracted and summarized on patient characteristics, surgical methods, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, there were similar median percentage improvements realized after spinal fusion and the IDET procedure, respectively, for 2 of the 3 outcomes evaluated: pain severity (50%, 51%), back function (42%, 14%) and quality of life (46%, 43%). There was an identifiable randomized controlled trials trend of both treatments reporting a smaller magnitude of improvement in all 3 primary outcomes (pain severity, back function, quality of life) compared to other types of trials. Perioperative complications were commonly associated with spinal fusion (median: 14%, range: 2% to 54%, n = 31 study groups) whereas adverse events were rarely experienced with the IDET procedure (median: 0%, range: 0% to 16%, n = 14 studies). Randomized controlled trials of spinal fusion, in particular, had important methodological limitations. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients reported improvement in symptoms following both spinal fusion and the IDET procedure. The IDET procedure appears to offer sufficiently similar symptom amelioration to spinal fusion without the attendant complications.
STUDY DESIGN: The accuracy and interobserver agreement of fine detail radiography and computed tomography (CT) determination of spinal fusion were evaluated in an established animal spine fusion model. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spinal fusion in rabbit posterolateral spine fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The rabbit posterolateral intertransverse process spine fusion model is an established animal model for evaluating bone graft alternatives for spinal fusion. However, little is known regarding the accuracy and interobserver agreement of radiographic determinations of spondylodesis in this model. METHODS: Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits underwent posterolateral spinal fusion. The animals were killed at 9 weeks and the lumbar spine harvested. Manual manipulation, fine detail radiography, and CT images were used to assess spinal fusion. RESULTS: Using manual palpation testing as the standard by which to assess fusion, there was high sensitivity and negative predictive value for both radiographic methods. Positive predictive value, however, was poor (26% fine detail radiography, 61% CT scan). CT correlated better with manual palpation testing when compared with fine detail radiographs. There was substantial interobserver agreement of successful fusion using CT scan imaging (kappa = 0.63) and moderate interobserver agreement radiographs (kappa = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Both radiographic techniques used in the study recorded high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, positive predictive value was poor, especially with fine detail radiographs. Nevertheless, CT with reformatted images did appear to be superior to fine detail radiographs in accurately identifying nonunions in this animal model.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The development of chronic pain after spinal-fusion surgery represents a significant source of morbidity. One of the predictive factors for the development of chronic postsurgical pain is inadequate acute postoperative pain management. Further, the up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) after surgery may result in neuro-plastic changes that may contribute to a progression from acute to chronic pain. The goal of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to examine the effect of perioperative COX-2 inhibition on acute and chronic donor-site pain in patients undergoing spinal-fusion surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled to undergo instrumented posterior spinal fusion were randomized to either receive celecoxib 400 mg 1 hour before surgery, and then 200 mg every 12 hours after surgery for the first 5 days or receive matching placebo at similar time intervals. Patients were administered morphine via patient-controlled analgesia pump for the first 24 hours, and then acetaminophen and oxycodone tablets. Patients were asked to quantify their average pain on postoperative days 1 to 5. At 1 year after surgery, patients were questioned about the presence and subjective characteristics of any residual donor-site pain. RESULTS: Patients administered celecoxib reported lower pain scores and less opioid use during the first 5 postoperative days. Chronic donor-site pain was significantly higher (P<.01) in the placebo group (12 of 40, or 30%) compared with the celecoxib group (4 of 40, or 10%) at 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of celecoxib for the first 5 days after spinal-fusion surgery resulted in improved analgesia and a reduction in chronic donor-site pain at 1 year after surgery.
Anterior spinal fusion (ASF) has been proven to improve curve correction, save motion segments, and decrease the rate of pseudarthrosis when compared with posterior spinal fusion alone. However, in patients with idiopathic scoliosis, the complication rate of the anterior approach to the spine using current techniques has only been scantly defined in the literature. This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent primary ASF for idiopathic scoliosis to determine the prevalence and types of complications specifically related to the anterior approach. All patients who underwent primary ASFs for idiopathic scoliosis done by one of two orthopaedic surgeons between October 1986 and July 1992 were reviewed. Adequate records were available for 98 of 103 patients. The average age at time of surgery was 22 years (range, 10-60 years). Complications were divided into three groups: major (resulting in permanent sequelae or necessitating a second major operation); minor (resulting in a prolonged hospital stay, necessitating a minor operation, and/or resulting in a significant temporary hardship or persistent minor problem); and insignificant (anything less than minor). One of 98 patients had a major complication (a pelvic deep venous thrombosis that required operative thrombectomy). Twenty-five of 98 patients had 28 complications classified as minor, and 28 of 98 patients had 30 complications classified as insignificant. Smoking was a significant risk factor for the development of minor complications. There was no statistically significant relationship between the development of complications and the degree of curve, the approach used, the procedure performed, or the performance of rib resections. The anterior approach to the spine in patients with idiopathic scoliosis in this series was very safe, with only one major complication in 98 patients. However, minor and insignificant complications were quite common, occurring in 45 of 98 patients (46%). Smoking was a significant risk factor for minor complications.
Lumbar spinal fusion is a commonly performed surgical procedure, yet both the indications for its performance and its results remain controversial. It is generally believed that apart from situations where obvious measurable instability exists, a repeat surgical procedure such as spinal fusion does not improve the functional outcome in more than an average of 50% of cases. The aim of this study was to analyse functional outcome after posterolateral lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion, comparing primary and salvage procedures. It was designed as a prospective case/referent study with a 2-year follow-up. A total of 39 patients underwent a short posterior fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) pedicle screw fixation after earlier surgery of the lumbar spine. Two patients were erroneously omitted from the study at the index, so 37 patients were included in the salvage group. In the same period, 69 patients underwent lumbar fusion with pedicle screw fixation (CD) as primary surgery (referent group). Functional outcome was assessed by means of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire preoperatively and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Fusion rates were determined by ordinary X-ray evaluation by two independent observers. Patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery had a significant improvement in functional outcome in terms of daily activity, work and leisure-time activities and anxiety/depression. With regard to social functioning, a significantly inferior outcome was found after the salvage procedure. The return-to-work rates at 2 years after surgery were 50% in the salvage group and 53% in the referent group. There was a significant correlation between radiological evaluation of the fusion mass and the functional outcome. The fusion rate was 76% in the salvage group and 72% in the referent group. This study demonstrates that a posterolateral spinal fusion can be effectively used as a salvage procedure. The functional and radiological outcome of the patients with revision surgery did not differ from those of the group of patients who underwent primary surgery. There was, however a clear indication of inferior social functioning after revision surgery.
Pain drawings have been used in spine surgery for diagnostic use and psychological evaluation of fusion candidates; they have rarely been used to evaluate pain status after spinal fusion. This study is a 5-year follow-up on a randomised clinical trial assigning patients to posterolateral spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients were mailed a pain drawing and questionnaires including questions regarding work, social status, smoking status, the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ), and the Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS). Pain drawings were scored using a visual inspection method and a surface-based point scoring and evaluated for the presence of donor site pain. Pain drawings from 109 patients (87% of the initially included patients), 56 men and 53 women, mean age at follow-up 51 years, were analysed. Fifty-three patients had undergone an instrumented fusion and 56 a non-instrumented fusion. Some presence of low back pain was marked by 79% and leg pain by 69%. Sixty-two percent of the pain drawings were classified as "organic" and 38% as "non-organic". There was no difference between the instrumented and the uninstrumented group. DPQ and LBPRS scores were higher in the non-organic group ( P=0.007). Using the point scoring, no difference between the instrumented and the uninstrumented group was seen. The results of the point scoring were found to correlate with the DPQ and LBPRS scores ( P=0.001). Working patients (39%) had significantly better scores than the rest. Ten percent of the patients had donor site pain. Twenty percent of spinal fusion patients are totally pain free at 5-year follow-up. Ten percent still experience donor site pain. In general, instrumentation does not affect the amount and localisation of pain 5 years after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The pain drawing seems to be a valuable tool when following spinal fusion patients, but its use as prognostic marker in connection with fusion surgery needs further investigation.