Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Propafenone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Enantioselective assay of S+ - and R- -propafenone in human urine by using RP-HPLC with pre-column chiral derivatization.

The enantioselective assay for S(+)- and R(-)-propafenone (PPF) in human urine that developed in this work involves extraction of propafenone from human urine and using S(+)-propafenone as internal standard, chiral derivatization with 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-beta-D-glucopranosyl isothiocyanate, and quantitation by an RP-HPLC system with UV detection (lambda=220 nm). A baseline separation of propafenone enantiomers was achieved on a 5-microm reverse phase ODS column, with a mixture of acetic acid (25:12:0.02,v/v) as mobile phase. There was good linear relationship from 24.9 ng/ml to 1875.0 ng/ml for both of enantiomers. The regression equations of the standard curves based on C(S-PPF) (or C(R-PPF)) versus ratio of A(S-PPF)/A(S) (or A(R-PPF)/A(S)) were y=0.0032x-0.081, (r=0.999) for S-PPF and y=0.0033x+0.0039, (r=0.998) for R-PPF, respectively. The method's limit of detection was 12.5 ng/ml for both enantiomers, and the method's limit of quantitation was 28.2+/-0.52 ng/ml for S-PPF, 30.4+/-methanol:water:glacial 0.53 ng/ml for R-PPF (RSD<8%, n=5). The analytical method yielded average recovery of 98.9% and 100.4% for S-PPF and R-PPF, respectively. The relative standard deviation was no more than 6.11% and 6.22% for S-PPF and R-PPF, respectively. The method enabled study of metabolism of S(+)- and R(-)-propafenone in human urine. The results from 7 volunteers administered 150 mg racemic propafenone indicated that propafenone enantiomers undergo stereoselective metabolism and that in the human body, S(+)-propafenone is metabolized more extensively than R(-)-propafenone.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

Characterisation of (R/S)-propafenone and its metabolites as substrates and inhibitors of P-glycoprotein.

Digoxin is a drug with a narrow therapeutic index, which is a substrate of the ATP-dependent efflux pump P-glycoprotein. Increased or decreased digoxin plasma concentrations occur in humans due to the inhibition or induction of this drug transporter in organs with excretory function such as small intestine, liver and kidney. It is well known that serum concentrations of digoxin increase considerably in humans if propafenone is given simultaneously. However, it has not been investigated in detail whether propafenone and its metabolites are substrates and/or inhibitors of human P-glycoprotein. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the P-glycoprotein-mediated transport and inhibition properties of propafenone and its major metabolites 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-desalkylpropafenone in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated transport by propafenone and its metabolites was determined using digoxin as a P-glycoprotein substrate. No polarised transport was observed for propafenone and N-desalkylpropafenone in Caco-2 cell monolayers. However, 5-hydroxypropafenone translocation was significantly greater from basal-to-apical compared with apical-to-basal (P(app) basal-apical vs. P(app) apical-basal, 10.21+/-2.63 x 10(-6) vs. 4.34+/-1.84 x 10(-6) cm/s; P<0.01). Moreover, propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-desalkylpropafenone inhibited P-glycoprotein-mediated digoxin transport with IC(50) values of 6.8, 19.9, and 21.3 microM, respectively. In summary, whereas propafenone and N-desalkylpropafenone are not substrates of P-glycoprotein, 5-hydroxypropafenone is translocated by human P-glycoprotein across cell monolayers. In addition, propafenone and its two major metabolites 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-desalkylpropafenone are inhibitors of human P-glycoprotein and therefore contribute to the digoxin-propafenone interaction observed in humans.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Blocking effects of the antiarrhythmic drug propafenone on the HERG potassium channel.

Propafenone has been shown to affect the delayed-rectifier potassium currents in cardiomyocytes of different animal models. In this study we investigated effects and mechanisms of action of propafenone on HERG potassium channels in oocytes of Xenopus laevis with the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. Propafenone decreased the currents during voltage steps and the tail currents. The block was voltage-dependent and increased with positive going potentials (from 18% block of tail current amplitude at -40 mV to 69% at +40 mV with 100 micromol/l propafenone). The voltage dependence of block could be fitted with the sum of a monoexponential and a linear function. The fractional electrical distance was estimated to be delta=0.20. The block of current during the voltage step increased with time starting from a level of 83% of the control current. Propafenone accelerated the increase of current during the voltage step as well as the decay of tail currents (time constants of monoexponential fits decreased by 65% for the currents during the voltage step and by 37% for the tail currents with 100 micromol/l propafenone). The threshold concentration of propafenone effect was around 1 micromol/l and the concentration of half-maximal block (IC50) ranged between 13 micromol/l and 15 micromol/l for both current components. With high extracellular potassium concentrations, the IC50 value rose to 80 degrees mol/l. Acidification of the extracellular solution to pH 6.0 increased the IC50 value to 123 micromol/l, alkalization to pH 8.0 reduced it to 10 micromol/l and coexpression of the beta-subunit minK had no statistically significant effect on the concentration dependence. In conclusion, propafenone has been found to block HERG potassium channels. The data suggest that propafenone affects the channels in the open state and give some hints for an intracellular site of action.

Animals↗

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of propafenone, a new antiarrhythmic agent, on the anesthetized, closed-chest dog: comparative study with lidocaine.

The relative hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of a new antiarrhythmic drug, propafenone, and lidocaine were evaluated in eight closed-chest, anesthetized dogs. Propafenone (4 mg/kg intravenously) significantly (p less than 0.05) lowered aortic and pulmonary systolic pressures and caused a rise in heart rate (p less than 0.05). Cardiac output decreased from 4.5 +/- 1 to 3.8 +/- 0.7 L/min (p less than 0.05) during atrial pacing at 400 msec cycle length. Propafenone had no effect on pulmonary and aortic diastolic pressures. Lidocaine (5 mg/kg intravenously) caused a significant (p less than 0.05) decrease in aortic systolic pressure and a rise in heart rate. Lidocaine had no significant effect on the other measured hemodynamic parameters. Propafenone, unlike lidocaine, significantly (p less than 0.05) increased atrioventricular nodal functional refractory period and right ventricular endocardial (apex) cathodal (0.5 +/- 0.1 mA to 1.9 +/- 0.3 mA) and bipolar (1.4 +/- 0.3 to 2.2 +/- 0.4 mA) diastolic excitability threshold. Propafenone, unlike lidocaine, also caused a significant (p = 0.05) intraatrial conduction delay; however, neither drug caused conduction slowing in the His-Purkinje system. Both drugs had no effect on sinus nodal recovery time and on the effective refractory period of the right ventricular endocardium (apex). Mean plasma propafenone levels during hemodynamic and electrophysiologic measurement ranged between 3.2 +/- 1.8 micrograms/ml and 1.7 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml. All of the propafenone-induced effects were reversible within 90 minutes. We conclude that propafenone differs from lidocaine in its atrial, AV nodal, and ventricular electrophysiologic properties, and thus these may explain propafenone's greater efficacy over lidocaine against both certain atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia↗

Effects of propafenone on sinus nodal and ventricular automaticity: in vitro and in vivo correlation.

The electrophysiologic effects of the new antiarrhythmic drug, propafenone, were evaluated in anesthetized closed-chest dogs and on isolated cardiac tissues with the microelectrode technique. Propafenone (2 to 4 mg/kg intravenously) had no effect on sinus rate or on sinus nodal recovery time, but caused a dose-dependent significant decrease in the rate of idioventricular rhythm and increased the duration of ventricular overdrive suppression in dogs (n = 8) with complete atrioventricular block. On isolated canine Purkinje fibers (n = 8) manifesting automaticity with resting membrane potential less negative than -70 mV, propafenone reduced the slope of phase 4 depolarization and reduced the rate of automatic impulse initiation in a concentration-dependent manner (10(-6) M-4.10(-5) M). At these concentrations, propafenone had no effect on rabbit sinus nodal automaticity (n = 8) or on sinoatrial conduction. However, significant depression of sinus nodal automaticity occurred with propafenone concentrations above 5.10(-6) M in the presence of cholinergic or complete autonomic blockade with atropine (10(-6) M) and propranolol (5.10(-5) M). Propafenone caused a concentration-dependent decrease in the disparity of Purkinje fiber-ventricular muscle action potential duration (APD), mainly by shortening Purkinje fiber APD. We conclude: that propafenone suppresses idioventricular rhythm in the intact dog, most likely by depressing Purkinje fiber automaticity; the depressant effect of propafenone on sinus nodal automaticity is evident only during cholinergic receptor blockade; and the antiarrhythmic properties of propafenone may include removal of APD disparity by selective shortening of Purkinje fiber and not of ventricular muscle APD.

Animals↗

Enhanced antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone when used in combination with procainamide or quinidine.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining propafenone with procainamide or quinidine for treating ventricular arrhythmias in patients in whom procainamide or quinidine therapy alone failed to suppress arrhythmias. In 30 patients, the addition of propafenone resulted in a significant reduction of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) frequency compared to drug-free baseline (406 PVC/hr vs 33, p less than 0.001) and to procainamide or quinidine monotherapy (211 PVC/hr vs 27, p less than 0.01). Propafenone alone was also more effective than either procainamide or quinidine and resulted in significant suppression of PVC compared to the drug-free state (406 PVC/hr vs 38, p less than 0.001). However, higher propafenone doses were necessary during monotherapy as compared to propafenone therapy combined with procainamide or quinidine (730 mg/day vs 480 mg/day, p less than 0.001). Of the 30 patients, 22 required an increase in propafenone dose during monotherapy as compared to combination therapy. Thus, propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent when used in combination with type IA antiarrhythmic drugs. With these combinations, lower doses of propafenone can be utilized effectively than with propafenone alone.

Adult↗

Propafenone-mexiletine combination for the treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of combined therapy with propafenone and mexiletine for control of sustained ventricular tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Combination antiarrhythmic drug therapy may enhance efficacy and lead to control of ventricular arrhythmias in some patients. Few reports have studied the combination of class IB and class IC drugs. Thus, this study was designed to investigate a combination of mexiletine and propafenone in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: Sixteen patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia had their clinical arrhythmia induced by programmed stimulation. Procainamide and propafenone alone failed to prevent reinduction of tachycardia in all. Mexiletine was subsequently added to propafenone and programmed stimulation was repeated. RESULTS: With combination therapy ventricular tachycardia was noninducible in three patients (19%). A fourth who had presented with polymorphic ventricular tachycardia had slow bundle branch reentry (cycle length 500 ms) induced. In the other 12, tachycardia cycle length increased from 262 +/- 60 ms at baseline to 350 +/- 82 ms with propafenone and to 390 +/- 80 ms with propafenone plus mexiletine (p less than 0.0001 compared with baseline). Hemodynamic deterioration requiring defibrillation occurred in six patients at baseline study, in five taking propafenone and in two taking both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of propafenone and mexiletine is effective in suppressing the induction of ventricular tachycardia in some patients refractory to procainamide and propafenone alone. In those in whom ventricular tachycardia could still be induced, the rate was slower and hemodynamically tolerated.

Adult↗

Double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of propafenone in suppressing ventricular ectopic activity.

The effectiveness of oral propafenone in treating ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) was assessed with a single-blind dose-ranging trial followed by a double-blind, randomized, crossover comparison of propafenone and placebo. Patients subsequently were treated with propafenone for up to 24 months. During dose ranging, the average of individual percent suppressions was 83% at the largest dose (300 mg/8 hours). During the double-blind trial, the effectiveness of propafenone was confirmed, with 7 of 12 patients achieving greater than or equal to 80% reduction in VPCs (p less than 0.05 versus double-blind placebo study). Propafenone was also effective in controlling couplets and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Seven patients were treated with propafenone for 24 months, during which effectiveness continued, with mean suppression ranging from 67 to 79% (p less than 0.05 versus initial single-blind placebo). Propafenone prolonged PR and QRS intervals by 16 and 18%, respectively; these prolongations continued during long-term therapy. Propafenone increased serum digoxin levels in 5 of 5 patients (mean increase 83%). Cardiovascular side effects included congestive heart failure (1 patient) and conduction abnormalities (3 patients). Thus, propafenone was effective in the treatment of total and repetitive VPCs. Side effects were few, but congestive heart failure, conduction disturbances and increases in serum digoxin were observed.

Aged↗

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of intravenous propafenone in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of a new antiarrhythmic agent, propafenone, in 28 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone was given at a loading dose of 2 mg/kg in all patients. Subsequently, group A, the first 14 patients, received 1 mg/min and group B, the second 14 patients, received 2 mg/min continuous infusion. Propafenone exerted no effect on sinus nodal recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time, but significantly prolonged atrioventricular (AV) nodal and His-Purkinje conduction time and the QRS duration (respectively, 95 +/- 19, 48 +/- 10 and 120 +/- 23 ms before, and 110 +/- 28, 53 +/- 10 and 135 +/- 27 ms after; p less than 0.001). Propafenone did not change the mean arterial blood pressure but slightly increased right atrial, pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures resulting in mild depression of the cardiac index (2.6 +/- 0.8 liters/min per m2 before and 2.3 +/- 0.7 liters/min per m2 after; p less than 0.001). None of the patients were symptomatic from these changes. In group A, propafenone did not affect the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia except for one patient whose arrhythmia was sustained before and become nonsustained after propafenone. In group B, sustained ventricular tachycardia became noninducible in three patients and nonsustained in two patients, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia became noninducible in one patient after propafenone. Therefore, an appropriate loading dose of intravenous propafenone such as 2 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/min infusion may be given safely and may suppress ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone may be a useful addition to currently available antiarrhythmic agents.

Adolescent↗

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of propafenone for treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery.

Fourteen patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter and a ventricular rate of greater than or equal to 120 beats/min occurring after cardiac surgery entered a double-blind placebo-controlled conditional crossover trial of intravenous propafenone. Patients randomly received either propafenone (2 mg/kg body weight) or placebo during a 10 minute intravenous infusion. If 20 minutes after the initiation of this infusion there was no conversion to sinus rhythm, the patient received a second intravenous infusion over 10 minutes (either propafenone or placebo, whichever was not given first). The electrocardiogram was recorded continuously throughout the study. Fourteen patients received propafenone and 10 received placebo. No patient's rhythm converted to sinus rhythm after placebo. In six patients (43%) (p less than 0.001), the arrhythmia converted to sinus rhythm between 5 and 10 minutes after the end of the propafenone infusion. After propafenone, the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation or flutter decreased significantly from 141.6 +/- 15.2 to 116.0 +/- 15.5 beats/min. Ventricular rate did not change after placebo. The mean propafenone plasma concentration was 3.46 +/- 2.17 mg/liter. The only side effect of propafenone noted was a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 9 +/- 9 mm Hg. Propafenone was useful for management of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery both for control of rapid ventricular response and for conversion to sinus rhythm.

Adult↗

Efficacy of propafenone in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: electrophysiologic findings and long-term follow-up.

The efficacy and safety of intravenous propafenone was studied in 10 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and in 2 patients with a concealed accessory pathway. During electrophysiologic study, the effect of propafenone on the effective refractory period of the accessory pathway was determined, as well as its effect during orthodromic atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Propafenone caused significant increases in the accessory pathway refractory period, both in the anterograde direction (290 +/- 19 versus 474 +/- 50 ms, p less than 0.05) and in the retrograde direction (238 +/- 15 versus 408 +/- 44 ms, p less than 0.05). Complete anterograde accessory pathway conduction block occurred in four patients. Sustained AV reentrant tachycardia was inducible in 11 patients before administration of propafenone. Drug infusion during AV reentrant tachycardia promptly terminated arrhythmia in 10 of these 11 patients and caused slowing of AV reentrant tachycardia in the remaining patient. Before propafenone, sustained atrial fibrillation was inducible in six patients and nonsustained atrial fibrillation in four patients. After propafenone, no patient had inducible sustained atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, propafenone caused a marked decrease in peak ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Eight patients have been treated with oral propafenone and followed up for 12 +/- 2 months. All have remained virtually free of recurrent arrhythmia and none has developed significant side effects. Propafenone is a very promising agent for emergency intravenous therapy as well as long-term oral therapy in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Adolescent↗

Different stereoselective effects of (R)- and (S)-propafenone: clinical pharmacologic, electrophysiologic, and radioligand binding studies.

Propafenone is a class 1c antiarrhythmic agent with moderate beta-blocking activity as a result of a structural similarity to beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. In a randomized, double-blind crossover exercise study, eight healthy volunteers were examined before and 2 1/2 hours after oral administration of 300 mg (R,S)-, 150 mg (R)-, and 150 mg (S)-propafenone hydrochloride. The mean rate pressure product was significantly reduced by (R,S)-propafenone hydrochloride (-5.2%; p = 0.045) and half-dosed (S)-propafenone hydrochloride (-5.9%; p = 0.013), whereas the (R)-enantiomer caused no significant changes. There was a significant difference between the effects of (R)- and (S)-propafenone (p = 0.033). In beta-adrenoceptor-binding inhibition experiments with (S)-(125I)iodocyanopindolol in a sarcolemma-enriched cardiac membrane preparation, the eudismic ratio of (S)- over (R)-propafenone was 54. On the spontaneously beating Langendorff-perfused guinea pig heart, 3 x 10(-6) mol/L of both (R)- and (S)-propafenone resulted in significant changes (p less than 0.01) on His bundle conduction (+79% +/- 27% and +69% +/- 9%), as well as comparable decreases in the maximal rate of pacing with 1:1 conduction of the atrial (-54% +/- 10% and -57% +/- 8%) and ventricular myocardium (-42% +/- 6% and -43% +/- 6%), indicating equal effects in sodium channel-dependent antiarrhythmic class 1 activity. Thus (R)- and (S)-propafenone exert different beta-blocking actions but equal effects on the sodium channel-dependent antiarrhythmic class 1 activity. More specific antiarrhythmic class 1 therapy with reduction of beta-blocking side effects may be attained with optically pure (R)-propafenone hydrochloride instead of the currently used racemic mixture.

Administration, Oral↗

Inhibitory effects of propafenone on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine in humans.

CYP1A2 is involved in the metabolism of both caffeine and propafenone, a class Ic antiarrhythmic agent. Despite the widespread consumption of caffeine, drug-drug interactions with this agent are often overlooked. This study investigated effects of propafenone on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine. Eight healthy volunteers were included in our study. A total of 300 mg of caffeine was given on 2 occasions, once alone and once during the coadministration of 300 mg propafenone. Serial blood samples were collected and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic approach. A one-compartment PK model with first-order absorption and elimination described plasma concentration profiles. Concomitant administration of propafenone decreased caffeine oral clearance from 8.3 +/- 0.9 L/h to 5.4 +/- 0.7 L/h (P < 0.05). Elimination half-life of caffeine was also increased 54% by propafenone. One of our volunteers was a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6. Concomitant administration of propafenone to this volunteer caused the greatest increase in caffeine plasma concentrations. These results support the concept of competitive inhibition between propafenone and caffeine. Our results suggest that propafenone causes significant inhibition of CYP1A2 activity leading to a decrease in the clearance of caffeine. Caffeine has intrinsic proarrhythmic effects; thus, its coadministration with an antiarrhythmic agent such as propafenone should be used with caution, especially in patients with poor CYP2D6 activity.

Adolescent↗

Effect of steroid eluting versus conventional electrodes on propafenone induced rise in chronic ventricular pacing threshold.

The aim of this study was to evaluate chronic ventricular pacing threshold increase after oral propafenone therapy. Eighty-three patients affected by advanced atrioventricular block and sick sinus syndrome were studied at least 3 months after pacemaker implantation, before and after oral propafenone therapy (450-900 mg/day based on body weight). The patients were subdivided into three groups according to the type of unipolar electrode that was implanted: group I (41 patients) Medtronic CapSure 4003, group II (30 patients) Medtronic Target Tip 4011, and group III (12 patients) Osypka Vy screw-in lead. In all cases a Medtronic unipolar pacemaker was implanted: 30 Minix, 23 Activitrax, 14 Elite, 12 Legend, and 4 Pasys. Propafenone blood level was measured in 75 patients 3-5 hours after propafenone administration. The pacing autothreshold was measured at 0.8 V, 1.6 V, and 2.5 V by reducing pulse width. At the three different outputs before and after propafenone, threshold increments were significantly lower in group I in comparison with group II and group III (propafenone ranging from < 0.001 to < 0.05). No significant difference was found in pacing impedance or in propafenone plasma concentration in the three groups. Strength-duration curves were drawn for each group at baseline and after propafenone administration. Before propafenone, in group I, the knee was markedly shifted to the left and downward as compared to the classic curve, so that the steep part was predominant; in group II and group III this shift was progressively less evident.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

Amiodarone, sotalol, or propafenone in atrial fibrillation: which is preferred to maintain normal sinus rhythm?

UNLABELLED: This randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone, propafenone and sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The population consisted of 214 consecutive patients (mean age 64 +/- 8 years, 106 men) with recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. After restoration of sinus rhythm, patients were randomized to amiodarone (200 mg/day), propafenone (450 mg/day) or sotalol (320 +/- 20 mg/day). Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months, and at 3-month intervals thereafter. The proportion of patients developing recurrent atrial fibrillation and/or experiencing unacceptable adverse effects was measured in the three groups by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Recurrent atrial fibrillation occurred in 25 of the 75 patients treated with amiodarone compared to 51 of the 75 patients treated with sotalol and 24 of the 64 patients treated with propafenone. Fourteen patients treated with amiodarone, five with sotalol, and one with propafenone experienced adverse effects while in sinus rhythm, necessitating discontinuation of treatment (P < 0.001 for amiodarone and propafenone vs sotalol). The difference between amiodarone and propafenone was statistically nonsignificant when all events were included in the analysis. However, if the analysis was limited to recurrent atrial fibrillation events, amiodarone was more effective than propafenone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone and propafenone were superior to sotalol in maintaining long-term normal sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone tended to be superior to propafenone, though its long-term efficacy was limited by adverse side effects.

Administration, Oral↗

Propafenone preferentially blocks the rapidly activating component of delayed rectifier K+ current in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Voltage-independent and time-dependent block of the slowly activating component.

The effects of propafenone on the delayed rectifier K+ current were studied in guinea pig ventricular myocytes by using the patch-clamp technique. In these myocytes, this current consists of at least two components: a La(3+)-sensitive component activating rapidly with moderate depolarizations and a La(3+)-resistant current slowly activating at more positive potentials. In the absence of La3+ (when both components are present), propafenone inhibited the delayed outward current, its effects being more marked after weak than after strong depolarizations. Propafenone-induced block of the tail currents elicited on return to -30 mV was more marked after short than after long depolarizing pulses. In the presence of 1 mumol/L propafenone, the envelope-of-tails test was satisfied, thus indicating that at this concentration propafenone completely blocks the rapidly activating component. In the presence of La3+ (when only the slow component is present), the steady state inhibition induced by 5 mumol/L propafenone on both the maximum activated and the tail currents was independent of the test pulse voltage. Development of propafenone-induced block on the slowly activating component was very fast and linked to channel opening. In addition, the blockade appeared to be use dependent, with the rate constant of the onset kinetics at 2 Hz being 0.44 +/- 0.1 pulse-1. The recovery process from propafenone-induced block exhibited a time constant of 2.5 +/- 0.4 s. These results indicated that propafenone preferentially inhibits the rapidly activating component of the delayed rectifier and that it blocks in a voltage-independent and time-dependent manner the slow component of this current.

Animals↗

Propafenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias.

Propafenone is a Class I antiarrhythmic agent with weak beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity which can be given both intravenously and orally. Dosage must be individualised because of dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, a wide range of clinically effective plasma concentrations (64 to 3271 micrograms/L) after comparable doses, the presence of an active metabolite (5-hydroxy-propafenone) and genetically determined metabolic oxidation. In non-comparative studies propafenone 450 and 900 mg/day orally significantly suppressed premature ventricular complexes and couplets in 96% and 75% of patients, respectively, and abolished ventricular tachycardia in 75% of patients. Efficacy was confirmed in placebo-controlled studies in which propafenone 300 to 900mg daily suppressed premature ventricular complexes (greater than 80%) in 77% of patients; 87% of patients had significant reductions in couplets and abolition of ventricular tachycardia. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents, propafenone 450 to 1200 mg/day suppressed arrhythmias in 63% of patients (in long term therapy 66%). Electrically induced arrhythmias were prevented by intravenously administered propafenone in 12 to 23% of patients. However, long term oral therapy was effective in 77% of patients selected using programmed electrical stimulation. Propafenone was also effective in suppressing atrial and AV nodal/junctional re-entrant tachycardias and Wolff-Parkinson-White tachycardias involving accessory pathways. A limited number of comparisons with other antiarrhythmic drugs indicate that the antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone is superior or similar to that of quinidine, disopyramide and tocainide, and comparable to that of lignocaine (lidocaine), flecainide and metoprolol against ventricular arrhythmias and a smaller number of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovascular side effects indicate a proarrhythmic effect similar to that with other Class I drugs, occasional precipitation of congestive heart failure and conduction abnormalities; the latter two occur more often in patients with underlying ventricular dysfunction. Non-cardiovascular side effects (neurological, gastrointestinal) are well tolerated and generally resolve with continued therapy or dosage reduction. Thus, propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent, and is a useful addition to currently available drugs, although further studies will be required to determine clearly its place in therapy compared with more established antiarrhythmic drugs.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

Propafenone modulates potassium channel activities of vascular smooth muscle from rat portal veins.

We have studied the effects of the class Ic antiarrhythmic propafenone on K+ currents in freshly isolated smooth muscle cells from rat portal veins and on the spontaneous contractions in whole tissues. Under Ca2+-free conditions, when cells were clamped at -80 mV (whole-cell configuration) depolarizing steps from -80 to +50 mV induced a family of K+ currents (I(Ktotal)) that mainly comprised the delayed rectifier current [I(K(V))], whereas when held at -10 mV only small-amplitude, noninactivating, currents (I(NI)) were recorded. Propafenone (10 microM) markedly inhibited I(Ktotal), but at potentials positive to +30 mV it also induced a noisy outwardly rectifying current [I(BK(Ca))] that was abolished by iberiotoxin (0.1 microM). Inhibition of I(Ktotal) by propafenone was concentration-dependent (EC50 = 0.059 +/- 0.009 microM). Propafenone also inhibited the transient outward current [I(K(A))] and ATP-sensitive potassium current [I(K(ATP))] induced by levcromakalim (10 microM). Inhibition of I(K(V)), I(K(A)), and I(K(ATP)) by propafenone was voltage-independent. In Ca(2+)-containing conditions propafenone inhibited I(K(V)) and I(BK(Ca)) and immediately abolished spontaneous outward transient K+ currents. In whole veins, propafenone behaved as the K(V) inhibitor 4-aminopyridine, increasing the amplitude and duration of spontaneous contractions. Propafenone also inhibited the inhibitory effects of the K(ATP) channel opener levcromakalim on spontaneous contractions. These results indicate that in vascular smooth muscle cells, propafenone inhibits K(V), K(A), BK(Ca), and K(ATP) channels. These actions correlated with its effects on mechanical activity in whole portal veins.

Animals↗