[Military physician, sport physician, industrial physician].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the attitudes of Dutch general practitioners and nursing home physicians to voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHOD: Data were collected by means of anonymous postal questionnaires to be completed by a random sample of 521 general practitioners from the province of North Holland, 521 general practitioners from the rest of the Netherlands, and 713 Dutch nursing home physicians who were members of the Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians. RESULTS: The written responses of general practitioners and nursing home physicians to six statements about voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide showed that a large majority had a fairly positive attitude to euthanasia and suicide. This finding also emerged from the scores obtained on a scale compiled on the basis of the statements. General practitioners and nursing home physicians were more opposed to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide if they had never performed it, if they belonged to a religious group, or if they were older. CONCLUSION: Dutch general practitioners and nursing home physicians have a fairly positive attitude toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. However, the majority of these physicians favor a policy of voluntary active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide under strict conditions.
The purpose of this exploratory study was to survey physicians' attitudes surrounding the 'gift relationship' between pharmaceutical companies and physicians. A survey was mailed to 1000 randomly selected West Virginia physicians, of which 283 (28.3%) responses were received. The most commonly received gifts reported by the study physicians were trinkets (77.4%), followed by books (41.7%) and meals (41%). Principal component analysis and varimax rotation identified seven physician belief constructs. The mean ratings of the constructs indicated that the physicians slightly agreed that pharmaceutical companies give gifts to physicians to influence their prescribing, moderately disagreed that they do so as a form of professional recognition of physicians, and strongly disagreed that their prescribing behaviour could be influenced by the gifts they receive. Physicians slightly disagreed that pharmaceutical companies' sponsoring of CME programmes are only promotional gimmicks. Although the study physicians slightly disagreed that it may be inappropriate for them to accept gifts from pharmaceutical companies, they seemed slightly averse to having 'gift relationships' between pharmaceutical companies and physicians made public. Correlation analysis suggested that physicians who have a large number of patients in their practice, see a larger number of patients per day, or write a large number of prescriptions per day are more likely to be offered gifts by pharmaceutical companies, and they are also more likely to condone the practice of gift giving and receiving.
Physician extenders (PE) can perform some tasks usually performed by a physician. Time recouped by physicians using a PE may increase physician productivity and physician professional satisfaction. A prospective study was completed using a PE in an outpatient general medical group practice setting to reduce physician indirect patient care, such as responding to patient telephone calls, refilling prescriptions, triage, and order entry. Physicians using a PE had increased productivity relative to physicians who did not use a PE. Physician satisfaction with the PE model was excellent. A physician extender may improve physician productivity by performing indirect patient care usually performed by physicians.
This is part 1 of a 2-part paper on ethics and physician-industry relationships. Part 1 offers advice to individual physicians; part 2 gives recommendations to medical education providers and medical professional societies. Physicians and industry have a shared interest in advancing medical knowledge. Nonetheless, the primary ethic of the physician is to promote the patient's best interests, while the primary ethic of industry is to promote profitability. Although partnerships between physicians and industry can result in impressive medical advances, they also create opportunities for bias and can result in unfavorable public perceptions. Many physicians and physicians-in-training think they are impervious to commercial influence. However, recent studies show that accepting industry hospitality and gifts, even drug samples, can compromise judgment about medical information and subsequent decisions about patient care. It is up to the physician to judge whether a gift is acceptable. A very general guideline is that it is ethical to accept modest gifts that advance medical practice. It is clearly unethical to accept gifts or services that obligate the physician to reciprocate. Conflicts of interest can arise from other financial ties between physicians and industry, whether to outside companies or self-owned businesses. Such ties include honorariums for speaking or writing about a company's product, payment for participating in clinic-based research, and referrals to medical resources. All of these relationships have the potential to influence a physician's attitudes and practices. This paper explores the ethical quandaries involved and offers guidelines for ethical business relationships.
Although physician appearance has been a topic of interest to medical historians for more than two centuries, little objective investigation has been made into patients' and physicians' attitudes toward the physician's appearance. This study analyzed responses from 404 patients, residents, and staff physicians regarding their attitudes toward various aspects of the male and female physician's professional appearance. Positive responses from all participants were associated with traditional items of dress such as the dress, shirt and tie, dress shoes, and nylons, and for physician-identifying items such as a white coat and a name tag. Negative responses were associated with casual items such as blue jeans, scrub suits, athletic shoes, clogs, and sport socks. Negative ratings were also associated with overly feminine items such as prominent ruffles and female dangling earrings and such temporarily fashionable items as long hair on men, male earrings, and patterned hose on women. Overall, patients were less discriminating in their attitude toward physician appearance than physicians. Patients rated traditional items less positively and casual items less negatively. This study confirms the importance of the physician's appearance in physician-patient communication.
Inpatients' use of medical care and their satisfaction with their physicians were examined comparing the patients of three part-time physicians and five full-time physicians in an internal medicine group practice at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. In one study, by chart review over a seven-month period in 1988, each patient's length of stay and severity of illness were measured. A total of 58 cases were reviewed: 34 from full-time physicians and 24 from part-time physicians. When matched for severity of illness, there was no difference in lengths of stay between the patients of the part-time and those of the full-time physicians. In a second study, on interviewer-administered questionnaires completed over a ten-month period in 1986-1987, 60 patients gave satisfaction ratings of their primary physicians: 36 with full-time physicians and 24 with part-time physicians. Patients' satisfaction was equally high for both groups of physicians. The authors suggest that since more women physicians in internal medicine are demanding part-time work, and since part-time arrangements have been criticized as having adverse effects on patient care, their findings may contribute to more enlightened attitudes towards physicians who choose part-time status.
Although nutrition is an important part of medical care, nutrition education is not provided in most training programs for physicians in the United States, resulting in limited nutrition knowledge among physicians and limited nutritional care of patients. A nutrition education program was provided by a physician nutrition specialist in a family practice residency program. For 6 mo, the nutrition specialist provided the family physicians with recommendations for nutritional care for their patients. The effects of the education program on residents' and faculty physicians' nutrition knowledge and nutritional patient care, patients' perceptions of the importance of nutrition, and physicians' dietary patterns were determined by pre- and post-intervention nutrition exams for physicians and patients, patient questionnaires about attitudes toward nutrition, chart reviews, and physicians' diet records. The nutrition education program resulted in an increase in physicians' nutrition knowledge scores (P < 0.01) and an increase in the frequency with which physicians discussed nutrition and recommended diets for their patients (P < 0.05). This suggests that nutrition education by a physician nutrition specialist within a family practice residency program can be effective in increasing nutritional care provided to patients.
BACKGROUND: Public use of the Internet for health information is increasing but its effect on health care is unclear. We studied physicians' experience of patients looking for health information on the Internet and their perceptions of the impact of this information on the physician-patient relationship, health care, and workload. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a nationally-representative sample of United States physicians (1050 respondents; response rate 53%). RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of respondents had experienced a patient bringing Internet information to a visit. The quality of information was important: accurate, relevant information benefited, while inaccurate or irrelevant information harmed health care, health outcomes, and the physician-patient relationship. However, the physician's feeling that the patient was challenging his or her authority was the most consistent predictor of a perceived deterioration in the physician-patient relationship (OR = 14.9; 95% CI, 5.5-40.5), in the quality of health care (OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.9), or health outcomes (OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.7). Thirty-eight percent of physicians believed that the patient bringing in information made the visit less time efficient, particularly if the patient wanted something inappropriate (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.4), or the physician felt challenged (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.2). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of information on the Internet is paramount: accurate relevant information is beneficial, while inaccurate information is harmful. Physicians appear to acquiesce to clinically-inappropriate requests generated by information from the Internet, either for fear of damaging the physician-patient relationship or because of the negative effect on time efficiency of not doing so. A minority of physicians feels challenged by patients bringing health information to the visit; reasons for this require further research.
Referral of a patient from a primary care provider to a referral specialist physician for consultation is an important link in the continuum of patient care. Although the relationship between the physician assistant (PA) and supervising physician has been studied extensively, the effectiveness of the relationship between the primary care PA and the referral specialist physician is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes of the referral specialist physician toward direct referral of patients from primary care PAs. A random sample of 5,000 specialist physicians in five specialty areas across the United States were surveyed to determine their willingness to accept referrals from PAs, their attitudes about the appropriateness of PA referrals, and reasons for dissatisfaction, if any. Data analysis revealed that specialist physicians generally are willing to accept patient referrals from primary care PAs and that specialist physicians generally are satisfied with the appropriateness and timeliness of referrals from PAs. Whether or not the specialist physician employed (supervised) a PA in his or her own practice made a significant difference in level of satisfaction with PA referral. To determine the significance of these results, more research is needed to determine specialist physician satisfaction with referrals from primary care physicians compared with PAs.
The relationship between physicians and physician extender occupations is considered in light of the stratification of medical care workers. Professional dominance between various medical occupations and professional competition among physicians are considered. Data from a national sample of physicians taken in 1981 are used to determine 1) under what conditions physicians are likely to consider the employment of physician extenders helpful for improving quality of care and 2) which characteristics and available resources are associated with the belief that the employment of physician extenders will improve medical care. Of four different service populations considered, physicians are most likely to think that the use of physician extenders to care for the urban poor will aid care and are least likely to think that their employment will improve care for obstetrics and pediatrics cases. The results indicate that physicians' beliefs regarding the employment of physician extenders are dependent on the clientele as well as on the relative position of the two occupational groups in the hierarchy of medical care occupations.
OBJECTIVES: To examine differences attributable to sex of family physicians in their practices and in their perceptions of sexual history taking and safer sex counseling, and to ascertain whether sex of physicians influences counseling about condoms. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Quebec family practices. PARTICIPANTS: Recently graduated (1991) Quebec family physicians: 54 men and 92 women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency and content of sexual history, frequency of safer sex counseling, perceived level of comfort in taking a sexual history, perceived adequacy of medical training to take sexual histories, perceived difficulty with sexual history taking according to patients' characteristics, and perceived effectiveness of safer sex counseling. RESULTS: Response rate was 80% of 183 physicians contacted. There were few differences attributable to sex of physician in family physicians' practices and perceptions regarding sexual history taking. Men's perceptions regarding the difficulty of sexual history taking did not vary according to patient's sex, but most women reported more difficulty with male patients. Male physicians reported more difficulty with teenagers; female physicians experienced more difficulty questioning adults. More than 85% of male and female physicians reported recommending condom use to a patient in their practice at least weekly. Women physicians seemed to do more condom-related counseling than their male colleagues, even after controlling for other variables. Salaried practice in a local community health centre did not influence condom-related counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Women family physicians are more inclined than men to counsel patients about condom use. Increasing numbers of women in family practice could have a beneficial effect on prevention of STDs and undesired pregnancies.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in outpatient settings has not been shown to be as effective in reducing mortality and improving health as in hospital settings; this difference has been attributed in part to a lack of direct control over recommendation implementation. OBJECTIVE: To identify inhibiting and facilitating factors in physicians' compliance with consultative CGA recommendations, so that the effectiveness of outpatient CGA might be improved. METHODS: A 49-item questionnaire was administered via the telephone to 87 eligible community primary care physicians in Los Angeles, Calif, whose patients had received consultative outpatient CGAs as part of a study of CGA (response rate, 96%). The questionnaire assessed physician compliance with CGA recommendations, reasons for implementing or not implementing the recommendations, and specific physician attitudes, perceptions, and characteristics. The focus of the interview was the CGA recommendation that was determined to be the "most important" by the evaluating geriatrician. Recommendations addressed geriatric syndromes, general medical problems, or psychiatric conditions. RESULTS: Of the 87 physician respondents, 62 (71%) implemented the most important recommendation. In multivariate analysis, 4 variables were predictive of physician compliance: (1) a patient's request that the recommendation be implemented (odds ratio [OR], 10.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-61.3; P = .007); (2) perceived legal liability resulting from nonimplementation of the recommendation (OR, 10.8; 95% CI, 1.1-108.2; P = .04); (3) female physician gender (OR, 9.6; 95% CI, 1.4-67.9; P = .04); and (4) perceived cost-effectiveness of the recommendation (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.6-30.5; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient behavior, which may be modifiable, was among the strongest determinants of physician compliance with recommended care. Specifically, when patients requested that a recommendation be implemented, physicians were highly likely to comply. Changing patient behavior within the physician-patient relationship as a way of effecting desired changes in physician health care practices merits further attention.
BACKGROUND: Despite major changes in health care, the prevalence and predictors of career satisfaction have not recently been comprehensively studied in either women or men physicians. METHODS: The Women Physicians' Health Study surveyed a nationally representative random sample (n = 4501 respondents; response rate, 59%) of US women physicians. Using univariate and logistic regression analyses, we examined personal and professional characteristics that were correlated with 3 major outcomes: career satisfaction, desire to become a physician again, and desire to change one's specialty. RESULTS: Women physicians were generally satisfied with their careers (84% usually, almost always, or always satisfied). However, 31% would maybe, probably, or definitely not choose to be a physician again, and 38% would maybe, probably, or definitely prefer to change their specialty. Physician's age, control of the work environment, work stress, and a history of harassment were independent predictors of all 3 outcomes, with younger physicians and those having least work control, most work stress, or having experienced severe harassment reporting the most dissatisfaction. The strongest association (odds ratio, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3-17.5; P<.001) was between work control and career satisfaction. Other significant predictors (P<.01) of outcomes included birthplace, ethnicity, sexual orientation, having children, stress at home, religious fervor, mental health, specialty, practice type, and workload. CONCLUSIONS: Women physicians generally report career satisfaction, but many, if given the choice, would not become a physician again or would choose a different specialty. Correctable factors such as work stress, harassment, and poor control over work environment should be addressed to improve the recruitment and retention of women physicians.
Despite criticisms of the quality of health care for women and considerable research on sex differences in illness behavior and utilization of health services, little research has addressed the potential impact of physician gender on the physician-patient relationship and its outcomes. With the entry of more women into the medical profession, opportunities to investigate effects of physician gender will increase. A theoretical rationale for expecting physician gender to affect the key dimensions of the interactive physician-patient relationship (communication of information, affective tone, negotiative quality) and its outcomes (satisfaction, compliance, health status) is presented. Physician gender might impact on the relationship through three mechanisms: sex differences among physicians, particularly with respect to sex-role attitudes; patients' different expectations of male and female physicians; or increased status congruence between physician and patient in same-sex, as compared to opposite-sex, physician-patient dyads. Recent research related to these topics is discussed and found to support the plausibility of these mechanisms of potential gender effects. Some methodological suggestions for future research are presented, including the suggestion that future research identify specific conditions under which physician gender effects might be more salient.
OBJECTIVE: Many young physicians are women, and many are in their childbearing years. Knowing pregnant physicians' status is useful for epidemiological and workforce reasons, yet no studies have compared pregnant with same-age, non-pregnant physicians, an especially appropriate comparison group. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Women Physicians' Health Study, a national questionnaire-based survey. We compare 87 pregnant with 1148 non-pregnant women physicians, ages 30-40. RESULTS: Pregnant physicians ate more fat, fruits and vegetables, and cheese, but not more dairy than non-pregnant women physicians. While nearly half consumed alcohol, they reported drinking an average of only 0.4 drinks/week, and none smoked. Nearly all took vitamin supplements. Pregnant physicians exercised as much as non-pregnant physicians, and pregnant physicians' self-reported health status was better. Work amount, desire to work less, perceived work control, career satisfaction, and work stress did not significantly differ by pregnancy status. CONCLUSION: The prenatal period may be a time of especially healthy habits and considerable productivity for female physicians.