Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pemetrexed”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Protection of hematopoietic stem cells from pemetrexed toxicity by retroviral gene transfer with a mutant dihydrofolate reductase-mutant thymidylate synthase fusion gene.

Myelosuppression is one of the major side effects of most anticancer drugs. To confer myeloprotection, our laboratory generated drug-resistant mutants of select target human enzymes for gene transfer to the bone marrow. Mutants of two of these enzymes, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR F/S) and thymidylate synthase (TS G52S), were previously shown to confer resistance to methotrexate and 5-FU, respectively, and recently a fusion cDNA of both mutant enzymes (DHFR F/S-TS G52S) was shown to confer dual resistance to both antimetabolites. In this study, we examined the sensitivity of the DHFR F/S-TS G52S fusion protein to the multitargeted antifolate, pemetrexed (LY231514, Alimta), which targets both DHFR and TS and is currently in phase III trials for the treatment of solid tumors and in combination with cisplatin has been shown to be an advance in the treatment of mesothelioma. The K(i) for the DHFR F/S portion of the purified fusion protein to pemetrexed was increased by greater than 9000-fold when compared to wtDHFR (8000 versus 0.86 nM), while the K(i) for the TS G52S portion of the fusion protein to pemetrexed was similar to that of wtTS (2.8 versus 3.1 nM). When the fusion gene was retrovirally transduced into NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, the IC(50) to pemetrexed was three- to four-fold higher than cells transduced with DHFR F/S or TS G52S alone (163 versus 53 and 45 nM, respectively). Similarly, expression of the DHFR F/S-TS G52S fusion gene in retrovirally transduced mouse marrow cells resulted in an increased survival of CFU-GM colonies when compared to cells transduced with either of the mutants alone. Co-expression of mutant DHFR and TS enzymes has additive effects in conferring resistance to pemetrexed-induced toxicity. This construct may be useful for conferring myeloprotection to patients receiving this drug.

Animals↗

Pemetrexed in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma.

Gastrointestinal tumors are among the most common cancers in the world. Palliative chemotherapy is widely used to treat patients with advanced or metastatic disease. The mainstay of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin (LV), alone or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan (CPT-11). Gemcitabine is currently the standard of care in patients with pancreatic cancer. There is no standard in gastric cancer, although cisplatin, 5-FU, and the anthracyclines are the most common drugs used. Pemetrexed, a new-generation antifolate antimetabolite, has demonstrated a 15% to 17% response rate in metastatic colorectal cancer, similar to those of other single agents in previously untreated patients. In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, pemetrexed achieved a 6% response rate and a 28% 1-year survival rate, which is comparable to single-agent gemcitabine. Preliminary results in gastric cancer are encouraging. The generally mild side effect profile of pemetrexed, especially with folate supplementation and dexamethasone premedication, and the synergy between pemetrexed and drugs frequently used in gastrointestinal cancers, such as irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and gemcitabine, suggest that further clinical studies are indicated to determine the role of pemetrexed in the treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, and gastric cancers.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

Pemetrexed combination therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Until recently, the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited to the cisplatin combinations, including a small number of cytotoxic drugs. More recently, combinations with taxanes and gemcitabine have slightly improved outcome. However, when the literature is revisited, it can be realized that older drugs such as nitrogen mustard have some degree of activity in NSCLC, traditionally considered a chemoresistant tumor. However, drugs that are mostly ineffective when used as single agents, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have significant activity when combined with cisplatin in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. 5-FU constitutes the backbone of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients. 5-FU is equally interesting because it permits investigation of thymidylate synthase (TS) levels as a genetic target for predicting response and survival. The assessment of TS levels and ERCC1 as a marker of cisplatin resistance is leading to customized chemotherapy. The possibility of discriminating cisplatin resistance is particularly attractive in choosing between cisplatin and non-cisplatin combinations in the treatment of NSCLC. We have reviewed phase I and II studies of pemetrexed in NSCLC. The response rate is approximately 20% with single-agent pemetrexed and approximately 40% in combination with cisplatin. This combination has mild to moderate toxicity. Other synergistic combinations that should be explored include pemetrexed with gemcitabine, CPT-11, docetaxel, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin. In the future, pharmacogenomically oriented chemotherapy trials should be undertaken based on the accumulated evidence that several genetic markers, such as ERCC1, beta-tubulin mutations, and loss of heterozygosity in the region of the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase, can predict resistance to cisplatin, taxanes, or gemcitabine, respectively. Mechanisms of resistance to pemetrexed need to be investigated, including the potential role of TS messenger RNA. In summary, pemetrexed has emerged as a promising new cytotoxic drug in the arsenal of chemotherapy treatments for NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Pemetrexed in pancreatic cancer.

New drugs are clearly needed for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, a disease refractory to most chemotherapy. Pemetrexed, a novel antifolate, inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase, and aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. Pemetrexed is active against pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. Two partial responses in pancreatic cancer patients were observed in a phase I trial of pemetrexed. This led to a phase II trial of pemetrexed in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The objective response rate was 6%, 1-year survival rate was 28%, and the toxicities of therapy were mild. Pemetrexed is synergistic with gemcitabine in vitro. In a phase I trial, the pemetrexed/gemcitabine combination was broadly active and well tolerated. A phase II trial of this combination in 42 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed promising activity. A 520-patient international randomized phase III trial that compares the pemetrexed/gemcitabine combination with single-agent gemcitabine is currently accruing patients.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

Potential and toxicity of intravesical pemetrexed: a preclinical study in pigs.

PURPOSE: In search for a new drug for intravesical use in superficial urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder, a pig model is used for pharmacokinetics and toxicity measurements after intravesically administered pemetrexed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the dose escalation phase, two groups of two pigs received 5 and 10 mg/kg pemetrexed intravesically; four groups of three pigs received 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg/kg, respectively. The well-being of the animals was monitored. Blood was studied for pharmacokinetic analysis and signs of myelosuppression. Posttreatment urine samples were collected to measure the concentration of pemetrexed after instillation. Twenty-four hours posttreatment, the animals were cystectomized and sacrificed. Histopathologic examination of the bladder wall was done. In the second study phase, five pigs were instilled weekly with the maximum tested dose for 6 weeks. The same methods were applied. RESULTS: All doses (5-30 mg/kg) in the first study phase were well tolerated, enabling the use of 30 mg/kg in the second study phase. In both study phases, the pigs' well-being was not influenced. Full blood counts showed no sign of myelosuppression. Systemic absorption was not observed. Urine pemetrexed concentrations remained almost unchanged. Histopathologic examination of the bladder wall did not reveal significant abnormalities. Bladder mucosa remained intact at any time, without hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesically administered pemetrexed in pigs is well tolerated, not absorbed systemically, and causes no bladder wall toxicity.

Administration, Intravesical↗

Randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed combined with either cisplatin or carboplatin in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Given the activity and tolerability of pemetrexed/platinum combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer, and the success of novel therapeutic strategies employed in recent extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) trials, a randomized phase II trial was initiated to evaluate the use of cisplatin or carboplatin plus pemetrexed in previously untreated ES-SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or pemetrexed plus carboplatin area under the concentration curve 5. Treatment was administered once every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis. RESULTS: Between December 19, 2002, and May 17, 2004, 78 patients were enrolled onto this multicenter trial. Median age was 63 years (range, 46 to 82 years) for cisplatin/pemetrexed and 66 years (range, 47 to 75 years) for carboplatin/pemetrexed. Median survival time (MST) for cisplatin/pemetrexed was 7.6 months, with a 1-year survivorship of 33.4% and a response rate of 35% (95% CI, 20.6% to 51.7%). The MST for carboplatin/pemetrexed was 10.4 months, with a 1-year survivorship of 39.0% and a response rate of 39.5% (95% CI, 24.0 to 56.6). Median time to progression for cisplatin/pemetrexed was 4.9 months and for carboplatin/pemetrexed was 4.5 months. Median dose-intensity (actual/planned dose) was 98.94% for cisplatin and 99.95% for pemetrexed in the cisplatin/pemetrexed group and 93.21% for carboplatin and 98.50% for pemetrexed in the carboplatin/pemetrexed group. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (15.8% v 20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (13.2% v 22.9%) in the cisplatin/pemetrexed and carboplatin/pemetrexed treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed/platinum doublets had activity and appeared to be well-tolerated in first-line ES-SCLC.

Aged↗

Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pemetrexed.

Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeted antifolate that inhibits > or = 3 enzymes involved in folate metabolism and purine and pyrimidine synthesis. These enzymes are thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. This agent has broad antitumor activity in phase II trials in a wide variety of solid tumors, and is approved in combination with cisplatin for the therapy of malignant mesothelioma. In a recent phase III trial, pemetrexed demonstrated equivalent efficacy to docetaxel, but with significantly less toxicity, in second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common and serious toxicities of pemetrexed--myelosuppression and mucositis--have been significantly ameliorated by folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. More important, vitamin supplementation has not been shown to adversely affect efficacy in some tumor types. Tumors with codeletion of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase gene, as a consequence of p16 deletions, may be particularly sensitive to pemetrexed. In this review, the biochemistry and mechanism of action of pemetrexed are discussed.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Pemetrexed disodium (Eli Lilly).

Pemetrexed, a thymidylate synthase (TS) and transferase inhibitor, is in phase III trials with Eli Lilly as a potential treatment for several common solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma [321789], [410731]. Studies on pemetrexed have concluded that not only is the compound a TS inhibitor but also a potent inhibitor of human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). The results suggest that pemetrexed acts upon multiple intracellular targets and that the antitumor effect may be derived from its simultaneous inhibition of multiple folate-requiring enzymes [203662]: this compound has been designated as a multitargeted antifolate (MTA) [386680]. The drug also causes concentration- and time-dependent apoptosis [284380]. Other studies in which the 4-oxo group of the pyrimidine ring portion of pemetrexed was replaced with a hydrogen atom, demonstrated that the resulting analogs were potent DHFR inhibitors with very little activity against the enzymes glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT) and TS [310674]. In phase II European studies in 64 patients with advanced breast cancer, encouraging responses were seen in anthracycline-failure (23%) and anthracycline-refractory (19%) patients. Responses were observed in 28% of patients who had been previously treated with a taxane [326097]. Data from a phase II trial of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 once every 21 days as a 10 min i.v. infusion) as a salvage therapy in advanced breast cancer showed that supplementation of the treatment regime with folic acid (FA) and vitamin B12 reduced its already manageable and tolerable toxicities [408821], [409650]. At doses of 500 mg/m2, the drug was also safely administered to 35 patients with impaired renal function [409953]. Phase I and II trials have shown that the main side effects include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, nausea and vomiting [203666], [272241]. Princeton University holds the patent rights to this drug under EP-00432677. In June 2001, Lilly expected to launch the product in 2003 [412318]. In February 1999, Lehman Brothers predicted launch of the drug in 2001 [319225]. In February 1999, Deutsche Bank predicted sales of $100 million in 2001 rising to $400 million in 2003 [316821]. In November 1999, Lehman Brothers estimated peak revenues in excess of $1 billion [348368]. By September 2001, Bear Stearns & Co predicted sales of $35 million in 2002, rising to $125 million in 2005 [422325].

Animals↗

Homocysteine and methylmalonic acid: markers to predict and avoid toxicity from pemetrexed therapy.

The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors for severe toxicity caused by antifolate-chemotherapy using pemetrexed (ALIMTA, LY231514), as a model. Data on potential predictive factors for severe toxicity from pemetrexed were collected from 246 patients treated between 1995 and 1999. Multivariate stepwise regression methods were used to identify markers predictive of severe toxicity. Using a multiple logistic regression model allowed us to quantify the relative risk of developing toxicities and to generate a validated clinical hypothesis on ways to improve the safety profile of pemetrexed. Pretreatment total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) levels significantly predict severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia with or without associated grade 3/4 diarrhea, mucositis, or infection. Pretreatment methylmalonic acid (MMA) levels significantly and independently predict grade 3/4 diarrhea and mucositis; however, these toxicities are still predicted by tHcy alone. Patients with elevated baseline levels of tHcy alone, or of both tHcy and MMA, were found to have a high risk of severe toxicity that led us to postulate that reducing tHcy would result in a reduction of severe toxicity with no harm to efficacy. This study points out for the first time the importance of pretreatment tHcy levels in predicting severe toxicity associated with an antifolate and sets the stage for a prospective clinical intervention to protect patients from pemetrexed-induced severe toxicity and possibly improve the drug's efficacy. Antifolates as a class have been associated with sporadic severe myelosuppression with gastrointestinal toxicity. Although infrequent, a combination of such toxicities can carry a high risk of mortality. This phenomenon had been unpredictable until now. Our work shows that by measuring tHcy, one can identify patients that are at risk of toxicity before treatment. Most importantly, decreasing homocysteine levels via vitamin supplementation leads to a better safety profile of pemetrexed and possibly to an improved efficacy.

Adult↗

New investigative regimens and cytotoxic agents in thoracic cancers: gemcitabine and pemetrexed.

Several new antimetabolites, administered alone or in combination, are changing the therapeutic landscape for thoracic cancer. Two-drug combinations involving these newer drugs are becoming the standard of care for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), largely due to improvements in survival rates, time to disease progression, and response rates as well as an improved safety profile. Gemcitabine (Gemzar) has elicited considerable interest in this disease, as a combination partner in chemotherapeutic regimens. Another promising agent is pemetrexed (Alimta), a folate-based inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. In preclinical development, pemetrexed both alone and in combination with other cytotoxic agents has exhibited activity across a broad range of tumor models, including NSCLC and mesothelioma. In clinical trials of patients with NSCLC, pemetrexed has been an effective, well-tolerated agent that can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other agents at full dose. In clinical trials of patients with mesothelioma, the combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin demonstrated a significant improvement in survival, response, and patient quality-of-life parameters. The principle toxicities of pemetrexed can be minimized by folate and vitamin B12 supplements.

Aged↗

Pemetrexed in second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

According to the updated 2004 guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) on the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), docetaxel (Taxotere) can be considered the standard second-line chemotherapy in patients relapsing after frontline therapy. This was based on two phase III trials (TAX 317 and TAX 320) that demonstrated the superiority of docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 in the parameters of survival, quality of life, and disease/symptom control when compared to best supportive care or alternative single-agent chemotherapy. The response rate was approximately 60%, with a median survival time of 7 months and a 1-year survival rate of 30%. Despite the activity demonstrated, this schedule showed an important toxicity profile, with grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurring in 70% and 11% of patients, respectively. However, the results obtained by these studies stimulated research interest in new drugs for this disease setting. Pemetrexed (Alimta), a new multitargeted antifolate, has achieved promising results in NSCLC treatment, as a single agent or in combination with other drugs. In the second-line setting, a large phase II study demonstrated good activity of pemetrexed, with an acceptable toxicity profile. This led to a phase III registration trial that compared pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 to the standard docetaxel dose of 75 mg/m2. While results from this trial demonstrated a similar efficacy of the two regimens in response rate and survival, pemetrexed achieved a better safety profile. These results support the use of pemetrexed as a new option in the second-line treatment of NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Current data with pemetrexed (Alimta) in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pemetrexed (Alimta ) is a novel multitargeted antifolate that inhibits 3 enzymes involved in folate metabolism and purine and pyrimidine synthesis. These enzymes are thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. This agent has broad antitumor activity in phase II trials in a wide variety of solid tumors. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), single-agent activity has been documented in the first- and second-line settings. Promising activity has also been demonstrated when pemetrexed is combined with cisplatin and gemcitabine. A pivotal phase III study in mesothelioma has been presented, indicating the superiority of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in this disease. Approval for pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin in advanced mesothelioma is expected within the next 12 months. This review discusses the activity of pemetrexed in NSCLC.

Journal Article↗

Review of a promising new agent--pemetrexed disodium.

Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTa, [pemetrexed], LY231514; Eli Lilly and Company; Indianapolis, IN), a novel antifolate antimetabolite with multiple enzyme targets involved in both pyrimidine and purine synthesis, has entered clinical trials due to its favorable pleclinical profile. Many studies utilizing the drug, as a single or combination agent, are currently ongoing, including Phase III trials in mesothelioma, nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and pancreatic cancer. Promising feasibility and activity data have been obtained with pemetrexed in combination with platinum compounds and gemcitabine. The supplementation with daily oral folate could reduce the incidence of hematologic toxicities while preserving the antitumor activity of pemetrexed.

Animals↗

Population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA) in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium in cancer patients enrolled in four different open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized phase II studies. METHODS: Pemetrexed disodium was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (600 mg/m2) every 21 days. A total of four blood samples were to be collected each cycle per patient (n= 103 patients) during cycles 1 and 3. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling using NONMEM to estimate pemetrexed disodium pharmacokinetic parameters (mean, and between- and within-patient variability) as well as relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and various patient-specific factors (demographic and physiologic data). RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium were best characterized by a two-compartment model with initial distribution and terminal elimination half-lives of 0.63 h and 2.73 h, respectively. The typical value of systemic clearance (CL) in liters per hour included a relationship to creatinine clearance (CrCL) with a slope of 0.0292. Typical values of central volume (V(c)), distributional CL (Q), and peripheral volume (V(p)) were 11.3 1, 3.21 l/h, and 5.20 l, respectively. Between-patient variability was 19.6%, 15.6%, and 21.7% for CL, V(c), and V(p), respectively. A combined additive/proportional error model was used to describe residual variability, with a coefficient of variation of 23.7% for the proportional component and a standard deviation of 0.0410 microg/ml for the additive component. Significant patient-specific factors on CL were calculated CrCL, body weight, and to a lesser extent alanine transaminase and folate deficiency. Gender and body weight were significant factors on V(c) while both body surface area and albumin were significant factors on V(p). In conclusion, population pharmacokinetic modeling revealed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and various patient specific factors.

Adult↗

Triple combination of irradiation, chemotherapy (pemetrexed), and VEGFR inhibition (SU5416) in human endothelial and tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This is the first preclinical report evaluating a trimodal therapy consisting of irradiation, chemotherapy, and antiangiogenesis in the context of a multimodal anticancer strategy. The combination of the folate antimetabolite pemetrexed, SU5416, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR2, and irradiation was investigated in human endothelial cells and tumor cell lines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Primary isolated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC), and human glioblastoma (U87) and prostate cancer cells (PC3) were exposed to pemetrexed (2 h) alone and in combination with SU5416 (2 h). When combined with irradiation up to 8 Gy, fixed concentrations of pemetrexed (1.06 muM) and SU5416 (1.0 muM) were used. Proliferation and clonogenic assays were conducted with endothelial and tumor cells. The migration/invasion ability of endothelial cells and the ability to produce tubular structures were tested in Matrigel and tube formation assays. Apoptosis was measured by sub-G1 DNA and caspase-3 flow cytometry. To investigate underlying cell signaling, immunocytochemistry was used to detect Akt survival signaling involvement. RESULTS: Triple combination using only a low-toxicity drug exposure of pemetrexed and SU5416 results in greater response than each treatment alone or than each combination of two modalities in all tested endothelial and tumor cell models. Triple combination substantially inhibits proliferation, migration/invasion, tube formation, and clonogenic survival. Triple combination also induced the highest rate of apoptosis in HDMEC and HUVEC as indicated by sub-1 G1 and caspase-3 assessment. Interestingly, triple combination therapy also reduces proliferation and clonogenic survival significantly in U87 and PC3 tumor cell lines. SU5416 potently inhibited Akt phosphorylation which could be induced by radiation and radiochemotherapy in human endothelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the high antiendothelial/antitumoral efficacy of the concurrent administration of irradiation, chemotherapy, and angiogenesis inhibition in vitro. A potential explanation for the favorable combination would be that VEGF signaling inhibition downregulates Akt survival signaling upon activation by radiation and/or chemotherapy. The data also suggest that endothelial cell apoptosis may have an important role in the benefits of the presented therapy.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗

Pemetrexed-associated urticarial vasculitis.

Pemetrexed (Alimta, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) is a structurally novel anti-folate agent. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved pemetrexed for the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. In the phase III trials that led to its approval, rash was reported in 17 and 22% of patients receiving pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin. However, little has been published about the characteristics of this rash or about its mechanism. In an attempt to contribute to the growing body of knowledge about this new agent, we describe a case in which a patient developed a rash secondary to urticarial vasculitis associated with pemetrexed.

Aged↗

Administration of pemetrexed immediately following gemcitabine as front-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed and gemcitabine have demonstrated independent anti-tumor activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of these two therapies may produce synergistic anti-tumor effects. Previous studies of this combination have included a 90-min separation between the two drugs. More recent preclinical studies have suggested that this delay in administration might be unnecessary. This phase II study was designed to determine the objective tumor response rate and toxicity when pemetrexed was administered immediately after gemcitabine on day 1. METHODS: Chemonaïve patients stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC were enrolled. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (10-min i.v. infusion, immediately following gemcitabine, on day 1) every 21 days. All patients received folic acid, vitamin B12, and steroid prophylaxis. RESULTS: The 53 enrolled patients completed a total of 199 cycles (median=4.0, mean=3.8). Best tumor response consisted of 1 complete response (2.0%), 15 partial responses (30.6%), 17 with stable disease (34.7%), and 16 with progressive disease (32.7%). Median time to disease progression was 3.3 months and median survival was 10.3 months. Grades 3/4 hematologic toxicities (% patients) consisted of: neutropenia (43.4), anemia (9.4), febrile neutropenia (7.5%) and thrombocytopenia (1.9). The most common grades 3 or 4 non-hematologic events were: dyspnea (15.1), fatigue (11.3), and pyrexia (9.4). One patient (1.9%) experienced grade 2 alopecia. CONCLUSION: This schedule of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine is tolerable and offered the advantage of not requiring a 90-min delay between the two drugs. Response rate, survival, time to disease progression, and toxicity were acceptable and similar to other NSCLC regimens.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Unsuccessful rechallenge with pemetrexed after a previous radiation recall dermatitis.

Radiation recall dermatitis is characterized by an inflammatory reaction within a previously irradiated volume after administration of a drug. Antineoplastic drugs have mainly been involved in radiation recall reactions. This phenomenon is well known but poorly understood. Many hypotheses as stem-cell depletion in the radiotherapy field, heritable mutations within surviving stem cells, local vascular changes as well as a drug hypersensitivity reaction have been proposed to explain these reactions. In this report, we describe a non-small cell lung cancer patient treated with a carboplatin plus gemcitabine combination chemotherapy as first line followed by pemetrexed as second line therapy. Twenty-five years ago, she completed radiation therapy for breast cancer. Three days after the first cycle of pemetrexed, she presented with a radiation recall dermatitis. As EGFR-staining was negative, we rechallenged the patient with pemetrexed. Unfortunately, although less intense, we faced a recurrence of the skin reaction and pemetrexed was no longer continued.

Aged↗