Transference interpretations, patients' gender, and dropout rates.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Conventional antipsychotic medications are associated with elevated prolactin levels, resulting in hyperprolactinemia and a number of unwanted side effects. Several atypical antipsychotics, on the other hand, are less likely to evoke hyperprolactinemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia induced by conventional antipsychotic drugs, examine changes in serum prolactin levels and psychiatric symptoms after switching to quetiapine, and identify the relevant characteristics of patients who may be suitable to switch to quetiapine. METHOD: Sixty-nine of 74 consecutive female patients who had received conventional antipsychotic drugs were initially included in the study. Of these, 49 (71 %) patients suffered from hyperprolactinemia, of which a further 25 were subsequently switched to quetiapine. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and serum prolactin levels were measured just before and at 4 and 8 weeks after switching. RESULTS: Eight of the 25 (32 %) "switch" patients dropped out due to psychotic exacerbation during the 8 weeks. In the remaining 17 (68 %) patients, serum prolactin levels were significantly decreased without any significant change in PANSS scores after switching. The 17 patients who completed the switch had previously demonstrated significantly lower positive symptom scores compared to the 8 dropout patients. CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that 71 % of female patients receiving conventional antipsychotic drugs may suffer from hyperprolactinemia and that approximately two-thirds of patients can be switched to quetiapine, resulting in an improvement in hyperprolactinemia. The main characteristic of the switched patients may be fewer positive symptoms.
This expert review of results from the leflunomide phase II and III clinical trials database demonstrates that leflunomide meets all 3 goals desired of disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy: reducing the signs and symptoms of the disease; inhibiting structural damage; and improving physical function. Further, leflunomide has a rapid onset of action, sustained efficacy, and is effective in early and late disease, regardless of whether patients have received other DMARD previously. The consistent efficacy of leflunomide across phase III clinical trials is confirmed by the findings from clinical practice. Experts agreed that it is important to observe a patient under leflunomide monotherapy for at least 3-4 months before assessing efficacy. It is possible to start maintenance therapy, with either a daily dose of leflunomide 10 mg, subsequently changing to 20 mg, or the reverse. The decision to use a loading dose when initiating leflunomide therapy depends primarily on the balance between the tolerability and rapid efficacy associated with a loading dose, and the balance desired for an individual patient. In general, the use of both maintenance and loading doses requires a flexible approach to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. During the first few weeks of leflunomide therapy, patient dropout can be avoided by using prednisolone rather than a loading dose. Moreover, to ensure good tolerability and compliance in patients receiving a loading dose, information and adequate support should be provided throughout treatment.
Serum prostaglandin F2 (PGF2) was assayed in 27 alcoholic patients and in 18 control subjects. No significant difference was observed in mean basal PGF2 titers of patients and controls. However, patients who completed four months of alcoholism treatment had a mean titer that was significantly higher than that of treatment dropouts. Patients who maintained continuous abstinence for 2 years following treatment had a mean titer that was significantly higher than that of patients who returned to pre-treatment drinking levels.
BACKGROUND: Weight loss predicts a poor prognosis for cancer patients, and previous studies have implicated the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as a major mediator of cancer-associated weight loss. The recent emergence of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, now allows testing on whether proteasome inhibition is effective therapy for cancer-associated weight loss. METHODS: This study represents a subanalysis from two prior antineoplastic trials in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The first included 46 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with single-agent bortezomib (intravenous doses of 1.5 or 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle). The second included 42 patients with pancreatic cancer treated with single-agent octreotide (200 or 500 microg subcutaneously three times a day). The FACT-C questionnaire provided appetite and related data for bortezomib-treated patients. Serial weight data were available from both trials. Such data from the octreotide trial were utilized for comparative purposes because the latter holds no track record in treating cancer-associated weight loss. RESULTS: Bortezomib- and octreotide-treated patients were roughly comparable at baseline, and neither agent demonstrated notable antineoplastic effects. FACT-C data suggested stable appetite, but high patient dropout rates invite caution in interpretation. For example, in response to "I have a good appetite," mean scores for bortezomib-treated patients were 45 at baseline (n=42), 45 at the end of cycle 1 (n=26), and 44 at the end of cycle 2 (n=9). In contrast, weight data appeared more straightforward to interpret: direct comparisons of mean change in weight from baseline between bortezomib- and octreotide-treated patients showed no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that bortezomib shows negligible favorable effects on cancer-associated weight loss in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We conclude that further study of bortezomib specifically in this setting and for this indication is not warranted.
Data from clinical trials reviewed in this article fulfill predictions based on preclinical findings that atypical antipsychotic drugs are associated with a reduced potential for inducing extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and other movement disorders. Atypical drugs have been shown to reduce all subtypes of acute EPS, the frequency of EPS-related patient dropouts, and the need for concomitant antiparkinsonian drug use. Clozapine remains superior to other atypicals in treating psychosis without worsening motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. Atypicals may be selectively advantageous in treating schizophrenic patients with a predisposition to catatonia. Although the risk of developing lethal neuroleptic malignant syndrome may be diminished with atypical drugs, clinicians must remain alert to the signs of this disorder. Atypicals have reduced liability for inducing tardive dyskinesia (TD) and show antidyskinetic properties in patients with preexisting TD. Passive resolution of TD may be facilitated in some patients by the use of these agents. Thus, the risk of movement disorders has become only one of several considerations in choosing among antipsychotic drugs.
BACKGROUND: The new aqueous formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) was compared with loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of TAA aqueous with loratadine in relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: A total of 351 patients were enrolled into this 4-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel group study. Patients received either TAA aqueous nasal spray (220 microg) or loratadine (10 mg) once daily. Efficacy variables were rhinitis symptom changes from baseline, physician global evaluations, and the patient dropout rate due to insufficient treatment effect. Safety and quality of life also was evaluated. RESULTS: Both TAA aqueous-treated and loratadine-treated patients had improvement in symptoms as early as day 1. Overall, TAA aqueous was significantly (P < .05) more effective than loratadine in reducing total nasal symptoms and individual symptoms of nasal congestion, nasal itch, and sneezing. Ocular symptoms improved from baseline in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups based on physician global evaluation. A similar number of patients in each group discontinued the study due to ineffective treatment. Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous patients maintained a significantly (P < .05) better quality of life in three of the dimensions (activity, nasal symptoms, and practical problems) and for overall quality of life. There were no differences between the two treatment groups in the incidence of adverse events, none of which were clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Both TAA aqueous and loratadine were effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous was significantly (P < .05) more effective than loratadine in controlling nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and maintaining a better quality of life for the patients.
AIMS: There are no data comparing the relative efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) on airway hyper-responsiveness, in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. We therefore elected to evaluate the comparative efficacy of HFA pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulations of CIC and FP, assessing methacholine challenge, in addition to exhaled nitric oxide, lung function, diary cards and quality of life. METHODS: Nineteen mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients completed the study per protocol in randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Patients were required to stop their usual inhaled corticosteroid therapy for the duration of the study. Patients were commenced instead on salmeterol (SM) 50 microg one puff twice daily + montelukast (ML) 10 mg once daily for 2-week washout periods prior to each randomized treatment, in order to prevent dropouts. Patients received 4 weeks of either CIC 200 microg two puffs once daily (08.00 h) + CIC-placebo (PL) two puffs once daily (20.00 h) + FP-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h), or FP 125 microg two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h) + CIC-PL two puffs twice daily (08.00 h and 20.00 h). SM + ML were withheld for 72 h prior to post-washout visits and CIC or FP was withheld for 24 h prior to study visits. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between CIC vs. FP for the primary outcome of methacholine PC20 as doubling dilution (dd) shift from respective baseline; mean difference: 0.4 dd (95% CI -0.4, 1.2). Moreover, there was no difference between treatments for the sequence of CIC first vs FP second; mean difference: 0.2 dd (95% CI -1.3, 1.7) or FP first vs CIC second; mean difference: 0.9 dd (95% CI -0.1, 1.8). There were also no differences for other secondary outcomes between treatments, either respective or irrespective of sequence, as change from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences between 4 weeks of CIC 400 microg once daily and FP 250 microg twice daily on methacholine hyper-responsiveness in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Longer-term studies are indicated to evaluate their relative efficacy on asthma exacerbations.
The present investigation was undertaken to explore changes over time in the design and reporting of trials of second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis, in the characteristics of patients included in the trials, and in the sources of funding. We studied 105 trials of second-line agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, including placebo-controlled and comparative trials involving 8 different agents. Three time periods, 1945-1969, 1970-1979, and 1980-1989, were compared. We found little change in the standards for reporting on the design of trials or for reporting information on patient dropout and drug side effects, some increase in the complexity of the statistical methods used, but no increase in the use of power analysis (reported in only 13% of trials). The average age of patients in clinical trials has increased. In recent years, there has been a substantial shift from placebo-controlled to comparative trials, and it is increasingly common for trials to be financially supported by pharmaceutical companies. The possible effects of secular trends should be considered when combining or comparing results of trials conducted in different years.
We studied measures for the prevention and treatment of chronic positive-sputum tuberculosis. Most physicians treating chronic intractable pulmonary tuberculosis are concerned about treatment and control measures. However, both the medical and social aspects of the disease must be dealt with. The study of the medical aspects of tuberculosis used data on patients at the Tokyo National Chest Hospital and other sanitoria in Japan. The socioeconomic study employed data from a health center in Tokyo. Recently, new cases of tuberculosis are concentrated in socioeconomically high risk groups, such as the homeless and illegal aliens, in a few large cities. Patients in these groups often have multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB), including many patients with relapsing tuberculosis. However, it is dificult to keep such patients under treatment because of poor compliance and patient dropout. The results of our study are summarized as follows: 1. Prevention and treatment of chronic intractable tuberculosis should involve both the medical and socioeconomic aspects of the disease. 2. Surgical treatment offers benefits for patients with chronically positive sputum. Therefore, surgery should be recommended to patients with chronic intractable MDRTB. 3. If resistance to both isoniazid and rifampin is demonstrated, it is better to replace all ineffective drugs with a new effective regimen than to add a single drug to a failing regimen.
Depression occurs in about 15% of the general population and is at least two to three times more common in patients with cancer. Depression is often difficult to diagnose in these patients because of the complexity and constraints of cancer care, patient and family reluctance to acknowledge distress, and the presence of multiple other symptoms. Both antidepressants and psychotherapy are effective in treating depression in patients with cancer, much like in patients with other significant medical problems. Precise assessments of the benefits of treating depression in these patients are important in weighing them against the costs and potential adverse effects. Such estimates are limited by a paucity of randomized, placebo-controlled trials and methodological problems in the existing studies that reflect some of the clinical difficulties in case-finding, treatment, and follow-up of patients with cancer. The existing body of research about depression in cancer patients is extremely limited in terms of the number of studies published and the number of total patients reported over the last 30 years. Moreover, these limited data may not generalize well because of high rates of patient dropout and the very limited enrollment of children, adolescents, older adults, and minority groups. There is an emerging trend toward simplifying the assessment of depression in outpatient cancer care settings and studying depression therapies in cohorts of patients with cancer other than those with fully characterized depressive disorders.
BACKGROUND: Recent randomised studies reported that single fraction radiotherapy was as effective as multifraction radiotherapy in relieving pain due to bone metastasis. However, there are concerns about the higher re-treatment rates and the efficacy of preventing future complications such as pathological fracture and spinal cord compression by single fraction radiotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of single fraction radiotherapy versus multifraction radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain relief and prevention of bone complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings. Relevant data was extracted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised studies comparing single fraction radiotherapy with multifraction radiotherapy on metastatic bone pain DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The analyses were performed using intention-to-treat principle. The results were pooled using meta-analysis to estimate the effect of treatment on pain response, re-treatment rate, pathological fracture rate and spinal cord compression rate. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials that involved 3435 patients were identified. Of 3435 patients, 52 patients were randomised more than once for different painful bone metastasis sites. Altogether, 3487 painful sites were randomised. The trials included patients with painful bone metastases of any primary sites, but were mainly prostate, breast and lung. The overall pain response rates for single fraction radiotherapy and multifraction radiotherapy were 60% (1059/1779) and 59% (1038/1769) respectively, giving an odds ratio of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 - 1.19) indicating no difference between the two radiotherapy schedules. There was also no difference in complete pain response rates for single fraction radiotherapy (34% [497/1441]) and multifraction radiotherapy (32% [463/1435]) with an odds ratio of 1.11 (95%CI 0.94-1.30). Patients treated by single fraction radiotherapy had a higher re-treatment rate with 21.5% (267/1240) requiring re-treatment compared to 7.4% (91/1236) of patients in the multifraction radiotherapy arm (odds ratio 3.44 [95%CI 2.67-4.43]). The pathological fracture rate was also higher in single fraction radiotherapy arm patients. Three percent (37/1240) of patients treated by single fraction radiotherapy developed pathological fracture compared to 1.6% (20/1236) for those treated by multifraction radiotherapy (odds ratio 1.82 [95%CI 1.06-3.11]). The spinal cord compression rates were similar for both arms (odds ratio 1.41 [95%CI 0.72-2.75]). Repeated analyses excluding dropout patients gave similar results. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Single fraction radiotherapy was as effective as multifraction radiotherapy in relieving metastatic bone pain. However, the re-treatment rate and pathological fracture rates were higher after single fraction radiotherapy. Studies with quality of life and health economic end points are warranted to find out the optimal treatment option.
Eight-seven moderately to severely depressed psychiatric outpatients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of cognitive therapy (CT) (n = 24), pharmacotherapy (n = 24), CT plus pharmacotherapy (n = 22), or CT plus active placebo (n = 17). Seventy patients completed the treatment protocol. Seventeen dropped out before the end of the treatment period. Patients who completed treatment showed significant improvement in mean scores on two common measures of severity of depression (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) between evaluation and termination. Improvement did not differ as a function of the different treatment modalities. Inclusion of dropout patients' end-point scores did not alter these results. Treatment gains in all groups were maintained at one-month follow-up assessment. A portion of this study replicated an earlier study. While the results were not identical, they indicated that either CT or antidepressant drug treatment can be effective in treating outpatients with primary, nonbipolar depression of moderate or greater severity. Combining treatments did not lead either to additive effects or negative interactions.
The long-term dropout rate was examined in a physical exercise rehabilitation program in which 203 cardiac patients were followed for 40 months. The dropout curve was found to be downward-sloping and negatively accelerated with most of the dropouts occurring during the first 3 months. This dropout rate appeared to resemble the group release curve previously found in the treatment of addictive behaviors. Implications of the present findings are discussed in terms of the development of strategies to facilitate long-term compliance.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Narrative reviews represent a popular source of information for clinicians, especially where the evidence on a given subject is sparse and analogies from other fields of medicine may help in filling the information gap. Unfortunately, narrative reviews often follow less stringent criteria for information selection and appraisal than systematic reviews, potentially leading to incomplete or biased recommendations. The objective of the present study was to examine the quality of the recommendations provided by narrative reviews on how to improve patient adherence to pharmacological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders. METHOD: We sought to locate all narrative review papers addressing adherence to treatment in unipolar depressive disorders. In order to do so, we searched Medline and PsychInfo from 1980 to December 2003, using the following keywords: review, depressive disorders, treatment, dropout, patient compliance and adherence. We inspected the title and the abstract, whenever available to identify the relevant reviews and obtained a full copy of the publications in this subset, and read the articles to identify further relevant reviews. These were in turn copied and reviewed, until no further references were found. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We identified 23 reviews, providing a total of 87 recommendations. The most common recommendation was for patient education (19 times), patient-physician empathy/alliance (14 times), and education of family (nine times). Reviewers' recommendations were based on the literature on depression 54 times, and on other medical conditions 17 times. A critical appraisal of the evidence base of the recommendations showed that randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses were quoted to support the recommendations only 23% of the times, while important interventions of proven efficacy in the field of depression or in other chronic conditions (e.g. medication clinics, training of nurses, psychological treatment, and telephone follow-up) were not mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Narrative reviews on adherence to pharmacological treatment of depressive disorders suffer not only from the limited availability of good quality evidence, but also from an incomplete critical appraisal of available evidence on interventions both for depression and for other chronic disorders.
Over the last decade, our clinical research team has evolved effective methods for forming a strong treatment alliance with mood disorder patients. These methods, in turn, have been associated with very low rates of patient dropout (< 10%) and high rates of objectively measured medication compliance (> 85%) over multiyear treatment trials. We have every reason to believe that our technique for alliance building would be equally effective in general clinical practice. The cornerstones of our methods are education of, information for, and active participation by the patient in the treatment process. We begin by educating the patient about his or her disorder and its treatment, giving patients as much information as their clinical condition will allow them to absorb. As patients begin to improve, we provide additional information. We continuously inform patients about what to expect in treatment and when, both with respect to amelioration of symptoms and with respect to the medication side effects they may experience. We present the treatment experience as an experiment in which clinician and patient are coinvestigators, each with his or her own expertise. The clinician is the expert on the disorder and its treatment in general; the patient is the expert on his or her own disorder and his or her own experience of the treatment. We try to keep the experiment interesting and, whenever possible, to inject some humor into it. We work to engage family members as adjunct members of the experimental team by educating them as well and keeping them informed throughout the treatment process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
In a 12-months double-blind study 42 obese patients (5 males, 37 females) were treated either with d-fenfluramine (30 mg daily) or with placebo plus low-calorie diet (1500-1200 kcal daily). Evaluation of treatment efficacy was based on evolution of the initial cohort, weight loss, number of subjects completing treatment, tolerability and events leading to dropout. Patients receiving d-fenfluramine had statistically significant greater weight loss than the placebo group; 30 mg daily proved to be an effective and well tolerated dose of d-fenfluramine with the best long-term activity/acceptability ratio.
In 1988 the American Fertility Society revised its guidelines for the use of semen in donor insemination by stating that "the use of fresh semen for donor insemination is no longer warranted." Although the consequences of this recommendation include an approximate doubling of the patient's cost of treatment, a 50% reduction in both cycle fecundity and 3-month life-table pregnancy rates, a reduction in the number of pregnancies because of patient dropout, and an ethically troubling increase in physician income as a direct result of the diminished efficacy of treatment, an analysis of the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus through donor insemination has not been presented. All available data suggest that neither safety nor efficacy need be sacrificed in the current practice of donor insemination by offering patients the choice of appropriately screened fresh or frozen sperm.