Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pathologic complete response - pCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Preoperative 5-FU, low-dose leucovorin, and radiation therapy for locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We report the local control and survival of two Phase I dose escalation trials of combined preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), low-dose leucovorin (LV), and radiation therapy followed by postoperative LV/5-FU for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 36 patients (30 primary and 6 recurrent) received two monthly cycles of LV/5-FU (bolus daily x 5). Radiation therapy (50.40 Gy) began on day 1 in the 25 patients who received concurrent treatment and on day 8 in the 11 patients who received sequential treatment. Postoperatively, patients received a median of four monthly cycles of LV/5-FU. RESULTS: The resectability rate with negative margins was 97%. The complete response rate was 11% pathologic and 14% clinical for a total of 25%. The 4-year actuarial disease-free survival was 67% and the overall survival was 76%. The crude local failure rate was 14% and the 4-year actuarial local failure rate was 30%. Crude local failure was lower in the four patients who had a pathologic complete response (0%) compared with those who either did not have a pathologic complete response (16%) or who had a clinical complete response (20%). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data with the low-dose LV regimen reveal encouraging downstaging, local control, and survival rates. Additional follow-up is needed to determine the 5-year results. The benefit of downstaging on local control is greatest in patients who achieve a pathologic complete response.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Primary docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: impact on response and survival.

Primary chemotherapy achieves high clinical response rates and facilitates breast conservation in many patients with large and locally advanced breast cancer. It may also serve to indicate responsiveness to chemotherapeutic agents. A pathological complete response to primary chemotherapy is a primary predictor and surrogate marker of long-term outcome, but occurs in only approximately 15% of patients. Docetaxel is of particular interest in this setting. Primary docetaxel chemotherapy has single-agent activity in both dose-dense and traditional schedules, with acceptable tolerability. Furthermore, concomitant docetaxel-anthracycline schedules have shown promise in Phase II trials, achieving clinical overall response rates (ORRs) of 77-96%, pathological complete responses of up to 24%, and breast conservation in up to 89% of patients. Two Phase III studies have shown that pathological complete response is significantly improved with the addition of docetaxel to anthracycline-based therapy versus the latter alone: the Aberdeen study achieved a rate of 34% versus 16%, respectively (p = 0.04), and the NSABP-B27 study a rate of 26% versus 14%, respectively (p < 0.001). The Aberdeen study has suggested that the addition of docetaxel may yield a survival benefit at 5 years (p = 0.04). The Phase II GEPAR-DUO study hints at a benefit for sequential over concomitant docetaxel-based therapy, with improvements in both clinical response (ORR 87% versus 77%, respectively) and pathological complete response (23% versus 12%, respectively). Non-anthracycline docetaxel-based primary regimens have shown early promise. As we continue to define the optimal regimen, a growing body of evidence supports the use of docetaxel in primary chemotherapeutic regimens for breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2004

Twice-daily radiotherapy as concurrent boost technique during two chemotherapy cycles in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma: mature results of phase II study.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using a three-drug regimen (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel) and a conventional radiotherapy (RT) schedule combined with a concurrent boost technique during chemotherapy cycles, and to determine the rate of tumor response, overall survival, and impact of pathologic tumor response on survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The eligibility criteria included resectable adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (T2-T3N0-N1M0), performance score < or =2, and no significant comorbidities for trimodality therapy. Chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel. A concurrent boost technique was used in RT for 2 levels of radiation doses: 58.5 Gy in 34 fractions within 5 weeks to the gross tumor volume and 45 Gy in 25 fractions within 5 weeks to the clinical target volume by administering a boost dose of 13.5 Gy in 9 fractions, 1.5 Gy/fraction, as a second daily fraction for 9 days on Days 1-5 and 29-32 of the chemotherapy cycles. RESULTS: We enrolled 46 patients in the study. The paclitaxel dose was started at 75 mg/m(2) (n = 7) and escalated to 125 mg/m(2) (n = 5), at which point, dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Thereafter, paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2) was used for an additional 34 patients. Toxicities included Grade 4 neutropenia (22%), febrile neutropenia requiring hospital admission (20%), Grade 3 (48%) and Grade 4 (7%) acute esophagitis, and paclitaxel-associated anaphylaxis (4%). Of the 46 patients, 3 (6.5%) died of treatment-related complications, 1 of pneumonia during induction therapy and 2 of postoperative complications (5% of the 40 patients who underwent resection). The histopathologic tumor response was a pathologic complete response (pT0N0) in 18 (45%) of 40 patients who underwent resection and 18 (39%) of all 46 registered patients. Minimal residual disease (pT1N0) at the primary site was present in 5 (11%) and residual disease in 23 (50%) of all 46 patients. The minimal follow-up for all long-term survivors (n = 16) was 5.5 years. The median survival time was 34 months, and the overall survival rate was 57%, 50%, and 37% at 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (56% vs. 24%, p = 0.0214) and disease-free survival (48% vs. 6%) were significantly better statistically for patients with a pathologic complete response and minimal residual disease than for those with residual disease. All long-term survivors beyond 5.5 years without recurrence accrued from patient cohorts with a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease. CONCLUSION: An incorporation of twice-daily RT as a concurrent boost to the conventional daily RT schedule during chemotherapy cycles is feasible and warrants additional study for radiation dose intensification. Such research would be prudent for both improved long-term survival and organ preservation in esophageal carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Pilot evaluation of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by high-dose melphalan supported by peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel and one consolidation cycle of high-dose melphalan with all cycles supported by hematopoietic stem cells and cytokine, in previously untreated patients with optimally debulked stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients had histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer and optimal initial cytoreductive surgery. No prior chemotherapy was permitted. Adequate performance status, bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function was required. After being mobilized with cyclophosphamide 3 g/m(2), paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2), and filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected by leukapheresis. Patients received three cycles of carboplatin AUC 15 mg. min/ml iv, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and PBSC with filgrastim every 28 days, followed by one cycle of melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and hematopoietic support. RESULTS: Nine patients entered the trial and received all planned cycles of chemotherapy. Of the eight patients who consented to surgical reassessment upon completing therapy, four had residual small-volume macroscopic disease, three had microscopic residual disease, and one had pathologic complete response. The estimated probability of a pathologic complete response was 12.5% (95% confidence interval: 0.3-52.7%). Hematologic toxicity was severe but manageable. Eleven of 45 cycles (24.4%) resulted in hospital admission for neutropenic fever, dehydration +/- diarrhea, syncope, or shortness of breath and pain secondary to tense ascites. CONCLUSIONS: The low pathological complete response rate did not justify toxicity; thus, the study was closed. High-dose chemotherapy as first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer remains experimental and should be restricted to clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Combination of vinorelbine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: phase II study.

Achievement of a pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer can predict long-term outcome. We have investigated a combination of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and vinorelbine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). From January 1997 to May 1999, 30 chemonaive patients were treated (T2 or T3 histologically proven invasive breast carcinoma). Treatment was vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 day 1 and day 3, epirubicin 30 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 3, cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 3, every 14 days for 4 courses. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable. Median age: 48 years (range: 28-66 years); 26 had ductal invasive carcinoma and 4 lobular invasive carcinoma; median tumor size: 7 cm; median number of induction cycles: four. Clinical objective response was seen in 24 patients (relative risk: 86%), 14 complete responses, 10 partial responses, four stable disease (no significant changes). Twenty-nine patients had surgical treatment. Pathologic response rate was complete response in 32% (no residual tumor), in situ carcinoma: 11%, invasive or unchanged tumor remaining: 57%. Ninety-eight cycles were administered; major toxicities were hematologic: grade IV Hb in 5% and grade IV neutropenia in 60% of cycles. Ten patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. The vinorelbine/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide regimen resulted in a high pathologic complete response rate in LABC with a good tolerance profile, and warrants further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Primary chemotherapy with docetaxel for the management of breast cancer.

Several clinical trials have explored the efficacy of docetaxel (Taxotere) as primary chemotherapy for breast cancer. Docetaxel has been evaluated as single-agent therapy, sequentially as a single agent following anthracycline-containing regimens, and in combination with anthracyclines, cisplatin, and trastuzumab (Herceptin) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. Two large, randomized phase III trials have demonstrated significant improvements in clinical and pathologic response rates with the sequential addition of docetaxel to an anthracycline-containing preoperative regimen. A trial conducted in the United Kingdom demonstrated that docetaxel sequential to CVAP (cyclophosphamide [Cytoxan, Neosar], vincristine, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], prednisolone) produced a higher overall clinical response rate (94% vs 66%, P = .001) and pathologic complete response rate (34% vs 18%) compared to additional cycles of CVAP as primary chemotherapy. This translated into a survival advantage for docetaxel-treated patients, whose 3-year disease-free and overall survival were significantly improved (97% vs 84%; 90% vs 77%, P = .03). The results of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-27 demonstrated that primary doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel significantly increased the clinical complete response (65% vs 40%, P < .001) and pathologic complete response rates (25.6% vs 13.7%, P < .001) and decreased the rate of positive axillary nodes (40.5% vs 48.5%, P = .01). Final analysis of NSABP B-27 may also potentially demonstrate improved disease-free and overall survivals. Additional phase II and phase III randomized trials have compared docetaxel/anthracycline combinations with standard anthracycline-based regimens. Preliminary results have shown that incorporation of docetaxel can improve the rate of breast preservation surgery and the overall clinical and pathologic complete response rates.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients 60 years or older with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

This phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Chemonaive patients >/=60-year-old with FIGO stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg /m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg /m2 on day 1 (before cisplatin) and day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Of 44 female patients (median age, 70 years), 72.7% had stage IIIC disease and 67.4% had a Karnofsky performance status >/=80. Of the 37 response-evaluable patients (35 with measurable lesion[s] >/=2 cm), there were seven (18.9%) pathologic complete responses, two (5.4%) pathologic partial responses, two (5.4%) clinical complete responses, and 12 (32.4%) clinical partial responses, for an overall response rate of 62.2% (95% CI, 44.8%-77.5%), and a pathologic response rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8%-41.2%). Median survival was 27.7 months (95% CI, 14.3-40.8 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 59.5% and 30.2% of patients, respectively, with neutropenic fever in one patient. Grade 3 nausea /vomiting and alopecia occurred in 25.6% and 9.5% of patients, respectively. We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in patients >/=60 years. Further clinical trials adding gemcitabine to current standard, first-line treatment seem warranted in younger as well as older patients.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

A phase II trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel and capecitabine for locally advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel/capecitabine as neoadjuvant treatment for stage 2/3 breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Subjects with newly diagnosed invasive stage 2 and 3 breast cancer were eligible. The first cohort of patients was treated at dose A with neoadjuvant docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily days 2-15) for four cycles. A second cohort of subjects was treated with a reduced dose, dose B, of docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1) and capecitabine (937.5 mg/m(2) orally twice daily days 2-15). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. Eight of 10 patients treated at dose A required dose reductions of either docetaxel or capecitabine secondary to grade 3 or 4 toxicities: mucositis (1), hand-foot syndrome (3), diarrhea (2), perirectal abscess (1), and neutropenia (2). Because of a high rate of dose reductions, the next 20 patients were treated at dose B. The mean cumulative administered dose of docetaxel was 285 and 231 mg/m(2) at dose A and dose B, respectively. For capecitabine, the mean cumulative dose at dose A and B were similar at 1585 and 1627 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. The overall clinical response rate was 90% with 31% of patients having a complete response and 59% having a partial response. A pathological complete response in the breast was achieved in 10% of patients after four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel/capecitabine is a highly active regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Neoadjuvant therapy with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel and 1600 mg/m(2)/day days 2-15 is recommended.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Biomarkers of response to preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal cancers.

To identify a panel of biomarkers that predicts response of esophageal cancers to preoperative chemoradiation, our group profiled the gene expression of pretreatment cancer biopsies from patients with esophageal cancer. Six (32%) of these patients had pathologic complete response. All cancers except one that achieved pathologic complete response (83%) clustered in one molecular type (type I), while cancers that achieved less than pathologic complete response with one exception clustered in another molecular type (type II). Activated NF-kappaB was significantly associated with aggressive pathology. These data indicate that expression analysis of a limited set of biomarkers selected from the list of genes that were differentially regulated between the two subtypes can increase predictive power, and suggest that esophageal cancer with activated NF-kappaB may result in poor treatment outcome.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Dose escalation of paclitaxel with high-dose carboplatin using peripheral blood progenitor cell support in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

A phase I study of escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given in combination with high-dose carboplatin was conducted to identify the antitumor efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel in patients who had received sequential cycles of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide as prior treatment for ovarian carcinoma. Eighteen patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated in this study. Induction therapy consisted of two cycles of cyclophosphamide 3.0 g/m2 plus high-dose paclitaxel 300 mg/m2 plus filgrastim and leukapheresis to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells, followed by four courses of rapidly cycled high-dose carboplatin with planned dose escalation of paclitaxel (150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2) rescued with peripheral blood progenitor cells. The study was amended after accrual of 11 patients, and the remaining seven patients received a single cycle of induction therapy with paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide, followed by four courses of rapidly cycled high-dose carboplatin with planned dose escalation of paclitaxel through levels 200 and 250 mg/m2. All 18 patients have completed therapy. Of the 15 who are evaluable for response, the pathologic complete response was 33% (five of 15 patients). The administration of escalating doses of paclitaxel in combination with high-dose carboplatin following sequential cycles of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide induction resulted in significant nonhematopoietic toxicity. Induction with a single cycle of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide resulted in excellent progenitor cell mobilization, and significantly ameliorated the toxicity of this approach. The response rates thus far obtained are promising and warrant further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Dose-intensive induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and consolidative abdominal radiation in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this trial was to evaluate the clinical activity of a high-dose cisplatin-based induction regimen for women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. A secondary goal was to assess the use of whole-abdominal radiation as consolidative therapy in the subset of women left with less than 5 mm residual disease after completion of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage ovarian cancer received cisplatin 40 mg/m2/d and cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2/d intravenously (IV) for 5 days, every 4 to 6 weeks. After three to four cycles of chemotherapy, patients who still had residual disease less than 5 mm in greatest diameter at second-look surgery were given whole-abdominal radiotherapy. RESULTS: The overall response rate in 49 patients assessable for response was 61.3% (24.5% pathologic complete responses [pCRs], 32.7% pathologic partial responses [pPRs], and 4.1% clinical partial responses [cPRs]). Median survival for all patients was 23.4 months, and actuarial 4-year survival was 33.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8% to 48.1%). Multivariate analysis showed stage III and serous histology as independent favorable prognostic factors for survival. Median survival for stage III patients was 36.5 months, with an actuarial 4-year survival of 41.6% (95% CI, 25.5% to 59.6%). Median survival for stage IV patients was 12.0 months, with actuarial 4-year survival of 22.9% (95% CI, 9.5% to 45.5%). The major acute toxicities encountered were myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy. Patients who received consolidative radiotherapy were at increased risk of developing late-onset enteropathy. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is active against advanced-stage ovarian cancer, but the associated toxicity is severe. Consolidative whole-abdominal radiation did not appear to prolong survival in the subset of women left with less than 5 mm residual disease after chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary results of weekly loco-regional hyperthermia and cisplatin in patients with previously irradiated recurrent cervical carcinoma or locally advanced bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: The biological rationale for combining locoregional hyperthermia (HT) with cisplatin (CDDP) is the potentiating effect of HT on CDDP uptake and cytotoxicity. Feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary results of a clinical trial of weekly loco-regional HT in combination with cisplatin are described in this article. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with previously irradiated unresectable local recurrent cervical carcinoma or locally advanced bladder carcinoma were treated with weekly cycles of locoregional HT (70 MHz four antenna phased array system) for 1 h and CDDP 50 mg/m(2) IV for a maximum of 12 courses. RESULTS: Fourteen patients, 10 patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma and 4 with locally advanced bladder carcinoma, were entered in this study. A total of 100 cycles were given. Overall toxicity was acceptable; Grade 3 (WHO) toxicity (gastrointestinal, hematological, and neurotoxicity) was observed in 5 out of 14 patients. No Grade 4 toxicity was seen. Subcutaneously fatty necrosis due to HT occurred in 11% of the cycles, while two patients developed skin burns. Two out of 10 patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma were not evaluable for response. Four out of eight evaluable cervical carcinoma patients responded (two pathologic complete responses, one pathologic confirmed partial response, one partial response): response rate 50% (95% confidence interval 15.7-84.3%). Salvage surgery became possible in three out of four responding patients, whose tumors were previously considered unresectable. Two out of the four evaluable patients with locally advanced bladder carcinoma responded (two partial responses). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly loco-regional HT and CDDP 50 mg/m(2)/week for a maximum of 12 courses is feasible with an acceptable toxicity, which seems not to be enhanced by the addition of loco-regional HT. The encouraging preliminary results of this treatment schedule warrant further study, especially in patients with previously irradiated recurrent cervical carcinomas.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Feasibility and tolerability of sequential doxorubicin/paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and its effects on tumor response as preoperative therapy.

PURPOSE: The European Cooperative Trial in Operable breast cancer (ECTO) randomly tested whether efficacy of adjuvant doxorubicin followed by i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF; doxorubicin-->CMF, arm A) could be improved by adding paclitaxel (doxorubicin/paclitaxel-->CMF) as adjuvant (arm B) or primary systemic therapy (PST, arm C). We report here feasibility, tolerability, locoregional antitumor activity, and breast conservation rate. METHODS: A total of 1,355 women entered the study. Feasibility and safety were compared in arm A versus arms B plus C. Surgical findings were compared in arms A plus B versus arm C. RESULTS: Grade 3 or 4 National Cancer Institute toxicities were low (<5%) in all arms. Neuropathy was more frequent in the paclitaxel-containing arms (grade 2, 20.5% versus 5.0%; grade 3, 1.3% versus 0.2%). At 31 months of follow-up, asymptomatic drop of left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in all arms, whereas symptomatic cardiotoxicity was recorded in three patients (0.5%) in A and in three patients (0.3%) in B plus C. PST induced clinical complete plus partial remission in 78%, with an in-breast pathologic complete response rate of 23% and an in-breast plus axilla pathologic complete response rate of 20%. In the multivariate analysis, only estrogen receptor (ER) status was significantly associated with pathologic complete response (odds ratio for ER negative, 5.77; 95% confidence interval, 3.49-9.52; P<0.0001). PTS induced a significant axillary downstaging (P<0.001), and breast sparing surgery was feasible in 65% versus 34% (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin/paclitaxel-->CMF is feasible, safe, and well tolerated. Given as PST, it is markedly active, allowing for breast-sparing surgery in a large fraction of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

The effect of systemic therapy on local-regional control in locally advanced breast cancer.

One hundred and seven patients with locally advanced breast cancer were prospectively referred for multimodality treatment on protocol using chemohormonal therapy to maximal response followed by local treatment and maintenance therapy. Forty-eight patients (45%) were diagnosed with Stage IIIA disease, 46 (43%) with Stage IIIB inflammatory cancer, and 13 (12%) with Stage IIIB non-inflammatory disease. Induction therapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil with hormonal synchronization using tamoxifen and conjugated estrogens. Local treatment was determined by response to chemotherapy. Patients with a clinical parital response underwent mastectomy followed by local-regional radiotherapy while patients with a clinical complete response were biopsied for pathologic correlation. Those with residual disease received mastectomy followed by radiotherapy while those with a pathologic complete response received radiation only to the intact breast and regional nodes. With a median follow-up of 64 months, patients with IIIA disease had a significantly lower local-regional failure rate compared to IIIB inflammatory patients, with the 5-year actuarial local-regional failure rate as only site of first failure 3% for IIIA disease versus 21% for IIIB inflammatory cancer (p = .02), and local-regional failure as any component of first failure 12% versus 36% (p = .01), respectively. When local-regional failure was analyzed by repeat biopsy, 5/31 (16%) patients with a pathologic complete response treated with radiation only developed a local-regional failure versus 2/53 (4%) with residual disease treated with mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. The 5-year actuarial local-regional failure rate as first site of failure was 23% for radiation only versus 5% for mastectomy and post-operative radiotherapy (p = .07). The response to chemotherapy did not reliably predict local-regional control. Both relapse-free survival and overall survival were significantly better for IIIA versus IIIB patients; stratification by repeat biopsy did not however, significantly affect either relapse-free or overall survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Neoadjuvant concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in stage II/III breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and pathologic response rates following neoadjuvant paclitaxel and radiation in patients with stage II/III breast cancer and to evaluate the use of sequential biopsies to allow an in vivo assessment of biological markers as potential predictive markers of response to this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with high-risk, operable breast cancer were treated with three cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, followed by twice-weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m2 and concurrent radiation. Core biopsies were obtained at baseline and 24 to 72 hours after the first cycle of paclitaxel. After completing neoadjuvant treatment, patients underwent definitive surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response, which is defined as the absence of any invasive cancer at surgery. Potential markers of therapeutic response were evaluated including markers of proliferation, apoptosis, p21, HER2, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients enrolled, 13 (34%) had a pathologic complete response. There was no significant difference in baseline Ki-67 between responders (35%) and nonresponders (28%; P = 0.45). There was also no significant change in Ki-67 following paclitaxel administration. Despite this lack of immunohistologic change in proliferative activity, baseline mitotic index was higher for patients with pathologic complete response over nonresponders (27 versus 10, P = 0.003). Moreover, the increase in mitotic index following paclitaxel administration was associated with pathologic complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/radiation is effective and well tolerated. Tumor proliferation at baseline and response to chemotherapy as measured by mitotic activity may serve as an important indicator of pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel/radiation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Neoadjuvant therapy for surgically staged IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC is associated with a 50-70% resection rate and a 3-5 year survival of 20-32%, but few trials have required meticulous staging of the mediastinum to ensure homogeneity of the study population. Continuous infusion cisplatin 25 mg/m2/day 1-5, 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day 2-5, and high-dose leukovorin 500 mg/m2/day 1-5 (PFL) given every 4 weeks achieved a 41% response rate in metastatic NSCLC (Lynch TJ, Kalish LA, Kass F, Strauss G, Elias A, Skarin A, Shulman L, Sugarbaker D, Frei E. Continuous infusion cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leukovorin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1994; 73: 1171-1176). The regimen was therefore evaluated in 34 patients with pathologic Stage IIIA N2 disease between 3/91 and 10/92. METHODS: Staging consisted of chest, liver, brain computerized tomography and bone scan, bronchoscopy and surgical mediastinal node mapping. Patients received PFL for 3 cycles, followed by thoracotomy and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) to 54-60 Gy. RESULTS: Median age was 57 (42-68) years. Demographic factors included: male 56%; adenocarcinoma 59%, squamous cell carcinoma 24%; Stage T3N2 26%, T2N2 56%, and T1N2 18%. No treatment related deaths occurred. Radiographically defined response to PFL was 65% (6% complete). Thoracotomy was performed in 28 patients (82%) (6 had no attempt due to disease progression). Complete resection was achieved in 21 (75%) and seven were unresectable. Pathologic complete response was observed in five patients (15%) and an additional unresectable patient had fibrosis-only documented at thoracotomy for an overall clinicopathologic response rate of 76% (18% pathologic CR). Another ten patients had residual primary with or without hilar disease with resolution of previously documented mediastinal involvement. Six (18%) patients remain alive and disease-free with a median follow-up of 46 (33-50) months, four of whom had achieved pathologic complete response at time of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term event-free survival was associated with complete surgical resection which in turn was associated with clinical response to chemotherapy. There was a possible trend associating pathologic downstaging (absent residual disease in mediastinal nodes), particularly pathologic complete response observed in patients with non-bulky mediastinal disease, with improved event-free survival. Pathologic downstaging might therefore be a useful surrogate endpoint in trials evaluating the preoperative activity of new chemotherapy regimens. While radiographic response generally correlated with findings at surgery, response as determined by histologic examination of resected tissue was generally more extensive and may more accurately reflect the systemic impact of the chemotherapy regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: a randomized Phase II study.

PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with cisplatin (C) concurrent with radiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB2, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma in a preoperative setting. The main endpoints were the pathologic response rate and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 83 patients were randomized to either C or GC. Treatment consisted of six doses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for Arm 1 (C) and six doses of gemcitabine at 125 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for or Arm 2 (GC) Both regimens were administered concurrent with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 2-Gy fractions for 5 weeks. After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent radical hysterectomy. RESULTS: All 83 patients were studied for toxicity and 80 for response. The complete pathologic response rate in the C arm and GC arm was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35.5-73%) and 77.5% (95% confidence interval, 57-90%; p = 0.0201). Among those with a partial response, 7 patients each had high and intermediate-high risk factors for recurrence in their surgical specimens in the C arm vs. 2 and 3 patients, respectively, with these characteristics in the CG arm. The number of weekly doses and the dose intensity of GC were lower than for C. The time to complete external beam radiotherapy also favored the C arm. The CG combination produced greater GI and hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: The radiosensitizing combination of GC achieved a greater pathologic response rate than C in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with transmural or node-positive rectal cancer benefit from the addition of chemoradiation to surgical resection. Administration of the chemoradiation (combined modality therapy) preoperatively has gained popularity in recent years. Some patients undergo apparent complete tumor regression after preoperative combined modality therapy, and controversy exists about the proper management of these patients. Some investigators have proposed that such patients should simply be observed and not undergo resection. STUDY DESIGN: The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of clinical complete response to preoperative combined modality therapy. Specifically, we have attempted to determine the frequency with which a clinical complete response (based on the absence of detectable tumor on preoperative digital rectal examination and proctoscopy) correlates with a pathologic complete response (based on the absence of cancer cells in the resected specimen). A retrospective review of the clinical and pathologic characteristics of 488 patients from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering prospective colorectal database who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by resection for primary rectal cancer was performed. The indications for preoperative therapy included clinical or ultrasound T3 or T4 tumors or node-positive disease. RESULTS: The clinical complete response rate to preoperative therapy was 19%. All patients underwent resection subsequent to preoperative therapy regardless of response. The pathologic complete response rate among all patients was 10%. The pathologic complete response rate among clinical complete responders was 25%. Clinical complete response was a significant predictive factor for pathologic complete response, but the majority (75%) of clinical complete responders had persistent foci of tumor that were not detectable on preoperative examination or proctoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical complete response to preoperative therapy as determined by preoperative digital rectal examination and proctoscopy or EUA is not an accurate predictor of pathologic complete response. A significant percentage of clinical complete responders have persistent deep tumors or nodal involvement. We do not recommend making treatment decisions based solely on the absence of clinically palpable or visible tumor after chemoradiation. Our data suggest that all acceptable-risk patients with a diagnosis of primary rectal cancer should undergo resection, regardless of their response to preoperative therapy.

Adult↗