Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PRIMATES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

[Comparative anatomy of the tongue of Pan troglodytes (Blumenbach, 1799) and other primates. II. Findings in other primates].

This 2nd part of our studies shows that the papilla foliata is fully developed in Pan, Cebus, and Macaca; in Prosimians the papilla foliata is well developed in Lemur and Chirogaleus. In Galago crassicaudatus, this papilla is missing. Among 3 individuals of Microcebus, the papilla foliata was differently developed: in 2 cases, the tongue exhibited only 2 on both sides and a very low folia. Taste buds were found in the epithelium of only one side of each folium. In the 3rd case, the folia of the papilla were developed only on one side of the tongue, whereas, on the other side, a typical papilla was missing. Instead of the papilla, the tongue of the same animal exhibited a hillock-like structure; it is a gustatory hillock which exhibited many taste buds. There were 3 gustatory hillocks in all of the specimens of Tupaia glis; they are situated on both sides of the tongue.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Characterization of constitutive heterochromatin in Cebus apella (Cebidae, Primates) and Pan troglodytes (Hominidae, Primates): comparison to human chromosomes.

Using G bands, some homologies between the chromosomes of Cebus apella (CAP) and human chromosomes are difficult to establish. To solve this problem, we analyzed these homologies by fluorescence in situ hybridization using human whole chromosome probes (ZOO-FISH). The results indicated that 1) the human probe for chromosome 2 partially hybridizes with CAP chromosomes 13 and 5, 2) the human probe for chromosome 3 partially hybridizes with CAP chromosomes 18 and 20, 3) the human probe for chromosome 9 partially hybridizes with CAP chromosome 19, and 4) the human probe for chromosome 14 hybridizes with the p-terminal and q-terminal regions of CAP chromosome 6. However, none of the human probes employed hybridized with the heterochromatic regions of CAP chromosomes. For this reason, we characterized the heterochromatic regions of CAP chromosomes and of the chromosomes of Pan troglodytes (PTR), to allow comparison between CAP, PTR, and human chromosomes using in situ digestion of fixed chromosomes with the restriction enzymes AluI, HaeIII, and RsaI and by fluorescent staining with DA/DAPI. The results show that 1) centromeric heterochromatin is heterogeneous in the three species studied and 2) noncentromeric heterochromatin is homogeneous within each of the three species, but is different for each species. Thus, centromeric heterochromatin undergoes a higher degree of variability than noncentromeric heterochromatin.

Animals↗