Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PAIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

The relationship between depression, clinical pain, and experimental pain in a chronic pain cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with chronic pain frequently display comorbid depression, but the impact of symptoms of depression on pain processing is not completely understood. This study evaluated the effect of symptoms of depression and/or clinically diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) on pain processing in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Results of quantitative sensory testing and neural responses to equally painful pressure stimuli (measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]) were compared with the levels of symptoms of depression and comorbid MDD among patients with FM. RESULTS: Neither the level of symptoms of depression nor the presence of comorbid MDD was associated with the results of sensory testing or the magnitude of neuronal activation in brain areas associated with the sensory dimension of pain (primary and secondary somatosensory cortices). However, symptoms of depression and the presence of MDD were associated with the magnitude of pain-evoked neuronal activations in brain regions associated with affective pain processing (the amygdalae and contralateral anterior insula). Clinical pain intensity was associated with measures of both the sensory dimension of pain (results of sensory testing) and the affective dimension of pain (activations in the insula bilaterally, contralateral anterior cingulate cortex, and prefrontal cortex). CONCLUSION: In patients with FM, neither the extent of depression nor the presence of comorbid major depression modulates the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain processing (i.e., localizing pain and reporting its level of intensity), as measured by sensory testing or fMRI. However, depression is associated with the magnitude of neuronal activation in brain regions that process the affective-motivational dimension of pain. These data suggest that there are parallel, somewhat independent neural pain-processing networks for sensory and affective pain elements. The implication for treatment is that addressing an individual's depression (e.g., by prescribing an antidepressant medication that has no analgesic properties) will not necessarily have an impact on the sensory dimension of pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Measurement of pain: the psychometric properties of the Pain-O-Meter, a simple, inexpensive pain assessment tool that could change health care practices.

A self-administered pain assessment tool called the Pain-O-Meter (POM) was developed for the purposes of improving assessment and management of pain in acute and chronic pain patients. The POM is a hard, white, plastic tool that measures 8-in. long by 2-in. wide and 1-in. thick. Two methods for assessing pain are located on the POM. The first is a 10-cm visual analogue scale (POM-VAS) with a moveable marker that patients use to rate their pain. The second is a list of 15 sensory and 11 affective word descriptors (WDS). Each WDS is assigned an intensity value that can be as low as 1 or as high as 5. A pain intensity score is provided for the sensory and the affective WDSs. This psychometric study, which employed correlational and comparative designs, investigated the test-retest reliability and the concurrent and construct validity of the POM-VAS and the POM-WDS in 279 patients with acute or chronic pain. High correlations were found between initial and repeat pain intensity ratings on the POM-VAS (r = 0.88, P < 0.001) and POM-WDS (r + 0.84, P < 0.001) (test-retest reliability). Correlations between the POM-WDS and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (r = 0.69, P < 0.001) and POM-VAS (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) supported the concurrent validity of the POM-WDS. Construct validity was also supported for the Pain-O-Meter by showing that pain scores decreased significantly for POM-WDS (t + 5.53, P < 0.001), and POM-VAS (t = 6.18, P < 0.001) after the patients were treated with pain medication. The use of a pain tool, such as the POM, could improve patient care by facilitating the documentation of pain and evaluation of pain relief measures.

Cost Control↗
PubMed2003

Postoperative pain management: study of patients' level of pain and satisfaction with health care providers' responsiveness to their reports of pain.

The present prospective survey was conducted in a 1200-bed hospital to examine postoperative patients' current pain intensity, most intense pain experienced, satisfaction with postoperative pain management, and differences regarding pain and satisfaction levels. All adult patients admitted to a hospital in Hong Kong for surgery, except those receiving local anesthesia, were eligible to enter this study. The patient outcome questionnaire developed by the American Pain Society was used to solicit data about patients' pain and satisfaction with pain relief. The subjects were 294 postoperative patients. Approximately 85% complained about varying degrees of pain during the 24 h prior to the assessment of their pain. When interviewed, most patients complained of mild to moderate pain (median = 2 on a 10-point scale), while the median for 'worst pain intensity' was 5. Approximately 80% of the subjects indicated that both the nurses and physicians reminded them to report pain when it occurred. Only 143 (48.6%) agreed that the nurses and physicians sufficiently emphasized the importance of pain relief. Those who received acute pain services, provided by anesthetists, reported lower levels of current pain intensity. Over 65% of the subjects were satisfied with all levels of health care providers, regarding their postoperative pain management.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A comparative study of women with chronic pelvic pain, chronic nonpelvic pain and those with no history of pain attending general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the demographic and psychosocial profiles of women with chronic pelvic pain, chronic pain in a different site, and those with no history of pain with specific reference to a history of sexual abuse. DESIGN: A prospective comparative study. SETTING: Pelvic Pain Clinic at Leicester General Hospital NHS Trust, Pain Management Clinic at Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust and two General Practices. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty women with chronic pelvic pain, 30 women with chronic pain in a different site and 30 women attending their general practitioner with no history of pain. INTERVENTIONS: A specifically designed patient profile questionnaire to identify and explore incidents of sexual and physical abuse was administered to each woman by a research psychologist for confidential self-completion. Data were also collected on other demographic, medical and psychosocial characteristics. RESULTS: Women with chronic pelvic pain were found to have a higher lifetime prevalence of sexual abuse, involving penetration or other genital contact compared with the two comparison groups. The prevalence of physical abuse was the same in all groups. Women in the pelvic pain group were more likely to have approached their GP for symptoms not related to pelvic pain than women in the other two groups and the incidence of clinical anxiety was significantly higher in this group compared with the pain-free group. The prevalence of sexual problems was much higher in the group with pelvic pain compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that women with chronic pelvic pain have a higher incidence of past sexual abuse compared with women in a comparison pain group and with women with no pain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Self-efficacy for managing pain is associated with disability, depression, and pain coping among retirement community residents with chronic pain.

UNLABELLED: Little is known about cognitive and behavioral factors that influence older adults' adjustment to chronic pain. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship of self-efficacy for managing pain to reports of pain intensity, pain-related disability, depressive symptoms, and pain coping strategy use among 140 retirement community residents (88% female; age mean = 81.7, range 66-99 years) with chronic pain. The 8-item Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, modified to specify pain rather than arthritis, demonstrated good psychometric characteristics (Cronbach alpha = .89, minimal floor and ceiling effects, and validity) in this sample. Controlling for age, gender, and pain intensity, self-efficacy was associated significantly and negatively with pain-related disability and depressive symptoms (P values < .001), and positively with use of pain coping strategies previously found to be associated with better outcomes (task persistence, exercise/stretch, coping self-statements, activity pacing; P values < .05). Self-efficacy for managing pain appears to be important in the adjustment of older adults with pain. Research is needed to determine whether interventions designed to increase self-efficacy improve quality of life and prevent functional declines in this population. PERSPECTIVE: Among retirement community residents (mean age of 82 years) with chronic pain, higher self-efficacy for managing pain is associated with less disability and depression and with the use of pain coping strategies related to better adjustment. This suggests the potential value of interventions to increase self-efficacy in this population.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2003

Agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from numeric rating scores of pain intensity and those reported by patients with acute or cancer pain.

The use of percentage pain reduction is increasingly used to evaluate the effectiveness of pain treatments, but the degree of agreement between calculated percentage pain reduction (CPPR) as calculated from pre- and post-treatment levels of pain intensity and those reported directly by patients is unknown. Lack of agreement between these two measures could lead to errors in the determination of treatment effectiveness. We aimed to determine the agreement between CPPR and patient-reported percentage pain reduction (PRPPR). Patients with acute or cancer pain were asked to rate their pain intensity on a 0-10 verbal numerical rating scale (NRS) and to estimate the percent pain reduction from baseline pain after analgesic administration. They then received analgesics every 10 min until pain intensity declined to 4/10 or less. To evaluate agreement between CPPR and PRPPR, we computed the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), which measures both accuracy and precision, and estimated the 95% limits of agreement for the differences between these two measures. 761 adult patients were enrolled. Female, healthy patients with acute pain of severe intensity and high levels of education predominated in the sample. The mean difference between CPPR and PRPPR was -2.6% (95% limits of agreement -12 to 17%). The CCC was 0.56 (accuracy was 0.9 and precision was 0.6). Although CPPR appeared to underestimate PRPPR in the higher range, this trend was not clinically important. The agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from NRS scores and those estimated by patients did not vary according to gender or age. The good overall agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from NRS scores and those estimated by patients suggests that these indices may be used interchangeably. The findings of this study extend existing patient-centered pain research and may be applied for the evaluation and comparison of pain treatments.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Patient satisfaction with pain management does not correlate with initial or discharge VAS pain score, verbal pain rating at discharge, or change in VAS score in the Emergency Department.

The aim of this study was to correlate patient satisfaction with pain management in the Emergency Department (ED) with initial and discharge visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, verbal pain rating at discharge, and change in VAS pain score between presentation and discharge. It was conducted as a prospective observational study of patients who presented to an urban, adult ED experiencing pain and who were later discharged. Fifty-four patients completed the study of whom 70% rated the management of their pain as 'good' or 'very good.' There was no correlation between patient satisfaction with pain management initial VAS pain score, discharge VAS pain score, verbal rating of pain at discharge, or change in VAS pain score between presentation and discharge. The study suggests that patient satisfaction with pain management does not correlate with initial or discharge VAS pain score, verbal rating of pain at discharge or change in pain score in the ED. Therefore, information about the quality of analgesia provided in an ED cannot be inferred from patient satisfaction surveys.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Breakthrough pain in opioid-treated chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain centre: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough pain (BTP) has not formerly been discussed as such in chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to pain centres and clinics. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence, characteristics and mechanisms of BTP in opioid-treated chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a pain centre and to assess the short-term effects of pain treatment. METHODS: Patients were assessed at referral (T(0)) and after a treatment period of 3 months (T(3)) using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the brief pain inventory (BPI) within somatic nociceptive, neuropathic and/or visceral pain conditions, the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). The main treatment intervention from T(0) to T(3) was to convert short-acting oral opioids to long-acting oral opioids and to discontinue on demand and parenteral use of opioids. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were assessed at T(0) and 27 at T(3). The prevalence of BTP declined significantly from T(0) (90%) to T(3) (70.4%). Worst, least, average and current pain intensities as well as duration of BTP were significantly reduced from T(0) to T(3.) The majority of BTPs were exacerbation of background pain assumed to be of the same pain mechanisms. High average pain intensity (BPI) was significantly associated with high scores for both anxiety and depression (HADS). CONCLUSION: BTP in chronic non-malignant pain patients seems to be surprisingly frequent and severe. Stabilizing the opioid regimen seems to reduce pain intensity in general as well as the intensity and duration of BTP. Average pain intensity was associated with anxiety and depression.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Effectiveness of the lidocaine patch 5% on pain qualities in three chronic pain states: assessment with the Neuropathic Pain Scale.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the lidocaine patch 5% on pain qualities associated with chronic pain from postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), painful diabetic neuropathy (DN), and low-back pain (LBP), using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PHN, painful DN, and LBP were enrolled if they had partial response to gabapentin-containing analgesic regimens and if they reported moderate-to-severe pain on the NPS at study enrollment. Eligible patients were included in an open-label, non-randomized, prospective, 2-week study across 7 clinical trial sites in the United States. The lidocaine patch 5% was applied to the area of maximal pain, using no more than a total of 4 patches changed every 24 h. Patients were maintained on their other analgesic regimens with no dose adjustment or additions allowed. Treatment effect was measured by change from baseline to Week 2 in 4 composite measures of the NPS: NPS-10, NPS-4, NPS-8, and NPS-non-allodynia. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), dermal assessment of application site(s), and skin sensory testing. RESULTS: In the combined patient population (n = 77), 2 weeks of treatment with the lidocaine patch 5% significantly improved all 4 composite measures (p < 0.01). In the subgroup analyses, the lidocaine patch 5% demonstrated numerical advantage for all 4 NPS composite measures for the PHN patients (n = 8), and significantly improved all 4 composite measures for the painful DN patients (n = 41; p < 0.001) and LBP patients (n = 28; p < or = 0.005). Overall, 8 patients (10%) experienced mild-to-moderate treatment-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The lidocaine patch 5% effectively reduces the intensity of all common pain qualities in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain resulting from PHN, painful DN, or LBP. Treatment is well tolerated in combination with other analgesic regimens, with no reports of serious AEs or adverse drug interactions. Assessment scales such as the NPS may offer the possibility to differentiate between various pain states and to assess treatment outcomes for various pain qualities associated with a given pain state.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1998

Pain maps from facial pain patients indicate a broad pain geography.

Two hundred consecutive female patients, who were referred to a university-based facial pain clinic, were asked to mark all painful sites on sketches showing the contours of a human body in the frontal and rear views. The drawings were analyzed with transparent templates containing 1875 (frontal view) and 1929 (rear view) square cells of equal size. The average patient scored 71.8 cells in the frontal and 99.7 cells in the rear view (corresponding to 3.8% and 5.2% of the maximum possible scores). In individual patient drawings, however, up to 42.7% and 44.9% of all cells were marked. Only 37 cases (18.5%) exhibited pain that was limited to the trigeminal system. An analysis of the pain distribution according to the arrangements of dermatomes revealed three distinct clusters of patients: (1) pain restricted to the region innervated by the trigeminal nerves (n = 37); (2) pain in the trigeminal dermatomes and any combination involving the spinal dermatomes C2, C3, and C4, but no other dermatomes (n = 32); and (3) pain sites involving dermatomes in addition to the ones listed above (n = 131). Mean ages in the three clusters were 38.7, 35.5, and 37.5 years, respectively (p = 0.62, n.s.). Widespread pain existed for longer durations (median, 48 months) than conditions involving local and regional pain (median, 24 months) (p = 0.02, s.). Our findings showed that among a great percentage of persistent facial pain patients the pain distribution is more widespread than commonly assumed, and that the persistence of pain in the regional and widespread pain presentations is significantly greater than in cases with pain limited to the trigeminal system.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

The relationship between gender and family history of pain with current pain experience and awareness of pain in others.

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between family history of pain and current pain experience in a student population. In a sample of 180 students who completed a pain history questionnaire there was a significant difference between males and females with women reporting significantly more pain models than men even when menstrual pain models were excluded from the analysis. There was also a difference on current pain symptoms, with women reporting more pain symptoms but this difference was no longer significant when menstrual pain was excluded. These results suggest that differences observed between sexes in a young student population in relation to current pain symptom reports may be accounted for by the presence of menstrual pain rather than by differences in family history of pain as it has previously been suggested. The higher incidence of pain models reported by females for menstrual as well as non-menstrual pain suggests a greater awareness of pain in others without implying a greater tendency for the young females as a group to report pain themselves.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Changes in readiness to self-manage pain are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment and pain coping.

A patient's readiness to adopt a self-management approach to pain has been hypothesized to increase during multidisciplinary pain treatment and to impact pain coping responses. The Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ; [J Pain (1997) 227]) was designed to assess four components of readiness to self-manage pain: pre-contemplation, contemplation, action, and maintenance. We tested three hypotheses concerning this construct in two different samples of patients with chronic pain: (1) readiness to self-manage pain, as assessed by the PSOCQ, would increase from pre-multidisciplinary pain treatment to post-treatment and follow-up; (2) changes in readiness to self-manage pain measured pre-treatment to post-treatment and follow-up would be associated with changes in the use of pain coping strategies; and (3) increases in readiness to self-manage pain would be associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment. The findings supported all three hypotheses. We discuss the implications of the findings for understanding motivational issues in the self-management of pain.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2006

[Practical pain control in pediatric oncology. Recommendations of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, the German Association for the Study of Pain, the German Society of Palliative Care, and the Vodafone Institute of Children's Pain Therapy and Palliative Care].

In pediatric oncology, optimal pain control is still a challenge. A structured pain history and the regular scoring of pain intensity using age-adapted measuring tools are hallmarks of optimal pain control. Psychological measures are as important as drug therapy in the prophylaxis or control of pain, especially when performing invasive procedures. Pain control is oriented toward the WHO multistep therapeutic schedule. On no account should the pediatric patient have to climb up the "analgesic ladder" - strong pain requires the primary use of strong opioids. Give opioids preferably by the oral route and by the clock - short-acting opioids should be used to treat breakthrough pain. Alternatives are i.v. infusion, patient-controlled analgesia, and transdermal applications. Constipation is the adverse effect most often seen with (oral) opioid therapy. Adverse effects should be anticipated, and prophylactic treatment should be given consistently. The assistance of pediatric nurses is of the utmost importance in pediatric pain control. Nurses deliver the basis for rational and effective pain control by scoring pain intensity and documenting drug administration as well as adverse effects. The nurses' task is also to prepare the patient for and monitor the patient during painful procedures. It is the responsibility of both nurse and doctor to guarantee emergency intervention during sedation whenever needed. In our guideline we comment on drug selection and dosage, pain measurement tools, and documentation tools for the purpose of pain control. Those tools may be easily integrated into daily routine.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1988

Cluster headache pain vs. other vascular headache pain: differences revealed with two approaches to the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

We compared cluster headache pain and other vascular (migraine and mixed) headache pain on pain intensity ratings and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Cluster headache sufferers reported not only more intense pain and more affective distress, but also different pain qualities than did migraine and mixed headache sufferers. The pain qualities that best distinguished cluster headaches from other vascular headaches were the presence of punctate pressure and thermal sensations and the absence of dull pain. Although cluster headache sufferers and other vascular headache sufferers endorsed different sensory pain qualities, MPQ subscales proved no better than pain intensity ratings at distinguishing these two groups. This finding may have occurred because MPQ subscale scores include an intensity component and do not provide information about specific pain qualities such as that provided by MPQ sensory items. These findings provide evidence that cluster headaches are characterized by distinct pain qualities and are not simply a more intense version of the same vascular headache pain experienced by migraine and mixed headache sufferers. They further suggest than when the MPQ is used to assess specific pain qualities, sensory items and not the sensory subscale are the preferred units for analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Association of neck pain, disability and neck pain during maximal effort with neck muscle strength and range of movement in women with chronic non-specific neck pain.

Several studies have reported lower neck muscle strength in patients with chronic neck pain compared to healthy controls. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the severity of neck pain and disability with neck strength and range of movement in women suffering from chronic neck pain. One hundred and seventy-nine female office workers with chronic neck pain were selected to the study. The outcome was assessed by the self-rating questionnaires on neck pain (visual analogue scale, Vernon's disability index, Neck pain and disability index) and by measures of the passive range of movement (ROM) and maximal isometric neck muscle strength. No statistically significant correlation was found between perceived neck pain and the disability indices and the maximal isometric neck strength and ROM measures. However, the pain values reported during the strength tests were inversely correlated with the results of strength tests (r=-0.24 to -0.46), showing that pain was associated with decreased force production. About two-thirds of the patients felt pain during test efforts. Pain may prevent full effort during strength tests and hence the production of maximal force. Thus in patients with chronic neck pain the results do not always describe true maximal strength, but rather the patients' ability to bear strain, which may be considerably influenced by their painful condition. The results of the present study suggest that rehabilitation in cases of chronic neck pain should aim at raising tolerance to mechanical strain.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Acute low back pain: pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing influence physical performance and perceived disability.

Pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing are associated with disability and actual performance in chronic pain patients. In acute low back pain (LBP), little is known about the prediction of actual performance or perceived disability by pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing. This experimental, cross-sectional study aimed at examining whether pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing were associated with actual performance and perceived disability. Ninety six individuals with an episode of acute LBP performed a dynamic lifting task to measure actual performance. Total lifting time was used as outcome measure. The results show that pain-related fear, as measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, was the strongest predictor of this physical task. Using the Roland Disability Questionnaire as a measure of perceived disability, both pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing, as measured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, were significantly predictive of perceived disability and more strongly than pain intensity was. The results of the current study suggest that pain-related fear is an important factor influencing daily activities in individuals suffering an episode of acute LBP. The study results have important clinical implications, especially in the development of preventive strategies for chronic LBP.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Catastrophizing is associated with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain after spinal cord injury.

Little research has examined the role of patient cognitive and behavioral responses, including catastrophizing, in adjustment to chronic pain associated with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study was to examine the associations of catastrophizing and specific pain coping strategies with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain and SCI, after controlling for important demographic and SCI-related variables that might affect outcomes. Participants in this study were 174 community residents with SCI and chronic pain who completed a mailed questionnaire that included the SF-36 Mental Health scale, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, and Graded Chronic Pain Scale. The pain coping and catastrophizing measures explained an additional 29% of the variance in pain intensity after adjusting for the demographic and SCI variables (P<0.001). The coping and catastrophizing scales accounted for an additional 30% of the variance in psychological distress (P<0.001) and 11% of the variance in pain-related disability (P<0.001), after controlling for pain intensity and demographic and SCI variables. Catastrophizing, but not any other single pain coping strategy, was consistently strongly and independently associated with the outcome measures. Potentially, the assessment and treatment of catastrophizing may reduce psychological distress and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain and SCI.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2005

Expectation of pain replicates the effect of pain in a hand laterality recognition task: bias in information processing toward the painful side?

BACKGROUND: People in pain, or expecting pain, sometimes bias their attention towards pain-relevant cues. Perhaps they also bias their attention towards the body part in question. AIM: To determine if experimentally induced pain, and the expectation of pain, involve an information processing bias towards the hand in question. METHODS: Seventeen asymptomatic subjects performed a hand laterality recognition task during three conditions: control, during hand pain induced by intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline (pain), and during expectation of hand pain, induced by isotonic saline injection (expectation). Mean response time (RT) was determined for three 45 s epochs within each condition and RT was compared between hands, conditions and epochs using a 2 x 3 x 3 repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a hand x condition interaction and a hand x condition x epoch interaction (p<0.05 for both). RT to recognise the opposite hand was approximately 600 ms longer during epochs when subjects were in pain or expected pain than during control trials. During those epochs, RT to recognise the opposite hand was approximately 600 ms longer than RT to recognise the injected hand, which was consistent across conditions and across epochs. CONCLUSIONS: Both pain and the expectation of pain increased RT to recognise the opposite hand. The findings are consistent with a bias in information processing toward the painful or impending painful hand.

Adult↗