Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Osteogenesis, Distraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Simultaneous maxillary distraction osteogenesis using a twin-track distraction device combined with alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients: preliminary report of a technique.

The simultaneous use of cleft reduction and maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis has not been applied routinely because of the difficulty in three-dimensional control and stabilization of the transported segments. This report describes a new approach of simultaneous bilateral alveolar cleft reduction and maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis combined with autogenous bone grafting. A custom-made Twin-Track device was used to allow bilateral alveolar cleft closure combined with simultaneous maxillary advancement, using distraction osteogenesis and a rigid external distraction system in a bilateral cleft lip and palate patient. After a maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy, autogenous iliac bone graft was placed in the cleft spaces before suturing. A latency period of six days was observed before activation. The rate of activation was one mm/d for the maxillary advancement and 0.5 mm/d for the segmental transport. Accordingly, the concave facial appearance was improved with acceptable occlusion, and complete bilateral cleft closure was attained. No adjustments were necessary to the vector of the transported segments during the activation and no complications were observed. The proposed Twin-Track device, based on the concept of track-guided bone transport, permitted three-dimensional control over the distraction processes allowing simultaneous cleft closure, maxillary distraction, and autogenous bone grafting. The combined simultaneous approach is extremely advantageous in correcting severe deformities, reducing the number of surgical interventions and, consequently, the total treatment time.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Spring-mediated mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Successful performance of distraction osteogenesis requires rigorous patient compliance with a daily activation regimen of a percutaneous screw. Previous clinical studies have found that failure of patient compliance with this regimen is the most common complication leading to technical failure of the distraction process. The authors have developed an internalized spring-mediated device for mandibular distraction osteogenesis that can potentially abrogate the risks associated with patient compliance by allowing for automated distraction across an osteotomy. Twenty adult New Zealand White rabbits underwent unilateral mandibular osteotomy. A segment of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy reinforced at both ends with a pinball was fashioned into an inferiorly based arc and secured to the mandible with stainless steel wire. On postoperative day 12, spring activation commenced by cutting a wire binding the two pinballs to one another. Animals were observed for 6 weeks before they were killed. Radiographic studies and decalcified histologic analysis were performed on extracted mandibles. Temperature- and displacement-dependent properties of the shape memory alloy were also examined. Five animals were excluded from the study due to infection, nonunion, or device failure. A mean distraction of 1.2 mm in the distracted hemimandible relative to the nonoperated hemimandible was found (P <.001, two-tailed paired t test). The maximum distraction achieved in an experimental specimen using the spring distractor was 3.7 mm. There were no other histologic or radiographic differences found between study specimens and specimens subjected to traditional distraction methods. Biomechanical testing of the shape memory alloy revealed a temperature-dependent increase in force at body temperature compared with room temperature and a reduction in force with increased displacement of the spring. This study demonstrates the feasibility of spring-mediated distraction osteogenesis across an osteotomy. As the field of distraction osteogenesis matures, the next level of sophistication in the clinical development of devices will incorporate technology that permits fully internalized and automated distraction to occur.

Alloys↗
PubMed1998

Distraction osteogenesis: the effects of orthodontic tooth movement on distracted mandibular bone.

The application of distraction osteogenesis in craniomaxillofacial surgery has created new treatment methods for patients with craniofacial skeletal dysplasias. Most of the applications in the craniofacial skeleton have been for the correction of severe congenital or acquired conditions. As more understanding is gained with these new approaches, refinements in techniques will enhance treatment planning and outcome. This will expand the application of distraction osteogenesis to more common, less severe types of skeletal dysplasias. One of the important areas in mandibular distraction osteogenesis is the management of the dental gap created when distraction is applied within the tooth-bearing segment of the mandibular body. In this study, the authors investigated the effects of orthodontic tooth movement into new bone created through the process of distraction osteogenesis. Orthodontic tooth movement through newly formed mandibular bone in the canine model was performed and, through histologic studies, was found to create compact bone along the path of the moving tooth. This compact bone replaced the more unstructured woven bone that was originally created by the process of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. These findings indicate that orthodontic tooth movement can be performed in distracted bone and can have significant influence on the stability and long-term structural preservation of the bone created by distraction osteogenesis within the tooth-bearing segment of the mandible.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Model surgery prediction for mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis.

Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis is available as a treatment option for the correction of mandibular transverse arch deficiency. A model surgery technique is presented here through a case report that will allow the surgeon to predict the amount of transverse expansion that can be gained by this procedure. Utilizing measurements from a three-dimensional stereolithography model, the mandibular cast is mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator. The maxillary model is mounted onto the articulator using an interocclusal record. Acrylic straps are fabricated that relate the condylar elements of the articulator to the right and left mandibular dental segments. The mandibular model is sectioned at the midline, the hemi-mandibular segments are rotated laterally until the desired midline expansion is achieved and the mandibular model is luted into its new position. The post-expansion relationship of the maxillary and mandibular arches can be visualized on the articulator and provide useful information to the surgeon and orthodontist.

Cephalometry↗
PubMed1999

Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.

The effect of maxillary advancement on speech may have benefits on articulation improvement but compromises velopharyngeal (VP) closure by increasing the nasopharyngeal distance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the static VP anatomic changes on lateral cephalograms in patients who underwent maxillary advancement through distraction osteogenesis (DO) with a rigid external distraction device and to correlate these changes with clinical speech data. Twenty-two patients (5 female and 17 male) underwent maxillary advancement through DO utilizing a rigid external distraction device (age, 5.2 to 25.7 years) with various diagnoses, including 13 unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients, 5 bilateral CLP patients, 1 isolated cleft palate patient, 2 facial cleft patients, and 1 patient with craniosynostosis. Lateral cephalograms of preoperative, immediate postdistraction, and 1-year postdistraction were obtained for analysis. Speech evaluation was performed preoperatively, immediate postdistraction, and then at 6-month intervals, and included assessment of air pressure flow, hypernasality, and articulation. With an average amount of 8.9 mm maxillary forward advancement, 14% of patients (3 of 21) presented deterioration in hypernasality. However, 57% of patients (12 of 21) demonstrated improvement in articulation. The cephalometric analysis demonstrated an increase in nasopharyngeal depth by 8.5 mm (1:1 ratio with bony movement) and velar angle by 14.1 deg. The length of the soft palate remained unchanged. The need ratio (intersection of palatal plane and posterior pharyngeal wall-posterior nasal spine/posterior nasal spine--tip of uvula) worsens after distraction. The deterioration of hypernasality was related to the amount of forward distraction, especially in patients without a preexisting pharyngeal flap (PF). Speech evaluation is an important aspect concerning treatment planning for maxillary distraction. The increase in nasopharyngeal depth may compromise VP closure. The increase in velar angle was considered to be part of the compensation in the VP mechanism. An adverse effect of a preexisting PF on maxillary distraction was not observed; however, it prevented postoperative hypernasality.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

[The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the distraction osteogenesis].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis during bone distraction. METHODS: The osteoblasts were cultured in vitro. The rabbits were used as the animal model of distraction osteogenesis. The proliferation of osteoblasts was analysed through MTT methods. The osteogenesis was observed by histochemical and histoimmunochemical methods. RESULTS: PRP stimulated the proliferation of osteoblasts and facilitated distraction osteogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: PRP could accelerate the osteogenesis during bone distraction. The application of PRP in clinical practice might shorten the period of distraction osteogenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Growth factors in distraction osteogenesis. Immuno-histological pattern of TGF-beta1 and IGF-I in human callus induced by distraction osteogenesis.

Although growth factors have been demonstrated during bone healing, their presence has not yet been confirmed in callus distraction. Therefore, in 3 patients we searched for cytokines during callus distraction. Bone biopsies were immuno-histochemically stained for TGF-beta1, IGF-I, TGF-beta type II receptor, IGF receptor, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Histologically we found immature woven bone in the middle of the callus zone and increasing calcification and lamellar bone in the re-modelling zone. Osteoblasts and fibroblast-like cells in the middle zone, and osteoblasts in all zones stained for TGF-beta and its receptor. The number of positive staining cells related to proliferous activity as assessed both by PCNA, and by bone density in radiographs. IGF-I could be detected everywhere. In conclusion, growth factors are present in bone formation and in areas of re-modelling during callotasis. Their relation to proliferous activity and radiographic density supports their involvement in osteogenesis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Unilateral Brodie bite treated with distraction osteogenesis.

Mandibular widening by distraction osteogenesis has recently been shown to be a very predictable, successful, and stable procedure with limited morbidity. One indication for mandibular widening by distraction osteogenesis is a Brodie bite (scissors or buccal crossbite). This case report demonstrates a technique used to treat a 12-year-old girl with a true unilateral buccal crossbite (no functional shift). It details how distraction osteogenesis can successfully treat unilateral problems with a distractor, a splint, and elastics. Details on this treatment technique have not been previously published.

Child↗
PubMed2003

[Maxillofacial surgery and distraction osteogenesis--history, present, perspective].

The distraction osteogenesis is processes of planning and controlled tension over a bone after osteotomy or corticotomy. The purpose is lengthening on the base of forming a new bone tissue with normal biological characteristics. It presents historical development. The distraction osteogenesis adapts to the needs of oral maxillo-facial surgery in last ten years. The first step was a lengthening of the lower jaw with extraoral apparatus (McCarthy 1992). The surgical techniques and the principals of G. Ilizarov are shown in the overview. It describes the biological aspects of the distraction osteogenesis--the phenomena tension--stress, as such as the effect not only over the bone but over the surrounding soft tissues, blood vessels and nerves. It presents the distraction osteogenesis used in maxillo-facial surgery--mandibular distraction, distraction of alveolar bone, of mid-third face, cranio-orbito-maxillar distraction osteogenesis. Because of easy surgical technique, clinically proved by stable functional and aesthetic results, the distraction osteogenesis has perspectives in future time.

Facial Bones↗
PubMed2004

Management of mandibular hypoplasia using distraction osteogenesis technique.

By using distraction osteogenesis technique, 3 cases of mandibular hypoplasia were treated by home-made and German-made jaw distractors: including one patient suffered from bilateral ankylosis of temporo-mandibular joint and 2 patients from deficiency of mandible. The duration of distraction osteogenesis was one month. The bone distractor was removed 3 months after operation. Satisfactory results were obtained in all 3 cases. Distraction osteogenesis can successfully be used in mandibular functional reconstruction and has much more advantages than traditional technique.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

During recent years, distraction osteogenesis has gained in popularity for the treatment of various bone deficiencies either in the vertical, transverse, or anteroposterior dimension. Distraction osteogenesis has been shown to be an effective technique for mandibular widening and lengthening where traditional orthognathic surgery has important limitations. The intraoral approach to these procedures prevents damage to the inferior alveolar nerve and the developing dental follicles, and eliminates hypertrophic facial scars. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis also avoids donor-site morbidity, and minimizes the need for blood transfusion or prolonged fixation. This intraoral application provides for enhanced patient acceptance and reduces the potentially negative psychosocial effects of wearing an extraoral distraction appliance.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1999

Muscle regeneration and fiber-type transformation during distraction osteogenesis.

The successful outcome of distraction osteogenesis depends in part on the adequate adaptation of the surrounding soft tissue. We characterized the adaptation of the tibialis anterior during distraction osteogenesis at different rates (0.7 and 1.4 mm/day) and amounts (15 and 30%) of lengthening. We documented the increased expression of neonatal and slow myosin heavy chain in the tibialis anterior of skeletally immature rabbits. There was neither expression of neonatal myosin heavy chain in the experimental soleus or in the slow muscle fibers of the tibialis anterior nor increased expression of slow myosin heavy chain in the soleus or gastrocnemius. The increased amount of neonatal myosin heavy chain was concentrated in the distal half of the muscle, whereas the increase in the number of fibers that were labeled with antibodies to slow myosin occurred to the same extent throughout the tibialis anterior. Electrophysiological methods showed that the tibialis anterior was functionally intact during and after distraction osteogenesis. We concluded that in the tibialis anterior of young, skeletally immature animals, distraction osteogenesis seems to induce a recapitulation of the developmental process without leading to functional changes. In addition, during distraction osteogenesis, a fiber-type transformation occurs similar to that observed in models of muscle overloading.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is an established technique for the lengthening of long bones and correction of selected craniofacial deformities. Regenerate osteoid bone matrix formed during the distraction phase is malleable and can recreate the three-dimensional form of native bones. Animal experiments and early clinical experience have confirmed that distraction osteogenesis can be used for the reconstruction of segmental bony defects. Herein we discuss the principles of distraction osteogenesis in reference to reconstruction of segmental bony defects and report its clinical application of the mandible continuity defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients (age, 7-83 years) with critical segmental mandibular defects (range, 3.5 cm-6.5 cm), resulting from ablative oncologic head and neck surgery underwent primary mandibular reconstruction by transport distraction osteogenesis. Two defects were at the angle and body region, one at the body, and the other at the parasymphysis and body region. Synthes Titanium Multi-vector and Leibinger Multi-guide distractors in bifocal (n = 2) and trifocal (n = 2) architecture were used after the stabilization of the segmental continuity defect using a defect-bridging mandibular reconstruction plate. Osteodistraction was carried out at a rate of 1 mm per day, with once or twice a day rhythm, after a 1-week latency period. The consolidation period was equal to the period of distraction. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the distraction procedure. Satisfactory bone formation was observed in two patients, and partial bone formation was seen in one patient. Treatment failure was encountered in one patient who had a second oral cavity primary tumor observed during the consolidation period, requiring interruption of the treatment sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis is a potentially useful technique in selected patients with segmental mandibular continuity defects after ablative head and neck cancer surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Taking the guesswork out of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.

Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis has recently been introduced as a means of resolving arch length deficiencies in the anterior segment and as a method of reducing large vestibular spaces related to a narrow mandible. Accurately relating the required distraction for a given anterior tooth mass and desired future anteroposterior location of the central incisors has not been possible until recently. The relationship between these 3 controlling factors has been mathematically described by the hyperbolic cosine function and a computer program designed for easy use by the clinician. Two clinical cases illustrate the application of the program. A Web site where the program can be downloaded at no cost is mentioned.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

Physical therapy management of patients undergoing limb lengthening by distraction osteogenesis.

Limb lengthening by distraction osteogenesis and external fixation is used increasingly in the United States for a variety of orthopaedic conditions. Maintenance of joint motion, critical for successful outcomes, can be difficult to achieve. The rate of growth needed for distraction osteogenesis is faster than that of normal growing bone. Histogenesis of soft tissues must also occur to maintain the motion in joints above and below the limb being lengthened. Physical therapists in patients' home communities need to be knowledgeable about the aggressive management needed to prevent the loss of joint motion. This article introduces physical therapists to a commonly used external fixator, the procedure of distraction osteogenesis, and the role of functional loading. To assist in treatment planning, a physical therapy management plan is presented. Two case examples illustrate how therapists can assess a patient's status relative to the goals in the management plan and determine intervention priorities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Distraction osteogenesis in the hand.

Distraction osteogenesis was used to correct congenital hand deformities in 12 digits. The patients' ages at the time of distraction ranged between 2.5 and 7 years. A total of nine patients underwent lengthening of 12 bones. The average period of distraction was 31.1 +/- 17.6 days. The average length of distraction was 23.6 +/- 7.3 mm. Seventeen percent of the patients after lengthening had an angular deformity that required remodeling of the regenerate. No infections were noted. Distraction osteogenesis provides a useful tool for reliable and predictable correction of osseous defects with vascular bone in patients with congenital anomalies of the hand.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed2006

Low intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerated bone remodeling during consolidation stage of distraction osteogenesis.

Bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis occurs under tensile stress with axial rhythmic distraction after osteotomy. In this study, we evaluated if the low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) was also effective on enhancement of bone remodeling during consolidation stage of distraction osteogenesis. Open osteotomy of seventeen 18-week-old female New Zealand rabbit tibiae were performed. The distraction was applied with the rate of 1 mm per day. LIPUS (30 mW/cm(2), 1.5 MHz) was delivered for 20 min per day during 4-week consolidation stage (n=10). The animals without treatment served as sham group (n=7). Plain X-ray, peripheral quantitative computational tomography (pQCT), and torsional test were performed. Results showed that smaller radiolucent interzone of LIPUS treatment group was gradually occupied by calcified tissue in plain X-ray at week 2. The bone mineral density (BMD) measured on radiographs increased by 9.18% in the LIPUS group. Bone mineral content (BMC), hard callus volume, and bone strength index (BSI) measured by pQCT were 83%, 116%, and 94%, respectively, in LIPUS group that were significantly greater than those of the controls. At the 4th week, LIPUS-treated callus showed the development of neocorticalization in the proximal and distal region. The BMC, hard callus volume, and BSI of LIPUS group decreased and was not significantly different from control. This was also confirmed by the maximum torque of LIPUS-treated callus (1424.2+/-457.3 N . mm) obtained at week 4, which did not differ from that of the sham group (1968.8+/-895.1 N . mm). In conclusion, the effective period of LIPUS treatment was at the initial stage of consolidation, with accelerated bone formation and remodeling.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Maintaining vector control during alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a technical note.

Distraction osteogenesis is a predictable method for restoring missing tissue prior to implant placement. However, pull from the soft tissue can alter the desired direction of the distraction. This article describes and illustrates techniques that are useful for maintaining the desired vector during alveolar distraction osteogenesis. These methods can prevent the need for further intervention and allow for ideal placement of endosseous dental implants without compromising results.

Alveoloplasty↗