Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Needlestick Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Community acquired needlestick injuries in non-health care workers presenting to an urban emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To review the epidemiology and demographics of community acquired needlestick injuries in non-health care workers attending an urban ED. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with needlestick injuries attending the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital from 1996 to 2001. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty cases were reviewed. The most common mechanism of injury was exposure to discarded syringes (68%). Forty three (36%) injuries were work related. Twenty four (20%) were non-accidental. Ten (8%) patients received human immunodeficiency virus post exposure prophylaxis. There were no viral seroconversions in the patients with data available. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified three groups, males, cleaners and police officers, who are at particular risk of injury. Community education is required so that medical assessment is sought early and to increase awareness of these injuries. The provision of post exposure prophylaxis requires individualized risk assessment, as only in a minority of cases is the source available for testing.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2002

Student nurses in Taiwan at high risk for needlestick injuries.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and characteristics of needlestick injuries (NSI) in student nurses in Taiwan. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 931 student nurses from 16 hospitals randomly selected from the 132 accredited hospitals. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 708 of 931 students who were contacted for participation in this study. NSI during internship was reported by 61.9% (438/708) of students, of whom 14.2% (62/438) made a formal report. The majority (70.1%) of NSI occurred in the patient's room. Hollow-bored needles contributed to half (219/438) of the NSIs of which 86.8% were syringe needles. Just over half (53.2%) of those items involved in NSIs had been used on patients. Of the hollow-bored needles involved in NSIs, 21.5% had been used on a patient with an infectious disease. Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) was lacking in 47.6% of students. CONCLUSIONS: NSIs and non-reporting of NSIs were highly prevalent in nursing students. More intensive education programs should be directed at students to increase their awareness of and compliance with Universal Precautions (UP) before commencing their practical work experience. Students need to practice prompt post-exposure evaluation so that the need for early intervention can be assessed. In addition, any public health and infection control strategy should include a universal catch-up HBV vaccination program among students before commencement of internship.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Epidemiology of needlestick injury in emergency medical service personnel.

Employees of the St. Louis Emergency Medical Service (EMS) reported 44 needlestick injuries during a recent 38-month period, an incidence of 145 injuries/1,000 employee years. New employees, that is, those employed for less than a year, reported 19 (43%) of these injuries. Two employees developed clinically apparent hepatitis B during the study period. These results document a high risk to emergency medical personnel of exposure by needlestick to blood potentially infectious for hepatitis and other pathogens. EMS personnel require early and continuing educational efforts directed toward prevention of needlestick injuries and should be offered hepatitis B vaccine.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2006

Needlestick injury and accidental exposure to blood: the need for improving the hepatitis B vaccination grade among health care workers outside the hospital.

To describe the characteristics of needlestick injuries occurring to health care workers outside the hospital, a new case report form was implemented and analyzed after 12 months. A total of 144 incidents were reported. Of the needlestick injuries in nursing assistants, 84% involved an insulin needle or pen. Thirty-five percent of all health care workers and 47% of the nursing assistants were not vaccinated against hepatitis B. Hepatitis B vaccination grade in health care workers outside the hospital should be improved, in particular among nursing assistants.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗
PubMed1993

Needlestick injuries among critical care nurses before and after adoption of universal precautions or body substance isolation.

A small, self-selected sample of Canadian acute-care hospitals participated in an analysis of their critical care nurses' needle disposal practices and needlestick injury experience before and after adopting new Universal Precautions or Body Substance Isolation infection control strategies. Covert observation of disposal practices, review of employee health injury reports and direct survey of the nurses indicated that employee health records documented fewer injured nurses during a thirty-day period (2.3% of 929 nurses in 33 hospitals) than was found by surveying nurses directly (3.5% of 312 nurses in 11 hospitals; only 36% of these injuries had been documented in employee health records). Injury rates in only one of eleven hospitals indicated appreciable needlestick risk reduction after adopting Universal Precautions or Body Substance Isolation, and an association between reduced needle recapping and reduced needlestick injury was not evident. Rates of injury found in this research remain commensurate with rates reported before the era of Universal Precautions and Body Substance Isolation. These findings suggest that new strategies have not had significant impact on healthcare workers' greatest source of exposure to bloodborne pathogens.

Canada↗
PubMed1990

Estimated cost of needlestick injuries for six major needled devices.

A major factor in the introduction of new products designed to decrease the risk of needlesticks to healthcare workers (HCWs) is whether the increased expense of a safer device is offset by the savings of preventing needlesticks. The itemized costs of needlestick injuries associated with six major needled devices were estimated and compared to the cost of the devices causing the injuries, based on 1988 dollars. Included was the cost of treatment, prophylaxis and employee health department personnel time. The average cost of needlestick injury was $405, with a narrow range of $390 to $456 for different devices. As a percent of the cost of the devices, needlesticks cost as little as 10% of the cost of the device, for the intravenous (IV) catheter, to as much as 457%, for needles used to connect IV lines. On the average, needlesticks cost 36% of the devices' cost. These data may be used to weigh the potential economic benefits of safer needle technology or other strategies intended to reduce the incidence of needlesticks.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed2006

Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety device usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment.

A prospective survey was conducted over six months in order to estimate the proportion of reported occupational needlestick injuries sustained by National Health Service (NHS) Scotland staff that could have been prevented through either safety device introduction, improved guideline adherence, guideline revision or a combination of these. This survey involved the administration of a standard proforma to healthcare workers followed by an expert panel assessment. All acute and primary care NHS Scotland trusts, the Scottish Ambulance Service and the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service were included. Proforma and expert panel assessment data were available for 64% of injuries (952/1497) reported by healthcare staff. These injuries were all percutaneous. The expert panel concluded that: 56% of all injuries and 80% of venepuncture/injection administration injuries would probably/definitely have been prevented through safety device usage, 52% of all injuries and 56% of venepuncture/injection administration injuries would probably/definitely have been prevented through guideline adherence and 72% of all injuries and 88% of venepuncture/injection administration injuries would probably/definitely have been prevented through either intervention. Multi-factorial analysis indicated that injuries sustained through venepuncture/injection administration were significantly more likely to be prevented through safety device usage [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.09, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.11-8.31 and adjusted OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.64-4.45, respectively], and significantly less likely to be prevented through guideline adherence (adjusted OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.60 and adjusted OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78, respectively). Injuries sustained after completing procedures were significantly more likely to be prevented through safety device usage and guideline adherence. The study's findings support the need for improvements to staff's adherence to needlestick injury guidelines and appropriate implementation of safety devices for venepuncture and injection administration.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Hospital administrators' tolerance of staff needlestick injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To survey hospital administrators regarding their opinions of an acceptable frequency of staff needlestick injury and the frequency that would prompt additional preventive action. DESIGN: A simple anonymous questionnaire sent to 960 administrators with one reminder. Data were collected regarding hospital size and community role, whether human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients had ever been treated, presence of an infection control practitioner, estimation of the proportion of staff vaccinated against hepatitis B, and opinions as to the acceptable frequency of needlestick accidents and the accident frequency, requiring additional action. SETTING: 240 public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The executive officers, directors of medical services, directors of nursing, and safety officers of the hospitals surveyed. RESULTS: The response rate was 50%. Administrators' opinions of acceptable accident frequency increased with hospital size and (independently of size) with experience with HIV-infected patients, and with the presence of a full-time infection control practitioner. Accident frequencies judged to require additional preventive action were higher than injury frequencies regarded as acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital administrators surveyed accept staff needlestick injuries as inevitable, the more so in hospitals that have treated known HIV-infected patients and that have full-time infection control practitioners.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2003

Risk of HCV transmission after needlestick injury, and the efficacy of short-duration interferon administration to prevent HCV transmission to medical personnel.

BACKGROUND: We carried out this study to assess the risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission after needlestick injuries in medical personnel, and to evaluate the efficacy of short-duration interferon administration to prevent HCV transmission. METHODS: A total of 684 personnel who had been occupationally exposed to an anti-HCV-positive source and followed for more than 3 months were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: Of the 684 subjects, 279 (41%) were treated with 1 to 3 days of interferon either just after or 1 to 12 days after the injury. One case of HCV infection was found in each of the treated (1/279; 0.4%) and nontreated (1/405; 0.2%) groups. There was no significant difference in the transmission of HCV between the two groups. Both infected patients were treated with interferon after developing acute hepatitis, and HCV was subsequently cleared. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lower risk of HCV transmission after needlestick accident than previously reported, and short-duration interferon administration at an early stage after the needlestick injury, to prevent HCV transmission, is unnecessary.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed1994

Out of hospital needlestick injuries.

Retrospective analysis showed that 67 children had presented in Edinburgh with needlestick injuries on 70 occasions over five years. Worryingly, 10 children sustained injuries pretending to be intravenous drug abusers. Despite risks of hepatitis B and HIV infection, protection and follow up were inadequate. Publicity about discarded needles and a treatment plan for use in accident and emergency departments are recommended.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2006

[The efficacy of safety winged steel needles on needlestick injuries].

Safety winged steel needles were introduced at the University of Tokyo Hospital in January 2001. We studied their effect in needlestick injuries. A total of 952 'needlestick and sharp-object injuries were reported. From January 1999 to December 2004, Cases of injury with winged steel needles decreased dramatically soon after safety devices were introduced, from 19.8% in Apr.-Dec.2000 to 6.7% in 2001 and 5.5% in 2002 (p < .01). They began to increase, however, in July 2002, decreased again after medical staff members mere given lectures and notices by e-mail. Due to the introduction of safety devices, cases classified as a "while recapping a used needle" and "when puncturing rubber stoppers" decreased. Among 17 injuries with safety winged steel needles, the most common cases were "safety mechanism not activated". We estimated that 76.5% of cases with safety winged steel needles could be prevented if they were used properly. In conclusion, the introduction of safety winged steel needles effectively reduced cases of injury with such needles. It is thus important to regularly remind hospital staff of safety device techniques and information reduce the such injuries.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2006

Needlestick injuries and other occupational exposures to body fluids amongst employees and medical students of a German university: incidence and follow-up.

The aim of this study was to obtain data concerning the incidence, reporting and follow-up of occupational exposure to blood or other body fluids (OEB). A questionnaire was distributed to employees and medical students (N=787) and official reports of OEB during the year 2003 (N=203) and their consequent follow-up (N=100) were evaluated. The percentages of needlestick injuries were 29.5% for students and 22.5% for employees. Incidence rates per 1000 employee days were 0.61 for needlestick injuries or sharp object injuries and 0.27 for mucocutaneous exposure to body fluids. The mean rate of underreporting was approximately 45%. Contrary to expectations, only 4.3% of nurses and 3.9% of doctors officially reported an OEB in 2003. The number of persons who did not attend for a serological test increased during the follow-up period. Considering all documented test results, 35 out of 100 affected persons were lost to follow-up due to default of appearance. As a consequence, the employer should provide safety devices and enforce didactical interventions with practical training and incident reporting. Periodical occupational health medicals, including serological testing, should be mandatory for all employees, including medical students and student nurses. To increase compliance after OEB, a short follow-up period using improved laboratory tests requires further discussion.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed2000

Needlestick injuries and hepatitis B virus vaccination in health care workers.

An analysis of 2646 needlestick injuries in hospitals in the Greater Manchester area between April 1992 and April 1999 was carried out. Ten per cent of members of staff injured in these incidents had never been vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) and 27% of those who had been vaccinated had no anti-HBs (< 10 IU/L). Although few health care workers were at risk of transmission of HBV through needlestick incidents in this study (0.6% (12/2084) of all source patients were HBsAg positive; 9 HBeAg positive, 7 anti-HBe positive), the large number of members of staff who were not protected from HBV infection indicates a need for occupational health departments to reinforce HBV vaccination policies.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Prophylaxis against possible human immunodeficiency virus exposure after nonoccupational needlestick injuries or sexual assaults in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Nonoccupational human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for adults has been described, although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga, offer no specific recommendations. There is limited information about its use in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current practices of physicians in pediatric infectious disease (PID) and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) departments regarding nonoccupational HIV PEP for children and adolescents. DESIGN: Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Directors of all PID and PEM departments with fellowship programs in the United States and Canada between July and November 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General questions regarding HIV PEP and questions concerning 2 scenarios (5-year-old with a needlestick injury and a 15-year-old after sexual assault). RESULTS: The return rate was 67 (78%) of 86 for PID and 36 (75%) of 48 for PEM physicians. Fewer than 20% of physicians reported institutional policies for nonoccupational HIV PEP; 33% had ever initiated nonoccupational HIV PEP. In both scenarios, PID physicians were more likely than PEM physicians to recommend or offer HIV PEP in the first 24 hours after the incident (55 [83%] of 66 vs 20 [56%] of 36 for needlestick injuries [odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-10.1] and 47 [72%] of 65 vs 16 [50%] of 32 for sexual assault [odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.3]). Seven different antiretroviral agents in single, dual, or triple drug regimens administered for 2 to 12 weeks were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: Although few physicians reported institutional policies, and only one third had ever initiated HIV PEP, many would offer or recommend HIV PEP for children and adolescents within 24 hours after possible HIV exposure. A wide variation of regimens have been suggested. There is a need for a national consensus for nonoccupational HIV PEP.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The use of a quality-improvement approach to reduce needlestick injuries in a Saudi Arabian hospital.

OBJECTIVE/DESIGN: An increase was noted in the incidence of needlestick injuries in our institution. A retrospective study was carried out analyzing the accident reports and medical records of needle-stick injuries from January 1995 to July 1996. Study variables included monthly incidence; location; injury site; mechanism; staff vocational status; source virological status; staff immunity; and serological conversion to hepatitis B and C viruses and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). SETTING: 350-bed general hospital in Western Saudi Arabia employing 2,083 employees of many different nationalities. RESULTS: 126 injuries were identified. Thirty percent of injuries occurred in the operating room and 28% on general wards. Twenty-five injuries occurred during a surgical procedure in the operating room, 22 injuries were caused by undisposed sharps, 11 occurred during suturing, 11 occurred during injection, and 10 occurred while disposing of refuse. At least 38% of the injuries were avoidable. Sixty percent of those injured were nurses, 30% were medical staff, and 6% were housekeeping staff. Nine of the identifiable sources were hepatitis B surface antigen-positive, nine were hepatitis C antibody-positive, and none were anti-HIV positive. Eighty-nine percent of injuries involved the hands. None of our injured employees had seroconverted at 3, 6, or 9 months follow-up to HIV, hepatitis C, or hepatitis B. Eighty-four percent of injured staff were hepatitis B immune. CONCLUSION: Steps taken to reduce the future incidence of injuries included the provision of readily accessible sharps boxes, a hospitalwide education program focusing on safe handling and disposal of sharps, and the development of clear policies and procedures for dealing with sharps injuries. A further study will be conducted 12 months after the introduction of these measures.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accidental needlestick injuries in the academic setting: a model follow-up program.

Developed in response to needlestick injuries received by university nursing students, a model for initiating a comprehensive faculty and student follow-up treatment program for incidents involving blood and body fluids is presented. Providing an overview of need and risks, the authors review the program components, such as reporting mechanisms, program initiation, use of screening tests, recommended treatment modalities, and a decision-analysis for guiding the process.

Aftercare↗
PubMed2005

Short-term economic impact associated with occupational needlestick injuries among acute care nurses.

PURPOSE: Recent survey data have reported the incidence rate of needlestick injuries (NIs) and NIs which draw blood sustained by nurses caring for patients with diabetes in an in-patient hospital setting. The purpose of this study was to deduce the potential short-term annual economic impact resulting from such NI, and to project the potential national economic burden of NI among this population of health care workers (HCWs). METHODS: Data were obtained from a recently published, IRB-approved, Internet-based survey in which nurses routinely treating patients with diabetes self-reported outcomes of their experience with NI (N = 400). A micro-costing approach was adopted. Direct costs comprised post-exposure testing (PET) for infection, post-exposure health care services utilization, and NI-induced post-exposure prophylactic (PEP) drug utilization. Indirect costs were derived from missed workdays and associated lost productivity. These data were combined with data related to the national epidemiology and total incidence of NIs among HCWs and risk-associated populations to project the national burden. RESULTS: Among 400 nurses, 110 sustained at least one NI in the past year, with 73 punctures drawing blood. The ensuing total short-term costs of these NIs were calculated to range from 25,896 US dollars to 36,066 US dollars. Indirect costs accounted for 44-62% of this total cost. Average short-term costs per NI ranged from 145 to 201 US dollars, and average short-term costs of NI per injured nurse ranged from 235 to 328 US dollars. Assuming mean values from published literature on the incidence and distribution of NI among nursing populations, an annual national burden of 65 million US dollars was calculated for costs in the immediate period following NI. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest substantial economic burden immediately following NI on a national and individual hospital level occurring among acute-care nurses treating patients with diabetes. Long-term treatment costs would add to the overall economic burden.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

[HIV and dentistry. Part 2. Needlestick injury].

The risk for dentists to acquire HIV infection at work is low but not neglectable. Needlestick injuries are among the most hazardous events in this respect. Prevention of these injuries will considerably reduce the risk of occupational HIV infection in dentistry.

HIV Infections↗