Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MRSA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

MRSA revisited.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗
PubMed1994

[Questionnaires regarding MRSA in Japan].

UNLABELLED: Changes in properties of MRSA and the status of MRSA infections in the last two years were investigated by an MRSA Forum composed of 18 groups including 115 medical institutions in Japan. And an opinion poll regarding MRSA was taken by professional doctors (41) and general clinical doctors (323). Points of discussion: 1. Did properties of MRSA change? 2. Did the pattern of MRSA infections change? 3. Did the understanding of MRSA change? 4. What is the relationship between MRSA and the 3rd cephems? 5. How is MRSA related to polymicrobial infections? 6. Is ABK useful against MRSA infections? 7. What will be future trend in characteristics of MRSA and MRSA infections? CONCLUSIONS: 1. MRSA has become more resistant to methicillin however it seemed to have become less toxic. 2. Severe MRSA infections are decreasing and colonizations are increasing. 3. There were some differences in attitude against MRSA between professional doctors and general clinical doctors. 4. The 3rd cephem should be used reasonably. 5. MRSA infections should be treated with polymicrobial infections in consideration. 6. MRSA did not gain resistance against ABK and ABK is useful against MRSA infections. 7. Problems of MRSA will cool down but they should always be kept in our mind.

Aminoglycosides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nosocomial MRSA infection in vascular surgery patients: impact on patient outcome.

Although methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is a worldwide problem, data on its significance among vascular surgery patients remain scant and conflicting. This study was designed to evaluate the association between nosocomial MRSA infection and patient outcome following vascular surgery procedures. Outcomes among patients with MRSA infection were also compared to those infected with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). All patients admitted to a tertiary care Vascular Surgery ward during the year 2002 were included in this retrospective review. In addition to information on demographic and comorbid conditions, data on surgical interventions, nosocomial infection incidence rates as defined by the Center for Disease Control guidelines, and MRSA screening results were collected. Primary outcome was in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes measures included length of hospital stay, readmissions, or repeat surgeries, and ICU admissions. Of a total of 408 subjects, 110 were documented with a nosocomial infection (27.0%). Of these, 16 patients (3.9%) were colonized with MRSA on screening at time of admission, 22 (5.4%) had acquired MRSA infection during hospitalization, and 15 (3.7%) had MSSA infection. Patients with MRSA, MSSA, and non-MRSA infection had similar baseline characteristics except for hypertension and tobacco use. Age and MRSA infection were significant risk factors for in-hospital deaths (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.01 and OR 7.44, 95% CI 1.63-33.9, p = 0.01, respectively). Adjusted for the effects of age, MRSA infection remained a significant independent risk factor associated with in-hospital deaths (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.09-17.7, p = 0.04). After adjustment for baseline risk factors, MRSA infection was also independently associated with secondary outcome measures. Although risks of non-MRSA infections were also associated with adverse outcomes in the multivariate analyses, MRSA posed higher risks, as reflected by higher odds ratio in all instances. The 22 patients with documented MRSA infection had significantly longer hospital stays than those with MSSA infection (median 24 days vs 8 days, p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in terms of secondary outcome. These results show that MRSA infection is a significant risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes among patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures. Infection with MRSA results in a greater risk of these outcomes when compared with non-MRSA infection. However, despite concerns regarding the virulence of this strain of staphylococcus, patients infected with MRSA had no higher rates of morbidity or mortality except for increased length of hospital stay when compared to patients with MSSA.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

[In vitro indirect pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against anti MRSA chemotherapy].

In the patient with a chronic respiratory disease, both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are frequently detected from expectoration. Vancomycin (VCM) and arbekacin (ABK) are both recommended for the chemotherapy of MRSA infection in Japan. Minocycline (MINO) is also selected for the treatment of MRSA infection. While rifampicin (RFP) and a trimetoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination (ST) are also recommended in Europe and USA but not recommended in Japan for the chemotherapy of MRSA infection. It is pointed out that coexistence bacteria affect chemotherapy as an indirect pathogen. Not only an antibacterial action but the immunological action or the metabolic effect against chronic P. aeruginosa infection such as DPB is known by the administration of 14-membered ring macrolides including erythromycin (EM). We considered the influence of P. aeruginosa isolated with MRSA on the activity against anti-MRSA agents by the disk diffusion method with bilayer flat agar in vitro. Moreover, we also examined the influence of EM against the activity of the anti-MRSA agents when P. aeruginosa was coexistence. One strain of MRSA as an indicator strain and 100 strains of P. aeruginosa as test strains, which were obtained from clinical materials, were used for the following experiment. P. aeruginosa was streaked on to the Mueller-Hinton agar culture medium (MHA), and they incubated at 35 degrees C for 24 hours. Then, the blood agar plate was piled up, MRSA was streaked on the blood agar surface, the susceptibility test disks (VCM, ABK, MINO, RFP, ST) were put on it, and incubated at 35 degrees C for a further 24 hours. The diameter of the zone of inhibition around the susceptibility disks against MRSA was measured and compared with P. aeruginosa free experiments. The anti-MRSA activity of MINO, ST and ABK was reduced by coexistence of P. aeruginosa. In RFP and VCM, the anti-MRSA activity was reinforced by coexistence of P. aeruginosa. Although the anti-MRSA activity of ST and ABK has improved by EM addition in the MHA plates, the anti-MRSA activity has not improved in MINO. These results are suggesting that in a MRSA infection, the chemotherapy by anti-MRSA agents were affected by coexistence of P. aeruginosa as an indirect pathogen. The macrolides such as EM may be useful as a modulator for chemotherapy by ST or ABK when MRSA and P. aeruginosa are isolated at the same time from the patient.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.

Active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the strategies recommended by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America for control of nosocomial MRSA infections. Infection control and laboratory personnel desire rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive methods to enhance surveillance activities. A multicenter study was performed to evaluate a new selective and differential chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA (C-MRSA) medium (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), which enables recovery and concomitant identification of MRSA strains directly from nasal swab specimens taken from the anterior nares. Specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood agar (TSA II, BD Diagnostics). Mauve colonies on C-MRSA at 24 h and 48 h and suspicious colonies on TSA II were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus by Gram stain morphology and a coagulase test. In addition, the results of C-MRSA were compared to results of susceptibility testing (five different methods) of S. aureus strains isolated on TSA II. A total of 2,015 specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and TSA II. Three hundred fifty-four S. aureus isolates were recovered; 208 (59%) were oxacillin (methicillin) susceptible and 146 (41%) were oxacillin resistant (MRSA). On C-MRSA, 139/146 or 95.2% of MRSA isolates were recovered, whereas recovery on TSA II was 86.9% (127/146) (P = 0.0027). The overall specificity of C-MRSA was 99.7%. When C-MRSA was compared to each susceptibility testing method, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows: oxacillin MIC by broth microdilution, 94.4% and 96.7%; oxacillin screen agar, 94.3% and 96.7%; PBP2' latex agglutination, 93.7% and 98.5%; cefoxitin disk diffusion, 95.0% and 98.1%; and mecA PCR, 95.1% and 98.1%. In this study, C-MRSA was superior to TSA II for recovery of MRSA from surveillance specimens obtained from the anterior nares and was comparable to conventional, rapid, and molecular susceptibility methods for the identification of MRSA isolates.

Agar↗
PubMed2001

[A study on the transmission of MRSA among the family members including clients of visiting nurse and related infection control].

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to clarify MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) transmission among clients, receiving nursing care from visiting nurse stations, and family members, as well as to determine MRSA positive rates of visiting nurses themselves and their handwashing habits. METHODS: The subjects were 131 clients who had utilized 32 visiting nurse stations, and had tested MRSA positive in our previous study performed 2-5 months earlier. The presence of MRSA in the nasal passages was investigated in 15 of the 131 MRSA positive clients and the 24 family members who had agreed to cooperate. Antibiotic sensitivity tests of the involved strains of MRSA were conducted using 14 antibiotics to allow antibiotic resistance patterns to be compared. 148 nurses who worked at 18 visiting nurse stations were also screened for MRSA in their nasal passages. In addition, a self-administered questionnaire was filled in concerning their handwashing habits. RESULTS: Out of 15 clients from whom MRSA was isolated in the previous study, 9 became MRSA positive (60.0%), and this was the case for 6 family members, living with 4 of them. The antibiotic resistance patterns coincided among the family members of 3 families, suggesting MRSA transmission among the client and his/her family member(s). MRSA transmission was shown not to be influenced by the ADL (activities of daily living) of a client nor by the content or time of the care provided by family member(s). As for visiting nurses, MRSA was isolated from 1 out of 148 (detection rate: 0.7%). The practice rate for handwashing was 91.2% after visiting as compared to 22.1% before visiting, and 93.4% after care as compared to 37.5% before care; the differences were significant (P < 0.001). The most frequently used handwashing procedures included handwashing with soap, povidone iodine and other disinfectants. The practice rate were 94.9% in visiting nurse stations and 91.2% in clients' homes. There was no significant difference between the procedures in these settings. DISCUSSION: Family members who are living with MRSA carriers are in danger of MRSA transmission irrespective of the content of the care, suggesting the need to prevent spread into compromised hosts or the community. On the other hand, visiting nurses are seldom infected with MRSA, and transmission of MRSA from nurses to clients is a rare event. This study showed, however, a low rate of handwashing before client contact. The possibility of cross infection from the hands of visiting nurses to their clients therefore needs further study.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

MRSA in lower limb amputation and the role of antibiotic prophylaxis.

AIM: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) colonisation is reported in 3-20% of vascular patients. Many develop infective complications. MRSA is associated with poor prognosis. Aim of the study is to assess MRSA in lower limb amputation and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: Prospective study of lower limb amputation. MRSA screen and wound swabs were taken at operation. Antibiotic prophylaxis included teicoplanin (400 mg) 1 dose at operation. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent 33 primary amputations. At operation 15 legs (45%) were colonised with MRSA and 18 legs (58%) had active wound infection; MRSA (4) and other (14). Following surgery 3 patients died. Twenty-two legs (76%) had primary healing. Infection developed in 7 stumps (24%), MRSA (5) and Pseudomonas (2). Stump infection increased time to wound healing (p<0.0001). MRSA stump infection increased revision amputation (p=0.009) and duration of hospital stay (p<0.0074). MRSA wound infection at operation increased the risk of MRSA stump infection (p=0.007). Non-MRSA wound infection at operation was not associated with a worse outcome. No patient colonised with MRSA at operation developed postoperative MRSA stump infection. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA is more prevalent that previously reported. MRSA infection has a poor prognosis. Prophylaxis may be effective for patients colonised with MRSA.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Sydney, Australia: emergence of EMRSA-15, Oceania, Queensland and Western Australian MRSA strains.

AIMS: To describe clinical features and molecular epidemiology of non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. METHODS: Patients with non-multiresistant MRSA isolated from blood at South Western Area Pathology Service from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2001 were enrolled. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis, phage typing, and (selected instances) multilocus sequence and staphylococcal cassette chromosome typing was performed. PCR was used to detect Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), and enterotoxin genes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were detected: eight with UK EMRSA-15 (ST22-MRSA-IV), three with Oceania (South-West Pacific/Western Samoan phage pattern) (ST30-MRSA-IV), two with WA MRSA-5 (ST8-MRSA-IV), and one each with WA MRSA-1 (ST1-MRSA-IV), Queensland strain (ST93-MRSA-IV), and WA MRSA-15 (ST59-MRSA-IV). Prior hospital admissions occurred with six of the eight patients with UK EMRSA-15, none of the three with Oceania, and three of the five with other strains. Thirteen of 16 patients had underlying disease. Three of the three patients with Oceania strain bacteraemia were Polynesians; 11 of 13 of the others were Caucasians. PVL genes were detected in four of 16 isolates (all Oceania and Queensland strains). entC was detected in two EMRSA-15 strains; entA in one Oceania, two WA MRSA-5 and the WA MRSA-1 strain, with entA and entB in the WA MRSA-15 strain. tst was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple epidemic strains cause non-multiresistant MRSA bacteraemia. Most patients had risk factors. Oceania and Queensland strains possess the PVL gene.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

MRSA in urology: a UK hospital experience.

OBJECTIVE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection appears to be increasing, the UK has one of the worst MRSA rates in Europe. As urological patients are at high risk, the aim of this study was to determine the number of newly diagnosed cases of MRSA detected in a urology ward. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The urology department serves an annual local population of greater than 500,000 with 30 inpatient beds and a tertiary population of 1 million. Over a five year period, we retrospectively recorded all patients with a new diagnosis of MRSA. We also determined colonization site and if the diagnosis of MRSA was made in an elective surgical patient or a patient admitted as an emergency. RESULTS: The mean number of newly diagnosed cases of MRSA was 20.6 per year. The percentage of patients with a new diagnosis of MRSA was less than or equal to 1% per year with no significant difference of new cases of MRSA over five years. Emergency patients had a trend towards a mean higher rate of MRSA. The commonest site of MRSA colonization was from catheters (32%) and open wounds (18%). DISCUSSION: MRSA is of concern, as compared to methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus, because it is associated with high rates of clinically relevant infection, increased hospital stay and cost, greater mortality and high vancomycin usage. Mandatory reporting has shown a steady increase in the number of cases of MRSA infection over the past four years. We found that the number of newly diagnosed cases of MRSA was low, at less than or equal to 1% of patients per year. Furthermore, the number of new cases of MRSA remained constant over five years suggesting low acquisition rates in a busy UK urology ward.

Cross Infection↗