Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lithotripsy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Phantom experiments using electrohydraulic and pulsed dye laser lithotripsy.

To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic transcystic lithotripsy of common bile duct stones, a phantom model comprising bovine liver and biliary tract tissue integrated within a laparoscopic trainer was built. A 9 French cholangioscope was introduced via the cystic duct into the common bile duct in which a human gall stone of known composition had been introduced. Lithotripsy was performed using either a laser or electrohydraulic probe passed through the working channel of the cholangioscope following which the stone fragments were manipulated into the duodenum through the papilla of Vater using the choledochoscope. A total of 20 lithotripsies with each energy form were performed. Lithotripsy was successful in breaking the stones into fragments smaller than 6 mm. The energy expenditure was comparable with a mean of 49 J for laser lithotripsy (range 9 to 159 J), and 53 J (range 16 to 160 J) for electrohydraulic wave lithotripsy. The lithotripsy time measured from introduction of the cholangioscope until its removal was a mean of 30 minutes for electrohydraulic wave lithotripsy and 41 minutes for dye laser lithotripsy. This difference was statistically significant. Macroscopic tissue damage to the common bile duct wall was not observed following any procedure. An additional experiment was performed to evaluate damage that could be caused to the wall of the common bile duct. Both electrohydraulic shock wave and pulsed dye laser lithotripsy without optical feedback regulation caused severe tissue defects when there was tissue contact or distance less than 2 mm. With optical feedback regulation however, no tissue damage was induced by laser lithotripsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1997

[Intra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of complex lithiasis of the bile ducts. Comparison of endoscopic techniques and long-term results].

OBJECTIVES: About 2% of common bile duct stones and most intra-hepatic stones cannot be removed by conventional endoscopy. Intra-corporeal lithotripsy is an alternative technique for these patients. Contact lithotripsy can be obtained by a pulsed dye laser or by electro-hydraulic shockwaves. We compared and assessed the results of these two methods. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (79 +/- 9.8 years, 25 women and 12 men) underwent laser lithotripsy (n = 21), electro-hydraulic lithotripsy (n = 9) or both methods consecutively (n = 7) for common bile duct stones (n = 31), intra-hepatic stones (n = 3) or diffuse lithiasis (n = 3). The mean diameter of the largest stone was 23 +/- 12 mm. Lithotripsy was performed by a retrograde approach in 35 cases and a combined, retrograde and transhepatic approach in 2 cases. RESULTS: The mean number of lithotripsy sessions was 1.5 +/- 0.65. The overall success rate (free bile ducts with patent drainage) was 95%. In 2 patients, stones were not fully extracted: one underwent surgery, the other one was treated conservatively with antibiotics. The duration of the hospital stay was 9.3 +/- 4.5 days. Morbidity at 30 days was 27% and only one case of major morbidity (hemorrhage after sphincterotomy, 2.7%) was observed. There were no procedure-related mortality. Electro-hydraulic and laser groups did not differ significantly for success rate, morbidity and time spent at hospital. Follow-up information was obtained in 34 patients (91.8%) a median of 17 months after lithotripsy (range: 4.52 months). Ten patients died of non-biliary diseases. Two patients (5.8%) developed biliary symptoms 24 and 34 months after lithotripsy, one after unsuccessful lithotripsy. CONCLUSION: Intra-corporeal lithotripsy is a valuable tool for the most complex cases of duct stones, and with an acceptable morbidity. The results of the two techniques are similar. Late biliary complications after intra-corporeal lithotripsy appear to be rare.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic treatment of retained bile-duct stones by using a balloon catheter for electrohydraulic lithotripsy without cholangioscopy.

BACKGROUND: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy is a highly effective method for fragmenting biliary stones, but direct visual control is required. The efficacy and the safety of electrohydraulic lithotripsy without cholangioscopy by using a balloon catheter were evaluated in patients with bile-duct stones that could not be extracted by using standard techniques. METHODS: Nineteen patients with extrahepatic bile-duct stones that could not be extracted by using conventional endoscopic methods, e.g., mechanical lithotripsy, were selected to undergo electrohydraulic lithotripsy without peroral cholangioscopy. An electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe with a 3.0 F radio-opaque tip was inserted through a balloon catheter. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed under fluoroscopy until the fragmented stone could be captured in a large basket for mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopic removal of the fragments was attempted during the electrohydraulic lithotripsy session. RESULTS: Stones were successfully fragmented in 17 of 19 patients. In 16 patients (84.2%), the bile duct was cleared of all stones. A mean of 1.8 endoscopic sessions was required for complete removal. Additional mechanical lithotripsy was performed in 9 (56.2%) of the 16 patients. Minor complications were noted in 4 patients (2 hemobilia, 1 pancreatitis, 1 cholangitis). There was no 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: For a selected group of patients with bile-duct stones not extractable by using standard techniques, fluoroscopically controlled electrohydraulic lithotripsy with a balloon catheter seems to be an effective method of fragmentation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Ureteroscopic management of ureteral calculi: electrohydraulic versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy.

PURPOSE: This study compared electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG lithotripsy for ureteral calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of consecutive patients with ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic electrohydraulic or holmium:YAG lithotripsy were retrospectively compared. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy was done using a 1.9F fiber at energy settings between 50 and 100 v. Holmium:YAG lithotripsy was done using a 365 microm. fiber at energy settings of 0.6 to 1.5 J. RESULTS: A total of 23 and 47 consecutive patients underwent electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG lithotripsy, respectively. For preoperative calculi less than 15 mm. mean stone size plus or minus standard deviation was 9 +/- 3 versus 9 +/- 3 mm. (p = 0.5), mean operative time was 72 +/- 21 versus 102 +/- 38 minutes (p = 0.004), stone-free rate at the end of ureteroscopy was 65 versus 97 (p < 0.01) and 3-month stone-free rate was 94 versus 97% (p = 0.4) for electrohydraulic versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy. For preoperative calculi 15 mm. or greater stone size was 19 +/- 5 versus 19 +/- 4 mm. (p = 0.9), operative time was 159 +/- 61 versus 108 +/- 27 minutes (p = 0.01), stone-free rate at the end of ureteroscopy was 33 versus 87% (p = 0.001) and 3-month stone-free rate was 67 versus 100% (p = 0.02). Complications were not significantly different in either comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The overall likelihood that a patient would be rendered stone-free at ureteroscopy and 3 months after ureteroscopy favored holmium:YAG over electrohydraulic lithotripsy. For ureteral calculi less than 15 mm. electrohydraulic lithotripsy was more rapid than the holmium:YAG procedure but for ureteral calculi 15 mm. or greater the holmium:YAG technique was more rapid than electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The outcomes differences may have resulted from the different mechanisms of electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG lithotripsy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Laser lithotripsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: All literature related to laser lithotripsy published within the past year was reviewed. Salient articles have been reviewed and grouped according to safety issues, efficacy, comparison studies, biliary applications or future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no evidence of renal deterioration after holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet lithotripsy. Laser-related complications occur in less than 1%. Stone-free rates from holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet lithotripsy are greater than 90% for ureteral calculi, and 67-84% for renal calculi. This method of lithotripsy is effective for ureteral and renal calculi in morbidly obese patients who are not suitable candidates for shock-wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet lithotripsy is more effective than pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi, but no more effective than shock-wave lithotripsy (Dornier HM-3) for distal ureteral calculi. Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet lithotripsy of biliary calculi is uniformly effective. Preliminary data showed the erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser to be more efficient than holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet energy, but current erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet fibers are impractical. SUMMARY: The holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser is safe and effective. It is the lithotrite of choice for endoscopic ureteral and ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy.

Glomerular Filtration Rate↗
PubMed1999

Unenhanced computerized axial tomography to detect retained calculi after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with unenhanced computerized axial tomography (CT) after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy in patients thought to be at high risk for retained calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT was obtained in 121 patients (124 kidneys) within 12 to 36 hours of percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for staghorn or large nonstaghorn renal calculi. Cases were grouped according to the CT findings as no retained calculi, insignificant retained calculi (fragments 1 to 3 mm.), retained calculi amenable to shock wave lithotripsy and retained fragments requiring second look percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy or flexible nephroscopy. RESULTS: No calculi were seen in 73 kidneys (59%) and retained calculi were identified in 51 (41%). Shock wave lithotripsy was used to treat 8 patients and another percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy or flexible nephroscopy was performed in 23 to remove retained stones. Insignificant calculi were noted in the remaining 21 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that postoperative unenhanced CT is superior to plain renal tomography and is the best method to determine if a patient is stone-free after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. It helps to locate precisely those stones requiring a second percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy or nephroscopic extraction. An unenhanced renal CT devoid of calculi obviates routine postoperative second look flexible nephroscopy. We encourage others to consider this technique to define more accurately kidney stone status after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for large staghorn calculi or in any patient at high risk for retained calculi after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Experimental tissue lesions related to extracorporeal lithotripsy of gallbladder.

Eighteen dogs were studied to determine the presence, extent and evolution of tissue lesions related to extracorporeal lithotripsy of the gallbladder under conditions similar to those encountered in clinical practice (electrohydraulic generator, ultrasonographic localization, prone positioning and 2,500 shocks delivered per session). Twelve dogs underwent lithotripsy 14 days after implantation of a 9 to 14 millimeter human stone in the gallbladder. The dogs were sacrificed one, 14 and 28 days after lithotripsy (four dogs at each date). Two dogs underwent implantation of stone but not lithotripsy and were sacrificed 14 days later. The last four dogs received only shock wave therapy and were sacrificed one (two dogs) and 14 (two dogs) days later. All calculi were completely fragmented into pieces less than 5 millimeters. Increases in leukocyte count (11 +/- 3.7 10(9) per liter) and alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels (206 +/- 139 and 156 +/- 164 international units per deciliter, respectively) were seen after lithotripsy (p less than 0.05), but returned to normal during the next four weeks. Macroscopic hemorrhages were noted only in the dogs having undergone lithotripsy and were exclusively located in the organs lying in the path of the shock wave. Macroscopic hemorrhages were found in all six dogs sacrificed the day after lithotripsy and in two of the six dogs sacrificed 14 days later; one dog of the four sacrificed 28 days after lithotripsy still showed a large hemorrhage in the wall of the gallbladder. Microscopic abnormalities included congestion and hemorrhage of the same organs; although more discrete, congestion and hemorrhage were still present one month after shock wave therapy. Early and localized pulmonary fibrosis at the hypercellular stage was noted in two of the four dogs sacrificed at 28 days. The clinical implications for biliary lithotripsy upon humans include the necessity for intact coagulation parameters, strict avoidance of the bases of the lungs in targeting the stone and performing an ultrasonographic assessment of the wall of the gallbladder before repeating lithotripsy sessions, month apart.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of a pulsed dye laser and electrohydraulic lithotripsy on porcine gallbladder and common bile duct in vitro.

With the advent of minimal access biliary procedures there is a need for a safe intracorporal lithotripsy technique that can be used through small flexible endoscopes. Currently, the two techniques available are electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser induced shock wave lithotripsy. In this study we compare the effect of a 504 nm coumarin pulsed dye laser and electrohydraulic lithotripsy on in vitro porcine gallbladder and common bile duct. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy at the lowest energy the generator would deliver caused perforation of both tissues in only a few pulses when a 1.9-F probe was placed in direct contact with the tissue. Energy from a 504 nm coumarin pulsed dye laser delivered through a 320-microns fiber placed in light contact with the tissue caused an energy-dependent perforation after 50 pulses in from none to 44% of tissues. It was also found that there was a higher incidence of perforation in more vascular than non-vascular tissue. When the EHL probe and the laser fiber were held 1-2 mm from the tissue surface, discharge of each resulted in no perforation. On histological examination of the tissues, the perforations were found to be very small with laser lithotripsy and considerably larger with the electrohydraulic lithotripsy. It was felt that laser lithotripsy in the clinical situation was likely to be much safer than electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

PURPOSE: We compared the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with intracorporeal holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia) for proximal ureteral calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 67 patients underwent 81 primary procedures, including in situ ESWL with a DoLi 50 lithotriptor (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc.) or ureteroscopy combined with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi. RESULTS: Of the primary procedures 81 involved proximal ureteral calculi, including 35 done for calculi 1 cm. or greater. The initial stone-free rate in patients with calculi 1 cm. or greater was 93% for ureteroscopy combined with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and 50% for in situ ESWL. The efficiency quotient for treating proximal ureteral calculi 1 cm. or greater was calculated as 0.76 for ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 0.43 for ESWL. For proximal ureteral calculi less than 1 cm. the initial stone-free rate was 100% and 80% for ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and ESWL, respectively. The efficiency quotient was calculated as 0.81 for ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 0.72 for ESWL for treating proximal ureteral calculi less than 1 cm. There were no major complications in either group and all procedures were performed on an outpatient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that ureteroscopy combined with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is an acceptable treatment modality for all proximal ureteral calculi and excellent results are achieved for calculi 1 cm. or larger. Although the stone-free rate was better for smaller stones with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, efficiency quotients were similar. Therefore, ESWL should remain first line therapy for proximal ureteral calculi less than 1 cm. because of less morbidity, and a lesser anesthesia and analgesic requirement.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Hepatic cavitation. A marker of transient hepatocellular injury during biliary lithotripsy.

Sonographically visible microbubbles attributable to cavitation effects have been observed in bile (within the gallbladder), in hepatic vessels, and within the liver of patients undergoing biliary lithotripsy. Cavitation effects are believed to contribute to stone fragmentation and possibly tissue injury during lithotripsy. To study the latter, the relationship between intraparenchymal hepatic cavitation and serum transaminase activity and clinical follow-up was analyzed in 81 patients undergoing 164 lithotripsy treatments. Seventy-one treatments (43%) resulted in sonographically evident microbubbles in the liver parenchyma during lithotripsy. A temporary, yet statistically significant (P < 0.01) rise in SGOT and SGPT was observed within 2 hr of completion of lithotripsy compared to those patients without hepatic microbubbles. All but one patient had a return to pretreatment baseline levels of SGOT and SGPT by two weeks after lithotripsy. In this patient, persistent elevation of transaminases was attributed to the delayed passage of fragments and not to any sequelae from hepatic cavitation effects. Ultrasound immediately after, two weeks after, and 3-12 months after lithotripsy showed no hepatic structural abnormalities. Ursodiol administration at the time of treatment did not predispose to hepatic cavitation or elevation of transaminase. Detection of hepatic microbubbles during lithotripsy is a marker of hepatocellular injury. Their correlation with transaminase elevation refutes the contention that transaminasemia results solely from fragment passage after lithotripsy. Although not associated with recognizable structural damage or long-term sequelae, cavitation effects and transaminasemia reiterate that shockwaves are not entirely benign as they traverse parenchymal organs.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed1995

Repeated piezoelectric lithotripsy for gallstones with and without ursodeoxycholic acid dissolution: a multicenter study.

The use of bile acid dissolution therapy in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones, remains controversial. Our study examined whether chemolitholysis after sufficient disintegration enhanced stone clearance within 6 months of the first lithotripsy. A total of 143 patients who developed one to three radiolucent stones measuring < or = 30 mm in diameter were randomly separated into two treatment groups: 47% were given lithotripsy alone, and 53% lithotripsy plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Repeated piezoelectric lithotripsy was given, with no limit on the total number of treatment sessions, to pulverize or disintegrate stones into fragments < 3 mm. Stones were disintegrated in 97% of all patients, and the fragments were < or = 2 mm in 50% of these patients. According to an intention-to-treat analysis, 52% in the lithotripsy alone group and 58% in the UDCA group were free of stones 6 months after the first lithotripsy (P = 0.61). Of the patients with fragments < or = 2 mm, 71% in the former and 86% in the latter group were free of stones 6 months after the first lithotripsy, with no significant difference between the groups. Biliary pain occurred in 25% of all patients, including 3 with acute cholecystitis. We concluded that the sufficient disintegration of gallstones achieved with repeated lithotripsy enhanced the early clearance of fragments, regardless of whether chemolitholysis was employed.

Cholelithiasis↗
PubMed2006

Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is currently accepted as a first line treatment modality for urolithiasis. In obtaining informed consent it is important to inform patients of the stone-free rate with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy before surgery. The present study was performed to develop preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 435 patients with 507 urinary stones were treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a Dornier Lithotripter D. Patient age, sex, body mass index, number of stone(s) in each treatment, stone length, side and location were evaluated before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and treatment efficacies were evaluated at 3 months after each session. The treated stones were divided into 2 groups, those in cases that were stone-free with a single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy session and those in all other cases. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model. The nomograms were developed by repeating the analysis on 200 bootstrap samples. RESULTS: Stone length, location and number were identified as significant variables on multivariate analysis, and a logistic regression model was developed using these variables. The nomograms predicting stone-free rate at 3 months after single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment were finally developed from 200 bootstrap samples. In these nomograms the stone-free probability was highest for solitary proximal ureteral stones less than 5 mm in size (93.8%) and lowest for multiple caliceal stones greater than 21 mm (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that stone size, location and number are significant predictors of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcome. We have developed nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, which is useful for counseling patients with urolithiasis before surgery.

Female↗
PubMed2004

Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical lithotripsy is used to break large bile duct stones. This study investigated the predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sphincterotomy, and basket removal of stones. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed for stones of large size (>15 mm diameter) that precluded extraction intact. Success was defined as complete clearance of the duct. Various predictive factors, including size and number of stones, stone impaction, serum bilirubin, presence of cholangitis, and bile duct diameter were analyzed in relation to the success or failure of lithotripsy. RESULTS: A total of 669 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis, which was found in 401 patients. Of the latter patients, 87 had large stones that required mechanical lithotripsy. Lithotripsy was successful in 69 (79%) patients. Impaction of the stone(s) in the bile duct was the only significant factor that predicted failure of lithotripsy and consequent failure of bile duct clearance. Other factors, including stone size, were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical lithotripsy is successful in about 79% of patients with large bile duct stones. The only significant factor that predicts failure of mechanical lithotripsy is stone impaction in the bile duct.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones in cystic duct remnants and Mirizzi syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of bile duct calculi is established, there are few studies of the value of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct remnant stones and for Mirizzi syndrome. METHODS: Patients who required extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones were identified in a cohort of 239 patients with bile duct stones treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy between January 1989 and December 2001 at a single institution. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone contact. OBSERVATIONS: Six women (age range 19-85 years) underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones after failure of endoscopic treatment measures. Three of the patients presented with retained cystic duct remnant calculi (one also had Mirizzi syndrome type I), and 3 presented with Mirizzi syndrome type I. The stones were fragmented successfully by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in all patients; the fragments were extracted endoscopically in 5 patients. Endoscopy plus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was definitive treatment for all patients except one who subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones in a cystic duct remnant and in Mirizzi syndrome can be successfully treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in conjunction with endoscopic measures. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is especially useful when surgery is contraindicated.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

The role of lithotripsy and its side effects.

The relative roles of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy currently are being debated. Both treatment modalities are applicable to most upper urinary tract calculi. However, there are some important distinctions between the 2 techniques. Over-all, extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy is associated with significantly lower morbidity than percutaneous nephrostolithotomy but stone-free rates are lower for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy than for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. This difference is slight for kidneys containing minimal stone burden but increases in direct proportion to increasing stone burden. The morbidity of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy also increases with increasing stone burden. When applied to the treatment of staghorn calculi the morbidity of both techniques is comparable but the stone-free rates are significantly better with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy produces changes in the kidney similar to that of renal trauma, consisting primarily of intraparenchymal and perirenal hemorrhage and edema. While the acute effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy are well tolerated by most patients, the long-term sequela of this form of therapy is not well established. Potential long-term adverse effects reported include loss of renal function, hypertension and an increased rate of new stone occurrence. The effect of shock waves on renal parenchyma in experimental animals is dose-dependent (number of shock waves). Magnetic resonance imaging of patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy demonstrates morphological abnormalities in or around the kidney in 63 to 85 per cent of the cases (average number of shock waves 1,200). Despite these observations the safe limits of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in humans have yet to be established. Further study regarding this issue and the potential long-term adverse effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is needed urgently.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Re-auditing a regional lithotripsy service.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, in a repeat audit of a regional lithotripsy service, whether changes implemented after a regional audit in 1994 (which showed disappointing results from shock wave lithotripsy, attributable to both poor patient selection and an inadequate fixed-site lithotripter) have had any effect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A data-collection sheet was devised to gather information on the site, size and number of stones treated, together with information on the lithotripsy treatment and outcome. Patients selected for the audit were the first 50 new patients treated with lithotripsy at each centre in 1999. As only one hospital has a fixed-site lithotripsy machine, the results of mobile lithotripsy were grouped by machine for analysis. RESULTS: There was an overall improvement in patient selection from the previous audits. Few stones of > 16 mm or < 4 mm were treated. Two units treated more ureteric stones, thought to reflect first the influence of a fixed-site lithotripter, and second a willingness to insert a ureteric stent and await the next mobile lithotripter visit. The stone free rates were all disappointingly low (16.7-26.7%) but the results improved when fragments of < 4 mm were included as "successful" giving an "overall success rate" of 45.9-66.7%. The unit with a fixed-site lithotripter appeared to perform better (two-thirds successful) than the mobile machines (Modulith SLX, 51%; Modulith SLK, 46%). One centre visited by both mobile machines had a success rate of 65% but a high rate of auxiliary procedures (35% vs 16-19% vs the fixed-site). CONCLUSION: Although these results show some improvement in patient selection for our regional lithotripsy service, stone-free and success rates are poorer than those reported elsewhere. This may reflect the modern lithotripsy machines that allow day-case treatment with minimal analgesia, and confirms reports by other authors who encourage a re-examination of success rates of shock wave lithotripsy.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Benefits of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones.

PURPOSE: Although new forms of lithotripsy, such as new-generation shockwave and laser lithotripsies, have recently been developed, the optimal treatment for impacted ureteral stones (IUS) remains controversial. We investigated, retrospectively, the outcome of IUS treated with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two IUS cases were treated using ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. Of 22 stones, 8 (36%) were treated by ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy as initial treatment and 14 (64%) with pneumatic lithotripsy as an auxiliary treatment after SWL. The stone sizes ranged from 7 to 16 mm with 14 located in the proximal, 3 in the middle, and 5 in the distal ureter. RESULTS: Twenty stones (91%) were effectively fragmented by ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and eliminated within 1 month after treatment. One stone could not be observed with the ureteroscope secondary to the kinking and stricture of the ureter under the stone, and the stone moved into the kidney during the procedure. The stone was subsequently treated successfully with SWL. One other stone was first fragmented into two pieces; and one big piece, which migrated into the kidney, was treated successfully with SWL. Complications such as bleeding, ureteral injury, and perforation did not occur. Although a few small fragments migrated into the kidney during the procedure in three cases, the overall stone-free rate at 1 month after a one-session treatment with pneumatic lithotripsy was 91%. CONCLUSION: Impacted ureteral stones can be treated effectively with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy in both the short and the long term.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. An update.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has revolutionized the treatment of urinary calculi. It should be considered the treatment of choice for renal stones smaller than 2 cm and for the majority of ureteral calculi, under which circumstances success rates approaching 80 to 90 per cent may be anticipated. Larger renal calculi or impacted ureteral stones probably should be managed by endoscopic techniques with or without adjunctive intracorporeal (ultrasonic or electrohydraulic) lithotripsy or laser fragmentation. Recent modifications in lithotripter design have been focused on the development of pain-free lithotripsy. Concomitant with a decrease in power, however, is an attendant decrease in the efficiency with which stones can be fragmented, resulting in an increase in the number of lithotripsy treatments required for adequate stone fragmentation. Additionally, sonography is assuming an increasing role in stone localization, and its use will require sonographic training on the part of the urologist. Biliary lithotripsy has been promising in preliminary European studies, with success rates approaching 90 per cent. It must be noted, however, that the U.S. experience has not been as impressive. Moreover, only 20 to 30 per cent of patients referred for biliary lithotripsy appear to be optimal candidates for this new technique. Adjunctive dissolution of gallstones with chronic oral medical therapy may be required after biliary lithotripsy, and long-term follow-up studies still need to be performed. Finally, the potential deleterious effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy must always be kept in mind. Although the majority of clinical and animal investigations have documented no significant long-term alterations in renal function, care must still be exercised when performing lithotripsy with the knowledge of the potential for long-term injurious effects on the functioning renal parenchyma.

Animals↗