Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Letrozole”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Letrozole in the treatment of breast cancer.

Endocrine therapy, predominantly using the antioestrogen tamoxifen, has long been a key treatment strategy for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. An alternative approach is to treat patients with aromatase inhibitors, which suppress oestrogen biosynthesis. Letrozole, and other third-generation aromatase inhibitors, are highly specific and potent inhibitors of oestrogen production, which markedly reduce circulating oestrogen levels and whole-body aromatisation of androgen precursors after menopause. In postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or receptor-unknown breast cancer, letrozole has been shown to be superior to megestrol acetate and aminoglutethimide in second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole was also superior to tamoxifen in first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer, as well as in systemic preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. A recent adjuvant trial demonstrated significant superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in disease-free survival, and another trial demonstrated that treatment for early breast cancer with letrozole, following 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (extended adjuvant therapy), significantly improved disease-free survival compared with placebo, irrespective of nodal status. Ongoing trials will determine whether the optimal use of letrozole in the adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer is as a replacement for tamoxifen, or sequenced additionally before or after tamoxifen.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

The aromatase inhibitor letrozole increases epiphyseal growth plate height and tibial length in peripubertal male mice.

Sex hormones may influence longitudinal growth, either indirectly, by affecting the growth-hormone-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis, or directly, by affecting changes within the epiphyseal growth plate (EGP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, on longitudinal growth and changes in the EGP in vivo. Eighteen peripubertal male mice were divided into three groups. The first group was killed at baseline, the second was injected with letrozole (Femara) s.c., 2 mg/kg body weight/day, for 10 days, and the third was injected with the vehicle alone. Serum testosterone levels were found to be significantly higher in the treated group than in the controls. Letrozole induced a significant increase in body weight, tail length and serum growth hormone level, but had no significant effect on the level of serum IGF-I. On histomorphometric study, there was a significant increase (12%) in EGP height in the treated animals compared with controls. Immunohistochemistry showed a 3.4-fold letrozole-induced increase in the proliferation of the EGP chondrocytes, as estimated by the number of proliferation cell nuclear antigen-stained cells, and a decrease in the differentiation of the EGP chondrocytes, as estimated by type X collagen staining. Letrozole did not interfere with type II collagen levels. The study group also showed a twofold increase in the number of IGF-I receptor-positive cells compared with controls. In conclusion, the aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, appears to increase the linear growth potential of the EGP in mice.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy in treating postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer in Japan.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer in Japan. A Markov analytical model was developed to estimate life-year (LY) expectancies, using key transition probabilities obtained from the results of a multinational phase III trial, a literature review and a Japanese medical expert panel. Direct medical costs were estimated, from the payer's perspective, using the expected resource utilization provided by the expert panel, the medical fee table and drug tariff under the national health insurance system. The expected overall life-years (LYs) obtained were 3.68 years for letrozole arm and 3.09 years for tamoxifen arm, showing incremental LYs of 0.59 years in patients receiving letrozole. The total expected costs were 3,644,588 yen (33,133 US dollars) for letrozole arm and 3,322,111 yen (30,201 US dollars) for tamoxifen arm, resulting in a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 546,571 yen (4,969 US dollars) per life-year gained, while the 5 th percentile of ICER showed letrozole dominating tamoxifen and the 95th percentile was 2,310,593 yen (21,005 US dollars). The results suggest that letrozole is a clinically beneficial and cost-effective treatment option when compared with tamoxifen in first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in Japan.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer and estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive tumors who had completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model. METHODS: Using a Markov model, we estimated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with extended adjuvant letrozole vs no extended adjuvant therapy. Probabilities of breast cancer recurrence or new contralateral tumor adverse effects and death were estimated using data from the MA.17 study and other secondary sources. Costs (in 2004 US dollars) and quality-of-life effects (utilities) of breast cancer events and adverse effects were derived from the literature. RESULTS: In base-case analyses, extended adjuvant letrozole vs no extended adjuvant therapy results in an expected gain of 0.34 QALYs per patient (13.62 vs 13.28 QALYs), at an additional lifetime cost of 9699 dollars per patient (55,254 dollars vs 45,555 dollars). The incremental cost per QALY gained with letrozole is 28,728 dollars. Cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the assumed reduction in risk of breast cancer events with letrozole but is insensitive to the risks, costs, and quality-of-life effects of osteoporosis and hip fracture. Cost-effectiveness is less than 100,000 dollars per QALY for node-positive patients younger than 81 years and for node-negative patients younger than 73 years. CONCLUSION: For postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who have completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, the cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole is within the range of other generally accepted medical interventions in the United States.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Economic evaluation of letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of initiation of second-line hormone therapy with letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Canada, compared to megestrol acetate. METHODS: A modified Markov model, incorporating seven health states, was designed to simulate the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer from second-line hormone therapy to death. The model was constructed with data from a clinical trial, literature sources, and interviews with breast cancer treatment experts. Canadian experts provided information on resource utilization patterns and local costs were attached to these resources. The model was used to calculate mean survival time, time without progression, and total direct medical costs for patients initiating treatment with letrozole 2.5 mg or megestrol acetate 160 mg. RESULTS: The mean survival time and time without progression for letrozole 2.5 mg patients were 28.3 months and 19.0 months, respectively, compared to 25.7 months and 16.5 months for megestrol acetate 160 mg patients. Total treatment costs for both groups were similar with the letrozole 2.5 mg group costing dollar 20,068 per patient, dollar 1061 more than the megestrol acetate 160 mg group (dollar CAN, 1996). The cost-effectiveness ratio for letrozole 2.5 mg with respect to megestrol was dollar 5051 per year of life gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that this ratio was sensitive to variations in the probabilities governing disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced breast cancer patients initiating second-line hormone therapy with letrozole 2.5 mg have better clinical outcomes than patients receiving megestrol acetate 160 mg. Furthermore, this benefit comes at an acceptable cost to the Canadian health care system.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

A randomized phase II trial of two dosage levels of letrozole as third-line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: It is common practice to utilize a series of different hormonal agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women who, despite disease progression, continue to be candidates for hormonal therapy on a clinical basis. Letrozole is a new highly selective and potent aromatase inhibitor. There are limited data on third-line hormonal therapy in general, and this study was undertaken to evaluate letrozole in this context. METHODS: A randomized trial involving two independent Phase II trials of two letrozole dosage levels, 0.5 mg and 2.5 mg per day, was performed. Eligibility requirements included failure on two prior hormonal therapies and measurable or evaluable disease. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients, 46 receiving 0.5 mg and 45 receiving 2.5 mg of letrozole per day, were assessable for response. At the lower dose, 9 patients (20%) achieved an objective response; 6 patients (13%) had this documented on 2 occasions separated by 3 months. At the higher dose, 10 patients (22%) achieved a response; 8 patients (18%) had this documented on 2 occasions separated by 3 months. The median times to progression were 97 days for the lower dose and 154 days for the higher dose. Toxicity was considered acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole has definite antitumor activity as third-line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma at doses of 0.5 and 2.5 mg per day. It is an effective and generally well-tolerated hormonal agent.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2001

Effect of age and single versus multiple dose pharmacokinetics of letrozole (Femara) in breast cancer patients.

Letrozole (trademark Femara) is a new orally active, potent and selective aromatase inhibitor for the hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The pharmacokinetics of letrozole and the suppression of peripheral estrogens were studied in 28 breast cancer patients after a single dose and at steady state. The pharmacokinetics of two distinct age groups (> or =50, < or =65, N=15 and > or =70 years old, N=9) were compared. There were no significant differences in area under the curve (AUC) or terminal half-life between the two age groups neither after a single dose nor at steady state. However, when comparing steady state to single dose kinetics, half-life and AUC increased significantly by 42% (90% CI: 1.13, 1.78) and 28% (90% CI: 1.12, 1.47), respectively. This deviation from linearity was probably due to a partial saturation or auto-inhibition of the dominant metabolic clearance mechanism of letrozole. At steady state, approximately 70% of the administered dose was excreted in urine as unchanged letrozole (6.0+/-3.8%) or as the glucuronide of the major, pharmacologically inactive metabolite CGP44645 (64.2+/-22.7%). A single dose of letrozole caused suppression of serum estrogen levels close to the quantification limit of the assay. No difference between single dose suppression and suppression at steady state could be detected.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Cost-effectiveness of letrozole in the extended adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer.

Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 5 years reduces recurrence in hormone receptor positive, post-menopausal women with early breast cancer, but offers no advantage when prolonged to another 5 years, during which the risk of recurrence remains high. Treating patients, who remain disease-free after 5 years of tamoxifen, with letrozole significantly reduces recurrence, regardless of nodal status. This study evaluated the life-time cost-utility of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy in 62-year-old patients from a third-party payer perspective. A Markov model incorporated locoregional, contralateral, and metastatic recurrences. The comparator was placebo. Event rates were based on published trials. Utility values were taken from a clinical trial and published literature. Costs were obtained from published literature, provincial payment schedules, cancer agencies, and drug plans formularies. Resource use reflected Canadian treatment patterns. Robustness of the model was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Extended adjuvant letrozole therapy of a cohort consisting of 50% node-negative and 50% node-positive patients prolonged their lives on average by 0.466 years or 0.267 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an additional cost of Can$8,031 per patient, yielding an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $34,058 per QALY. Letrozole was more cost-effective in node-positive than in node-negative patients (Can$26,553 vs Can$46,049 per QALY). Results were robust to variations in age, healthcare costs, and utilities. The degree of confidence that the cost per QALY would be below Can$50,000 reached 100% for node-positive and 77% for node-negative patients. Extended adjuvant letrozole is cost-effective in both node-negative and node-positive patients having ICURs below Can$50,000/QALY.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

The evolving role of letrozole in the adjuvant setting: first results from the large, phase III, randomized trial BIG 1-98.

Tamoxifen has been a standard adjuvant therapy, despite its limited 5-year efficacy window and risk of thromboembolism and endometrial malignancy. The potent aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femara) has emerged as a viable alternative to tamoxifen for the treatment of advanced, metastatic breast cancer, as well as in the neoadjuvant and extended adjuvant settings. Here we describe the first efficacy and safety analysis of BIG 1-98, a large, randomized, independently conducted clinical trial designed specifically to assess and compare the efficacy of sequential or up-front use of letrozole and/or tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for patients with early breast cancer. The analysis reported here combined the monotherapy arms of letrozole and tamoxifen with the truncated sequential arms. Patients randomized to letrozole had a 19% reduction in the risk of a disease-free survival event (hazard ratio 0.81; P=0.003), especially reducing distant metastases (hazard ratio 0.73; P=0.0012). These results establish letrozole as part of standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer.

Aromatase Inhibitors↗
PubMed2003

Effects of letrozole on superovulation with gonadotropins in women undergoing intrauterine insemination.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of letrozole in patients undergoing superovulation with gonadotropins and IUI. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Academic teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Women younger than 40 years of age with patent fallopian tubes and infertility of more than 1 year in duration who were undergoing IUI and gonadotropin therapy. INTERVENTION(S): Gonadotropins alone administered from day 3 or a combination of letrozole, 5 mg/d on day 3 to 7, and gonadotropins starting on day 5 of the menstrual cycle. Ultrasonography was performed before initiation of treatment, on day 9 of menstrual cycle, and as required thereafter until the dominant follicle reached 18 mm in diameter. Ovulation was triggered with 10,000 IU of hCG, and IUI was performed 24 and 48 hours later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gonadotropin requirements, endometrial thickness, number of follicles, and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): All 205 IUI treatment cycles conducted from March 2001 to March 2002 were included. Gonadotropins alone were used in 145 cycles and combination therapy was used in 60 cycles. Patients cotreated with letrozole required fewer gonadotropin administrations (median difference, 300 IU [95% confidence interval (CI), 225-375 IU]), developed more follicles larger than 14 mm (median difference, 1 follicle [95% CI, 1-2 follicles), and had a thinner endometrium (median difference, 1 mm [95% CI, 0.4-1.6 mm]). The pregnancy rate did not differ between patients using gonadotropin alone and those using gonadotropin plus letrozole (20.9% vs. 21.6%). CONCLUSION(S): The addition of letrozole to gonadotropins decreases gonadotropin requirements, increases the number of pre-ovulatory follicles and decreases endometrial thickness, without a negative effect on pregnancy rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Hormonal profile and endometrial morphology in letrozole-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in ovulatory infertile patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical response and endometrial morphology during the implantation window on ovarian hyperstimulation with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in infertile ovulatory women. DESIGN: Prospective trial in infertile patients. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENT(S): Eight ovulatory infertile patient candidates for ovarian superovulation. INTERVENTION(S): Subjects were monitored in one control cycle. In the next cycle, they received letrozole 5.0 mg daily on days 3 through 7 after menses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of ovulatory follicles; dominant follicle diameter; endometrial thickness; hormonal profile of FSH, LH, E(2), A, T, and P; endometrial histological dating; and pinopode formation assessed by scanning electron microscopy. RESULT(S): Cycles stimulated with letrozole resulted in more ovulatory follicles than did natural cycles (mean +/- SD 2.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.0), which attained a greater preovulatory diameter (mean +/- SD 23.8 +/- 2.7 vs. 19.3 +/- 2.1 mm), with similar endometrial thickness at midcycle compared with spontaneous cycles. Endocrine profile of medicated cycles was characterized on day 7 by increased levels of LH (5.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.4 IU/mL), reduced E(2) (98.4 +/- 11.4 vs. 161.5 +/- 14.7 pmol/L), and elevated androgens. Preovulatory and midsecretory E(2) were similar to spontaneous cycle, and P levels during midluteal phase were significantly elevated (44.2 +/- 4.6 vs. 27.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/L). Endometrial morphology during the implantation window in letrozole-stimulated cycles was characterized by in-phase histological dating and pinopode expression on scanning electron microscopy. CONCLUSION(S): Letrozole induces moderate ovarian hyperstimulation in ovulatory infertile patients with E(2) levels similar to spontaneous cycles and higher midluteal P, leading to both a normal endometrial histology and development of pinopodes, considered to be relevant markers of endometrial receptivity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The aromatase inhibitor letrozole increases the concentration of intraovarian androgens and improves in vitro fertilization outcome in low responder patients: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment in IVF cycles on intraovarian androgens and cycle outcome. DESIGN: Observational, pilot study. SETTING: University-affiliated IVF unit. PATIENT(S): One hundred forty-seven low responder patients with a previous canceled IVF cycle; 71 patients were treated with letrozole 2.5 mg plus a high-dose FSH/hMG-antagonist regimen, and 76 patients were similarly treated but letrozole was not employed. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization treatment with an antagonist FSH/hMG protocol with or without letrozole was administered during the first 5 days of stimulation; hormones were evaluated in both serum and follicular fluid. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate; androstenedione, T, E2, and P values in serum and follicular fluid. RESULT(S): Letrozole-treated patients showed significantly higher levels of follicular fluid T and androstenedione (80.3 vs. 43.8 pg/mL and 57.9 vs. 37.4 mg/mL, respectively). Similarly, these patients had a higher number of oocytes retrieved (6.1 vs. 4.3) and a higher implantation rate (25% vs. 9.4%) despite similar doses of FSH/hMG (3,627 vs. 3,804 IU). CONCLUSION(S): Adding 2.5 mg of letrozole to a high-dose FSH/hMG antagonist protocol increases intraovarian androstenedione and T concentration and improves IVF cycle outcome in poor responder patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Use of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate combined with gonadotropins in intrauterine insemination cycles: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between letrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) in gonadotropin-combined intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. SETTING: One university hospital and two private infertility clinics. PATIENT(S): Ninety-three infertile couples eligible for superovulation and IUI. INTERVENTION(S): A letrozole dose of 2.5 mg/day (n = 66) or a CC dose of 100 mg/day (n = 27) was given on day 3-7 of the menstrual cycle, combined with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) at a dose 150 IU every other day starting on day 5. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number of mature follicles, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels, endometrial thicknesses on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): The patients' clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The number of mature follicles (3.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.6 +/- 2.4) and serum E2 levels on the day of hCG (231.0 +/- 179.8 vs. 1,371.7 +/- 750.5 pg/mL) were significantly lower in the letrozole group. No significant differences were found in endometrial thickness measured on the day of hCG or clinical pregnancy rates (18.2% vs. 25.9%). The rate of patients with serum P levels > 1.0 ng/mL on the day of hCG was significantly lower in the letrozole group (4.5% vs. 25.9%). CONCLUSION(S): Letrozole produced a comparable pregnancy rate vs. CC in gonadotropin-combined IUI cycles. Our results should be confirmed in larger populations with proper randomization.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A randomized double-blind comparison of the effects of clomiphene citrate and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on ovulatory function in normal women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ovarian follicular dynamics of cycle modification with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole compared with clomiphene citrate in normal ovulatory women. DESIGN: Randomized double-blind controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENT(S): Nineteen ovulatory female volunteers, ages 18-35 years. INTERVENTION(S): Subjects were monitored in one control cycle. Subjects then received either letrozole 2.5 mg daily or clomiphene citrate 50 mg daily on days 5-9 after menses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of mature follicles, endometrial thickness and endometrial pattern at ovulation, and follicular profiles of LH, FSH, and E(2). RESULT(S): The number of mature follicles at the LH surge in natural cycles was 1.0 with an exaggerated response seen for treatment both with clomiphene and letrozole. There was no difference in the endometrial thickness at midcycle during either the natural cycles or the medicated cycles. LH surges and spontaneous ovulation were documented in all natural and medicated cycles. When measured daily, follicular profiles of LH and FSH are similar between the groups in both the natural and medicated cycles. In the medicated cycles, clomiphene results in a significant increase in E(2) levels, while E(2) levels in letrozole-stimulated cycles appeared lower than in natural cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Transient inhibition of aromatase activity in the early follicular phase with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole results in stimulation of ovarian folliculogenesis similar to that seen with clomiphene citrate with no apparent adverse effect on endometrial thickness or pattern at midcycle.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Effect of letrozole on the lipid profile in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Hormonal therapy plays a central role in the overall treatment of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors can inhibit the aromatase enzyme system resulting in a reduction of oestrogens. Letrozole is a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor that effectively blocks aromatase activity without interfering with adrenal steroid biosynthesis. The drug can significantly reduce the levels of plasma oestrogens, which remain suppressed throughout the treatment. Data are scarce concerning the influence of these drugs on serum lipid levels. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of letrozole on the serum lipid profile in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. A total of 20 patients with breast cancer were treated with letrozole, 2.5 mg once daily. After an overnight fast, serum lipid parameters (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoproteins A1, B and E and lipoprotein (a)) were measured before treatment and at 8 and 16 weeks afterwards. A significant increase in total cholesterol (P=0.05), LDL cholesterol (P<0.01) and apolipoprotein B levels (P=0.05) in the serum, as well as in the atherogenic risk ratios total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (P<0.005) and LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (P<0.005) was noticed after letrozole treatment. We conclude that letrozole administration in postmenopausal women with breast cancer has an unfavourable effect on the serum lipid profile.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

An open randomised trial of second-line endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. comparison of the aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole.

It was previously shown that letrozole (Femara) was significantly more potent than anastrozole (Arimidex) in inhibiting aromatase activity in vitro and in inhibiting total body aromatisation in patients with breast cancer. The objective of this study was to compare letrozole (2.5 mg per day) and anastrozole (1 mg per day) as endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anti-oestrogen. This randomised, multicentre and multinational open-label phase IIIb/IV study enrolled 713 patients. Treatment was for advanced breast cancer that had progressed either during anti-oestrogen therapy or within 12 months of completing that therapy. Patients had tumours that were either positive for oestrogen and/or progesterone receptors (48%) or of unknown receptor status (52%). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints included objective response, duration of response, rate and duration of overall clinical benefit (responses and long-term stable disease), time to treatment failure, and overall survival, as well as general safety. There was no difference between the treatment arms in TTP; median times were the same for both treatments. Letrozole was significantly superior to anastrozole in the overall response rate (ORR) (19.1% versus 12.3%, P=0.013), including in predefined subgroups (receptor status-unknown, and soft-tissue- and viscera-dominant site of disease). There were no significant differences between the treatment arms in the rate of clinical benefit, median duration of response, duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure or overall survival. Both agents were well tolerated and there were no significant differences in safety. These results support previous data documenting the greater aromatase-inhibiting activity of letrozole and indicate that advanced breast cancer is more responsive to letrozole than to anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Future directions in the treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer: the RAD001 (Everolimus)-letrozole clinical program.

Therapeutics that interfere with estrogen receptor function (antiestrogens, eg, tamoxifen; aromatase inhibitors, eg, letrozole) have contributed to a dramatic reduction in breast cancer mortality; however, not all estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers respond. The mammalian target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) is emerging as an important target molecule in the treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore, activation of growth-factor signaling pathways that involve mTOR may contribute to both the failure of endocrine therapy as well as the development of resistance. RAD001 (everolimus) is a potent, orally bioavailable inhibitor of the mTOR pathway. Preclinical data show that RAD001 effectively inhibits the proliferation and growth of a number of cancer cell lines in vitro and a range of tumor types in experimental animal models of cancer. Moreover, RAD001 exhibits an antiangiogenic activity, which may also contribute to its anticancer activity. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole is a potent endocrine therapy for breast cancer that acts to inhibit the aromatization of androgens, thereby reducing plasma and tumor estrogen levels. Combining RAD001 with letrozole is a rational approach to the treatment of advanced breast cancer, offering the potential for inhibition of tumor cell growth/proliferation and angiogenesis while at the same time potentially preventing the development of letrozole resistance. Preclinical data, derived from aromatase-expressing, estrogen-receptor-positive breast tumor models, suggest a synergistic interaction between RAD001 and letrozole that results in more profound effects on proliferation and the induction of tumor cell death. Importantly, early clinical data show no pharmacokinetic interaction or increase in toxicity with combined treatment, as compared with treatment with RAD001 alone, and there is evidence of antitumor activity. Enrollment into phase II studies is presently underway.

Aromatase Inhibitors↗
PubMed2004

Hormonal therapy with letrozole for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Long-term results of a phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity of oral letrozole in women with relapsed or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were treated with letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg once a day. Patients with measurable or evaluable disease (n = 21) and those with only increasing CA 125 serum levels (n = 6) were eligible. Paraffin-fixed histological sections from tumor specimens resected at the initial laparotomy were assessed for the presence of estrogen, and progesterone receptors. RESULTS: Among the 21 patients with measurable or evaluable disease who were evaluated for response by WHO criteria, we observed one complete and two partial responses for an objective response rate of 15%. Using criteria for CA 125 response we obtained a marker response in 4 of 27 patients (15%), and the marker remained stable in 5 additional patients (18%). Letrozole treatment was generally well tolerated. No correlation was observed between tumor marker response or stabilization and either estrogen or progesterone receptor expression. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the aromatase inhibitor letrozole is an agent with some activity and limited toxicity for relapsed ovarian cancer. As we could not find any association between response and hormonal receptor expression, the underlying mechanisms of letrozole action have to be elucidated.

Adult↗