Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Interphase”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Comparison between interphase and metaphase cytogenetics in detecting chromosome 7 defects in hematological neoplasias.

Monosomy 7 (-7) is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities found in the leukemic cells of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Because patients with -7 have a poor prognosis, their identification is important for treatment planning. Conventionally, -7 is detected by the G-banding technique. This study examines the use of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) methodology to detect -7 cells in interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes. Fifteen AML or MDS patients whose leukemic cells were found to have -7 by G-banding at disease presentation were studied. In 13 of these patients, -7 could be detected in interphase by FISH using a chromosome 7-specific centromeric DNA probe. The two patients whose leukemic cells were not detectable by interphase FISH had -7 and t(1q;7p), which were detectable by FISH in metaphase using a chromosome 7-specific painting probe. Metaphase FISH was particularly useful in further defining chromosome 7 defects in cells that contained aberrant or marker chromosomes. For example, in 6 patients, chromosome 7 sequences were detectable in aberrant or marker chromosomes by metaphase FISH, but not by G-banding. These results suggest that metaphase FISH is an important adjunct to conventional cytogenetic methods for defining chromosome 7 abnormalities in AML and MDS patients. Furthermore, interphase FISH is useful for follow-up studies in patients who are found informative for the FISH study at presentation.

Chromosome Aberrations↗
PubMed1986

Removal of cellular water prevents the reformation of the interphase nucleus.

The mature snRNP (small nuclear ribonucleoprotein) particles are localized quantitatively in the interphase nucleus. Like many nuclear antigens, they distribute throughout the cytoplasm after the nuclear envelope breaks down during mitosis and then return to the newly formed daughter nuclei in early G1. Their abundance and stability and the availability of monoclonal antibodies that recognize them, make the snRNP particles a useful model system for studying the reformation of the nucleus at the completion of mitosis. A wide variety of metabolic inhibitors and alterations in normal culture conditions were investigated for their ability to interfere with the return of the snRNP particles to daughter nuclei after mitosis. None of the well-characterized cytoskeletal inhibitors, biosynthetic inhibitors, calcium antagonists, nor ionophores were effective in interfering with this return. However, the removal of cellular water by exposure of cells to hypertonic medium during mitosis blocked the reformation of the nucleus and trapped the snRNP particles in the cytoplasm. In medium of twice the normal tonicity, the function of the mitotic spindle and the cleavage furrow are inhibited, however, the cells reattach to the substratum as if returning to interphase. The chromatin stays condensed and does not form a normal interphase nucleus and the snRNP particles stay dispersed throughout the cytoplasm. This condition is reversible and after return to normal medium the nucleus reforms and the snRNP particles collect in the new nuclei. After gentle extraction of metaphase cells, about 30% of the snRNP particles are soluble, however, the remainder are associated with an insoluble remnant. These data are consistent with the notion that the snRNP particles accumulate in the nucleus due to both preferential solubility and specific binding sites in the interphase nucleus.

Biological Transport, Active↗
PubMed1995

A chromosome 21-specific cosmid cocktail for the detection of chromosome 21 aberrations in interphase nuclei.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with a 21q11-specific probe (CB21c1) consisting of three non-overlapping cosmids has been applied to interphase amniocytes of pregnancies at increased risk for fetal aneuploidy (N = 78) and to interphase lymphocytes, cultured and uncultured, of patients referred for Down syndrome (N = 19 and 28, respectively). In the uncultured amniocytes, six chromosome aberrations were detected: three cases of trisomy 21, a triploidy, a de novo 46,XX,t(21q21q), and a mosaic 46,XY/47,XY,+dic(21)(q11)/48,XY,+dic(21)(q11),+del(21)(q11). In 15 cultured and 20 uncultured blood samples, FISH correctly diagnosed trisomy 21 (full or mosaic) at the interphase level, which was confirmed in all cases by subsequent karyotyping. Because of specific and strong signals in interphase nuclei, CB21c1 appears to be a useful tool for the rapid detection of chromosome 21 abnormalities.

Amniocentesis↗
PubMed2001

Role of amniotic fluid interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in patient management.

We retrospectively reviewed 309 amniotic fluid interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses performed from October 1995 to June 1999 to assess the role of interphase FISH in the management of patients at increased risk for fetal aneuploidies. Gestational age and indications for amniocentesis, clinical interventions after FISH results, as well as interventions after final culture reports were analyzed. There were 244 (79%) normal, 50 (16%) abnormal and 15 (5%) inconclusive FISH results. There were no false-positive or false-negative results, but there were nine (3%) clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by FISH. Of the 50 women with abnormal FISH results, 26 (52%) elected to terminate the pregnancy prior to the availability of the standard chromosome analysis. In two of the fetuses with trisomy 21 no abnormalities were reported by ultrasound examination. Our experience indicates that interphase FISH results played an important role in decision making, especially for pregnancies close to 24 weeks' gestation. Standard karyotype analysis is still required for detection of chromosome abnormalities not detectable by interphase FISH techniques and for clarification of unusual or inconclusive FISH results.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1994

The kinesin-related protein Eg5 associates with both interphase and spindle microtubules during Xenopus early development.

We have examined the changing abundance and distribution of the kinesin-related protein Eg5 during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus laevis. Antibodies raised against proteins synthesized from parts of a novel Eg5 gene expressed in eggs were used for Western blotting and immunofluorescence. Eg5 protein was highly enriched in oocytes and eggs compared with other adult tissues. It accumulated during the latter stages of oogenesis and increased a further threefold during oocyte maturation. Its level then gradually declined during early development. In oocytes, eggs, and early embryos, Eg5 protein could be detected throughout the cytoplasm and in subcortical aggregates. Eg5 staining was found concentrated in meiotic and mitotic spindles, mainly toward the poles. Some Eg5 staining colocalized with microtubules in interphase cells, including the aligned subcortical microtubules in fertilized eggs implicated in the cortical rotation that specifies the dorsoventral axis. Interphase association of Eg5 with microtubules during early development was confirmed by copelleting the protein with microtubules from egg homogenates. In tadpoles and tissue culture cells, Eg5 colocalized with spindle microtubules throughout mitosis but not with interphase microtubules. These results suggest that the Eg5 microtubule motor may function in meiosis, mitosis, and interphase during early development.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Interphase cytogenetics on paraffin-embedded sections of ovary for detection of genomic constitution in a patient with Turner's syndrome and chromosomal mosaicism.

The difficulty of detecting sex chromosome mosaicism cytogenetically hinders the finding of an acceptable explanation for phenotypic-genotypic discrepancy amongst those patients. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) permits the genomic identification of patients with mosaic karyotypes in interphase nuclei by utilising an X chromosome-specific DNA probe (interphase cytogenetics). We evaluated the efficiency of interphase cytogenetics in the detection of the genomic constitution of the ovary from a patient with Turner's syndrome having mosaicism (46,XX/45,X0) previously established by blood lymphocyte karyotyping. We used a biotin-labelled alphoid repetitive sequence, pBAMX5, specific for the centromeric region of the human X chromosome. Although examination of ovarian sections and blood lymphocytes by FISH showed the presence of both 46,XX and 45,X0 cell lines, the genomic constitution of the germ cells/oocytes in ovarian primordial follicles was shown to be normal (46,XX). Our results (1) show the high applicability of interphase cytogenetics on paraffin sections, (2) indicate the possibility of genomic screening of different tissues that are otherwise not amenable to routine cytogenetic investigation and (3) offer a reliable methodological approach to defining accurate by the percentage of abnormal karyotypes in mosaicism of different organs and non-dividing tissues.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84.

The localization of chromosome 18 in human interphase nuclei is demonstrated by use of radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques with a DNA clone designated L1.84. This clone represents a distinct subpopulation of the repetitive human alphoid DNA family, located in the centric region of chromosome 18. Under stringent hybridization conditions hybridization of L1.84 is restricted to chromosome 18 and reflects the number of these chromosomes present in the nuclei, namely, two in normal diploid human cells and three in nuclei from cells with trisomy 18. Under conditions of low stringency, cross-hybridization with other subpopulations of the alphoid DNA family occurs in the centromeric regions of the whole chromosome complement, and numerous hybridization sites are detected over interphase nuclei. Detection of chromosome-specific target DNAs by non-radioactive in situ hybridization with appropriate DNA probes cloned from individual chromosomal subregions presents a rapid means of identifying directly numerical or even structural chromosome aberrations in the interphase nucleus. Present limitations and future applications of interphase cytogenetics are discussed.

Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed1998

Microinjection of antibodies to centromere protein CENP-A arrests cells in interphase but does not prevent mitosis.

Centromere protein CENP-A is a histone H3-like protein associated specifically with the centromere and represents one of the human autoantigens identified by sera taken from patients with the CREST variant of progressive systemic sclerosis. Injection of whole human autoimmune serum to the centromere into interphase cells disrupts some mitotic events. It has been assumed that this effect is due to CENP-E and CENP-C autoantigens, because of the effects of injecting monospecific sera to those proteins into culture cells. Here we have used an antibody raised against an N-terminal peptide of the human autoantigen CENP-A to determine its function in mitosis and during cell cycle progression. Affinity-purified anti-CENP-A antibodies injected into the nucleus during the early replication stages of the cell cycle caused cells to arrest in interphase before mitosis. These cells showed highly condensed small nuclei, a granular cytoplasm and loss of their division capability. On the other hand, microinjection of nocodazole-blocked HeLa cells in mitosis resulted in the typical punctate staining pattern of CENP-A for centromeres during different stages of mitosis and apparently normal cell division. This was corroborated by time-lapse imaging microscopy analysis of mid-interphase-injected cells, revealing that they undergo mitosis and divide properly. However, a significant delay throughout the progression of mitotic stages was observed. These results suggest that CENP-A is involved predominantly in an essential interphase event at the centromere before mitosis. This may include chromatin assembly at the kinetochore coordinate with late replication of satellite DNA to form an active centromere.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Factors influencing ADP-ribosylation differences between chromosomal proteins of interphase and metaphase HeLa cells.

Fundamental differences were previously discovered in the ADP-ribosylation of proteins from metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei of HeLa cells. The number of modified nonhistone species was found to be dramatically reduced for metaphase chromosomes. An investigation has therefore been made of factors which could influence, and therefore be responsible for, this change in ADP-ribosylation during the cell cycle. Modified proteins were detected by autoradiography of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels containing mitotic and interphase samples from permeabilized cells that had been incubated with [32P]NAD. Whole cells showed a difference between interphase and metaphase similar to that for isolated nuclei and chromosomes. Chromosome expansion, disruption of chromosomes or nuclei, DNA nicking, and cellular growth activity significantly changed the incorporation of 32P label. Inhibitors of protein, RNA, and DNA synthesis did not, however, greatly affect ADP-ribosylation. The pattern of labeled species was not altered by the presence of nonradioactive NAD, though the extent of labeling declined. The results were not artifactually due to the procedure used to arrest cells in mitosis. Similar results were found with Novikoff rat hepatoma cells, demonstrating that the difference between metaphase and interphase is not confined to HeLa cells.

Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose↗
PubMed1987

In situ factors affecting stability of the DNA helix in interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes.

The data from earlier cytochemical studies, in which the metachromatic fluorochrome acridine orange (AO) was used to differentially stain single vs double-stranded DNA, suggested that DNA in situ in intact metaphase chromosomes or in condensed chromatin of G0 cells is more sensitive to denaturation, induced by heat or acid, than DNA in decondensed chromatin of interphase nuclei. Present studies show that, indeed, DNA in permeabilized metaphase cells, in contrast to cells in interphase, when exposed to buffers of low pH (1.5-2.8) becomes digestible with the single-strand-specific S1 or mung bean nucleases. A variety of extraction procedures and enzymatic treatments provided evidence that the presence of histones, HMG proteins, and S-S bonds in chromatin, as well as phosphorylation or poly(ADP)ribosylation of chromatin proteins, can be excluded as a factor responsible for the differential sensitivity of metaphase vs interphase DNA to denaturation. Cell treatment with NaCl at a concentration of 1.2 N and above abolished the difference between interphase and mitotic cells, rendering DNA in mitotic cells less sensitive to denaturation; such treatment also resulted in decondensation of chromatin visible by microscopy. The present data indicate that structural proteins extractable with greater than or equal to 1.2 N NaCl may be involved in anchoring DNA to the nuclear matrix or chromosome scaffold and may be responsible for maintaining a high degree of chromatin compaction in situ, such as that observed in metaphase chromosomes or in G0 cells. Following dissociation of histones, the high spatial density of the charged DNA polymer may induce topological strain on the double helix, thus decreasing its local stability; this can be detected by metachromatic staining of DNA with AO or digestion with single-strand-specific nucleases.

Acridine Orange↗
PubMed1989

Double in situ hybridization in combination with digital image analysis: a new approach to study interphase chromosome topography.

Double in situ hybridization with mercurated and biotinylated chromosome specific DNA probes in combination with digital image analysis provides a new approach to compare the distribution of homologous and nonhomologous chromosome targets within individual interphase nuclei. Here we have used two DNA probes representing tandemly repeated sequences specific for the constitutive heterochromatin of the human chromosomes 1 and 15, respectively, and studied the relative arrangements of these chromosome targets in interphase nuclei of human lymphocytes, amniotic fluid cells, and fibroblasts, cultivated in vitro. We have developed a 2D-image analysis approach which allows the rapid evaluation of large numbers of interphase nuclei. Models to test for a random versus nonrandom distribution of chromosome segments are discussed taking into account the three-dimensional origin of the evaluated 2D-distribution. In all three human diploid cell types the measurements of target-target and target-center distances in the 2D-nuclear image revealed that the labeled segments of the two chromosomes 15 were distributed both significantly closer to each other and closer to the center of the nuclear image than the labeled chromosome 1 segments. This result can be explained by the association of nucleolus organizer regions on the short arm of chromosome 15 with nucleoli located more centrally in these nuclei and does not provide evidence for a homologous association per se. In contrast, evaluation of the interphase positioning of the two chromosome 1 segments fits the random expectation in amniotic fluid and fibroblast cells, while in experiments using lymphocytes a slight excess of larger distances between these homologous targets was occasionally observed. 2D-distances between the labeled chromosome 1 and 15 segments showed a large variability in their relative positioning. In conclusion our data do not support the idea of a strict and permanent association of these homologous and nonhomologous targets in the cell types studied so far.

Cell Nucleolus↗
PubMed1984

Analysis of transferrin recycling in mitotic and interphase HeLa cells by quantitative fluorescence microscopy.

Recent findings suggest that membrane vesicle transport during mitosis may be generally inhibited. To test this, we examined the kinetics of uptake and exocytosis of RITC-transferrin in mitotic and interphase HeLa cells. We used quantitative image-intensification fluorescence microscopy to analyze the content of ligands in single cells. This technique was validated by comparison of 3H or RITC-transferrin release from interphase cells determined by microscopy or radiometry. Both methods gave a t1/2 of release of 5-6 min. The uptake of RITC-transferrin was depressed in mitotics. More importantly, we monitored the exocytosis of label during mitosis. Labeled mitotics were obtained by the progression of interphase cells into mitosis during a 50 min incubation with RITC-transferrin. After 30 min chase with unlabeled transferrin, the intensities of interphase cells approached background, whereas those of mitotic cells remained nearly constant. Thus both exocytosis and endocytosis of transferrin were exocytosis and endocytosis of transferrin were blocked during mitosis.

Fluorescent Dyes↗
PubMed1995

Interphase cytogenetics of the t(8;21)(q22;q22) associated with acute myelogenous leukemia by two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization.

In the translocation (8;21)(q22;q22) associated with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), part of the long arm of chromosome 8 is reciprocally translocated onto chromosome 21. At the molecular level the translocation results in the fusion of the 5' region of the AML1 gene on chromosome 21 and almost the entire CDR gene (also ETO or MTG8) on chromosome 8. The translocation can be demonstrated by techniques such as Southern blot analysis of DNA and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of mRNA. Neither of these methods demonstrates the translocation in individual cells. To detect the translocation at the single cell level, we used two probes, a cosmid clone containing the first five exons of AML1 and a P1 clone containing the entire CDR gene. Hybridization of the two probes to the distal and proximal side of the translocation breakpoint on chromosome 8 was expected to highlight the 8q-derivative in an interphase cell. To demonstrate the ability to identify the translocation in interphase cells using two-color FISH, these two probes were hybridized simultaneously to the Kasumi-1 cell line containing the 8;21 translocation and to t(8;21)-positive leukemic cells from a patient. Each probe was detected with a different color so that their relationship in the sample could be determined within the same interphase cell. Simultaneous hybridization of the CDR and AML1 probes to interphase cells resulted in one red and one green hybridization signal randomly located in the cell, from the hybridization to the normal chromosomes (8, 21), and one red-green pair of signals from the close hybridization of the two probes to the fusion gene on the derivative 8q-chromosome, indicating the translocation. This technique may be a useful complement for the analysis of the t(8;21), since critical information can be obtained from samples not suited for RT-PCR and conventional cytogenetic techniques. In addition, it may be useful for the assessment of minimal residual disease where RT-PCR is of limited value.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21↗
PubMed1991

A new system for high-resolution DNA sequence mapping interphase pronuclei.

Cosmid clones containing human or hamster inserts have been hybridized in situ and localized with fluorescent reporter molecules in interphase nuclei (pronuclei) obtained after fusion of hamster eggs with either human or hamster sperm. Hamster egg cytoplasm processes the tightly packaged sperm DNA into large diffuse networks of chromatin fiber bundles, providing hybridization targets more extended than those available in somatic interphase cell nuclei. Pronuclear physical distances between hybridization signals were measured in micrometers and correlated to genomic distances determined by restriction fragment analyses, using cosmids from the Chinese hamster DHFR region and from the human Factor VIII/color vision pigment gene region (Xq28). The mean pronuclear distances between hybridization sites were about three times as large as those measured in somatic interphase cells for equivalent genomic distances. The relationship between physical and genomic distances was linear from less than 50 kb to at least 800 kb. The results show that physical distance in the sperm-egg system promises to extend the mapping range obtainable in somatic interphase nuclei below 50 kb and up to at least 800 kb.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Phosphorylation of the major Drosophila lamin in vivo: site identification during both M-phase (meiosis) and interphase by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.

Phosphorylation can have profound effects on the properties of nuclear lamins. For instance, phosphorylation of specific sites on mammalian lamins drastically alters their propensity to polymerize. Relatively little is known about the effects of phosphorylation during interphase and about phosphorylation of invertebrate nuclear lamins. Here, using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, we determined the phosphorylation sites of both interphase and M-phase isoforms of nuclear lamin Dm from Drosophila melanogaster. Interphase lamins are phosphorylated at three sites: two of these sites (Ser25 and a site located between residues 430 and 438) flank the alpha-helical rod domain, whereas the third site (Ser595) is located close to the C-terminus. The M-phase lamin isoform is phosphorylated predominantly at Ser45, a residue contained within a sequence matching the consensus site for phosphorylation by cdc2 kinase. Our study confirms the important role in vivo for cdc2 kinase in M-phase disassembly of nuclear lamins and provides the basis for understanding Drosophila lamin phosphorylation during interphase.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Interphase FISH analysis of sex-mismatched BMT utilizing dual color XY probes.

Interphase FISH analysis, utilizing dual color XY probes, was performed on 27 patients following allogeneic sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation and on 31 controls. Of the 123 167 examined interphase nuclei, 63 318 were from 19 of the 21 patients (54 specimens) who engrafted, 31 827 from five of the six patients (29 specimens) who relapsed (four) or failed to engraft (one) and 24 703 from the 31 control specimens. In patients who engrafted, the mean percentage of host cells was 0.26% between day 29 and 5 years following BMT. Microchimerism of 0.7% or less than 1-5 years following BMT was not predictive of relapse. Interphase FISH analysis predicted relapse or failure of engraftment in five of the six evaluable patients. In three of five patients both conventional cytogenetics and interphase FISH of bone marrow cells provided important information regarding engraftment status and degree of chimerism.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of peripheral blood interphase cytogenetics with bone marrow karyotype analysis in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.

In a prospective study of 42 patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) interphase cytogenetics and PB CD34 enumeration were performed concomitantly with BM karyotype analysis. Interphase cytogenetics was performed with a panel of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes that were capable of detecting most of the known recurrent cytogenetic lesions in MMM. There was a close concordance in the results of interphase cytogenetics between PB and BM, regardless of the PB CD34 count. In general, FISH-detectable abnormalities were also detected by BM karyotype. Although complementary, interphase cytogenetics may not always provide the necessary karyotypic information in MMM.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Proteins recognized by antibodies against isolated cytological heterochromatin from rat liver cells change their localization between cell species and between stages of mitosis (interphase vs metaphase).

Heterochromatin in the cell nucleus seems to concentrate various proteins, such as Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1, which maintain the repressed state of gene expression. However, it still remains obscure how protein composition related to chromatin structure is different between heterochromatin and euchromatin in interphase nuclei. We isolated cytological heterochromatin from sonicated interphase nuclei obtained from rat liver cells and prepared antisera against it. The dense heterochromatic bodies seen in the preparation of intact nuclei were duplicated in a relatively pure form during the preparation of heterochromatin. In the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis, differences between the fractions of heterochromatin and euchromatin were noted by their protein composition. Isolated heterochromatin was then digested by DNase after partial digestion with trypsin and its dense structure changed to become highly sensitive to DNase. The prepared antibodies reacted with the heterochromatin region of rat liver cell nuclei and isolated cytological heterochromatin; however, they did not react with euchromatin. Using immunohistochemistry, the antibodies bound to each cell nucleus in all tissues observed; some cell types were distinguished by their differential stainability (e.g. staining in the cytoplasm). Staining of the mitotic cells showed that the proteins recognized by the antibodies were localized in the cytoplasm and, in part, on the chromosomes. Based on the results of molecular cloning from rat liver cDNA library using the antibodies as a probe, it seemed that the antibodies mainly recognized two proteins similar to arginase and general vesicular transport factor p115, respectively. The results obtained from these experiments reveal that some proteins located in the heterochromatin of interphase liver cell nuclei seem to play important roles in condensing a portion of the chromatin structure during interphase and suggest that proteins composing heterochromatin might be changed according to cell types or the stage of the cell cycle.

Animals↗