Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Femoral Nerve”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

77 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

RFC1 Repeat Expansions in Chronic Idiopathic Axonal Polyneuropathy: Prevalence, Phenotype, and Diagnostic Implications.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) accounts for approximately 20%-30% of adult-onset axonal polyneuropathies. Pathogenic RFC1 repeat expansions have emerged as a frequent cause of idiopathic sensory neuropathy, but their recognition in routine clinical practice may be challenging, particularly in the presence of potentially confounding comorbidities. We aimed to determine the prevalence of pathogenic RFC1 repeat expansions in a well-defined CIAP cohort, characterize the associated clinical and electrophysiological phenotype, and evaluate whether coexisting well-controlled diabetes mellitus (DM) or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) may hinder recognition of RFC1-related neuropathy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of adult patients with CIAP followed at a tertiary neuromuscular unit. All patients underwent RFC1 genetic testing. Clinical and electrophysiological features were compared between RFC1+ and RFC1- patients in the full cohort and after exclusion of patients with DM or MGUS. RESULTS: Ninety patients met CIAP criteria and were analyzed. Twenty-four (27%) carried biallelic pathogenic AAGGG repeat expansions in RFC1, of whom 6 (25%) had coexisting DM or MGUS. Compared with RFC1- patients, RFC1+ individuals more frequently exhibited dysautonomic symptoms, unsteadiness, history of falls, need for walking support, chronic cough, impaired vibration sense in the upper limbs and up to the knees in the lower limbs, brisk upper-limb reflexes, mild cerebellar signs, an abnormal head-impulse test, and a positive Romberg's test. Most of these differences persisted after exclusion of DM or MGUS. Electrophysiological studies in RFC1+ patients showed widespread sensory nerve involvement, including the upper limbs, with relative motor sparing, whereas RFC1- patients exhibited a more typical length-dependent pattern. INTERPRETATION: Biallelic AAGGG repeat expansions in RFC1 were identified in 27% of patients with CIAP. Specific clinical and electrophysiological features may help distinguish RFC1-related disease from other forms of CIAP and identify candidates for genetic testing, even in the presence of potentially confounding comorbidities such as well-controlled DM or MGUS.

Humans

The radiographic effect of cage subsidence on neuroforamina after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of cage subsidence on neuroforaminal area after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilizing computed tomography (CT). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Restoration of disc height via implantation of an interbody device provides an indirect decompression of the cervical neuroforamina. Interbody cage subsidence is a potential postoperative occurrence, but the effect of this on neuroforaminal area has yet to be characterized. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent one- to four-levels of ACDF utilizing an interbody device with anterior plating. Cage subsidence, neuroforaminal area, height and width were measured on CT scans preoperatively and at least 6&#xa0;months postoperatively. Levels with a cumulative sum of cranial and caudal subsidence greater than 4&#xa0;mm were classified as severely subsided, while levels with cumulative subsidence less than 4&#xa0;mm were classified as non-severely subsided. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients (151 levels) were included in this retrospective analysis. Average endplate subsidence was 3.2&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;1.9&#xa0;mm. Non-severely subsided levels demonstrated a greater perioperative increase in neuroforaminal area (7.9 vs 2.1&#xa0;mm2, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001), neuroforaminal height (1.1 vs 0.4&#xa0;mm, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) and neuroforaminal width (0.7 vs 0.1&#xa0;mm, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) compared to severely subsided levels. Interbody subsidence significantly predicted a decreased change in neuroforaminal height, width and area (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). Severe subsidence was associated with an increased rate of pseudarthrosis, but similar reoperation rates and recurrent neurologic deficits between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Severe subsidence of interbody cages after an ACDF was associated with a decreased perioperative change in neuroforaminal dimensions. This decrease in the size of the neuroforamen may reduce the effect of indirect decompression of the nerve root.

Humans

Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy present therapeutic challenges owing to comorbidities and medication-related risks. Long-term pharmacotherapy and surgical interventions are often suboptimal, necessitating evaluation of optimized pulsed radiofrequency strategies under image guidance. OBJECTIVES: This superiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency (HVP-PRF) versus conventional pulsed radiofrequency (C-PRF) for pain management in elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: This single-center, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 60-85 years with cervical radiculopathy, randomly assigned (1:1) to HVP-PRF (70 V) or C-PRF (45 V). Procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance with sensory/motor stimulation confirmation and temperature &#x2264;42&#xb0;C. The primary outcome was change in upper-limb radiating pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (&#x394;NRS) from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), neck pain NRS, Patient Global Impression of Change, responder rates, rescue analgesia use, and adverse events. Follow-up occurred at 1 week, 1, and 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were randomized and 101 received treatment. At 3 months, HVP-PRF demonstrated significantly greater radiating pain improvement versus C-PRF (adjusted mean difference 1.24, 95% CI 0.46-2.02, P=0.002). Functional improvement (NDI) was superior in the HVP-PRF group at 3 months (AMD 6.47, 95% CI 2.11-10.83, P=0.004). Responder rates (&#x2265;50% pain reduction) were higher with HVP-PRF at 3 months (68.75% vs. 42.22%, OR 3.01, P=0.011) and 6 months (65.22% vs. 43.18%, OR 2.52, P=0.035). Rescue analgesic use was lower in the HVP-PRF group during 1-3 months intervals (both P<0.05). Adverse event rates were comparable (27.45% vs. 32.00%). CONCLUSION: Under ultrasound visualization and electrical stimulation-based target confirmation with temperature control &#x2264;42&#xb0;C, HVP-PRF provided greater and more durable relief of upper limb radiating pain compared with C-PRF in elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy, with a comparable safety profile.

Humans

Low-Dose Perineural Dexamethasone Enhances Analgesia After Pediatric Hand Surgery Without Elevating Systemic Stress Markers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a widely used technique for upper limb surgery in children. Although perineural dexamethasone has demonstrated efficacy in prolonging analgesia in adults, data on its optimal dosing and systemic safety in pediatric patients are limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether low-dose perineural dexamethasone can prolong postoperative analgesia without increasing systemic stress markers in young children undergoing hand or wrist surgery. METHODS: In this triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06086392), 90 children aged 3 months to 6 years undergoing elective upper extremity surgery were assigned to receive supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.2% ropivacaine combined with either normal saline (control), dexamethasone 0.05&#xa0;mg/kg, or dexamethasone 0.1&#xa0;mg/kg. The primary outcome was time from arrival in the postanesthesia care unit to first administration of rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity using the FLACC scale, blood glucose levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and time to motor recovery. RESULTS: Both dexamethasone groups demonstrated significantly prolonged time to first opioid use compared with the control group (mean&#xb1;SD: 19.4&#xb1;2.2&#xa0;h in the 0.1&#xa0;mg/kg group, 16.0&#xb1;1.9&#xa0;h in the 0.05&#xa0;mg/kg group, and 8.5&#xb1;1.3&#xa0;h in controls; P <0.0001). Total opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the dexamethasone groups. Postoperative pain scores were lower in both intervention groups, especially during the first 12 hours. No significant differences were found among groups in blood glucose, inflammatory markers, or incidence of nerve deficits. Motor recovery was delayed in the dexamethasone groups but did not interfere with early mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose perineural dexamethasone (0.05 to 0.1&#xa0;mg/kg) safely and effectively prolongs postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid needs in children undergoing upper limb surgery, without causing systemic metabolic or inflammatory disturbances. The 0.05&#xa0;mg/kg dose may offer a more favorable balance between analgesic efficacy and motor recovery time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-randomized controlled trial.

Humans

Astigmatic vector outcomes after FS-LASIK versus SMILE for high myopic astigmatism: a single-center retrospective comparative cohort study without cyclotorsion compensation.

PURPOSE: To compare astigmatic correction vector outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE, also termed Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction, KLEx) without intraoperative cyclotorsion compensation in patients with high myopic astigmatism (-&#x2009;2.00 to&#x2009;-&#x2009;3.75 D), and to clarify procedure-specific correction tendencies under this non-standardized alignment protocol. METHODS: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study enrolled 155 eyes (one eye randomly selected per patient) that underwent FS-LASIK (80 eyes) or SMILE/KLEx (75 eyes) for high myopic astigmatism correction from January 2023 to July 2024 in Beijing Fenglian Jiayue Lige Clinic. Intraoperative cyclotorsion compensation was intentionally disabled to isolate inherent procedural astigmatism correction characteristics. Standardized Alpins vectorial analysis was performed at 3&#xa0;months and 12&#xa0;months postoperatively. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: 12-month Alpins correction index (CI). Multivariable propensity score adjustment was applied to mitigate confounding by clinical treatment selection bias. Statistical multiplicity control was implemented for secondary vector and visual outcomes. RESULTS: Baseline demographic, refractive, corneal and ocular biometric parameters were balanced between groups after propensity matching. No statistically significant intergroup differences were detected in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), residual cylinder, safety index or efficacy index at 3 and 12&#xa0;months (all P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). Under the non-cyclotorsion-compensated protocol, significant intergroup differences were identified in the magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), correction index (CI), and magnitude error (ME) at both follow-up timepoints (all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001). Target induced astigmatism (TIA), difference vector (DV), index of success (IOS), and angle error (AE) magnitudes were comparable between groups (all P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). The vector mean axis of DV differed significantly between groups at 3 and 12&#xa0;months (Watson-Williams circular test, all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001). No reoperations were documented in clinic medical records for either cohort. No standardized dry eye questionnaires, tear film testing or corneal nerve density metrics were collected to quantify dry eye adverse events; only unstructured clinical notes were reviewed for complication screening. CONCLUSIONS: Under surgical alignment without cyclotorsion compensation, FS-LASIK and SMILE/KLEx both yielded acceptable visual and refractive safety/efficacy for high myopic astigmatism (-&#x2009;2.00 to&#x2009;-&#x2009;3.75 D) at 1-year follow-up, but demonstrated divergent astigmatism correction tendencies: FS-LASIK exhibited relative astigmatism overcorrection (vector mean DV:&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.35&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;0.43 D&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;91&#xb0;, CI&#x2009;>&#x2009;1), while SMILE/KLEx showed relative undercorrection (vector mean DV:&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.21&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;0.53 D&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;12&#xb0;, CI&#x2009;<&#x2009;1). These correction biases are specific to the study's manual limbal alignment protocol without cyclotorsion tracking and cannot be generalized to modern optimized surgical platforms equipped with automated cyclotorsion compensation. Residual refractive errors across both groups are likely multifactorial, including differential corneal stromal healing responses, divergent femtosecond/excimer laser tissue modification mechanisms, and uncorrected intraoperative ocular cyclotorsion.

Humans