Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Factor For Inversion Stimulation Protein”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Escherichia coli response to hydrogen peroxide: a role for DNA supercoiling, topoisomerase I and Fis.

Bacterial cells respond to the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species by inducing the expression of antioxidant defence genes. Here we show that treatment with hydrogen peroxide leads to a transient decrease in DNA negative supercoiling. We also report that hydrogen peroxide activates topA P1 promoter expression. The peroxide-dependent topA P1 activation is independent of oxyR, but is mediated by Fis. This nucleoid-associated protein binds to the promoter region of topA. We also show that a fis deficient mutant strain is extremely sensitive to hydrogen peroxide. Our results suggest that topA activation by Fis is an important component of the Escherichia coli response to oxidative stress.

Base Sequence↗

Roles for Fis and YafK in biofilm formation by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli.

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) forms thick biofilms on the intestinal mucosa. Here, we show that most EAEC strains form a biofilm on glass or plastic surfaces when grown in cell culture medium with high sugar and osmolarity. Biofilm-forming ability in two prototype EAEC strains required aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF), although many other EAEC strains that do not express AAF also developed biofilms under these conditions. Ten thousand transposon mutants of EAEC strain 042 were isolated, and 100 were found to be deficient in biofilm formation. Of these, 93 were either deficient in in vitro growth or mapped to genes known to be required for AAF/II expression. Of the seven remaining insertions, five mapped to one of two unsuspected loci. Two insertions involved the E. coli chromosomal fis gene, a DNA-binding protein that is involved in growth phase-dependent regulation. Using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), we determined that the effect of fis was at the level of transcription of the AAF/II activator aggR. Biofilm formation also required the product of the yafK gene, which is predicted to encode a secreted 28 kDa protein. The yafK product is required for transcription of AAF/II-encoding genes. Our data do not suggest a role for type 1 fimbriae or motility in biofilm formation. EAEC appears to form a novel biofilm, which may be mediated solely by AAF and may reflect its interactions with the intestinal mucosa.

Adhesins, Escherichia coli↗

Regulation of crp transcription by oscillation between distinct nucleoprotein complexes.

FIS belongs to the group of small abundant DNA-binding proteins of Escherichia coli. We recently demonstrated that, in vivo, FIS regulates the expression of several genes needed for catabolism of sugars and nucleic acids, a majority of which are also transcriptionally regulated by cAMP-cAMP-receptor protein (CRP) complex. Here we provide evidence that FIS represses transcription of the crp gene both in vivo and in vitro. Employing crp promoter-lacZ fusions, we demonstrate that both FIS and cAMP-CRP are required to keep the crp promoter in a repressed state. We have identified in the crp promoter other transcription initiation sites which are located 73, 79 and 80 bp downstream from the previously mapped start site. Two CRP- and several FIS-binding sites with different affinities are located in the crp promoter region, one of them overlapping the downstream transcription initiation sites. We show that initiation of transcription at the crp promoter is affected by the composition of nucleoprotein complexes resulting from the outcome of competition between proteins for overlapping binding sites. Our results suggest that the control of crp transcription is achieved by oscillation in the composition of these regulatory nucleoprotein complexes in response to the physiological state of the cell.

Base Sequence↗

Association of nucleoid proteins with coding and non-coding segments of the Escherichia coli genome.

The Escherichia coli chromosome is condensed into an ill-defined structure known as the nucleoid. Nucleoid-associated DNA-binding proteins are involved in maintaining this structure and in mediating chromosome compaction. We have exploited chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-density microarrays to study the binding of three such proteins, FIS, H-NS and IHF, across the E.coli genome in vivo. Our results show that the distribution of these proteins is biased to intergenic parts of the genome, and that the binding profiles overlap. Hence some targets are associated with combinations of bound FIS, H-NS and IHF. In addition, many regions associated with FIS and H-NS are also associated with RNA polymerase.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The effect of host-encoded nucleoid proteins on transposition: H-NS influences targeting of both IS903 and Tn10.

Nucleoid proteins are small, abundant, DNA-binding proteins that profoundly affect the local and global structure of the chromosome, and play a major role in gene regulation. Although several of these proteins have been shown to enhance assembly of transpososomes before initiating transposition, no systematic survey has been carried out examining the in vivo role(s) of these proteins in transposition. We have examined the requirement of the six most abundant nucleoid proteins in transposition for three different transposons, IS903, Tn10 and Tn552. Most notably, H-NS was required for efficient transposition of all three elements in a papillation assay, suggesting a general role for H-NS in bacterial transposition. Further studies indicated that H-NS was exerting its effect on target capture. Targeting preferences for IS903 into the Escherichia coli chromosome were dramatically altered in the absence of H-NS. In addition, the alterations observed in the IS903 target profile emphasized the important role that H-NS plays in chromosome organization. A defect in target capture was also inferred for Tn10, as an excised transposon fragment, a precursor to target capture, accumulated in in vivo induction assays. Furthermore, a transposase mutant that is known to increase target DNA bending and to relax target specificity eliminated this block to target capture. Together, these results imply a role for H-NS in target capture, either by providing regions of DNA more accessible to transposition or by stabilizing transpososome binding to captured targets immediately before strand transfer.

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins↗

Preponderance of Fis-binding sites in the R6K gamma origin and the curious effect of the penicillin resistance marker on replication of this origin in the absence of Fis.

Fis protein is shown here to bind to 10 sites in the gamma origin of plasmid R6K. The Fis-binding sites overlap all the previously identified binding sites in the gamma origin for the plasmid-encoded pi initiator protein and three host-encoded proteins, DnaA, integration host factor, and RNA polymerase. However, the requirement of Fis for R6K replication depends on the use of copy-up pi-protein variants and, oddly, the antibiotic resistance marker on the plasmid. In Fis-deficient cells, copy-up pi variants cannot drive replication of R6K gamma-origin plasmids carrying the bla gene encoding resistance to penicillin (Penr) but can drive replication of plasmids with the same origin but carrying the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene encoding chloramphenicol resistance (Cmr). In contrast, R6K replication driven by wild-type pi is unaffected by the antibiotic resistance marker in the absence of Fis protein. Individually, none of these elements (copy-up pi, Fis deficiency, or drug markers) prevents R6K replication. The replication defect is not caused by penicillin in the medium or runaway replication and is unaffected by the orientation of the bla gene relative to the origin. Replication remains inhibited when part of the bla coding segment is deleted but the bla promoter is left intact. However, replication is restored by insertion of transcriptional terminators on either side of the gamma origin, suggesting that excess transcription from the bla gene may inactivate replication driven by pi copy-up mutants in the absence of Fis. This study suggests that vector sequences such as drug markers may not be inconsequential in replication studies, as is generally assumed.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Fis binding in the dnaA operon promoter region.

The region between the rpmH and dnaA genes contains five promoters that divergently express the ribosomal protein L34 and the proteins of the dnaA operon, including DnaA, the beta clamp of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, and RecF. The DNA-binding protein Fis was shown by the band shift assay to bind near the rpmHp2 and dnaAp2 promoters and by DNase I footprinting to bind to a single site in the dnaAp2 promoter overlapping the -35 and spacer sequences. There were no observable differences in Fis affinity or the angle of bending induced by Fis between methylated and unmethylated DNA fragments containing the Fis binding site in the dnaAp2 promoter. Fis directly or indirectly represses the expression of DnaA protein and the beta clamp of DNA polymerase III. A fis null mutant containing a dnaA-lacZ in-frame fusion had twofold greater beta-galactosidase activity than a fis wild-type strain, and induced expression of Fis eliminated the increase in activity of the fusion protein. A two- to threefold increase in the levels of DnaA and beta clamp proteins was found in a fis null mutant by immunoblot gel analysis.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Factor for inversion stimulation-dependent growth rate regulation of serine and threonine tRNA species.

We have previously shown that the accumulation of 20 tRNA species in Escherichia coli is individually regulated as a function of cellular growth rate. We have also reported that the growth rate regulation of some but not all tRNA species is dependent on the activity of the factor for inversion stimulation (FIS). In present work, we studied the growth rate regulation of the serine- and threonine-accepting tRNA families. We show that the levels of tRNA(3Thr), tRNA(3Ser), tRNA(2Thr), tRNA(3Thr), and tRNA(4Thr) are reduced in fis cells as the growth rate increases. The accumulation of these tRNA species is reduced 2-5-fold at the fastest bacterial growth rate. The strongest effect is observed for the two minor tRNA species; tRNA(2Ser) and tRNA(2Thr). In contrast, we find that the accumulation of tRNA(1Ser), tRNA(5Ser), and tRNA(1Thr) is similar in wild type and fis bacteria. The data presented provide further evidence for the suggestion that FIS is a stimulating factor that is involved, directly or indirectly, in the high expression level of some tRNA genes at fast bacterial growth rates.

Base Sequence↗

FIS-dependent trans activation of stable RNA operons of Escherichia coli under various growth conditions.

In Escherichia coli transcription of the tRNA operon thrU (tufB) and the rRNA operon rrnB is trans-activated by the protein FIS. This protein, which stimulates the inversion of various viral DNA segments, binds specifically to a cis-acting sequence (designated UAS) upstream of the promoter of thrU (tufB) and the P1 promoter of the rrnB operon. There are indications that this type of regulation is representative for the regulation of more stable RNA operons. In the present investigation we have studied UAS-dependent transcription activation of the thrU (tufB) operon in the presence and absence of FIS during a normal bacterial growth cycle and after a nutritional shift-up. In early log phase the expression of the operon rises steeply in wild-type cells, whereafter it declines. Concomitantly, a peak of the cellular FIS concentration is observed. Cells in the stationary phase are depleted of FIS. The rather abrupt increase of transcription activation depends on the nutritional quality of the medium. It is not seen in minimal medium. After a shift from minimal to rich medium, a peak of transcription activation and of FIS concentration is measured. This peak gets higher as the medium gets more strongly enriched. We conclude that a correlation between changes of the UAS-dependent activation of the thrU (tufB) operon and changes of the cellular FIS concentration under a variety of experimental conditions exists. This correlation strongly suggests that the production of FIS responds to environmental signals, thereby trans-activating the operon. Cells unable to produce FIS (fis cells) also show an increase of operon transcription in the early log phase and after a nutritional shift-up, albeit less pronounced than that wild-type cells. Presumably it is controlled by the ribosome feedback regulatory system. cis activation of the operon by the upstream activator sequence is apparent in the absence of FIS. This activation is constant throughout the entire growth cycle and is independent of nutritional factors. The well-known growth rate-dependent control, displayed by exponentially growing cells studied under various nutritional conditions, is governed by two regulatory mechanisms: repression, presumably by ribosome feedback inhibition, and stimulation by trans activation. FIS allows very fast bacterial growth.

Carrier Proteins↗

FIS activates sequential steps during transcription initiation at a stable RNA promoter.

FIS (factor for inversion stimulation) is a small dimeric DNA-bending protein which both stimulates DNA inversion and activates transcription at stable RNA promoters in Escherichia coli. Both these processes involve the initial formation of a complex nucleoprotein assembly followed by local DNA untwisting at a specific site. We have demonstrated previously that at the tyrT promoter three FIS dimers are required to form a nucleoprotein complex with RNA polymerase. We now show that this complex is structurally dynamic and that FIS, uniquely for a prokaryotic transcriptional activator, facilitates sequential steps in the initiation process, enabling efficient polymerase recruitment, untwisting of DNA at the transcription startpoint and finally the escape of polymerase from the promoter. Activation of all these steps requires that the three FIS dimers bind in helical register. We suggest that FIS acts by stabilizing a DNA microloop whose topology is coupled to the local topological transitions generated during the initiation of transcription.

Carrier Proteins↗

DNA binding and bending are necessary but not sufficient for Fis-dependent activation of rrnB P1.

The Escherichia coli Fis protein binds to three sites in the upstream activation region of the rrnB P1 promoter and enhances transcription 5- to 10-fold in vivo. In this report, we investigate the mechanism of Fis-dependent activation of transcription. We show that stimulation of rrnB P1 transcription by Fis can occur on linear DNA templates and does not require DNA upstream of the promoter-proximal Fis site I. Mutants of Fis defective for Hin-mediated recombination have been isolated previously and have defined an N-terminal domain required for DNA inversion by Hin in addition to the C-terminal domain which is required for DNA binding. Several of these mutants were found to be defective in stimulation of rrnB P1 transcription in vivo and in vitro. Activation-defective mutants fall into three classes: those that fail to bind to the upstream activation region, those that bind but fail to bend the DNA normally, and those that bind and bend but still fail to activate transcription. We conclude that it is unlikely that Fis functions by simply bringing upstream sequences or bound factors into the proximity of RNA polymerase to activate transcription. Rather, the data are most easily interpreted in terms of transcription activation by direct interactions between Fis and RNA polymerase, requiring precise positioning of the two proteins facilitated by bending of the DNA binding site.

Carrier Proteins↗

The N-terminal part of the E.coli DNA binding protein FIS is essential for stimulating site-specific DNA inversion but is not required for specific DNA binding.

FIS protein is involved in several different cellular processes stimulating site-specific recombination in phages Mu and lambda as well as transcription of stable RNA operons in E.coli. We have performed a mutational analysis of fis and provide genetic and biochemical evidence that a truncated version of FIS lacking the N-terminal region is sufficient for specific DNA binding and for stimulating lambda excision. These mutants also retain their ability to autoregulate fis gene expression. Such mutant proteins, however, cannot stimulate the enhancer dependent DNA inversion reaction.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Mechanism of chromosome compaction and looping by the Escherichia coli nucleoid protein Fis.

Fis, the most abundant DNA-binding protein in Escherichia coli during rapid growth, has been suspected to play an important role in defining nucleoid structure. Using bulk-phase and single-DNA molecule experiments, we analyze the structural consequences of non-specific binding by Fis to DNA. Fis binds DNA in a largely sequence-neutral fashion at nanomolar concentrations, resulting in mild compaction under applied force due to DNA bending. With increasing concentration, Fis first coats DNA to form an ordered array with one Fis dimer bound per 21 bp and then abruptly shifts to forming a higher-order Fis-DNA filament, referred to as a low-mobility complex (LMC). The LMC initially contains two Fis dimers per 21 bp of DNA, but additional Fis dimers assemble into the LMC as the concentration is increased further. These complexes, formed at or above 1 microM Fis, are able to collapse large DNA molecules via stabilization of DNA loops. The opening and closing of loops on single DNA molecules can be followed in real time as abrupt jumps in DNA extension. Formation of loop-stabilizing complexes is sensitive to high ionic strength, even under conditions where DNA bending-compaction is unaltered. Analyses of mutants indicate that Fis-mediated DNA looping does not involve tertiary or quaternary changes in the Fis dimer structure but that a number of surface-exposed residues located both within and outside the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding region are critical. These results suggest that Fis may play a role in vivo as a domain barrier element by organizing DNA loops within the E. coli chromosome.

Chromosomes, Bacterial↗

Two types of localization of the DNA-binding proteins within the Escherichia coli nucleoid.

BACKGROUND: The genome DNA of Escherichia coli is folded into the nucleosome-like structure, often called a nucleoid, by the binding of several DNA-binding proteins. We previously determined the specificity and affinity of DNA-binding for 12 species of the E. coli DNA-binding protein, and their intracellular concentrations at various growth phases. The intracellular localization of these proteins in E. coli could be predicted from these data, but no attempt has been made thus far to directly observe the intracellular distribution of the DNA-binding proteins. RESULTS: The intracellular localization in Escherichia coli of 10 species of the nucleoid-associated protein, three components of the transcripton apparatus, and three components of the translation machinery was investigated by indirect immuno-fluorescence microscopy. The DNA-binding proteins could be classified into two groups. The group-I proteins, including the major nucleoid-structural proteins, H-NS, HU, IHF, StpA and Dps, are distributed uniformly within the entire nucleoid. In contrast, the group-II proteins, which are presumed to possess regulatory activities of DNA functions accumulate at specific loci within the nucleoid, forming 2 (SeqA), 3-4 (CbpA and CbpB) and 6-10 (Fis and IciA) immuno-stained dots. Each immuno-stained dot may represent either the association of a hundred to one thousand molecules of each DNA-binding protein at a specific locus of the genome DNA or the assembly of protein-associated DNA segments from different domains of the folded genome. Both the RNA polymerase core enzyme and the sigma70 subunit are mainly associated with the nucleoid, but the anti-sigma70 factor (Rsd) appears to be accumulated at the boundary between the nucleoid and the cytosol in the stationary-phase cells. Here we show that the majority of Hfq is present in cytoplasm together with ribosomal proteins L7/L12 and RMF. CONCLUSION: The DNA-binding proteins of E. coli could be classified into two groups. One group proteins was distributed uniformly within the nucleoid, but the other group of proteins showed an irregular distribution, forming immuno-stained spots or clumps.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Promoter protection by a transcription factor acting as a local topological homeostat.

Binding of the Escherichia coli global transcription factor FIS to the upstream activating sequence (UAS) of stable RNA promoters activates transcription on the outgrowth of cells from stationary phase. Paradoxically, while these promoters require negative supercoiling of DNA for optimal activity, FIS counteracts the increase of negative superhelical density by DNA gyrase. We demonstrate that binding of FIS at the UAS protects the rrnA P1 promoter from inactivation at suboptimal superhelical densities. This effect is correlated with FIS-dependent constraint of writhe and facilitated untwisting of promoter DNA. We infer that FIS maintains stable RNA transcription by stabilizing local writhe in the UAS. These results suggest a novel mechanism of transcriptional regulation by a transcription factor acting as a local topological homeostat.

Aminocoumarins↗

DksA is required for growth phase-dependent regulation, growth rate-dependent control, and stringent control of fis expression in Escherichia coli.

DksA is a critical transcription factor in Escherichia coli that binds to RNA polymerase and potentiates control of rRNA promoters and certain amino acid promoters. Given the kinetic similarities between rRNA promoters and the fis promoter (Pfis), we investigated the possibility that DksA might also control transcription from Pfis. We show that the absence of dksA extends transcription from Pfis well into the late logarithmic and stationary growth phases, demonstrating the importance of DksA for growth phase-dependent regulation of fis. We also show that transcription from Pfis increases with steady-state growth rate and that dksA is absolutely required for this regulation. In addition, both DksA and ppGpp are required for inhibition of Pfis promoter activity following amino acid starvation, and these factors act directly and synergistically to negatively control Pfis transcription in vitro. DksA decreases the half-life of the intrinsically short-lived fis promoter-RNA polymerase complex and increases its sensitivity to the concentration of CTP, the predominant initiating nucleotide triphosphate for this promoter. This work extends our understanding of the multiple factors controlling fis expression and demonstrates the generality of the DksA requirement for regulation of kinetically similar promoters.

Cytidine Triphosphate↗

Regulation of HU alpha and HU beta by CRP and FIS in Escherichia coli.

The dimeric histone-like protein HU, one of the most abundant DNA binding proteins of Escherichia coli, is encoded by two closely related but unlinked genes, hupA and hupB. Overproduction of one or the other of the subunits has been shown to induce the SOS response and mucoidy. To understand how the synthesis of this protein is coordinated, we studied the transcription control of the two hup genes. We show here that CRP stimulated the transcription of both genes. In contrast, the FIS protein, one of the major positive regulators of the stable RNA operons, stimulated the transcription of the hupA gene, whereas it repressed that of the hupB gene. Moreover, stringent control, which like FIS also regulates the transcription of the stable RNA operons, affected the hupB transcription while it had no effect on hupA. This opposite regulation of the transcription of the two HU genes is reflected at the protein level signifying that changes in the composition of HU occur upon changes in the environment. It is rather unexpected that such divergent transcriptional regulation controls the two genes encoding a dimeric protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Identification and characterization of the fis operon in enteric bacteria.

The small DNA binding protein Fis is involved in several different biological processes in Escherichia coli. It has been shown to stimulate DNA inversion reactions mediated by the Hin family of recombinases, stimulate integration and excision of phage lambda genome, regulate the transcription of several different genes including those of stable RNA operons, and regulate the initiation of DNA replication at oriC. fis has also been isolated from Salmonella typhimurium, and the genomic sequence of Haemophilus influenzae reveals its presence in this bacteria. This work extends the characterization of fis to other organisms. Very similar fis operon structures were identified in the enteric bacteria Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Erwinia carotovora, and Proteus vulgaris but not in several nonenteric bacteria. We found that the deduced amino acid sequences for Fis are 100% identical in K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, E. coli, and S. typhimurium and 96 to 98% identical when E. carotovora and P. vulgaris Fis are considered. The deduced amino acid sequence for H. influenzae Fis is about 80% identical and 90% similar to Fis in enteric bacteria. However, in spite of these similarities, the E. carotovora, P. vulgaris, and H. influenzae Fis proteins are not functionally identical. An open reading frame (ORF1) preceding fis in E. coli is also found in all these bacteria, and their deduced amino acid sequences are also very similar. The sequence preceding ORF1 in the enteric bacteria showed a very strong similarity to the E. coli fis P region from -53 to +27 and the region around -116 containing an ihf binding site. Both beta-galactosidase assays and primer extension assays showed that these regions function as promoters in vivo and are subject to growth phase-dependent regulation. However, their promoter strengths vary, as do their responses to Fis autoregulation and integration host factor stimulation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗