Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defibrillators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Comparison of a unipolar defibrillation system with a dual lead system using an enlarged defibrillation anode.

The unipolar system for transvenous defibrillation, consisting of a single right ventricular lead as the cathode and the device shell as anode, has been shown to combine low defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) and simple implantation techniques. We compared the defibrillation efficacy of this system with the defibrillation efficacy of a dual lead system with a 12-cm long defibrillation anode placed in the left subclavian vein. The data of 38 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed. The implantation of an active can system was attempted in 20 patients (group 1), and of the dual lead system in 18 patients (group 2). Both groups had comparable demographic data, cardiac disease, ventricular function, or clinical arrhythmia. The criterion for successful implantation was a DFT of < or = 24 J. This criterion was met in all 18 patients of group 2. The active can system could not be inserted in 3 of the 20 group 1 patients because of a DFT > 24 J. In these patients, the implantation of one (n = 2) or two (n = 1) additional transvenous leads was necessary to achieve a DFT < or = 24 J. The DFTs of the 17 successfully implanted group 1 patients were not significantly different from the 18 patients in group 2 (12.3 +/- 5.7 J vs 10.8 +/- 4.8 J). The defibrillation impedance was similar in both groups (50.1 +/- 6.1 omega vs 48.9 +/- 5.2 omega). In group 1, both operation duration (66.8 +/- 17 min vs 80.8 +/- 11 min; P < 0.05) and fluoroscopy time (3.3 +/- 2.1 min vs 5.7 +/- 2.9 min; P < 0.05) were significantly shorter. Thus, the active can system allows reliable transvenous defibrillation and a marked reduction of operation duration and fluoroscopy time. The dual lead system, with an increased surface area defibrillation anode, seems to be a promising alternative for active can failures.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1998

Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold.

Even with the use of biphasic shocks, up to 5% of patients need an additional subcutaneous lead to obtain a defibrillation safety margin of at least 10 J. The number of patients requiring additional subcutaneous leads may even increase, because recent generation devices have a < 34 J maximum output in order to decrease their size. In 20 consecutive patients, a single element subcutaneous array lead was implanted in addition to a transvenous lead system consisting of a right ventricular (RV) and a vena cava superior lead using a single infraclavicular incision. The RV lead acted as the cathode; the subcutaneous lead and the lead in the subclavian vein acted as the anode. The biphasic defibrillation threshold was determined using a binary search protocol. Patients were randomized as to whether to start them with the transvenous lead configuration or the combination of the transvenous lead and the subcutaneous lead. In addition, a simplified assessment of the defibrillation field was performed by determining the interelectrode area for the transvenous lead only and the transvenous lead in combination with the subcutaneous lead from a biplane chest X ray. The intraoperative defibrillation threshold was reconfirmed after 1 week, after 3 months, and after 12 months. The mean defibrillation threshold with the additional subcutaneous lead was significantly (P = 0.0001) lower (5.7 +/- 2.9 J) than for the transvenous lead system (9.5 +/- 4.6 J). With the subcutaneous lead, the impedance of the high voltage circuit decreased from 48.9 +/- 7.4 omega to 39.2 +/- 5.0 omega. In the frontal plane, the interelectrode area increased by 11.3% +/- 5.5% (P < 0.0001) and in the lateral plane by 29.5% +/- 12.4% (P < 0.0001). The defibrillation threshold did not increase during follow-up. Complications with the subcutaneous electrode were not observed during a follow-up of 15.8 +/- 2 months. The single finger array lead is useful in order to lower the defibrillation threshold and can be used in order to lower the defibrillation threshold.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads: effect of transvenous electrode polarity on defibrillation threshold.

INTRODUCTION: The defibrillation threshold (DFT) of a transvenous-subcutaneous electrode configuration is sometimes unacceptably high. To obtain a DFT with a sufficient safety margin, the defibrillation field can be modified by repositioning the electrodes or more easily by a change of electrode polarity. In a prospective randomized cross-over study, the effect of transvenous electrode polarity on DFT was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 21 patients receiving transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads, the DFT was determined intraoperatively for two electrode configurations. Two monophasic defibrillation pulses were delivered in sequential mode between either the right ventricular (RV) electrode as common cathode and the superior vena cava (SVC) and subcutaneous electrodes as anodes (configuration I) or the SVC electrode as common cathode and the RV and subcutaneous electrodes as anodes (configuration II). In each patient, both electrode configurations were used alternately with declining energies (25, 15, 10, 5, 2 J) until failure of defibrillation occurred. The DFT did not differ between both configurations (18.3 +/- 8.2 J vs 18.9 +/- 8.9 J; P = 0.72). Eleven patients had the same DFT with both electrode configurations, 5 patients a lower DFT with the RV electrode as cathode, and 5 patients a lower DFT with the SVC as cathode. Four patients had a sufficiently low DFT (< or = 25 J) with only 1 of the 2 configurations. CONCLUSION: A change of electrode polarity of transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation electrodes may result in effective defibrillation if the first electrode polarity tested fails to defibrillate. In general, neither the RV electrode nor the SVC electrode is superior if used as a common cathode in combination with a subcutaneous anodal chest patch.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A prospective randomized evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator size on unipolar defibrillation system efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The active can unipolar implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been shown to defibrillate efficiently, but its current 80-cc size limits use in the pectoral position in many patients. Decreasing can size will facilitate pectoral insertion and will soon be feasible as an inevitable consequence of technological advancements. However, decreasing the can size has the potential to compromise unipolar defibrillation efficacy. It is the purpose of this study, therefore, to prospectively and randomly compare unipolar defibrillation efficacy with 80-cc, 60-cc, and 40-cc can sizes in patients immediately before ICD surgery in anticipation of advances in technology that will make smaller ICDs possible. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent prospective, randomized evaluation of the effect of ICD can size on defibrillation efficacy during standard ICD surgery. Each patient had the unipolar defibrillation threshold (DFT) measured with 80-cc, 60-cc, or 40-cc active can placed in the left subcutaneous infraclavicular region. The system included a 10.5F tripolar right ventricular electrode that served as the shock anode. The shock waveform used in each instance was a single capacitor biphasic 65% pulse delivered from a 120-microF capacitor. Stored energy at the DFT for the 80-cc, 60-cc, and 40-cc cans were 8.1 +/- 4.7 J, 8.7 +/- 5.8 J, and 9.5 +/- 4.8 J, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between the DFTs for the three unipolar can electrodes (P = 39). Leading edge voltage also did not differ significantly among the three unipolar cans (356 +/- 92 V, 365 +/- 110 V, and 387 +/- 94 V, respectively, P = .29). There was, however, a slight progressive increase in resistance with decreasing can size (57 +/- 7 omega, 60 +/- 9 omega, and 65 +/- 9 omega, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing can volume from 80 cc to 60 cc to 40 cc does not compromise unipolar defibrillation efficacy despite a slight rise in shock resistance. These findings indicate that technological advances that allow for smaller-volume ICDs will not compromise defibrillation efficacy for unipolar systems.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed2006

The use of automated external defibrillators and public access defibrillators in the mountains: official guidelines of the international commission for mountain emergency medicine ICAR-MEDCOM.

In this article we propose guidelines for rational use of automated external defibrillators and public access defibrillators in the mountains. In cases of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, early defibrillation is the most effective therapy. Easy access to mountainous areas permits visitation by persons with high risks for sudden cardiac death, and medical trials show the benefit of exercising in moderate altitude. The introduction of public access defibrillators in popular areas in the mountains may lead to a reduction of fatal outcome of cardiac arrest. Public access defibrillators should be placed with priority in popular ski areas, in busy mountain huts and restaurants, at mass-participation events, and in remote but often-visited locations that do not have medical coverage. Automated external defibrillators should be available to first-responder groups and mountain-rescue teams. It is important that people know how to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation and how to use public access defibrillators and automated external defibrillators.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed1994

[The effect of the impulse form of the defibrillation shock on its effectiveness and device technology of the implantable cardiac defibrillator].

Efforts have been focussed on the development of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems that reduce the size of the devices, simplify the methods of electrode implantation, and increase device longevity. The size of implantable units is predominantly determined by the capacitors and batteries, and this is dependent on the output energy requirements. The energy required for defibrillation and therefore the size of the devices can be reduced by utilizing optimal lead systems and waveforms. This report describes our experience with various shock waveforms in 86 consecutive patients undergoing implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator with a nonthoracotomy approach. Table 1 provides information on the demographic characteristics of the study population, the various shock waveforms and lead configurations tested. In 20 patients, a bidirectional lead configuration was tested using simultaneous and sequential monophasic waveforms. In 18 patients, simultaneous monophasic and biphasic waveforms with a fixed pulse duration of 6.3 ms were employed utilizing a bidirectional lead system. In 31 patients, a undirectional lead configuration was used, and simultaneous monophasic and biphasic shocks with a constant tilt were delivered. In 17 patients, the defibrillation efficacy of biphasic and triphasic shock waveforms with a fixed pulse duration of 10 ms was evaluated. The study design was an open, randomized and prospective evaluation in all patients. Defibrillation threshold was determined in a randomized sequence using a step down protocol. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest energy required for effective defibrillation on two occasions. In the 20 patients using a bidirectional lead configuration, there was no significant difference in defibrillation energy requirements between simultaneous and sequential monophasic shock waveforms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Intraoperative comparison of sequential-pulse and single-pulse defibrillation in candidates for automatic implantable defibrillators.

Sixteen survivors of cardiac arrest underwent intraoperative comparison of the effectiveness of sequential-pulse and single-pulse defibrillation. Defibrillation was tested alternately with the single-pulse or sequential-pulse technique 10 seconds into an episode of ventricular fibrillation that was induced with alternating current. The sequential-pulse defibrillation technique using truncated exponential pulses was performed with a right ventricular endocardial catheter and a left ventricular epicardial patch electrode. The first pulse was delivered between the right ventricular apical and the superior vena caval electrode on the right ventricular endocardial catheter. The second pulse was delivered between the right ventricular apical electrode and the left ventricular patch electrode 0.2 ms after termination of the first pulse. Single-pulse defibrillation was performed with a standard intracardiac defibrillation system in which a single truncated exponential pulse was delivered across 2 epicardial patch electrodes positioned over the anterolateral right ventricle and the posterolateral left ventricle. During defibrillation threshold determination, voltage and current waveforms were recorded and integrated to determine delivered energy. Average defibrillation threshold leading-edge voltage for the sequential pulse technique was 496 +/- 140 V, compared with 365 +/- 157 V for the single-pulse technique (p less than 0.005). Defibrillation threshold leading-edge current for the sequential-pulse technique was 6.0 +/- 2.3 A, compared with 10.6 +/- 5.1 A for the single-pulse method (p less than 0.0005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1991

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: effect of patch polarity on defibrillation threshold.

An automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) was implanted in 40 patients with sudden cardiac arrest (n = 29), sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 10) or recurrent syncope (n = 1) who were unsuitable for direct ablative surgery or had had unsuccessful medical therapy. The effect of patch electrode polarity on the defibrillation threshold was prospectively evaluated. Two large epicardial patches were used. Initial polarity was selected at random. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by direct current and a preestablished defibrillation protocol employed to assess the minimal energy that would reproducibly defibrillate the heart. Nineteen patients had a lower defibrillation threshold with the inferior left ventricular patch as an anode and nine patients had a lower defibrillation threshold with this patch as a cathode. In general, the defibrillation threshold was lower when this patch was used as an anode than when it was used as a cathode (18 +/- 10 versus 22.6 +/- 12.2 J; p less than 0.01). No preoperative variable predicted optimal polarity. Therefore, the effect of patch polarity on defibrillation threshold should be assessed in each patient at the time of AICD implantation so that the safety margin for satisfactory device function can be maximized.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that endocardial atrial defibrillation, using lead configurations specifically designed for ventricular defibrillation, is feasible but the substantial patient discomfort might prevent the widespread use of the technique unless significant improvements in shock tolerability are achieved. It has been suggested that the peak voltage or the peak current but not the total energy delivered determines the patient pain perception and therefore, lower defibrillating voltage and current achieved with modifications in lead and waveforms may increase shock tolerability. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect, on the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT), of the addition of a patch electrode (mimicking the can electrode) to the right ventricle (RV)-superior vena cava (SVC) lead configuration. The influence of capacitor size on ADFT using the RV-SVC+skin patch configuration was also assessed. METHODS: In 10 patients (pts) (Group 1) cardioversion thresholds were evaluated using biphasic shocks in two different configurations: 1) right ventricle (RV) to superior vena cava (SVC); 2) RV to SVC+skin patch. In a second group of twelve patients (Group 2) atrial defibrillation thresholds of biphasic waveforms that differed with the total capacitance (90 or 170 microF) were assessed using the RV to SVC+skin patch configuration. RESULTS: In Group 1 AF was terminated in 10/10 pts (100 %) with both configurations. There was no significant difference in delivered energy at the defibrillation threshold between the two configurations (7.1 +/- 5.1 J vs 7.1 +/- 2.6 J; p < 0.05). In group 2 AF was terminated in 12/12 pts (100%) with both waveforms. The 170 microF waveform provided a significantly lower defibrillating voltage (323.7 +/- 74.6 V vs 380 +/- 70.2 V; p < 0.03) and current (8.1 +/- 2.7 A vs 10.0 +/- 2.3 A; p < 0.04) than the 90 microF waveform. All pts, in both groups, perceived the shock of the lowest energy tested (180 V) as painful or uncomfortable. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a patch electrode to the RV-SVC lead configuration does not reduce the ADFT. Shocks from larger capacitors defibrillate with lower voltage and current but pts still perceive low energy subthreshold shocks as painful or uncomfortable.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Defibrillation and the geometry of the heart: a novel measurement with implications for defibrillation mechanisms.

We present a novel measurement for studying defibrillation mechanisms: the time course of changes in the size of the left ventricular (LV) cavity within 500 ms following defibrillation. Mechanical changes can be linked to electrical mechanisms via an understanding of excitation-contraction coupling. Eight mongrel dogs were internally defibrillated 5-50 seconds (including backup shocks) after the onset of 20 ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes per animal. Two dimensional, short axis, LV cavity, ultrasound images were recorded at 30 frames per second just prior to inducing VF, during defibrillation and following the shock. Each frame was individually analysed to yield the LV cavity area as a function of time. Defibrillation shocks were followed by a highly reproducible phenomenon: (1) a dramatic and rapid increase in LV area, (2) a more or less prominent LV area plateau and (3) a decrease in the LV area. The peak fractional area increase ranged from 1.65 to 4.64 times larger than the baseline (LV area just prior to defibrillation), averaging 2.18 +/- 0.686. Successful shocks took significantly longer (p < 0.01) to return to 1.3 times the baseline (407 +/- 209 ms) than unsuccessful shocks (296 +/- 130 ms). Extrapolating to electrical mechanisms, our novel measurement demonstrates that defibrillation causes immediate relaxation and therefore suggests a significant role for deexcitation in defibrillation.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Thoracotomy elevates the defibrillation threshold and modifies the defibrillation dose-response curve.

INTRODUCTION: Despite innovations in nonthoracotomy defibrillation systems, thoracotomies are still required in some clinical settings and are utilized in many animal-based research protocols. The effect of a thoracotomy on defibrillation energy, however, has not been well characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten dogs in the immediate testing group underwent defibrillation testing immediately following a thoracotomy; another ten dogs in the delayed testing group were given 48 to 72 hours of recovery before defibrillation testing. A right ventricular endocardial coil to cutaneous thoracic patch biphasic system was used. At the time of defibrillation testing, the immediate testing group had a faster mean heart rate (144.7 +/- 30.2 vs 105.8 +/- 17.5 beats/min, P < 0.01), higher mean pulmonary artery pressures (systolic: 18.14 +/- 9.48 vs 11.28 +/- 6.46 mmHg, P = 0.1; diastolic: 6.59 +/- 2.88 vs 3.89 +/- 1.75 mmHg, P < 0.05), and higher mean defibrillation shock impedance (89.0 +/- 11.6 vs 70.9 +/- 7.3 omega, P < 0.002) than the delayed group. The mean ED50 (energy with a 50% success rate) was significantly higher in the immediate group than in the delayed group (26.9 +/- 14.9 vs 14.2 +/- 6.9 J, P < 0.05), and the slopes of the dose-response curves were significantly different (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a right ventricular endocardial to cutaneous patch system, thoracotomy significantly and transiently increased the defibrillation threshold and modified the defibrillation dose-response curve.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.

BACKGROUND: Investigators who studied ventricular defibrillation by use of optical mapping techniques failed to observe an initial defibrillation event (isoelectric window or quiescent period) shown by electrode mapping studies. This discrepancy has important implications for the mechanisms of defibrillation. The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate an optical equivalent of an isoelectric window after a near-threshold defibrillation shock. Methods and Results-- We studied 10 isolated, perfused swine right ventricles. Upper limit of vulnerability was determined by shocks on T waves. A 50% probability of successful defibrillation (DFT50) was determined with an up-down algorithm. Immediately after unsuccessful defibrillation shock, new wavefronts were generated. When the shock strength was low, immediate reinitiation of reentry and ventricular fibrillation might occur without a postshock isoelectric window. However, if the shock strength was within 50 V of DFT50 (near-threshold), a synchronized activation occurred, followed by organized repolarization that ended 64+/-18 ms after shock. After a period of quiescence (18+/-24 ms), activation recurred 83+/-33 ms after shock and reinitiated ventricular fibrillation. Similar patterns of activation, including a quiescent period, were observed after shock was applied on the T wave of the paced beat that induced ventricular fibrillation. Upper limit of vulnerability correlated well with DFT50. CONCLUSIONS: In isolated swine right ventricles, an optical equivalent of an isoelectric window exists after near-threshold defibrillation shocks. These findings support the idea that a near-threshold defibrillation shock terminates all activation wavefronts but fails to halt ventricular fibrillation because the same shock reinitiates ventricular fibrillation after an isoelectric window.

Action Potentials↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Sequential pulse defibrillation for implantable defibrillators.

A technique is described that reduces defibrillation threshold for automatic implantable defibrillators, permits either reducing the size of the pulse generator or increasing the effectiveness of the pulse generator, and provides an increased safety factor. Defibrillation threshold was compared in 12 anesthetized dogs with mean (+/- SD) body weight of 21.6 +/- 3.4 kg for two defibrillating modalities: 1) single pulse technique with current flowing from electrodes in the right ventricle to electrodes either in the superior vena cava or on the left ventricular epicardium, and 2) sequential pulse technique. The sequential pulse technique tested uses two pulses and three or four electrodes. Current of the first 5-ms pulse flows from the superior vena caval electrode to an electrode in the right ventricle, and after a 1-ms interval, current of the second pulse flows from electrodes on the left ventricular epicardium to the right ventricular electrode. Ventricular defibrillation threshold was reduced by 56% to 6.3 +/- 1.03 joules (mean +/- SEM) (P less than 0.01). Because defibrillation threshold is less for sequential pulse defibrillation than for conventional techniques, sequential pulse defibrillators can be smaller and more effective than previously available devices.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Defibrillation energy requirements using a left anterior chest cutaneous to subcutaneous shocking vector: implications for a total subcutaneous implantable defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous implantable defibrillators (ICDs) are being developed to facilitate ICD implantation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the human defibrillation energy requirement (DER) using a left chest cutaneous (Q) to subcutaneous (SQ) shocking vector. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing implantation of an indicated ICD were enrolled (15 males, age = 63 +/- 12 years; ejection fraction = 0.27 +/- 0.14). Defibrillation testing was performed using an investigational system consisting of an external defibrillator and a constructed connector to deliver a shock between a pectoral SQ can and a cardiac apical Q electrode. Two attempts at defibrillation using this configuration were allowed. Stage 1 testing started at 70 J with a step-down/step-up to 50 or 100 J, respectively. Stage 2 testing began at 50 J with a step-down/step-up to 30 or 70 J. RESULTS: During stage 1, a 70-J shock was successful in 7/9 (78%) patients. A second attempt was successful in 7/7 patients using a 50-J shock. In the two remaining patients, a second attempt using a 100-J shock was successful. During stage 2, a 50-J shock was successful in 10/11 (91%) patients. The protocol could not be completed in 2/11 patients. Of the remaining nine patients, a second defibrillation was successful in seven (78%) using a 30-J shock. CONCLUSIONS: The defibrillation energy requirement (DER) of this study vector was 50 J or less in most patients. This low DER supports further investigation of a totally SQ-ICD. However, the DER of 100 J in two patients indicates that further investigation is needed regarding DER variability and safety margins.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.

In a study of 11 dogs, we assessed whether the defibrillation energy requirements of a single transvenous right ventricular electrode/defibrillator can system depended on the can size. We compared the defibrillation threshold obtained with 65% fixed-tilt biphasic shocks with 20, 40, and 80 ml surface area defibrillator cans. The energy was delivered between a right ventricular coil inserted through the jugular vein and the can placed in the subcutaneous tissue of the left superior chest wall. The testing order of each can size was randomly determined. Triplicate defibrillation thresholds were obtained with each can. Despite a higher impedance (20 ml 85 +/- 22 ohms vs 80 ml 71 +/- 16 ohms, p < 0.01), the 20 ml can resulted in a similar defibrillation threshold compared with the 80 ml (20 ml 7.6 +/- 2.8 J vs 80 ml 7.5 +/- 3.4 J) and the 40 ml cans (20 ml 7.6 +/- 2.8 J vs 7.5 +/- 3.4 J). In conclusion, with the unipolar lead system the can size does not appear to be a factor limiting defibrillation success. Even a can the size of a pacemaker does not appear to significantly affect the defibrillation efficacy of this lead system.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

The effects of normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass on defibrillation energy requirements and transmyocardial impedance. Implications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

The influence of normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass on defibrillation energy requirements and transcardiac impedance is not well characterized. However, this relationship is of clinical importance during automatic defibrillator implantation done with concomitant cardiac surgery, and there is anecdotal information that criteria for successful implantation are harder to achieve after such operations. We studied the effect of controlled hypothermia on defibrillation energy requirements and transcardiac impedance in a canine model of cardiopulmonary bypass in which 26 animals underwent right atrial and femoral arterial cannulation, as well as continuous hemodynamic and intramyocardial temperature monitoring. The defibrillation energy requirements were evaluated at 60-minute intervals with an epicardial patch system, and transcardiac impedance was measured before and after the multiple inductions and terminations of ventricular fibrillation. In group 1 (n = 10) defibrillation energy requirements were evaluated immediately after initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass at 37 degrees C (T0), after gradual cooling to 28 degrees C (T1), and after rewarming to 37 degrees C (T2). Group 2 (n = 16) comprised time controls that were identically instrumented and studied, but maintained at 37 degrees C throughout. Percent successful defibrillation was plotted against delivered energy, and the raw data fit by logistic regression. The energy at which 50% of shocks were successful (E50) was 3.23 +/- 0.89 joules at T0, 5.12 +/- 1.85 joules at T1, and 4.42 +/- 1.22 joules at T2 in group 1; this was not significantly different from the corresponding group 2 E50 values, which were 3.11 +/- 1.39 joules, 4.95 +/- 2.47 joules, and 5.59 +/- 3.18 joules, respectively. Both groups demonstrated a significant increase in E50 during the first hour of cardiopulmonary bypass (mean increase from T0 to T1 was 1.89 joules in group 1 and 1.84 joules in group 2, p < 0.05). Transmyocardial impedance fell progressively during the group 2 experiments from 73.6 +/- 12.9 omega at the beginning of the T0 shock series to 61.4 +/- 8.9 omega at the end of the T2 shock series. A similar reduction in transmyocardial impedance was observed during the course of all the group 1 experiments; however, at the beginning of the T1 shock series impedance was significantly elevated to 77.4 +/- 12.3 omega (p < 0.05 compared with group 2 and with end T0 in group 1). There was no relationship between defibrillation energy requirements and transcardiac impedance; there was also no correlation between either of these parameters and intramyocardial extracellular pH or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Defibrillators in public places: the introduction of a national scheme for public access defibrillation in England.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a government-led project-the 'Defibrillators in Public Places' Initiative-to deploy Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in public places. BACKGROUND: A Defibrillator Advisory Committee (DAC) was formed to assist the government with the implementation of the project. Its particular tasks were to: recommend criteria for the selection, training and assessment of those individuals likely to use the devices; procure the equipment necessary for the implementation of the project; procure the training services required for the implementation of the project; ensure the AEDs are sited where they are most likely to be of benefit; establish a mechanism to audit the use of this equipment and the outcome of this initiative. To co-ordinate this project a National Project Manager was appointed. Consultation with Ambulance Services NHS Trusts established the places where cardiac arrest occurred under circumstance where the availability of a defibrillator might be most likely to be effective. Defibrillators were procured under the direction of the NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency in conjunction with medical advisors. Devices that were reliable, safe, simple in operation and with good data retrieval systemes were selected. Training contracts were awarded under the direction of the NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency in conjunction with medical and educational advisors. Organisations with accredited training experience and possessing the appropriate administrative and data handling abilities were selected. The ability to undertake training in an area concordant with current NHS regions was an essential requirement. In the first stage of implementation, pilot trials were successfully established at sites where persons were willing to be trained in the use of automated defibrillators. Arrangements for national progress of the project were made on the basis of the experience gained at pilot sites. A robust system for monitoring the outcome of the project has been established in partnership with the Resuscitation Council UK. The long-term success of this innovative project requires: Continuing central administrative support in the short to medium term. Central audit and data collection. The results of this project should contribute to national databases being established by the Resuscitation Council UK. Continuing adequate funding. The recognition that the provision of defibrillation to the victims of cardiac arrest is a key feature of the NHS.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed1998

[Implanted automatic defibrillator after ventricular fibrillation treated with semi-automatic defibrillation].

We report two cases of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation treated without delay, with basic life support practiced by the witness, followed by a successful defibrillation by paramedics with a semi-automatic defibrillator. In the subsequent month, a cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted. In one patient, a ventricular tachycardia occurring 10 months later and a ventricular fibrillation 9 months later in the other respectively, were successfully reversed by the implanted defibrillator. These two cases illustrate the value of the "survival chain" concept (undelayed alert, basic life support by witness, early defibrillation by paramedics with a semi-automatic defibrillator, advanced life support by a physician) as well as the benefit of the implanted cardioverter-defibrillator.

Adult↗