Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defecography”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Measurement of the anorectal angle by defecography for the diagnosis of fecal incontinence.

We assessed the reliability of anorectal angle (ARA) measurement as an index of fecal incontinence. The "posterior" ARA was measured at rest, squeezing, and straining in 69 continent and 82 incontinent subjects all complaining of various evacuation dysfunctions. The two groups were homogeneous with regard to sex distribution (48.6% vs. 51.4% men and 44.7% vs. 55.3% women, n.s.) and age (56.5 +/- 10.2 vs. 59.3 +/- 9.7 years, n.s.). The incidence of rectal prolapse was the same in the two groups (40 each). The intraobserver agreement index from two independent measurements (Pearson's correlation coefficient), age, and gender interaction [T2 Hotelling test in multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA)] and the most discriminating category of ARA measurement (Fisher's F test in ANOVA) were calculated. In addition, the relationship between ARA and severity of incontinence was assessed by the eta coefficient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was between 0.78 and 0.98 (P < 0.01). The mean ARA differed significantly between the continent and incontinent subjects (104.5 +/- 10.3 degrees vs. 116.2 +/- 23.6 degrees at rest, 84.5 +/- 14.2 degrees vs. 95.1 +/- 20.1 degrees on squeezing, and 133.7 +/- 21.7 degrees vs. 141.7 +/- 25.9 degrees on straining; T2 0.066, P < 0.05 in multivariate ANOVA). No interaction was noted between groups and gender (T2 = 0.023; F = 1.11, n.s.). Resting ARA was shown by ANOVA to be the most discriminating index (F = 9.4 P < 0.01) between the two groups. Overall, ARA measurement was correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence (eta coefficient: 0.894 at rest; 0.811 on squeezing; 0.695 on straining); its accuracy was 79%, the false-positive rate was 15.3% and the false-negative rate 26.5%. Irrespective of the underlying abnormality, namely rectal prolapse, ARA measurement by defecography can: (a) be reinterpreted reliably by the same observer and (b) differentiate continent from incontinent subjects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Evacuation proctography (defecography). A new seat and method of examination.

A new evacuation proctography (defecography) seat and method of examination is described. The seat was constructed in association with the department of biotechnology. It is constructed of perspex and radiographic demonstration of the distal rectum and anal canal region is obtained without distracting artefacts.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed1988

Functional analysis of anorectal junction: defecography.

The radiograms and videotape recordings from 32 defecographies in patients with defecation complaints were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had been examined in an upright position during stooling of a barium contrast medium. All patients had had a double contrast colon examinations which was normal. Internal procidentia was found in 20 patients, enterocele in 9 patients, proctocele in 10 patients, a defective opening of the anorectal junction which was ascribed to incoordination of the puborectal sling was present in 15 patients. Most patients had a variety of concomitant dysfunctions.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Defecography as part of the evaluation of anorectal dysfunction.

Defecography is the evaluation of the anus and rectum during the act of defecation. We have devised a very simple method of performing this examination in conjunction with the Radiology Department. The entire procedure takes less than 15 minutes from start to finish. In our hospital, we have performed over 130 of these tests. A high level of patient cooperation has been noted in our experience. For the most part, the entire procedure from bowel preparation to final films is well tolerated.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed1988

Defecography commode.

A mobile wooden commode was designed and built for use in defecography. The commode is made of 1/2-inch-thick plywood with birch veneer and a solid clear pine seat. Water or copper sheets are recommended for radiation filtration. A radiopaque ruler attached to the commode with a spring enables midline measurements. The modifications suggested by the authors have helped with setup and have improved the images acquired.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Contrast medium gel for marking vaginal position during defecography.

A tampon soaked with contrast medium, which had been inserted into the vagina as part of standard defecography procedure, obscured signs of anterior rectocele and rectal intussusception in a 34-year-old woman. A contrast medium gel for marking vaginal position was formulated, and postsurgical examination with use of the gel revealed improved rectal function and no intussusception. The gel provided excellent contrast without obscuring important diagnostic information.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Defecography: techniques for improved image quality.

Defecography is a radiographic study that demonstrates the physiological process involved when the rectum evacuates. Fluoroscopy, video recording and spot films are used to record the sequence of events that occur during defecation. Proper radiographic techniques and procedures must be used to demonstrate pathological conditions such as rectoceles, rectal intussusception and prolapse of the rectum.

Defecation↗
PubMed1983

[Value and limits of defecography in childhood].

The experience about 73 defecographic exams performed in pediatric age is reported. The casuistry is critically analyzed, taking into consideration the most recent non radiological diagnostic improvements. In the authors' opinion, defecography in pediatric age is advisable in the diagnosis and post-operative control of fecal incontinence. In the other cases radiology may be substituted by other less invasive and sometimes more precise methods.

Child↗
PubMed1994

Evacuation proctography (defecography): an aid to the investigation of pelvic floor disorders.

Patients with pelvic floor disorders frequently have associated anorectal dysfunction, which can be evaluated by a variety of laboratory tests. Evacuation proctography (defecography) documents the process of rectal evacuation and therefore demonstrates disorders of defecation, particularly those of an obstructive nature. It provides objective information about rectocele size and emptying and demonstrates coexistent enteroceles, many of which are missed on physical examination. This radiographic technique is the method of choice for recognizing rectal intussusception, the mechanism by which rectal prolapse occurs. Proctography suggests the diagnosis of spastic pelvic floor (anismus), a disorder amenable to biofeedback therapy. Proctography has limited application in anal incontinence unless there are associated obstructive symptoms. Evaluation of bladder dysfunction is aided by concomitant cystography. Gynecologists managing pelvic floor disorders should assess coexistent anorectal dysfunction, as undiagnosed enteroceles and disorders of defecation are an important cause of persistent or recurrent symptoms following pelvic floor repair. A comprehensive interdisciplinary approach to pelvic floor disorders is recommended.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed1993

Defecography: principles of technique and interpretation.

After description of the performance, physiology and normal findings of defecography, the main pathology is discussed as intra-anal rectal intussusception, extra-anal rectal intussusception, mucosal prolapse, rectocele, descending perineum syndrome, spastic pelvic floor syndrome and the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Finally, the radiation dose and pitfalls are reported.

Defecation↗
PubMed1993

[National working team report on defecography].

A questionnaire concerning defecography was submitted to 5 national experts in order to: 1) quantify the demand and 2) develop a consensus report. The demand is currently 2-8 exams week and the most frequent indication (70%) is obstructed defection, with/without constipation. The highest discriminatory capabilities was exhibited by the following variables: a) the anorectal angle (ARA) on straining and b) the distance from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) on squeezing (101.2 degrees +/- 15 vs. 120.6 degrees +/- 13, p < 0.05 and 27.4 mm +/- 15 vs. 2.4 mm +/- 7, p = 0.005, respectively) in chronically constipated patients (mean age: 60 years) when compared to the control group; and c) PCL on squeezing and at rest (35.5 mm +/- 20 vs. 2.4 mm +/- 7, p = 0.005 and 38.9 mm +/- 18 vs 18.4 mm +/- 17, p < 0.05, respectively) in patients with severe incontinence with respect to healthy subjects. While sensitivity and positive predictive values of the test were highest (97 and 98% respectively) for rectocele, specificity ranked first (92%) in anal gaping.

Defecation↗
PubMed1993

[Multivariate analysis of clinical signs, parameters of anorectal manometry, defecography, transit time of radiopaque markers in 76 patients complaining of fecal incontinence].

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical symptoms, disease past-history, and parameters of anorectal manometry, defecography, and radiopaque pellet transit time in anal incontinence by multivariate analysis. We studied 76 patients, 68 women and 8 men, who complained of anal incontinence, excluding that due to obstetrical lesions. All patients were asked to complete a standard questionnaire. Results indicated that: a) hemorrhoidectomy, hysterectomy, and cholecystectomy appeared to play a role, b) daily incontinence for air or liquid stools is more frequent after hemorrhoidectomy, c) decreased resting pressure of the upper part of the anal canal was observed mainly after hysterectomy, d) decreased resting pressure of the upper part of the anal canal could be a factor of poor prognosis after treatment, e) anal incontinence in men was secondary to traumatic lesions of the anal sphincter in 7 of 8 cases.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The 3rd national workshop on defecography: the functional radiology of (neo) rectal ampullae (ileal reservoir, colo-anal anastomosis, continent perineal colostomy)].

A survey was made in 13 Italian centers with a questionnaire concerning the (a) indications, (b) postoperative complications, (c) functional results and (d) diagnostic imaging modalities related to the making of an ileal or colonic (neo) rectum. Ulcerative colitis (100%), familial polyposis (61.5%) and Crohn's disease (15.3%) were the most common indications for an ileal pouch; rectal cancer (7.96%), chronic inflammatory diseases (15.3%), diverticulosis, rectal prolapse, redundant colon and imperforate anus (7.6% each) were the most common indications for a colonic pouch. Postoperative complications included pelvic abscess (14%), sinus tract/dehiscence (10%) and bowel obstruction (9%). When compared with the S and W variants, the J-shaped ileoanal pouch proved superior because urgency and fecal retention rates were lower (18.4% vs. 44.4% and 23% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), despite slightly more frequent staining episodes (15.8% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.05). As for colonic ampullae, fecal retention and provoked evacuation were more frequent in the J pouch and after gracileplasty; urgency and incontinence in the straight colo-anal anastomosis (33.3% vs. 22.2% and 41.6% vs. 33.3%, respectively). The functional outcome was assessed by anal endosonography (available in 4/13 centers), defecography and anorectal manometry. Abnormal findings included: (a) reduced capacity, barium leakage, anal gaping, sphincter damage (urgency and incontinence); (b) barium retention, pouch dilatation, split evacuation, knobs and strictures (fecal retention).

Defecation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Defecation disorders and the role of defecography.

This continuing education article discusses abnormalities of defecation and the physical mechanisms by which these abnormalities occur. The article also describes the role of defecography and other imaging techniques used to diagnose abnormalities of defecation.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2000

Intraobserver and interobserver measurements of the anorectal angle and perineal descent in defecography.

PURPOSE: Anorectal angle and perineal descent can be measured either by drawing a line defined by the impression of the puborectalis muscle and the tangential of the posterior rectal wall (Method A) or by drawing a straight line at the level of the posterior rectal wall parallel to the central longitudinal axis of the rectum (Method B). The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of measuring anorectal angle and perineal descent by two different methods according to intraobserver and interobserver measurement and to evaluate which method yields more consistent results. METHODS: Five physicians who have had an average of 1.3 years (range, 6 months to 1.5 years) experience in defecographic measurement drew both lines on 63 randomly selected defecographic films and measured anorectal angle and perineal descent by the two methods. The defecographic parameters were measured twice by each observer during a three-week interval. To avoid potential bias, one physician who did not participate in either measurement of perineal descent or anorectal angle performed all data collection. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was quantified using Shrout and Fleiss intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The mean and range of intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver agreement of measuring anorectal angle and perineal descent by Method A were 0.71 (0.6-0.78) and 0.89 (0.74-0.97), respectively, whereas with Method B the coefficients were 0.81 (0.73-0.89) and 0.93 (0.89-0.99), respectively. Regarding the interobserver agreement of the five observers, the mean coefficients for measurement of both anorectal angle and perineal descent by both methods showed similar agreement levels (0.88 and 0.98 by Method A and 0.89 and 0.97 by Method B). The mean (+/- standard deviation) values of anorectal angle and perineal descent found by Method B were significantly larger than those found by Method A (103.3 degrees +/- 19.6 and 6.56+/-3.20 cm and 91.1 degrees +/- 25.6 and 5.64+/-3.42 cm, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of anorectal angle and perineal descent, which were measured by both methods, were more than 0.60, indicating that both methods are reliable and consistent for measurement of anorectal angle and perineal descent. However, centers should consistently use the same line for measurement of anorectal angle and perineal descent because of the statistically significant differences between the two methods and the possibility of inconsistent results.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Diagnostic value of defecography].

The aim of this study was to assess the importance of defecatography in the diagnosis of lower chronic constipation (4) or rectal type (12), principally in those patients on whom other diagnostic methods had not produced supportive data. Over a 64 month period, 65 patients who had consulted because of chronic constipation, were studied; they were suffering from low bowel symptoms like difficulty in the evacuation of the rectum. The average age was 48 and mostly female. All of them were asked to prepare the same mixture for the defecatory study, using the same type of contrast material and study technique. In most of the cases correlated functional elements were found, while very few cases resulting from just organic causes were found, and only one without functional or organic reason was found. Our results were as follows. 1) Insufficient laxity of the pubo-rectal beam related to forward or backward rectocele or lowering of the increased pelvic floor, a fact that was found in 19 patients (29.23%). 2) Inadequate laxity of the pubo rectal beam in 12 patients (18.46%). 3) Paradoxical contraction of the pubo rectal beam related to forward rectocele or lowering of the increased pelvic floor, in 11 patients (16.92%). 4) Lowering of the increased pelvic floor, related to forward or backward rectocele in 8 patients (12.30%). 5) Paradoxical contraction of the pubo rectal beam in 7 patients (10.76%). 6) Forward or backward rectocele in 3 patients (4.61%). 7) Lowering of the increased pelvic floor in 2 patients (3.07%). 8) Rectal intususception in 1 patient (1.53%). 9) Average study in 1 patient (1.53%). Therefore, the defecatography is a very useful method of study to appraise constipation with anorectoperineal symptoms, as it allows us to diagnose organic and functional problems in the area (6). Likewise, the importance of pre and post surgical tests, both therapeutic and reconstructive must be underlined.

Adult↗