Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DENTIFRICES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Breath effects of three marketed dentifrices: a comparative study evaluating single and cumulative use.

This randomized and controlled, examiner blind, parallel group study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of three commercial dentifrices on breath malodor. A total of 384 healthy adult subjects with oral malodor were randomized to one of four brushing groups, using either an antimicrobial dentifrice containing 0.45% stannous fluoride, an antitartar dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride and 5% pyrophosphate, an antimicrobial dentifrice containing 0.24% sodium fluoride and 0.30% triclosan/copolymer, or bottled distilled water which served as the negative experimental control. Breath quality was evaluated over a five-day period by second-person organoleptic grading and measurement of volatile sulfur levels. Following treatment, adjusted mean organoleptic scores and volatile sulfur levels were lowest for the stannous fluoride dentifrice group, with this group exhibiting superior breath quality compared to the negative control at three hours after a single brushing, and again at all cumulative use time points. While all test dentifrices showed some activity, only stannous fluoride had a second-person breath benefit. Breath effects for the other two dentifrices were limited to reductions in volatile sulfur levels at hours 99 and 104 for the antitartar sodium fluoride pyrophosphate dentifrice, and at hour 99 only for the antimicrobial sodium fluoride triclosan/copolymer dentifrice. This research establishes the comparative breath efficacy of three commercial dentifrices in a study model that may prove relevant for other dentifrice clinical trials.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Factors affecting dentifrice use and ingestion among a sample of U.S. preschoolers.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to assess the actual amount of dentifrice used and ingested and factors associated with use/ingestion among 28 U.S. preschoolers aged 40 to 48 months. METHODS: Using their regular dentifrice brands/flavors and small child-sized toothbrushes (Oral -B 5), the participants or their parents placed dentifrice on toothbrushes three times to assess the quantity used and its consistency. Their brushing behaviors were observed and the amounts of dentifrice ingested were indirectly measured. Afterward, the parents and children placed a "pea-sized" amount of dentifrice on their toothbrushes. RESULTS: The participants were generally consistent in quantity applied, averaging 0.256 g (range 0.035 g-0.620 g; standard deviation 0.177 g) of dentifrice per brushing. Children, either alone or with parental assistance, placed more dentifrice than either mother or father alone (P = 0.007). The estimated mean ingested fluoride was 0.17 mg F per brushing, an average of 62% of the amount of dentifrice used (range up to 98%). Amount of ingested fluoride was positively associated (P < 0.05) with the amount of dentifrice used, and negatively associated with parental assistance in brushing. When asked to apply a pea-sized quantity, the mean quantity applied was 0.314 g (range 0.064 g-0.521 g). CONCLUSIONS: This study further supports the use of small amounts of dentifrice in young children, because they ingest substantial proportions of dentifrice.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2000

A calculus clinical study comparing the efficacy of two commercially available dentifrices.

The objective of this double-blind clinical study, conducted in harmony with the Volpe-Manhold design for studies of dental calculus, was to compare the effect on supragingival calculus formation of a dentifrice containing pyrophosphate, tripolyphosphate and a copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base (Test Dentifrice), to that of a commercially available calculus-inhibiting dentifrice containing tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, disodium pyrophosphate, and tetrasodium pyrophosphate in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base (Positive Control Dentifrice). Adult male and female subjects from the Northern New Jersey area were entered into the study, provided a full oral prophylaxis and assigned the use of a placebo (non-calculus-inhibiting) dentifrice for eight weeks. At the completion of this initial period, subjects were assessed for baseline Volpe-Manhold Calculus Index scores, provided another full prophylaxis and stratified into two treatment groups which were balanced for age, sex and baseline calculus. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth twice daily (morning and evening) for one minute with their assigned dentifrice, using a soft-bristled toothbrush. Examinations for dental calculus were again performed after twelve weeks' use of the study dentifrices. Eighty-nine (89) subjects complied with the protocol and completed the entire study. At the three-month examination, the Test Dentifrice group exhibited a statistically significant 31.0% reduction in the mean Volpe-Manhold Calculus Index score compared to the Positive Control Dentifrice group. The results of this clinical study support the conclusion that a new calculus-inhibiting dentifrice containing pyrophosphate, tripolyphosphate, and a copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base is efficacious for the control of the development of supragingival calculus, and provides a level of benefit greater than that provided by a commercially available calculus-inhibiting dentifrice containing tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, disodium pyrophosphate, and tetrasodium pyrophosphate in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A clinical comparison of two calculus-inhibiting dentifrices.

The objective of this double-blind clinical study, conducted in harmony with the Volpe-Manhold design for studies of dental calculus, was to compare the effect on supragingival calculus formation of a dentifrice containing pyrophosphate, tripolyphosphate and a copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base (Test Dentifrice), to that of a commercially available calculus-inhibiting dentifrice containing tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, disodium pyrophosphate and tetrasodium pyrophosphate in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base (Positive Control Dentifrice). Adult male and female subjects from the Buffalo, New York area were entered into the study, provided a full oral prophylaxis, and assigned the use of a placebo (non-calculus-inhibiting) dentifrice for fourteen weeks. At the completion of this initial period, subjects were assessed for baseline Volpe-Manhold Calculus Index scores, provided another full prophylaxis, and stratified into two treatment groups which were balanced for age, sex and baseline calculus. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth twice daily (morning and evening) for one minute with their assigned dentifrice, using a soft-bristled toothbrush. Examinations for dental calculus were again performed after twelve weeks' use of the study dentifrices. Ninety-one (91) subjects complied with the protocol and completed the entire study. At the three-month examination, the Test Dentifrice group exhibited a statistically significant 27.3% reduction in mean Volpe-Manhold Calculus Index score as compared to the Positive Control Dentifrice group. The results of this clinical study support the conclusion that a new calculus-inhibiting dentifrice, containing pyrophosphate, tripolyphosphate and a copolymer in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base, is efficacious for the control of the development of supragingival calculus, and provides a level of benefit greater than that provided by a commercially available calculus-inhibiting dentifrice containing tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, disodium pyrophosphate and tetrasodium pyrophosphate in a 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica base.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Caries inhibition efficacy of an antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrice.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a fluoride dentifrice containing a fixed combination of essential oils (Thymol, Menthol, Eucalyptol, and Methyl Salicylate) in preventing caries in Sprague Dawley rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dentifrice contains 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) as the fluoride source and a silica abrasive system. A fluoride-free placebo and a clinically proven USP dentifrice reference standard for SMFP/silica were included as controls. Three groups of 45 SDV-free Sprague Dawley weanlings were infected by a cariogenic strain of Streptococcus sobrinus and fed cariogenic diet NIH 2000 ad libitum. Animals were treated twice daily (once on weekends) with the assigned dentifrice using a cotton-tipped applicator, for 5 wks, after which they were terminated and caries scored using Larson's modification of the Keyes method. RESULTS: Analyses of variance were used to compare inter-group means, the total E lesion score was the primary efficacy variable. Compared with the fluoride-free vehicle control, the experimental dentifrice and USP reference standard dentifrice produced a statistically significant reductions of 18.3% and 12.2% respectively for total caries score (P<0.001). Compared with the clinically tested USP positive control dentifrice, the experimental dentifrice produced a statistically significant reduction in the total caries score of 6.9% (P=0.028). The results of this study show that 1) both the new dentifrice containing essential oils and USP dentifrice are statistically significantly effective in reducing caries in the rat model, 2) the anticaries activity of the SMFP dentifrice is not adversely affected with the addition of essential oils.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

Desensitizing efficacy of Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength and Fresh Mint Sensodyne dentifrices.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relative effectiveness provided by a new dentifrice containing 5.0% potassium nitrate and 0.454% stannous fluoride in a silica base (Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength dentifrice) for reducing dentin hypersensitivity over an 8-wk period, as compared to that provided by a commercially-available antihypersensitivity dentifrice containing 5.0% potassium nitrate and 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate in a dicalcium phosphate base (Fresh Mint Sensodyne dentifrice). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To qualify for participation in this examiner-blind clinical study, male and female adults from the central New Jersey area were required to present with tactile and air blast dentin hypersensitivity in at least two non-molar teeth at two examinations, spaced 1 wk apart. Qualifying subjects were randomized into two treatment groups, which were balanced for gender, age, and baseline sensitivity scores. Subjects were provided with a soft-bristled toothbrush. Examinations for tactile and air blast sensitivity were repeated after 4 wks' use of the study dentifrices, and again after 8 wks' usage. 97 subjects complied with the protocol, and completed the entire study. RESULTS: After 4 wks, subjects assigned to the Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength dentifrice group exhibited a statistically significant improvement over the Sensodyne dentifrice group with respect to tactile sensitivity scores, and a statistically significant improvement over the Sensodyne dentifrice group with respect to air blast sensitivity scores. Correspondingly significant improvements were presented after 8 wks. Thus, the results of this examiner-blind clinical study support the conclusion that the Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength dentifrice containing 5.0% potassium nitrate and 0.454% stannous fluoride in a silica base provided superior levels of control of tactile and air blast sensitivity than the clinically tested, commercially-available anti-hypersensitivity dentifrice Sensodyne dentifrice containing 5.0% potassium nitrate and 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate in a dicalcium phosphate base.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Effect of three concentrations of sodium fluoride dentifrices on clinical caries.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the anti-caries effectiveness of three concentrations of fluoride dentifrice (placebo, 500 ppm F- and 1450 ppm F-) could be differentiated with small sample sizes in short time frames. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A controlled fluoride (F) dose-response study was conducted in concurrence with a supervised school oral hygiene regimen to assess whether dentifrices with increasing fluoride levels could be differentiated with small sample sizes in short time frames. The study was a randomized, double-blind study conducted for a period of 21 months. Subjects (N = 657 with approximately 219 per group) were randomized to placebo dentifrice, 500 ppm F- dentifrice or 1450 ppm F- dentifrice treatments for the first 9 months of the study. Subjects in the placebo group were then switched to either 500 ppm F- or 1450 ppm F- dentifrice for the remainder of the study, while subjects in the fluoride groups continued with their original treatment assignments. A calibrated examiner measured visual-tactile caries as DMFS that was supplemented with a radiographic examination at baseline, 9 months and 21 months for each subject. RESULTS: The mean caries increments at 9 months were 0.35 surfaces, 0.34 surfaces, and 1.28 surfaces for the 1450 ppm F-, 500 ppm F-, and placebo groups, respectively. The mean caries increments at 21 months were 0.21 surfaces, 0.26 surfaces, 1.75 surfaces and 1.90 surfaces for the 1450 ppm F-, 500 ppm F-, placebo/1450 ppm F-, and placebo/500 ppm F- groups, respectively. The 500 ppm F- and 1450 ppm F- fluoride dentifrices delivered statistically significantly (P< 0.05) lower DMFS scores than the placebo control dentifrice at 9 months, while at 21 months the 500 ppm F- and 1450 ppm F- fluoride dentifrices delivered statistically significantly lower DMFS scores as compared to the both the placebo/500 ppm F- and the placebo/1450 ppm F- dentifrice groups. There was no evidence of a dose response (1450 ppm F- < 500 ppm F-) at 9 months or at 21 months. In this study, the effectiveness of the two fluoride dentifrices was observed at 9 months and these outcomes were still present at 21 months, confirming that caries benefits can be observed in time frames as short as 9 months with approximately 200 subjects per treatment group.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2003

The effects of a new therapeutic triclosan/copolymer/sodium-fluoride dentifrice on oral bacteria, including odorigenic species.

This investigation examined the in vitro and ex vivo antimicrobial effects of a new dentifrice, Colgate Total Advanced Fresh, formulated with triclosan/copolymer/sodium fluoride, on oral bacteria, including those odorigenic bacteria implicated in bad breath. The effects of Colgate Total Advanced Fresh were compared to commercially available fluoride dentifrices that served as controls. Three experimental approaches were undertaken for these studies. In the first approach, the dentifrice formulations were tested in vitro against 13 species of oral bacteria implicated in bad breath. The second approach examined the antimicrobial activity derived from dentifrice that was adsorbed to and released from hydroxyapatite disks. In this approach, dentifrice-treated hydroxyapatite disks were immersed in a suspension of bacteria, and reduction in bacterial viability from the release of bioactive agents from hydroxyapatite was determined. The third approach examined the effect of treating bacteria immediately after their removal from the oral cavity of 11 adult human volunteers. This ex vivo study examined the viability of cultivable oral bacteria after dentifrice treatment for 2 minutes. Antimicrobial effects were determined by plating Colgate Total Advanced Fresh and control-dentifrice-treated samples on enriched media (for all cultivable oral bacteria) and indicator media (for hydrogen-sulfide-producing organisms), respectively. Results indicated that the antimicrobial effects of Colgate Total Advanced Fresh were significantly greater than either of the other dentifrices for all 13 oral odorigenic bacterial strains tested in vitro (P < or = 0.05). In the second approach, Colgate Total Advanced Fresh-treated hydroxyapatite disks were significantly more active in reducing bacterial growth than the other dentifrices tested (P < or = 0.05). Finally, ex vivo treatment of oral bacteria with Colgate Total Advanced Fresh demonstrated a 90.9% reduction of all oral cultivable bacteria and a 91.5% reduction of oral bacteria producing hydrogen sulfide compared with the control dentifrice. In conclusion, these results, taken together with the significant reductions in clinical malodor scores by Colgate Total Advanced Fresh demonstrated in organoleptic studies, strongly suggest that this dentifrice kills the bacteria that are implicated in the cause of bad breath.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Comparative investigation of the desensitizing efficacy of a new dentifrice containing 5.5% potassium citrate: an eight-week clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind clinical study was designed to investigate the relative effectiveness of a new desensitizing test dentifrice containing 5.5% potassium citrate, 1.14% sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP) and 10% high-cleaning silica (HCS) in a silica base for reducing dentinal hypersensitivity over an eight-week period, to that of a commercially available desensitizing positive control dentifrice containing 3.75% potassium chloride, 0.32% sodium fluoride and 0.3% triclosan in a silica base. METHODOLOGY: A total of 80 subjects were entered into the study, and stratified into two balanced groups according to their baseline mean thermal (air blast) and baseline mean tactile (Yeaple Probe) sensitivity scores. The two groups were randomly assigned to use either the test dentifrice containing potassium citrate/MFP/HCS, or the positive control dentifrice containing potassium chloride/sodium fluoride/triclosan. The two groups were well balanced with regard to their mean baseline thermal and tactile sensitivity scores, sex and age. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth twice daily (morning and evening) for one minute with their assigned dentifrice and a commercially available soft-bristled toothbrush. Dentinal hypersensitivity examinations, which included tactile sensitivity and thermal sensitivity, were conducted at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. Examinations were conducted by the same dental examiner on the subjects at each examination. RESULTS: After four weeks' use of their assigned products, those subjects in the test dentifrice group demonstrated no statistically significant difference for controlling dentinal hypersensitivity as compared to the positive control dentifrice group in tactile and air blast. After eight weeks' use of their assigned products, those subjects in the test dentifrice group again demonstrated no statistically significant difference in tactile and air blast sensitivity as compared to the positive control dentifrice group. CONCLUSION: The results of this double-blind clinical study indicate that the use of a commercially available test dentifrice containing 5.5% potassium citrate, 1.14% sodium monofluorophosphate and 10% high-cleaning silica in a silica base demonstrates no statistically significant difference in tactile and air blast sensitivity compared to the commercially available desensitizing positive control dentifrice containing 3.75% potassium chloride, 0.32% sodium fluoride and 0.3% triclosan in a silica base.

Dentifrices↗
PubMed1990

Comparative anticalculus effect of dentifrices containing 1.30% soluble pyrophosphate with and without a copolymer.

A six-month, double blind, clinical study was conducted to determine the effect on supragingival calculus formation of a dentifrice containing 1.30% soluble pyrophosphate (from 2.0% tetrasodium pyrophosphate) and 1.50% of a copolymer of methoxyethylene and maleic acid, as compared to a dentifrice containing the same amount of soluble pyrophosphate but without the copolymer. This pyrophosphate/copolymer dentifrice contained the optimal ratio of pyrophosphate anion to copolymer required for obtaining a comparable anticalculus effect to a clinically proven anticalculus dentifrice containing 3.3% soluble pyrophosphate and 1.0% of a copolymer. The optimal pyrophosphate/copolymer ratio was determined by a series of in vitro laboratory and in vivo animal studies. Male and female adult subjects were stratified into three balanced groups according to baseline calculus scores. They received an oral prophylaxis and were assigned to the use of either the dentifrice containing soluble pyrophosphate and the copolymer, or to the dentifrice containing soluble pyrophosphate but without the copolymer, or to a placebo dentifrice that did not contain an anticalculus ingredient. The results of the three-month calculus examination indicated that the dentifrice containing soluble pyrophosphate and the copolymer provided a 33.66% reduction in supragingival calculus formation after an oral prophylaxis as compared to the placebo dentifrice. This reduction was statistically significant at the 99 percent level of confidence. The results of the six-month calculus examination indicated that the dentifrice containing the soluble pyrophosphate and the copolymer provided a 36.10% reduction in supragingival calculus formation after an oral prophylaxis, as compared to the placebo dentifrice. This reduction was also statistically significant at the 99% level of confidence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1981

A three-year clinical caries evaluation of the effect of a sodium fluoride-silica abrasive dentifrice.

This study was conducted to determine if the anticaries effectiveness of a 0.243% sodium fluoride-silica abrasive dentifrice is superior to a 0.4% stannous fluoride-calcium pyrophosphate dentifrice. A nonfluoride, calcium pyrophosphate abrasive placebo dentifrice was also included at one-third the sample size of the active treatment groups to estimate the level of efficacy of the sodium fluoride dentifrice. A total of 3,093 schoolchildren were randomly assigned at a ratio of 3:3:1 to the sodium fluoride dentifrice, the stannous fluoride dentifrice, or the placebo dentifrice, respectively. Caries examinations were made by the same examiner initially and after one, two, and three years of ad libitum product usage. After three years, the results showed that the group using the sodium fluoride dentifrice had significantly fewer DMF teeth and DMF surfaces increments than the group using the stannous fluoride dentifrice. The percent reductions for DMF teeth and DMF surfaces were 24.2% and 22.6%, respectively. Both groups using fluoride dentifrices also had significantly fewer DMF teeth and DMF surfaces increments than the group using the placebo dentifrice.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

The clinical effect of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice on plaque formation, gingivitis and gingival bleeding: a six-month study.

The effects of a stabilized 0.454% stannous fluoride dentifrice, currently marketed as Crest Gum Care, on supragingival plaque, gingivitis, gingival bleeding and oral soft tissue condition were studied in 328 adult male and female subjects who completed a six-month, double blind clinical study. Following initial examinations, subjects presenting with a minimum of five gingival bleeding sites received a thorough dental prophylaxis and were instructed to brush at least twice a day for three months with a commercially available fluoride dentifrice, packaged in such a way as to blind its identity to the study subjects. This constituted the three-month pre-test period. At the end of this period, subjects were again examined, given a second oral prophylaxis, and randomly assigned to brush with one of the following dentifrices: 1) stabilized 0.454% stannous fluoride, 2) 0.243% sodium fluoride control, or 3) one of three experimental dentifrices. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth as they normally would, at least twice a day for one minute per brushing. Follow-up examinations after three and six months of dentifrice use evaluated supragingival plaque, gingivitis, gingival bleeding, extrinsic tooth stain and oral soft tissue status. After six months, the stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice significantly reduced gingivitis and gingival bleeding by 20.5% and 33.4% compared to the sodium fluoride control group. However, the stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice group was not significantly different from the control dentifrice group with respect to supragingival plaque scores. As expected, accumulation of extrinsic tooth stain was greater in the stabilized stannous fluoride group than the control group. No unexpected nor clinically significant oral soft tissue health effects were associated with the use of the test dentifrices. The results from this clinical study demonstrate that over a six-month period, twice-daily use of a dentifrice containing 0.454% stabilized stannous fluoride significantly reduced gingivitis and gingival bleeding, relative to a 0.243% sodium fluoride control dentifrice.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The effects of a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice on oral bacteria including those producing hydrogen sulfide.

A clinical procedure was developed to examine the effects of short-term and extended use of a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice and a commercial fluoride dentifrice on oral bacteria, including those producing hydrogen sulfide. Healthy adults volunteered for this double-blind, crossover design clinical study and provided saliva samples for culturing on enriched and indicator media to enumerate all salivary bacteria and those producing hydrogen sulfide (odorigenic), respectively. Subjects brushed with an assigned dentifrice for 7 d and were sampled on day 8 to assess the long-term effects on bacteria. Extended use of the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice resulted in a 49% and 66% reduction of salivary and odorigenic bacteria, respectively, compared with the fluoride dentifrice. To examine short-term effects, subjects subsequently brushed with their assigned dentifrice and were sampled at 2 h and 4 h post-brushing. At 2 h and 4 h post-brushing, the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice resulted in a 62% and 52% decrease for salivary bacteria and 79% and 72% decrease for odorigenic bacteria, respectively, vs. the fluoride dentifrice. The results indicate a significant decrease of all salivary bacteria and hydrogen sulfide-producing odorigenic bacteria following use of the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice and explain previous results on the efficacy of this dentifrice on oral malodor.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Use of multiple sensitivity measurements and logit statistical analysis to assess the effectiveness of a potassium-citrate-containing dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity.

A potassium citrate-SMFP containing dentifrice was tested in a double-blind 8-week clinical trial on subjects with a history of dentinal hypersensitivity. A dentifrice containing SMFP but no potassium salt was used as the control and a 2nd test dentifrice containing potassium nitrate-SMFP was assessed at the same time. The sensitivity of the subjects was evaluated at 0, 3 and 8 weeks using electrical and tactile methods plus a 1-s air blast. The sensitivity scores for each subject at each examination were summarised as a proportion of the examined teeth deemed sensitive. Assessment of any effects of the dentifrices was via an analysis of covariance of the logit transformation of these proportions with the baseline value as the covariate. The use of this novel method of analysis had the advantage of taking into account changes in sensitivity of all of the teeth, both sensitive and non-sensitive, since electrical measurements indicated effects on both. Of the original 120 subjects, 111 completed the trial and the 3 dentifrice groups remained well balanced for age, sex and sensitivity. All 3 dentifrice groups showed statistically significant reductions in sensitivity over the 8 weeks. However, the potassium citrate-SMFP dentifrice was significantly more effective than either the control SMFP dentifrice, or the potassium nitrate-SMFP dentifrice, at reducing sensitivity after 3 weeks, and this difference plus further sensitivity reduction with all 3 dentifrices was observed after 8 weeks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Brushing with and without dentifrice on gingival abrasion.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate two factors possibly influencing incidence of gingival abrasion during toothbrushing: (1) the abrasiveness of a dentifrice and (2) the possible influence of feedback of oral sensory perception. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this purpose, two separate, single blind, randomized clinical experiments were performed. The two groups of subjects were requested not to brush their teeth 48 h, prior to the experiments. After staining with disclosing solution gingival abrasion sites were recorded as small (< or =5 mm) and large (>5 mm), both before and after brushing. The dentifrice experiment was a split-mouth design, including 36 subjects, brushing their teeth in two randomly selected contra-lateral quadrants, either with or without dentifrice, whereas the remaining two quadrants were brushed, using the alternative choice. The sensory perception feedback experiment was a full-mouth design, including 43 subjects and two separate brushing exercises with use of dentifrice. The first brushing-exercise was performed by a dental hygienist, excluding the feedback of oral sensory perception of the brusher. After a 4 weeks period of familiarization to the manual toothbrush, subjects brushed themselves in the same random order as the hygienist, using a fresh brush, thus including oral sensory perception. RESULTS: In the dentifrice experiment, the increment of small abrasion sites was 5.86 for brushing with and 5.75 without dentifrice. There was no statistically significant difference between brushing with and without dentifrice. Both with and without dentifrice, more small abrasions were found vestibular, (3.78 and 4.22, respectively) as compared with lingual (2.22 and 1.42, respectively) (p=0.027, p<0.001). In the sensory perception feedback experiment, the increment in small gingival abrasion sites was larger for the subjects brushing themselves (8.86) as compared with the professional brushing (2.94, p <0.0001). Subjects caused more abrasion on the vestibular surfaces (6.28) as compared with the lingual (0.60, p=0.0001), where the professional did not show this difference (vestibular: 1.88, lingual: 1.30, p=0. 1388). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in the incidence of gingival abrasion was found between brushing with dentifrice or without dentifrice. Neither did oral sensory perception seem to affect the incidence of gingival abrasion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

A study of the ability of an in situ remineralization model to differentiate between the effects of two fluoride dentifrices that produced significantly different clinical caries results.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in situ remineralization model was able to show a difference in the effects of two dentifrices of different fluoride concentrations and significantly different clinical efficacies. Three dentifrices were tested in a double-blind, cross-over study design. The products contained 0 ppm F, 250 ppm F, or 1000 ppm F from sodium fluoride and were formulated with a silica base according to the formulations used in a human caries trial (Koch et al., 1990). Nineteen subjects each carried three or four thin sections of enamel in their partial dentures. The thin sections, containing artificial caries lesions, were covered with a steel mesh to provide space for plaque formation and then brushed in situ three times daily with the dentifrices. Following the two-week treatment periods, the specimens were removed from the dentures and analyzed for changes in mineral content. The findings showed that the placebo dentifrice (0 ppm F) resulted in 56.8 +/- 74.3% demineralization, the 250-ppm-F dentifrice produced 12.9 +/- 41.3% demineralization, thereby showing partial caries protection, and the 1000-ppm-F dentifrice produced 17.3 +/- 32.1% remineralization. Linear regression analysis showed that the percent remineralization was significantly related to the fluoride concentration in the dentifrice (p less than 0.001). The 250-ppm-F dentifrice was also significantly less effective than the 100-ppm-F dentifrice (p = 0.04, one-tailed Fisher Protected LSD test). These findings are in accord with the human caries trial and support the use of the present in situ remineralization model for prediction of the anticaries efficacy of fluoride dentifrice products.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Clinical effect of a new liquid dentifrice containing triclosan/copolymer on existing plaque and gingivitis.

BACKGROUND: Dentifrices traditionally have been formulated as pastes or gels. However, liquid varieties recently have become available The authors conducted a study to determine whether a fluoridated liquid product with added triclosan and a polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid, or PVM/MA, copolymer delivery system is efficacious for the control of supragingival plaque and gingivitis. METHODS: The authors conducted a six-month, double-blind, parallel, stratified clinical study in accordance with American Dental Association guidelines for the clinical evaluation of antiplaque/antigingivitis products. Subjects who qualified with a suitable amount of existing plaque and gingivitis were given one of two dentifrices: an "experimental" liquid dentifrice containing 0.3 percent triclosan, 2.0 percent PVM/MA copolymer and 0.243 percent sodium fluoride, or NaF, in a silica base; or a "placebo" dentifrice containing 0.243 percent NaF in a silica base. The authors collected subjects' plaque and gingival index scores at baseline, three months and six months. RESULTS: The results of the study indicate that the use of the experimental liquid dentifrice provided a significant reduction in existing levels of plaque and gingivitis as compared with the placebo standard dentifrice. At six months, the experimental group demonstrated a 34.9 percent reduction in plaque formation and a 25.7 percent reduction in gingivitis as compared with the placebo group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with the placebo, the experimental dentifrice had a significantly better ability to reduce plaque and gingivitis. When compared with results reported in the literature, this new form of dentifrice achieved results comparable in efficacy to those of traditional dentifrice pastes with matching active ingredients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study confirms that a liquid dentifrice containing a triclosan/copolymer/NaF delivery system is efficacious in its ability to reduce existing plaque and gingivitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Clinical effectiveness of a dentifrice containing fluoride and a citrate buffer system for treatment of dentinal sensitivity.

Four test dentifrices were evaluated in a double-blind investigation to determine their effect on dentinal sensitivity in 87 adult human participants. Baseline data were obtained by patient questionnaire, dental examination and by soliciting subjective responses to controlled osmotic, thermal and tactile stimuli. The four dentifrices were: (1) a placebo dentifrice, (2) a fluoride dentifrice containing 0.1% fluoride, (3) a 2% citrate buffered dentifrice in a pluronic gel and (4) a dentifrice containing 0.1% fluoride and 2% citrate buffer in a pluronic gel. Precipitated silica provided the abrasive for all dentifrices. Dentifrices were supplied to participants on a random basis, and participants were instructed to brush twice daily for 8 weeks. Responses to the three stimuli as accomplished at baseline were obtained at 2, 4 and 8 weeks on 81 participants. A statistically significant stimulus reduction was found between treatment groups to thermal stimulus at the 2-month interval (P = 0.048) and to the tactile stimulus at 2 weeks (P = 0.019). Both the citrate dentifrice and the citrate/fluoride dentifrices demonstrated significant efficiency in reducing sensitivity.

Adult↗