Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DELIRIUM”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is common in hospitalized elderly people. Delirium may affect 60% of frail elderly people in hospital. Among the cognitively impaired, 45% have been found to develop delirium and these patients have longer lengths of hospital stay and a higher rate of complications which, with other factors, increase costs of care. The management of delirium has commonly been multifaceted, the primary emphasis has to be on the diagnosis and therapy of precipitating factors, but as these may not be immediately resolved, symptomatic and supportive care are also of major importance. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess the available evidence for the effectiveness, if any, of multidisciplinary team interventions in the coordinated care of elderly patients with delirium superimposed on an underlying chronic cognitive impairment in comparison with usual care. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a last updated search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 3 July 2003 using the terms delirium and confus*. The Register is regularly updated and contains records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection for possible inclusion in this review was made on the basis of the research methodology - controlled trials whose participants are reported as having chronic cognitive impairment, and who then developed incident delirium and were randomly assigned to either coordinated multidisciplinary care or usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Nine controlled trials were identified for possible inclusion in the review, only one of which met the inclusion criteria. At present the data from that study cannot be analysed. We have requested additional data from the authors and are awaiting their reply. MAIN RESULTS: No studies focused on patients with prior cognitive impairment, so management of delirium in this group could not be assessed. There is very little information on the management of delirium in the literature despite an increasing body of information about the incidence, risks and prognosis of the disorder in the elderly population. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: The management of delirium needs to be studied in a more clearly defined way before evidence-based guidelines can be developed. Insufficient data are available for the development of evidence-based guidelines on diagnosis or management. There is scope for research in all areas - from basic pathophysiology and epidemiology to prevention and management. Though much recent research has focused on the problem of delirium, the evidence is still difficult to utilize in management programmes. Research needs to be undertaken targeting specific groups known to be at high risk of developing delirium, for example the cognitively impaired and the frail elderly. As has been highlighted by Inouye 1999, delirium has very important economic and health policy implications and is a clinical problem that can affect all aspects of care of an ill older person.Delirium, though a frequent problem in hospitalized elderly patients, is still managed empirically and there is no evidence in the literature to support change to current practice at this time.

Aged↗

[Delirium after vascular surgery interventions. Intermediate-term results of a prospective study].

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative delirium is a common psychic disturbance occurring acutely after various surgical procedures and typically presenting with a fluctuating course. These patients' recovery takes longer. In this study we analyze the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing vascular surgery and try to identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective arterial operations were included. Their medical history, the specific vascular diagnosis and operation performed, the medication and laboratory data were monitored. Additionally the patients were preoperatively interviewed by a psychiatrist. Intraoperatively the drugs, infusions, possible transfusions, blood gases and pressures were monitored, as were the times of surgery and anesthesia. Postoperatively patients were seen daily by the psychiatrist and the surgeon for at least 7 days. Postoperative delirium was diagnosed according to DSM IV criteria, and mild, moderate and severe delirium were distinguished. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients entered the study. Twenty-one (38.9%) developed postoperative delirium (11 mild, 2 moderate, 8 severe). Patients with aortic operations developed delirium more frequently than those with non-aortic procedures(55.5 vs 22.2%, n = 27 each). Some preexisting diseases (hearing disturbance) increased the probability of postoperative delirium, while age was not identified as a risk factor. General psychopathological and depressive disturbances increased the likelihood of postoperative delirium. Patients who had a severe intraoperative course developed postoperative delirium more frequently. This was not seen in the absolute time of surgery or anesthesia nor in the intraoperative development of blood pressure or intraarterial gases, which did not differ between patients with and without postoperative delirium. More reliable parameters were an increased intraoperative need for crystalloid volume, intra- or postoperatively decreased hemoglobin values (Hb < 10 g/dl) and the development of acidosis that had to be treated. Patients with delirium had serious complications more often (8/21 = 38.1% vs 6/33 = 18.2%) and needed Intensive Care treatment longer (2.7 vs 2.1 days, only aortic surgery 3.2 vs 2.4 days). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative delirium after vascular surgery is frequent. Patients undergoing aortic surgery, with specific concomitant medical disease, psychopathological disturbances and a severe intraoperative course, are at risk of developing postoperative delirium.

Aged↗

Postoperative delirium in spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative delirium is a great concern in the treatment of hip fracture. However, there have been no reports regarding the postoperative delirium in spine surgery. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium in the patients who have had spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: The incidence and intraoperative risk factors of postoperative delirium were retrospectively examined in patients who had spine surgery during a 3-year period. PATIENT SAMPLE: Three hundred forty-one patients who underwent spine surgery from 2000 to 2002 were included. METHODS: The presence of delirium was determened by the Confusion Assessment Method. Laboratory data were checked preoperatively, at 1 day and 1 week postoperatively. The prognosis of postoperative delirium was evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperative delirium was found in 13 patients; all of them were in their 70's or 80's. The incidence of delirium was 12.5% in the patients over 70 years old. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels at 1 day after surgery in the delirium group were significantly lower than those in the control group. One patient had persistent cognitive dysfunction after surgery. Two patients who developed postoperative delirium died during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Low concentrations of hemoglobin and hematocrit 1 day after surgery were risk factors for postoperative delirium. As delirium is thought to represent not only brain dysfunction, but also impaired general physical condition, careful observation is necessary for the management of patients with postoperative delirium.

Adolescent↗

Delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review.

Delirium in a patient with preexisting dementia is a common problem that may have serious complications and poor prognostic implications. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the medical literature on delirium superimposed on dementia, specifically to review studies on prevalence, associated features, outcomes, and management. Areas of controversy and gaps in our knowledge of this problem are highlighted. Finally, an agenda for future research is proposed. Fourteen studies were reviewed, including seven prospective studies, three retrospective studies, two cross-sectional studies, and two clinical trials. For the review of the literature on delirium superimposed on dementia, we searched MEDLINE from January 1966 through February 2002 for research studies with primary sources of data. Selection criteria for inclusion of articles in this study were inclusion of data on subjects with delirium superimposed on dementia, inclusion of a validated operational definition/measures of dementia and delirium, actual data on persons with delirium and dementia reported in the paper, and reporting of primary data. MEDLINE was searched using the following key search terms: delirium, acute confusion, cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, delirium superimposed on dementia, and elderly. The prevalence of delirium superimposed on dementia ranged from 22% to 89% of hospitalized and community populations aged 65 and older with dementia. To date, only one reported study systematically identified associated factors and interventions for delirium superimposed on dementia, but several studies examining outcomes have found that adverse events are associated with delirium in persons with dementia, including accelerated and long-term cognitive and functional decline, need for institutionalization, rehospitalization, and increased mortality. This paper highlights the dearth of research on delirium superimposed on dementia and stresses the importance of early recognition and prevention of delirium in persons with dementia.

Delirium↗

The natural history of delirium in older hospitalized patients: a syndrome of heterogeneity.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the presentation, course and duration of delirium in hospitalized older people. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient surgical and medical wards at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 432 people over the age of 65. MEASUREMENTS: All participants were screened daily for confusion and, in those who were confused, delirium was ascertained using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) III-R criteria. Those who were found to be delirious were followed daily while in hospital for evidence of delirium. The Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) was used to describe the clinical characteristics of delirium. RESULTS: About 15% of subjects had delirium. Sixty-nine percent of delirious subjects had delirium on a single day. The DRS total was higher on the first day of delirium for those with delirium on multiple days than those with delirium on a single day (P = 0.03). Among those with delirium on multiple days, there were no patterns of change over time in specific DRS items. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium in hospitalized older people is common and has a varied presentation and time course. Clinicians and researchers need to consider this great heterogeneity when caring for patients and when studying delirium.

Aged↗

Neural mechanisms of delirium: current hypotheses and evolving concepts.

The purpose of this article is to review current knowledge regarding potential neural mechanisms of delirium. A MEDLINE search for relevant English language articles was undertaken using various combinations of delirium (including cognitive disorders, encephalopathy, and confusion) with pathogenesis and pathophysiology. These articles were scanned for content related to hypotheses concerning the neurobiology of delirium. Additional references were obtained from a manual search of the bibliography of these articles. A secondary MEDLINE search of delirium with the mechanism in question (i.e., serotonin, acetylcholine, etc.) was then undertaken. Literature review was last updated as of April 1998. Despite being a common problem among elderly patients, the mechanisms of delirium are poorly understood. Delirium is a syndrome that may occur as the result of multiple complex interacting neurotransmitter systems and pathologic processes. The neurotransmitters acetylcholine and serotonin may play particularly important roles in common medical and surgical delirium. Other neurotransmitters such as dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid each may be involved in the development of delirium under special conditions. Other neurobiologic factors such as cytokines, cortisol abnormalities, and oxygen free radicals will require further study to define their role in delirium. Distinct neuropathologic processes leading to delirium are beginning to be defined. Such mechanisms may differ in various clinical settings. There is probably no final common pathway to delirium, but rather, delirium is the final common symptom of multiple neurotransmitter abnormalities. Further situation-specific studies of delirium pathophysiology should lead to more effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Acetylcholine↗

Relationship between pain and opioid analgesics on the development of delirium following hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Delirium and pain are common following hip fracture. Untreated pain has been shown to increase the risk of delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery. This study was performed to examine the relationship among pain, analgesics, and other factors on delirium in hip fracture patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study at four New York hospitals that enrolled 541 patients with hip fracture and without delirium. Delirium was identified prospectively by patient interview supplemented by medical record review. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 541 patients (16%) became delirious. Among all subjects, risk factors for delirium were cognitive impairment (relative risk, or RR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, or CI, 1.8-7.2), abnormal blood pressure (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7), and heart failure (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.3). Patients who received less than 10 mg of parenteral morphine sulfate equivalents per day were more likely to develop delirium than patients who received more analgesia (RR 5.4, 95% CI 2.4-12.3). Patients who received meperidine were at increased risk of developing delirium as compared with patients who received other opioid analgesics (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.5). In cognitively intact patients, severe pain significantly increased the risk of delirium (RR 9.0, 95% CI 1.8-45.2). CONCLUSIONS: Using admission data, clinicians can identify patients at high risk for delirium following hip fracture. Avoiding opioids or using very low doses of opioids increased the risk of delirium. Cognitively intact patients with undertreated pain were nine times more likely to develop delirium than patients whose pain was adequately treated. Undertreated pain and inadequate analgesia appear to be risk factors for delirium in frail older adults.

Aged↗

Costs associated with delirium in mechanically ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs associated with delirium in mechanically ventilated medical intensive care unit patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: Patients were 275 consecutive mechanically ventilated medical intensive care unit patients. INTERVENTIONS: We prospectively examined patients for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Delirium was categorized as "ever vs. never" and by a cumulative delirium severity index. Costs were determined from individual ledger-level patient charges using cost-center-specific cost-to-charge ratios and were reported in year 2001 U.S. dollars. Fifty-one of 275 patients (18.5%) had persistent coma and died in the hospital and were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 224 patients, delirium developed in 183 (81.7%) and lasted a median of 2.1 (interquartile range, 1-3) days. Baseline demographics were similar between those with and without delirium. Intensive care unit costs (median, interquartile range) were significantly higher for those with at least one episode of delirium ($22,346, $15,083-$35,521) vs. those with no delirium ($13,332, $8,837-$21,471, p <.001). Total hospital costs were also higher in those who developed delirium ($41,836, $22,782-$68,134 vs. $27,106, $13,875-$37,419, p =.002). Higher severity and duration of delirium were associated with incrementally greater costs (all p <.001). After adjustment for age, comorbidity, severity of illness, degree of organ dysfunction, nosocomial infection, hospital mortality, and other potential confounders, delirium was associated with 39% higher intensive care unit (95% confidence interval, 12-72%) and 31% higher hospital (95% confidence interval, 1-70%) costs. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is a common clinical event in mechanically ventilated medical intensive care unit patients and is associated with significantly higher intensive care unit and hospital costs. Future efforts to prevent or treat intensive care unit delirium have the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs of care.

APACHE↗

Delirium in inpatients with respiratory diseases.

The features of delirium in patients being hospitalized due to respiratory diseases were investigated. From the inpatients in the respiratory medical ward of Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo General Hospital over the course of 1 year, the patients who had delirium were diagnosed by a semistructured interview. The total number of subjects was 454, and patients with delirium were 43. Various clinical factors were compared between the delirium group and non-delirium group. In the delirium group, there were many elderly patients of 70 years or older. Moreover, there were many patients who had a chronic respiratory disease, patients in which the respiratory diseases were mutually complicated, and patients in whom other diseases combined with the respiratory disease in the delirium group. There were also many patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and patients with an endotracheal intubation or extubation. Based on the results of a multiple logistic regression analysis, for age, ICU accommodation, and endotracheal intubation, the value of the delirium group was more significant than that of the non-delirium group. In half of the patients from the delirium group, delirium developed within 1 week after hospitalization. In the patients who died in the hospital, however, delirium often developed days after they had been hospitalized. It was suggested that the later developed delirium had a relation to the prognosis.

Adolescent↗

Delirium in hospitalized older persons: outcomes and predictors.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was fourfold; to determine the rate of delirium among hospitalized older persons, to contrast the clinical outcomes of patients with and without delirium, to identify clinical predictors of delirium, and to validate the predictive model in an independent sample of patients. DESIGN: Two prospective cohort studies SETTING: Medical and surgical wards of 2 university teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: In the derivation cohort, 432 patients were enrolled from the University of Chicago Hospitals. Patients 65 years of age or older admitted to 1 of 4 wards were eligible. Subjects were excluded if they were discharged within 48 hours of admission, unavailable to the research assistants during the first 2 days of hospitalization, or judged too impaired to participate in the daily interviews. In the test cohort, 323 patients 70 years of age or older admitted to Yale-New Haven Hospital were studied. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were screened for delirium daily and referred to experienced clinician investigators if acute mental status changes were observed. The clinician investigators assessed the patient for delirium based on DSM-III-R criteria. Duration of hospitalization was adjusted for diagnosis-related groups (DRG) and mortality rates were determined at discharge and 90 days after discharge. Sociodemographic characteristics, cognitive and functional status, comorbidity, depression, and alcoholism were examined as predictors of delirium. MAIN RESULTS: The rate of delirium in the derivation cohort was 15%; subjects with delirium had longer hospital stays and an increased risk of in-hospital death. Cognitive impairment, burden of comorbidity, depression, and alcoholism were found to be independent predictors of delirium. The ability of the model to stratify patients as low, moderate, or high risk for developing delirium was validated in the test cohort in which the rate of delirium was 26%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high rate of delirium among hospitalized older persons and the associated adverse outcomes of prolonged hospital stays and increased risk of death. Patients can be stratified according to their risk for developing delirium using relatively few clinical characteristics which should be assessed, on all hospitalized older persons.

Aged↗

Delirium is independently associated with poor functional recovery after hip fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of delirium in the natural history of functional recovery after hip fracture surgery, independent of prefracture status. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Orthopedic surgery service at a large academic tertiary hospital, with follow-up extending into rehabilitation hospitals, nursing homes, and the community. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-six consenting subjects older than 65 years (mean age 79 +/- 8 years, 79% women) admitted emergently for surgical repair of hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Detailed assessment at enrollment to ascertain prefracture status through interviews with the patient and designated proxy and review of the medical record. Interviews included administration of standardized instruments (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, Blessed Dementia Rating Scale, Delirium Symptom Interview) and assessment of ambulation, and prefracture living situation. Medical comorbidity, the nature of the hip fracture, and the surgical repair were obtained from the medical record. All subjects underwent daily interviews for the duration of the hospitalization, including the Mini-Mental State Examination and Delirium Symptom Interview, and delirium was diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Methods algorithm. Patients and proxies were recontacted 1 and 6 months after fracture, and underwent interviews similar to those at enrollment to determine death, persistent delirium, decline in ADL function, decline in ambulation, or new nursing home placement. RESULTS: Delirium occurred in 52/126 (41%) of patients, and persisted in 20/52 (39%) at hospital discharge, 15/52 (32%) at 1 month, and 3/52 (6%) at 6 months. Patients aged 80 years or older, and those with prefracture cognitive impairment, ADL functional impairment, and high medical comorbidity were more likely to develop delirium. However, after adjusting for these factors, delirium was still significantly associated with outcomes indicative of poor functional recovery 1 month after hip fracture: ADL decline (odds ratio (OR) = 2.6; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1- 6.1), decline in ambulation (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.03-6.5), and death or new nursing home placement (OR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.4). Patients whose delirium persisted at 1 month had worse outcomes than those whose delirium had resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is common, persistent, and independently associated with poor functional recovery 1 month after hip fracture even after adjusting for prefracture frailty. Further research is necessary to identify the mechanisms by which delirium contributes to poor functional recovery, and to determine whether interventions designed to prevent or reduce delirium can improve recovery after hip fracture.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Incidence, clinical features and subtypes of delirium in elderly patients treated for hip fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, risk factors and clinical features (subtypes) of delirium during the postoperative period after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients (9 men and 25 women) were included in this study between June 16 to July 14, 2003. All patients underwent surgery for a fractured neck of femur and were pre- and postoperatively cared for at a combined geriatric/orthopedic ward. ASSESSMENT: The diagnosis of delirium was based on the criteria of the DSM-IV and the Confusion Assessment Method Scale. Subtypes of delirium were classified according to the criteria proposed by Lipowski: hyperactive-hyperalert (or agitated), hypoactive-hypoalert (somnolent) and mixed delirium. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent (n = 19) of the 34 patients developed delirium after surgery. The development of delirium was associated with the medication midazolam taken perioperatively. Nine (47%) of the delirious patients had a hyperactive type of delirium; 5 (26%) developed a hypoactive delirium, and 5 (26%) had a mixed type. We did not find any association among subtypes of delirium and clinical features. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is a common complication in the postoperative period of elderly patients treated for hip fractures. The use of midazolam in the perioperative period increased the risk of developing postoperative delirium. The hyperactive type of delirium was the most common subtype of delirium.

Age Factors↗

Thiamine absorption in alcoholic delirium patients.

OBJECTIVE: The role of a deficiency of vitamin B1 in the development of alcoholic complaints is confined to the case of the Wernicke-Korsakov syndrome. Findings concerning a deficiency of thiamine in alcoholics in comparison with normal persons are contradictory and there are no differentiated tests in the case of delirium tremens. In this study the vitamin B1 absorption in patients with delirium tremens was of interest in connection with the presence or absence of hallucinations and autonomic symptoms. METHOD: Male patients (N = 70) with delirium tremens were compared with a group of 13 controls. The controls and patients were hospitalized in order to ensure abstinence from alcohol. The examination of the delirium patients was carried out with their consent after termination of the delirium tremens and again on discontinuance of drug therapy. In the case of 33 delirium patients the absorption of thiamine was tested again 4 weeks after the first examination. RESULTS: The absorption of vitamin B1 was in general only minimally lower in the case of the delirium patients in comparison with the nonalcoholics. The results showed, however, a considerably greater range of scattering of vitamin B1 absorption in the delirium patients. The absorption conditions showed marked improvement in the 4 weeks after delirium. The extent of absorption of vitamin B1 showed no influence on the duration of delirium. The patients with visual hallucinations, however, showed lower thiamine absorption than patients without such symptoms, whereas no dependence of autonomic symptoms on vitamin B1 absorption was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The disturbed absorption conditions in the delirium patients were obvious at the time of the examination as demonstrated by the wide range of absorption values. Improvement or near normal conditions were registered 4 weeks after the delirium. The absorption conditions had possibly already improved during the few days of alcohol abstinence in the course of the delirium treatment. The reduced vitamin B1 absorption of patients suffering from visual hallucination corresponds to observations of alcoholic hallucinosis.

Adult↗

[Psychiatric hospitalization for delirium in Israel].

Despite growing recognition that patients in delirium merit the full facilities of general hospitals, they still continue to be admitted to psychiatric hospitals. The Israel national psychiatric case register data of psychiatric in-patients with delirium was examined. During 1984-1993, 805 patients with a diagnosis of delirium were admitted to psychiatric hospitals, constituting 0.86% of total psychiatric admissions. 4 major categories were identified: dementia with delirium (33.4%) delirium tremens (DT; 26.9%), drug-induced delirium (10.0%) and acute and, subacute delirium (29.5%). About half were under 65 years of age. Clinical variables associated with emergency psychiatric hospitalization were not found in most cases. Average in-patient stay for dementia with delirium was longer than the national average for active psychiatric hospitalization. A significant proportion of patients in all categories were hospitalized longer than a month. In dementia with delirium, there were both high rates of death (18.1%) and of referrals to general hospitals (20.8%). The referral rate of cases of acute and subacute delirium to general hospitals was also high (16.2%). These outcome variables were much lower in DT and drug-induced delirium. The issue of "justification" of psychiatric hospitalization of cases of delirium is discussed. More accurate screening is suggested, as well as wider collaboration with other facilities responsible for the management of delirious patients.

Acute Disease↗

Occurrence, causes, and outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer: a prospective study.

CONTEXT: Delirium impedes communication and contributes to symptom distress in patients with advanced cancer. There are few prospective data on the reversal of delirium in this population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the occurrence, precipitating factors, and reversibility of delirium in patients with advanced cancer. DESIGN: Prospective serial assessment in a consecutive cohort of 113 patients with advanced cancer. Precipitating factors were examined using standardized criteria; 104 patients met eligibility criteria. SETTING: Acute palliative care unit in a university-affiliated teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delirium occurrence and reversal rates, duration, and patient survival. Strengths of association of various precipitating factors with reversal were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: On admission, delirium was diagnosed in 44 patients (42%), and of the remaining 60, delirium developed in 27 (45%). Reversal of delirium occurred in 46 (49%) of 94 episodes in 71 patients. Terminal delirium occurred in 46 (88%) of the 52 deaths. In univariate analysis, psychoactive medications, predominantly opioids (HR, 8.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-36.74), and dehydration (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.20-4.62) were associated with reversibility. Hypoxic encephalopathy (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.80) and metabolic factors (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.91) were associated with nonreversibility. In mulitivariate analysis, psychoactive medications (HR, 6.65; 95% CI, 1.49-29.62), hypoxic encephalopathy (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.70), and nonrespiratory infection (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.64) had independent associations. Patients with delirium had poorer survival rates than controls (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is a frequent, multifactorial complication in advanced cancer. Despite its terminal presentation in most patients, delirium is reversible in approximately 50% of episodes. Delirium precipitated by opioids and other psychoactive medications and dehydration is frequently reversible with change of opioid or dose reduction, discontinuation of unnecessary psychoactive medication, or hydration, respectively.

Aged↗

A retrospective study of the psychiatric management and outcome of delirium in the cancer patient.

This report describes the evaluation and treatment of delirium in the cancer patient in a major comprehensive cancer center. Ninety consecutive cases of delirium seen by the inpatient psychiatry consultation/liaison service were analyzed in a retrospective fashion to evaluate demographic information, alcohol use, central nervous system disease, coexisting medical disease, and past psychiatric history. Delirium cases were divided into hyperalert, hypoalert, and mixed subtypes. For these three subtypes, medication profiles including dose of medication, duration of delirium, outcome, and the venue where the delirium began were also evaluated. The hyperalert subtype of delirium was the commonest type observed (71%) and had the shortest duration (P < 0.0001) and best outcome (P < 0.001). The patients with a hyperalert delirium subtype were treated with the least amount of haloperidol (P < 0.0001). Patients were delirious for longer when the delirium began in the intensive-care units (P < 0.04). In general, patients who received no haloperidol experienced delirium of longer duration (P < 0.02) than those receiving haloperidol. Since the data represent patients who were referred for psychiatric treatment, this may explain the increased number of hyperalert deliriums and, therefore, the generalizability of the results is limited. Delirium in the cancer patient is particularly problematic given the coexisting medical problems these patients experience. Because the outcome of delirium is better when the duration is shorter, it is important for clinicians to be sensitive to early symptoms so that treatment can be implemented faster, leading to less morbidity and mortality.

Adult↗

Delirium in the first days of acute stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delirium is an acute, transient disorder of cognition and consciousness with fluctuating intensity. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence and the risk factors for delirium in the first days after stroke onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed delirium prospectively in a sample of 218 consecutive patients (mean age 57 years) with an acute (</= 4 days) stroke (28 subarachnoid haemorrhages, 48 intracerebral haemorrhages, 142 cerebral infarcts) and in a control group of 50 patients with acute coronary syndromes with the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) (cut-off score >/= 10). RESULTS: 29 (13%) acute stroke patients (mean DRS score = 13.2, SD = 2.3) and only one (2 %) acute coronary patient had delirium (chi(2) = 5.2, p = 0.02). In nine patients delirium was secondary to stroke without any additional cause, in 10 patients there were also medical complications and in the remaining 10 there were multiple potential causes for delirium. Delirium was more frequent after hemispherical than after brainstem/cerebellum strokes (p = 0.02). No other statistically significant associations with stroke locations were found. Medical complications (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 1.8 to 10.2), neglect (OR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.3 to 9.2), intracerebral haemorrhage (OR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.3 to 7.5) and age >/= 65 (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.0 to 5.8) were independent factors to the development of delirium in stroke patients. CONCLUSION: Delirium was more frequent in stroke than in coronary acute patients. Among stroke patients, delirium was most frequent in older patients, in those with neglect, with medical complications and with intracerebral haemorrhages. These findings indicated that delirium in acute stroke patients 1) is not a non-specific consequence of acute disease and hospitalisation and 2) is secondary to hemisphere brain damage and to metabolic disturbances due to medical complications.

Acute Disease↗

Prevalence of delirium in a geriatric convalescence hospitalization unit: patient's clinical characteristics and risk precipitating factor analysis.

The aim was to evaluate the prevalence of delirium among patients discharged from an acute care hospital and admitted to a geriatric convalescence unit (GCU), and to analyze patient's characteristics and risk precipitating factors. Sixty-eight patients were analyzed during a 2-week period. The confusion assessment method (CAM) was used to detect delirium. The precipitating factors evaluated were: major surgery-intensive care unit(ICU) stay, pulmonary and heart failure, acute infections, metabolic disorders/anemia,psychoactive medications, other drugs, severe pain, changing environmental influences and others. According to CAM, fifteen patients presented delirium (22%), and in 14 of them(93.3 %) the delirium was developed before admission at GCU. The precipitating factors in the studied population were the following: changing environmental influences in 66 patients(97%) (15 with delirium and 51 without delirium); other drugs 56 (82.3 %) (11 vs. 45);others 56 (82.3%) (9 vs. 24); psychoactive medications 50 (73.5%) (12 vs. 38); acute infections 48 (70.5 %) (13 vs. 35); metabolic disorders/anemia 40 (58.8 %) (9 vs. 31); major surgery-ICU stay 28 (41 .1%) (8 vs. 20); severe pain 26 (38.2%) (6 vs. 20); pulmonary and heart failure 22 (32.3%) (5 vs. 17). The univariant analysis showed that, none of the precipitating factors studied was significantly related to delirium. Seventy-two patients (91.1%) had simultaneously >3 precipitating factors. There were 16 patients with >6 precipitating factors, 7 of 15 with delirium and 9 of the 53 without delirium (46.6 % vs 16.9 %) (p < 0.05). The prevalence of delirium has been 22 %. Most of the patients had developed delirium before the admission at GCU. A high proportion of patients had >3 precipitating factors. In the study the presence of > 6 precipitating factors simultaneously has been significantly related to delirium.

Aged↗