Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Compomers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Marginal adaptation of compomer Class V restorations in vitro.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the marginal adaptation of different adhesives, including recently developed self-etching primers, in combination with compomers in Class V cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 80 extracted human teeth, divided into 10 groups of 8, Class V cavities were prepared (ca. 4 mm high, 3 mm wide, and 1.5 mm deep) with one half of the margin length in dentin. The one-bottle adhesives Prime & Bond 2.1, Syntac SC, and Espe OSB, and the self-etching primers Rasant F 2000 and Prompt L Pop were used in combination with compomers. Before and after thermocycling (TC), replicas were taken and a quantitative margin analysis using the SEM was performed at a magnification of 200x using defined criteria. RESULTS: The statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests showed a significantly (p < 0.05) better marginal adaptation in enamel and dentin for the self-etching primers, and when the one-bottle adhesives were used in combination with the total-etch technique. CONCLUSION: Self-etching primers improve the marginal adaptation of compomer restorations in enamel.

Compomers↗
PubMed2000

Compomer materials and secondary caries formation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of compomers in secondary caries formation in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 human teeth with caries-free enamel (coronal) and root surfaces underwent a fluoride-free prophylaxis. Class V cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual coronal and root surfaces. The teeth were divided into two groups with 3 treatment subdivisions [12 teeth per restorative material (6 with coronal restorations and 6 with root surface restorations)]). The preparations were restored with: (1) filled composite (Filtek Z250 with Single Bond), (2) fluoride-releasing compomer [Hytac with Prompt L-Pop (fluoride-releasing water-based adhesive)]; or (3) fluoride-releasing compomer [Dyract AP with Prime & Bond NT (fluoride-releasing acetone-based adhesive)]. 24 cavities (6 teeth with 2 cavities/tooth) were available with each treatment. The teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles at 5-50 degrees C) in synthetic saliva prior to artificial caries formation. After lesion formation, 5 longitudinal sections were taken from each specimen for polarized light evaluation. Mean surface lesion depths and wall lesion frequencies were determined. RESULTS: The Filtek Z250 group had significantly (P < 0.05, ANOVA, DMR) greater mean body of the lesion depths in coronal (205 microm) and root surfaces (221 microm) than either the Hytac (119 microm coronal and 161 microm root surfaces) or the Dyract AP (127 microm coronal and 149 microm root surfaces) groups. Likewise, wall lesion frequency was significantly higher (P < 0.05, ANOVA, DMR) for the Filtek Z250 group (41% coronal and 37% root surfaces) compared with either the Hytac (31% coronal and 25% root surfaces) or Dyract AP (26% coronal and 21% root surfaces) groups. No differences in outer body of the lesion depths or wall lesion frequencies were found between Hytac and Dyract AP for coronal and root surface restorations (P > 0.05, ANOVA, DMR).

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

[An assessment of fluoride release from a compomer and four resin-modified glass-ionomers].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the fluoride release into water from a compomer (Dyract) and four resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, VariGlass, Vitremer). METHODS: Five specimens of each material were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions and placed into 3.0 mm diameter x 2.7 mm thick disposable Teflon molds. The specimens were placed in well-sealed polypropylene vials with 2 ml of de-ionized water and stored in an incubator at 37 degrees C. The solutions were replaced weekly and the levels of fluoride (ppm) were analysed at day 1, 7, 30 and subsequently every 28 days for 253 days. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls range test. RESULTS: All materials except the compomer (Dyract) showed high initial release values of fluoride which decreased exponentially, then showed a slow decline during the ensuing time. Initial fluoride release values were significantly different between Dyract, VariGlass, and the three other resin-modified glass-ionomers. The compomer released significantly less fluoride than did the other resin-modified glass-ionomers. CONCLUSION: With high caries risk patients, it may be most beneficial to use a high fluoride release resin-modified glass-ionomer cement as the restorative material of choice.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2003

Compomers: adhesion and setting reactions.

The term compomer is misleading as it suggests a combination of glass-ionomer and composite technology. This has led to confusion as to its clinical uses as well as the way it bonds to tooth structure. However, the properties and adhesion of compomers to tooth structure suggest a closer link to composites than to glass-ionomers. The clinical significance of this is that compomers lack direct chemical adhesion to any tooth structure and therefore needs to be bonded to tooth structure similar to composites via a separate bonding agent. Their closeness to composites however, does not make them composite substitutes or replacements. Dentists should strictly follow instructions by the manufacturers because failure of materials can mostly be blamed on the clinician rather than on the material.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Multi-colored dual-cured compomer.

A new polyacid-modified resin-based composite (compomer) restorative material has been introduced. Unlike other compomers, this material undergoes both chemical polymerization and photocuring hardening reactions. The new compomer is called MagicFil, and its chief attraction to children is that it is manufactured in 4 different colors, all with glitter inclusions.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2005

[Use of compomers in treatment of early childhood dental caries].

The purpose of this survey is to establish the effectiveness of the treatment of early childhood caries using compomers. The target group consists of 28 children aged from 20 to 47 months and presenting "early childhood caries". The team has done 126 fillings of vital frontal and distal teeth (61 of frontal and 65 of distal teeth) using the Glasiosite compomer by Voco. Fillings are evaluated immediately after polishing and after six after twelve months. Evaluation is achieved according to the Ryge classification scale, which reflects the type, the clinical status and the development of the filling. The information is processed through alternative analysis at importance level p<0.05. Our survey shows that most of the fillings can be classified as perfect. The remaining fillings made within the period of the survey are classified as satisfactory and do not need to be replaced. No unsatisfactory filling was found. Based on the features of the above compomers and the results of our survey we recommend them for filling of vital teeth of up to three-year old children.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2006

Effect of different bonding conditions on the shear bond strength of two compomers to bovine dentin.

AIM: Despite the improvements to compomer materials, the bond strength of these materials remains inferior to "composite/resin bonding" systems and limits their clinical use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acidic conditioning with phosphoric acid and Prompt L-Pop (PLP) on the shear bond strength of two compomers Dyract AP (DAP) and Composan Glass (CG) to dentin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty extracted bovine teeth were used to test the shear bond strength of two compomers to flat dentin labial surfaces. The dentin specimens were randomly assigned to six groups of ten specimens each: Group 1: DAP and Prime & Bond NT (PBNT); Group 2: DAP/PBNT with a 15 second dentin etch prior to bonding; Group 3: DAP placed with PLP adhesive; Group 4: CG and Compobond NE (CBNE); Group 5: CG/CBNE with a 15 second dentin etch; and Group 6: CG placed with PLP adhesive. The specimens were stored at 37 masculineC with 100% humidity for 24 hours then mounted and sheared using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were recorded in Mega Pascals (MPa). The sheared specimens were examined under a light microscope, and the type of failure (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed) was recorded. RESULTS: The mean dentin shear bond strength value (MPa) for the groups was: Group 1 (11.6+/-3.9); Group 2 (13.2+/-3.3); Group 3 (12.4+/-2.0); Group 4 (13.0+/-4.3); Group 5 (19.3+/-3.7); and Group 6 (13.1+/-3.0). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests detected a significantly higher bond strength (P = 0.003) for group 5. For groups 1, 3, 4, and 6, the mode of failure was mostly adhesive. When acid etching of dentin was performed (groups 2 and 5), cohesive fracture within dentin was the predominant mode of failure. Acid etching and the use of PLP significantly reduced the number of adhesive fractures and reduced variability in the shear bond strength results. CONCLUSIONS: Acid etching significantly increased the shear bond strength of CG to dentin but did not affect DAP. The application of PLP resulted in a shear bond strength not statistically different from PBNT or CPNE. CG bond to dentin is improved with acid etching using phosphoric acid. However, PLP provided no significant improvement in the shear bond strength of DAP and CG.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed1997

Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a compomer to dental enamel, dentin, and cementum. Flat surfaces of these tissues were obtained from recently extracted human teeth. The different substrates were either treated with PSA (a primer and adhesive) or acid etched (35% phosphoric acid gel) and treated with PSA. Cylindrical specimens of compomer were then bonded to the substrates. Shear bond strength was determined after a 24-hour immersion in 37 degrees C water. Significant differences were found between both treatments on enamel, while none were found on dentin or cementum. The use of acid etchant on enamel as a surface-conditioning step previous to priming with PSA allowed a better bond between Dyract compomer and that substrate; acid etching was not particularly needed on dentin and cementum.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed1998

Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements.

OBJECTIVES: Although research interest in biocompatibility of dental materials has been increasing, findings are frequently controversial and non-harmonized experimental approaches often lead to the production of contradictory results. The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxic effects of six different light-cured dental composites, one compomer, one advanced glass-ionomer, two glass-ionomer cements, two zinc phosphate cements, one calcium hydroxide liner, one composite cement and one carboxylate cement with the same standardized cell-culture system. Two composites, one compomer and one advanced glass-ionomer were also tested in combination with the appropriate bonding substances and surface primers. METHODS: Specimens were added to the cultures immediately after production or after preincubation for 1, 2 or 7 days or 6 weeks under cell-culture conditions. Specimens were incubated with L-929 fibroblasts for 72 h and cell numbers determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: All freshly prepared composite materials were cytotoxic. These effects diminished with increased preincubation times and were not significant after 7 days. Combinations of composites and bonding substances were still cytotoxic after preincubation for 7 days, but not after 6 weeks. Combinations of compomers and bonding substances demonstrated stronger toxicity than composites, although these effects were reduced earlier during preincubation. Glass-ionomer and phosphate cements showed similar effects to the composites with the exception of carboxylate cement, which demonstrated severe and persistent effects even after 6 weeks' preincubation. Together, our data provide evidence that all dental materials tested are cytotoxic immediately after production and that these effects are reduced after different preincubation periods in most cases. SIGNIFICANCE: Tested with a standardized cell-culture system, differences in toxicological potency between various commonly used dental materials were observed. Cytotoxicity data from standardized protocols should form the basis of screening the cytotoxic effects of new materials.

Adhesives↗
PubMed1998

Component release from light-activated glass ionomer and compomer cements.

The purpose of this study was to identify and quantify any component released from seven commercially available light-cured or resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer cements. Twenty-one separate cylindrical stainless steel moulds 6 mm in diameter and 1.0 mm deep were filled with one of seven glass ionomer or compomer cements, light activated and then immediately immersed in separate containers of distilled water. Water samples were retrieved over a time period of up to 30 days and retained for analysis. An occlusal cavity 6 mm in diameter was prepared in extracted human third molar teeth with a remaining dentin thickness of 1.6-2.0 mm. A polypropylene chamber was attached to the cemento-enamel junction of each tooth to contain 1 mL of distilled water. Ten teeth were each filled with one of three cements and light activated. Water samples (eluates) were retrieved over a period of time. All samples were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography. Only one component, hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), was detected in the eluates from both tooth and mould samples. Analysis of diffusion of the HEMA through dentin showed a relatively sustained movement into the pulp space during the first day, with exponential decline thereafter. Our data show that HEMA was released from all of the light activated glass ionomer cements studied and from the compomer, both directly into water and through dentin. This release may be relevant both to the risk of adverse pulpal responses in patients and to the risk of allergy in patients and dental personnel.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2002

In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures.

UNLABELLED: The penetration of a sealant into the tooth fissures can establish longer retention time for a pit and fissure sealant restoration. AIM: This in vitro study was to evaluate the penetration ability of two low-viscosity resin materials, a composite and a compomer, applied with and without their bonding agents in comparison to an unfilled resin sealant. METHODS: Forty premolars with shallow/wide (group I) and forty with deep/narrow occlusal fissures (group II) were used. Each group was divided into five subgroups (A-E). The teeth in the subgroups were sealed as follows: A - Delton LC Clear (unfilled resin); B - Dyract flow (compomer); C - Prime&Bond NT (bonding agent) and Dyract flow; D - Tetric flow (resin composite); E - Syntac Sprint (bonding agent) and Tetric flow. Longitudinal sections were cut along the mesiodistal direction of fissures and examined under a videomicroscope. The resin penetration was rated according to the scale "low", "medium", "high", indicating penetration up to one third and two thirds of fissure depth and to the fissure bottom, respectively. RESULTS: These revealed the following: a) the penetration of all sealants was higher in shallow/wide than in deep/narrow fissures; b) the low-viscosity resin materials provided higher penetration than the unfilled resin sealant in shallow/wide fissures, whereas the unfilled resin achieved superior penetration rates in deep/narrow ones; c) the combination of a hydrophilic sealant (Dyract flow) with a hydrophilic bonding agent (Prime&Bond NT) significantly promoted the penetration depth in deep/narrow fissures. CONCLUSION: The penetration ability of all sealants was higher in shallow/wide than in narrow/deep fissures; low-viscosity resin composite and compomer provided higher penetration efficiency than the unfilled resin sealant in shallow/wide fissures, whereas the unfilled resin achieved superior penetration rate in deep/narrow ones. The combination of a hydrophilic sealant with a hydrophilic bonding agent significantly enhanced the penetration depth in deep/narrow fissures.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2007

The effect of temperature on viscoelastic properties of glass ionomer cements and compomers.

The objective of this study was to determine the viscoelastic properties of different types of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and compomers under varying temperature conditions found in the mouth. The materials tested were a conventional GIC (Aqua Ionofil U), a resin modified GIC (Fuji II LC), a highly viscous GIC (Voco Ionofil Molar), and two polyacid modified composite resins/compomers (Glasiosite and Dyract Flow). Six groups of four specimens were prepared from each material. One group was stored dry for 24 h and was subsequently tested dry at 21 degrees C. Each of the remaining five groups was stored for 24 h in distilled water at the temperatures 21, 30.5, 37, 43.5, and 50 degrees C, respectively, and was subsequently tested at that temperature. Shear storage modulus and loss tangent were determined by conducting dynamic torsional loading. Static shear moduli were determined by applying a constant torque (below the proportional limit of the materials) for 10 s and recording the angular deformation of the specimens. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan's test (alpha= 0.05). It was found that the viscoelastic properties varied significantly (p < 0.05) across the different materials. The compomer Glasiosite, with the highest filler content, and the highly viscous GIC Voco Ionofil Molar exhibited the highest elastic moduli and lowest loss tangents. Viscoelastic properties varied also significantly (p < 0.05) with temperature levels, but changes in the tested region were not indicative of a glass transition. Dynamic shear storage moduli were highly correlated to the static ones. Storage in water lowered the values of elastic moduli.

Compomers↗
PubMed2000

Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Microleakage is an important problem with direct filling restorations and an understanding of the factors that contribute to it is of critical importance. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of thermal and occlusal load cycling, and limited cavity preparation on microleakage of compomer Class V restorations in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class V cavities were randomly prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 32 recently extracted molars and premolars and restored with Dyract compomer restorative system as per the manufacturer's directions. Teeth were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups with 8 teeth in each group: (I) thermocycling only; (II) load cycling only; (III) both thermocycling and load cycling; and (IV) no treatment. All teeth were then immersed in 2% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. Dye penetration was measured linearly using color photographic prints. ANOVA, comparisons between means, and correlation were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Thermocycling and cavity preparation had a significant effect on microleakage, but load cycling did not. Occlusal margins leaked more than the gingival margins. CONCLUSION: Class V restorations demonstrated increased microleakage under the conditions of thermal cycling and nonretentive cavity design. More microleakage occurred at occlusal margins than at gingival margins. The effect of load cycling is complicated by considerations of the types of stresses applied and the restorative material response to such stresses.

Compomers↗
PubMed1999

Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) have been introduced to provide esthetic restorations. However, there is concern about the marginal sealing ability of these materials, especially at the dentin (cementum) aspects of restorations. PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the microleakage of Class V restorations made with resin-modified glass ionomers or a compomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty noncarious human molar teeth were used. Standardized kidney-shaped Class V cavity preparations were placed in the buccal and lingual surfaces at the cementoenamel junction. Teeth were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups of 10 teeth each and restored as follows: group 1, Fuji II LC; group 2, Vitremer; and group 3, Dyract. In all cases, the manufacturers' instructions were strictly followed. All materials were placed in a single increment. Unfinished restorations were immediately coated with the respective manufacturers' sealer or varnish and this was either light cured for 20 seconds or allowed to air-dry. After 24 hours, teeth were finished to contour and to the cavosurface margins, coated with nail varnish except for 1 mm around the restoration margin, thermocycled (1000x, 5-55 degrees C) and placed in a solution of 2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours at room temperature. The staining along the tooth restoration interface was recorded. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences among all restorative materials for the overall, occlusal, and gingival scores (P =.03, P =.01, P =.01, respectively). Occlusal and gingival scores for each matched pair of restorative materials using the Wilcoxon test showed statistically significant differences between Fuji II LC glass ionomer cement and Dyract composite, both for the occlusal (P =.005) and gingival (P =.005) margins and also as an overall evaluation (P =.01), with Fuji II LC showing the least dye penetration. Vitremer revealed dye penetration scores not significantly different from Fuji II LC glass ionomer cement or Dyract composite. CONCLUSION: Resin-modified glass ionomers showed less or similar microleakage than the polyacid-modified composite resin tested.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effect of two factors: conditioning methods and light-curing techniques on the marginal adaptation of Dyract AP (Dentsply DeTrey, Germany). The 'pulse activation' curing technique was compared with a conventional light-curing technique for their effectiveness in reducing marginal gaps in restorations that were conditioned with three different protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical cavities, 3mm in diameter, were prepared in extracted human molar teeth. They were restored with Dyract AP using Prime&Bond NT (PBNT; Dentsply DeTrey) as the adhesive. Cavities were etched with: Conditioner36/PBNT (group 1), Non-Rinse Conditioner (NRC)/PBNT (group 2), and PBNT only (group 3). Either conventional or the 'pulse activation' technique was used for light-curing of the material. Epoxy resin replicas were obtained from longitudinal sections of the specimens, and the restoration-tooth interfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Marginal qualities along the resin-dentin interfaces were further measured using image analysis and analyzed using nonparametric statistical methods. RESULTS: With the conventional curing technique, enamel margin fractures were frequently observed. Marginal gaps were found along the compomer-dentin interfaces irrespective of the conditioning protocol. A significantly lower percentage of gap-containing margins were found in cavities that were conditioned with 36% phosphoric acid. With the 'pulse activation' technique, no marginal gap was found along compomer-dentin interfaces that were etched with either Conditioner36 or NRC. More than 90% of the total margin length were excellent. No cohesive failure of enamel could be observed along cavosurface margins. SIGNIFICANCE: The 'pulse activation' curing technique significantly improves the marginal integrity of Dyract AP when Conditioner36/Prime&Bond NT and NRC/Prime&Bond NT are used as conditioning/bonding systems. The use of Prime&Bond NT without etching is not recommended, as marginal gaps are present irrespective of the curing techniques employed.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2003

Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured compomer restorative materials.

OBJECTIVE: The magnitude and kinetics of polymerization contraction stress build-up may be potential predictors of bond failure of adhesive restorations. The present study determined these properties of seven commercial compomers (Dyract, Dyract AP, F2000 Rasant, Hytac, Compoglass F, Luxat, Glasiosite). METHODS: Polymerization shrinkage was generated by 40 s light curing the test materials (800 mW/cm2). The contraction force induced was recorded for 300 s at room temperature (23-24 degrees C) by means of a Stress-Strain-Analyzer (C factor=0.33). Maximum contraction stress (MPa), coefficient of near linear fit of contraction force/time (gradient) and relative force rate (%/s) of each material were compared with that of two hybrid composites (Tetric Ceram, Prodigy). The statistical analysis was conducted by ANOVA (alpha=0.05) and post hoc Tukey's test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in the maximum stress between Glasiosite (2.27+/-0.06 MPa), Hytac (2.31+/-0.07 MPa) and Tetric Ceram (2.21+/-0.11 MPa), and between Compoglass F (2.60+/-0.18 MPa) and Prodigy (2.70+/-0.06 MPa) were found. The contraction stress of F2000 Rasant (3.41+/-0.09 MPa) and Luxat (3.33+/-0.08 MPa) were significantly highest, whilst Dyract exhibited the significantly lowest shrinkage stress (1.27+/-0.08 MPa) among the tested materials. SIGNIFICANCE: High contraction stress, early start of stress build-up and rapid contraction force development may lead to failure of bond to tooth structure. This study suggested that the contraction stress and kinetic behavior of compomers are generally similar to those of hybrid composites in a dry condition. Dyract might be superior in maintaining the bond with cavity walls compared to conventional hybrid composites in view of its low shrinkage stress.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of particle size, particle material and morphology on the sliding wear of 19 light curing, commercially available composites (Durafill VS, Metafil CX, Heliomolar RO, Solitaire, Arabesk, Artglass, Charisma F, Pertac II, Charisma, Degufill Ultra, TPH Spectrum, Z100, Tetric classic, Pertac Hybrid, Estilux Hybrid, Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Compoglass and Hytac). METHODS: The materials were applied to an aluminum sample holder (7.5 mm diameter, 2 mm depth) in one layer and polymerized in a Dentacolor XS light curing unit for 180 s. The surface was ground flat (#1000) to remove any matrix rich surface layer. Then samples were stored in Ringer's solution for 24 h at 37 degrees C. Occlusal contact wear was simulated in a sliding wear tester (Munich Artificial Mouth). Eight specimens of each material were tested in a pin-on-block design with oscillating sliding of a Degussit antagonist (5 mm diameter) at a vertical load of 50 N. The horizontal excursion of the antagonist was 8 mm. Wear was quantified by a replica technique every 6000, 10,000, 30,000 and 50,000 cycles using a 3D-laser scanner. The materials were compared by their mean wear after 50,000 cycles. Comparisons of different composites and compomers were performed using analysis of variance and t-tests including the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The microfiller composites (Durafill VS, Metafil CX, Heliomolar RO) revealed the lowest, and the compomers (Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Compoglass and Hytac) showed the highest contact wear (p < 0.05). The wear of the hybrid composite (Estilux Hybrid) and the micro hybrid composites (Solitaire, Arabesk, Artglass, Charisma F, Pertac II, Charisma, Degufill Ultra, TPH Spectrum, Z100, Tetric classic, Pertac Hybrid) was higher than that of the microfiller composites (p < 0.05). The results showed additional significant differences within the three groups of composites. The coefficient of determination between loss of height and maximum particle size was r2 = 0.41. SIGNIFICANCE: Both particle size and morphology have a high influence on the wear properties concerning the two-body wear in the occlusal contact area.

Compomers↗
PubMed1999

Effect of storage media on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of four polyacid-modified composite resins ("compomers").

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this investigation were to measure the surface microhardness (Vickers) as well as the release of fluoride from four polyacid-modified composite resins (PMC) ("compomers") (Compoglass F, F 2000, Dyract AP, experimental compomer) after storage in various artificial saliva (buffers) including one esterase-buffer. METHODS: Samples were stored for 6 days in de-ionized water, acidic buffer I (pH 4.2), neutral buffer II (pH 7.0), or neutral buffer III (pH 7.0) containing porcine esterase. The specimens were transferred into fresh media every 48 h. Fluoride release was measured every 48 h. Vickers hardness of each five samples of every group was determined before storing the samples in media (baseline) as well as after storage for 24, 48, and 144 h in the various solutions. Dry-stored specimens served as control. RESULTS: The surface microhardness of all PMCs significantly decreased after storage in the various media. No significant differences, however, were found between samples of the same material stored in the various media for 6 days. In general, the highest fluoride quantity was released into the acidic buffer I except for Dyract AP, which segregated similar quantities of fluoride into buffer I and into de-ionized water. More fluoride was released into de-ionized water than into neutral buffers. Further, esterase treatment increased fluoride release from three PMCs. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that the action of salivary esterases may weaken the surface of polyacid-modified composite resin restorations. As a clinical consequence, wear may be enhanced and load resistance may be reduced. In addition, fluoride release from PMCs may be increased by hydrolytic enzymes in saliva and under acidic conditions.

Analysis of Variance↗