Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colostomy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Double-barreled wet colostomy: a safe and simple method after pelvic exenteration.

UNLABELLED: The clinical and functional outcome of ureteric division to the distal segment of a loop colostomy: the double-barrelled wet colostomy have been analysed. METHODS: 13 patients (8 female and 5 male, age 37 to 72 years) underwent pelvic exenteration with double-barrelled wet colostomy. The primary tumour included endometrial (n = 6), rectal (n = 1), anal (n = 1), cervical (n = 2), prostatic (n = 1) and bladder (n = 2). Indications for pelvic exenteration were locally advanced disease, recurrence and severe radiation or surgical damage. Six patients had pre-existing colostomy, and three had a Bricker ureteroileal diversion. The double-barrelled-wet colostomy technique consisted in anastomosing both ureters to a colon segment 25 cm distal to the loop colostomy. There was no operative mortality. Complications included one urinary leak which closed with conservative management and one case of recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis which finally required nephrectomy. Intravenous urography in the remaining patients showed good flow through the ureters to the conduit with no reflux. Postoperative plasma electrolytes, urea and creatinine were normal from day seven onwards. Urodynamic studies in four patients showed efficient contraction of the colon conduit with pressure levels similar to those in the colon proximal to the colostomy. In five cases biopsies of the conduit were taken at 3 and 16 months; no dysplasias were found. Four patients died due to disease progression. The overall mean survival was 41.2 months. The remainder are currently disease-free, maximum followup period being 19 months. Double-barrelled wet colostomy is a safe and simple technique with low morbidity. The patient needs to carry only one stoma and functional results are good.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Colostomy vs self-expanding metallic stents: comparison of the two techniques in acute tumoral left colonic obstruction].

UNLABELLED: Self-expanding metallic stents is an alternative treatment to colostomy that is the treatment of choice in acute tumoral left colonic obstruction. AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and treatment performed after desobstruction using the two methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients admitted for acute obstruction of the left colon were retrospectively separated in two groups depending on the type of intervention performed to treat the obstruction ("colostomy" group: 17 patients and "self-expanding stent group": 16 patients). We studied complications after desobstruction, hospital courses and surgical strategy performed after the acute phase. RESULTS: Time between desobstruction and colectomy was shorter in the "self-expanding stent group" than in the "colostomy group" (18.5 days versus 73 days). Age superior than 75 years and colostomy were the two main factors predicting the risk of definitive colostomy (P < 0.05). Global mean hospital stay was longer in the colostomy group (32.7 days versus 19.3 days, P = 0.02). Two perforations and one local recurrence occurred in the "self-expanding stent group". CONCLUSIONS: Self-expanding metallic stent can decrease the permanent colostomy rate and the number of interventions. The recurrence rate seems to be theoretically increased with the stenting method. Then, colostomy must be done for patients in curative situation. The self-expanding metallic stent should be used as a palliative care.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

The effects of colostomy on the quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of colostomy on the quality of life (QOL) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) by designing a questionnaire that used self-reported data and correlating these data with the clinical information obtained from patients' medical records. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive QOL questionnaire was designed to specifically address the following 5 domains: physical health, psychosocial adjustment, body image, self-efficacy, and recreation/leisure. This questionnaire was completed during a telephone or an in-person interview. The subjective data derived from the questionnaire were correlated with objective medical information obtained from a review of medical records. RESULTS: The QOL improved significantly (t = 9.1 28, P < .0001) after colostomy. All 27 (100%) patients were "satisfied," and 16 (59%) of them were "very satisfied" with colostomy. Nineteen (70%) patients would have preferred to have the colostomy done earlier, and only 3 (11%) patients wished it reversed. Colostomy reduced the number of hospitalizations caused by chronic bowel dysfunction by 70.4%. After colostomy, the average amount of time spent on bowel care was reduced from 117.0 min/day to 12.8 min/day (t = 7.964, P < .0001). All patients stated that colostomy simplified bowel care routine and increased independence. Significant improvements were recorded in the areas of physical health, psychosocial adjustment, and self-efficacy. Stoma prolapse and wound dehiscence were the most common complications of stomal surgery. When compared with medical data, patients were able to reliably recall average time with bowel problems (r = .881, P < .0001) and stomal surgery complications (r = .810, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Colostomy is a safe and effective treatment for chronic bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury. It is well accepted by the patients and significantly improves QOL and bowel management procedures. Correlation analysis indicates that subjective patient-reported data are consistent with objective data obtained from the medical records.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Colostomy closure: is it an intervention without risk?].

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether colostomy closure is an operation with a high risk of complications. DESIGN: Retrospective study of colostomy closures in a 14-year period. PARTICIPANTS: 60 patients, averaging 54 years, males in 63%. The main indication for colostomy was colorectal neoplasm (47%), followed by trauma (23%). RESULTS: There were 15 Hartman's procedure reconstructions, 4 reconstructions of colostomy and mucous fistula, and 41 "simple" colostomy closures. The closure was extraperitoneal in 40%, suturing only the anterior colonic wall in 42%. We had 27 postoperative complications in 33% of the patients, without mortality. The average hospital stay was 8 days longer in the group with complications. The complication rate was 29% in the "simple" closure versus 42% in the reconstruction group (this difference was not statistically significant). The statistic analysis (chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests) showed no influence on morbidity of factors such as age, sex, previous disease, age of colostomy, and type and closure technique of colostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Colostomy closure has a high rate of postoperative complications (33%). These are minor in almost all cases, without mortality.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Colostomy closure on a gynecologic oncology service.

From 7/1/85 to 6/31/92 25 colostomy closures were performed. Twenty-one of the colostomies were performed in relation to gynecologic cancer and the remaining 4 were performed for benign pelvic disease. Nineteen patients underwent simple closure of a transverse loop colostomy. The other 6 patients had their colostomy closed in association with a laparotomy. There were no intraoperative complications related to the colostomy closure. There was 1 postoperative mortality secondary to adult respiratory distress syndrome following reoperation for stricture in the early postoperative period. Three other patients also experienced significant postoperative complications for an overall complication rate of 16%. These included one subcutaneous wound dehiscence, one subcutaneous wound infection, and one anastomotic stricture. One patient required a second colostomy due to recurrence of an obstruction by ovarian cancer in the rectosigmoid area. From the results of this small study, it would appear that colostomy closure is a reasonable endeavor in a selected group of gynecologic cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Protective colostomy closure: the hazards of a "minor" operation.

A retrospective study of 87 patients, subjected to colostomy closure between 1976 and 1987, was conducted in order to evaluate the role of 8 potential risk factors on morbidity and mortality. Possible risk factors were age greater than 65 years, presence of hypoalbuminaemia (less than 3.0 gr%), anaemia (Hb less than 10 gr%), operative technique, duration of colostomy, site of colostomy, underlying disease and presence of subcutaneous drainage. Apart from hypoalbuminaemia, no clear risk factor was identified, although an interval of more than 90 days between construction and closure of colostomy appears to be safer than shorter intervals. A comparison was also made between two different periods from 1976 to 1982 and from 1983 to 1987 which resulted in important changes in patient management in the second period including: type of antibiotic prophylaxis, type of anastomosis and suture material, site of colostomy and mean duration of colostomy. Four post-operative deaths (4.6%) (two for myocardial insufficiency and two for sepsis), 11 major (13%) and 25 (29%) minor complications were recorded. The analysis of the two different periods showed a strong reduction in both mortality and morbidity in the second period, which could be related to a better management of this type of patient. In conclusion, the incidence of mortality and morbidity in colostomy closure cannot be underestimated and therefore the same skill and meticulous approach are required for this operation as for any major surgical procedure on the colon.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

The effect of diverting colostomy on anastomotic healing after resection of left colon obstruction. An experimental study in the rat.

A standardized stenosis of the left colon was created in the rat model. After four days the stenosis was resected and a primary anastomosis made. Half of the animals (n = 21) were randomized to a proximal diverting colostomy and the other half to a non-colostomy control group. On postoperative days two and seven anastomotic complications were recorded and anastomotic strength was determined. Collagen content in the anastomotic area was measured. In the colostomy group no anastomotic complications occurred, while 6/21 (29%) animals in the non-colostomy group had complications. On day two there was no difference between the groups as regards anastomotic strength and collagen content. After a week, however, the control group showed a significant increase in both anastomotic strength and collagen content which was not observed in the colostomy group. The absence of increase in anastomotic strength in the colostomy group had no adverse effect on anastomotic healing, as judged by complications. Thus, a diverting colostomy may be of value in reducing anastomotic complications after resection of a left colon obstruction.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed1999

Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection: outcome after 63 cases.

PURPOSE: For patients with distal rectal or anal tumors, quality of life can be compromised after abdominoperineal resection and iliac colostomy. This study examines our experience with a continent perineal colostomy constructed from a colonic smooth-muscle cuff wrap. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1996, 63 patients with distal rectal or anal tumors (0-5 cm from the anal verge) underwent abdominoperineal resection and construction of a colonic smooth-muscle cuff at the site of the perineal colostomy. Postoperatively, all patients required colonic irrigations daily or every two days. The complications, continence at 6 and 12 months, and degree of satisfaction were prospectively evaluated using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: Early complications included partial perineal dehiscence in 14 (22.5 percent) patients, pelvic abscess in 2 (3 percent) patients, and colostomy necrosis in 1 (1.6 percent) patient. Late complications were colostomy stricture in 7 (11.8 percent) patients, perineal sinus tract in 4 (6.7 percent) patients, and mucosal prolapse in 12 (20 percent) patients. Satisfactory continence (complete continence to stool and incontinence to gas) at 6 and 12 months was achieved in 30 (55.6 percent) and 27 (59 percent) patients, respectively. Patient satisfaction was noted in 85 percent. CONCLUSION: Continent perineal colostomy can serve as an alternative to conventional iliac colostomy. Most patients were satisfied. The modest complication rate can be minimized with patient selection.

Abdomen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Loop transverse colostomy. The case against.

All large-bowel stomas (198) performed between 1970 and 1980 in a community hospital were reviewed. Twenty-nine stomas were loop transverse colostomies. There were five deaths, a complication rate related to the stoma of 28 per cent, and only 18 patients ever achieved colostomy closure. Our conclusions are as follows: (1) transverse colostomy is a holdover from the past; (2) "temporary" loop colostomy is a misnomer; (3) all colostomies should be end-bearing and matured primarily; (4) blind surgery invites tragedy; (5) loop transverse colostomy is a risky first stage with little benefit; (6) every colostomy should be placed as near as possible to the disease process; and (7) resection of the disease is the ideal first stage.

Colonic Diseases↗
PubMed1987

Laser Doppler velocimetry and the measurement of colostomy blood flow.

Early colostomy closure leads to a high rate of fecal fistula formation which may be due to a poor blood supply. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a new method of measuring colonic blood flow. Blood flow in 17 colostomies has been measured at one week, median flux 28 units (range, 13 to 43) and in 12 colostomies more than eight weeks after formation, median flux 46 units (range, 35-56; P less than 0.002). Nine of the "mature" colostomies have been closed without a fecal fistula or other signs of anastomotic failure. Serial readings of colostomy blood flow were made at weekly intervals in another ten stomas over a period of two months. Blood flow increased over this time from a median of 19 units (range, 17 to 22) at one week to a median of 44 units (range, 39 to 48; P less than 0.002) at eight weeks. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a simple, noninvasive method of measuring colostomy blood flow and the findings support a clinical policy for delayed colostomy closure.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study.

The need for protective transverse colostomy in low anterior resection using the EEA stapler was tested in a randomized series of 50 patients, half of whom received peroperative protective colostomy. Gastrografin enema on the tenth postoperative day showed a leakage frequency of 30 per cent in both groups. Clinical leakage was noted in 4 per cent (one patient) in the colostomy group and 12 per cent (three patients) in the noncolostomy group. Protective colostomy was followed by stenosis in nine instances, compared with only two in the noncolostomy group (2 alpha = 0.05). Routine protective colostomy should not be used in low anterior resection when the EEA stapling instrument is used. The occasional clinical leakage, which may appear in the postoperative period, can be revealed by close observation and successfully treated by an emergency colostomy. The majority of patients with anterior resection of the rectum, therefore, can be spared the inconvenience and cost of temporary colostomy.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Morbidity and timing of colostomy closure in trauma patients.

The reported morbidity of colostomy closure in trauma patients varies from 5 to 27 per cent. Low morbidity rates are cited as a factor favouring colostomy creation and against expanded indications for primary repair in the treatment of colonic injuries. In order to assess the morbidity of colostomy closure, we reviewed all colonic injuries from 1979 to 1991 at our institutions. In all, 86 trauma patients who underwent colostomy creation and closure were identified. There were 82 men and four women with an age range of 16 to 74 years (mean 28.1 years). Of these, 95 per cent (N = 82) resulted from penetrating trauma. Of the patients, 63 per cent (N = 54) received end colostomies and 81 per cent (N = 70) of the patients had associated injuries. Of the patients, 38 per cent (N = 33) had a complication with their initial operation. There were no deaths after colostomy closure, but a total morbidity of 24.4 per cent (N = 21) was noted. There were 11 anastomotic complications (two of which required repeat laparotomy) and nine wound infections. The average length of stay was 10.4 days. Morbidity was concentrated in the group who had complications at their initial hospitalization. This was especially true if these patients underwent closure earlier than 3 months after injury. Conversely, if the first operation was uncomplicated, waiting longer than 3 months to perform colostomy closure did not improve results further.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Revision and closure of the colostomy.

Reoperative stomal surgery includes the correction of complications and closure of a colostomy. Necrosis, retraction, and stenosis are the most frequently occurring complications and are simply corrected by straightforward techniques. Prolapse of the colostomy and parastomal hernia occur less frequently. Their repair is slightly more complex than that of the previous group of complications. Colostomy closure ranges from simple suture closure of the loop colostomy, through anastomosis of the divided colostomy, to the sometimes difficult gastrointestinal reconstruction after the Hartmann procedure. Death after closure of colostomy is infrequent, but anastomotic complications occur after all types of closure. Leak and sepsis are by far the most frequent anastomotic complications. Stenosis occurs less often. The same degree of care exercised during colectomy and anastomosis is necessary for optimal results after colostomy closure.

Colostomy↗
PubMed1999

The use of diverting colostomies in paediatric peri-anal burns.

Over a 3 yr period we performed colostomies in 13 paediatric perineal burn patients out of a total of 1544 patients admitted to our Burns Unit during that period. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) burn was 34% (14-65%); ten patients sustained fire burns and the remaining three hot water burns. We performed prophylactic colostomies in seven children, therapeutic colostomies (to counteract deep wound infection and septicaemia with gut-derived organisms) in five patients and one colostomy in a cerebral palsy child with a left hemiparesis. A sigmoid end-colostomy with Hartmann's closure of the distal segment was the preferred method of choice. In all children but one (died from multi-organ failure 13 days after admission) there was a marked improvement in the clinical appearance of the burn wounds and subsequent graft-take and healing. There was a change in the bacterial profile away from predominantly gut-derived Gram negative organisms to either Pseudomonas aeruginosa or no pathological organisms grown. Complications were few--two children suffered prolapse of their colostomy requiring manual reduction. We advocate diverting colostomies in a highly select group of paediatric burn patients in whom continual faecal soiling is threatening to both graft and life.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

A multidimensional modeling of predictors influencing the adjustment to a colostomy.

PURPOSE: Factors contributing to the postoperative adjustment of patients who had undergone permanent colostomy surgery were studied. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Sixty patients who underwent colostomy surgery at 5 hospitals in Santiago, Chile, between 1987 and 1995 were evaluated. Subjects were between the ages of 27 and 89 and underwent colostomy surgery from 4 months to 19 years before data collection. METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS: A demographic questionnaire and a semistructured interview were used to elicit information concerning psychosocial reactions to a colostomy and perceptions about the changes in lifestyle created by the ostomy. Medical records were reviewed for information about disease-related characteristics and an ostomy self-care scale measured coping skills. Adjustment to the colostomy procedure was measured by means of the Olbrisch ostomy adjustment scale. RESULTS: Patient adaptation to a colostomy is primarily affected by the following factors: (1) the level of ostomy self-care, (2) psychological support, and (3) social support from family and significant others. CONCLUSION: Successful adjustment to a permanent colostomy is most likely to occur if the patient receives adequate instruction in self-care and has the appropriate psychological support to integrate the new physical changes into a healthy body image. This includes continued acceptance from family and the patient's social network.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2005

Same admission colostomy closure: a prospective, randomised study in selected patient groups.

BACKGROUND: Despite a recent trend towards primary repair, colostomy still has an important place in the management of different colorectal pathologies. Timing of colostomy closure is a debatable issue among general surgeons. We carried out a prospective, randomised study to compare the outcome after same admission colostomy closure (SACC) and conventional delayed colostomy closure (CDCC) in patients with predominantly traumatic injury of the large bowel. METHODS: Sixty patients, the majority with traumatic colorectal pathologies, were prospectively randomised to SACC [30 patients, 23 men, mean age 27.9 +/- 9.7 (range, 18-65) years] or (CDCC) [30 patients, 24 men, mean age 28.6 +/- 10.6 (range, 18-63) years]. All colostomies were closed using an intraperitoneal closure technique. Pre-operative data and post-operative outcomes were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of seven patients (23.3%) with SACC developed complications compared with eight patients (26.6%) having CDCC (p = 0.83). The mean hospital stay (p < 0.01), as well as the overall cost (p < 0.001), were significantly less in the SACC group. CONCLUSIONS: Same admission colostomy closure is a safe and cost-effective technique for colostomy closure in selected groups of patients.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1987

Colostomy closure after colon injury: a low-morbidity procedure.

One justification for expanding the indications for primary repair of colonic injuries is the high morbidity classically associated with colostomy closure. Our impression that this morbidity is overstated prompted us to review our experience with closure of colostomies constructed for treatment of colon trauma for the 5-year period 1979-1984. During this period 75 colostomies created for treatment of colorectal injuries were closed. Complications were frequent after colostomy creation, but few could be attributed to the colostomy. Following colostomy closure, however, complications were infrequent (5%) and generally minor. If morbidity of colostomy closure is cited as a factor justifying expanded indications for primary repair of colon injuries, current morbidity rates should be borne in mind.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The morbidity and financial impact of colostomy closure in trauma patients.

During a 10-year period, 87 patients who had undergone elective colostomy closure at Bellevue Hospital were retrospectively reviewed in order to evaluate the morbidity of colostomy closure after traumatic injury and its financial impact. Sixty-two per cent of the colostomies were in the left colon and 38% were right sided. The interval from the original injury to colostomy takedown varied from 20 to 465 days, with a mean of 144 days. The mean postoperative hospital stay for the entire group was 15.13 days at a cost of $13,995. There were no deaths and no anastomotic leaks in the entire series, but a morbidity rate of 25% ensued. Small bowel obstruction was the most frequent significant complication, occurring in ten patients (11.5%) and resulting in a prolongation of hospital stay by 7 days at an additional cost of $6,500 per patient. One additional patient developed a subphrenic abscess which required operative drainage, necessitating an additional 24 days in the hospital at an increased cost of $22,200. Other complications which did not prolong hospital stay included eight superficial wound infections, one transient respiratory failure, and two patients who returned at a later date with incisional hernias at the stoma site. The 25% morbidity encountered in this series suggests that colostomy closure is not a low-morbidity procedure and should be considered as an important factor favoring primary repair. Coupled with the significant financial impact of both colostomy formation and takedown, ample justification exists for greater efforts in avoiding colostomy formation whenever feasible.

Adolescent↗