Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cardiac Catheterization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

The diagnostic accuracy of combined clinical and noninvasive cardiac evaluation: comparison with findings at cardiac catheterization.

The accuracy of combined clinical and noninvasive cardiac diagnostic evaluation was prospectively examined in 108 consecutive patients referred to the heart station for echocardiographic examination prior to cardiac catheterization. History, physical examination, scalar electrocardiology, chest roentgenography, phonocardiography and pulse recording, and M-mode echocardiography were employed by the heart station cardiologist, who assigned one or more diagnoses to each patient. In addition, one of three management strategies was proposed for each patient: 1) surgery without cardiac catheterization; 2) medical therapy without cardiac catheterization; or 3) cardiac catheterization for clarification of the diagnosis. The results of the combined clinical and noninvasive evaluation were independently reviewed for each patient and compared with the diagnosis determined by cardiac catheterization, results of cardiac surgery, and total hospital course. Diagnostic predictions employing combined clinical and noninvasive cardiac evaluation were completely correct in 86% of patients, and management strategy was correct in 97% of individuals. In approximately one-half of all patients full cardiac catheterization or coronary arteriography was recommended. All management strategy errors and two-thirds of diagnostic errors occurred in patients with mitral regurgitation, aortic regurgitation, or coronary artery disease. Combined clinical and noninvasive evaluation results in accurate diagnostic information adequate for the formulation of appropriate management strategies in the majority of patients, but many individuals with cardiac disease still require invasive evaluation for complete diagnosis.

Adolescent↗

Cardiac catheterization laboratory survey: 1990. Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, Laboratory Performance Standards Committee.

A survey of 117 member cardiac catheterization laboratories was undertaken by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. The survey included numbers and types of procedures, both diagnostic and interventional, in adult as well as pediatric age groups. Radiation safety, various laboratory policies, frequency of short stay, and outpatient procedures were tabulated. Report generation, training programs, administrative organization, and laboratory equipment were all included. The results were compared with a 1978 survey. Areas of concern in terms of safety of the patient and possible underutilization of laboratories were identified.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Heparin is ubiquitously used in cardiac catheterization but predisposes to the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The objective was to examine prospectively the prevalence of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the population undergoing cardiac catheterization. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 500 consecutive patients presenting for cardiac catheterization at our institution who were enrolled over the course of 1 year. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and concurrent platelet counts were measured at catheterization and 5 days thereafter. Thrombotic complications were assessed 30 days after the procedure via telephone interview. All patients presenting for cardiac catheterization at our institution were screened. Inclusion criteria were (a) males and nonpregnant females with age >18 years and (b) patients scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterization. Patients with a known history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, with documented bleeding or hypercoagulability, and those at high risk for bleeding were excluded. RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 15 (3%) had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies before catheterization. After catheterization, the prevalence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies increased to 10.1% (36 of 357) of the patients. Overall rates of thrombotic complications were low (4 of 445, 0.9%) and did not correlate with anti-PF4/heparin antibody status. Patients with an initial positive test for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were more likely to have prior coronary disease (73.3% vs 45.2%; P < .05). Patients who developed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies after catheterization were more likely to have increased length of stay (3.7 vs 2.4 days; P = .02). The platelet count at the time of catheterization was lower in the cohort of patients who developed the second positive anti-PF4/heparin antibody test versus patients without a second positive antibody test (mean values of 191,800/microL vs 222,300/microL; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of antibodies to PF4/heparin is low in the population presenting for cardiac catheterization. However, a significant proportion of patients develop antibodies to PF4/heparin after a small exposure to heparin during catheterization. Clinically significant thrombotic complications were rare and did not correlate with antibody status.

Aged↗

Cardiac catheterization in children.

Although cardiac catheterization in children is not without significant risk, it is mandatory before corrective cardiac surgery is undertaken. Not only can the procedure delineate the cardiac anatomy but it also yields information about the direction and amount of shunts, pulmonary vascular resistance and myocardial function. It is used to follow the severity of lesions such as aortic or pulmonic stenosis. Complications include cardiac perforation, renal impairment, neurologic problems and many others.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

Combined cardiac catheterization for uncomplicated ischemic heart disease in a Medicare population.

PURPOSE: Experts recommend left heart catheterization alone to evaluate uncomplicated ischemic heart disease, reserving right heart catheterization for specific indications. Yet some centers routinely perform combined cardiac catheterization (left heart catheterization and right heart catheterization together). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using 1992-1993 Pennsylvania Medicare claims for cardiac catheterizations (n = 41,180), we examined rates of combined cardiac catheterization for patients with uncomplicated ischemic heart disease for each hospital (n = 73) that performed catheterizations. We compared combined cardiac catheterization rates among hospitals and developed a multivariable model to identify hospital characteristics associated with high combined cardiac catheterization rates. A random sample of cases from the 10 hospitals with the highest combined cardiac catheterization rates were reviewed to determine justification, complications, and results of combined cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: Of the 41,180 cardiac catheterizations, 14,177 (34%) were combined procedures. Among hospitals, combined cardiac catheterization rates varied from 2% to 98%. Hospital characteristics associated with high combined cardiac catheterization rates included having a cardiology fellowship program (relative risk [RR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.7), location in eastern Pennsylvania (RR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.8-3.5), and volume of catheterizations performed (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99/100 procedures). For reviewed cases, the most common justification for combined cardiac catheterization was planned revascularization (44%), which is not a specific indication. Only 49% of cases had at least one specific indication for right heart catheterization (range by hospital, 30%-74%). The abnormal findings on the right heart catheterization rarely appeared to change management. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the practice of combined cardiac catheterization, which appears to be related to teaching status and geographic location. The most common justification for the procedure was planned revascularization, which is not one of the specific indications supported by current literature.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac catheterization is a common procedure that involves the introduction of a small sheath (5F-8F) into the femoral artery for insertion of other diagnostic catheters. After cardiac catheterization, local compression of the femoral artery is required to prevent bleeding and to achieve hemostasis. Traditional methods of achieving hemostasis require significant time and close supervision by medical personnel and can contribute to patients' discomfort. VasoSeal is a recently developed device that delivers absorbable collagen into the supra-arterial space to promote hemostasis. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between patients receiving a collagen plug and patients in whom a traditional method of achieving hemostasis was used after diagnostic cardiac catheterization. METHODS: An outcomes tracking tool was used to analyze the medical records of 95 patients in whom a traditional method was used (traditional group) and 81 patients in whom VasoSeal was used (device group) to achieve hemostasis. Complications at the femoral access site, patients' satisfaction, and times to hemostasis, ambulation, and discharge were compared. RESULTS: Hematomas of 6-cm diameter occurred in 5.3% of the traditional group; no complications occurred in the device group. The device group also achieved hemostasis faster and had earlier ambulation (P < .001). Patients in the device group were discharged a mean of 5 hours sooner than patients in the traditional group (P < .05). No significant differences were found in patients' satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: VasoSeal is a safe and effective method of achieving hemostasis after cardiac catheterization that can hasten time to hemostasis, ambulation, and discharge.

Adult↗

[The percutaneous cardiac catheterization in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac failure (author's transl)].

The results of a modified percutaneous approach of 113 cardiac catheterizations will be reported. The success rate for the right heart catheterization from the unselected cases in 63% in infants, 84% in those one to five years old and 96% in those children older than five years. For the retrograde left heart catheterization, the percutaneous approach was successful in infants in 91% (except one patient with aortic coarctation) and successful in all patients older than one year.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

Developing guidelines for allocating catheterization laboratory resources: lessons from an Ontario Consensus Panel. Consensus Panel on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Services in Ontario and the Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.

In March 1997, the Ontario Ministry of Health asked the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario (CCN) to develop guidelines for allocating cardiac catheterization laboratory resources. A consensus panel of providers and planners used findings from the literature and expert opinion to recommend guidelines for the operation of cardiac catheterization laboratories and criteria to be considered when allocating additional cardiac catheterization laboratory resources. This article summarizes the consensus panel's major findings that may be of value to other jurisdictions, including need identification, clinical practice, system issues, location criteria and cost considerations. The article reflects the advice given to the Ontario Ministry of Health by the CCN and is not an official position paper of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Infection prevention guidelines for cardiac catheterization laboratories. Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Laboratory Performance Standards Committee.

The following guidelines for prevention of catheterization laboratory infections are based on standard precautions for infection prevention in surgical wounds. Specific recommendations for patient preparation include proper methods for hair removal, skin cleaning and draping, antibiotic prophylaxis, wound irrigation and dressing, and sheath removal. Sterile precautions should be more vigorous for cutdown procedures compared to percutaneous. Caps, masks, gowns, and gloves help to protect both the patient and operator. Handwashing is the most important procedure for preventing infections. Maintenance of the catheterization laboratory environment includes appropriate cleaning, limitation of traffic, and maintenance of adequate ventilation. Proper catheterization technique and appropriate use of sterile equipment will decrease the wound infection rate. Protection of personnel may be accomplished by proper gowning and gloving, disposal of contaminated equipment, and care of puncture wounds and lacerations. All personnel should receive vaccination for hepatitis B.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

Diagnostic cardiac catheterization. When is it appropriate?

Cardiac catheterization is a low-risk procedure that provides information on cardiac and coronary artery anatomy, hemodynamic parameters, and valvular function. Not all patients with cardiac symptoms need the procedure. Most patients should have noninvasive screening procedures before referral for diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Obviously, not all patients clearly meet strict criteria, and making decisions in "borderline" cases demands clinical judgment. The recommendations given here are a combination of ACC/AHA guidelines and standards defined in current literature.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

Mobile cardiac catheterization registry: report of the first 1,001 patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of mobile cardiac catheterization. Mobile cardiac catheterization was introduced into clinical practice in 1989, but there has been no systematic study of its performance and safety. A registry was established in 1989 to monitor outcomes with mobile cardiac catheterization and is reported here. Patients were screened for eligibility for mobile cardiac catheterization using the joint AHA/ACC criteria for outpatient angiography. Eligible patients underwent mobile catheterization at eight hospitals within 120 miles of the base tertiary center. Helicopter evacuation services were available at each mobile site. The indications, findings, dispositions, and complications of mobile cardiac catheterization were recorded by means of a checklist, telephone follow-up and chart review. A total of 1,001 consecutive patients were entered into the registry in the first 20 months of operation, including 436 females and 565 males aged 22 to 84 years. Angina (Canadian Classes II-IV) was the most frequent primary indication for catheterization (46.4%), followed by atypical chest pain (36.9%), or a positive exercise stress test (25.6%). Infrequent indications for catheterization included a history of myocardial infarction (5.6%), congestive heart failure (7.1%), arrhythmias (4.1%), and valvular heart disease (0.7%). Catheterization was accomplished in 99.9% of patients. Angiographically normal studies were observed in 22.8%, and mild (< or = 50%) coronary artery disease in 13.6% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Propofol does not modify the hemodynamic status of children with intracardiac shunts undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Immobility and cardiovascular stability are required for cardiac catheterization. Pediatric patients need a type of sedation that also allows spontaneous ventilation without supplemental oxygen. Propofol has been adequate in hemodynamically stable patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. However, mild systemic hypotension caused by propofol may increase a preexisting right-to-left shunt. The aim of this study is to evaluate, in pediatric patients scheduled for cardiac catheterization, the effects of propofol on systemic and pulmonic circulations. Fifteen patients aged 18 months to 9 years were studied. After a fast of 4-6 hours for solid food, the patient arrived at the cardiac catheterization suite, where an IV catheter was placed. Usual monitoring was used. For sedation, without supplemental oxygen, patients received 1 mg/kg of fentanyl followed by propofol (1-2 mg/kg) titrated to immobility during preparation of the groin. A continuous infusion of propofol (100 mg/kg/min) was also started to obtain immobility during the procedure. Hemodynamic data, including systemic venous, pulmonary artery and vein, aortic saturations, and pressures, were recorded; Qp and Qs were calculated. The same set of data was re-corded 4 minutes after discontinuation of propofol and when the patient was responding to tactile stimuli. Despite lower pressures during propofol infusion, as compared with those pressures measured after discontinuation of propofol, the extent of the intracardiac shunt remained unchanged. Propofol seems to be an adequate sedative agent for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, including those with intracardiac shunts.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗

Two cases of occipital infarction following cardiac catheterization.

Transient visual disturbance following cardiac catheterization has been regarded as a benign and transient complication. We describe two cases of computed-tomography-documented occipital infarction after cardiac catheterization that emphasize a complication more serious than previously thought.

Aged↗

Transradial bilateral cardiac catheterization and endomyocardial bioposy: a feasibility study.

A case series and technique of transradial cardiac catheterization with cardiac biospy are described. Transradial cardiac catheterization is perceived to be limited to arterial procedures. Using the veins of the forearm, we have converted many previous femoral arterial/venous cardiac procedures to a transradial/forearm approach. Retrospective review of patients undergoing transradial procedures with concurrent cardiac biopsies was undertaken. A convenience sample of transfemoral procedures with biopsies performed by the same operator was identified for comparison. Coronary angiography/left heart catheterization was performed using standard transradial/femoral approaches. A 7 Fr introducer sheath was placed via a large median forearm or femoral vein. Right heart catheterization was done using a 120 cm balloon-tipped catheter and endomyocardial biopsy was performed with a 7 Fr biotome. Both groups were then compared for baseline characteristics and procedural events. Transradial (n = 8) and transfemoral (n = 12) procedures were all done for postcardiac transplantation management. There was no crossover between groups. Durations of the radial procedures (median, 73 min; range, 40-95) were similar to transfemoral procedures (median, 68 min; range, 45-105). No procedural complications were reported. Endomyocardial biopsy plays an important role in the diagnosis of transplant rejection and identification of pathological processes that cause myocardial dysfunction. Transradial cardiac catheterization has some clear advantages over a transfemoral approach. Bilateral cardiac catheterization with concurrent cardiac biopsy is technically feasible using a transradial/forearm approach. This approach offers an alternative approach for selected patients in need of cardiac biopsy.

Adult↗

Ultrasound-guided compression repair of femoral pseudoaneurysms complicating cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Femoral pseudoaneurysms complicate cardiac catheterizations in up to 3.2% of cases. Ultrasound-guided compression repair (UGCR) is a known valid alternative therapy to surgical and percutaneous repair. We evaluated its safety and efficacy in a series of patients. METHODS: Patients with clinical findings suggesting pseudoaneurysm after cardiac catheterization, underwent echo-color and duplex studies. When a pseudoaneurysm was diagnosed, the patient underwent UGCR until closure or for 50 min. A groin compression bandage was applied after the procedure and patients were put on bed rest for 12-18 hours; a new ultrasound study was performed the day after the procedure: when the UGCR procedure failed, patients were referred to a vascular surgeon or interventional radiologist. When possible, a third ultrasound study was performed 1 month after the procedure. RESULTS: Between January 2001 and June 2003, 15 pseudoaneurysms were diagnosed and treated by means of UGCR. The UGCR procedure (UGCR followed by groin bandage) was successful in 13 cases (87%); 1 patient underwent surgical repair and 1 patient underwent percutaneous repair. No local or systemic complications were observed following UGCR. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoaneurysm UGCR constitutes a safe and valid procedure; it is less invasive and easier to perform than percutaneous and surgical repair.

Adult↗

Interpreting cardiac catheterization data. Part 2.

Data obtained by cardiac catheterization, properly interpreted, are an extremely useful supplement to information obtained from the medical history, physical examination, electrocardiography, chest x-ray examination, and other noninvasive diagnostic techniques. Elevations of pressure in the cardiac chambers and great vessels and corresponding patterns of pressure curves are discerned in the presence of various pathologic conditions affecting the heart. Blood samples are taken during cardiac catheterization for measurement of cardiac output and to detect intracardiac shunting. Attempts have been made to estimate the magnitude of shunts from abnormal dye-dilution curves. Exercise stress is often used during cardiac catheterization to evaluate overall cardiovascular performance. Angiocardiography gives a permanent graphic record of structural abnormalities. Myocardial lactate metabolism provides a means of evaluating the adequacy of coronary blood flow.

Angiocardiography↗