Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Tenderness at motor points. A diagnostic and prognostic aid for low-back injury.

In patients with low-back injury the motor points of some muscles may be tender. Of fifty patients with low-back "strain", twenty-six had tender motor points and twenty-four did not, while forty-nine of fifty patients with radicular signs and symptoms suggesting disc involvement had tender motor points, and the one without such tender points had a hamstring contusion which limited straight leg raising. Of fifty controls with no back disability, only seven had mild tender points after strenuous activity, while forty-six of another fifty controls with occasional back discomfort had mild motor-point tenderness. In all instances the tender motor points were located in the myotomes corresponding to the probable segmental levels of spinal injury and of root involvement, when present. Patients with low-back strain and no tender motor points were disabled for an average of 6.9 weeks, while those with the same diagnosis but tender motor points were disabled for an average of 19.7 weeks, or almost as long as the patients with signs of radicular involvement, who were disabled for an average of 25.7 weeks. Tender motor points may therefore be of diagnostic and prognostic value, serving as sensitive localizers of radicular involvement and differentiating a simple mechanical low-back strain from one with neural involvement.

Adult↗

Second in a series. Personal factors contributing to back injury in home care.

A healthy back is necessary for every activity a person undertakes--whether at work, home, or anywhere else. Preventing back problems is more effective than treating them after they happen. If a person gets a back injury, it may not be caused just by a single activity, but by many activities and lifestyle choices that have added up over time.

Accidents, Occupational↗

Epidemiology of acute low back injury in employees of a large home improvement retail company.

Acute low back injuries are described in a cohort of about 31,000 material handlers employed in all Home Depot, Inc., retail stores in California from 1990 through 1994. With over 87 million work hours, incidence density rates, rate ratios, and confidence intervals are given by age, sex, length of employment, and job-lifting requirements. Injuries are further described by lost work days, activity at time of injury, work restrictions, and time frames. The unadjusted low back injury rate per million work hours was 1.6 times higher for men compared with women, and rates were highest for those less than 25 years of age, those with less than 2 years of current job experience, and employees with the greatest materials lifting and handling job requirements. These findings in unadjusted rates and rate ratios persisted when each was adjusted through a Poisson regression model, with the exception of sex. The adjusted risk ratio for males was reversed with significantly higher risk in females when the rate ratio was adjusted for age, lifting intensity, and length of job experience. Injuries were most commonly associated with lifting activities and, while injury occurrence was highest from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., rates were greatest during those hours when the store was closed to retail activities. Merchandise stocking that requires heavy and frequent materials handling is done during these hours. Fewer injuries than expected were reported on weekends, days with considerably less materials handling activities.

Absenteeism↗

Reducing work-related back injuries.

A centralized educational program: 1) increases awareness of prevention of back injury, 2) decreases the cost of workers' compensation claims resulting from work-related back injury/pain, 3) decreases the amount of employee sick time taken because of back pain, 4) increases work productivity through proper ergonomics, and 5) teaches staff members to take care of their backs at home and at work. A descriptive study, and tracking of reported back-injury cases and the cost per claim, evaluates the program's efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Predicting risk of back injuries, work absenteeism, and chronic disability. The shortcomings of preplacement screening.

Preplacement screening is put forth by some as an effective method for preventing low back disability at the workplace. Although there are still large gaps in knowledge regarding the natural history of and risk factors for back disability, it is clear that the majority of costs are derived from the small proportion of those that will suffer with back symptoms for 6 months or more. Thus, if preplacement screening is to have an impact on health care spending and compensation costs, the screening test will have to be predictive not so much of all back injuries, but rather of work absenteeism and especially chronic disability. This paper presents some criteria for evaluating a screening program and explores the effect of choosing different outcomes for evaluation. The literature on the effectiveness of a number of preplacement screening techniques is examined. Current legislation related to preplacement screening is also described. The natural history, etiologic factors, and prognostic markers for back injuries need to be elucidated further before effective screening strategies can be developed to reduce the incidence of back injuries and back disability in the population.

Absenteeism↗

Incidence of acute low-back injury among older workers in a cohort of material handlers.

Injuries to the low back are the most common cause for injury claims among material handlers. Previous studies have shown conflicting results about how age affects risk of low-back injury. This study describes the incidence of acute low-back injury by age, gender, length of employment, and lifting intensity measured by job classification in a cohort of material handlers. The cohort included all material handlers employed at a large home improvement retail chain in California from 1989 through 1994. The cohort accrued approximately 50,000 full time equivalents over the study period. A total of 2152 low-back injuries were reported during the study period. Compared to workers aged younger than 45, the crude rate ratio for workers aged 45 to 54 was 0.78, and for workers aged 55 and above was 0.84. However, this age difference was not apparent among length of employment strata or among jobs with low or medium lifting intensity. A higher proportion of workers over the age of 55 missed work time because of their injury, and workers over 45 had a higher average number of lost workdays per injury. This research indicates that workers over age 55 had similar injury rates to workers younger than age 55, even when considering lifting intensity and length of employment. However, their injuries may cause a longer period of disability.

Acute Disease↗

Disabling back injuries among nursing personnel: research needs and justification.

The need for more research on the problem of work-related back injuries among nursing personnel is documented by two comparisons based on the ratio of back injury workers' compensation claims to eligible employees. The first analysis of occupations across industries indicated that nursing aides, licensed practical nurses, and registered nurses all had high back injury ratios compared to other occupations. The second analysis of occupations within four parts of the health care industry indicated that aides in nursing and personal care facilities had the greatest problem with disabling back disorders. The article concludes with a list of research needs and suggested research methodologies.

Back Injuries↗

Magnetic resonance imaging for low back injuries: appropriate use in managing workers' compensation claims.

Workers' compensation claims resulting from low back injuries are a major concern for U.S. employees and employers. Employees seek resolution of their injuries and related symptoms and rapid return to gainful employment. Employers are eager to help them, as they must absorb the health care and disability costs incurred. Health care providers involved with workers' compensation claims are charged with providing appropriate services to meet the needs of both employees and employers. Magnetic resonance imaging has become the gold standard for diagnosing low back injuries. This study provided data necessary for health care providers to design protocols using magnetic resonance imaging in managing workers' compensation claims for low back injuries.

Clinical Protocols↗

Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis.

Little is known about predictors of duration of work disability (DOD). This cohort study of 433 workers' compensation claimants estimated DOD for job, injury, and demographic factors during consecutive disability phases using Cox regression analysis. DOD was calculated from administrative records. Results show that DOD increases with the time spent bending and lifting or pushing or pulling heavy objects at work, but it is unrelated to sitting, standing, or vibration. Younger age, longer pre-injury employment, less severe injuries, and a previous back injury predicted shorter disability, the latter factor only during the subacute/chronic disability phases. The effect of injury severity decayed over time. This study demonstrates the usefulness of a phase-specific analysis and shows that physical job and injury factors have a significant and time-varying impact on DOD.

Adult↗

Back injuries in the young athlete.

Back pain in children and young athletes is very different from back pain in adults. Macrotrauma must be carefully evaluated and managed, even in the absence of definitive radiographic findings. Microtrauma must be suspected in at-risk athletes. These athletes require persistent diagnostic evaluation and may require SPECT bone scan to uncover a posterior element stress reaction. Atraumatic back pain requires the elimination of neoplastic, infectious, rheumatologic, or congenital causes.

Adolescent↗

The accident process preceding overexertion back injuries in nursing personnel. PROSA study group.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective dynamic-population-based study investigated factors involved in the accident process preceding overexertion back injuries among nursing personnel. METHODS: The study covered all reported occupational overexertion back injuries due to accidents among of the approximately 24 500 nurses in the Stockholm County hospitals during 1 year. It was assumed that several factors interact in the accident process. Detailed information was obtained for each injury by interviews with the injured nurse and head nurse. Risks in the physical environment were identified using an ergonomic checklist. RESULTS: During the study 136 overexertion back injuries were reported. Of the 130 nurses participating in the study, 125 had been injured in connection with patient work. Cluster analysis yielded 6 clusters and their pattern of contributing factors. The most frequent injury occurred during patient transfer in the bed or to or from the bed, without the use of transfer devices, when the patient suddenly lost his or her balance or resisted during the transfer and the nurse had to make a sudden movement. However, there were physical conditions, such as shortcomings in the physical work environment or a lack of a transfer device, that compelled the nurses to perform the tasks under unsafe conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The clusters showed a complexity of different kinds of accidents and indicated that the measures for preventing accidents, or for blocking an accident process once started, have to be of different kinds and placed at several different levels in the organization of a workplace.

Accidents, Occupational↗

Back injury.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Back Injuries↗

Strength and fitness and subsequent back injuries in firefighters.

This prospective investigation was done to evaluate five strength and fitness measurements and the subsequent occurrence of back injuries in 1652 firefighters for the years 1971 to 1974. The prospective measurements included flexibility, isometric lifting strength, bicycle ergometer exercise measurements of two-minute recovery heart rate, diastolic blood pressure at a heart rate of 160 beats per minute and watts of effort required to sustain heart rate at 160. Three fitness and conditioning groups were established by multivariate ranking and regression techniques (259 high, 266 low, and 1127 middle) and the subsequent back injuries were tabulated for the three groups. The results showed a graded and statistically significant protective effect for added levels of fitness and conditioning (least fit, 7.1% injured; middle fit, 3.2% jured; and most fit, 0.8% injured). It was concluded that physical fitness and conditioning of firefighters are preventive of back injuries and that further investigations are warranted to study other injuries and physical fitness in this physically active occupational group.

Adult↗

They don't look like weightlifters...nurses and back injury.

This study, done in the Regional Hospital Board area, of incidence rates of back injury, based on ACC claims, shows significantly higher rates of back injury in nurses as compared with clerical workers, and also differing rates between staff nurses (lowest), enrolled nurses and nurse aides (highest). There were no significant differences found between nurses working in a general hospital setting, a geriatric hospital or in the community. Nurses' working conditions are discussed to try to explain these differences.

Back Injuries↗

Occupational lower-back injuries in a primary medical care setting: a five-year follow-up study.

A cohort study with follow-up that describes the clinical characteristics and outcome five years later of patients with new occupational lower-back injuries, who were seen at a primary-care occupational health clinic in 1979, is presented. Follow-up data were obtained for 119 cases, 63% of all eligible cases. Occupational lower-back injuries constituted 9.5% of new occupational injuries that were seen at the clinic. Men aged less than 50 years accounted for 82% of all cases, and lifting was the most common method of injury. Forty-three per cent of patients were able to return to alternative duties without any absence from work and the majority (82%) of patients had returned to work in fewer than five days. Between 1979 and 1984, 48% of those studied had experienced recurrences of occupational lower-back injury that required medical treatment; half these recurrences occurred on more than three occasions. At five-year follow-up, 93% of patients were in work, although 70% of respondents stated they were still suffering back pain. Fewer than one-third of patients were receiving medical or other treatment at the time of follow-up. Only 2% of patients had undergone surgery and only 8% of patients were engaged in legal action in pursuit of a workers' compensation claim. This primary medical-care study challenges a number of popular stereotypes concerning occupational back injuries.

Absenteeism↗

Risk for occupational low-back injury after lumbar laminectomy for degenerative disc disease.

Thirty-two Postal Service applicants who had undergone laminectomies were classified as low risk for back injury after preplacement examinations and were subsequently hired for employment. Each was compared with six control subjects, who were matched by age, gender, date of hire, and job classification. The odds ratios for occupational back injury with 95% confidence intervals were 5.9 (1.9-18.8) overall and 9.1 (1.5-73.8) for letter carriers. Of subjects, 25% were injured, compared with 6% of controls. The median elapsed time between surgery and hire was 5.9 years for injured subjects and 6.8 years for uninjured subjects. A rank sum test comparing the elapsed times of the two groups was not significant (P = 0.30). Postal workers are at increased risk for back injury after laminectomy. The risk does not appear to decrease with increased time since surgery.

Adult↗

Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury.

STUDY DESIGN: An inception cohort design was used to study a consecutive sample of back-injured workers. OBJECTIVE: To refine and to test the Vermont Disability Prediction Questionnaire's ability to indicate an individual's relative risk for chronic disability after occupational low back injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although most back-injured workers return to work quickly, the minority who do not account for the majority of associated costs and health care. Early identification of workers at high risk for disability would facilitate intervention strategies. METHODS: During the study recruitment period, people aged 18-60 years reporting occupational low back injury to the Vermont Department of Labor and Industry within 11 days of onset were eligible. A Vermont Disability Prediction Questionnaire was mailed to the 442 subjects who could be contacted and who gave informed consent. One hundred sixty-three of the 166 subjects who completed and returned the questionnaire within 15 days of initial injury were telephoned 3 months later to determine work status. Those who returned the questionnaire were compared with those who would not consent or did not return the questionnaire in time according to age, sex, residence, wages, work hours per week, and length of employment. Employment status (inability to work because of low back pain) was evaluated by telephone interview 3 months after initial injury. RESULTS: The follow-up interviewer was blinded to the Vermont Disability Prediction Questionnaire scores. of the 163 subjects, 16 (10%) were not working because of low back pain. Using a simple dichotomous scoring system for 11 questionnaire items, a cut-off score of 0.48 identified 3-month postinjury work status, with 0.94 sensitivity and 0.84 specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Vermont Disability Prediction Questionnaire is a brief, easily administered and scored tool for identifying back-injured workers at relative risk for chronic disability. Such early identification should increase the efficiency of disability prevention strategies by directing them toward people who need them most. The accuracy of the questionnaire needs to be tested in a variety of different clinical and socioeconomic settings.

Adult↗