Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Amisulpride”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Cyclosporine A (CsA) affects the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the atypical antipsychotic amisulpride probably via inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp).

The importance of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the pharmacokinetics of amisulpride and the effects of a P-gp inhibitor cyclosporine A (CsA) was investigated both, in vitro and in vivo. In vitro and in vivo results indicated amisulpride as a substrate of P-gp. Amisulpride was not metabolized by rat liver microsomes. Open field behavior showed time dependent abolishment in locomotion by amisulpride (50 mg kg(-1)). Co-administration of CsA (50 mg kg(-1)) resulted in a higher and significantly longer antipsychotic effect (24 h after drug administration). Accordingly, the area under concentration-time curve in serum and brain was higher in CsA co-treated rats (13.5 vs. 29.8 micromol h l(-1) for serum and 2.16 vs 2.98 micromol h l(-1) for brain tissue) while renal clearance was not affected. These results pointed to a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between CsA and amisulpride most likely caused by inhibition of P-gp.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Acute antagonism of dopamine D2-like receptors by amisulpride: effects on hormone secretion in healthy volunteers.

Amisulpride is a selective D2-like dopamine receptor antagonist with a high affinity for the cloned D2 and D3 receptors. At low doses it may improve depressive and negative schizophrenic symptoms whereas antipsychotic effects on positive schizophrenic symptomatology require higher dosages. Acute endocrine effects were studied for two doses of amisulpride with regard to the daytime secretion of prolactin, thyroidea stimulating hormone (TSH), growth hormone (GH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and cortisol. Amisulpride was administered i.v. to eight healthy male volunteers in a single-blind trial under a randomized cross-over, placebo-controlled design using doses of 20 mg or 100 mg, or saline. The drug was injected at 09:00 h, and plasma samples were withdrawn from 08:30 h to 16:00 h at intervals of 15 and 30 min, respectively. At both dosages, prolactin was significantly elevated to the eight- to ten-fold of baseline levels. Likewise, a significant 50% elevation of TSH concentrations with a trend to a greater increase under the 100 mg dose was observed. Plasma levels of LH and cortisol were not significantly affected by amisulpride. With regard to GH secretion, there was a trend to a decrease only with the 20 mg dose. These results indicate that the neuroendocrinological side-effect profile of acute amisulpride administration may be similar to conventional neuroleptics, and that there are only minor dose-dependent differential effects on hormone secretion in the dose range investigated.

Adult↗

A double-blind randomised comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine for 2 months in the treatment of subjects with schizophrenia and comorbid depression.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and olanzapine in subjects with schizophrenia and comorbid depression in a randomised double-blind trial. PATIENTS: Eighty-five adult patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and presenting a depressive episode were randomised to amisulpride (200-600 mg/day) or olanzapine (5-15 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy variables were change in Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) score and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Change. Safety was monitored by adverse event reporting and determination of extrapyramidal function and metabolic variables. RESULTS: The mean change from baseline of CDS score was -6.84 in the amisulpride group and -7.36 in the olanzapine group. 65.9% and 61.5% of subjects, respectively, were considered "much" or "very much" improved. No significant inter-group difference in effect size was observed. The frequency of adverse events was low and emergence of extrapyramidal symptoms was not seen. Four patients in the olanzapine group developed abnormal triglyceride levels. Mean weight gain was 1.45 and 0.5 kg, respectively, in the olanzapine and amisulpride groups. CONCLUSION: Amisulpride and olanzapine are effective in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid depression. Tolerance of both drugs was acceptable, although use of olanzapine was associated with a trend toward greater metabolic side-effects .

Adult↗

Selective and sensitive determination of amisulpride in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with positive electrospray ionisation and multiple reaction monitoring.

The development of a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with positive electrospray ionisation (ESI(+)) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for the selective and sensitive bioanalytical determination of amisulpride, a substituted benzamide derivative, in human plasma is described. Plasma was cleaned up using a liquid-liquid extraction (diisopropylether:dichloromethane=1:1 (v/v)) procedure. The chemically related drug sulpiride was used as internal standard (ISTD) and a primary calibration function was established in the concentration range of 0.50-500.52 ng/ml for amisulpride in plasma by triple analysis of the corresponding calibration standards. A linear relationship between concentration and signal intensity (given as peak area ratio analyte/ISTD) was obtained (linear regression: r=0.9999). A lower limit of quantification (LLQ) of 0.50 ng/ml was used during measurement of study plasma samples. Satisfying results of within-day precision (CV=0.79 to 1.98%) and accuracy (mean relative deviation: -1.68 to 3.58%) and between-day precision (CV=1.34 to 4.62%) and accuracy (mean relative deviation: -1.73 to -3.77%) as well as of recovery (amisulpride: 81.74 to 84.83%; sulpiride: 58.65%) and selectivity investigations confirmed the high reliability of this established LC-MS/MS method. Sufficient stability of amisulpride in plasma was achieved during freeze-thaw-cycles, for storage periods of 24h at room temperature and 20 days at <-20 degrees C as well as in extracts (storage conditions: <-20 degrees C, 6 days and 7 degrees C, 6 days) with mean relative deviations between - 2.83 and 2.91%. An example of a pharmacokinetic profile determined after administration of an amisulpride 200mg dose in a pilot study is given in this paper. A peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of 522.58 ng/ml was achieved after 3.55 h (t(max)). Corresponding values of areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 3405.35 ngh/ml (AUC(0-infinity)) and 3306.54 ngh/ml (AUC(0-tlast)) were obtained. The terminal plasma elimination half-life (t(1/2)) was 10.36 h.

Amisulpride↗

(-)S amisulpride binds with high affinity to cloned dopamine D(3) and D(2) receptors.

Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide antipsychotic with nanomolar affinity and high selectivity for dopamine D(2) and dopamine D(3) receptors. The interaction of racemic (+/-)RS amisulpride and its two enantiomers (+)R and (-)S with dopamine D(2) and dopamine D(3) receptors subtypes were compared with that of haloperidol. Binding studies were performed using either [3H]spiperone or [3H]nemonapride in baculovirus/Spodoptera frugiperda insect (Sf-9) cell system expressing either the human dopamine recombinant D(2)long (hD(2L)) or the rat dopamine recombinant D(3) (rD(3)) receptors. K(i) values at dopamine rD(3) receptors were similar regardless of the radioligand used, whereas at hD(2L) receptors values were higher using [3H]spiperone than [3H]nemonapride. However, the rank order of compound potency against radiolabeled spiperone or nemonapride both at dopamine hD(2L) and at dopamine rD(3) receptors was similar. (-)S amisulpride displaced [3H]spiperone or [3H]nemonapride binding from both dopamine hD(2L) or dopamine rD(3) receptors, being twofold more potent than the racemic form and 38-19-fold more potent than (+)R enantiomer. Both racemic and the (-)S enantiomer exhibited 2-4 ([3H]spiperone)- and 3-4 ([3H]nemonapride)-fold higher affinity than haloperidol for dopamine rD(3) receptor, respectively. The (+)R enantiomer has weaker affinity with respect to haloperidol for both dopamine hD(2L) and dopamine rD(3) receptors. Our results show that (-)S amisulpride is the active enantiomer of amisulpride, showing high affinity for dopamine D(3) and dopamine D(2) receptors.

Amisulpride↗

A comparison of paroxetine and amisulpride in the treatment of dysthymic disorder.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary data on the effects of paroxetine and amisulpride on depressive dimensions, analyzed by factor analysis, in dysthymic patients. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients with DSM IV criteria for DD without concurrent major depression were enrolled in this 8-week, open study, and 100 completed it. Symptom dimensions were identified by principal components analysis with the SAS Factor procedure. RESULTS: Results of the symptom rating scales indicated that both drugs were equally effective. Response rate was 65% both in the paroxetine and the amisulpride group and the proportions of patients achieving a final HRSD score < or =7 were 46.7 and 55%, respectively. MADRS factor analysis identified two factors at baseline: the first corresponding to the global severity of depression and the second to somatic symptoms. After 8 weeks of treatment only one factor could be substantiated. At week 4 both paroxetine and amisulpride produced significant improvements on factor 1 while at week 8 mean changes of factor 1 were greater in the amisulpride-treated patients. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation was the open-label design. CONCLUSIONS: Both paroxetine and amisulpride appear to be effective in the short-term management of DD, improving its most characteristic symptoms.

Administration, Oral↗

Combination of clozapine and amisulpride in treatment-resistant schizophrenia--case reports and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcome of patients suffering from schizophrenic psychoses has been considerably improved by atypical antipsychotics like clozapine and amisulpride. In patients whose symptomatology cannot be ameliorated by monotherapy, it might be necessary to combine two atypical antipsychotics. While clozapine interacts with a variety of neurotransmitter receptors, amisulpride predominantly binds with high affinity to D3/D2-dopamine receptors. Combination can be considered if a supplementary dopamine-receptor blockade is desired. METHODS: We report on the therapy of 15 patients using a combination regimen of amisulpride and clozapine. Data were collected from patient records. The case reports document previous treatment attempts, describe the reason for the combination therapy, and determine its effect. RESULTS: Major (six cases) or at least marked (eight cases) improvement of previously treatment-resistant positive and negative symptoms could be achieved by using a mean clozapine dose of 375 mg/day (serum level 0.38 mg/l) and an amisulpride dose of 527 mg/day. Additionally, by reducing the clozapine dose compared to monotherapy by 24 %, a significant reduction of side effects was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of amisulpride with clozapine considerably enriches the therapeutic arsenal in cases of severe schizophrenic psychoses. Additional prospective studies are needed in order to systematically evaluate this new treatment strategy.

Adult↗

Amisulpride: from animal pharmacology to therapeutic action.

Amisulpride is a benzamide derivative with a unique neurochemical and psychopharmacological profile. This compound has selective affinity for human dopamine D3 and D2 receptor subtypes in vitro (binding constant, K approximately 3 nmol/l) and blocks functional responses mediated by these receptors. In ex vivo binding studies, amisulpride is twice as selective for D3 as for D2 receptors. At low doses, it preferentially blocks presynaptic dopamine autoreceptors (increase in dopamine release in vivo in the rat olfactory tubercle, 50% effective dose, ED50 3.7 mg/kg), while postsynaptic dopamine receptor antagonism is apparent at higher doses (decrease in striatal acetylcholine levels, ED50 approximately 60 mg/kg). Anisulpride preferentially stimulates dopamine synthesis and displaces 3H-raclopride binding in vivo in the limbic system rather than the striatum. It antagonizes apomorphine-induced hypothermia in mice and amphetamine-induced hypermotility in rats at low doses (ED50 2-3 mg/kg), blocks apomorphine-induced climbing and spontaneous grooming in mice, blocks apomorphine-induced gnawing in rats at higher doses (ED50 19-115 mg/kg) and does not induce catalepsy at 100 mg/kg. The preferential antagonism by amisulpride of presynaptic D2/D3 receptors is reflected behaviourally in the potent blockade of apomorphine-induced effects mediated by dopamine autoreceptors (yawning and hypomotility: ED50 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively) compared with those medicated by postsynaptic D2 receptors (e.g. gnawing: ED50 115 mg/kg). Moreover, low doses of amisulpride induce prohedonic (potentiation of food-induced place preference) effects in rats. The atypical neurochemical and psychopharmacological profiles of amisulpride may explain its therapeutic efficacy on both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Amisulpride↗

Faster response on amisulpride 50 mg versus sertraline 50-100 mg in patients with dysthymia or double depression: a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study.

Amisulpride (50 mg o.d.) was compared with sertraline (50-100 mg o.d.) for 12 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study in 313 outpatients with dysthymia (DSM-IV +/- episode of major depression). Full response rate [> or = 50% decrease in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) total score] was higher with amisulpride after 4 weeks (63% versus 50%, P < 0.02) and 8 weeks (82% versus 69%, P < 0.009). Time to initial improvement (> or = 25% decrease in HAMD total score) and to > or = 50% HAMD decrease were significantly shorter with amisulpride (P < 0.0033 and P < 0.0080, respectively). A faster response was also present in the subgroup of patients with pure dysthymia. The improvement in HAMD, Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Social and Occupational Assessment Scale total scores, as well as Clinical Global Impression improvement, was significantly greater with amisulpride after 4 weeks. Both drugs were equally effective at week 12. The tolerability of both drugs was satisfactory. Amisulpride is significantly more effective than sertraline during the first weeks of treatment in dysthymia.

Adolescent↗

Ziprasidone and amisulpride effectively treat negative symptoms of schizophrenia: results of a 12-week, double-blind study.

We compared the efficacy of ziprasidone and amisulpride in the treatment of negative symptoms and overall psychopathology in subjects who had chronic schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms. This multicentre, 12-week, double-blind study randomly assigned subjects with predominantly negative-symptom schizophrenia [i.e. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Subscale score >or=6 points greater than Positive Subscale score] to ziprasidone (40-80 mg b.i.d.; n=60) or amisulpride (50-100 mg b.i.d.; n=63). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale score. Secondary efficacy variables included change in scores for PANSS Total, Global Assessment of Functioning, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale derived from PANSS Total and Core, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity and CGI-Improvement. For the change in PANSS Negative Subscale score, a ratio to assess the equivalence of the treatment groups was calculated from the least squares mean changes from baseline, with equivalence claimed if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the ratio exceeded 0.60. Mean daily dose, adjusted for differential numbers of subjects and differential days between visits, was 118.0 mg for ziprasidone and 144.7 mg for amisulpride. Mean PANSS Negative Subscale scores improved over the 12-week treatment period for intent-to-treat subjects, evaluable subjects (subjects with >or=4 weeks of double-blind treatment and no protocol deviations) and completers in both treatment groups. Ziprasidone demonstrated efficacy comparable to amisulpride in improving negative symptoms and global psychopathology. The groups demonstrated comparable improvements in secondary efficacy variables. Both agents were generally well tolerated, with comparably low incidences of movement disorders. In subjects with negative symptom-prominent schizophrenia, ziprasidone in mean daily doses of 118 mg was equivalent to amisulpride in mean daily doses of 148 mg in ameliorating negative symptoms and comparable in improving overall psychopathology and global illness severity.

Adult↗

The effects of amisulpride on five dimensions of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia: a prospective open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antipsychotics can be evaluated using the dimensional models of schizophrenic symptoms. The D2/D3-selective antagonist amisulpride has shown similar efficacy and tolerability to other atypical antipsychotics. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of amisulpride on the dimensional model of schizophrenic symptoms and tolerability in latin schizophrenic patients. METHOD: Eighty schizophrenic patients were enrolled and 70 completed a prospective open-label 3-month study with amisulpride. The schizophrenic symptoms, psychosocial functioning and side-effects were evaluated with standardized scales. RESULTS: The patients showed significant improvement in the five dimensions evaluated. Amisulpride (median final dose 357.1 mg/d) was well-tolerated without treatment-emergent extrapyramidal side-effects. CONCLUSION: Amisulpride showed efficacy on different psychopathological dimensions and was well tolerated, leading to consider this drug a first line choice for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Adult↗

Treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia with amisulpride.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of low doses of certain neuroleptics in improving negative symptoms is still controversial. This study assessed the efficacy of amisulpride, a benzamide which increases dopaminergic transmission at low doses via presynaptic dopamine receptor blockade, on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. METHOD: The study was designed as a parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients had to fulfil DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia, Andreasen's criteria for negative schizophrenia, and to have a total score of at least 75 on the SANS; those treated with neuroleptics or antidepressants underwent a six-week placebo wash-out. One hundred and four in-patients were randomly assigned to amisulpride 100 mg/d, amisulpride 300 mg/d, or placebo for six weeks; 85 patients completed the study. RESULTS: Both amisulpride doses were significantly more effective than placebo on the primary evaluation criterion (SANS total score, MANOVA P < 0.02). No significant changes were found in positive symptoms or in extrapyramidal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Negative symptoms can be improved by low doses of amisulpride, favouring the hypothesis of dopaminergic hypofunction as one of the causes of negative symptoms.

Adult↗

One-year, low-dose neuroleptic study of in-patients with chronic schizophrenia characterised by persistent negative symptoms. Amisulpride v. haloperidol.

BACKGROUND: Amisulpride is a potent substituted benzamide antipsychotic drug claimed to improve the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, particularly at low dosage. METHOD: Sixty long-term in-patients with schizophrenia and selected for predominant negative symptoms were randomised to receive either haloperidol or amisulpride. Over a year there was systematic dose reduction, as symptoms allowed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the proportion receiving low-dose treatment, the control of positive symptoms, or ratings of social behaviour, side-effects or tardive dyskinesia. For negative symptoms, there were consistent but non-significant trends in favour of amisulpride. The amisulpride patients required significantly less anticholinergic medication. CONCLUSIONS: In chronically-hospitalised in-patients with schizophrenia characterised by persistent negative symptoms, amisulpride was a well-tolerated maintenance antipsychotic medication. The drug had only a limited effect in reducing negative symptoms, which were relatively stable, enduring phenomena in this sample, despite dosage reduction.

Adult↗

Pheochromocytoma unmasked by amisulpride and tiapride.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the unmasking of pheochromocytoma in a patient treated with amisulpride and tiapride. CASE SUMMARY: A 42-year-old white man developed acute hypertension with severe headache and vomiting 2 hours after the first doses of amisulpride 100 mg and tiapride 100 mg. Both drugs were immediately discontinued, and the patient recovered after subsequent nicardipine and verapamil treatment. Abdominal ultrasound showed an adrenal mass, and postoperative histologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. DISCUSSION: Drug-induced symptoms of pheochromocytoma are often associated with the use of substituted benzamide drugs, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. In our case, use of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a possible relationship between the hypertensive crisis and amisulpride and tiapride therapy. CONCLUSIONS: As of March 24, 2005, this is the first reported case of amisulpride- and tiapride-induced hypertensive crisis in a patient with pheochromocytoma. Physicians and other healthcare professionals should be aware of this potential adverse effect of tiapride and amisulpride.

Adult↗

Amisulpride: a review of its efficacy in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the new atypical antipsychotic drug, amisulpride. METHOD: Studies comparing the efficacy of amisulpride with that of haloperidol and risperidone, respectively, are reviewed. Outcome measures were Clinical Global Impression, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Positive And Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) scores. RESULTS: Amisulpride was at least as effective as haloperidol and risperidone in the improvement of positive symptoms, and significantly more efficacious than haloperidol in reducing PANSS negative subscores (P=0.038) in patients with acute exacerbations. Amisulpride demonstrated a greater improvement in BPRS total scores (P<0.05) and PANSS negative subscores (P=0.0001) than haloperidol after 12 months of treatment in chronic schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbations. CONCLUSION: Amisulpride can thus be considered for use as first-line treatment of acute and chronic schizophrenia.

Acute Disease↗

Dopaminergic deficit and the role of amisulpride in the treatment of mood disorders.

Amisulpride has now been investigated extensively in placebo controlled and in comparator controlled studies in patients suffering from dysthymia, both pure dysthymia and dysthymia with major depression. The clinical trial programme, which has shown the significant efficacy of amisulpride compared with placebo in three placebo controlled studies, has provided useful evidence of the value of a dopaminergic compound in the treatment of mood disorders. Amisulpride was superior to sertraline, an established treatment for depression and for dysthymia, on some measures and had a faster onset of effect. Retrospective analysis of the individual scale items showed that amisulpride had a broad range of effect on depressive symptoms with possible superiority on certain symptoms thought to be related to dopaminergic mechanisms. The body of studies supports the view that amisulpride is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for dysthymia and dysthymia with major depression.

Amisulpride↗

[Costs related to change to amisulpride in patients suffering from schizophrenia].

OBJECTIVES: The present research studied the cost effects of converting patients suffering from schizophrenia to the use of amisulpride, in order to learn whether the relatively higher medicine costs were compensated for under the Hungarian economic and financing conditions. METHODS: We analysed and compared costs having occurred before and after conversion in the case of 76 patients suffering from schizophrenia who got amisulpride instead of other typical or atypical antipsychotics in hospital. The analysis adhered to the methodology introduced by Agnes Rupp. RESULTS: In conformity with earlier investigations in Hungary performed with atypical antipsychotics, amisulpride has also proved its cost neutrality under local economic and financing conditions. Namely, higher disbursements for medicaments are compensated for by productivity increase, indicative of amisulpride's effectiveness, implying decreased economic (and other) burdens to family members. Te remarkable cost ratio improvement in case of patients defined as therapy resistant has played an important role in cost neutrality. CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride is an effective antipsychotic which can be prescribed without increasing costs, and in case of therapy resistant patients, it appears to have significant cost sparing effects.

Adult↗

[Fatal intoxication with amisulpride and presentation of organ distribution].

Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide used as an atypical antipsychotic drug. It antagonizes dopamine D2 and D3 receptor-mediated effects with greater affinity for the limbic system suggesting better neurological tolerance than classical neuroleptics. However, occasionally amisulpride intoxications associated with seizures, comatose conditions and agitation, hyperthermia, tachycardia, prolongation of the QT interval and extrapyramidal features have been described. A 27-year-old female with a medical history of psychosis and amisulpride therapy was found dead at home. By means of high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) an amisulpride concentration of 13.4 mg/l was found in the peripheral blood. A lower concentration in the brain and an extremely high concentration in bile can be explained by the polarity and hydrophobic character of the substance. After macroscopic and histological exclusion of other causes of death the results of the toxicological analysis were consistent with the assumption of a fatal amisulpride overdose.

Adult↗