Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Allergoids”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Randomised controlled trial of local allergoid immunotherapy on allergic inflammation in mite-induced rhinoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Non-injective routes of immunotherapy are thought to be valuable therapeutic options for respiratory allergy. We investigated the clinical efficacy and the effects of sublingual/oral immunotherapy on conjunctival allergic inflammation in patients with mite-induced respiratory allergy. METHODS: We used a double-blind placebo-controlled design. 20 patients with mite-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (six of whom also had mild asthma) were randomly assigned sublingual/oral immunotherapy (n=10) or placebo (n=10) for 2 years. We assessed symptom score by diary cards and inflammatory-cell infiltrate, and expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in the conjunctiva after specific allergen challenge at enrollment and after 12 and 24 months of treatment. FINDINGS: We found significantly lower symptom scores in the immunotherapy group than in the placebo group in most of the winter months (p=0.05). Compared with the placebo group, inflammatory-cell infiltration after conjunctival challenge, and ICAM-1 expression on conjunctival epithelium decreased significantly in the first year of treatment in the immunotherapy group (p=0.04 and p=0.02, respectively). These effects were also seen for the minimum persistent inflammation, in symptom-free patients exposed constantly to allergens (p=0.02). Serum concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein decreased significantly (p=0.04). Immunotherapy was well tolerated and compliance was good. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that this immunotherapy is clinically effective in rhinoconjunctivitis and that it decreases the immune-mediated inflammatory responses to the allergen.

Administration, Sublingual↗
PubMed2005

Clinical effects of specific immunotherapy: a two-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a one year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: A new depot allergoid of house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus - D.pt) has been created in line with the principles and methodology established in the successful development of pollen allergoids. A two-year double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, with one further follow-up year of active treatment, has been conducted to assess clinical efficacy and tolerance. METHODS: 40 patients (20 verum and 20 placebo) with IgE-mediated mite allergy and a history of moderate to severe perennial symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma participated in a 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Actively treated patients were included in a follow-up year. Active treatment was performed with an aluminium hydroxide adsorbed house dust mite allergoid. Parameters for baseline data and clinical efficacy: nasal challenge, quantitative skin prick testing, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), patients' diaries, physician's assessment of patients? health condition, symptoms and use of anti-allergic medication as well as adverse reactions and changes in specific IgG4 and IgE antibodies. RESULTS: The trial detected superiority (p < 0.05) of mite depot allergoid versus placebo with regard to VAS and symptom intensity sum score in patients who needed anti-allergic medication in the baseline period. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between verum and placebo groups were also seen for patients' reactivities to nasal challenges and prick tests with allergen. The blinded assessment by the physician documented a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the groups in favour of active treatment. After reaching the maximum dose as well as after 12 and 24 months, specific IgG4 antibody concentrations were significantly elevated in the verum group (p < 0.05) by comparison with placebo. Local reactions were less frequent in the verum group and no systemic adverse reactions occurred. A third year of active treatment resulted in further improvement and documented the advantage of booster therapy to stabilize the clinical success. CONCLUSION: Specific immunotherapy with a mite depot allergoid induced significant clinical improvements versus placebo. Safety was assessed as excellent, and no systemic adverse reactions occurred.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1983

Local intranasal immunotherapy for grass-allergic rhinitis.

In a double-blind controlled study, local intranasal immunotherapy was evaluated for the treatment of grass pollenosis. On the basis of serum grass-specific IgE levels, 50 grass-allergic patients were randomly divided into three groups and treated with either an aqueous solution of mixed-grass extract, a formaldehyde-modified mixed-grass extract (allergoid), or a histamine solution (placebo). Intranasal solutions were administered in gradually increasing doses over a preseasonal 10 wk period, adverse local reactions from the aqueous grass extract were frequent during treatment. Few adverse reactions occurred from the allergoid or histamine solutions. During the pollen season, patients receiving both grass extracts had much lower symptom/medication scores than patients receiving placebo. The severity of eye symptoms was the same in all groups. After treatment, serum grass-specific IgE rose in patients receiving aqueous and allergoid extract; no change was noted in patients receiving placebo therapy. Grass nasal secretory-specific IgA titers in each group did not change during the study. The results of this study suggest that local intranasal immunotherapy with either aqueous or allergoid grass extracts is clinically effective for the treatment of grass pollenosis. Adverse reactions associated with the aqueous extract may limit its usefulness. No correlation was present between the secretory immune response and clinical benefit.

Administration, Intranasal↗