Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Alendronate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Disposition of alendronate following local delivery in a rat jaw.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we have shown that local delivery of alendronate reduced significantly bone resorption activated by surgical separation of periosteum from bone. These results advocate the use of local application of alendronate in bone surgeries to prevent regional bone resorption at the surgery site. Here we investigated the efficacy of absorbtion of alendronate by the bone from a gelatin sponge soaked with radiolabeled alendronate applied topically at the surgical site. METHODS: Following elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap next to premolars and molars of the rat mandible, a gelatin sponge soaked with 10 microl of radiolabled alendronate (1 microCi/mg) was applied to exposed bone on one side. The local absorbtion of alendronate and its disposition in the contralateral side of the mandible as well as in the tibia bone were analyzed. RESULTS: The results show that 10% of total alendronate content of the gelatin sponge was absorbed in the bone locally (in the surgical site), while 0.2% was disposed in the tibia. Of interest is the fact that the surgical wound in the contralateral side increased the disposition of alendronate up to 2%. This finding is most likely the result of extravasation and diffusion of alendronate due to surgical wounding. CONCLUSION: This study strongly supports our notion that local delivery of alendronate and its affinity to bone may become a very important treatment modality to prevent resorption of bone during dental and orthopedic procedures.

Absorption↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Renal handling of alendronate in rats. An uncharacterized renal transport system.

Alendronate (4-amino-1-hydroxybutylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate), an antiosteolytic agent, is currently under investigation in the treatment of a variety of bone diseases. Earlier studies from this laboratory have demonstrated that systemically administered alendronate is rapidly either taken up by bone tissues or excreted by the kidney, and that renal excretion is the only route of elimination. The purpose of this study is to characterize the renal handling of alendronate in rats by standard clearance procedures with inulin as a marker of glomerular filtration rate. Alendronate is highly bound to rat serum protein. The excretion of alendronate by the kidney is concentration-and dose-dependent, and saturable, indicating that it is secreted by an active transport mechanism. The secretory mechanism exhibits limitation of transport, with an apparent Tm of approximately 25 micrograms/min/kg. However, high doses of cimetidine, quinine, probenecid, and p-aminohippuric acid had no effect on the renal excretion of alendronate, suggesting that alendronate is not secreted by anionic or cationic transport systems. In contrast, alendronate clearance is inhibited by etidronate, another bisphosphonate, in a dose-dependent manner, implying that these two bisphosphonates compete for an as yet uncharacterized renal transport system. As expected, the renal excretion of alendronate is drastically reduced in rats with acute renal failure. As a consequence of renal impairment, alendronate accumulates in plasma, and the concentration of the drug in bone tissues increases significantly.

Alendronate↗
PubMed1997

Osteoclast activation: potent inhibition by the bisphosphonate alendronate through a nonresorptive mechanism.

Alendronate, an aminobisphosphonate used in the treatment of osteoporosis, is a potent inhibitor of bone resorption. Its mechanism of action is unknown. Because it localizes to bone surfaces, we compared the sensitivity of components of the resorptive process to incubation on alendronate-coated bone surfaces. We found that bone resorption by osteoclasts isolated from neonatal rat bone was unaffected by alendronate (10(-4) M). Osteoclast production in bone marrow cultures, as assessed by the production of calcitonin-receptor positive cells, was observed even at 10(-4) M, but bone resorption in these cultures was almost completely abolished by 10(-5) M alendronate. The greater sensitivity of osteoclast activation to inhibition by alendronate that these results suggest was supported by similar inhibition of osteoblast-mediated activation of osteoclasts from neonatal rat bone. Thus, activation of osteoclasts by osteoblastic/stromal cells is apparently the most sensitive component of the pathway whereby bone resorption is affected. Moreover, the ability of alendronate to suppress osteoclastic activation does not depend on resorption-mediated release of alendronate from bone surfaces. This ability extends the range of cell types and processes that might be affected by alendronate, beyond those in the immediate vicinity of resorbing cells, to include any cell that comes into contact with alendronate-coated bone surfaces.

Acid Phosphatase↗
PubMed2005

Inhibition of inflammatory and bone-resorption-inhibitory effects of alendronate by etidronate.

Among the bisphosphonates (BPs), the aminobisphosphonates (aminoBPs) have much stronger bone-resorption-inhibitory activities (BRIAs) than nonaminobisphosphonates (nonaminoBPs). However, aminoBPs have inflammatory effects. We previously reported that in mice: (i) all aminoBPs tested (10-40 micromol/kg) induced various inflammatory reactions (including induction of histidine decarboxylase), whereas clodronate (a non-aminoBP) (10-160 micromol/kg) inhibited these reactions; and (ii) a clear sclerotic line (tentatively called the BP line) was detectable in the tibia by radiography a few weeks after a single injection of either alendronate (a typical aminoBP) (1.6 micromol/kg) or clodronate (160 micromol/kg), and this BP-line formation (a marker for the BRIAs of BPs) was not reduced in mice given both alendronate and clodronate. In this study, using this murine model, we compared clodronate, etidronate (another typical non-aminoBP), alendronate, etidronate + alendronate, and clodronate + alendronate in terms of their inflammatory effects and/or BP-line formation. For BP-line formation, 480 micromol/kg etidronate was needed (single injection). At 160 micromol/kg, etidronate inhibited the histidine decarboxylase induction, but not the other inflammatory reactions induced by alendronate. However, etidronate (unlike clodronate) also inhibited alendronate-induced BP-line formation (even at 40 micromol/kg). Etidronate (160 micromol/kg) also inhibited the physicochemical changes in the tibia induced by six, weekly injections of alendronate. Therefore, depending on the dose, etidronate can inhibit alendronate's inflammatory actions and its BRIA. These results, together with those reported previously, suggest that a strategy utilizing clodronate (but not etidronate) plus an aminoBP might prevent or reduce the inflammatory side effects induced by aminoBPs while preserving their powerful BRIAs. We discuss the mechanisms underlying the antagonism between aminoBPs and non-aminoBPs.

Alendronate↗
PubMed1998

Application of a new serum assay for type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides: assessment of diurnal changes in bone turnover with and without alendronate treatment.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are finding increased application in the investigation and management of skeletal diseases such as osteoporosis. The present study assessed for the first time the diurnal variation of serum type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTx), a new serum-based marker of bone resorption, and the effect of antiresorptive therapy with alendronate on this marker in elderly osteopenic women. The concentrations of serum NTx were monitored over 24 hours in a randomly selected subset of 38 women (placebo n = 13, 69 +/- 3 (SD) year; alendronate n = 25, 69 +/- 3 year), who had completed 12-15 months of a larger (n = 120) randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial with alendronate 5 mg/day. Blood was obtained every 4 hours for measurement of serum NTx using a new chemiluminescent-based immunoassay. There was a significant diurnal variation of serum NTx (p = 0.001) in both the placebo and alendronate groups. Mean peak levels occurred at approximately 0504 h with a mean nadir at approximately 1320 h in the placebo group, with no significant difference on alendronate. Serum NTx was approximately 25% lower in the alendronate group over the entire 24-hour period. Mean (SE) daytime (0800-2000) and nighttime (2200-0800) serum NTx values were 6.40 +/- 0.30 versus 8.45 +/- 0.58 nmol BCE/liter, and 7.42 +/- 0.23 versus 10.01 +/- 0.53 nmol BCE/liter for alendronate versus placebo, respectively (P < or = 0.003 for both comparisons). Combining the data of both treatment groups, serum NTx was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with serum osteocalcin (r = 0.753) and urine NTx (r = 0.628) measurements previously obtained over the entire 24-hour period. Serum NTx has a significant diurnal variation and is responsive to antiresorptive therapy with alendronate. Alendronate reduces the amplitude but maintains the pattern of the 24-hour serum NTx profile. These data suggest that serum NTx may be a useful new marker of bone resorption.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Effect of alendronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover in Thai postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Alendronate has recently been approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and its efficacy has been demonstrated in many Western countries. Our present study was performed to evaluate the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and its tolerability in Thais. Eighty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis participated in this study. After giving informed consent, the subjects were randomly allocated either 10 mg alendronate or placebo in a double-blind fashion. All patients received a supplement of 500 mg elemental calcium daily. BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal forearm was measured at baseline and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Biochemical markers of bone resorption were determined at baseline and 6 months after treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both alendronate- and placebo-treated groups. Ten subjects discontinued the study. Of 70 subjects, 32 received 10 mg alendronate daily and the remaining subjects received placebo. At 1 year, BMD in the alendronate-treated group had increased from baseline by 9.2%, 4.6%, and 3.1% at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal forearm, respectively. These percentages were greater than those in controls (4.1%, 0.6%, and 1.0%, respectively). Urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTx)-I and serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTx)-I levels decreased in both groups after 6 months of treatment. However, more reduction was demonstrated in the alendronate-treated group (71.9% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.01, and 84.7% vs. 33.1%, P < 0.01, respectively). Compliance with treatment and drug tolerability were good in both alendronate and placebo groups. We concluded that treatment with alendronate 10 mg daily for Thai postmenopausal women with osteoporosis significantly increased BMD at all skeletal sites and reduced biochemical markers of bone resorption. It was well tolerated without any serious side effects.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Alendronate reduced vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis: a 3-year follow-up study.

The risk-reducing effect of alendronate on vertebral fractures has been consistently reported. In a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled (1 microg alfacalcidol) double-dummy study, we also reported that alendronate (5.0 mg) had a fracture-reducing effect in Japanese patients with preexisting vertebral fractures. The present report describes the risk-reducing effect of alendronate (5.0 mg) for 3 years in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. The 3-year treatment period consisted of the original 2-year double-blind study followed by a 1-year extension. A total of 170 postmenopausal female patients were involved in the third year; 90 received alendronate and 80 received alfacalcidol. Both efficacy and safety were analyzed in these 170 patients. Vertebral fracture was determined by quantitative morphometry, and vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the DXA method (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of vertebral fracture, excluding fracture cases that occurred in the first 6 months after treatment initiation. The cumulative incidence of vertebral fracture at 3 years was 7.8% (7/90) in the alendronate group and 18.8% (15/80) in the alfacalcidol group, indicating a significantly reduced risk of fractures in the alendronate group (relative risk = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.18-0.97). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 9.2% in the alendronate group (n = 26) and by 1.4% in the alfacalcidol group (n = 22) at 3 years. The safety profile of alendronate during 3 years of treatment was similar to that of alfacalcidol. The present study thus demonstrated that treatment with alendronate 5.0 mg for 3 years increased vertebral BMD and reduced the risk of vertebral fractures in Japanese, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Randomized active and placebo-controlled endoscopy study of a novel protected formulation of oral alendronate.

Although generally well tolerated, oral aminobisphosphonates have been associated with sporadic cases of severe esophageal injury attributed to pill contact. A novel protected formulation of oral alendronate uses an inert cylindrical shell to prevent mucosal contact with intact tablets. An active and placebo-controlled endoscopy study was undertaken to assess mucosal injury associated with this protected formulation. Healthy volunteers with normal baseline endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive protected alendronate 70 mg/day, standard alendronate 70 mg/day, or placebo for 14 days. Endoscopy was repeated on days 8 and 15. Of 78 subjects, 30 received protected alendronate, 28 received standard alendronate, and 20 received placebo. Mean gastric injury scores did not differ significantly among treatment groups. However, subjects on standard alendronate were more likely than those on protected alendronate to develop severe gastric injury, defined as Lanza score 3 or 4 (67.9% versus 33.3%, P=.009), and more likely to develop a gastric ulcer (21.4% versus 3.3%, P=.015). No differences in symptoms or adverse events were observed. In conclusion, a novel protected formulation of oral alendronate is less likely than standard alendronate to induce severe mucosal injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Mutual augmentation of the induction of the histamine-forming enzyme, histidine decarboxylase, between alendronate and immuno-stimulants (IL-1, TNF, and LPS), and its prevention by clodronate.

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), powerful anti-bone-resorptive drugs, have inflammatory side effects, while histamine is not only an inflammatory mediator, but also an immuno-modifier. In murine models, a single intraperitoneal injection of an N-BP induces various inflammatory reactions, including the induction of the histamine-forming enzyme histidine decarboxylase (HDC) in tissues important in immune responses (such as liver, lungs, spleen, and bone marrow). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and TNF are also capable of inducing HDC. We reported previously that in mice, (i) the inflammatory actions of N-BPs depend on IL-1, (ii) N-BP pretreatment augments both LPS-stimulated IL-1 production and HDC induction, and (iii) the co-administration of clodronate (a non-N-BP) with an N-BP inhibits the latter's inflammatory actions (including HDC induction). Here, we add the new findings that (a) pretreatment with alendronate (a typical N-BP) augments both IL-1- and TNF-induced HDC elevations, (b) LPS pretreatment augments the alendronate-induced HDC elevation, (c) co-administration of clodronate with alendronate abolishes these augmentations, (d) alendronate does not induce HDC in IL-1-deficient mice even if they are pretreated with LPS, and (e) alendronate increases IL-1beta in all tissues tested, but not in the serum. These results suggest that (1) there are mutual augmentations between alendronate and immuno-stimulants (IL-1, TNF, and LPS) in HDC induction, (2) tissue IL-1beta is important in alendronate-stimulated HDC induction, and (3) combination use of clodronate may have the potential to reduce the inflammatory effects of alendronate (we previously found that clodronate, conveniently, does not inhibit the anti-bone-resorptive activity of alendronate).

Alendronate↗
PubMed1996

Effect of three years of oral alendronate treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: Oral alendronate sodium is a potent, specific inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. To assess its efficacy and safety, a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 478 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects received either placebo, alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day for 3 years, or 20 mg/day for 2 years followed by 5 mg/day for 1 year (20/5 mg). All subjects received 500 mg/day of supplemental calcium. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: After 3 years, alendronate 10 mg induced marked increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (9.6 +/- 0.4%), femoral neck (4.7 +/- 0.7%) and trochanter (7.4 +/- 0.6%) (mean +/- SE; each P < or = 0.001) versus decreases of 0.8 to 1.6% with placebo. Progressive increases at these sites in the alendoronate 10 mg group were significant during both the second and third years. Alendronate 10 mg increased total body BMD (1.6 +/- 0.3%, P < or = 0.001), and prevented loss but did not increase BMD at the 1/3 forearm site. Alendronate 20/5 mg was no more effective, whereas alendronate 5 mg was significantly less effective than 10 mg at all sites. Bone turnover decreased to a stable nadir over 3 months for resorption markers (urine deoxypyridinoline) and over 6 months for formation markers (alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin). Mean loss of stature was reduced by 41% in alendronate treated subjects (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of alendronate was similar to that of placebo. At 10 mg, there were no trends toward increased frequency of any adverse experience except for abdominal pain, which was usually mild, transient, and resolved with continued treatment. Thus, alendronate appears to be an important advance in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2003

Therapeutic equivalence of alendronate 35 milligrams once weekly and 5 milligrams daily in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alendronate 35 mg once weekly compared with alendronate 5 mg daily in the prevention of osteoporosis. METHODS: We compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with alendronate 35 mg once weekly (n = 362) and alendronate 5 mg daily (n = 361) in a 1-year, double-blind, multicenter study of postmenopausal women (6 months or greater), aged 40-70 years, with lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density T-scores between -2.5 and 1. The primary efficacy end point was the comparability of lumbar spine bone mineral density increases, defined by strict prespecified criteria. RESULTS: Mean increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density at 12 months were equivalent (difference between the alendronate 35-mg once-weekly group and the alendronate 5-mg daily group [90% confidence interval] at month 12 was -0.3% [-0.6, 0.1], well within the prespecified bounds of +/-1.0%). Bone mineral density increases at other skeletal sites and effects on bone turnover were also virtually identical for the two dosing regimens. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated, and the larger weekly unit dose was not associated with an increased frequency of upper gastrointestinal events. CONCLUSION: Alendronate 35 mg once weekly is therapeutically equivalent to alendronate 5 mg daily and provides patients with greater dosing convenience, in addition to the proven efficacy of alendronate and good tolerability.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1996

Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that alendronate can increase bone mineral density (BMD) and prevent radiographically defined (morphometric) vertebral fractures. The Fracture Intervention Trial aimed to investigate the effect of alendronate on the risk of morphometric as well as clinically evident fractures in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. METHODS: Women aged 55-81 with low femoral-neck BMD were enrolled in two study groups based on presence or absence of an existing vertebral fracture. Results for women with at least one vertebral fracture at baseline are reported here. 2027 women were randomly assigned placebo (1005) or alendronate (1022) and followed up for 36 months. The dose of alendronate (initially 5 mg daily) was increased (to 10 mg daily) at 24 months, with maintenance of the double blind. Lateral spine radiography was done at baseline and at 24 and 36 months. New vertebral fractures, the primary endpoint, were defined by morphometry as a decrease of 20% (and at least 4 mm) in at least one vertebral height between the baseline and latest follow-up radiograph. Non-spine clinical fractures were confirmed by radiographic reports. New symptomatic vertebral fractures were based on self-report and confirmed by radiography. FINDINGS: Follow-up radiographs were obtained for 1946 women (98% of surviving participants). 78 (8.0%) of women in the alendronate group had one or more new morphometric vertebral fractures compared with 145 (15.0%) in the placebo group (relative risk 0.53 [95% Cl 0.41-0.68]). For clinically apparent vertebral fractures, the corresponding numbers were 23 (2.3%) alendronate and 50 (5.0%) placebo (relative hazard 0.45 [0.27-0.72]). The risk of any clinical fracture, the main secondary endpoint, was lower in the alendronate than in the placebo group (139 [13.6%] vs 183 [18.2%]; relative hazard 0.72 [0.58-0.90]). The relative hazards for hip fracture and wrist fracture for alendronate versus placebo were 0.49 (0.23-0.99) and 0.52 (0.31-0.87). There was no significant difference between the groups in numbers of adverse experiences, including upper-gastrointestinal disorders. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that among women with low bone mass and existing vertebral fractures, alendronate is well tolerated and substantially reduces the frequency of morphometric and clinical vertebral fractures, as well as other clinical fractures.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Inhibition of mevalonate pathway is involved in alendronate-induced cell growth inhibition, but not in cytokine secretion from macrophages in vitro.

Bisphosphonates are antiresorptive drugs used for the treatment of metabolic bone diseases. They can be divided into two different pharmacological classes: nitrogen-containing and non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, like clodronate, are metabolised to a toxic ATP-analogue preventing osteoclast mediated bone resorption. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, including alendronate, prevent osteoclast function by inhibiting the mevalonate pathway. Clodronate is known to have anti-inflammatory properties while alendronate induces cytokine secretion from lipopolysaccharide- (LPS) induced macrophages. This study investigates whether the cytotoxicity and cytokine production induced by alendronate and LPS could be counteracted by clodronate or products of mevalonate pathway: oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), farnesol and geranylgeraniol. Treatment with alendronate increased LPS-induced secretion of IL-1beta, IL-6 and TNF-alpha from RAW 264 macrophages 2.4-, 1.4- and 1.8-fold, respectively. This treatment was cytotoxic for macrophages as indicated by lowered cell viability. Clodronate and ox-LDL both counteracted the cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity of alendronate. Farnesol and geranylgeraniol did neither reverse the cytokine secretion nor reduce the cytotoxicity of alendronate. Clodronate and ox-LDL were able to counteract the effects of alendronate on macrophages in vitro, probably by their known ability to inhibit DNA binding activity of transcription factors, nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and activating protein-1 (AP-1). These findings suggest that inhibition of mevalonate pathway is not the mechanism responsible for the proinflammatory response caused by alendronate, as it is in alendronate-induced apoptosis and prevention of osteoclast function.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2005

A randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-month study of once-weekly alendronate oral solution for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the overall safety and tolerability of once-weekly (OW) alendronate 70 mg oral solution (OS) versus OW placebo OS. METHODS: Postmenopausal, osteoporotic women were enrolled at 51 centers in the United States in a 6-month double-blind, randomized trial. Patients were randomized (1:1) to OW alendronate 70 mg OS or placebo OS. The primary end point was the proportion of patients reporting any upper gastrointestinal (UGI) adverse event (AE) at 6 months. Secondary end points included mean percentage change in urinary N-telopeptide of type I human collagen (NTx) and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) at 6 months. RESULTS: Initially, 454 women were enrolled; 392 (86.3%) completed the study. The mean (SD) age was 65.2 (10) years, and the mean (SD) time since menopause was 19.1 (12) years. The proportion of patients experiencing any UGI AE was significantly higher with alendronate OS (23.7%) compared with placebo solution (15.3%), with a treatment difference of 8.3% (95% CI, 0.8%-15.8%; P = 0.024). The proportion of patients experiencing any esophageal AE was 4.0% with alendronate and 3.0% with placebo (treatment difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -2.7% to 4.8%]). In addition, 4.5% of alendronate and 8.7% of placebo patients discontinued the study due to any clinical AE, and 3.3% of alendronate and 1.8% of placebo patients discontinued due to a UGI AE (difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -1.5% to 4.4%]). Alendronate OS produced significantly greater reductions in both NTx and BSAP than placebo (differences, -47.5% and -38.7%, respectively [both, P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: In this 6-month study, patients receiving OW alendronate 70 mg OS had a higher rate of UGI AEs than placebo patients. However, rates of serious UGI AEs, discontinuations due to UGI AEs, and esophageal AEs were similar between groups. UGI AEs in the study were generally mild to moderate in severity and did not result in treatment discontinuation. In addition, OW alendronate 70 mg OS significantly reduced biochemical markers of bone turnover.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Effects of short-term alendronate treatment on the three-dimensional microstructural, physical, and mechanical properties of dog trabecular bone.

The bisphosphonate, alendronate, is well known for its potent inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. It has been used clinically for the treatment of osteoporosis and has also recently been used to reduce osteolysis around prostheses in a canine revision model of implant loosening (femoral condyle). In this study, the effects of alendronate on trabecular bone properties were assessed in dogs at an oral dose of 0.5 mg/kg per day over a 12 week period, and compared with control dogs. Cubic cancellous bone specimens were produced from lumbar vertebrae (L-1 and L-2) and bilateral proximal humeri. These specimens were scanned using a high-resolution microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) system. From accurate data sets, three-dimensional microstructural properties were calculated and physical and mechanical properties were determined. Treatment with alendronate increased bone volume fraction by 9.5%, 7.7%, 7.4%, and 18.4%, respectively, in L-1, L-2, humeral greater tuberosity, and humeral head trabecular bone. In the lumbar vertebrae, the alendronate-treated trabeculae were thicker and lower in bone surface-to-volume ratio. In the greater tuberosity, the alendronate-treated trabeculae were thicker, lower in bone surface-to-volume ratio, and less anisotropic. In the humeral head, the alendronate-treated trabeculae were thicker, less anisotropic, lower in surface density, and showed decreased trabecular separation. Alendronate significantly increased apparent density and collagen density in the lumbar vertebrae and humeral heads, and significantly decreased collagen concentration in the vertebrae. In the lumbar vertebrae, Young's modulus in the cephalocaudal direction, ultimate stress, and failure energy were significantly increased in the alendronate-treated group. The changes in mechanical properties in the humeral head trabecular bone were similar to those seen in the lumbar vertebrae. Our results demonstrate that alendronate increases the mechanical properties of healthy canine trabecular bone after short-term treatment. The physical and microstructural changes of trabecular bone are consistent with the significantly increased mechanical properties.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2003

Alendronate has a residual effect on bone mass in postmenopausal Danish women up to 7 years after treatment withdrawal.

Alendronate has been shown to reduce bone turnover and increase bone mass. However, little is known about the duration of the effect on bone after treatment withdrawal. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover of various alendronate regimens after treatment withdrawal. In this study, we followed 203 postmenopausal women who previously participated in two alendronate randomized placebo-controlled trials. Daily oral treatment with various doses of alendronate (2.5-20 mg) were given for 2, 4, or 6 yr followed by no treatment for 7, 5, or 3 yr, respectively. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were induced serum C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX) and osteocalcin. Women who received alendronate (2.5-10 mg per day) for 2 yr had a 3.8% higher BMD compared to those receiving placebo when assessed 7 yr after withdrawal. The residual effect was proportionally larger in women who had received treatment for 4 (5.9%, P=0.02) or 6 yr (8.6%, P=0.002), respectively. However, the largest residual effect was found in women treated with alendronate 20 mg per day for 2 yr (9.7%, P=0.01 vs. placebo). The rate of bone loss after alendronate withdrawal was comparable to the bone loss observed in the placebo group. Bone markers tended to reverse back to normal levels, but were still affected even several years after withdrawal of treatment. This study has demonstrated that the efficacy of alendronate in preventing bone loss was proportional to the duration of treatment. The rate of bone loss after withdrawal of alendronate corresponded to the normal postmenopausal rate of bone loss. A residual effect on BMD was found up to 7 yr after treatment withdrawal.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Effect of alendronate on cultured normal human osteoblasts.

Alendronate is an aminobisphosphonate with a potent anti-reabsorptive action that does not appear to interfere with bone mineralization, and is even able to increase bone mineral density in osteoporotic postmenopausal women through a still not fully understood mechanism. This study was conducted to assess the direct effect of alendronate on diverse aspects of normal human osteoblast physiology. For that purpose, the in vitro effect of a wide range of concentrations [from 10(-1) to 10(-12) mol/L] of alendronate on cell viability, proliferation, collagen synthesis, and the mineral-depositing capacity of normal human osteoblasts was tested. Alendronate effects were examined at 48 and 96 h of culture in the presence or absence of fetal calf serum. In vitro alendronate affected osteoblast viability at concentrations equal to or higher than 10(-4) mol/L. At concentrations equal to or higher than 10(-3) mol/L, no viable cells were observed in cultures. In vitro alendronate at concentrations between 10(-5) and 10(-12) mol/L did not have any effect on the proliferative capacity of normal human osteoblasts determined by two different techniques: (1) tritiated thymidine incorporation to DNA and (2) cell counting. Collagen synthesis by normal human osteoblasts showed a tendency to decrease following incubation with alendronate supplemented with fetal calf serum. This decrease was only statistically significant after 96 h of culture; however, a dose-response effect could not be documented. Finally, no effect of alendronate was observed on calcium deposition in vitro by normal human osteoblasts at concentrations equal to or lower than 10(-5) mol/L. In conclusion, the present study shows that alendronate in vitro does not affect viability, proliferation, and mineral deposit capacity of normal human osteoblasts at the concentration at which it inhibits by 50% the resorptive capacity of osteoclasts that for this drug has been reported as 2 x 10(-9) mol/L.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Alendronate increases spine and hip bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who failed to respond to intermittent cyclical etidronate.

In a U.S. multicenter study of intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, approximately 20% of patients were nonresponders, defined as failure to increase spine bone mineral density. In contrast, essentially all patients who received 10 mg of alendronate daily in U.S. phase III trials showed some increase in spine bone mineral density. The current study was undertaken to determine the response to alendronate therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who were nonresponders to intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy. Twenty-five women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (mean +/- SD: 65.1+/-1.9 years of age), previously treated with intermittent cyclical etidronate with no increase of spine bone mineral density, and who agreed to be changed to alendronate, were recruited from a university out-patient clinic specializing in the treatment of osteoporosis for a prospective observational study. Measurements included bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and biochemical markers of bone remodeling (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase by immunoassay and urine deoxypyridinoline by high-pressure liquid chromatography). Patients had received intermittent cyclical etidronate for 3.3+/-0.4 years, during which time their bone density declined at spine and hip sites. They were then changed to alendronate 10 mg/day, which they received for 1.3+/-0.1 years; after treatment with alendronate, bone mineral density increased significantly at the lumbar spine (4.4+/-0.7% annualized,p < 0.0001) and at all hip sites. Bone markers also changed significantly after alendronate treatment: urine deoxypyridinoline fell from 6.8+/-0.8 to 5.5+/-0.6 micromol/mol creatinine (p < 0.0001) and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase rose from 4.6+/-0.5 to 11.9+/-1.0 ng/mL (p < 0.0001). Upper gastrointestinal side effects forced 4 of 25 patients (16%) to discontinue alendronate. Alendronate increases bone density at the spine and hip in patients who have not responded to intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy. Changes in bone markers suggest that alendronate causes more complete suppression of bone resorption and less inhibition (or stimulation) of bone formation.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗