SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Academic Medical Centers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

502 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Real-world clinical utility of exome sequencing in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: Experience from a tertiary center in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Genomic testing has increasingly contributed to the diagnosis and management of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), particularly in patients with suspected genetic etiologies. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield and real- world clinical utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in children with DRE. METHODS: Children with DRE and seizure onset before 15 years of age were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Clinical data, including demographics, seizure characteristics, developmental history, electroencephalography (EEG), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prior investigations, were reviewed. WES was performed in all probands and, when available, their parents. Variants were interpreted according to standard guidelines. Clinical utility and 1-year seizure and developmental outcomes were assessed from follow-up records. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (23 males, 33 females) were included. The median age at seizure onset was 1 year (interquartile range [IQR] 0.3-4 years), and 96.4% had developmental comorbidities. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 39% (22/56), with the highest diagnostic yield in children with seizure onset before 3 years of age. Channelopathies accounted for most genetically solved cases (68%), predominantly involving sodium channel genes. Genetic diagnoses provided clinical utility in 73% (16/22) of solved cases by guiding treatment and precision management. At 1-year follow-up, genetically solved patients showed more favorable seizure and developmental outcomes than those with genetically unsolved patients. CONCLUSION: WES achieved a 39% diagnostic yield and substantial clinical utility in pediatric DRE, particularly in early-onset and channelopathy-related disorders. These findings support early molecular diagnosis to facilitate genotype-informed management in appropriately selected children. However, the more favorable developmental and seizure outcomes observed in genetically solved patients should be interpreted with caution, as they may have been influenced by multiple factors beyond genetic diagnosis. In resource-limited settings, careful clinical phenotyping remains essential for treatment decisions and for prioritizing children for genomic testing.

Clinical utility↗

PubMed2026

Clinical features and outcomes of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus from a single-center retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The role of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains unclear. ANCA positivity has been linked to more severe disease and possible overlap with ANCA-associated vasculitis, but available data are inconsistent. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of SLE patients treated at the University Hospital in Kraków (2012-2022). Patients fulfilled the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria. ANCA positivity (anti-MPO or anti-PR3) was confirmed by ELISA. Clinical features, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 1039 SLE patients, 18 (1.73%) were ANCA-positive (anti-MPO, 72.22%; anti-PR3, 27.78%). Most ANCA-positive SLE patients were female (88.89%), with a median age at disease onset of 35.5 years. The most common manifestations in ANCA-positive cases were hematological abnormalities (100%), constitutional symptoms (88.89%), and joint involvement (88.89%). Renal involvement was observed in 72.22% (n = 13) of ANCA-positive SLE patients; however, lupus nephritis was confirmed by kidney biopsy in only seven cases. Vasculitis was rare (5.56%). Anti-dsDNA (61.11%) and anti-SSA (50%) were the most frequent autoantibodies. No significant differences were found between anti-MPO and anti-PR3 subgroups. Most ANCA-positive patients received glucocorticoids (94.44%), cyclophosphamide (61.11%), and antimalarials (61.11%). No statistically significant differences were observed between the ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative groups (p > 0.05 for all parameters). CONCLUSIONS: ANCA positivity in SLE is rare and predominantly associated with anti-MPO antibodies. It is linked to frequent renal involvement but infrequent vasculitis. No differences were observed between ANCA subtypes, suggesting no distinct clinical phenotype. Key Points • ANCA positivity was rare in this systemic lupus erythematosus cohort (1.73%) and was predominantly associated with anti-MPO antibodies rather than anti-PR3 antibodies. • No significant differences in demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, or autoantibody profiles were observed between ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative patients. Similarly, no significant differences were identified between the anti-PR3-positive and anti-MPO-positive groups. • ANCA-positive SLE was commonly associated with the need for intensive immunosuppressive treatment, highlighting its potential relevance as a marker of severe disease course.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Micro- and nanoplastics-induced neurotoxicity: a CNS-centered, evidence-graded adverse outcome pathway framework based on systematic weight-of-evidence assessment.

Micro- and nanoplastics (MPs/NPs) are ubiquitous anthropogenic particulate pollutants posing emerging threats to human neurological health. Severe heterogeneity in particle physicochemical properties, environmental aging status, exposure paradigms and experimental platforms has created persistent mechanistic uncertainties in MP/NP neurotoxicology, hindering reliable hazard characterization and risk translation. Here, we systematically consolidate empirical toxicological evidence and construct a dedicated central nervous system (CNS)-targeted adverse outcome pathway (AOP) network integrated with rigorous weight-of-evidence (WoE) grading to elucidate the hierarchical, particle-specific toxic cascades underlying MP/NP-induced neural injury. Our synthesis overturns the conventional linear toxicity paradigm, demonstrating that MPs/NPs trigger neurotoxicity via a complex multi-input mechanistic network. We definitively establish oxidative stress as a robust early convergent key event-rather than a universal molecular initiating event-orchestrating ROS overproduction, lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation to propagate neuronal damage. This core module is driven by five distinct particulate upstream triggers: particle-biomolecule interfacial perturbation, corona-facilitated cellular internalization, plastic-associated chemical leaching, aging-derived free radical reactivity, and gut-borne systemic neurotoxic signaling. Downstream pathogenic outcomes encompass glial overactivation, neurotransmitter dyshomeostasis, autophagy-lysosome dysfunction, metabolic reprogramming, regulated neuronal cell death, and behavioral impairments. Tiered WoE analysis confirms strong validation for early oxidative/inflammatory cascades, moderate support for gut-brain axis crosstalk and intracellular trafficking disruption, and nascent evidence for synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration-linked proteostatic defects. Extrapolation to human health risk remains constrained by the frequent use of high-dose exposure paradigms, limited validated data on internal dosimetry in the human brain, discrepancies between effective concentrations in experimental models and environmentally relevant human tissue burdens, and insufficient causal validation of distal adverse outcomes. We highlight key research priorities including aged mixed-particle exposure systems, leachate-controlled assays, quantitative internal dose evaluation, and mechanistic intervention verification. This evidence-stratified AOP framework resolves longstanding mechanistic ambiguities in particulate neurotoxicity, providing a standardized, causality-based foundation for future mechanistic exploration and health risk assessment of global plastic pollution.

Adverse outcome pathway↗

PubMed2026

Impact of a multimodal prehabilitation program on postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery. Exercise-based prehabilitation may enhance functional reserve and reduce vulnerability to perioperative cerebral insults. We hypothesized that multimodal prehabilitation reduces POCD 3 months after cardiac surgery. METHODS: This prespecified substudy of a single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03466606) included patients aged ≥50 years undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. Participants were randomized 1:1 to 4-6 weeks of multimodal prehabilitation (exercise training, nutritional support, and psychological support) or standard preoperative care. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and 3 months postoperatively using an age- and education-adjusted neuropsychological battery. POCD was defined as performance ≥1.5 standard deviations below normative values in at least 2 cognitive tests, excluding the Mini-Mental State Examination. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with POCD. RESULTS: Of 160 participants screened from the parent trial, 134 met eligibility criteria for the substudy and were randomized; 116 completed 3-month follow-up (prehabilitation n = 53; control n = 63). POCD occurred in 29 patients (25%), including 15/53 (28%) in the prehabilitation group and 14/63 (22%) in controls (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-3.50, P = 0.52). In multivariable analysis, preoperative cognitive impairment was independently associated with POCD (OR 13.28, 95% CI 4.06-43.41, P < 0.001), whereas prehabilitation was not (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.35-3.45, P = 0.877). Higher physical activity levels at 3 months were associated with lower odds of POCD (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, a 4-6-week multimodal prehabilitation program did not reduce postoperative cognitive dysfunction 3 months after cardiac surgery. Although the intervention did not achieve measurable cognitive protection, the observed association between postoperative physical activity levels and postoperative cognitive dysfunction warrants further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A multi-center, open-labelled, randomized controlled extended phase III non-inferiority clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and tolerability of poliomyelitis vaccine (Vero cells), inactivated, Sabin strains administered with or without routine infant vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has been reported to cause vaccine-derived poliovirus and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis, and the limited global supply of conventional IPV has led many countries to rely on fractional-dose IPV regimens alongside OPV. The current study aims to assess the sIPV safety and immunogenicity when given concurrently with or in a staggered manner with routine immunization. METHODS: A multi-country, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled, extended phase III non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted with 1442 healthy infants aged 6-8 weeks from Bangladesh and Pakistan enrolled and randomized into four groups, i.e., co-administration group 1 (group C1), co-administration group 2 (group C2), staggered administration group 1 (group S1) and staggered administration group 2 (group S2). Antibody levels were determined using the collected sera for immunogenicity evaluation. The difference in seroconversion rates between the coadministration group and the staggered administration group is compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ2 (CMH-χ2) test, stratified by study site. Non-inferiority is concluded if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the rate difference (coadministration group minus staggered administration group) is greater than -10%. The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05850364), and the protocol and statistical analysis plan are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05850364. The trial is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: The post-vaccination seroconversion rates for PV I were 90.3% (306/339) in group C1 and 87.0% (261/300) in group S1, for PV II, 91.7% (311/339) in group C1 and 91.3% (274/300) in group S1 and for PV III, 86.4% (293/339) in group C1 and 92.3% (277/300) in group S1. Among adverse reactions (ARs) reported within 7 days of vaccination, the incidence was similarly high in both the co-administration and staggered vaccination groups (92.8% vs. 95.5%). INTERPRETATION: Our results demonstrated favorable safety and immunogenicity of co-administration of sIPV with other routine infant vaccines according to a 3-dose primary immunization schedule.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of comprehensive oral care on nasogastric tube removal in long-term care residents with dysphagia: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Oral care is essential for residents in long-term care (LTC) facilities to reduce complications such as aspiration pneumonia. While routine oral hygiene is standard practice, comprehensive oral care (COC)-which includes facial and intraoral muscle massage, salivary gland stimulation, and oral moisturization-may further enhance swallowing function. However, evidence linking COC directly to nasogastric (NG) tube removal remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of COC in facilitating NG tube removal and improving swallowing function among LTC residents with dysphagia. A multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted across eight LTC facilities. The intervention group (n = 40) received daily one-on-one COC sessions lasting 30-40 min, while the control group (n = 37) received routine oral hygiene. Participants were followed for six months, with outcomes including NG tube removal, swallowing function, body weight, and pneumonia incidence. At six months, the COC group demonstrated a significantly higher NG tube removal rate, with eight participants achieving full oral intake (p = 0.005). Functional Oral Intake Scale scores were also significantly higher in the intervention group (p = 0.005). Time to NG tube removal ranged from 17 to 182 days. Under intention-to-treat principles, the NG tube removal rate remained significantly higher in the COC group (16.7%vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Competing risks analysis using the Aalen-Johansen estimator confirmed a 6-month cumulative incidence of NG tube removal of 14.6% in the COC group versus 0% in the control group (Gray's test: p = 0.005), with no significant between-group difference in mortality (p = 0.500). No significant differences were observed in body weight change or pneumonia incidence between groups. Among participants who successfully discontinued NG tube use, dementia was the most common underlying condition. These findings suggest that daily one-on-one COC is a feasible intervention in LTC settings and may improve swallowing function while facilitating NG tube removal in residents with dysphagia.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Integration of Clinical Case Scenarios With Anatomical Dissection Teaching-Is Recall Improved Among Medical Students?

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate about how best to deliver anatomy teaching in a modern medical curriculum. Some studies suggest that the separation of basic sciences and clinical teaching can impact students' confidence in anatomy, which has potential long-term implications on their medical career. This suggests new pedagogic approaches to improve anatomy teaching may be beneficial. This study aimed to establish if integrating a clinical case into anatomy practical classes would improve students' anatomy recall compared to anatomy teaching alone. APPROACH: A ten minute clinical scenario was developed, which focused on the typical history, examination, investigations and management of a hip fracture patient. Medical students (n = 220) currently studying lower limb anatomy were randomised by pre-assigned anatomy groups to become intervention or control. In the intervention group, students received the clinical case teaching, followed by their anatomy session. In the control group, students attended the anatomy session. Students in both groups were then assessed on hip anatomy. The intervention group also gave their perception of the clinical case. EVALUATION: This study showed that participants who received integrated teaching performed significantly better in the anatomy recall test (3.64 SD ± 0.574) than whose who had anatomy teaching only (1.95 SD ± 0.994) (chi2 = 185.51, p < 0.00001). Most participants (93.5%; 101/108) strongly agreed/agreed that integrating clinical cases into anatomy teaching benefited their learning. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that students' anatomy recall may be improved by integrating clinical cases and anatomy teaching. It also suggests that students found this approach beneficial for their learning.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Associations of clinical and laboratory parameters with pediatric urolithiasis composition: A retrospective, single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors associated with distinct stone compositions in children. METHODS: This retrospective study included 237 children aged <14 years who underwent stone composition analysis between July 2008 and November 2023. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: The urate component (uric acid anhydrous, ammonium acid urate, and sodium urate) was most prevalent in infants, males, and non-Han children, whereas the calcium oxalate component predominated in older children. Analysis of coexisting components revealed urate is the most common partner to calcium oxalate (67.6%), and vice versa (82.8%). Struvite most frequently coexisted with carbonate apatite (60%), while carbonate apatite most often coexisted with calcium oxalate (54%). After PSM, the urate component was independently associated with host metabolic dysregulation, including lower high-density lipoprotein (β = -0.175, 95% CI: -0.279 to -0.071, p = 0.001) and with coagulation dysfunction, as evidenced by a prolonged prothrombin time (β = 0.595, 95% CI: 0.125 to 1.064, p = 0.014). Additionally, preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and congenital urinary tract anomalies were independently associated with both carbonate apatite and struvite components, with directionally consistent but quantitatively unstable signals in the struvite cohort, whereas the calcium oxalate component exhibited an inverse association with UTI (OR = 0.156, 95% CI: 0.030 to 0.819, p = 0.028). Furthermore, the carbonate apatite component was also independently associated with an elevated systemic immune-inflammation index (β = 416.53, 95% CI: 60.05 to 773.01, p = 0.024) and systemic inflammation response index (β = 1.286, 95% CI: 0.086 to 2.487, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Urate component was prevalent in infants, males, and non-Han children, whereas calcium oxalate predominated in older children. After adjusting for confounders, urate composition was associated with metabolic abnormalities, the carbonate apatite component was linked to infection and anatomical malformations, and a similar directional pattern was observed in the struvite cohort.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The influence of organizational culture on medication safety practices and associated risk factors in the community setting: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Increasing attention has been given to the role of organizational culture in influencing medication safety practices across healthcare settings. The lack of widely accepted standardized instrumentation makes operational measurement of organizational culture and medication safety challenging. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the impact of organizational culture on medication safety within community healthcare settings. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Nursing & Allied Health were searched in August 2025 using keywords, subject terms, field codes, and Boolean operators to identify papers relevant to the review question; bibliographies of included studies were also reviewed. Screening and full-text review were completed independently by two reviewers with a third to adjudicate conflicts. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used for quality assessment. The PRISMA statement guided the development and implementation of the review. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included representing various community settings. Most studies reported on untoward medication events, but few measured systematically collected safety data before and after an intervention. Organizational culture was seldom defined or operationalized. Most studies were methodologically sound, but the overall level of evidence was weak to moderate. CONCLUSION: Organizational culture influences medication safety through aspects such as communication channels, teamwork, training, and an environment that allows error and near-miss reporting. Few studies explicitly evaluate the causal impact of culture interventions on measurable medication safety outcomes in community healthcare settings. Further research should incorporate standardized measurement tools and intervention-based, pre-post designs to better understand how organizational culture influences medication safety in community healthcare settings.

Organizational Culture↗

PubMed2026

Insights from expert panels on the EU clinical evaluation consultation procedure.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Evaluation Consultation Procedure (CECP) under the EU Medical Device Regulation aims to strengthen and harmonize the assessment of high-risk medical devices. This review summarizes early insights from expert panels to support improved clinical evaluation practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This review analyses 34 expert panel opinions derived from 281 CECP submissions between April 2021 and December 2025. Statements from opinions were systematically extracted, de-duplicated, and grouped into thematic categories, with independent review and validation. The analysis focuses on common challenges found during the consultation procedure of the expert panels on the content of the clinical assessment in relation to clinical evidence, benefit-risk assessment, intended purpose alignment, and post-market clinical follow-up planning. RESULTS: Expert panel findings highlight recurrent issues in the sufficiency, consistency, and transparency of clinical evidence, underscoring the need for improved standardization and clearer guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening documentation quality and alignment across stakeholders will enhance the robustness, efficiency, and predictability of conformity assessments for high-risk medical devices.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Review of regulatory requirements for benefit-risk assessment for medical devices: uncovering existing methodologies.

INTRODUCTION: A positive benefit-risk profile is a prerequisite for the market approval of medical devices. However, regulations are often criticized for providing limited information on benefit-risk assessment (BRA) despite growing expectations for quantitative methods. A clearer understanding of regulatory requirements, existing methodologies, and unresolved issues is needed. AREAS COVERED: Relevant regulatory documents referencing BRA for medical devices were systematically identified, with a primary focus on the European regulation followed by screening to extract BRA‑related requirements and any explicitly or implicitly described methods. The findings were analyzed and consolidated by BRA context, type, objective, methodological description, and implementation, thereby establishing a basis for the BRA methodological landscape. EXPERT OPINION: BRA is not a single concept, but a set of context‑dependent assessments across lifecycle of a medical device. BRA within clinical evaluation framed into BRAs of risk management holds a pivotal role and is supported by the most detailed methodological guidance, although BRAs in other contexts are important. A structured overview of existing BRA requirements clarifies their treatment across regulatory documents. By differentiating BRA contexts, types, objectives, and required methodological detail, the analysis supports a more transparent understanding of BRA and helps identify priorities for methodological refinement and interface clarification.

Risk Assessment↗

PubMed2026

Game-Based Intervention for Bullying: Assessing the Efficacy of the REThink Therapeutic Game in Primary School Children.

Children's mental health issues can have a lasting effect into adulthood, including enhanced risks for their social and emotional development, as well as their academic performance and overall behavior. Worldwide nearly 1 billion children are affected by the bullying phenomenon, with social, emotional, and economic consequences. In this vein, our study aimed to analyze the effect of the therapeutic game REThink on the improvement of emotion regulation abilities and the reduction of both bullying behavior and victimization in primary school children. Our sample consisted of 75 children who were voluntarily enrolled by their parents, and randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 38) or to the control group (n = 37). They completed the baseline assessment consisting of emotion regulation, irrationality, bullying and victimization behavior measurements, then the children from the intervention group played the therapeutic game REThink. Four weeks later, after completing each level twice, every participant had completed the same questionnaires at the post-test assessment. The results indicated significant changes across victimization for children who were exposed to verbal, physical or social bullying, increased emotional control and lower levels of irrationality, low frustration tolerance to work and demandingness, with small to medium effect size improvements for the REThink game group compared to the control group. The REThink therapeutic game proved to be a promising intervention tool for reducing victimization effects and irrationality, and improving emotion regulation abilities in primary school children. Future research could improve on these results by addressing the timeline stability limit.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Educational interventions to improve medical students' bad news communication skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to both determine whether educational interventions improve medical students' ability and/or confidence in Bad News Communication (BNC), as well as assess the relative efficacy of instructional formats. METHODS: Performed according to the PRISMA guidelines, four databases were searched for articles describing education-based interventions to improve medical student's BNC ability and/or confidence, published in English between 2001 and 2024. Data on students' self-reported or observer-assessed level of competence/ability in BNC (primary outcome), and students' self-assessed confidence in BNC skills (secondary outcomes), were analysed. Meta regression explained the influence of several categorical moderators on heterogeneity in relation to intervention effects on competence/ability. RESULTS: 27 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review and 17 studies for the meta-analysis. Interventions described in controlled studies were associated with a moderate and significant increase in BNC ability (13 data sets; standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.52 - 1.66). Interventions detailed in pre-post design studies were associated with a significant increase in BNC ability (20 data sets; SMD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.52 - 1.32), and student confidence/comfort in their BNC skills (12 data sets; SMD = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.57 - 1.75). Subgroup analysis demonstrated better skills/competence outcomes in studies that included simulation-based training (SBT). CONCLUSIONS: Educational interventions improve the BNC ability and confidence of medical students. Interventions should include an SBT element as this leads to greater improvements in BNC ability. Further research is needed to determine to what extent these interventions translate to positive patient outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Diverse educational programme, especially those including simulation-based training, are effective in improving BNC skills, although the longetivity of these improvements is at present unclear. Therefore, we recommend that refresher courses or practice opportunities should be scheduled throughout students' medical education to ensure retention of BNC skills.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

An impact assessment of the European medical device regulations implementation - the current status quo.

BACKGROUND: This research aims to assess the current impact of the medical and in-vitro diagnostic devices regulations (MDR/IVDR) on the device industry in the EU, under the lens of postimplementation and the amending regulation, and in advance of the final transition to the IVDR/MDR in the future. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A quantitative survey was administered to a diverse cohort of medical device enterprises, ranging from micro to large organizations. RESULTS: The survey indicates that the MDR/IVDR has harmed innovation, leading many manufacturers to seek initial device approval and launch elsewhere before in Europe. There is evidence that some manufacturers have rationalized their existing product portfolios and removed devices from the market as they stated they would in previous industry surveys. The MDR/IVDR has been shown to negatively impact manufacturers, with increased costs related to notified body (NB) fees, maintaining and updating documentation, recertification fees, and hiring additional staff. CONCLUSION: This study provides a current status of the effects of MDR/IVDR on manufacturers and finds that despite amending regulations and other interventions taken by the EU to mitigate regulatory burden, ensure product availability, and address stakeholder concerns, the EU is no longer the market of choice for new products.

Equipment and Supplies↗

PubMed2026

Medically Unexplained Symptoms: A Systematic Umbrella Review of Current Terminology and Reported Rationales.

OBJECTIVES: Toaddress current naming conventions for Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) through a systematic umbrella review. The terminology used and the provided rationales were considered. METHODS: Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024526020), this review searched 8 key databases, last on January 28, 2025. Reviews including medically unexplained symptoms (or synonym or subtype) in their systematic search terms were included (N=422). RESULTS: A total of 577 references to 111 terms were made across the reviews, with numerous reviews using the same overarching terms, including "functional" (n=233), "somatic" (or variants thereof, n=51), and "medically unexplained" (n=28). Thirty percent of terms (n=179) were to specific syndromes or terms that did not group together under an overarching term, suggesting substantial variability in terms, even though over 60% of authors were primarily associated with just 3 disciplines: medicine, allied health, and psychology. A subset of 23 reviews provided rationales, which were subjected to content analysis and a ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) risk-of-bias assessment. This analysis showed that rationales tended to (1) highlight differences between psychological, psychiatric, and other medical fields (n=7); (2) focus on the patient perspective and patient-practitioner therapeutic relationship (n=10); or (3) follow broad and/or commonly used terms (n=7). DISCUSSION: The current landscape of terminology used for MUS remains varied, nuanced, and inconsistent between disciplines. Moving forward to a more universal language accepted and used by both patients and practitioners would aid in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of MUS.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Factors influencing the enhancement of the new iron triangle in healthcare organisations.

PURPOSE: A new paradigm, "healthcare's new iron triangle," has been developed to emphasise the technological perspective of healthcare delivery, focusing on automation, value and empathy. The study aims to build a conceptual model and to identify factors for the enhancement of the new iron triangle in healthcare organisations. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The healthcare organisation is the primary focus point of the current study. To determine the factors, a survey of the literature and healthcare experts' opinions was conducted. The healthcare professionals validated the identified factors. Data for this study were gathered using a closed-ended questionnaire and scheduled interviews. The study employed "Total Interpretive Structural Modeling methodology and Matriced' Impacts Croise´s Multiplication Appliqué´ a UN Classement/Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to a Classification (MICMAC) analysis" to address the "why" and "how" the factors interact and prioritise the identified factors. FINDINGS: The study found that organisational structure (F8), artificial intelligence (F1), innovation (F2) and human resources (F5) are the driving or key factors of the study. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The study primarily focused on identifying factors for the enhancement of a new iron triangle in healthcare organisations. The scope could eventually be expanded to explore more areas. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Academics and other stakeholders will have a better understanding of the key drivers for the enhancement of the new iron triangle in healthcare organisations. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: In this study, total interpretive structural modeling and cross-impact MICMAC analysis are proposed as an innovative approach to address the new iron triangle in healthcare organisations.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Premature closure underlies bias in medical diagnosis in students: A randomised controlled experiment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study reported in this article was to shed light on the cognitive mechanism mediating between biasing information and diagnostic error. The literature suggests at least two different hypotheses: premature closure leading biased participants to spend less time on diagnosis or increased competition between diagnostic hypotheses. The latter hypothesis predicts that biased participants would spend more time reaching a diagnosis. METHOD: Using the salient distracting findings (SDF) experimental paradigm, we biased 58 fourth-year medical students while diagnosing 12 clinical vignettes in a within-group incomplete block design under three conditions: cases presented without SDF, with SDF at the beginning and with SDF at the end. For each of these conditions, diagnostic accuracy, the number of SDF-related mistakes and time per word needed to process the case were recorded. The data were analysed using linear mixed modelling. Estimated marginal mean scores were reported. RESULTS: Participants confronted with salient distracting features (SDFs) at the beginning of a clinical case demonstrated significantly lower diagnostic accuracy (mean 0.11) compared with the No-SDF condition (0.27), representing a 61% reduction (F2,693 = 11.995, p < 0.001), and made more SDF-related mistakes (F2, 693 = 16.395, p < 0.001). When SDFs were presented at the end of the case, diagnostic accuracy was also reduced (mean 0.17; 36% reduction), but processing time did not differ from the No-SDF condition. Only early presentation of SDFs was associated with reduced processing time per word (F2,636 = 4.799, p < 0.01), consistent with premature closure. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that biasing information increases diagnostic error in medical students and that only early bias is associated with reduced information processing. The data do not support the competition hypothesis for early bias, as processing time did not increase under biasing conditions. Premature closure can therefore be directly observed rather than inferred, inviting further research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of schizophrenia with clozapine-induced tachycardia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A third of schizophrenia cases are resistant to antipsychotics, where clozapine is the only FDA-approved medication. Clozapine use is often limited by intolerable adverse effects. Persistent tachycardia occurs in approximately 25-54% patients receiving clozapine. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive, clinically relevant marker of autonomic nervous system functioning. Atenolol and Ivabradine are usually prescribed for clozapine-induced tachycardia (CIT), although evidence guiding their optimal use remains limited. AIM: This study aimed to compare the effects of atenolol versus ivabradine on HRV in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) receiving clozapine. METHODS: This open-label randomised clinical trial, conducted at a tertiary-care center over 20 months, involved TRS patients on clozapine for more than three months and having persistent tachycardia. Twenty patients received atenolol 25mg once-daily, while twenty received ivabradine 5mg twice-daily for two months. The primary outcome was the change in the frequency domain of HRV, while the secondary outcomes were time-domains, central and peripheral blood pressure, pulse rate and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). RESULTS: While both drugs significantly reduced pulse-rates (atenolol: -20.56±13.00, p<0.001; ivabradine: -21.855±12.873, p<0.001). Within-group analysis showed that, the atenolol group had significant improvements in high-frequency [HF] power (p=0.048) and LF/HF ratio (p=0.044), along with a non-significant trend towards increased total power (p=0.053); no significant within-group changes were observed in the ivabradine group. CONCLUSION: No significant between-group differences in HRV parameters were established between atenolol and ivabradine. Ivabradine could be a viable option in patients where atenolol is either contraindicated or not tolerated. Future larger multicentric studies are needed for greater generalisability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06505668.

Humans↗