Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ANESTHESIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Comparative study between topical anesthesia and sub-Tenon's capsule anesthesia for cataract surgery].

AIM OF THE STUDY: We performed a prospective study to compare two techniques of local anesthesia: topical and subtenon anesthesia. Twenty-five patients underwent cataract surgery on both eyes by phakoemulsification and insertion of foldable lenses in the capsular bag. The second eye was operated 24 hours after the first one. We evaluated patient confort, surgeon confort, surgical complications and pupillary diameter evolution during the procedure. RESULTS: 64% of patients preferred subtenon anesthesia procedure. Surgeon confort was better with subtenon anesthesia. No surgical complications occurred in either group. The pupillar diameter evolution was different, decreasing for about 25% for topical anesthesia and 15% for subtenon anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Subtenon anesthesia is more comfortable for the patient: deeper anesthesia, reliable, longer lasting; light tolerance is better. It is also more comfortable for the surgeon: better pupillar dilatation during the procedure. Topical anesthesia has inconstant efficiency.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Selective spinal anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy. V: pharmacoeconomic comparison vs general anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To compare the cost and effectiveness of small-dose spinal anesthesia (SP) with general anesthesia (GA) for outpatient laparoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective record analysis of 24 patients who received SP were compared with 28 patients who received GA in our Daycare centre. The costs of anesthesia and recovery were calculated, from an institutional perspective, using 1997 Canadian Dollar values. Effectiveness was measured in terms of time for anesthesia and recovery, and postoperative antiemetic and analgesic requirements. RESULTS: Both groups were well matched for age, weight, duration and type of surgery. The mean total cost for the SP group of $53.45 +/- 10.40 was no different from that for the GA group of $48.92 +/- 10.25 (95% CI -10.3, 1.2). Time to administer anesthesia was longer in the SP group with a mean time of 18 +/- 8 min compared with 10 +/- 3 min in the GA group (CI -11.3, -4.7). Recovery time in the PACU was longer in the SP group 123 +/- 51 min compared with 94 +/- 48 min (CI -56.6,-1.4). Postoperative antiemetic requirements were similar: 8% in SP group vs 14% in GA group, whereas analgesic requirements were less in the SP group with 25% receiving analgesia compared with 75% in the GA group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The total cost of anesthesia and recovery using SP is similar to that for GA when used for outpatient laparoscopy. Spinal anesthesia was less effective than GA in time to administer anesthesia and in duration of recovery. Postoperative analgesic requirements were reduced using SP.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia: the preferred anesthetic technique for thoracic surgery.

UNLABELLED: Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) combined with general anesthesia (GA) as well as total-IV anesthesia (TIVA) are both established anesthetic managements for thoracic surgery. We compared them with respect to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, shunt fraction and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Fifty patients, ASA physical status II-III undergoing pulmonary resection were randomly allocated to two groups. In the TIVA group, anesthesia was maintained with propofol and fentanyl. In the TEA group, anesthesia was maintained with TEA (bupivacaine 0.5%) combined with low-dose concentration 0.3-0.5 vol% of isoflurane (end-tidal). Changing from two-lung ventilation to one-lung ventilation caused a significant increase in cardiac output (CO) in the TIVA group, whereas no change was observed in the TEA group. One-lung ventilation caused significant increases in shunt fraction in both groups which was associated per definition with a significant decrease in PaO(2) in both groups but PaO(2) remained significantly increased in the TEA group (P < 0.05). We conclude that both anesthetic regimens are safe intraoperatively. However, TEA in combination with GA did not impair arterial oxygenation to the same extent as TIVA, which might be a result of the changes in CO. Therefore, patients with preexisting cardiopulmonary disease and impaired oxygenation before one-lung ventilation might benefit from TEA combined with GA. IMPLICATIONS: Fifty patients underwent lung surgery through the opened chest wall requiring ventilation of only one lung. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either general anesthesia alone or in combination with regional anesthesia via a catheter in the back. Oxygen content in the blood and blood pressure was better maintained in the group receiving the combination of general with regional anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Closed-loop control of anesthesia using Bispectral index: performance assessment in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery under combined general and regional anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The Bispectral Index (BIS) is an electroencephalogram-derived measure of anesthetic depth. A closed-loop anesthesia system was built using BIS as the control variable, a proportional-integral-differential control algorithm, and a propofol target-controlled infusion system as the control actuator. Closed-loop performance was assessed in 10 adult patients. METHODS: Ten adult patients scheduled to undergo elective hip or knee surgery were enrolled. An epidural cannula was inserted, and 0.5% bupivacaine was used to provide anesthesia to T8 before general anesthesia was induced using the propofol target-controlled infusion system under manual control. After the start of surgery, when anesthesia was clinically adequate, automatic control of anesthesia was commenced using the BIS as the control variable. Adequacy of anesthesia during closed-loop control was assessed clinically and by calculating the median performance error, the median absolute performance error, and the mean offset of the control variable. RESULTS: The median performance error and the median absolute performance error were 2.2 and 8.0%, respectively. Mean offset of the BIS from the set point was 0.9. Cardiovascular parameters were stable during closed-loop control. Operating conditions were adequate in all patients but one, who began moving after 45 min of stable anesthesia. No patients reported awareness or recall of intraoperative events. In three patients, there was oscillation of the measured BIS around the set point. CONCLUSIONS: The system was able to provide clinically adequate anesthesia in 9 of 10 patients. Further studies are required to determine whether control performance can be improved by alterations to the gain factors or by using an effect site-targeted, target-controlled infusion propofol system.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

For outpatient rotator cuff surgery, nerve block anesthesia provides superior same-day recovery over general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Both general and nerve block anesthesia are effective for shoulder surgery. For outpatient surgery, it is important to determine which technique provides more efficient recovery. The authors' goal was to compare nerve block with general anesthesia with respect to recovery profile and patient satisfaction after rotator cuff surgery. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 50 consenting outpatients (aged 18-70 yr) were randomly assigned to receive either fast-track general anesthesia followed by bupivacaine (0.25%) wound infiltration or interscalene brachial plexus block (0.75% ropivacaine), each under standardized protocols. Blinded recovery room nurses assessed the need for pain treatment and rated patient eligibility for bypass of the phase 1 postanesthesia care unit and for discharge home. Patients were followed up for 2 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome measures were postanesthesia care unit bypass and same-day discharge. Other same-day recovery outcomes included severity of and treatment for pain and time to ambulation. Postoperative outcomes at home included satisfaction with the anesthesia technique and absence of complications (at 2 weeks). RESULTS: Patients who received nerve block (vs. general anesthesia) bypassed the postanesthesia care unit more frequently (76 vs. 16%; P < 0.001), reported less pain, ambulated earlier, were ready for home discharge sooner (123 vs. 286 min; P < 0.001), had no unplanned hospital admissions (vs. 4 of 25 patients who underwent general anesthesia; P = 0.05), and were more satisfied with their care. No complications were reported in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve block anesthesia for outpatient rotator cuff surgery provides several same-day recovery advantages over general anesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

General anesthesia versus regional anesthesia.

No distinct advantage is apparent between regional and general anesthesia when considering perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality in peripheral vascular surgery. However, there is some evidence to support regional anesthesia over general anesthesia in an effort to optimize graft patency if the regional technique is extended into the postoperative period to provide neuraxial analgesia. An inadequate number of randomized, controlled trials have been conducted to determine whether regional or general anesthesia should be performed for carotid endarterectomy. The nonrandomized trials do support regional anesthesia by virtue of reductions in stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. A randomized, prospective trial is needed to verify these outcomes. The choice of technique does not appear to affect mortality in patients requiring hip fracture surgery, although Urwin et al. (29) reported less 1-month mortality in patients receiving regional anesthesia. General anesthesia has been associated with increased blood loss and thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing hip fracture repair. Epidural anesthesia has been shown to promote quicker return of bowel function postoperatively when the catheter has been sited at T12 or higher. Anastomotic breakdown in patients with epidural anesthesia/analgesia has rarely been reported. Most studies tend to show quicker return of bowel function when local anesthetics alone are administered epidurally.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2005

A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Both regional anesthesia and general anesthesia have been proposed to provide optimal ambulatory anesthesia. We searched MEDLINE and other databases for randomized controlled trials comparing regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in ambulatory surgery patients for meta-analysis. Only major conduction blocks were considered to be regional anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was further separated into central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block. Fifteen (1003 patients) and 7 (359 patients) trials for central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block were included in the meta-analysis. Both central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block were associated with increased induction time, reduced pain scores, and decreased need for postanesthesia care unit analgesics. However, central neuraxial block was not associated with decreased postanesthesia care unit bypass or time or reduced nausea despite reduced analgesics, and it was associated with a 35-min increase in total ambulatory surgery unit time. In contrast, peripheral nerve block was associated with decreased postanesthesia care unit need and decreased nausea but, again, not with decreased ambulatory surgery unit time. This meta-analysis indicates potential advantages for regional anesthesia, such as decreased postanesthesia care unit use, nausea, and postoperative pain. Although these factors have been proposed to reduce ambulatory surgery unit stay, neither central neuraxial block nor peripheral nerve block were associated with reduced ambulatory surgery unit time. Other factors, such as unsuitable discharge criteria and limitations of meta-analysis, may explain this discrepancy.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2001

[Recovery characteristics of propofol anesthesia in pediatric outpatients; comparison with sevoflurane anesthesia].

We compared recovery characteristics of propofol anesthesia with those of sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric outpatients. One hundred and four children, 3 months to 6 years of age, ASA physical status 1 or 2, were randomly assigned to following four groups; sevoflurane (group S), propofol (group P), sevoflurane with premedication (group MS), or propofol with premedication (group MP). Midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 and famotidine 1 mg.kg-1 were administered orally 30 min before the induction in the MS and MP group. Recovery from anesthesia, agitation, and postoperative pain were evaluated. The time intervals from the end of surgery to extubation and to discharge from the hospital were recorded. The incidence of vomiting and use of analgesic drugs were also checked. The emergence from anesthesia was slower with propofol anesthesia than with sevoflurane anesthesia, but the time to discharge from the hospital was not significantly different among the four groups. Incidence of agitation was higher in S group compared with P group, but there were no differences between MS and MP. Postoperative pain was similar among the four groups. There were no differences in the incidence of vomiting. Propofol anesthesia provided slower emergence and less agitation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗
PubMed2003

[What do patients think about anesthesia? Survey on postoperative satisfaction in ambulatory surgery comparing general and subarachnoid anesthesia].

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a telephone survey to determine the degree of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique applied during outpatient arthroscopic surgery on the knee. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recorded refusals to respond to the survey and the reasons. The patients were distributed randomly in 3 groups to receive 1) general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by continuous intravenous infusion at rates of 2 and 0.2-0.4 microgram/Kg/h, respectively; 2) subarachnoid anesthesia with lidocaine, and 3) subarachnoid anesthesia with 1.5% prilocaine. The second and third group received fixed doses of 3 mL of the local anesthetic. All patients were telephoned 48 hours after surgery and asked to answer 8 questions concerning prior experience of anesthesia, degree of satisfaction with the type of anesthesia used, postoperative pain, quality of information received about the anesthetic procedure, and undesirable side effects. RESULTS: We interviewed 120 patients and 32 refused to participate. All patients in the general anesthesia group would accept the same anesthetic technique again in future operations, whereas 85% and 82% in the lidocaine and prilocaine groups, respectively, would accept the same technique (p = 0.026). Satisfaction with anesthesia, postoperative pain, and quality of information about the anesthetic procedure was similar in all 3 groups. No important undesirable side affects were reported in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The overall satisfaction with various types of anesthesia is similar among outpatients undergoing arthroscopic surgery on the knee; therefore, patient preferences for one technique over another should be taken into more consideration.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Combined local block anesthesia and general anesthesia in cleft lip repairing operation of infants].

OBJECTIVE: Summarizing the value and key point of combined use of local block anesthesia and general anesthesia in cleft lip repairing for infants. METHODS: Local block anesthesia and general anesthesia were combined to use in 120 cleft lip repairing operation of infants using Midazolam, Fentangl, Ketamine, Scoline (or Vecuronium) in intubation, and injecting 0.5% - 1% lidocaine of which contained 1/250 000 adrenalinum. While intubation and operation, BP, P, R, SpO2, T and ECG were observed clearly. After operation, extubation was delayed and breathing oxygen was used for infants with breathing airway infection. RESULTS: While operation, anesthesia of 120 infants was smooth. After operation, the infants regain conscious quickly and no accident occurred. CONCLUSION: For the cleft lip repairing operation to infants, as combined use of local block anesthesia and general anesthesia, anesthesia is smooth, internal environment of body is steady, bleeding is little, regaining consciousness is quick and the infants are safe.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2003

The observation of response to cardiovascular system at periextubation period after continuous epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia.

The observation of cardiovascular response at peri-extubation period after continuous epidural anesthesia combined with mild general anesthesia was studied. Fifty patients of carcinoma esophagus were randomly divided into two groups, general anesthesia + epidural anesthesia combined group and control group (only general anesthesia), each 25 cases in one group, using a multifunctional monitor, continuous monitoring and recording was done for ECG, systolic pressure (SP), diastolic pressure (DP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (Spo2) and rhythm of heart during the peri-extubation period. Severe cardiovascular instability was detected in control group during peri-extubation period, especially at the time of extubation, even higher than the baseline values (p<0.05). In combined group, the cardiovascular instability was far less, only a slight increase was noted at the time of extubation (p>0.05). The use of halothane was far less in combined group than that in control group (p<0.05). Mild general anesthesia combined with continuous epidural anesthesia is a good modality of anesthesia that can obviously decreased cardiovascular instability during peri-extubation.

Adult↗