Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Systematic Review”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the randomized trials, observational studies, and survey evidence on compression and pneumatic devices for thromboprophylaxis in intensive care patients. METHODS: Published studies on the use of compression and pneumatic devices in intensive care patients were assessed. A meta-analysis was conducted by using the randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A total of 21 relevant studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 13 observational studies, and 3 surveys) were found. A total of 811 patients were randomized in the 5 randomized controlled trials; 3421 patients participated in the observational studies. Trauma patients only were enrolled in 4 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies. Meta-analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials with similar populations and outcomes revealed that use of compression and pneumatic devices did not reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism. The pooled risk ratio was 2.37, indicative of favoring the control over the intervention in reducing the deep venous thrombosis; however, the 95% CI of 0.57 to 9.90 indicated no significant differences between the intervention and the control. A range of methodological issues, including bias and confounding variables, make meaningful interpretation of the observational studies difficult. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence suggests that use of compressive and pneumatic devices yields results not significantly different from results obtained with no treatment or use of low-molecular-weight heparin. Until large randomized controlled trials are conducted, the role of mechanical approaches to thromboprophylaxis for intensive care patients remains uncertain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Nocturnal GERD Symptoms and Associated Sleep Disturbances: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

GOALS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in relieving nocturnal reflux symptoms and sleep disturbances. BACKGROUND: Nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly associated with sleep disturbances. The benefits of PPI therapy for GERD-related nocturnal reflux and sleep disturbance remain unclear. STUDY: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to March 1, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with GERD and sleep disturbances that compared any PPI to placebo or an alternative therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing relief from nighttime heartburn. Secondary outcomes included relief from GERD-related sleep disturbances, changes in subjective sleep quality, work productivity, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 1495 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three placebo-controlled trials consistently showed that PPI therapy improved nighttime heartburn relief and GERD-related sleep disturbances compared with placebo. Subjective sleep quality and sleep-related daytime functioning also generally improved with PPI therapy. However, the findings were more heterogeneous across trials because of differences in study populations, comparators, and outcome measures. Across the placebo-controlled studies, TEAEs were generally similar between the PPI and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: PPI therapy was associated with improvement in nighttime heartburn and reflux-related sleep disturbances, especially in patients with reflux-driven nocturnal symptoms. The available evidence also suggests potential improvement in subjective sleep quality and sleep-related daytime functioning.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review was carried out to assess the relative efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of postoperative wound infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Trials Register and the references cited in retrieved studies were searched to identify relevant trials published between 1984 and 1995. RESULTS: Some 147 relevant trials were identified. The quality of trials has improved over the past 12 years. The results confirm that the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective for the prevention of surgical wound infection after colorectal surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical wound infections between many different regimens. However, certain regimens appear to be inadequate (e.g. metronidazole alone, doxycycline alone, piperacillin alone, oral neomycin plus erythromycin on the day before operation). A single dose administered immediately before the operation (or short-term use) is as effective as long-term postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (odds ratio 1.17 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.90-1.53)). There is no convincing evidence to suggest that the new-generation cephalosporins are more effective than first-generation cephalosporins (odds ratio 1.07 (95 per cent c.i. 0.54-2.12)). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics selected for prophylaxis in colorectal surgery should be active against both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Administration should be timed to make sure that the tissue concentration of antibiotics around the wound area is sufficiently high when bacterial contamination occurs. Guidelines should be developed locally in order to achieve a more cost-effective use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

Prediction of radiation pneumonitis by dose - volume histogram parameters in lung cancer--a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of the predictive ability of various dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters (V(dose), mean lung dose (MLD), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)) in the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) caused by external-beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Studies assessing the relationship between CT-based DVH reduction parameters and RP rate in radically treated lung cancer were eligible for the review. Synonyms for RP, lung cancer, DVH and its associated parameters (NTCP, V(20), V(30), MLD) were combined in a search strategy involving electronic databases, secondary reference searching, and consultation with experts. Individual or group data were abstracted from the various reports to calculate operating characteristics and odds ratios for the different DVH metrics. RESULTS: A total of 12 published studies and two abstracts were identified. Eleven studies assessed V(dose), seven assessed MLD, and eight assessed NTCP. Nine studies exclusively analyzed the association between various DVH metrics and RP risk. Five studies also analyzed other patient, tumor, and treatment variables in conjunction with standard DVH metrics. A direct comparison between studies and the generation of summary statistics (i.e. meta-analysis) could not be achieved due to significant predictive and outcome variable heterogeneity. Most studies did show an association between DVH parameters and RP risk. However, overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were generally poor to fair for all three classes of DVH metrics. CONCLUSIONS: An association between DVH parameters and RP risk has been demonstrated in the literature. However, the ideal DVH metric with excellent operating characteristics, either alone or in a model with other predictive variables, for RP risk prediction has not yet been identified. Several recommendations for reporting and conduct of future research into the association between DVH metrics and RP risk are provided.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2000

Single-dose ketorolac and pethidine in acute postoperative pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.

For a systematic review of postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single doses, injected or oral, of pethidine and ketorolac compared with placebo, we sought published randomized studies in moderate to severe postoperative pain. Information on summed pain intensity or pain relief outcomes over 4-6 h was extracted and converted to dichotomous information to produce the number of patients with at least 50% pain relief. This was used to calculate the relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief. Minor and major adverse effect data were extracted and summarized. For pethidine 100 mg i.m., eight randomized, controlled studies met the inclusion criteria, with 203 patients given pethidine and 161 placebo. The NNT to produce at least 50% pain relief was 2.9 (95% confidence interval 2.3-3.9). At this dose, pethidine produced significantly more drowsiness and dizziness than placebo, with numbers-needed-to-harm (NNH) of 2.9 (2.2-4.4) and 7.2 (4.8-14), respectively. For ketorolac, 14 reports met the inclusion criteria (six i.m. and eight oral). Most i.m. information (176 patients) was available for the 30 mg dose, which had an NNT of 3.4 (2.5-4.9). Most oral information was available for the 10 mg dose, which had an NNT of 2.6 (2.3-3.1). Oral ketorolac 10 mg was consistently at least as effective as ketorolac 30 mg i.m. Only with oral ketorolac 10 mg were there significantly more adverse effects than with placebo, with an NNH for any adverse effect of 7.3 (4.7-17).

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Effects of Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on peptic ulcer disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim was to systematically review the interactions between Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection and NSAID use on the risk of uncomplicated or bleeding peptic ulcer. METHODS: All relevant full articles published in MEDLINE from January 1989-June 2004 were included. Sensitivity analyses for type of controls or use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs were performed. RESULTS: In 21 studies involving 10,146 patients, uncomplicated peptic ulcer was more common in HP-positive than HP-negative patients (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.17) or in HP-positive than HP-negative NSAID users (OR, 1.81). In 6 age-matched controlled studies, ulcer was more common in HP-positive than HP-negative patients (OR, 4.03), irrespective of NSAID use, and in NSAID users than non-users (OR, 3.10), irrespective of HP status; the risk of ulcer was 17.54-fold higher in HP-positive NSAID users than HP-negative non-users. The use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs did not affect the results. Ulcer bleeding was evaluated in 17 studies involving 4084 patients. NSAID use was more frequent in bleeding patients than control subjects (OR, 5.13), irrespective of HP status and type of controls. In contrast, HP infection in bleeding patients compared with control subjects was less frequent in the 8 studies with ulcer cases as control subjects (OR, 0.40) and more frequent in the 9 studies with uninvestigated subjects as controls (OR, 2.56). In the latter studies, presence compared with the absence of both HP and NSAIDs increased the risk of bleeding 20.83-fold. CONCLUSION: HP infection and NSAID use represent independent and synergistic risk factors for uncomplicated and bleeding peptic ulcer.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2026

Influence of Concave Versus Convex Emergence Profiles on Midfacial Mucosal Stability-A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the influence of concave versus convex emergence profiles on midfacial mucosal stability in partially edentulous patients restored with implant-supported single restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251139042). An electronic search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase was performed up to May 7, 2026. Eligible studies included RCTs comparing concave (test group) and convex (control group) transmucosal prosthetic designs and reporting midfacial mucosal level changes (mm). Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (RoB 2) were performed independently. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using weighted mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: Four RCTs including 144 implants with a 12-month follow-up were included. Of these, 128 implants contributed to the quantitative synthesis, with 66 implants allocated to the concave/modified emergence profile group and 62 implants allocated to the convex/non-concave emergence profile group. The pooled analysis demonstrated a mean difference of -0.31 mm (95% CI -0.63 to 0.02; p = 0.064), indicating a trend toward greater midfacial mucosal recession with convex emergence profiles compared with concave designs. Between-study heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2 = 28%), suggesting consistent findings across studies. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the direction of the effect, with pooled estimates ranging from -0.12 to -0.43 mm. Exclusion of one study resulted in a statistically significant difference favoring concave emergence profiles (-0.43 mm; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.16; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Convex emergence profiles are associated with a tendency toward increased midfacial mucosal recession. Concave profiles are preferable to support peri-implant soft-tissue stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Emergence profile design should be considered an integral component of prosthetic and surgical planning. The use of concave transmucosal contours during provisionalization and definitive restoration may contribute to improved peri-implant soft tissue stability and enhanced esthetic outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review of the literature was performed to estimate the impact of hemiarthroplasty compared with total shoulder arthroplasty on function and range of motion in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the shoulder. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search for relevant studies published in any language from 1966 to 2004, a manual search of the proceedings from five major orthopaedic meetings from 1995 to 2003, and a review of the reference lists from potentially relevant studies. Four randomized clinical trials, with similar eligibility criteria and surgical techniques, that compared hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder were found to be eligible. Authors from three of the four studies provided original patient data. Analysis of covariance focused on the two-year outcome and included a comparison of the aggregate University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, four University of California at Los Angeles domain scores, and range of motion. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (fifty managed with hemiarthroplasty and sixty-two managed with total shoulder arthroplasty), who had a mean age of sixty-eight years, were included in this analysis. A significant moderate effect was detected in the function domain of the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score (p < 0.001) in favor of total shoulder arthroplasty (mean [and standard deviation], 8.1 +/- 0.3) compared with hemiarthroplasty (mean, 6.6 +/- 0.3). A significant difference in the pain score was found in favor of the total shoulder arthroplasty group (p < 0.0001). However, the large degree of heterogeneity (p = 0.006, I(2) = 80.2%) among the studies decreased our confidence that total shoulder arthroplasty provides a true, consistent benefit with regard to pain. There was a significant difference in the overall change in forward elevation of 13 degrees (95% confidence interval, 0.5 degrees to 26 degrees ) in favor of the total shoulder arthroplasty group (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum of two years of follow-up, total shoulder arthroplasty provided better functional outcome than hemiarthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. Since continuous degeneration of the glenoid after hemiarthroplasty or glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty may affect the eventual outcome, longer-term (five to ten-year) results are necessary to determine whether these findings remain consistent over time.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Homeopathy for depression: a systematic review of the research evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the research evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for the treatment of depression and depressive disorders. METHODS: A comprehensive search of major biomedical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Specialist complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) databases including AMED, CISCOM and Hom-Inform were also searched. Additionally, efforts were made to identify unpublished and ongoing research using relevant sources and experts in the field. Relevant research was categorised by study type and appraised according to study design. Clinical commentaries were obtained for studies reporting clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Only two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. One of these, a feasibility study, demonstrated problems with recruitment of patients in primary care. Several uncontrolled and observational studies have reported positive results including high levels of patient satisfaction but because of the lack of a control group, it is difficult to assess the extent to which any response is due to specific effects of homeopathy. Single-case reports/studies were the most frequently encountered clinical study type. We also found surveys, but no relevant qualitative research studies were located.: Adverse effects reported appear limited to 'remedy reactions' ('aggravations') including temporary worsening of symptoms, symptom shifts and reappearance of old symptoms. These remedy reactions were generally transient but in one study, aggravation of symptoms caused withdrawal of the treatment in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive search for published and unpublished studies has demonstrated that the evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy in depression is limited due to lack of clinical trials of high quality. Further research is required, and should include well-designed controlled studies with sufficient numbers of participants. Qualitative studies aimed at overcoming recruitment and other problems should precede further RCTs. Methodological options include the incorporation of preference arms or uncontrolled observational studies. The highly individualised nature of much homeopathic treatment and the specificity of response may require innovative methods of analysis of individual treatment response.

Control Groups↗
PubMed2003

Assessing the costs and consequences of laparoscopic vs. open methods of groin hernia repair: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide unbiased estimates of cost-effectiveness by systematically reviewing published cost and cost-effectiveness data derived from studies with rigorous designs that compared laparoscopic with open groin hernia repair. METHODS: Studies reporting costs and outcomes were identified as part of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open repair. The quality of the included studies was assessed against a standard checklist. Cost per recurrence avoided and cost per additional day at usual activities were estimated. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified. Laparoscopic repair was less efficient than open mesh repair in terms of avoiding recurrences, avoided but it had a modest cost per additional day back at usual activities. Laparoscopic repair is more likely to be efficient when compared with open nonmesh repair. CONCLUSION: The type of open repair with which laparoscopic repair is compared influences its cost-effectiveness. The earlier return to usual activities provided by laparoscopic repair may make it worthwhile in some circumstances.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1997

Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants with pulmonary dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the evidence to determine whether the routine use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) as compared with conventional ventilation (CV) is beneficial or harmful in preterm infants requiring mechanical ventilation for pulmonary failure principally due to respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials of elective HFOV versus CV in preterm infants <36 weeks' gestation with respiratory failure mainly attributable to respiratory distress syndrome were identified from the literature through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Oxford database of Perinatal trials, and previous reviews including cross-references and abstracts. Meta-analyses using event rate ratios (ERR), event rate difference, and if significant, number needed-to-treat were calculated (95% confidence limits were used for all analyses). Two prespecified subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: Four published trials were included. Meta-analyses revealed the following ERR (95% confidence intervals) for HFOV versus CV: mortality at 28 to 30 days, 1.02 (0.76, 1.39); chronic lung disease (CLD) at 28 days, 0.86 (0.73, 1.01); mortality or CLD, 0.9 (0.80, 1. 01); air-leak syndromes, 1.13 (0.97, 1.33); mechanical ventilation at 28 days, 1.06 (0.84, 1.33); supplemental oxygen at discharge, 0. 59 (0.37, 0.92); intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) all grades, 1.11 (0.95, 1.29); IVH (grades 3 or 4), 1.32 (1.01, 1.72); and periventricular leukomalacia, 1.39 (0.91, 2.13). In the subgroup of trials in which a high volume strategy (HVS) was used the ERR for CLD was 0.53 (0.36, 0.78); mortality or CLD, 0.56 (0.40, 0.77); supplemental oxygen at discharge, 0.57 (0.36, 0.92); IVH (all grades), 0.90 (0.61, 1.33); and IVH (grades 3 or 4), 0.84 (0.39, 1. 84). Results were similar to these for the trials using surfactant. One recent trial suggests that HFOV may reduce the cost of in-hospital care. CONCLUSIONS: The overall meta-analysis is dominated by the HIFI study, which was criticized for its methodology and surfactant was not used. Subsequent studies, most of which used HVS and/or surfactant, have shown benefits in measures of CLD without an increase in rates of IVH. Caution is warranted in interpreting these results because: 1) the treatment is not blinded and this could affect some outcomes; 2) except for one small trial postneonatal survival, lung function, and neurodevelopment have not been reported from HVS trials; and 3) the benefits and disadvantages have not been reported in infants born at different gestational ages or different birth weights. Importantly, results from groups experienced in the use of HFOV may not be readily generalizable.

Barotrauma↗
PubMed1996

Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of spinal manipulation for patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The management of low back pain remains controversial. Spinal manipulation is a widely used treatment option for low back pain. Recently issued clinical guidelines suggest that spinal manipulation may be effective for patients with acute low back pain. METHODS: A computer-aided search for published papers was conducted, and the methods of the studies identified were assessed. Scores were assigned for quality of methods (based on four main categories: study population, interventions, measurement of effect, and data presentation and analysis), the conclusion of authors regarding spinal manipulation, and the results based on the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Thirty-six randomized clinical trials comparing spinal manipulation with other treatments were identified. The highest score of a trial was 60 points (maximum score was set at 100 points), indicating that most were of poor quality. Nineteen studies (53%) showed favorable results for manipulation. In addition, five studies (14%) reported positive results in one or more subgroups only. Among the five studies with 50-60 points, three were positive, and two were positive only for a subgroup of the study population. Eleven trials compared manipulation with some placebo therapy, with inconsistent results. There appeared to be no clear relation between the methodologic score and the overall outcome of the studies. Twelve trials included patients with acute low back pain only. Of these, five reported positive results, four reported negative results, and three reported positive results in a subgroup of the study population only. There were eight trials comparing manipulation with other conservative treatment modalities, focusing on patients with subacute or chronic low back pain. Of these, five reported positive results, two reported negative results, and in one study no conclusion was presented. There were only 16 studies that included an effect measurement of at least 3 months. In only six of these do the authors report positive effects of manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of spinal manipulation for patients with acute or chronic low back pain has not been demonstrated with sound randomized clinical trials. There certainly are indications that manipulation might be effective in some subgroups of patients with low back pain. These impressions justify additional research efforts on this topic. Methodologic quality remains a critical aspect that should be dealt with in future studies.

Chiropractic↗
PubMed2006

Pulsed electromagnetic energy treatment offers no clinical benefit in reducing the pain of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The rehabilitation of knee osteoarthritis often includes electrotherapeutic modalities as well as advice and exercise. One commonly used modality is pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF). PEMF uses electro magnetically generated fields to promote tissue repair and healing rates. Its equivocal benefit over placebo treatment has been previously suggested however recently a number of randomised controlled trials have been published that have allowed a systematic review to be conducted. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 2005 was undertaken. Relevant computerised bibliographic databases were searched and papers reviewed independently by two reviewers for quality using validated criteria for assessment. The key outcomes of pain and functional disability were analysed with weighted and standardised mean differences being calculated. RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials comparing PEMF with placebo were identified. The weighted mean differences of the five papers for improvement in pain and function, were small and their 95% confidence intervals included the null. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides further evidence that PEMF has little value in the management of knee osteoarthritis. There appears to be clear evidence for the recommendation that PEMF does not significantly reduce the pain of knee osteoarthritis.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Association between bone density and fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to systematically review all published studies that investigated the association between bone density and fractures in children. DESIGN: Potentially relevant articles were identified by searching electronic databases. Duplicates were removed, abstracts were inspected, and relevant articles were obtained. Studies were included in the systematic review if participants were <16.0 years old, were healthy, had extractable data on bone mass, and had fractures as the outcome. RESULTS: Ten case-control studies were identified. No prospective studies were found. There was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies or of funnel-plot asymmetry. Eight of the studies were included in the meta-analysis, because they presented results as means and standard deviations of bone density in cases and controls. The pooled standardized mean difference for bone mass in children with and without fractures, from a fixed-effects model, was -0.32 (95% confidence interval: -0.43 to -0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for an association between bone density and fractures in children is limited. The results from this meta-analysis suggest that there is an association between low bone density and fractures in children. Although there was no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias, this meta-analysis is based on case-control studies that are prone to bias. Large, well-conducted prospective cohort studies are required to confirm the association between bone density and fractures in children.

Bone Density↗
PubMed2004

Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.

This article summarizes an extensive literature review addressing the question, How can we spread and sustain innovations in health service delivery and organization? It considers both content (defining and measuring the diffusion of innovation in organizations) and process (reviewing the literature in a systematic and reproducible way). This article discusses (1) a parsimonious and evidence-based model for considering the diffusion of innovations in health service organizations, (2) clear knowledge gaps where further research should be focused, and (3) a robust and transferable methodology for systematically reviewing health service policy and management. Both the model and the method should be tested more widely in a range of contexts.

Diffusion of Innovation↗
PubMed2005

Adverse events of herbal food supplements for body weight reduction: systematic review.

Herbal weight-loss supplements are marketed with claims of effectiveness. Our earlier systematic review identified data from double-blind, randomized controlled trials for a number of herbal supplements. The aim of this systematic review was to assess all clinical evidence of adverse events of herbal food supplements for body weight reduction for which effectiveness data from rigorous clinical trials exist. We assessed Ephedra sinica, Garcinia cambogia, Paullinia cupana, guar gum, Plantago psyllium, Ilex paraguariensis and Pausinystalia yohimbe. Literature searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, Amed and The Cochrane Library. Data were also requested from the spontaneous reporting scheme of the World Health Organization. We hand-searched relevant medical journals and our own files. There were no restrictions regarding the language of publication. The results show that adverse events including hepatic injury and death have been reported with the use of some herbal food supplements. For herbal ephedra and ephedrine-containing food supplements an increased risk of psychiatric, autonomic or gastrointestinal adverse events and heart palpitations has been reported. In conclusion, adverse events are reported for a number of herbal food supplements, which are used for reducing body weight. Although the quality of the data does not justify definitive attribution of causality in most cases, the reported risks are sufficient to shift the risk-benefit balance against the use of most of the reviewed herbal weight-loss supplements. Exceptions are Garcinia cambogia and yerba mate, which merit further investigation.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed2001

In search of truth: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to determine the effectiveness or potential harm of dental therapies. Thus, any tools able to condense reliable scientific information would be of benefit. PURPOSE: To discuss methods for the assessment of the scientific literature and, in particular, of systematic reviews for evaluating the effectiveness of oral implant rehabilitation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Various study designs and methods to identify scientific evidence are described, discussed, and ranked. Issues on how to critically appraise randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews are presented. RESULTS: Properly conducted RCTs and structured critical systematic reviews are the gold standard of clinical research for assessing whether a therapeutic intervention is effective. In the field of oral implantology, there is an urgent need to implement more RCTs and to summarize their results in systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Searching of the truth requires training and critical skill. Dentists should be trained on how to integrate their clinical experience with evidence-based research and on how to discriminate between clinically useful scientific information and less useful research.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for patients with resectable stage I and II (and some patients with stage IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but there have been no previously published systematic reviews. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted to determine whether surgical resection improves disease specific mortality in patients with stages I-IIIA NSCLC compared with non-surgical treatment, and to compare the efficacy of different surgical approaches. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included. No studies had untreated control groups. In a pooled analysis of three trials, 4 year survival was superior in patients undergoing resection with stage I-IIIA NSCLC who had complete mediastinal lymph node dissection compared with lymph node sampling (hazard ratio estimated at 0.78 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.93)). Another trial reported an increased rate of local recurrence in patients with stage I NSCLC treated with limited resection compared with lobectomy. One small study reported a survival advantage among patients with stage IIIA NSCLC treated with chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. No other trials reported significant improvements in survival after surgery compared with non-surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to draw conclusions about the efficacy of surgery for locoregional NSCLC because of the small number of participants studied and methodological weaknesses of the trials. However, current evidence suggests that complete mediastinal lymph node dissection is associated with improved survival compared with node sampling in patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC undergoing resection.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗