Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Infants' sensitivity to uniform motion.

Uniform motion across the retina is a powerful cue to the perception of self-motion. In spite of its importance for adaptive functioning, little is known about the early development of uniform motion sensitivity. Six-, 12-, and 18-week-old infants viewed random-dot kinematograms depicting leftward or rightward uniform motion. The display induced optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), which a trained observer used to judge the direction of target motion. Both speed of motion and directional coherence were varied to obtain independent motion detection thresholds. Infants of all three ages could detect uniform motion, and their detection thresholds were constant during this period of development. This is in contrast to the clear improvements in relative motion sensitivity noted previously between 6 and 18 weeks of age with a preferential looking (PL) paradigm. The developmental differences between these studies may result from: (1) separate mechanisms for detecting uniform (absolute) and differential (relative) motion; or (2) separate mechanisms underlying OKN and PL response measures.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Direction-selective adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion.

Across four experiments, this study investigated direction-specific adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by moving binocular disparity information (stereoscopic motion). The stimuli were moving arrays of stereoscopic dots created from dynamic random-element stereograms. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effects of adaptation to motion in a given direction on the apparent direction of test motion. Results showed that the direction of test motion appeared repulsed away from the direction of adapting motion (repulsion aftereffect) by as much as 20 deg or more when directions of adapt and test were similar. Experiment 3 investigated transfer of the repulsion aftereffect across the stereoscopic and luminance domains by employing stereoscopic adapting motion and luminance test motion or vice versa. Results showed that the repulsion aftereffect transferred across the two stimulus domains. Experiment 4 investigated direction-specific contrast by measuring the perceived direction of two stereoscopic arrays presented simultaneously and moving in different directions. Results showed that the directions of the arrays appeared repulsed away from one another when their directions were similar. Taken together, these results suggest that the direction of stereoscopic motion is coded in the activity of directionally selective mechanisms, as is the case for luminance-domain motion. Transfer of the repulsion aftereffect between stereoscopic and luminance domains indicates the two kinds of motion perception are mediated by a common substrate.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1996

Poor speed discrimination suggests that there is no specialized speed mechanism for cyclopean motion.

Luminance-defined and stereo-defined (cyclopean) motion share some common properties, suggesting that the two forms of motion may be detected by similar mechanisms. For luminance-defined motion there are at least two levels of processing: direction is detected and then speed is thought to be extracted by a specialized processing mechanism at a higher level. Here, we tested whether there is also a specialized speed processing mechanism for stereo-defined motion. Speed discrimination thresholds were compared for stimuli containing only stereo-defined motion, and stimuli that contained both stereo-defined and luminance-defined motion. When the stimulus contained luminance-defined motion, increment thresholds were around 0.05-0.1. For stereo-defined motion, increment thresholds were never better than 0.3. By careful analysis, it was possible to test what cues were being used to solve the speed discrimination task. Results were consistent with observers responding to distance cues rather than to speed for stereo-defined motion, suggesting that there is no specialized mechanism for processing the speed of stereo-defined motion.

Cues↗
PubMed1996

Assimilation-type and contrast-type bias of motion induced by the surround in a random-dot display: evidence for center-surround antagonism.

As a mechanism to detect differential motion, we have proposed a model of "a motion contrast detector" that has a center-surround antagonistic receptive field with respect to the direction of motion. Supporting evidence has been obtained in the studies of induced motion, motion capture, and motion aftereffect. In order to obtain further evidence in a more strictly controlled situation, we examined the perceptual bias of motion in a center stimulus induced by another, surrounding motion. By using a stochastic random-dot display configured in a center-surround concentric fashion, we measured the % signal in the center stimulus that made the stimulus perceptually stationary in the presence of a moving surround. Measurements were done for various stimulus sizes and eccentricities. The amount of bias changed as a function of stimulus size and eccentricity. At several eccentricities, smaller stimulus sizes tended to yield assimilation-type biases, whereas larger sizes tended to yield contrast-type biases. However, a spatial scaling procedure revealed that the amount of bias was a simpler function of "scaled" stimulus size that was obtained by dividing the physical size by a scaling factor at each eccentricity. In the scaled profile, assimilation-type bias changed to contrast-type bias with increasing size, reached the peak of contrast-type bias at a certain size, and decreased slightly with further increasing size. Furthermore, a model of a difference of Gaussians, DOG, function well approximated the behavior of the profile. From these results, we concluded that the process specific to perceiving relative motion is mediated by a motion contrast detector, which is possibly located in area MT.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

The effects of geometric distortion correction on motion realignment in fMRI.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Subject motion is well recognized as a significant impediment to resolution and sensitivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). A parallel confounder to fMRI data quality is geometric image distortion, particularly at high field strengths, due to susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneity. Consequently, many high-field echo-planar imaging methods incorporate a post-processing distortion correction by acquiring a field map of the sample prior to the fMRI measurement. However, field mapping methods impose a spatial mask on the data, since field information is only obtainable from regions with adequate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This masking, when applied to subsequent images in the fMRI time series, can clip the effects of motion, resulting in inaccurate estimation and correction of motion-based changes in the images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of geometric distortion correction on automated realignment (motion correction) of fMRI data are investigated from data acquired at 4 T. The results of image realignment with and without prior application of distortion correction are compared, using the estimated motion parameters and overall image realignment as metrics. RESULTS: The application of field-map-based distortion correction prior to image realignment reduces the amount of motion detected by a standard motion correction algorithm. Moreover, motion correction applied before distortion correction is shown to result in superior realignment of motion-correction images. CONCLUSION: It is preferable to perform motion realignment prior to correcting for geometric distortion.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Motion sickness susceptibility.

Motion sickness can be caused by a variety of motion environments (e.g., cars, boats, planes, tilting trains, funfair rides, space, virtual reality) and given a sufficiently provocative motion stimulus almost anyone with a functioning vestibular system can be made motion sick. Current hypotheses of the 'Why?' of motion sickness are still under investigation, the two most important being 'toxin detector' and the 'vestibular-cardiovascular reflex'. By contrast, the 'How?' of motion sickness is better understood in terms of mechanisms (e.g., 'sensory conflict' or similar) and stimulus properties (e.g., acceleration, frequency, duration, visual-vestibular time-lag). Factors governing motion sickness susceptibility may be divided broadly into two groups: (i) those related to the stimulus (motion type and provocative property of stimulus); and (ii) those related to the individual person (habituation or sensitisation, individual differences, protective behaviours, administration of anti-motion sickness drugs). The aim of this paper is to review some of the more important factors governing motion sickness susceptibility, with an emphasis on the personal rather than physical stimulus factors.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Cortical locus of coherent motion deficits in deaf poor readers.

Samar and Parasnis [Samar, V. J., & Parasnis, I. (2005). Dorsal stream deficits suggest hidden dyslexia among deaf poor readers: correlated evidence from reduced perceptual speed and elevated coherent motion detection thresholds. Brain and Cognition, 58, 300-311.] reported that correlated measures of coherent motion detection and perceptual speed predicted reading comprehension in deaf young adults. Because deficits in coherent motion detection have been associated with dyslexia in the hearing population, and because coherent motion detection is strongly dependent on extrastriate cortical area MT, these results are consistent with the claim that hidden dyslexia occurs within the deaf population and is associated with deficits in MT. However, coherent motion detection can also be influenced by subcortical deficits in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. To confirm the putative cortical locus of coherent motion perception deficits, we measured contrast thresholds for detecting the direction of movement of drifting sine wave gratings in the same participant group as [Samar, V. J., & Parasnis, I. (2005). Dorsal stream deficits suggest hidden dyslexia among deaf poor readers: correlated evidence from reduced perceptual speed and elevated coherent motion detection thresholds. Brain and Cognition, 58, 300-311.], under stimulus conditions that selectively biased for input from the subcortical magnocellular and parvocellular pathways, respectively. Contrast thresholds were not related to reading comprehension performance under either the magnocellular or parvocellular conditions. Furthermore, the previously reported correlations among reading comprehension, coherent motion thresholds, and perceptual speed remained significant even after contrast thresholds and non-verbal IQ were controlled in partial correlation analyses. In addition, coherent motion detection thresholds were found to correlate specifically with a reading-IQ discrepancy score, one commonly used indicator of dyslexia. These results provide direct psychophysical evidence that the previously reported deficit in coherent motion detection in deaf poor readers does not involve subcortical pathway deficits, but rather is associated with a cortical deficit likely involving area MT. They also strengthen the argument for the existence of hidden dyslexia in the deaf adult population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Decreasing motion artifacts in calcium-dependent fluorescence transients from the perfused mouse heart using frequency filtering.

A strategy has been developed for the removal of motion artifact and noise in calcium-dependent fluorescence transients from the perfused mouse heart using frequency filtering. An analytical model indicates that the spectral removal of motion artifacts is independent of the phase shift of the motion waveform in the frequency domain, and thus to the time shift (or delay) of motion in the time domain. This is based on the "shift theorem" of Fourier analysis, which avoids erroneous correction of motion artifact when using the motion signal obtained using reflectance from the heart. Several major steps are adopted to implement this model for elimination of motion as well as detection noise from the fluorescence transient signals from the calcium-sensitive probe Rhod-2. These include (1) extracting the fluorescence calcium transient signal from the raw data by using power spectrum density (PSD) in the frequency domain by subtracting the motion recorded using the reflectance of excitation light, (2) digitally filtering out the random noise using multiple bandpass filters centralized at harmonic frequencies of the transients, and (3) extracting high frequency noise with a Gaussian Kernel filter method. The processed signal of transients acquired with excessive motion artifact is comparable to transients acquired with minimal motion obtained by immobilizing the heart against the detection window, demonstrating the usefulness of this technique.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection.

After several decades of unimodal perceptual research, interest is turning increasingly to cross-modal interactions. At a physiological level, the existence of bimodal cells is well documented and it is known that correlated audiovisual input enhances localisation and orienting behaviours. Audiovisual perceptual interactions have also been demonstrated (e.g., the well-known McGurk effect). The present study explores motion perception and asks whether correlated audiovisual motion signals would be better detected than unimodal motions or bimodal motions in opposing directions. Using a dynamic random-dot field with variable motion coherence as a visual stimulus, together with an auditory motion defined by a stereo noise source smoothly translating along a horizontal trajectory, we find that correlated bimodal motion yields only a slight improvement (approximately a square root of two advantage) in detection threshold relative to unimodal detection. The size of this benefit is consistent with a statistical advantage rather than a bimodal facilitation account. Moreover, anticorrelated bimodal motion showed the same modest improvement, again speaking against linear summation but consistent with statistical combination of visual and auditory signals. These findings were replicated in peripheral as well as in central vision, and with translating visual objects as well as with spatially distributed visual motion. The superadditivity observed neurally (especially in deep-layer superior collicular cells), when weak unimodal signals are combined in bimodal cells does not apply to the detection of linear translational motion.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2004

Human MT+ mediates perceptual filling-in during apparent motion.

During apparent motion, spatially distinct items presented in alternation cause the perception of a visual stimulus smoothly traversing the intervening space where no physical stimulus exists. We used fMRI to determine whether the perceptual 'filling-in' that underlies this phenomenon has an early or late cortical locus. Subjects viewed a display comprised of concentric rings that elicited apparent motion (two concentric rings presented in alternation), flicker (the same rings presented simultaneously), or real motion. We independently localized the cortical regions corresponding to the path of apparent motion in early visual areas (V1, V2, VP, V3, V4v, V3A), as well as the human motion processing complex (MT+). Cortical activity in the path of apparent motion in early visual areas was similar in amplitude during both apparent motion and flicker. In contrast, cortical activity in MT+ was higher in amplitude during apparent motion than during flicker, but was lower in amplitude than during real motion. In addition, we observed overlap in the cortical loci of MT+ and the lateral occipital complex (LOC), a region involved in shape and object processing. This overlap suggests that these regions could directly interact and thereby support perceived object continuity during apparent motion.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Magnocellular contributions to impaired motion processing in schizophrenia.

Patients with schizophrenia show impairments in motion processing, along with deficits in lower level processing primarily involving the magnocellular visual pathway. The present study investigates potential magnocellular contributions to impaired motion processing in schizophrenia using a combined neurophysiological and behavioral approach. As compared to prior motion studies in schizophrenia, thresholds were determined for both incoherent and coherent visual motion. In this study, velocity discrimination thresholds were measured for schizophrenia patients (n=14) and age-matched normal control subjects (n=16) using a staircase procedure. Early visual processing was evaluated using steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEP), with stimuli biased toward activation of either the magnocellular or parvocellular visual pathways through luminance contrast manipulation. Patients with schizophrenia showed poor velocity discrimination for both incoherent and coherent motion, with no significant group x task interaction. Further, when coherent motion performance was measured at individually determined incoherent motion thresholds, accuracy levels for patients were similar to controls, also indicating similarity of deficit for incoherent vs. coherent motion discrimination. Impairments in velocity discrimination correlated significantly with reduced amplitude of ssVEP elicited by magnocellular -- but not parvocellular -- selective stimuli. This study demonstrates that deficits in motion processing in schizophrenia are significantly related to reduced activation of the magnocellular visual system. Further, this study supports and extends prior reports of impaired motion processing in schizophrenia, and indicates significant bottom-up contributions to higher-order cognitive impairments.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are no published studies on the relationship between total disc replacement (TDR) motion and the development of adjacent level degeneration (ALD). Because prevention of ALD is the underlying justification for TDR, studies investigating the validity of this concept are essential. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between range of motion (ROM) and ALD 8.7 years after lumbar TDR. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective radiographic and chart review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-two patients 8.7 years after lumbar TDR. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic flexion-extension and ALD. Modified Stauffer-Coventry score. Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Subjective patient ratings of back pain, leg pain, and disability. METHODS: We reviewed the flexion-extension radiographs of 42 patients 8.7 years after TDR. Cephalad adjacent levels were evaluated for degeneration: loss of disc space height, anterior osteophyte formation, or dynamic flexion-extension instability. Graphical analysis of motion and the prevalence of ALD was performed. A statistical relationship between ALD and clinical outcome was sought. RESULTS: Ten of 42 patients evaluated (24%) had radiographic ALD. The mean motion was 3.8 degrees +/-2.0 degrees. The patients with ALD had mean motion of 1.6 degrees +/-1.3 degrees whereas the patients without ALD had motion of 4.7 degrees +/-4.5 degrees (p=.035). A clear relationship between motion and the presence of ALD at 8.7-year follow-up was observed. Patients with motion 5 degrees or greater (n=13) had a 0% prevalence of ALD. Patients with motion less than 5 degrees (n=29) had a 34% prevalence of ALD (p=.021, odds ratio 13.5). ALD had no statistically significant effect on clinical outcome although the sample size was small. CONCLUSIONS: At 8.7-year follow-up, the prevalence of ALD after TDR is higher in patients with motion less than 5 degrees. The presence of ALD had no significant effect on clinical outcome, but the sample size was small. These data suggest that patients with significant ROM after lumbar TDR may have reduced risk for radiographic ALD.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The influence of motion-defined form on the perception of spatially-defined form.

It is well established that the visual system is sensitive to the global structure--or "form"--of objects defined exclusively by spatial or motion cues, but it remains unclear how form perception combines spatial and motion cues if these are presented concurrently. In the present study, we introduce a novel class of stimuli where spatial-form and motion-form can be superimposed and manipulated independently. In both the spatial and motion domains, global structure consisted of radial-frequency (RF) contours defined by a virtual circle of Gabor elements whose positions and/or drift speeds were sinusoidally modulated at a specified frequency of polar angle. The first two experiments revealed that observers encode the global structure of spatial-RF and motion-RF contours presented in isolation. In a third experiment, observers detected a spatial-RF modulation superimposed on a motion-RF pedestal of identical radial frequency: results showed little facilitation at low pedestal amplitudes but significant masking at higher pedestal amplitudes, especially if the RF modulations of test and pedestal were in anti-phase. Additional experiments demonstrated that masking of the spatial-RF test is abolished if the global structure of the motion-RF pedestal is altered or destroyed while local motion cues are preserved. We argue these results cannot be explained by local neural interactions between spatial and motion cues and propose instead that data reflect higher-level interactions between separate visual pathways encoding spatial-form and motion-form.

Cues↗
PubMed2004

Opponent-motion mechanisms are self-normalizing.

In the ultimate stage of the Adelson-Bergen motion energy model [Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2, 284-299], motion is derived from the difference between directionally opponent energies E(L) and E(R). However, Georgeson and Scott-Samuel [Georgeson, M. A., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (1999). Motion contrast: A new metric for direction discrimination. Vision Research, 39, 4393-4402] demonstrated that motion contrast-a metric that normalizes opponent motion energy (E(L)-E(R)) by flicker energy (E(L)+E(R))-is a better descriptor of human direction discrimination. In a previous study [Rainville, S. J. M., Makous, W. L., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2002). The spatial properties of opponent-motion normalization. Vision Research, 42, 1727-1738], we used a lateral masking paradigm to show that opponent-motion normalization is selective for flicker position, orientation, and spatial-frequency. In the present study, we used a superposition masking paradigm and compared results to lateral masking data, as the two masking types activate local and remote normalization mechanisms differentially. Although selectivity for flicker orientation and spatial frequency varied across observers, bandwidths were similar across lateral and superimposed masking conditions. Additional experiments demonstrated that normalization signals are pooled over a spatial region whose aspect ratio and size are consistent with those of local motion detectors. Together, results show no evidence of remote normalization signals predicted by broadband inhibitory models [(e.g.) Heeger, D. J. (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 181-197; Foley, J. M. (1994). Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: Masking experiments require a new model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics and Image Science, 11, 1710-1719] but support a local normalization process whose spatial properties are inherited from low-level motion detectors.

Flicker Fusion↗
PubMed2005

Hierarchical integration of individual motions in locally paired-dot stimuli.

Recent psychophysical studies suggest that there are two types of motion integration processes in human visual system, i.e., the local and the global integration process. The existence of the local integration process is suggested by the vector-average perception in locally paired-dot (LPD) stimuli. Here, we investigated the relationship between the two motion integration processes by measuring the signal detection thresholds in three corresponding stimuli: (1) standard random-dot kinematograms (RDKs), (2) LPD stimuli the individual dot motions of which were identical to those of RDKs, and (3) pairwise-averaged stimuli the individual dot motions of which corresponded to the vector-averages of locally paired motions in LPD stimuli. We found that the thresholds in LPD stimuli were similar to those in pairwise-averaged stimuli rather than in RDKs. In addition, when dots were paired appropriately, observers could detect coherent motions in LPD stimuli even if the proportions of signal dots were less than the detection thresholds in corresponding RDKs. These results suggest that the local and global integrations of individual motions are carried out hierarchically, and that the global motion perception in LPD stimuli does not depend on individual dot motions directly, but depends on locally integrated motions.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed2006

Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity.

When transparent motion is defined purely by direction differences, observers fail to detect more than two signal directions simultaneously [Edwards, M., & Greenwood, J.A. (2005). The perception of motion transparency: A signal-to-noise limit. Vision Research, 45, 1877-1884]. This limit is strongly related to signal-detection thresholds for transparent motion, which are several times higher than uni-directional thresholds. When the effective signal intensities are elevated by speed differences that drive independent global-motion systems, the transparent-motion limit can be extended to allow detection of three signals [Greenwood, J.A., & Edwards, M. (2006). An extension of transparent-motion detection limit using speed-tuned global-motion systems. Vision Research, 46, 1440-1449]. Because there are independent disparity-tuned global-motion systems, distributing transparent-motion signals across distinct depth planes also allows an increase in their effective signal intensity. In the present study, the addition of depth differences enabled the simultaneous detection of three signals. However, as with the addition of speed differences, observers were not able to detect four signals, which would be predicted if signal intensity were the sole constraint on transparent-motion detection. The combination of depth and speed produced similar results, suggesting that there is a strict higher-order limit, possibly related to attention, restricting the maximum number of signals that can be detected simultaneously to three.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed2006

The infinite regress illusion reveals faulty integration of local and global motion signals.

We report a new visual illusion, where a global shape appears to continually move away from fixation, even though it remains a fixed distance from fixation. The illusion occurs because local motion signals within the object indicate motion away from fixation, and are incorrectly attributed by the visual system to the motion trajectory of the global object. A simple weighted vector summation of global and local motion signals, while a reasonable first approximation, cannot fully account for our data. We show that the faster the local motion signal, the more it biases judgments of global motion direction. We propose that local and global motion signals are summed non-linearly for this stimulus because as local motion speed increases, moving luminance blobs are visible for less time, affording less time to inhibit inappropriate component motion signals. This effect reveals the degree to which the visual system can incorrectly combine local and global motion signals belonging to a single object.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The direction aftereffect is driven by adaptation of local motion detectors.

The processing of motion information by the visual system can be decomposed into two general stages; point-by-point local motion extraction, followed by global motion extraction through the pooling of the local motion signals. The direction aftereffect (DAE) is a well known phenomenon in which prior adaptation to a unidirectional moving pattern results in an exaggerated perceived direction difference between the adapted direction and a subsequently viewed stimulus moving in a different direction. The experiments in this paper sought to identify where the adaptation underlying the DAE occurs within the motion processing hierarchy. We found that the DAE exhibits interocular transfer, thus demonstrating that the underlying adapted neural mechanisms are binocularly driven and must, therefore, reside in the visual cortex. The remaining experiments measured the speed tuning of the DAE, and used the derived function to test a number of local and global models of the phenomenon. Our data provide compelling evidence that the DAE is driven by the adaptation of motion-sensitive neurons at the local-processing stage of motion encoding. This is in contrast to earlier research showing that direction repulsion, which can be viewed as a simultaneous presentation counterpart to the DAE, is a global motion process. This leads us to conclude that the DAE and direction repulsion reflect interactions between motion-sensitive neural mechanisms at different levels of the motion-processing hierarchy.

Adaptation, Ocular↗