Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fentanyl”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

The effect of fentanyl administered epidurally by patient-controlled analgesia, continuous infusion, or a combined technique of oxyhaemoglobin saturation after abdominal surgery.

The aims of this study were to determine the effect of three different modes of epidural administration of fentanyl on oxyhaemoglobin saturation and pain control. Forty-three patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to the following groups: (1) continuous infusion of fentanyl at a rate of 50 micrograms.h-1 with additional epidural boluses (25 micrograms) as required; (2) patient-controlled analgesia using a 25 microgram epidural bolus of fentanyl with a 15 min lock-out period; (3) a combination of patient-controlled analgesia and continuous infusion. Oxyhaemoglobin saturation was measured by continuous computerised pulse oximetry for 48 h after operation together with pain and sedation scores. In the first 24 h after surgery patients in the continuous infusion group spent a significantly greater proportion of time below oxygen saturations of 94% and 85% than those in the other two groups. On day 2 all oxygen saturation measurements were worse than during day 1, but differences between groups were not significant. Those patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia required significantly less fentanyl than patients in either of the other groups (p < 0.05). However, the mean pain and sedation scores did not differ significantly between the three treatment groups. There was no association between total fentanyl dose and oxygen saturation values. Overall, self-administered fentanyl appeared to cause less oxyhaemoglobin desaturation than nurse-administered analgesia without any loss of analgesic effect.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

The effects of pethidine, fentanyl and lignocaine on postanaesthetic shivering.

Pethidine is reported to be more effective than equi-analgesic doses of other opioids as an inhibitor of postanaesthetic shivering. The aim of this study was to verify whether this action resulted from a local anaesthetic effect of pethidine or from inadequate fentanyl dosage in previous studies. We studied 52 ASA 1 or 2 patients. They were randomly allocated, in a double-blind fashion, to one of four groups to receive either pethidine (0.85 mg.kg-1) or fentanyl (1.7 micrograms.kg-1) or lignocaine (1 mg.kg-1) or 0.9% saline. All the patients were shivering and had a core temperature below 36 degrees C during recovery from non-septic abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. After 15 min, all the patients given saline were still shivering, as were 92% in the lignocaine group. In contrast, only 23% of the patients who were given fentanyl still shivered (p < 0.01 versus saline) and 8% in the pethidine group (p < 0.001 versus saline). The mean (SD) core temperature in the pethidine group was slightly lower than that in the fentanyl group (35.1 (0.6) and 35.9 (0.5)) when the patients stopped shivering. Furthermore, shivering restarted in 6/10 patients in the fentanyl group after 15 min compared with 1/12 in the pethidine group. Our results show that fentanyl (1.7 micrograms.kg-1) can inhibit postanaesthetic shivering but this effect is less pronounced and of shorter duration than with pethidine (0.85 mg.kg-1).

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Thiopentone requirements in adults after varying pre-induction doses of fentanyl.

The thiopentone dose needed for satisfactory induction of anaesthesia was determined in 60 adult patients using a double-blinded study design. No premedication was given. The effect of pretreatment with four different doses of fentanyl on ED50 for thiopentone was determined and compared with a control group not receiving fentanyl. The cardiovascular effects of the combinations were also studied. ED50 for thiopentone was reduced from 4.0 mg.kg-1 in the control group to 2.2 mg.kg-1 in patients receiving fentanyl 5.0 micrograms.kg-1. Only in the group of patients receiving fentanyl 5.0 micrograms.kg-1 was there no significant change in systolic arterial blood pressure. An increased heart rate was noted in patients induced with thiopentone in combination with fentanyl 0.625 micrograms.kg-1. No adverse effects of thiopentone, fentanyl or the combinations were noted.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed1982

Attenuation of the circulatory response to laryngoscopy and intubation by fentanyl.

The effects of fentanyl on arterial pressure and heart rate increases during laryngoscopy and intubation were studied in 45 normotensive, surgical patients, who were randomly allocated to three groups receiving 2 or 6 micrograms/kg of fentanyl or saline in a double-blind fashion before anaesthetic induction with thiopental. Fentanyl supplementation with 2 micrograms/kg significantly attenuated the arterial pressure and heart rate increases during laryngoscopy and intubation, and fentanyl, 6 micrograms/kg, completely abolished these responses. Moreover, fentanyl given during the induction decreased the amount of fentanyl needed during the operation. Respiratory depression was not observed during recovery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Ventilatory and mental effects of alfentanil and fentanyl.

Forty healthy, young volunteers received intravenously, in a double-blind and random fashion, 7.5 or 15 micrograms/kg of alfentanil, 1.5 or 3 micrograms/kg of fentanyl, or saline. The ventilatory response to CO2 was measured before and at 4, 20, 30, 50, 80, and 120 min post-treatment. Mental and psychomotor functions were measured before and at 10, 40, 100, 130, and 180 min post-treatment. Low and high-dose fentanyl caused significant respiratory depression up to 30 and 80 min post-treatment, respectively, while there was no depression with low-dose alfentanil and only at 4 min with high-dose alfentanil. The fentanyl to alfentanil potency ratio for respiratory depression was 13:1. High-dose fentanyl caused more intense and prolonged mental effects than other treatments. Neither drug affected learning or recall, although high-dose fentanyl impaired motor activity. Nausea and vomiting rates were similar between high-dose alfentanil and low-dose fentanyl.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Influence of perioperative nalbuphine and fentanyl on postoperative respiration and analgesia.

In a double-blind study the relative postoperative respiratory and analgesic effects of perioperatively administered nalbuphine and fentanyl were compared in 60 females undergoing gynecological surgery under i.v. anesthesia. One milliliter (10 mg) nalbuphine was considered equipotent to 1 ml (100 micrograms) fentanyl. In the recovery period pain was assessed by visual analog score (VAS) and recovery by Pegboard scoring. Respiratory function was evaluated by continuous monitoring of respiratory frequency and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and by frequent arterial blood gas analyses. The total volume of analgesic required for surgical analgesia was similar in the two groups. Patients in the nalbuphine group showed mild to moderate increases in pulse rate during the intubation phase and in blood pressure during surgery. Fentanyl was more effective in suppressing these cardiovascular responses. Within the first 15 min following recovery, increasing PaCO2 and ETCO2 as well as respiratory rates below 10/min were noted in 8 patients, who all belonged to the fentanyl group; in 4 of these patients i.v. naloxone had to be administered to reverse respiratory depression. Prolonged sedation was a common feature in patients receiving nalbuphine. It was concluded that fentanyl was superior to nalbuphine in attenuating the pressor responses to intubation and surgery. However, fentanyl was associated with respiratory depression in a considerable number of patients. The quality and duration of postoperative analgesia were similar in the two groups.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of two fentanyl doses to improve epidural anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine for caesarean section.

Ninety women undergoing elective caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia were double blindly randomised into three groups to receive either 2 ml of saline or 50 or 100 micrograms of fentanyl in 2 ml volume added to 0.5% bupivacaine. Both doses of fentanyl intensified the epidural anaesthesia and reduced patient discomfort during the operation. In both fentanyl groups the epidural blockade more often reached the 5th thoracic segment (P = 0.0258), the patients had significantly less pain (P = 0.0256), needed less intravenous diazepam medication during the operation (P = 0.0005) and the operating conditions were were better when compared to the saline group (P = 0.0416). There was no difference between the groups in the condition of the neonates as assessed by the Apgar score and cord blood pH. The postoperative time until treatment for pain was requested by the patients was more than 1 h longer in the fentanyl groups, but there was no difference in the total amount of postoperative analgesics needed during the first 24 h when compared to the saline group. Mild pruritus not requiring treatment was more common in fentanyl groups than in the saline group (P = 0.0187). The results suggest that 50 micrograms of fentanyl added to 0.5% bupivacaine increases patient comfort and improves the quality of epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section, and that adding 100 micrograms does not give further advantage.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Epidural fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine as adjuvants to local anaesthetics for surgical analgesia: meta-analyses of analgesia and side-effects.

BACKGROUND: The risk/benefit ratio of adding fentanyl, adrenaline and clonidine to epidural local anaesthetics for improving intraoperative analgesia is unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify this issue. METHODS: Trials retrieved by search were considered if they were prospective, controlled, epidural analgesia (without combining general anaesthesia) was planned and occurrence of pain during surgery or side-effects were reported. Papers entered meta-analysis if they reached a predefined minimum quality score. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were computed. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were included in the analysis for fentanyl. Fentanyl decreased the likelihood of pain (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.15-0.30, P < 0.001) and increased the incidence of pruritus (OR = 5.59, 95% CI = 3.12-10.05, P < 0.001) and sedation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.19-2.98, P = 0.003), compared to control (local anaesthetic without fentanyl). Fentanyl had no effect on respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and Apgar score. One case of respiratory depression of a newborn was observed. Because of the very low number of trials selected, evaluation of adrenaline and clonidine was not feasible. CONCLUSION: The analysis of current literature shows that the addition of fentanyl to local anaesthetics for intraoperative epidural analgesia is safe and advantageous. The reduction in the incidence of pain during surgery is quantitatively high and therefore clinically significant. Side-effects are mild. Randomized, controlled trials have to be performed in order to clarify the role of adrenaline and clonidine as epidural adjuvants for surgical analgesia.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2006

The effect of intrathecal fentanyl added to hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal respiratory function during Cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid blockade with local anesthetics induces respiratory depression. Although the addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine has become popular in subarachnoid blockade for Cesarean section, there is no information on the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on maternal spirometric respiratory function in parturients undergoing Cesarean section. METHODS: We tested the effect of the addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal spirometric performance in 40 consenting parturients undergoing Cesarean section. The parturients were randomized into two groups: those receiving 2.0 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.4 ml of saline intrathecally and those receiving 2.0 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.4 ml of fentanyl (20 microg) intrathecally. We performed spirometry on arriving at the operation room and 15 min after subarachnoid blockade. RESULTS: Subarachnoid blockade with bupivacaine significantly decreased the peak expiratory flow rate, but did not induce significant changes in vital capacity and forced vital capacity. The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to bupivacaine improved the quality of subarachnoid blockade, but did not lead to a deterioration in respiratory function compared with intrathecal bupivacaine alone. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine did not lead to a deterioration in maternal spirometric respiratory function in parturients undergoing Cesarean section.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the suitability and impact of adding intrathecal fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anaesthesia has been used for lower limb surgery with a stable cardiovascular state and a short recovery unit stay. We sought to test the suitability of low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a procedure hitherto performed under general anaesthesia. Furthermore, we hypothesized that adding intrathecal fentanyl to bupivacaine may improve the quality of anaesthesia. METHODS: We randomly allocated, through computer-generated randomization, 108 patients subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy to receive either 7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/ml alone or with the addition of 10 microg of fentanyl. Drugs were given at the L(2)-L(3) interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The patients remained in this position for 10 min, after which the sensory and motor blocks were assessed. Intra-operative analgesic supplementation, when deemed necessary, was achieved with intravenous fentanyl boluses (25 microg). RESULTS: The sensory and motor blocks after intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine-fentanyl were similar. Sensory block, in both groups, reached the fifth and eighth thoracic dermatomes on the operative and non-operative sides, respectively. Deep motor block occurred on the operative side in all patients and in nearly 50% of patients on the non-operative side. The patients in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group required less intra-operative and post-operative analgesics, and both patients and endoscopists were better satisfied. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated, for the first time, that intrathecal low-dose bupivacaine and fentanyl offers a reliable neuraxial block for patients subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy, with stable haemodynamics, good post-operative analgesia and acceptable patient and endoscopist satisfaction.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2005

The opioid fentanyl affects light input, electrical activity and Per gene expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nuclei.

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) contain a major circadian pacemaker, which is regulated by photic and nonphotic stimuli. Although enkephalins are present in the SCN, their role in phase regulation of the pacemaker is largely unknown. The opioid agonist fentanyl, a homologue of morphine, is an addictive drug that induces phase shifts of circadian rhythms in hamsters. We observed that these phase shifts are blocked by naloxone, which is a critical test for true opioid receptor involvement, and conclude that opioid receptors are the sole mediators of the actions of fentanyl on the circadian timing system. A strong interaction between opioids and light input was shown by the ability of fentanyl and light to completely block each other's phase shifts of behavioural activity rhythms. Neuronal ensemble recordings in vitro provide first evidence that SCN cells show direct responses to fentanyl and react with a suppression of firing rate. Moreover, we show that fentanyl induces a strong attenuation of light-induced Syrian hamster Period 1 (shPer1) gene expression during the night. During the subjective day, we found no evidence for a role of shPer1 in mediation of fentanyl-induced phase shifts. Based on the present results, however, we cannot exclude the involvement of shPer2. Our data indicate that opioids can strongly modify the photic responsiveness of the circadian pacemaker and may do so via direct effects on SCN electrical activity and regulation of Per genes. This suggests that the pathways regulating addictive behaviour and the circadian clock intersect.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1995

Combination fentanyl and diazepam for pediatric conscious sedation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and to describe the use of combination IV diazepam and fentanyl in the pediatric emergency department (PED) as outpatient conscious sedation (CS) for orthopedic procedures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a standardized protocol for CS administered to 133 consecutive patients requiring CS for outpatient orthopedic procedures. The patients were continuously monitored for heart rate, respiratory rate, and arterial O2 saturation (Sao2) by pulse oximetry. The study was conducted at a large urban PED and regional referral center. RESULTS: A total of 133 children (mean age 8.5 years) received 138 orthopedic procedures. Mean (+/- SD) total diazepam dose was 0.12 +/- 0.05 mg/kg; mean total fentanyl dose was 3.18 +/- 1.04 micrograms/kg. Mean time intervals were 4.6 minutes from initial drug administration to start of procedure, 15.5 minutes to end of procedure, and 56 minutes to meeting criteria for release home. Complications included Sao2 < 90% for 15 patients (11%, 95% CI 6.4-17.4%), vomiting for one (0.7%, 95% CI 0.1-4.2%), and severe pruritus for one (0.7%, 95% CI 0.1-4.2%). An episode of Sao2 < 90% was associated with a higher initial mean fentanyl dose (2.60 vs 1.95 micrograms/kg; p = 0.0005), but was not associated with a higher initial mean diazepam dose (p = 0.28). Parenteral opioid use for pain management prior to CS was not associated with an increased risk for Sao2 < 90% (p = 0.42). Heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure were stable during the observational period. No patient required naloxone, flumazenil, artificial airway control, or admission to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: At the doses given in the study, the use of combination diazepam and fentanyl for outpatient CS of PED patients during orthopedic procedures was not associated with serious complications. A higher initial fentanyl dose was associated with episodes of Sao2 < 90%. Therefore, an initial dose of < or = 2.0 micrograms/kg fentanyl titrated to effect is recommended.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed2003

Nebulized fentanyl for relief of abdominal pain.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacies of nebulized vs. intravenous fentanyl for the relief of abdominal pain. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-placebo-controlled study compared nebulized and intravenous fentanyl (1.5 micro g/kg). Group I received intravenous fentanyl and nebulized saline. Group II received nebulized fentanyl and intravenous saline. Pain scores were measured at baseline and at 15 and 30 minutes after the study drug, using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Thirty minutes after the study drug, the subjects were offered rescue medication. The groups were compared for changes in pain scores at 30 minutes (primary outcome, t-test), changes in pain scores at 15 minutes (t-test), and need for rescue medication (Fisher's exact test). Significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Fifty subjects (24 group I, 26 group II) were enrolled. The groups were similar with respect to mean baseline pain (72 mm group I, 74 mm group II) and demographics. A statistically significant difference in changes in pain scores at 15 minutes favoring group I (25 mm vs. 10 mm, p = 0.005) was not evident by 30 minutes (25 mm vs. 16 mm, p = 0.24). The groups were not different with respect to need for rescue medication (50% in group I compared with 69% in group II, p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized fentanyl provides comparable analgesia to that of intravenous fentanyl.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2004

Antiallodynic effects of loperamide and fentanyl against topical capsaicin-induced allodynia in unanesthetized primates.

Capsaicin produces thermal allodynia in animals and humans by acting as an agonist at vanilloid receptor subtype 1 [VR1; also known as transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1)]. VR1 receptors are widely distributed in the periphery (e.g., on primary afferent neurons). These studies examined the ability of loperamide (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.; a micro-opioid agonist that is peripherally selective after systemic administration), in preventing and reversing thermal allodynia caused by topical capsaicin (0.004 M) in rhesus monkeys, within a tail withdrawal assay (n = 4; 38 degrees C and 42 degrees C; normally non-noxious thermal stimuli). The effects of loperamide were compared with those of the centrally penetrating micro-agonist, fentanyl (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg s.c.). We also characterized the allodynic effects of the endogenous VR1 agonist ("endovanilloid"), N-oleoyldopamine (OLDA; 0.0013-0.004 M). In this model, loperamide and fentanyl produced dose-dependent prevention of capsaicin-induced allodynia, whereas only fentanyl produced robust reversal of ongoing allodynia. Antagonism experiments with naltrexone (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) or its analog, methylnaltrexone (0.32 mg/kg s.c.), which does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, suggest that the antiallodynic effects of loperamide and fentanyl were predominantly mediated by peripherally and centrally located micro-receptors, respectively. Loperamide and fentanyl (1 mg/kg and 0.032 mg/kg, respectively) also prevented OLDA (0.004 M)-induced allodynia. Up to the largest dose studied, loperamide was devoid of thermal antinociceptive effects at 48 degrees C (a noxious thermal stimulus, in the absence of capsaicin). By contrast, fentanyl (0.01-0.032 mg/kg) caused dose-dependent antinociception in this sensitive thermal antinociceptive assay (a presumed centrally mediated effect). These studies show that loperamide, acting as a peripherally selective micro-agonist after systemic administration, can prevent capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia in primates in vivo, in the absence of thermal antinociceptive effects.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2002

Use of TTS fentanyl as a single opioid for cancer pain relief: a safety and efficacy clinical trial in patients naive to mild or strong opioids.

BACKGROUND: Up to now, a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) of fentanyl has been applied to cancer patients on opioid analgesics previously treated with mild opioids or morphine. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of TTS fentanyl (patch) administration as an analgesic to patients treated with opioid analgesics for moderate-to-severe cancer pain, with immediate-release oral morphine only as rescue medication. The prior analgesic medication of the patients did not include mild or strong opioids. METHODS: The study group consisted of 113 patients (54 men and 59 women; age range: 21-87 years, mean +/- SD 61.3 +/- 14.84 years) with undertreated chronic cancer pain. The study period was 42 days. The patients were hospitalized for the first 3 days of the study; thereafter they were transferred to their home for the rest of the study. Daily cards were completed, noting their pain score (0-10 VAS), nausea, vomiting, constipation, skin reactions, dizziness or any other complaints. Vital signs were also recorded. Data assessments were made at baseline, on days 1, 2 and 3 (during hospitalization) and thereafter on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 after hospital discharge. The initial TTS fentanyl delivery rate was chosen depending on the patient's analgesic requirements. All patients were given an oral morphine solution (5-10 mg), every 4-6 h, for the first 12 h, as rescue medication. RESULTS: Baseline pain score was between 6 and 10 (mean +/- SD 7.1 +/- 1.7). The initial TTS fentanyl delivery rate was between 25 and 50 microg/h (mean +/- SD 36.5 +/- 15.7). On day 3, 95 patients (84%) reported a pain score < or = 3 (mean +/- SD 0.5 +/- 0.8), 14 patients (12.4%) a pain score of 4 and 4 patients (3.5%) of 5-8. No adverse effects suggesting the discontinuation of the study were reported. From day 7 until the completion of the study, the mean pain score was between 1.3 and 0.16 while the TTS fentanyl delivery rate on day 42 was between 25 and 400 microg/h (mean +/- SD 122.1 +/- 81.2 microg/h). CONCLUSION: Analgesic treatment with TTS fentanyl used as a single opioid is effective and safe for cancer pain relief, given that is cautiously applied, in patients requiring strong opioid analgesics even if they were naive to strong or mild opioids.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Cortisol response to surgery and postoperative confusion in depressed patients under general anesthesia with fentanyl.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between postoperative confusion and plasma cortisol response to surgery in depressed patients. We studied 80 depressed patients and 40 control patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery and perioperatively measured plasma cortisol and adrenocorticotropin levels. Postoperative confusion in the first 3 postoperative days occurred in 5 (13%) depressed patients given fentanyl during anesthesia, 13 (33%) patients without fentanyl and 1 (3%) control patients. Plasma cortisol concentration (19.7 +/- 6.9 and 19.2 +/- 8.0 microg dl(-1)) 15 min after skin incision and 60 min after the end of surgery in depressed patients with fentanyl was significantly lower than that (24.2 +/- 7.2 and 23.5 +/- 8.1 microg dl(-1)) of depressed patients without fentanyl. Plasma cortisol levels during and after surgery in depressed patients with postoperative confusion were higher than those of depressed patients without postoperative confusion. We conclude that the occurrence of postoperative confusion in depressed patients is associated with an increase in plasma cortisol levels during and after surgery. The incidence of postoperative confusion in depressed patients with fentanyl was significantly lower than that of depressed patients without fentanyl.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1997

Transdermal fentanyl for severe cancer-related pain.

A prospective phase II study was conducted to define the analgesic efficacy, acceptability and toxicity of the transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) of fentanyl in Chinese patients with severe cancer-related pain. A total of 14 patients was treated with TTS fentanyl at doses ranging from 25 to 100 micrograms h-1; initial doses were chosen according to their previous opioid requirement. Standard supportive therapy was given as required. A brief pain inventory (using a 10-point scale) was used to assess patients at days 0, 7 and 14. Pain control on day 14 with TTS fentanyl was successful in six patients, with a reduction in the common side-effects of other opioids and improvement in general well-being. Seven patients did not complete the 14-day trial: two developed dizziness and nausea within 3 h of application; and in five, TTS fentanyl was insufficiently flexible to control increasing pain during the first week. TTS fentanyl was effective and well tolerated in 43% of patients. Acute dizziness and nausea within the first few hours after application and the relative inflexibility of dose-adjustment both limited the use of TTS fentanyl.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

An audit of morphine versus fentanyl as an adjunct to ropivacaine 0.2% for high thoracic epidural analgesia.

When used as an adjunct to local anaesthetic, opioid administered via the epidural route can improve the quality of analgesia. Reports of respiratory depression associated with epidural morphine use as a sole agent in the 1980s led to an increased use of lipophilic opioids, especially fentanyl. Although fentanyl is commonly used, controversy exists about its efficacy and site of action. It is possible that low-dose morphine may be more effective than fentanyl, without increasing the risk of respiratory depression. A retrospective audit was conducted of 200 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery who received high thoracic epidural analgesia. One hundred patients who received fentanyl 2 microg/ml with 0.2% ropivacaine, prior to a change in our technique, were audited, followed by 100 patients who received 20 microg/ml morphine with 0.2% ropivacaine. Outcome measures included the incidence of Visual Analogue Score (VAS) > or =4/10; infusion rate adjustments; and side-effects. Patients receiving fentanyl were more likely to experience pain > or =4/10 (P' = 0.002); the infusion rate was higher (P' = 0.024); required more rate adjustments (P' = 0.001); a greater need for noradrenaline (P' = 0.001) and antiemetic drugs (P' = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups for sedation scores or the incidence of respiratory depression. This audit suggests morphine 20 microg/ml may be superior to fentanyl 2 microg/ml, as an adjunct to 0.2% ropivacaine. We found a reduced number of infusion interventions and less inadequate patient analgesia.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗