Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defibrillators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Reduction of energy required for defibrillation by delivering shocks in orthogonal directions in the dog.

Reduction of energy required to defibrillate (ERD) seems to represent a necessary condition for intensive development of implantable defibrillator, so as for minimization of cardiac and pulmonary damages provoked by high energy transthoracic defibrillation electric shocks. The present work describes a defibrillation method using shocks delivered in orthogonal directions and separated by a 100 ms delay. Defibrillation threshold measured with classical unidirectional shocks on 30 dogs has been found to be 286.8 +/- 22.2 joules. In the same animals, defibrillation threshold measured by use of orthogonal shocks has been found to be 101.4 +/- 14.9 joules. We conclude that this crossed shocks method leads to a substantial reduction of ERD (64%).

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Resolution of high initial epicardial patch defibrillation thresholds following chronic implantation.

To determine what effect chronic implantation of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator epicardial patch electrodes had on initial high defibrillation thresholds at implant, six patients were studied. There were five men, one woman, mean age 61 years. Three had coronary artery disease and three had dilated cardiomyopathies. Mean ejection fraction was 20%. Two patients underwent concomitant coronary artery revascularization and one underwent mitral valve replacement. No patient was on antiarrhythmic drugs. At the time of initial implant, adequate defibrillating thresholds could not be obtained in any patch configuration despite the use of up to 40 joules. Further testing was precluded in each patient due to the development of profound hypotension (less than or equal to 70 mmHg systolic) that was poorly responsive to pressors. The patch electrodes were then implanted in an arbitrary anterior-posterior position and the leads were tunneled to an abdominal pocket. After 10-15 days (mean 11), the lead ends were exposed and defibrillation testing was performed again. In all six patients, adequate defibrillation thresholds were obtained (mean 18 joules). We conclude that if adequate defibrillation thresholds cannot be obtained at implant and if further testing cannot be performed without jeopardizing the life of the patient, the patch electrodes should be implanted and retesting performed at 10-15 days.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Device interaction--antitachycardia pacemakers and defibrillators for sustained ventricular tachycardia.

We evaluated the combined use of permanent automatic antitachycardia pacemakers and implanted defibrillators in ten patients with recurrent monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Pacemaker programming was VVI-T automatic burst in eight patients, VVI-T magnet mode in one patient, and VVI in one patient. Device interactions occurred in four patients, requiring changes in pacemaker programming. These included defibrillator multiple counting during pacing, inappropriate pacemaker bursts initiating VT, inappropriate reset of the pacemaker antitachycardia mode by defibrillation, defibrillator discharge after pacemaker VT termination, and defibrillator VT reinitiation. Two patients required pacemaker programming out of the antitachycardia mode, and two required a change in antitachycardia pacing parameters. Seven patients remain in automatic VVI-T and three in VVI modes. Mean follow-up is 13 months and all patients are alive. Thus, although pacemaker/defibrillator combinations function well for patients with more than one VT rate, device interactions occur frequently and may require pacemaker reprogramming or elimination of the overdrive mode. Combined use of these devices should be cautiously considered when single device therapy is unsatisfactory. Devices that combine both pacing and defibrillation features may reduce adverse interaction.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1993

Transepicardial defibrillation dose response: current versus energy.

In pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs, we compared the relative efficacy of current versus energy in applying the dose response method in transcardiac defibrillation. Damped sinusoidal shocks via epicardial patches were administered by a custom defibrillator permitting precise current delivery. Following the establishment of an initial estimated defibrillation threshold for energy and current, the dose response method was performed with regard to either energy defibrillation threshold (group E, n = 8) or current defibrillation threshold (group C, n = 8). Two sequential sets (I, II) of shocks (21 shocks each) were delivered in random order at each of seven doses: 0.55, 0.70, 0.85, 1.00, 1.15, 1.30, and 1.45 x defibrillation threshold. Data were subjected to nonlinear logistic regression analysis. There were no significant differences between sets I and II in either groups E or C for resistance or for raw and normalized values associated with 50% and 80% success expressed as energy, current, or voltage. Correlation coefficients (r) associated with nonlinear logistic regression analysis were significantly different for normalized current and energy for group E (0.70 +/- 11 and 0.71 +/- 12) compared to group C (0.86 +/- 0.60 and 0.88 +/- 0.06). The difference, however, could be explained by a significantly narrower range of normalized current values tested in group E (0.79 to 1.31) versus group C (0.54 to 1.46). Thus, when resistance does not change, transcardiac current offers limited advantage over energy when applying a dose response method. The efficacy of nonlinear logistic regression analysis depends upon an adequate dose range.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effects of respiration phase on ventricular defibrillation threshold in a hot can electrode system.

The impedance of defibrillation pathways is an important determinant of ventricular defibrillation efficacy. The hypothesis in this study was that the respiration phase (end-inspiration versus end-expiration) may alter impedance and/or defibrillation efficacy in a "hot can" electrode system. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) parameters were evaluated at end-expiration and at end-inspiration phases in random order by a biphasic waveform in ten anesthetized pigs (body weight: 19.1 +/- 2.4 kg; heart weight: 97 +/- 10 g). Pigs were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube and ventilated through a Drager SAV respirator with tidal volume of 400-500 mL. A transvenous defibrillation lead (6 cm long, 6.5 Fr) was inserted into the right ventricular apex. A titanium can electrode (92-cm2 surface area) was placed in the left pectoral area. The right ventricular lead was the anode for the first phase and the cathode for the second phase. The DFT was determined by a "down-up down-up" protocol. Statistical analysis was performed with a Wilcoxon matched pair test. The median impedance at DFT for expiration and inspiration phases were 37.8 +/- 3.1 omega, and 39.3 +/- 3.6 omega, respectively (P = 0.02). The stored energy at DFT for expiration and inspiration phases were 5.7 +/- 1.9 J and 6.0 +/- 1.0 J, respectively (P = 0.594). Shocks delivered at end-inspiration exhibited a statistically significant increase in electrode impedance in a " hot can" electrode system. The finding that DFT energy was not significantly different at both respiration phases indicates that respiration phase does not significantly affect defibrillation energy requirements.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Defibrillation efficacy using high-frequency switching to proportion current among simultaneous shock pathways.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple-pathway electrode configurations generally allow improved current distribution over the heart and lower defibrillation thresholds than single-pathway systems. However, current distributions using multiple pathways are largely determined by electrode type and location. We hypothesized that switching the current among multiple pathways at high frequency (HF) could allow the switching duty cycle to control the proportion of time-averaged current flowing in each pathway, thus permitting altered (possibly improved) defibrillation efficacy using the same electrodes and shock waveform. METHODS AND RESULTS: In dogs, we measured the current (I50) for 50% defibrillation success using catheter electrodes in the right ventricular apex (cathode) and superior vena cava (A-pathway anode) and a subcutaneous patch on the left chest wall (B-pathway anode). In group 1 (N = 7), we measured I50s for shocks that used HF to proportion 10% to 90% of the current to the A-pathway. Shocks with 10% to 30% of the current in the A-pathway had significantly lowr I50s than nonproportioned shocks using all three electrodes. However, the resistance differed among single and simultaneous pathways so energy did not necessarily parallel these changes. In group 2 (N = 6), we measured I50s for shocks to the B-pathway alone, for nonproportioned shocks to A and B, and for shocks that proportioned 80% of the current to the B-pathway using either HF, sequential, or amplitude proportioning methods. All proportioning methods had similar I50s that were significantly lower than the I50 for nonproportioned shocks to A and B and that were comparable to shocks to the B-pathway alone. CONCLUSIONS: Shocks with most current proportioned to the B-pathway had lower defibrillation currents than nonproportioned shocks using both pathways. Thus, defibrillation efficacy was changed by HF proportioning without changing the electrodes or shock waveform. These findings suggest that HF proportioning may be a method to improve defibrillation.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation following internal atrial defibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Although the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation has been reported to be similar to that after external and internal cardioversion, little is known about immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (IRAF) following internal cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (24 men; mean age 63 +/- 13 years) underwent internal atrial defibrillation. Catheter-based defibrillation electrodes were positioned in the anterolateral right atrium and the coronary sinus. All patients were cardioverted at a mean threshold of 4.6 +/- 3.4 J. Five of 38 patients (13%) had 1 to 4 episodes of IRAF. No difference in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were observed when patients with and without IRAF were compared. Atrial fibrillation was always reinitiated by an atrial premature beat. When the earliest atrial endocardial activation time on the defibrillation catheters was analyzed, these atrial premature beats did not seem to originate from the defibrillation catheters. Twenty-one patients had atrial premature beats without IRAF. When the coupling intervals of the first atrial premature beat in patients without and with IRAF after conversion were compared, a significant difference was found (661 +/- 229 vs 418 +/- 79 msec, P < 0.05). IRAF was successfully treated with repeated shock delivery after the administration of atropine in 1 patient and intravenous flecainide in 2. Only repeated shock delivery was sufficient to treat IRAF in another 2 patients. Late recurrences of atrial fibrillation occurred in 3 of 5 with IRAF and in 19 of 33 patients without IRAF (P = NS). CONCLUSION: IRAF after internal atrial defibrillation occurred in 13% of patients, was always initiated by an atrial premature beat having a short coupling interval not originating from the defibrillation catheters, and was prevented by repeated shock delivery with or without preceding administration of pharmacologic agents. IRAF did not predict early recurrences of the arrhythmia after discharge from the hospital, emphasizing the necessity to treat immediate reinitiation promptly to achieve a successful cardioversion.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Current concepts of ventricular defibrillation.

The aim of this article is to review the current concepts of ventricular defibrillation. We studied the interaction between strong electrical stimulus and cardiac responses in both animal models and in humans. We found that a premature stimulus (S2) of appropriate strength results in figure-eight reentry in vitro by inducing propagated graded responses. The same stimulation protocol induces figure-eight reentry and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in vivo. When the S2 strength and the magnitude of graded responses increase beyond a critical level, the increase in refractoriness at the site of the stimulus becomes so long that the unidirectional block becomes bidirectional block, preventing the formation of reentry (upper limit of vulnerability [ULV]). In other studies, we found that the effects of an electrical stimulation on reentry is in part determined by the timing of the stimulus. A protective zone is present after the induction of VF and after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock during which an electrical stimulus can terminate reentry and protect the heart from VF. These results indicate that the effects of a defibrillation shock is dependent on both the strength and the timing of the shock. Timing is not important in areas where the shock field strength is > or = ULV because the shock terminates all reentry but cannot reinitiate new ones. However, in areas where shock field strength is < ULV, the effects of the shock are determined by the timing of the shock relative to local VF activations. This ULV hypothesis of defibrillation explains the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation. It also indicates that, to achieve a high probability of successful defibrillation, a shock must result in a shock field strength of > or = ULV throughout the ventricles.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.

Intramyocardial current flow is a critical factor in successful ventricular defibrillation. The main determinants of intramyocardial current flow during transthoracic countershock are the selected energy and the transthoracic impedance of the patient. To optimise the success of the first shock and to titrate energy dosage according to each patient's transthoracic impedance, a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator was developed. It was compared with a conventional energy based protocol of 200 J (delivered energy), 200 J, then 360 J if required in 42 consecutive episodes of ventricular fibrillation in 33 men and seven women. The mean (SD) predicted transthoracic impedance was 69.9 (14.0) omega. First shock success with the standard protocol was 80.9%, and first or second shock success was 95.2%. The microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator automatically measured transthoracic impedance and calculated the energy required to develop a selected current in each patient. A current protocol of 30 A, 30 A, then 40 A, if required, was used in 29 men and 12 women with 41 episodes of ventricular fibrillation. Transthoracic impedance (mean 65.1 (15.9) omega) was similar to that in the energy protocol group and success rates for first shock (82.9%) and first or second shocks (97.5%) were also similar. The mean delivered energy per shock with the current based defibrillator for first or second shock success was significantly less (144.8 J) with the energy protocol (200 J). The mean peak current of successful shocks was also significantly reduced (29.0 v 31.9 A). A current based defibrillator titrates energy according to transthoracic impedance; it has a success rate comparable to conventional defibrillators but it delivers significantly less energy and current per shock.

Cardiography, Impedance↗
PubMed2000

Resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation with use of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses for external defibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Survival after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) appears severely limited by 2 major factors: (1) low defibrillation success rates and (2) persistent post-countershock myocardial dysfunction. Biphasic (BP) waveforms may prove capable of favorably modifying these limitations. However, they have not been rigorously tested against monophasic (MP) waveforms in clinical models of external defibrillation, particularly where rescue from prolonged VF is the general rule. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 26 dogs to external countershocks with either MP or BP waveforms. Hemodynamics were assessed after shocks applied during sinus rhythm, after brief VF (>10 seconds), and after resuscitation from prolonged VF (>10 minutes). Short-term differences in percent change in left ventricular +dP/dt(max) (MP -16+/-28%, BP +9.1+/-24%; P=0.03) and left ventricular -dP/dt(max) (MP -37+/-26%, BP -18+/-20%; P=0.05) were present after rescue from brief VF, with BP animals exhibiting less countershock-induced dysfunction. After prolonged VF, the BP group had lower mean defibrillation thresholds (107+/-57 versus 172+/-88 J for MP, P=0.04) and significantly shorter resuscitation times (397+/-73.7 versus 488+/-74.3 seconds for MP, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: External defibrillation is more efficacious with BP countershocks than with MP countershocks. The lower defibrillation thresholds and shorter resuscitation times associated with BP waveform defibrillation may improve survival after prolonged VF arrest.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Scaling exponent predicts defibrillation success for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: -Defibrillator shocks often fail to terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA), and repeated failed shocks can worsen the subsequent response to therapy. Because the VF waveform changes with increasing duration of VF, it is possible that ECG analyses could estimate the preshock likelihood of defibrillation success. This study examined whether an amplitude-independent measure of preshock VF waveform morphology predicts outcome after defibrillation. Methods and Results-Clinical data and ECG recordings from an automated external defibrillator were obtained for 75 subjects with OOHCA in a suburban community with police first responders and a paramedic-based emergency medical system. An estimate of the fractal self-similarity dimension, the scaling exponent, was calculated off-line for the VF waveform preceding shocks. Success of the first shock was determined from the recordings. Return of pulses and survival were determined by chart review. The first shock resulted in an organized rhythm in 43% of cases, and 17% of cases survived to hospital discharge. A lower mean value of the scaling exponent was observed for cases in which the first defibrillation resulted in an organized rhythm (P:=0.004), for cases with return of pulses (P:=0.049), and for cases surviving to hospital discharge (P:<0.001). Receiver operator curves revealed the utility of the scaling exponent for predicting the probability of restoring an organized rhythm (area under the curve=0.70) and of survival (area under the curve=0.84). CONCLUSIONS: -The VF waveform in OOHCA can be quantified with the scaling exponent, which predicts the probability of first-shock defibrillation and survival to hospital discharge.

Aged↗
PubMed1978

A chronically implanted system for automatic defibrillation in active conscious dogs. Experimental model for treatment of sudden death from ventricular fibrillation.

Ventricular defibrillation was acheived in active conscious dogs with a chronically implanted automatic system composed of a defibrillator and an alternating current fibrillator. The hermetically sealed defibrillator is encased in titanium, weighs 250 g and has a volume of 145 ml. The sensor continuously monitors ventricular electircal activity and recognizes fibrillation by the absence of isoelectric potential segments. Fibrillation is induced by placing a magnet over the implanted fibrillator. The resulting syncope closely resembles the clinical entity of sudden death, while the defibrillator automatically restores normal rhythm with a truncated exponential pulse of 30 J, 15 seconds after the onset of the arrhythmia. The operational status of the defibrillator can be tested in vitro and noninvasively in vivo with an external analyzer. This experimental model allows for the first time a long-term study of the automatic implantable defibrillator approach to prevent sudden death from ventricular fibrillation under a variety of physiopathologic conditions.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Factors influencing the success of ventricular defibrillation in man.

To define the factors influencing the success of emergency ventricular defibrillation, we identified 52 patients defibrillated at the University of Iowa Hospital during 1974--1976. Thirty-eight patients were successfully defibrillated at least once; 14 could not be defibrillated, despite multiple attempts. Comparisons between these groups revealed no significant differences in body weight, heart weight, energy per kilogram of body weight and energy per gram of heart weight. Factors that militated against successful defibrillation included a prolonged delay before the first defibrillatory shock (successful 7 +/- 7 minutes (SD); unsuccessful 17 +/- 13 minutes, p less than 0.001), acidosis (successful pH 7.36 +/- 0.22; unsuccessful pH 7.23 +/- 0.12, p = 0.05) and hypoxia (successful PO2 100 + 98 torr; unsuccessful PO2 40 +/- 67 torr; p = 0.06). These three conditions tended to occur together in individual patients. Metabolic factors are important in determining defibrillation success; however, the role of high-energy doses is uncertain.

Acidosis↗
PubMed1984

Improved neurologic recovery and survival after early defibrillation.

Eighty-seven patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrests received defibrillating shocks delivered by minimally trained first responders before the arrival of paramedics in a city with short emergency response times. Their outcomes were compared with those of 370 other victims who received only basic life support by first responders until paramedics arrived. Survival was improved by early defibrillation in cases in which there was a delay in initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation and in which paramedic response times exceeded 9 min; there was 62% survival after early defibrillation by first responders and 27% if first responders provided only basic life support (p less than .02). Neurologic recovery was also improved after early defibrillation. Eighteen of 46 resuscitated patients (39%) receiving early defibrillation were awake at 24 hr compared with 49 of 204 patients (24%) who received only basic life support while awaiting paramedics (p less than .02). Incorporating defibrillation as part of basic life support can reduce both mortality and morbidity from cardiac arrest, even in cities with established, rapidly responding emergency care systems.

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed1986

Efficacy of an automated external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: validation of the diagnostic algorithm and initial clinical experience in a rural environment.

Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) may have advantages over manual defibrillation in managing prehospital cardiac arrest, particularly in rural communities. We conducted a two-part evaluation of a commercially available AED. We first established the diagnostic accuracy of the AED's rhythm recognition algorithm by challenging it with 205 cardiac arrest rhythms previously recorded from actual patients in the field. The AED demonstrated 100% specificity and 92% sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in this nonclinical setting. We then compared the clinical efficacy of AEDs in 18 small communities (study group) with that of manual defibrillation in 18 additional communities (control group) of similar size. Ambulance technicians using manual defibrillators correctly diagnosed VF more frequently than the AEDs (98% vs 83%; p less than .025). Specificity for VF was similar in the two groups (100% for AEDs vs 94% for technicians; p greater than .10). AEDs were able to deliver shocks more quickly than was possible with the manual defibrillators (1.56 vs 2.77 min; p less than .001). The ability of the AEDs to terminate VF was excellent, converting VF in 28 of 29 (97%) patients to some other rhythm compared with only 37 of 53 (70%) patients in the control group (p less than .01). Hospital admission and discharge rates were similar for the two groups. Ten of the 35 (29%) patients managed with AEDs achieved admission and six (17%) were ultimately discharged. In the control group 17 of 53 (33%) patients with VF were admitted and seven (13%) were discharged (p less than .75). AEDs are an effective alternative to manual defibrillation in small communities.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed1986

Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.

To examine the relationship between the defibrillation threshold and the strength of shocks that induce ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period, we determined the defibrillation threshold in 22 open-chest dogs using epicardial defibrillation electrodes with the cathode at the ventricular apex and the anode at the right atrium. We also determined whether there was an upper limit of shock strength that induces fibrillation in the vulnerable period by giving shocks of various energy through these same electrodes during the repolarization phase of paced rhythm. The above determinations were also made with the anode at the ventricular apex and the cathode at the right atrium in eight of the dogs and with the cathode at the ventricular apex and the anode at the left atrium in another eight of the dogs. In all dogs for all electrode configurations, there was an upper limit to the shock strength that induced ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period. Depending on the electrode combination, this upper limit of ventricular vulnerability either was not significantly different from or was slightly lower than the defibrillation threshold. The correlation coefficient between the two was highly significant for all three electrode configurations. These results support the hypothesis that successful defibrillation with epicardial electrodes requires a shock strength that reaches or exceeds the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability and that shocks slightly lower than the defibrillation threshold fail because they reinitiate ventricular fibrillation by stimulating portions of the myocardium during their vulnerable period.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Effects of encainide and its metabolites on energy requirements for defibrillation.

Encainide, a class IC antiarrhythmic agent, has been associated with proarrhythmic responses of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation requiring defibrillation in patients. We examined the short-term effects of intravenous encainide and its two major metabolites, O-demethyl-encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), on the energy requirements for successful defibrillation in 25 pentobarbital-anesthetized, open-chest dogs. Truncated exponential (60% tilt) defibrillation shocks were administered through right atrial spring and left ventricular epicardial patch electrodes identical to those used in man with the automatic implantable defibrillator. At baseline multiple shocks of varying energy were applied to construct curves of percent successful defibrillation as a function of energy (DF curves) for each animal. Encainide, ODE, or MODE was then infused in loading and maintenance doses to achieve QRS widening of 20% to 50%. Saline was administered to animals serving as controls. Determination of the DF curve was repeated, after which the infusion was discontinued. After 1 hr washout period, an additional DF curve was constructed. The data were analyzed by logistic regression, and the energies required for 50% successful defibrillation (E50) were compared. No significant differences existed between the four groups in body or heart weight, extent of QRS widening, or baseline E50 values. After administration of encainide and ODE, the E50 increased by 129 +/- 43% (p less than .001) and 76 +/- 34% (p less than .005), respectively. Return of E50 toward baseline was observed after the washout periods in both groups (p less than .025), demonstrating the reversibility of the drugs' effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anilides↗
PubMed1992

Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Two sequential biphasic shocks delivered over separate lead configurations markedly improve defibrillation efficacy compared with a single shock alone. We investigated the effect of varying the intershock interval between sequential biphasic shocks on defibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were obtained in six dogs for shock separations ranging from 0.2 to 125 msec. The first shock was given from a catheter electrode in the right ventricular apex to a patch on the left lateral thorax; the second was from a small patch on the left ventricular apex to a catheter electrode in the right ventricular outflow tract. When the interval between shocks was less than or equal to 10 msec or greater than or equal to 75 and less than or equal to 125 msec, the mean DFTs were less than that previously found for the first shock by itself (4.2 versus 7.4 J, p = 0.002). At a separation of 50 msec, however, there was a marked rise in the DFT to 27 J. The mean DFT for the second shock at a delay of 50 msec was not different from the mean DFT previously found for the second shock by itself (7.2 versus 7.0 J). These results were confirmed in another six dogs using defibrillation probability-of-success curves. In 12 other dogs, probability-of-success curves were generated for delays between shocks as a percentage of the activation interval during ventricular fibrillation. Minimum defibrillation energy requirements were at two separations, 0.2 msec and 90% of the activation interval. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal intershock interval between two sequential biphasic shocks is either less than or equal to 10 msec or greater than or equal to 75 and less than or equal to 125 msec. The marked rise in the DFT at a shock separation of 50 msec, requiring more energy than that for the first shock alone, suggests that the second shock at this time delay is likely to reinduce fibrillation after it is halted by the first shock until the second shock is strong enough to defibrillate independently of the first shock.

Animals↗