Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Complement Fixation Tests”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Serological diagnosis of influenza A and B infections by enzyme immunoassay. Comparison with the complement fixation test.

Paired sera from 784 patients with symptoms of acute respiratory disease were examined for antibodies against influenza A, B and parainfluenza (1 and 3) viruses by complement fixation (CF) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The internal variation of the EIA test results was low and an increase of 0.250 in absorbance values which corresponded to a two-fold increase in end-point titres was considered a diagnostic antibody rise. EIA detected significantly more diagnostic rises than the CF test in the case of influenza A (222 vs. 162, P less than 0.001) and parainfluenza virus antibodies (29 vs. 16, P less than 0.01). More diagnostic rises in influenza B antibodies were also observed by EIA compared to the CF test (104 vs. 99, not significant). There were only two patients who showed a diagnostic rise in CF antibodies (both influenza B) but not in EIA. Most often patients with a diagnostic antibody rise only by the EIA method had a two-fold rise in the respective CF antibodies (68% of cases). EIA was found to be a sensitive and reliable method for the serological diagnosis of influenza A, B and parainfluenza infections.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed1993

[Reaction of the complement fixation test on microtitration plates: application to the serology of myxomatosis. Comparative study of the results with the reaction of indirect immunofluorescence].

The authors describe a complement fixation technique on microtitration plates, using an antigen prepared from myxomas induced in rabbits. Compared with indirect immunofluorescence this technique was less cumbersome, more economical, easier to read and (as a conventional procedure) applicable in all laboratories. Results obtained with 165 serum samples tested by both methods showed good correlation and a specificity at least equal to that of indirect immunofluorescence. Taking into account its lower sensitivity, the positive threshold value for complement fixation under the described experimental conditions was a dilution of 1:4 (H50).

Animals↗