Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cefazolin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49Linked to original sources
PubMed1983

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for beta-lactam antibiotics I: Tissue distribution and elimination in rats.

The disposition characteristics of beta-lactam antibiotics in rats were investigated, and a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model capable of predicting the tissue distribution and elimination kinetics of these drugs was developed. Protein-binding parameters in rat serum were determined by equilibrium dialysis. Linear binding was found for penicillin G, methicillin, dicloxacillin, and ampicillin; however, nonlinear binding was observed for penicillin V and cefazolin. After intravenous bolus dosing, cefazolin was recovered almost completely in urine and bile, while for the penicillins, penicilloic acid was found to be the major metabolite. Biliary excretion of cefazolin followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics, and no significant inhibition of urinary secretion was observed after probenecid administration. The renal clearance of unbound drug was 0.82 ml/min with a reabsorption ratio (R) of 0.22. Tubular secretion was inhibited for the penicillins by probenecid plasma concentrations of 50 micrograms/ml, resulting in an R-value of 0.32. Erythrocyte uptake, serum protein binding, and tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient (Kp) were measured. Theoretical Kp values were calculated and found to be in good agreement with the Kp values for three of the antibiotics. Plasma and tissue concentrations (lung, heart, muscle, skin, gut, bone, liver, and kidney) were measured as a function of time at various doses for inulin and cefazolin in rats after an intravenous bolus dose, and were found to be in reasonable agreement with concentrations predicted by the model. These correlations demonstrate that the proposed model can accurately describe the plasma and tissue contributions of inulin and cefazolin in the rat and suggest that this model could have utility in predicting drug distribution in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1977

Laboratory evaluation of FR10024 a new cephalosporin derivative.

FR10024 is a broad-spectrum antibiotic. The in vitro antibacterial activity of FR10024 against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis is greater than that of any of the cephalosporins developed to date. Indole-positive Proteus, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter are resistant to FR10024, as is true for the other cephalosporins. However, more than half of the strains of Enterobacter and Citrobacter tested were susceptible to FR10024 at an inoculum of 10(6) cells/ml. A single subcutaneous injection of FR10024 to mice with peritoneal infections due to S. aureus and several species of gram-negative bacilli gave a protective effect inferior to that of cefazolin but appeared to be superior to that of cephalothin. When given in two divided doses, however, the protective effect of FR10024 was enhanced and almost equaled that of cefazolin. The serum levels and rates of urinary recovery of FR10024 varied in different animal species. The mean peak serum level of FR10024 in humans after a single intramuscular injection of 500 mg was two times higher than that of cephalothin. The serum half-life after intramuscular injections of 250 and 500 mg was slightly shorter than that of cephalothin. After receiving 250 mg of FR10024 intramuscularly the urinary recovery rate was 87.7% in healthy volunteers. The biliary excretion rate of FR10024 was particularly high. The 24-h excretion of FR10024 in rats was 63.3%, this being six to seven times higher than that for cefazolin, which has the highest biliary excretion of the other known cephalosporins. When FR10024 was injected intramuscularly (20 mg/kg), it was found that the hepatic levels of FR10024 in rats were the highest of all the cephalosporins, including cefazolin, but the levels of FR10024 in other tissues were not as high as those of cefazolin.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Ceftezole, a new cephalosporin C derivative I. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity.

Ceftezole, a new cephalosporin antibiotic similar to cefazolin, has the following chemical structure: (6R,7R)-8-oxo-7[2-(1H-tetrazol-1-yl)acetamido]-3-[(1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)methyl]-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-carboxylic acid. Ceftezole was found to be a broad-spectrum antibiotic, active in vitro against many species of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria except Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris. The activity of ceftezole against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. appeared to be nearly equal to that of cefazolin and higher than those of cephaloridine and cephalothin. Cross-resistance was observed between ampicillin and cephaloridine, but not between ampicillin and ceftezole, in susceptibility tests on clinical isolates of P. mirabilis. The in vitro activity was little affected by the inoculum size, the presence of human serum or the test medium. Ceftezole exhibited apparent bactericidal activity at the concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against both S. aureus and E. coli. The development in vitro of resistance by S. aureus 209p and E. coli NIHJ to ceftezole after 16 transfers was similar to or somewhat slower than that to other drugs tested. Ceftezole was relatively stable in nutrient broth and minimally degraded in the serum or tissue homogenates of rats. Ceftezole, in a single subcutaneous administration, exhibited somewhat less efficacy in mice against intraperitoneal infections with Streptococcus pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, E. coli, K. pneumoniae or P. mirabilis than either cephaloridine or cefazolin. However, ceftezole exhibited efficacy similar to that of cephaloridine or cefazolin when administered in three doses. Furthermore, ceftezole was as effective as cefazolin in the treatment of experimental abscesses in mice caused by subcutaneous inoculation with S. aureus.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A 12-month review of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in Western Australia: is empiric vancomycin still indicated for some patients?

BACKGROUND: The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines recommend empiric therapy with cefazolin and ceftazidime for peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. Empiric cefazolin therapy may have diminishing efficacy because of emerging methicillin resistance in gram-positive bacteria (GPB). Western Australia also has large numbers of Aboriginal and isolated regional patients, where giving these antimicrobials can be impractical. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, based on local antimicrobial resistance patterns, the feasibility of following ISPD guidelines in Western Australia and to identify any subgroups of PD peritonitis patients that may benefit from alternative empiric intraperitoneal antibiotics (e.g., vancomycin). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of all PD peritonitis episodes in Western Australia from 1 February 2000 to 31 January 2001. SETTING: Three adult tertiary referral university hospitals and their PD patients in metropolitan Perth and regional Western Australia. PATIENTS: All adults on PD in Western Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Isolates and antibiograms were analyzed versus patient characteristics, including race and patient demographics. RESULTS: 293 patients (28% Aborigines, 32% regional patients) received PD. 145 episodes of PD peritonitis occurred during the study. The overall PD peritonitis rate was 1 episode/16 patient months, with Aborigines having 1 episode/10.5 patient months versus non-Aborigines having 1 episode/17 patient months (p < 0.001). 36% of isolates from PD peritonitis episodes were resistant to cefazolin or ceftazidime. 22% were methicillin-resistant GPB (MR-GPB) [18% coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 1.6% MR Staphylococcus aureus]; 2.5% were multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB); 5.7% were polymicrobial (MR-GPB and/or MDR-GNB); and 5.7% were fungal. 63% of CoNS were methicillin resistant. Non-Aboriginal patients yielded MR-GPB in 22% of isolates versus 23% in Aborigines (p = 0.9). Six of seven cases of fungal peritonitis occurred in Aboriginal patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population the ISPD guidelines were appropriate for 64% of patients with PD peritonitis. We could not identify specific patient subgroups where empiric cefazolin use could be more effective. High proportions of MR-GPB PD peritonitis episodes, along with local factors, make empiric cefazolin unsuitable for many regional PD patients in Western Australia.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

[Antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from pathological specimens and utilization of beta-lactams in an orthopedic surgery service].

From 1980 to 1984, computerized data on the sensitivity to the main antibiotics of 1991 strains isolated from clinical specimens were evaluated in relation to beta-lactam use and hospital activity in a unit of orthopedic surgery. No major variations were found in distribution of species throughout the study period, whereas sensitivity to antimicrobial agents changed. From 1980 to 1982, patients had postoperative prophylactic treatment with cephalosporin (cefazolin) for two days; during the same period, 59% of 557 Gram negative organisms were resistant to cefazolin and 31% of Staphylococci were resistant to methicillin (and to other antibiotics). In 1983 and 1984, cefazolin was replaced by intraoperative flash therapy with a penicillin-M (cloxacillin); concomitantly, sensitivity to cefazolin increased among Gram negative organisms (38% of 485 isolates were cefazolin-resistant; p less than 0.001) and Staphylococci (16% of 342 isolates were methicillin-resistant; p less than 0.001). Phage typing of S. aureus failed to disclose any epidemic outbreak. Since hospital activity remained the same throughout the period under study, it seems justified to correlate the increase in bacterial sensitivity observed to the decrease in use of cephalosporin, although other factors (microepidemic, isolation techniques) may be involved.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1982

Update of safety of cefotaxime.

Adverse reactions to various antibacterial drugs were compared in a review of the following: multiple-dose studies of cefotaxime (n = 3,463), cefazolin (n = 554), the combination gentamicin-clindamycin (n = 163), and cefoxitin (n = 18); prophylactic studies of cefotaxime (n = 300) and cefazolin (n = 149); and single-dose studies of cefotaxime (n = 314) and penicillin G procaine (n - 265). The demographic and background characteristics of the groups were similar. Results of extensive pretreatment and posttreatment laboratory tests, measures of vital signs, and physical examinations revealed no clinically important intergroup differences. In the multiple-dose studies, side effects were reported in 9.8% of the cefotaxime, 3.8% of the cefazolin, 17.2% of the gentamicin-clindamycin, and 16.7% of the cefoxitin patients. The most frequent side effects were reactions at the injection site, of the skin and appendages, and of the digestive and urogenital systems, the only significant difference being fewer injection-site reactions in the cefazolin group than in the other three groups. In the prophylactic studies one cefotaxime patient reported rash and pruritus. In the single-dose studies, side effects were reported in 1.6% of the cefotaxime and 4.2% of the penicillin patients. Side effects sufficiently severe to warrant drug discontinuation were reported in 2.1% of the cefotaxime, 0.7% of the cefazolin, 1.8% of the gentamicin-clindamycin, and in none of the cefoxitin patients. Posttreatment prolongation of prothrombin time was found in one cefotaxime patient, whose pretreatment value was also abnormal, and in two gentamicin-clindamycin patients. No patient deaths were attributed to any of the drugs.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1978

Cephalosporins: use review and cost analysis.

The prescribing patterns for the cephalosporins and the cost-savings following restriction of cephalothin sodium and approval of cefazolin sodium were studied over a three-year period at a university hospital. The prescribing patterns for cefazolin relative to dose, frequency, duration of therapy and clinical indications were studied for 64 patients during a one-month period. Parenteral cephalosporin use for three years was analyzed to determine comparative use rates and costs. For the most part, cefazolin was used properly during the one-month study. The greatest misuse was as prophylactic therapy in postsurgical patients. The switch from cephalothin to cefazolin resulted in a projected annual savings of $5,500, equal to more than 10% of the hospital's expenditures for parenteral cephalosporins. The prescribed daily dose of cephalosporin dropped by one-third following the formulary change. The decision to use cefazolin as the major parenteral cephalosporin resulted in substantial cost savings.

Arizona↗
PubMed1982

Use of clinical pharmacists to reduce cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin costs.

The financial impact of using cefamandole and cefoxitin rather than cefazolin and of using ticarcillin rather than carbenicillin in one institution was assessed; the effectiveness of clinical pharmacists in reducing the costs associated with these drugs also was determined. During Phase 1 (July 1, 1980-March 31, 1981), the numbers of intravenous piggyback cefazolin, cephalothin, cefamandole, cefoxitin, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin doses prepared were recorded. Quarterly purchase data for each drug were determined from invoice records. During Phase 2 (April 1, 1981-September 30, 1981), eight clinical pharmacists reviewed all patient charts for cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin orders. If the indication for these orders was missing or considered inappropriate, the pharmacist contacted the prescriber and recommended substituting appropriate doses of cefazolin for cefamandole and cefoxitin and of carbenicillin for ticarcillin. The number of doses prepared and quarterly purchase data were collected as in Phase 1. The projected savings resulting from clinical pharmacist input relating to these drugs was calculated. Based on Phase 1 data, the total theoretical expense resulting from cefamandole and cefoxitin use instead of cefazolin and from ticarcillin use in place of carbenicillin was projected to be $233,448 annually. Cefamandole and cefoxitin accounted for 59.8 and 39.7% of total cephalosporin use in Phases 1 and 2, respectively. Ticarcillin accounted for 77.1% of the total ticarcillin and carbenicillin doses in Phase 1, and 16.6% in Phase 2. A projected annual savings of $156,756 was achieved because of clinical pharmacist input at a cost of $16,000 for time devoted to the effort. Clinical pharmacists were effective in reducing the use of cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin in situations where cefazolin or carbenicillin could be substituted.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1981

[Fundamental and clinica evaluation of cefoxitin in children (author's transl)].

Fundamental and clinical evaluations were made on cefoxitin, a new cephamycin antibiotic, and the following results were obtained. 1) MIC of the drug to clinical isolates was determined and was higher than that of cefazolin to Gram-positive bacilli. Among Gram-negative rods, the drug showed a sufficient antibacterial activity even to cefazolin-resistant strains. However, the MIC of cefoxitin to cefazolin-sensitive strains tended to be higher than that of cefazolin. 2) As to the passage of cefoxitin in experimental staphylococcal meningitis in rabbits, a percentage of CSF/serum ratio of AUC was 10.7% up to 3 hours and CSF/serum ratio of T1/2 was 1.78 of which value was an intermediate between those of ampicillin and cefazolin. There were, however, larger individual differences. 3) Blood concentrations and urinary recovery rates were determined in 2 children. In 1 patient, in whom the drug was given intravenously at a dose of 25 mg/kg, a blood concentration after 30 minutes was 50 microgram/ml, T1/2 was 57.2 minutes. This patient, however, showed a slight renal dysfunction. In another patient, who received an intravenous injection of 12.5 mg/kg, a 30 minutes blood concentration was 14.6 microgram/ml and T1/2 was 31.8 minutes. Urinary recovery rates up to 6 hours were 85.8% and 73.5%, respectively. 4) Thirty patients with the following bacterial infections were treated with cefoxitin, i.e., urinary tract infection (24 cases), respiratory tract infection (4 cases), each one case of peritonitis and suspected sepsis. An overall efficacy rate was 93.3%, i.e., excellent in 13 cases, good in 15, and failure in 2. Disappearance rate of the causative organism of the 23 clinical isolates was 87.0%, i.e., that the causative organism disappeared in 20 strains, reduced in 1 and persisted in 2. 5) Based on the above results, it was concluded that cefoxitin is a potent new antibiotic in bacterial infections in children, particularly respiratory and urinary tract infections. The optimal recommended dose will be about 25 mg/kg which should be given 3-4 times daily intravenously or by drip infusion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Investigations of the bacteriologic factors in cervical disk surgery.

A study was undertaken to evaluate the potential risk of wound infection in cervical disk disease, the appropriateness of the current prophylactic regimen of intravenous cefazolin at Good Samaritan Hospital, and the increasing resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci in nosocomial infections. In addition, the methodology used in three prior studies was used to verify that double-gloving is a more effective barrier to bacterial contamination than single-gloving and that topical streptomycin lavage is superior to constant irrigation with plain saline. No wound infections were documented in the 40 patients who underwent cervical disk surgery in a 12-month period. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species were the most common bacterial isolate, but only 20% were resistant to cefazolin. Of the 11 S. aureus isolates, 9 were sensitive to cefazolin and 2 were methicillin resistant. A remarkable 95% (114/120) of the intraoperative wound cultures were free of bacteria. In only 2 cases was there a serial increase in colonies of the same organism over the course of the operation. There was one positive glove culture--coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sensitive to cefazolin. The patient's skin was identified as the source of contamination in 3 intraoperative cultures of the wound and 2 cultures of the ambient operating room air. Neither individual biotyping of bacteria nor antimicrobial susceptibility testing uncovered any consistent source or pattern to account for the organisms in the surgical wound or ambient operating room air. Bacteria resistant to cefazolin were found in 36% of the intraoperative environmental cultures but in only 16% of the isolates from patients' skin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Prophylactic antibiotics for head and neck surgery with flap reconstruction.

The leading cause of postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing major head and neck surgical procedures is postoperative infection. This prospective randomized multi-institutional clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of clindamycin phosphate and high-dose cefazolin sodium therapy in preventing postoperative wound sepsis in patients undergoing contaminated head and neck surgical procedures in which flap reconstruction was required. Either clindamycin phosphate (900 mg) or cefazolin sodium (2 g) therapy was instituted intravenously prior to surgery and continued every 8 hours, for a total of 24 hours. The patients received postoperative follow-up, and the wounds were graded according to the worst condition observed. One hundred cases were evaluated. Fifty-one patients received clindamycin and 49 patients received high doses of cefazolin; wound infection developed in 10 patients (19.6%) and 11 patients (21.6%), respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. The average duration of surgery was approximately 8 hours for both the infected and the noninfected groups of patients. High-dose cefazolin and clindamycin have similar efficacy when administered prophylactically under these circumstances. Reconstruction with free vascularized tissue may aid in reducing postoperative wound infection.

Cefazolin↗
PubMed1989

Prophylactic antibiotherapy in abdominal surgery. First- vs third-generation cephalosporins.

To compare the efficiency of antibioprophylaxis by cefazolin sodium or cefotaxime sodium, 3137 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery were included in a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. The patients were divided into four strata, according to the degree of contamination during the operation and the risk factors. Within each stratum, the patients were randomized into three groups of treatment: (1) cefazolin, (2) cefotaxime, and (3) nontreatment (control). Antibiotics were administered perioperatively in three intravenous doses of 1 g at eight-hour intervals. Patients undergoing colon surgery or with peritonitis at the time of the operation were excluded from the study. The wound abscess rate was significantly lower in the treated groups than in the control group, except in stratum 3 (contaminated surgery). The percentage of postoperative peritonitis was twice as low in the treated groups as in the control group. There was no difference between the groups receiving cefazolin or cefotaxime. The patients in the treated groups received significantly less postoperative antibiotics than the patients in the control group. In terms of cost, antibioprophylaxis by cefazolin seems to be warranted in all operations with a low anaerobic contamination.

Abdomen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Chemiluminescence flow-injection analysis of beta-lactam antibiotics using the luminol-permanganate reaction.

A new flow injection chemiluminescence (CL) method has been developed for the determination of six beta-lactam antibiotics, including amoxicillin, cefadroxil, cefoperazone sodium, cefazolin sodium, cefradine and ceftriaxone sodium. When the antibiotic was injected into a stream of KMnO4 with alkaline luminol, a strong CL signal was produced. The method allows the measurements of 0.1-50.0 mg/L amoxicillin, 0.1-80.0 mg/L cefadroxil, 1.0-30.0 mg/L cefoperazone sodium, 1.0-30.0 mg/L cefazolin sodium, 3.0-50.0 mg/L cefradine and 3.0-50.0 mg/L ceftriaxone sodium. The detection limits are 0.05 mg/L for amoxycillin, 0.05 mg/L for cefadroxil, 0.4 mg/L for cefoperazonum sodium, 0.4 mg/L for cefazolin sodium, 0.8 mg/L for cefradine and 0.8 mg/L for ceftriaxone sodium. The relative standard deviations in 11 repeated measurements are 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.5%, 1.2%, 0.4% and 0.3% for 3.0 mg/L amoxicillin, 1.0 mg/L cefadroxil, 10.0 mg/L cefoperazone sodium, 10.0 mg/L cefazolin sodium, 10.0 mg/L cefradine and 10.0 mg/L ceftriaxone sodium, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the determination of amoxicillin in pharmaceutical preparations. A possible CL reaction mechanism is also discussed.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed1988

Retinal toxicity of antibiotics: evaluation by electroretinogram.

Toxicity of an intravitreal injection of gentamicin sulfate, disodium sulbenicillin and cefazolin sodium on the retina was investigated by electroretinogram in albino and pigmented rabbits. Recordings were made before injection and 2 hours and 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after injection. Significant differences were found in the susceptibility of the electroretinogram components to various antibiotics as follows. Gentamicin 0.24 mg/0.1 ml irreversibly abolished all the components examined. Sulbenicillin 4.0, 8.0, or 12 mg/0.1 ml transiently suppressed the b-wave and the oscillatory potentials incrementally with increasing dose. Cefazolin 0.5, 2.0, or 5.0 mg/0.1 ml selectively reduced the oscillatory potentials, leaving the a- and b-waves almost unattenuated. The cefazolin-suppressed oscillatory potentials recovered within 14 days after injection. Judging from the most susceptible electroretinogram components to each antibiotic, we recommend intravitreal doses of these antibiotics for clinical use as follows: gentamicin 0.1 mg/0.1 ml, sulbenicillin 2 mg/0.1 ml, and cefazolin 0.25 mg/0.1 ml.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Interference by cephalosporins with creatinine measurement by desk-top analyzers.

We have carried out a study to evaluate the interference by cephalosporins with the measurement of creatinine by desk-top analyzers. The cephalosporins evaluated at concentrations of 0-250 mg/l were cefazolin sodium, cefoxitin sodium, cefotaxime sodium, and ceftazidime pentahydrate. The instruments evaluated were DT60 (Kodak, Rochester, USA), Seralyzer (Ames Division, Miles Laboratories, IN, USA), and Vision (Abbott Labs, Chicago, USA). All studies were done in plasma. None of the cephalosporins showed any interference with the DT60 analyzer. With the Vision and Seralyzer no interference was seen with cefotaxime or cefazolin. With cefazolin an increase of 10-20 mumol/l creatinine was seen for every 20 mg/l of drug; with cefoxitin there was an increase of 50-80 mumol/l of creatinine for every 100 mg/l of drug. Erroneous creatinine values may be found in patients taking cefazolin and cefoxitin and may lead to inappropriate clinical management.

Cefazolin↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetic significance of renal OAT3 (SLC22A8) for anionic drug elimination in patients with mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis.

PURPOSE: Our previous studies showed that the mRNA level of human organic anion transporter (hOAT) 3 in the kidney was correlated with the rate of elimination of an anionic antibiotic cefazolin. However, the correlation coefficient was not so high. In the present study, therefore, we enrolled more patients to examine whether additional factors were responsible for the correlation. METHODS: hOAT mRNA levels in renal biopsy specimens were quantified using the real-time polymerase chain reaction method. The elimination rates for the free fraction of cefazolin were determined in patients with various renal diseases. RESULTS: In the present study, the coefficient of correlation between the hOAT3 mRNA level and the elimination rates for the free fraction of cefazolin was not so high in the patients overall as in our previous study (r = 0.536). However, following the classification of renal diseases, a better correlation was obtained in patients with mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (r = 0.723). In contrast, multiple regression analyses including gender, age, and liver function did not result in any improvements in the correlation coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the hOAT3 mRNA level is a significant marker of pharmacokinetics with which to predict the rate of elimination of cefazolin in patients with mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Antibiotic prophylaxis: is there a difference?

Seven antibiotics, administered in 10 different regimens for prophylaxis, were randomly assigned to 1580 patients who were delivered by cesarean section. Cefazolin 1 gm, administered for three doses, served as the control group. Cefazolin 1 gm, cefazolin 2 gm, cefoxitin 1 gm, cefoxitin 2 gm, cefonicid 1 gm, cefotetan 1 gm, ceftizoxime 1 gm, ampicillin 2 gm, and piperacillin 4 gm were all administered in a single dose. Four antibiotics proved to be superior in preventing postpartum endometritis: ampicillin 2 gm (p = 0.03), cefazolin 2 gm (p = 0.005), piperacillin 4 gm (p = 0.0007), and cefotetan 1 gm (p = 0.0001). Single-dose cephalosporin antibiotic prophylaxis was found to result in approximately a twofold increase in Enterococcus faecalis colonization of the vagina (p less than 0.01). This may be significant in patients in whom postpartum endometritis develops and who have failure of initial treatment with a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, e.g., cefoxitin or cefotetan, or a combination such as clindamycin or metronidazole plus an aminoglycoside. Rupture of amniotic membranes for a half hour or more was associated with an increased risk for postpartum endometritis. The use of internal fetal monitoring was associated with an increased risk of soft tissue pelvic infection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Penetration of prophylactic antibiotics into peritoneal fluid.

This study evaluates the penetration of cephalosporins into the peritoneal fluid. Forty-six patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were randomized into three groups. On call to the operating room each patient was given a single 1 g dose of cefazolin, cefuroxime, or ceftazidime. Samples of the peritoneal fluid and blood were simultaneously obtained immediately after opening the peritoneal cavity. The mean serum cefazolin concentration was the highest. High peritoneal fluid levels of all three antibiotics were found; however, the antibacterial activity against common intestinal pathogens varied significantly. Cefazolin is the only study drug that possesses marginal in vitro activity against Streptococcus faecalis, a species generally considered resistent to cephalosporins. This study suggests that prophylactic second and third generation cephalosporins are not superior to cefazolin.

Abdomen↗