[Evaluation of post-intracoronary stent implant. Intravascular ultrasound versus quantitative angiography].
PURPOSE: To verify the minimal proximal and distal residual diameters by quantitative digital angiography and intravascular ultrasound, after the implantation of the intracoronary prosthesis. METHODS: We studied twenty patients with coronary atherosclerosis, ages ranging from 40 to 77 (56.7 +/- 10) years, 13 (65%) were male. Patients with eccentric obstructive atherosclerotic lesions of 70% or more in the proximal third of the anterior descendent, circumflex, or right coronary arteries received a stent implant as treatment for the obstruction. RESULTS: The mean proximal minimal residual diameters assessed by digital angiography were 3.32 +/- 0.33 mm and by ultrasound 3.08 +/- 0.31 mm (p < 0.05); the distal diameters by angiography were 3.33 +/- 0.37 mm and by ultrasound 3.05 +/- 0.39 mm (p < 0.05). Therefore, the measurements by ultrasound were always smaller. There is a significant linear correlation between measurements by angiography and ultrasound for both proximal (r = 0.92; p < 0.0001) and distal diameters (r = 0.91; p < 0.0001). The determination coefficient was 84% for proximal diameters and 87% for distal diameters. Therefore, the proximal diameters variate 16% and distal diameters 13% between both methods, due to the peculiarities of each method. CONCLUSION: Both methods correlate adequately, concerning to the measurements; the methods are interdependent, determining with the same accuracy intracoronary diameters in most cases studied; ultrasound is a safe and feasible technical resource for the evaluation of intravascular structures; the intravascular ultrasound system can contribute for the direct analysis inside the vascular structure, immediately after intracoronary stent implanting.