Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “long noncoding RNA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources

Loss of imprinting of long QT intronic transcript 1 in colorectal cancer.

Loss of imprinting (LOI) of the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and H19 genes on human chromosome 11 has been found not only in childhood tumors but also in common adult cancers including colorectal cancer. Recently, a transcript called LIT1 (long QT intronic transcript 1) has been identified within the KvLQT1 locus on chromosome 11. LIT1 is expressed preferentially from the paternal allele and is transcribed in most human tissues. LOI of LIT1 was found in a considerable number of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) patients, suggesting that it is associated with the etiology of BWS. Since LOI of IGF2 was observed in association with overexpression of IGF2 in colorectal cancer in our previous study, we examined the status of genomic imprinting of LIT1 and H19 in comparison with IGF2 in colorectal cancer. We examined 44 surgically dissected colorectal cancer tissues. Ten of them represented informative cases for LIT1. None of these patients exhibited loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of LIT1, and LOI of LIT1 was observed in 4 of the 10 (40%) informative patients, but not in non-cancerous tissues. Neither LOH nor LOI of H19 was observed. LOI of IGF2 was observed in 4 of 18 (22%) informative patients. These results suggest that LOI of LIT1 is frequently observed in colorectal cancer and may be a useful marker for diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11↗

X chromosome inactivation: theme and variations.

My contribution to this special issue on Vertebrate Sex Chromosomes deals with the theme of X chromosome inactivation and its variations. I will argue that the single active X--characteristic of mammalian X dosage compensation--is unique to mammals, and that the major underlying mechanism(s) must be the same for most of them. The variable features reflect modifications that do not interfere with the basic theme. These variations were acquired during mammalian evolution--to solve special needs for imprinting and locking in the inactive state. Some of the adaptations reinforce the basic theme, and were needed because of species differences in the timing of interacting developmental events. Elucidating the molecular basis for the single active X requires that we distinguish the mechanisms essential for the basic theme from those responsible for its variations.

Animals↗

X chromosome inactivation: how human are mice?

Mammals perform dosage compensation of X-linked gene products between XY males and XX females by transcriptionally silencing all but one X chromosome per diploid cell, a process called X chromosome inactivation (XCI). XCI involves counting X chromosomes in a cell, random or imprinted choice of one X to remain active, initiation and spread of the inactivation signal in CIS throughout the other X chromosomes, and maintenance of the inactive state of those X chromosomes during cell divisions thereafter. Most of what is known of the molecular mechanisms involved in the different steps of XCI has been studied in the mouse. In this review we compare XCI in mouse and human, and discuss how much of the murine data can be extrapolated to humans.

Animals↗

Spontaneous reactivation of the inactive X chromosome in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

The mouse embryonal carcinoma cell line MC12 carries two X chromosomes, one of which replicates late in S phase and shares properties with the normal inactive X chromosome and, therefore, is considered to be inactivated. Since the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) gene on the active X chromosome is mutated (HPRT(NDASH;)), MC12 cells lack HPRT activity. After subjecting MC12 cells to selection in HAT medium, however, a number of HAT-resistant clones (HAT(R)) appeared. The high frequency of HAT resistance (3.18 x 10(-4)) suggested reactivation of HPRT(PLUS;) on the inactive X chromosome rather than reversion of HPRT(NDASH;). Consistent with this view, cytological analyses showed that the reactivation occurred over the length of the inactive X chromosome in 11 of 20 HAT(R) clones isolated. The remaining nine clones retained a normal heterochromatic inactive X chromosome. The spontaneous reactivation rate of the HPRT(PLUS;) on the inactive X chromosome was relatively high (1.34 x 10(-6)) and comparable to that observed for XIST-deleted somatic cells (Csankovszki et al., 2001), suggesting that the inactivated state is poorly maintained in MC12 cells.

Aminopterin↗

Differential patterns of histone methylation and acetylation distinguish active and repressed alleles at X-linked genes.

In female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated to compensate for the difference in dosage of X-linked genes between males and females. X inactivation involves sequential alterations to the chromatin that ultimately lead to the transcriptional repression of genes on the X chromosome. Here, histone methylation and acetylation along X-linked genes are investigated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of adult fibroblast cell lines. At PGK1 and HPRT, chromatin on the active X chromosome reveals H3 lysine 4 methylation and acetylation of histones H3 and H4. These modifications are absent on the repressed allele, which is marked by H3 lysine 9 methylation. On the expressed allele of XIST (on the inactive X chromosome), we found that H3 acetylation is confined to the promoter, whereas H3 lysine 4 methylation and H4 acetylation are present along the entire gene. On the repressed XIST allele, in contrast, the promoter and gene exhibit H3 lysine 9 methylation. At only 1.5 kb upstream of the XIST gene, chromatin on the inactive X chromosome has strongly reduced levels of H4 acetylation and is marked by both H3 lysine 9 and H3 lysine 4 methylation. These data demonstrate that patterns of histone methylation and acetylation are distinct along and upstream of XIST and suggest that the inactive X chromatin configuration occurs at a region close to the 5' end of the gene.

Acetylation↗

Integrated kinetics of X chromosome inactivation in differentiating embryonic stem cells.

Inactivation of the X chromosome during early female development and the subsequent maintenance of this transcriptionally inert state through countless cell divisions remain a paradigm for epigenetic regulation in mammals. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms underlying this chromosome-wide silencing process remain unclear. Using differentiating female embryonic stem (ES) cells as a model system, we recently found that histone H3 tail modifications are among the earliest known chromatin changes in the X inactivation process, appearing as soon as Xist RNA accumulates on the X chromosome, but prior to transcriptional silencing of X-linked genes (Heard et al., 2001). In this report we present an integrated analysis of the sequence of early events and chromatin modifications underlying X inactivation in differentiating female ES cells. We have extended our previous analysis concerning changes in histone tail modification states. We find that the hypomethylation of Arg-17 and that of Lys-36 on histone H3 also characterize the inactive X chromosome, and that these profiles show a similarly early onset during the initiation of X inactivation. In addition, we have investigated the kinetics of the shift in replication timing of the X chromosome undergoing inactivation. This event occurs slightly later than Xist RNA coating and the chromatin modifications. Finally, from an early stage in the X inactivation process, characteristic histone modification patterns can be found on the X chromosome at mitosis, suggesting that they represent true epigenetic marks of the inactive state.

Acetylation↗

Ectopic XIST transcripts in human somatic cells show variable expression and localization.

XIST encodes a functional RNA that is expressed exclusively from the inactive X in female mammals and is required for the silencing of most of the genes on the chromosome. XIST transcripts remain in the nucleus, and their specific localization to the inactive X is important for silencing; however, it is not known how these transcripts localize to the inactive X chromosome. Expression of mouse and human XIST from ectopic sites has suggested that localization to the chromosome from which the gene is expressed may be dependent upon either the copy number of the integrated constructs or the level of ectopic XIST expression. To further examine the behavior of XIST transgenes when expressed from ectopic sites, we introduced an XIST-containing PAC into the human male somatic cell line HT-1080. In five different transformant clones, the degree of localization and associated DNA condensation of the surrounding chromatin varied within nuclei of the same clone, as well as among different clones. Comparing the number of integrated transgenes and the levels of XIST expression revealed that neither factor was sufficient for a tight localization of the XIST signal. Therefore, the extent of expression and localization of XIST transcripts from ectopic transgenes is likely dependent upon many interacting factors, including the number of integrated transgenes, the level of XIST expression, and the site of integration.

Gene Expression↗

Functional analysis of the highly conserved exon IV of XIST RNA.

X inactivation is effected by a large CIS-acting RNA molecule termed the X inactive specific transcript (XIST). Exon IV of XIST RNA is highly conserved at the primary sequence level and is predicted to form a stable stem-loop structure. These features suggest that it is important for XIST RNA function. We have used homologous recombination to delete exon IV of the mouse XIST gene. Surprisingly we found no detectable effects on X inactivation. Heterozygous female animals show normal random X inactivation and transcripts from the mutant allele were seen to localise IN CIS over the length of the inactive X chromosome. There was however a reduced steady state level of mutant relative to wild type XIST RNA. This effect was not attributable to decreased stability, suggesting that the deletion affects transcription or processing of XIST RNA.

Animals↗

Chromatin reprogramming of male somatic cell-derived XIST and TSIX in ES hybrid cells.

In mammalian somatic cells, the X chromosome is active in XY males, whereas one X chromosome is inactivated in XX females. On the active male X chromosome, the XIST and TSIX genes are transcribed in undifferentiated cells of pre-implantation embryos (undifferentiated state) and then down-regulated upon cell differentiation (differentiated state). To explore the epigenetic mechanism involved in the on-off switching of XIST and TSIX transcription in the active X chromosome, male somatic cells were hybridized with male embryonic stem (ES) cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed that the XIST gene derived from somatic cells was derepressed, as shown by the advent of two pinpoint signals. This was confirmed by strand-specific RT-PCR of XIST and TSIX genes. To analyze changes in chromatin structure in the promoter regions of XIST and TSIX derived from somatic cells, histone tail modifications were studied by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. Histones H3 and H4, which were hypoacetylated in the somatic cells, were hyperacetylated in the hybrid cells, and histone H3 lysine 4, which was hypomethylated in the somatic cells, was hypermethylated in the hybrid cells, indicating that the reactivation of XIST and TSIX was linked with chromatin modifications. In the telomeric region of DXPAS34, acetylation of histones H3 and H4 was dependent on reactivation of XIST and TSIX, whereas histone H3 lysine 4 was constitutively methylated independent of the transcriptional activity of those genes. We propose that the chromatin reprogramming is linked with the resetting of the memory found in the process of choosing an active X chromosome.

Animals↗

Effect of TSIX disruption on XIST expression in male ES cells.

XIST and its antisense partner, TSIX, encode non-coding RNAs and play key roles in X chromosome inactivation. Targeted disruption of TSIX causes ectopic expression of XIST in the extraembryonic tissues upon maternal transmission, which subsequently results in embryonic lethality due to inactivation of both X chromosomes in females and a single X chromosome in males. TSIX, therefore, plays a crucial role in maintaining the silenced state of XIST in CIS and regulates the imprinted X inactivation in the extraembryonic tissues. In this study, we examined the effect of TSIX disruption on XIST expression in the embryonic lineage using embryonic stem (ES) cells as a model system. Upon differentiation, XIST is ectopically activated in a subset of the nuclei of male ES cells harboring the TSIX-deficient X chromosome. Such ectopic expression, however, eventually ceased during prolonged culture. It is likely that surveillance by the X chromosome counting mechanism somehow shuts off the ectopic expression of XIST before inactivation of the X chromosome.

Animals↗

The proportion of cells with functional X disomy is associated with the severity of mental retardation in mosaic ring X Turner syndrome females.

Turner syndrome females (45,X) do not have mental retardation (MR), whereas some mosaic ring X Turner syndrome females, with 45,X/46,X,r(X), have severe MR. The MR is believed to be caused by a failure of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) of the small ring X chromosome, which leads to functional X disomy (FXD), To explore this hypothesis, we examined the proportion of FXD cells in the peripheral blood of four ring X Turner syndrome females with various levels of MR, using two newly developed XCI assays based on DNA methylation of X-linked genes. As a result, the two patients with extremely severe MR showed complete FXD patterns, whereas the remaining two patients with relatively milder MR showed partial FXD patterns. These results indicate that the proportion of FXD cells may be associated with the severity of MR in mosaic ring X Turner syndrome females, although this association should be confirmed by examining brain cells during development. One of the cases with severe MR and a complete FXD pattern neither lacked the XIST gene nor had uniparental X isodisomy, and we discuss the mechanism of the failure of XCI in this case.

Child↗

Molecular genetics of spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8).

We previously reported that a transcribed but untranslated CTG expansion causes a novel form of ataxia, spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8) (Koob et al., 1999). SCA8 was the first example of a dominant spinocerebellar ataxia that is not caused by the expansion of a CAG repeat translated into a polyglutamine tract. This slowly progressive form of ataxia is characterized by dramatic repeat instability and a high degree of reduced penetrance. The clinical and genetic features of the disease are discussed below.

Brain Stem↗

Clarifications on breakpoints in HSAX and BTAX by comparative mapping of F9, HPRT, and XIST in cattle.

The coagulation factor IX gene (F9), the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 gene (HPRT1), and the X-inactive specific transcript gene (XIST) were physically assigned in cattle to analyze chromosomal breakpoints on BTAX recently identified by radiation hybrid (RH) mapping experiments. Whereas the FISH assignment of XIST indicates a similar location on the q-arm of the human and cattle X chromosomes, the locus of HPRT1 supported the assumption of a chromosome rearrangement between the distal half of the q-arm of HSAX and the p-arm of BTAX identified by RH mapping. F9 previously located on the q-arm of BTAX was assigned to the p-arm of BTAX using RH mapping and FISH. The suggested new position of F9 close to HPRT1 supports the homology between HSAXq and BTAXp. The F9 locus corresponds with the gene order found in the homologous human chromosome segment. XIST was assigned on BTAXq23, HPRT1 and F9 were mapped to BTAXp22, and the verification of the location of F9 in a 5000 rad cattle-hamster whole genome radiation hybrid panel linked the gene to markers URB10 and HPRT1.

Animals↗

Molecular aspects of XY body formation.

More than a century ago, a densely stained area inside the nucleus of male meiotic cells was described. It was later shown to harbor the sex chromosomes which undergo transcriptional inactivation in conjunction with heterochromatinisation and synapsis to form the XY body. Formation of the XY body is conserved throughout the mammalian phylogenetic tree and is thought to be essential for successful spermatogenesis. However, its biological role as well as the molecular mechanisms underlying XY body formation are still far from being understood. A lot of effort has already been undertaken to characterize components of the XY body and to investigate their functional implications in sex chromatin heterochromatinisation and meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI). This review gives an overview of those components and their possible implications in XY body formation and function.

Animals↗

Establishment and maintenance of H19 imprinting in the germline and preimplantation embryo.

The mouse H19 and Igf2 genes are oppositely imprinted and share enhancers that reside 3' to the genes. The imprinted expression of these genes is coordinated by a 2-kb regulatory element, the differentially methylated domain (DMD), positioned between the two genes. The methylation status of this region determines the ability of the insulator factor CTCF to bind to its sites in the DMD. Deletions and mutations of the DMD that affect imprinting in the soma have little effect on the methylation pattern of H19 in the germline, suggesting that additional sequences and factors contribute to the earliest stages of imprinting regulation at this locus. Less is known about these initial steps, which include the marking of the parental alleles, the onset of allele-specific expression patterns and maintenance of the imprints in the preimplantation embryo. Here, we will focus on these early steps, summarizing what is known and what questions remain to be addressed.

Animals↗

The H19 gene: regulation and function of a non-coding RNA.

The H19 gene encodes a 2.3-kb non-coding mRNA which is strongly expressed during embryogenesis. This gene belongs to an imprinted cluster, conserved on mouse chromosome 7 and human chromosome 11p15. H19 is maternally expressed and the neighbouring Igf2 gene is transcribed from the paternal allele. These two genes are co-expressed in endoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues during embryonic development, which suggests a common mechanism of regulation. The regulatory elements (imprinted control region, CTCF insulation, different enhancer sequences, promoters of the two genes, matrix attachment regions) confer a differential chromatin architecture to the two parental alleles leading to reciprocal expression. The role of the H19 gene is unclear but different aspects have been proposed. H19 influences growth by way of a cis control on Igf2 expression. Although H19(-/-) mice are viable, a role for this gene during development has been suggested by viable H19(-/-) parthenogenetic mice. Finally it has been described as a putative tumour suppressor gene. H19 has been studied by numerous laboratories over the last fifteen years, nevertheless the function of this non-coding RNA remains to be elucidated.

Animals↗

The 3' portion of the mouse H19 Imprinting-Control Region is required for proper tissue-specific expression of the Igf2 gene.

Genomic imprinting at the H19/Igf2 locus is governed by a cis-acting Imprinting-Control Region (ICR), located 2 kb upstream of the H19 gene. This region possesses an insulator function which is activated on the unmethylated maternal allele through the binding of the CTCF factor. It has been previously reported that paternal transmission of the H19(SilK) deletion, which removes the 3' portion of H19 ICR, leads to the loss of H19 imprinting. Here we show that, in the liver, this reactivation of the paternal H19 gene is concomitant to a dramatic decrease in Igf2 mRNA levels. This deletion alters higher-order chromatin architecture, Igf2 promoter usage and tissue-specific expression. Therefore, when methylated, the 3' portion of the H19 ICR is a bi-functional regulatory element involved not only in H19 imprinting but also in 'formatting' the higher-order chromatin structure for proper tissue-specific expression of both H19 and Igf2 genes.

Animals↗

Mutagenesis in mice of nuclear hormone receptor binding sites in the Igf2/H19 imprinting control region.

The H19/Igf2 imprinting control region (ICR) is a DNA methylation-dependent chromatin insulator in somatic cells. The hypomethylated maternally inherited ICR binds the insulator protein CTCF at four sites, and blocks activity of the proximal Igf2 promoter by insulating it from the shared distal enhancers. The hypermethylated paternally inherited ICR lacks CTCF binding and insulator activity, but induces methylation-silencing of the paternal H19 promoter. The paternal-specific methylation of the ICR is established in the male germ cells, while the ICR emerges from the female germ line in an unmethylated form. Despite several attempts to find cis-regulatory elements, it is still unknown what determines these male and female germ cell-specific epigenetic modifications. We recently proposed that five in vivo footprints spanning fifteen half nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) binding sites within the ICR might be involved, and here we report on the effects of mutagenizing all of these half sites in mice. No effect was obtained--in the female and male germ lines the mutant ICR remained hypomethylated and hypermethylated, respectively. The ICR imprinting mechanism remains undefined.

Animals↗