Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reproductive Technologies”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Current status and potential of embryo transfer and reproductive technology in dairy cattle.

Significant use of embryo transfer in dairy cattle commenced with the introduction of nonsurgical embryo recovery in the mid-1970s and developed with the use of nonsurgical transfers in the late 1970s. Numbers of registered Holstein calves from embryo transfer doubled yearly through 1980, after which the rate of increase slowed; the total reached nearly 19,000 calves in 1990. However, the efficacy of superovulation procedures and commercial success rates of transferred fresh embryos have not improved the past 10 to 15 yr. Fertilization rates in superovulated donors remain low. Although embryo-splitting techniques were perfected in the early 1980s, they are not used widely. A practical, commercial embryo-sexing procedure remains unavailable. Recent significant improvement is apparent in the technology of ultrasound-guided oocyte collection and in vitro oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo culture. In the future, this technology may be used in conjunction with sperm separated by sex with a flow cytometer. Modest numbers of embryo clones have been produced in several commercial programs via nuclear transfer techniques. However, the efficiency of gene transfer experiments involving ova of cattle and other domestic species has been low. Recently, DNA probe technology has begun to provide genotype information for cattle and will ultimately be applied to embryos.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Multiple gestation as a marker of reproductive efficacy: learning from assisted reproductive technologies.

This study postulates that apart from the number of embryos transferred, women with multiple gestation represent a subgroup of highly fertile individuals, whose embryos implant with higher efficiency than women with single gestation. Furthermore, each embryo generated from these women has a higher chance of reaching full term. The objective of this study was to compare implantation rate with the outcome of pregnancy (up to week 20) in multiple gestations following assisted reproductive techniques. The study group comprised 162 women with multiple gestation after assisted reproduction, followed prospectively with at least three ultrasound examinations performed between weeks 5 and 20 after the last menstrual period. Control group A comprised 344 fertile women with spontaneous single pregnancy followed with transvaginal ultrasound. Control group B consisted of 317 infertile women conceiving with single gestation after assisted reproduction and followed prospectively as in the study group. Embryo implantation rate and spontaneous embryo/fetal reduction, either partial or total (abortion), were registered in each case. Overall implantation in women with multiple gestation was higher (54.6%) than in the corresponding controls (25.6%). Furthermore, spontaneous embryo/fetus reduction was similar in the study cases and in fertile women (12.6 and 10.8% respectively) and significantly smaller than in the control group B (20.8%). Women with high reproductive efficacy exposed to assisted reproductive techniques generate cohorts of good quality embryos, with a high chance of implantation and of reaching birth.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Bioethics of teaching about reproductive technology and prenatal diagnosis choices in Japan.

The results of teaching trials among students in Japan are reported, examining their attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and ART over a course of lectures. The students tended to be more negative than the general public over the use of prenatal diagnosis. The results of attitude changes, and example comments to explain the categorization process are given. The students had a diversity of comments and could reason about the examples of technology used, but were characterized by a higher percentage of uncertainty than in the general public even after lectures on bioethics.

Attitude↗