Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

mHDA1/HDAC5 histone deacetylase interacts with and represses MEF2A transcriptional activity.

Recently we identified a new family of histone deacetylases in higher eukaryotes related to yeast HDA1 and showed their differentiation-dependent expression. Data presented here indicate that HDAC5 (previously named mHDA1), one member of this family, might be a potent regulator of cell differentiation by interacting specifically with determinant transcription factors. We found that HDAC5 was able to interact in vivo and in vitro with MEF2A, a MADS box transcription factor, and to strongly inhibit its transcriptional activity. Surprisingly, this repression was independent of HDAC5 deacetylase domain. The N-terminal non-deacetylase domain of HDAC5 was able to ensure an efficient repression of MEF2A-dependent transcription. We then mapped protein domains involved in the HDAC5-MEF2A interaction and showed that MADS box/MEF2-domain region of MEF2A interacts specifically with a limited region in the N-terminal part of HDAC5 which also possesses a distinct repressor domain. These data show that two independent class II histone deacetylases HDAC4 and HDAC5 are able to interact with members of the MEF2 transcription factor family and regulate their transcriptional activity, thus suggesting a critical role for these deacetylases in the control of cell proliferation/differentiation.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2000

Identification of a boundary domain adjacent to the potent human cytomegalovirus enhancer that represses transcription of the divergent UL127 promoter.

Transcriptional repression within a complex modular promoter may play a key role in determining the action of enhancer elements. In human cytomegalovirus, the major immediate-early promoter (MIEP) locus contains a highly potent and complex modular enhancer. Evidence is presented suggesting that sequences of the MIEP between nucleotide positions -556 and -673 function to prevent transcription activation by enhancer elements from the UL127 open reading frame divergent promoter. Transient transfection assays of reporter plasmids revealed repressor sequences located between nucleotides -556 and -638. The ability of these sequences to confer repression in the context of an infection was shown using recombinant viruses generated from a bacterial artificial chromosome containing an infectious human cytomegalovirus genome. In addition to repressor sequences between -556 and -638, infection experiments using recombinant virus mutants indicated that sequences between -638 and -673 also contribute to repression of the UL127 promoter. On the basis of in vitro transcription and transient transfection assays, we further show that interposed viral repressor sequences completely inhibit enhancer-mediated activation of not only the homologous but also heterologous promoters. These and other experiments suggest that repression involves an interaction of host-encoded regulatory factors with defined promoter sequences that have the property of proximally interfering with upstream enhancer elements in a chromatin-independent manner. Altogether, our findings establish the presence of a boundary domain that efficiently blocks enhancer-promoter interactions, thus explaining how the enhancer can work to selectively activate the MIEP.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

c-Myb repression of c-erbB-2 transcription by direct binding to the c-erbB-2 promoter.

The c-myb proto-oncogene product (c-Myb) is a transcriptional activator that can bind to the specific DNA sequences. Although c-Myb also represses an artificial promoter containing the Myb binding sites, natural target genes transcriptionally repressed by c-Myb have not been identified. We have found that the human c-erbB-2 promoter activity is repressed by c-Myb or B-Myb in a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase co-transfection assay. Domain analyses of c-Myb suggested that Myb represses the c-erbB-2 promoter activity by competing with positive regulators of the c-erbB-2 promoter. In in vitro transcription assays, Myb proteins containing only the DNA binding domain could repress c-erbB-2 promoter activity. Two Myb binding sites in the c-erbB-2 promoter were critical for transcriptional repression by c-Myb. One of the two Myb binding sites overlaps the TATA box, and DNase I footprint analyses indicated that c-Myb can compete with TFIID. These results suggest that Myb-induced trans-repression of the c-erbB-2 promoter partly involves competition between Myb and TFIID.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Phosphorylation and activation of B-Myb by cyclin A-Cdk2.

BACKGROUND: Cyclins and their catalytic partners, the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), function as key regulators of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Specific cyclin-Cdk complexes are active at successive stages during the cell cycle and control cell-cycle progression by phosphorylating specific target proteins, most of which have not yet been identified. B-Myb, a conserved member of the Myb oncoprotein family, is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein expressed in virtually all proliferating mammalian cells. Increasing evidence suggests that B-Myb plays an important role during the late G1 and early S phases of the cell cycle. In this study, we have examined the regulation of B-Myb activity by cyclin-Cdks. RESULTS: We found that the transcriptional transactivation potential of B-Myb was repressed by a regulatory domain located at the carboxyl terminus of the protein. Coexpression of B-Myb and cyclin A relieved this repression by phosphorylation of B-Myb in its carboxy-terminal region. Tryptic phosphopeptide mapping revealed that endogenous B-Myb was phosphorylated in cells undergoing S phase. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides evidence for a link between the Myb oncoprotein family and the cell-cycle machinery. We have shown that the carboxyl terminus of B-Myb acts as a cell-cycle sensor that regulates the transactivation function of B-Myb. Moreover, our studies have identified B-Myb as a target of cyclin A-Cdk2 and have indicated that B-Myb activity is regulated by phosphorylation mediated by cyclin A-Cdk2.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2006

A novel repressor domain is required for maximal growth inhibition by the IRF-1 tumor suppressor.

Interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) is a transcription factor and tumor suppressor that can regulate gene expression in a manner requiring either its sequence specific DNA binding activity or its ability to bind the p300 coactivator. We show that IRF-1-mediated growth inhibition is dependent on the integrity of a C-terminal transcriptional enhancer domain. An enhancer subdomain (amino acids 301-325) that differentially regulates IRF-1 activity has been identified and this region mediates the repression of Cdk2. The repressor domain encompasses an LXXLL coregulator signature motif and mutations or deletions within this region completely uncouple transcriptional activation from repression. The loss of growth suppressor activity when the Cdk2-repressor domain of IRF-1 is mutated implicates repression as a determinant of its maximal growth inhibitory potential. The data link IRF-1 regulatory domains to its growth inhibitory activity and provide information about how differential gene regulation may contribute to IRF-1 tumor suppressor activity.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2003

Translational repression of a C. elegans Notch mRNA by the STAR/KH domain protein GLD-1.

In C. elegans, the Notch receptor GLP-1 is localized within the germline and early embryo by translational control of glp-1 mRNA. RNA elements in the glp-1 3'untranslated region (3' UTR) are necessary for repression of glp-1 translation in germ cells, and for localization of translation to anterior cells of the early embryo. The direct regulators of glp-1 mRNA are not known. Here, we show that a 34 nucleotide region of the glp-1 3' UTR contains two regulatory elements, an element that represses translation in germ cells and posterior cells of the early embryo, and an element that inhibits repressor activity to promote translation in the embryo. Furthermore, we show that the STAR/KH domain protein GLD-1 binds directly and specifically to the repressor element. Depletion of GLD-1 activity by RNA interference causes loss of endogenous glp-1 mRNA repression in early meiotic germ cells, and in posterior cells of the early embryo. Therefore, GLD-1 is a direct repressor of glp-1 translation at two developmental stages. These results suggest a new function for GLD-1 in regulating early embryonic asymmetry. Furthermore, these observations indicate that precise control of GLD-1 activity by other regulatory factors is important to localize this Notch receptor, and contributes to the spatial organization of Notch signaling.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Two novel Krüppel-associated box-containing zinc-finger proteins, KRAZ1 and KRAZ2, repress transcription through functional interaction with the corepressor KAP-1 (TIF1beta/KRIP-1).

We have isolated two novel Krüppel-like zinc finger proteins containing the evolutionarily conserved Krüppel-associated box (KRAB), KRAZ1 and KRAZ2, and demonstrated that they repress transcription when heterologously targeted to DNA. Their repression activity appeared to be mediated by the putative corepressor KAP-1 (KRAB-associated protein-1), because KRAZ1/2 bind to KAP-1, but KRAB mutants of KRAZ1/2 that are unable to interact with KAP-1 lack repression activity, and KAP-1 has intrinsic repressor activity and potentiates KRAZ1/2-mediated repression. We dissected the KAP-1 protein into a KRAB-interacting domain and a region necessary for repression. Using a mammalian two-hybrid assay, we further demonstrated that KAP-1 deletions lacking repression activity fused to the VP16 transactivation domain strongly activated transcription when coexpressed with KRAZ1. In contrast, VP16-KAP-1 fusions retaining repression activity resulted in repression. These results provide the first evidence that KAP-1 functionally interacts with KRAB in mammalian cells and seems to exert repressor activity in the DNA-bound KRAB-KAP-1 complex, and they further support the hypothesis that KAP-1 functions as a corepressor for the large class of KRAB-containing zinc finger proteins.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2001

Association with the nuclear matrix and interaction with Groucho and RUNX proteins regulate the transcription repression activity of the basic helix loop helix factor Hes1.

Hairy/Enhancer of split 1 (Hes1) is a mammalian transcriptional repressor that plays crucial roles in the regulation of several developmental processes, including neuronal differentiation. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that regulate the transcription repression activity of Hes1. It is shown here that Hes1 associates with the nuclear matrix, the ribonucleoprotein network of the nucleus that plays important roles in transcriptional regulation. Nuclear matrix binding is mediated by the same Hes1 C-terminal domain that is also required for transcriptional repression. This domain contains the WRPW motif that acts as a binding site for the transcriptional corepressor Groucho, which also localizes to the nuclear matrix. Both the nuclear matrix association and transcription repression activity of Hes1 are inhibited by deletion of the WRPW motif, indicating that Groucho acts as a transcriptional corepressor for Hes1. This corepressor role is not modulated by the Groucho-related gene product Grg5. In contrast, the Runt-related protein RUNX2, which localizes to the nuclear matrix and interacts with Groucho and Hes1, can inhibit both the Groucho.Hes1 interaction and the transcription repression ability of Hes1. Together, these observations suggest that transcriptional repression by Hes1 requires interactions with Groucho at the nuclear matrix and that RUNX proteins act as negative regulators of the repressive activity of Groucho.Hes1 complexes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Roles of PSF protein and VL30 RNA in reversible gene regulation.

The mammalian protein PSF contains a DNA-binding domain (DBD) that coordinately represses multiple oncogenic genes in human cell lines, indicating a role for PSF as a human tumor-suppressor protein. PSF also contains two RNA-binding domains (RBD) that form a complex with a noncoding VL30 retroelement RNA, releasing PSF from a gene and reversing repression. Thus, the DBD and RBD in PSF are linked by a mechanism of reversible gene regulation involving a noncoding RNA. This mechanism also could apply to other regulatory proteins that contain both DBD and RBD. The mouse genome has multiple copies of VL30 retroelements that are developmentally regulated, and mouse cells contain VL30 RNAs that have normal and pathological roles in gene regulation. Human chromosome 11 has a VL30 retroelement, and a VL30 EST was identified in human blastocyst cells, indicating that the PSF-VL30 RNA regulatory mechanism also could function in human cells.

Cell Line, Tumor↗
PubMed2002

Imprinting regulator DNMT3L is a transcriptional repressor associated with histone deacetylase activity.

DNMT3L is a regulator of imprint establishment of normally methylated maternal genomic sequences. DNMT3L shows high similarity to the de novo DNA methyltransferases, DNMT3A and DNMT3B, however, the amino acid residues needed for DNA cytosine methyltransferase activity have been lost from the DNMT3L protein sequence. Apart from methyltransferase activity, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b serve as transcriptional repressors associating with histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Here we show that DNMT3L can also repress transcription by binding directly to HDAC1 protein. We have identified the PHD-like zinc finger of the ATRX domain as a main repression motif of DNMT3L, through which DNMT3L recruits the HDAC activity needed for transcriptional silencing. Furthermore, we show that DNMT3L protein contains an active nuclear localisation signal at amino acids 156-159. These results describe DNMT3L as a co-repressor protein and suggest that a transcriptionally repressed chromatin organisation through HDAC activity is needed for establishment of genomic imprints.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2002

Structural basis for the recognition of the E2F transactivation domain by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor.

Repression of E2F transcription activity by the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor through its interaction with the transactivation domain of the E2F transcription factor is one of the central features of G1/S arrest in the mammalian cell cycle. Deregulation of the Rb-E2F interaction results in hyperproliferation, lack of differentiation, and apoptosis, and can lead to cancer. The 2.2-A crystal structure of the Rb pocket complexed with an 18-residue transactivation-domain peptide of E2F-2 reveals that the boomerang-shaped peptide binds to the highly conserved interface between the A-box and the B-box of the Rb pocket in a bipartite manner. The N-terminal segment of the E2F-2 peptide in an extended beta-strand-like structure interacts with helices from the conserved groove at the A-B interface, whereas the C-terminal segment, which contains one 3(10) helix, binds to a groove mainly formed by A-box helices. The flexibility in the middle of the E2F-2 peptide is essential for the tight association of E2F to the Rb pocket. The binding of Rb to the E2F-2 peptide conceals several conserved residues that are crucial for transcription activation of E2F. We provide the structural basis for the Rb-mediated repression of E2F transcription activity without the requirement of histone-modifying enzymes.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Amino acid 1-209 is essential for PDX-1-mediated repression of human CMV IE promoter activity.

AIM: To explore the different roles of pancreatic duodenal homeobox factors-1 (PDX-1) domains in PDX-1 mediated repression of human cytomegalovirus immediately early (CMV IE) promoter. METHODS: A series of truncated PDX-1 mutants were constructed. The binding of PDX-1 and CMV IE promoter was identified by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The dual-reporter assay was applied to examine the repression activities of PDX-1 mutants on CMV IE promoter. In addition, RNAi technology was used to specifically knock down the endogenous PDX-1 expression. RESULTS: The reporter assay indicated that compared to the mock controls (pEGFP-N2), overexpression of PDX-1 resulted in a 41% decrease of CMV IE promoter activity in the 293 cells (P< 0.05) and 43% decrease in HeLa cells (P< 0.05), and the repression levels of various truncated mutants played on CMV IE promoter were different. Specific knock down of the endogenous PDX-1 expression significantly restored the activity of CMV IE promoter. EMSA demonstrated that domain 3 is necessary for nuclear localization and DNA binding activity of PDX-1. However, binding of PDX-1 alone to CMV IE promoter was not sufficient to inhibit its transcriptional activity, and other domains of PDX-1 presented were also required. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that the DNA binding activity of PDX-1 domain 3 and the cooperative binding of PDX-1 domain 1/2 with other proteins were required for PDX-1 mediated repression of CMV IE promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

NMR structure of bacterial ribosomal protein l20: implications for ribosome assembly and translational control.

L20 is a specific protein of the bacterial ribosome, which is involved in the early assembly steps of the 50S subunit and in the feedback control of the expression of its own gene. This dual function involves specific interactions with either the 23S rRNA or its messenger RNA. The solution structure of the free Aquifex aeolicus L20 has been solved. It is composed of an unstructured N-terminal domain comprising residues 1-58 and a C-terminal alpha-helical domain. This is in contrast with what is observed in the bacterial 50S subunit, where the N-terminal region folds as an elongated alpha-helical region. The solution structure of the C-terminal domain shows that several solvent-accessible, conserved residues are clustered on the surface of the molecule and are probably involved in RNA recognition. In vivo studies show that this domain is sufficient to repress the expression of the cistrons encoding L35 and L20 in the IF3 operon. The ability of L20 C-terminal domain to specifically recognise RNA suggests an assembly mechanism for L20 into the ribosome. The pre-folded C-terminal domain would make a primary interaction with a specific site on the 23S rRNA. The N-terminal domain would then fold within the ribosome, participating in its correct 3D assembly.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Substitution of basic amino acids in the basic region stabilizes DNA binding by E12 homodimers.

The E2A gene encodes two alternatively spliced products, E12 and E47. The two proteins differ in their basic helix-loop-helix motifs (bHLH), responsible for DNA binding and dimerization. Although both E12 and E47 can bind to DNA as heterodimers with tissue-specific bHLH proteins, E12 binds to DNA poorly as homodimers. An inhibitory domain in E12 has previously been found to prevent E12 homodimers from binding to DNA. By measuring the dissociation rates using filter binding and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we have shown here that the inhibitory domain interferes with DNA binding by destabilizing the DNA-protein complexes. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that substitution of basic amino acids (not other amino acids) in the DNA-binding domain of E12 can increase the intrinsic DNA-binding activity of E12 and stabilize the binding complexes, thus alleviating the repression from the inhibitory domain. This ability of basic amino acids to stabilize DNA-binding complexes may be of biological significance in the case of myogenic bHLH proteins, which all possess two more basic amino acids in their DNA binding domain than E12. To function as heterodimers with E12, the myogenic bHLH proteins may need stronger DNA binding domains.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed1995

Androgen receptor-mediated transcriptional regulation in the absence of direct interaction with a specific DNA element.

Androgen receptor (AR) brings about a ligand-dependent inhibition of low-affinity neurotrophin receptor (p75) promoter constructs in cultured cells, with the greatest inhibition being achieved with a reporter gene containing 1050 nucleotides (nt) of the promoter. The receptor domain critical for trans-repression localizes to the same region (amino acids 147-296) as that mandatory for transactivation. In contrast to trans-activation, AR does not interact directly with specific DNA elements to elicit trans-repression of p75 promoter constructs, although an intact DNA-binding domain of the receptor is required for both actions. In a search for interacting partners, both extensively purified full-length AR and AR-DNA binding domain were found to inhibit c-Jun/AP-1 site interaction without themselves binding to the AP-1 element. Prior binding of c-Jun to the AP-1 element protected the complex from the receptor's interference. Repression was not mutual, as c-Jun did not inhibit AR-androgen response element interaction or trans-activation through an androgen response element-containing promoter. The 1050-nt-long p75 promoter sequence does not contain an AP-1 element; an AP-1-like site in the vector backbone mediates the trans-repression by the AR in recipient cells. Intriguingly, an AR form with a large N-terminal deletion (the delta 46-408 mutant) behaved as a transcriptional activator of the p75 promoter through a mechanism that was also independent of specific DNA binding. Collectively, these data indicate that, in a proper context, AR is able to elicit both transrepression and trans-activation without interacting directly with specific DNA elements. Sequences responsible for the down-regulation of p75 mRNA by androgens in vivo are, however, not located in the proximal 1050 nt of the p75 promoter.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

A conserved 12-amino acid motif in Sall1 recruits the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase corepressor complex.

Sall1 is a multi-zinc finger transcription factor that represses gene expression and regulates organogenesis. In this report, we further characterize the domain of Sall1 necessary for repression. We show that endogenous Sall1 binds to the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase corepressor complex (NuRD) and confirm the functionality of the Sall1-associating macromolecular complex by showing that the complex possesses HDAC activity. NuRD is involved in global transcriptional repression and regulation of specific developmental processes. The mechanism by which sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins associate with NuRD is not well understood. We have identified a highly conserved 12-amino acid motif in the transcription factor Sall1 that is sufficient for the recruitment of NuRD. Single amino acid substitutions defined the critical amino acid peptide motif as RRKQXK-PXXF. This motif probably exhibits a more general role in regulating gene expression, since other proteins containing this domain, including all Sall family members and an unrelated zinc finger protein Ebfaz, mediate transcriptional repression and associate with NuRD. These results also have important implications for the pathogenesis of Townes-Brocks, a syndrome caused by SALL1 mutations.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2001

Human T-cell leukemia virus type I tax repression of p73beta is mediated through competition for the C/H1 domain of CBP.

The Tax protein, encoded by the human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I), is required for high level viral transcription and HTLV-I-associated malignant transformation. Although the precise mechanism of malignant transformation by Tax is unclear, it is well established that Tax represses the transcription function of the tumor suppressor p53, possibly accelerating the accumulation of genetic mutations that are critical in HTLV-I-mediated malignant transformation. Tax repression of p53 transcription function appears to occur, at least in part, through competition for the cellular coactivator CBP/p300. In this study, we characterize the effect of Tax on the p53 family member, p73. We demonstrate that Tax also represses the transcription function of p73beta and that the repression is reciprocal in vivo, consistent with the idea that both transcription factors may compete for CBP/p300 in vivo. We provide evidence showing that both Tax and p73 interact strongly with the C/H1 domain of CBP and that their binding to this region is mutually exclusive in vitro. This finding provides evidence supporting the idea that reciprocal transcriptional repression between Tax and p73 is mediated through coactivator competition.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

ING2 PHD domain links histone H3 lysine 4 methylation to active gene repression.

Dynamic regulation of diverse nuclear processes is intimately linked to covalent modifications of chromatin. Much attention has focused on methylation at lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4), owing to its association with euchromatic genomic regions. H3K4 can be mono-, di- or tri-methylated. Trimethylated H3K4 (H3K4me3) is preferentially detected at active genes, and is proposed to promote gene expression through recognition by transcription-activating effector molecules. Here we identify a novel class of methylated H3K4 effector domains--the PHD domains of the ING (for inhibitor of growth) family of tumour suppressor proteins. The ING PHD domains are specific and highly robust binding modules for H3K4me3 and H3K4me2. ING2, a native subunit of a repressive mSin3a-HDAC1 histone deacetylase complex, binds with high affinity to the trimethylated species. In response to DNA damage, recognition of H3K4me3 by the ING2 PHD domain stabilizes the mSin3a-HDAC1 complex at the promoters of proliferation genes. This pathway constitutes a new mechanism by which H3K4me3 functions in active gene repression. Furthermore, ING2 modulates cellular responses to genotoxic insults, and these functions are critically dependent on ING2 interaction with H3K4me3. Together, our findings establish a pivotal role for trimethylation of H3K4 in gene repression and, potentially, tumour suppressor mechanisms.

Amino Acid Motifs↗