THE PERCEPTION OF RHYTHMICALLY REPEATED LINEAR MOTION IN THE VERTICAL PLANE.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Deafness↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Motion Perception”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Direction-selective adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion.
Across four experiments, this study investigated direction-specific adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by moving binocular disparity information (stereoscopic motion). The stimuli were moving arrays of stereoscopic dots created from dynamic random-element stereograms. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effects of adaptation to motion in a given direction on the apparent direction of test motion. Results showed that the direction of test motion appeared repulsed away from the direction of adapting motion (repulsion aftereffect) by as much as 20 deg or more when directions of adapt and test were similar. Experiment 3 investigated transfer of the repulsion aftereffect across the stereoscopic and luminance domains by employing stereoscopic adapting motion and luminance test motion or vice versa. Results showed that the repulsion aftereffect transferred across the two stimulus domains. Experiment 4 investigated direction-specific contrast by measuring the perceived direction of two stereoscopic arrays presented simultaneously and moving in different directions. Results showed that the directions of the arrays appeared repulsed away from one another when their directions were similar. Taken together, these results suggest that the direction of stereoscopic motion is coded in the activity of directionally selective mechanisms, as is the case for luminance-domain motion. Transfer of the repulsion aftereffect between stereoscopic and luminance domains indicates the two kinds of motion perception are mediated by a common substrate.
Adaptation, Ocular↗
Mechanism of anomalous retinal correspondence: maintenance of binocularity with alteration of receptive-field position in the lateral suprasylvian (LS) visual area of strabismic cats.
We have examined the effects of rearing kittens with a unilateral convergent strabismus, induced surgically at 3 weeks of age, on the binocularity (ocular dominance) and receptive-field position of neurons in the motion-sensitive lateral suprasylvian (LS) area of cat extrastriate cortex. Data were compared to those obtained from area 17 in the same animals, and from the two areas of cortex in normal adult cats. Interocular alignment of the operated cats was assessed in alert adults using corneal reflex photography and during recording from the positions of retinal landmarks under paralysis. The strabismus magnitude in each operated cat was calculated by comparison with equivalent data from the normal animals. Strabismus always caused a major loss of binocularity in area 17. The remaining binocular neurons had receptive-field (RF) pairs arising from positions of normal correspondence in the two retinae and would thus have been responsive to different regions of visual space through the misaligned eyes in the alert animal. In area LS, the effects were dependent on the strabismus magnitude. In the group of four cats with pronounced strabismus (18-30 deg crossed), a loss of binocularity occurred in area LS equivalent in severity to that in area 17. The majority of the remaining binocular LS neurons possessed RF pairs in normal retinal correspondence and would thus, in the alert animal, have received spatially disparate visual input through the two eyes. This also occurred in three other cats with more moderate strabismus (11-15 deg crossed), although only a small breakdown in the binocularity of area LS was apparent. The group of cats with mild strabismus (less than or equal to 10 deg crossed) had normal proportions of binocular neurons in area LS. In three of these cats, the maintenance of binocularity was accompanied by shifts in RF position, with visual inputs arising from anomalous retinal locations. These shifts compensated, in part, for the strabismus angle present in each cat, so that most of the binocular LS neurons would have received inputs from regions of visual correspondence through the misaligned eyes when the animal was alert. Similar mechanisms could afford a basis for the binocular visual compensations that occur in humans with small-angle strabismus of early onset. If so, anomalous retinal correspondence in such individuals would have as a locus areas of extrastriate cortex with a role in motion perception, and would involve alterations to the neural substrate underlying normal binocular vision.
Animals↗
A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination.
Training improves the ability of human observers to discriminate between two similar directions of motion. This gradual improvement is specific to the direction on which an observer is trained, and it endures for several months. Improvement does not affect motion perception generally, nor does it depend on recognition of details of the movement.
Discrimination, Psychological↗
Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing.
A variety of psychophysical studies suggests that motion perception in humans is mediated by at least two speed-tuned channels. To study the neurophysiological underpinnings of these channels in the human visual cortex, we recorded visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to motion onset. We applied an adaptation paradigm that allowed us (a) to isolate and extract direction-specific cortical responses and (b) to assess cross-adaptation in the speed domain. VEPs resulting from the onset of left- or rightward motion at either low or high speeds were recorded from three occipital recording sites in 11 subjects. For each of these test stimuli, responses were collected after adaptation to one of five different conditions: a static adaptation pattern (baseline), adaptation to low-speed motion (3.5 degrees/s) either in the same or in the opposite direction as the test, or adaptation to high-speed motion (32 degrees/s) either in the same or in the opposite direction as the test. We report considerable direction-specific adaptation for same adaptation and test speeds (by 28-37% of baseline response; p <.002), whereas there was no direction-specific adaptation across speeds. We supplement these electrophysiological data with corresponding psychophysical results. The lack of direction-specific cross-adaptation in the speed domain demonstrated with physiological and psychophysical techniques supports models of at least two speed-tuned channels in the human motion system.
Adaptation, Ocular↗
Visible persistence and form correspondence in Ternus apparent motion.
Visual stimuli remain visible for some time after their physical offset (visible persistence). Visible persistence has been hypothesized to play an important role in determining the pattern of correspondence matching in the Ternus apparent-motion display. In this display, one or more elements reappears in overlapping locations at different times, whereas another element appears alternately to the right or the left of these elements. Usually either the elements are perceived to move coherently as a group (group motion), or one element may be perceived to hop over one or more other elements (element motion). According to the visible-persistence account of the perceptual organization of the Ternus display, element motion is seen when the temporal gap between elements in overlapping locations is small enough to be bridged by visible persistence; if it is not, group motion is seen. We conducted four experiments to test this visible-persistence account. In Experiments 1 and 2, a form correspondence cue (line length) was introduced to bias the visual system toward the element-motion interpretation, while visible persistence was either reduced or eliminated. The element-motion percept dominated despite the elimination of visible persistence. In Experiments 3 and 4, we found that Ternus elements presented without interruption, and thus presumably persisting over time, can be perceived in group motion. Together, the results indicate that visible persistence is neither necessary nor sufficient to account for the pattern of correspondence matches in the Ternus display.
Form Perception↗
The interaction of eye movements and retinal signals during the perception of 3-D motion direction.
When an object is tracked with the eyes, veridical perception of the motion of that object and other objects requires the brain to take account of and compensate for the eye movement. Here, I explore the effects of version and vergence eye movements on three-dimensional (3-D) motion perception. After demonstrating that eye movement compensation can be poor for detecting small objects moving in depth, I develop two models for how eye movement and visual signals may interact during the perception of 3-D motion direction. The first model assumes that the visual system is aiming to form an explicit representation of 3-D motion. From the results of a second experiment, on 3-D motion direction judgements, I show that this model could only hold with almost perfect 3-D motion compensation, contradicting the results from the first experiment. A second model assumes a much simpler strategy for estimating 3-D motion direction, based on recent experimental work. It predicts that compensation for vergence is not required because the Z-component of 3-D motion is not needed for direction judgements, consistent with the experimental results. This suggests that, for 3-D motion direction discrimination and angle judgements, extraretinal signals from vergence are not used.
Adaptation, Physiological↗
The representation of uniform motion in vision.
For veridical detection of object motion any moving detecting system must allocate motion appropriately between itself and objects in space. A model for such allocation is developed for simplified situations (points of light in uniform motion in a frontoparallel plane). It is proposed that motion of objects is registered and represented successively at four levels within frames of reference that are defined by the detectors themselves or by their movements. The four levels are referred to as retinocentric, orbitocentric, egocentric, and geocentric. Thus the retinocentric signal is combined with that for eye rotation to give an orbitocentric signal, and the left and right orbitocentric signals are combined to give an egocentric representation. Up to the egocentric level, motion representation is angular rather than three-dimensional. The egocentric signal is combined with signals for head and body movement and for egocentric distance to give a geocentric representation. It is argued that although motion perception is always geocentric, relevant registrations also occur at the three earlier levels. The model is applied to various veridical and nonveridical motion phenomena.
Concept Formation↗
Perceived direction of plaid motion is not predicted by component speeds.
It has been shown that the perceived direction of a plaid with components of unequal contrast is biased towards the direction of the higher-contrast component [Stone, L. S., Watson, A. B., & Mulligan, J. B. (1990). Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid. Vision Research 30, 1049-1067]. It was proposed that this effect is due to the influence of contrast on the perceived speed of the plaid components. This led to the conclusion that perceived plaid direction is computed by the intersection of constraints (IOC) of the perceived speed of the components rather than their physical speeds. We tested this proposal at a wider range of component speeds (2-16deg/s) than used previously, across which the effect of contrast on perceived speed is seen to reverse. We find that across this range, perceived plaid direction cannot be predicted either by a model which takes the IOC of physical or perceived component speed. Our results are consistent with an explanation of 2D motion perception proposed by [Bowns, L. (1996). Evidence for a feature tracking explanation of why Type II plaids move in the vector sum direction at short durations. Vision Research, 36, 3685-3694.] in which the motion of the zero-crossing edges of the features in the stimulus contribute to the perceived direction of motion.
Contrast Sensitivity↗
Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET.
We conducted a PET study to directly compare the differential effects of visual motion stimulation that induced either rollvection about the line of sight or forward linearvection along this axis in the same subjects. The main question was, whether the areas that respond to vection are identical or separate and distinct for rollvection and linearvection. Eleven healthy volunteers were exposed to large-field (100 degrees x 60 degrees ) visual motion stimulation consisting of (1) dots accelerating from a focus of expansion to the edge of the screen (forward linearvection) and (2) dots rotating counterclockwise in the frontal plane (clockwise rollvection). These two stimuli, which induced apparent self-motion in all subjects, were compared to each other and to a stationary visual pattern. Linearvection and rollvection led to bilateral activations of visual areas including medial parieto-occipital (PO), occipito-temporal (MT/V5), and ventral occipital (fusiform gyri) cortical areas, as well as superior parietal sites. Activations in the polar visual cortex around the calcarine sulcus (BA 17, BA 18) were larger and more significant during linearvection. Temporo-parietal sites displayed higher activity levels during rollvection. Differential activation of PO or MT/V5 was not found. Both stimuli led to simultaneous deactivations of retroinsular regions (more pronounced during linearvection); this is compatible with an inhibitory interaction between the visual and the vestibular systems for motion perception.
Adult↗
Horizontal or vertical optokinetic stimulation activates visual motion-sensitive, ocular motor and vestibular cortex areas with right hemispheric dominance. An fMRI study.
The differential effects of optokinetic stimulation with and without fixation suppression were analysed in an fMRI study in 10 right-handed healthy subjects. Horizontal and vertical small-field optokinetic stimulation activated the same multiple visual, ocular motor and vestibular cortical and subcortical areas in both hemispheres. The extent of activation in each hemisphere was independent of the stimulus direction. All activated areas representing cortical (occipitotemporal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, precentral and posterior median frontal gyrus, prefrontal cortex, medial part of the superior frontal gyrus) and subcortical (caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus and paramedian thalamus) ocular motor structures were activated during optokinetic stimulation as well as during fixation suppression of optokinetic nystagmus. However, the activation was significantly stronger with optokinetc nystagmus compared with fixation suppression. The only relatively increased activity during fixation suppression was seen in the medial part of the superior frontal gyrus (supplementary eye field) and the anterior cingulate gyrus. The anterior insula and the posterior insula (human homologue of the parieto-insular vestibular cortex) were activated during optokinetic nystagmus but not during fixation suppression. A significant right hemispheric predominance (regardless of stimulus direction) was found under both conditions in the visual motion-sensitive and ocular motor areas of the cortex, except the supplementary eye field and anterior cingulate gyrus. This was most prominent in the occipitotemporal cortex, but did not occur in the primary visual cortex and in subcortical ocular motor structures (putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus). Thus, cortical and subcortical activation patterns did not differ for horizontal and vertical optokinetic stimulation, and there was distinct right-hemisphere dominance for visual motion-sensitive and cortical ocular motor areas and the thalamus. Fixation suppression of optokinetic nystagmus yielded four different results: (i) increased activation in the supplementary eye field and anterior cingulate gyrus; (ii) unchanged activation in the visual cortex; (iii) decreased activation in most of the ocular motor areas; and (iv) suppressed activation in the anterior and posterior insula and the thalamus. Activation of the parieto-insular vestibular cortex may be related to ocular motor function rather than self-motion perception.
Adult↗
A motion-sensitive area in ferret extrastriate visual cortex: an analysis in pigmented and albino animals.
In search of the neuronal substrate for motion analysis in the ferret (Mustela putorius furo), we extracellularly recorded from extrastriate visual cortex in five pigmented and two albino ferrets under general anaesthesia and paralysis. Visual stimulation consisted of large area random dot patterns moving either on a circular path in the frontoparallel plane or expanding and contracting radially. Strongly direction-selective neurons were recorded in a circumscribed area in and just posterior to the suprasylvian sulcus, thus named by us the posterior suprasylvian area (area PSS). Altogether, we recorded 210 (90%) and 95 (72%) PSS neurons in pigmented and albino ferrets, respectively, that were direction selective. In these neurons responses during random dot pattern stimulation in the preferred direction were at least twice as strong than stimulation in the non-preferred direction. Response strength in preferred direction and tuning sharpness of PSS neurons in albinos were significantly reduced when compared to pigmented animals (median values: 34.1 versus 14.8 spikes/s and 142 versus 165 degrees for pigmented and albino ferrets, respectively). Inter-spike-intervals during visual stimulation were significantly shorter in pigmented (median 9 ms) than in albino PSS neurons (median 14 ms). Our data indicate that area PSS may play a crucial role in motion perception in the ferret.
Action Potentials↗
Dynamic object perception by pigeons.
Three experiments examined pigeon discrimination of computer-generated three-dimensional (3-D) projections of cube and pyramid objects. Four pigeons were tested using a go/no-go procedure involving static and dynamically rotating presentations of these stimuli. Transfer tests with different types of rotational and featural transformations suggested the pigeons may have used a 3-D representation of the objects as their primary means of performing the discrimination. The comparative implications for object and motion perception in animals are considered.
Animals↗
Pattern and component motion selectivity in cortical area PMLS of the cat.
Visual motion perception is one of the most prominent functions performed by the mammalian cerebral cortex. The moving images are commonly considered to be processed in two stages. The first-stage neurons are sensitive to the motion of one-dimensional orientated components, and their outputs are combined at the second stage to perceive the global motion of the whole pattern. Alternatively, the pattern motion may be signalled by monitoring a distinctive feature of the image, such as a line-end or a corner. In the present study, a series of 'random-line' patterns were used to measure the direction-tuning responses of 138 neurons in the posteromedial lateral suprasylvian area of the cat. The novel stimuli comprised identical thin line segments, with a length : width ratio no less than 10 : 1, which were moved perpendicularly or obliquely to their common orientation during the recordings. When the component lines were much shorter than the size of receptive field, the majority of cells were selective to the direction of pattern motion while only a small subset was sensitive to the direction of component motion. However, the response profiles of most cells became more component-motion selective with the increment of orientation element in stimulus by elongating the component lines in the patterns. These findings imply that the two-stage theory might be incomplete for modelling the visual motion analysis. Even at relatively low levels of the visual system, some kind of nonorientation-based processing may coexist with the orientation-sensitive processing in a dynamic competition, where one rises as the other falls depending upon the strength of the orientation element in the stimulus, so that under some circumstances it becomes possible to signal the veridical direction of pattern motion.
Action Potentials↗
A spatial gradient of acceleration and temporal extension underlies three illusions of motion.
If an object (or cue), is presented and shortly afterwards a line is drawn with one end near to the object, motion away from the object location is induced within the line. This line-motion illusion has best been explained by postulating a facilitative spatial gradient that accelerates signal transmission most strongly near to the object, and less so with increasing distance away from the object. This simple accelerative-gradient model was tested in four experiments by either briefly presenting the line, or replacing the line rendering with a dot moving at high velocity towards (or away from) the initial object location. Observers first perceived motion away from the cue followed by motion towards the cue (hence this new illusion is referred to as the "two motion percepts", or TMP illusion). The generality of the TMP illusion was investigated through the reports of forty-five inexperienced undergraduates who were presented with TMP displays. Observers who were asked to pictorially reproduce their motion experience, drew a line expanding away from the cue then contracting back towards it 85% of the time. Over 90% of individuals reported experiencing the illusion with a quickly moving dot. The effects of several presentation parameters were investigated by the moving-dot method, and it was concluded that the accelerative-gradient model by itself was inadequate to explain TMP phenomena. Two extended versions of the gradient model are proposed that place the locus of the TMP effects in properties of motion detection mechanisms or in temporal aspects of visual-signal transmission.
Computer Graphics↗
Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects.
PURPOSE: To determine whether patients with primary open-angle glaucoma have an increase in size thresholds, prolongation of reaction times, and greater localization errors to random dot motion stimuli than normal subjects. METHODS: Motion perimetry, a computer graphics method of visual field testing, quantitates a subject's ability to detect a correlated shift in position of dots within a defined circular area against a background of fixed dots. We measured motion thresholds, the smallest detectable circular dot motion target, at the Humphrey 24-2 test loci. By using the subject's light-pen responses to the location of the targets, we computed motion size threshold, reaction times, and localization errors (number of pixels from where the subject touched the monitor to the target center). With motion perimetry and conventional automated perimetry, we tested one eye in each of 25 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 25 age-matched control subjects. We then generated total deviation pointwise probability plots for the patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. RESULTS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had increased mean motion size threshold (P < .001) and increased localization errors (P < .002), compared with the control subjects. With the probability plot analysis, there was good correlation of the visual field defects between the two perimetry tests. Additionally, motion perimetry identified nerve fiber bundle-like defects in 12 patients that were not detected with conventional automated perimetry. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had abnormal motion perception with an increase in spatial localization error.
Adult↗
Localization and functional analysis of human cortical area V5 using magneto-encephalography.
Using a multi-channel SQUID-based neuromagnetometer, we have determined the location, temporal dynamics and functional response properties of the human homologue of the primate cortical area V5 (MT). We provide evidence that area V5 in humans is located near the occipito-temporal border in a minor sulcus immediately below the superior temporal sulcus. this area is selective for low spatial frequencies ( < or = 4.0 c/deg), responds to a wide range of temporal frequencies ( < or = 35 Hz) and shows response saturation for stimulus contrasts greater than 10%. In addition, we find that this area is not responsive to purely chromatic patterns but is responsive to motion-contrast stimuli. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that area V5 in humans represents a stage of processing within the magnocellular pathway. We discuss our results in relation to the widespread belief that area V5 in humans is specifically concerned with motion perception.
Adult↗
Vision during motion in patients with absent vestibular function.
We have measured a spatial visual response and visual velocity discrimination in 4 patients with long standing vestibular loss and 6 controls. The spatial response was measured during; i) body and visual display stationary conditions, ii) whole-body oscillation (1 Hz +/- 50 degrees/s) and iii) visual stimulus oscillation (1 Hz +/- 50 degrees/s). Velocity discrimination was assessed during conditions i) and ii). The visual tests applied were selected on the basis that the spatial response is known to reflect peripheral processes of the retina, whereas velocity processing is more central in origin. Patients had normal spatial responses under static conditions and they suffered a degradation in their spatial responses during whole-body oscillation, whereas, normals' responses remained unaltered. During oscillation of the visual display both patients and normals suffered a degradation in their spatial responses, and for patients the change was very similar to that observed during whole-body oscillation. The changes in the spatial responses were dependent on the gain of the eye movements which compensated for the whole-body or visual display oscillation. In 3 patients and all controls whole-body oscillation did not alter the discrimination of velocity of a vertically moving horizontally orientated grating compared with when the subjects were stationary. One patient suffered a severe reduction in the ability to discriminate velocity under whole-body oscillation, which suggests that central suppression of motion perception reduces oscillopsia.
Acceleration↗