Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Medical Liability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Safety and quality.

Safe and high quality health care is an objective that everybody supports. With so much written about it and everybody committed to it, why are we still struggling to achieve it? The successful acceptance and adoption of casemix provides some clues as to the answer. This paper examines the factors that assisted casemix and the obstacles to achieving progress with safety and quality. It concludes that both the health industry and community's tolerance of risk in health is too high. The lessons from the casemix story can be applied to advance the safety and quality agenda. A good place to start is a determined campaign focussing on improving safety.

Australia↗
PubMed1994

Say no to inadequate tort reform.

From his vantage point as president of a large multispecialty group practice. Dr Montgomery has observed the direct effects that medical malpractice liability has had on healthcare costs. Here he offers a counterpoint to the Clinton plan's malpractice provisions and enumerates his own recommendations for meaningful tort reform.

Group Practice↗
PubMed1991

The adequacy of college health insurance coverage.

This analysis of private health insurance plans offered in 100 four-year colleges and universities in 1988 indicates a tremendous diversity in plan options, benefits covered, cost-sharing requirements, and catastrophic protections. Consistent with relatively low premium prices, most student health insurance plans offer limited benefits and expose students to significant out-of-pocket medical cost liabilities. Only a minority of schools use financial incentives, such as preferred provider arrangements, to integrate their health insurance plans with their university health service system. We conclude that universities should carefully reexamine the adequacy of their health insurance plans and their relationship to student health centers. As more students rely on student health insurance as their only source of coverage, the quality of these plans assumes an even greater importance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The Woolley and Roe case.

Albert Woolley and Cecil Roe were healthy, middle-aged men who became paraplegic after spinal anaesthesia for minor surgery at the Chesterfield Royal Hospital in 1947. The spinal anaesthetics were given by the same anaesthetist, Dr Malcolm Graham, using the same drug on the same day at the same hospital. The outcome for the patients and their families was devastating, as it was for the use of spinal anaesthesia in the UK. At the trial 6 yr later, and against the opinion of leading neurologists, the judge accepted Professor Macintosh's suggestion that phenol, in which the ampoules of local anaesthetic had been immersed, had contaminated the local anaesthetic through invisible cracks. In an interview 30 yr after the verdict, Dr Graham believed tha the tragedy was caused by contamination of the spinal needles or syringes during the sterilization process. The subsequent explanation that, on the day in question, descaling liquid in the sterilizing pan had not been replaced by water, supported his belief and finally offered a credible explanation. We review the Woolley and Roe case, the status of spinal anaesthesia before and after 1947, and the relevant medico-legal judgments in claims for negligence in the early days of the National Health Service.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗
PubMed1990

Practice standards: implications for the internist.

Pressure for national standards of medical practice is increasing from cost control initiatives, medical malpractice liability, and the desire to simplify complex practice problems. Good standards need to be academically sound, focused enough to be clinically useful, yet flexible enough to allow for the realities of practice. Standards have already been created by several professional societies, including anesthesiology and cardiology in internal medicine. Although physician education is primary, controlling the use of expensive new technologies is an unwritten but important secondary goal. While standards have reduced malpractice liability in some professional groups, some clinicians are concerned that standards will be too academic and unrealistic. Currently, third-party payers are watching the development of practice standards but are hesitant to use them as criteria for determination of reimbursement. The federal government has a major interest in practice standards as a means of both monitoring quality of care and controlling costs. A number of agencies are studying the development of standards and their implications for use. Recent articles questioning the usefulness of common diagnostic tests and even the routine physical examination have raised concern among internists that restriction of practice and reimbursement will follow. Some evolving standards, such as screening for breast cancer, seem to ignore the realities of clinical practice and may generate more cost than they save. Internists need to provide input as standards are developed to guarantee appropriateness and feasibility.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed1988

AIDS--legal issues.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1989

Medical-legal considerations in the postdate pregnancy.

The medical-legal considerations associated with postdate pregnancies are not unlike those associated with the management of an uncomplicated pregnancy. The primary difference is, however, that these pregnancies are at a greater risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is important to maintain one's knowledge, understanding, and skills to safely manage these pregnancies and, by so doing, reduce one's medical-legal liability.

Female↗