Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Masseter Muscle”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Force vectors of single motor units in a multipennate muscle.

The masseter muscle of the rabbit has a complex architectural design. Restricted motor unit territories in the muscle provide an anatomic basis for accurate control of the force vector through selective activation. In addition, the muscle shows regional differences in fiber type composition. The main objective of the present study was to measure the force vectors of single motor units within the rabbit masseter muscle by a direct mechanical approach to test the hypothesis that: (1) motor units within the masseter muscle are capable of generating different force vectors; and (2) different motor unit types are distributed heterogeneously throughout the muscle. We used a force transducer, capable of measuring both the magnitude and the position of the line of action of a force in a single plane. Motor units in the masseter muscle showed a large range of twitch contraction times and force magnitudes. There was also a large variation in the direction and moment arm of the lines of action. The variation of the lines of action was (almost) as large as the range of fiber directions found inside the muscle. Largest forces, with relatively slow contraction velocities, were produced by motor units in the anterior masseter. Smaller forces and fastest twitch contractions were produced by motor units in the posterior deep masseter. In addition, motor units in the anterior masseter showed more variability in force production than in the posterior masseter. Our results support the idea that the masseter muscle is divided into functionally different parts.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Electromyography of masticatory muscles in three jaw registration positions.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether anteroposterior changes in mandibular position affect masticatory muscle activity. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of masticatory muscles during full and partial (10%) clenching in three mandibular bite registration positions--retruded contact position (RCP), intercuspal position (IP), and muscular position (MP)--was studied. Three groups of subjects with different ranges of anteroposterior positioning of the condyles were evaluated (normal occlusion, Class II, Division 2 malocclusion, and dual bite malocclusion). A posterior stabilizing splint for each registration position was made. EMG data were obtained from three bilateral muscles (masseter, anterior temporal, and posterior temporal). Clenching in the RCP elicited the lowest masseter muscle activity during full clenching, and the highest anterior temporal and posterior temporal muscle activity during partial clenching. If the relationships of the masticatory muscles are analyzed through a ratio that represents the interaction between biting and positioning muscles (masseter/posterior temporal muscle ratio), the RCP as compared with other positions had the lowest ratio. The RCP required more positioning muscle activity and permitted less biting muscle activity. There was no significant difference in the muscle activity between the IP and MP registrations. Small changes in jaw position (anterior to RCP) are not critical for the masticatory apparatus provided there is good intercuspation. The results of this investigation suggest that intercuspation in RCP is not the optimal position.

Adolescent↗